126:
132:
66:
for unjust dismissal. The Labour Board found he was unjustly dismissed and ordered
Slaight to write a reference letter stating that he had been employed by the radio station, the sales quotas he had been set and the amount of sales he actually made during this period, and that an adjudicator had held
48:. The Court upheld an order given by the Labour Relations Board that required an employer to give an employee a letter of recommendation containing information such as sales quotas, but could not divulge any further information regarding the employee's performance.
33:
204:
194:
175:
107:
37:
209:
199:
214:
224:
219:
60:
as a "radio time salesman" for three years. He was dismissed due to inadequate performance. Davidson filed a complaint under the
168:
229:
45:
75:
Chief
Justice Dickson, writing for the majority, dismissed the appeal. He held that the order violated s.2(b) of the
161:
94:
25:
102:
57:
29:
98:
62:
125:
145:
188:
141:
149:
24:, 1 S.C.R. 1038 is a leading decision of the
169:
8:
176:
162:
16:Judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada
205:Canadian freedom of expression case law
38:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
21:Slaight Communications Inc v Davidson
7:
121:
119:
14:
195:Canadian administrative case law
130:
124:
67:that he was unjustly dismissed.
1:
210:Supreme Court of Canada cases
79:but it was saved under s. 1.
56:Ron Davidson was employed by
200:Section Two Charter case law
148:. You can help Knowledge by
246:
215:Labour relations in Canada
118:
225:1989 in Canadian case law
220:Canadian labour case law
110:, Summary - broken link
95:Supreme Court of Canada
26:Supreme Court of Canada
58:Slaight Communications
30:freedom of expression
140:This article about
71:Ruling of the Court
230:Canadian law stubs
63:Canada Labour Code
46:administrative law
44:relationship with
157:
156:
237:
178:
171:
164:
136:
135:
134:
133:
128:
120:
108:Mapleleafweb.com
28:on the right to
245:
244:
240:
239:
238:
236:
235:
234:
185:
184:
183:
182:
131:
129:
123:
116:
90:
85:
73:
54:
17:
12:
11:
5:
243:
241:
233:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
207:
202:
197:
187:
186:
181:
180:
173:
166:
158:
155:
154:
137:
112:
111:
105:
89:
88:External links
86:
84:
81:
72:
69:
53:
50:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
242:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
193:
192:
190:
179:
174:
172:
167:
165:
160:
159:
153:
151:
147:
143:
138:
127:
122:
117:
114:
109:
106:
104:
100:
96:
93:Full text of
92:
91:
87:
82:
80:
78:
70:
68:
65:
64:
59:
51:
49:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
22:
150:expanding it
142:Canadian law
139:
115:
113:
97:decision at
76:
74:
61:
55:
41:
34:section 2(b)
20:
19:
18:
189:Categories
101: and
83:References
52:Background
42:Charter's
40:and the
77:Charter
36:of the
103:CanLII
32:under
144:is a
99:LexUM
146:stub
191::
177:e
170:t
163:v
152:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
