302:, implying that the defendant might get away with murder. He persisted even after the judge made him promise to stop in the middle of the trial. Outside of the court, he was referring to the case as his O.J. case. This behavior put more emphasis on his dismissal of every black juror as likely having a basis in race. One of the black juror candidates was recognized by the prosecution as friendly to the police, typically considered a valuable juror for the prosecution, but this candidate was likewise dismissed: another argument for racism in jury selection.
31:
385:, writing for the Court, concluded that the trial judge had acted improperly in allowing the prosecutor to peremptorily strike the African American jurors. Alito noted that the reasons given by the prosecution for striking the jurors applied equally well to the white jurors the prosecution did not strike.
290:
for the jury began on August 27, 1996. In accordance with
Louisiana law, the parties were permitted to use their peremptory strikes up until the time when the final jury was sworn and thus were permitted to strike jurors whom they had initially accepted when the jurors’ panels were called.
392:
wrote a dissent, which
Justice Scalia joined. Thomas wrote that the court improperly second-guessed the fact-based decisions of the trial court, and that a higher standard of deference ought to have been applied to the trial court's determinations.
295:; and all five of the prospective black jurors were eliminated by the prosecution through the use of peremptory strikes. The jury found petitioner guilty and determined that he should receive the death penalty.
579:
330:
determination of petitioner’s competency to stand trial. On remand, the trial court found that petitioner had been competent to stand trial, and the
Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed that determination.
1138:
374:? Petitioner claimed that at least two of the African American jurors were struck from the jury for purely race-based reasons. Respondent claimed that the race-neutral reasons offered at
370:
The question the
Supreme Court posed to the parties was: Did the state's dismissal by peremptory challenge of all of the African American potential jurors amount to a violation of the
572:
511:
456:
402:
110:
82:
565:
291:
Eighty-five prospective jurors were questioned as members of a panel. Thirty-six of these potential jurors survived challenges for cause; five of the thirty-six were
593:
350:; as a result, they granted Snyder's petition, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Louisiana Supreme Court for further consideration in light of
1133:
378:
were legitimate, and the trial court agreed. Petitioner argued that the trial court should have applied closer scrutiny to the respondent's reasoning.
1148:
675:
251:
953:
280:
Allen Snyder was charged with first-degree murder in the August 1995 stabbing to death of Howard Wilson. The State of
Louisiana sought the
426:
1128:
657:
1123:
335:
243:
35:
985:
680:
549:
1143:
753:
627:
1009:
697:
557:
299:
316:, the prosecution should not have been permitted to exercise its peremptory jury challenges based on race. The
854:
589:
371:
317:
229:
1001:
1073:
961:
635:
607:
515:
460:
114:
74:
969:
993:
923:
906:
769:
1017:
977:
874:
346:
182:
1057:
1041:
915:
835:
815:
451:
312:
281:
264:
258:, writing for the 7–2 majority, ruled that the prosecutor's use of peremptory strikes to remove
1065:
882:
761:
619:
150:
1049:
777:
292:
259:
1025:
422:
389:
269:
174:
162:
522:
63:
945:
931:
531:
247:
186:
158:
463:
1117:
326:
382:
255:
194:
170:
142:
77:
427:"Race to the Bottom – The Supreme Court takes on the O.J.-obsessed prosecutor"
340:
286:
89:
540:
358:
claim, this time by a vote of 4 to 3. The U.S. Supreme Court again granted
344:. While Snyder's petition was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court decided
320:
conditionally affirmed petitioner’s conviction, rejecting petitioner’s
211:
Alito, joined by
Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
354:. On remand, the Louisiana Supreme Court again rejected Snyder’s
1092:
interpreted the
Impartial Jury Clause of the Sixth Amendment. **
654:
605:
561:
30:
484:
State v. Snyder, 1998–1078 (La. 4/14/04), 874 So. 2d 739.
475:
State v. Snyder, 98–1078 (La. 4/14/99), 750 So. 2d 832.
298:
During the trial, the prosecutor kept referring to the
1139:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
403:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 552
905:
846:
689:
668:
310:Snyder appealed his conviction, arguing that under
223:
215:
207:
202:
131:
121:
102:
97:
69:
59:
49:
42:
23:
262:jurors violated the Court's earlier holding in
573:
127:Louisiana Supreme Court reversed and remanded
8:
109:, 942 So. 2d 484 (La. 2006); cert. granted,
665:
651:
602:
580:
566:
558:
20:
676:Racial discrimination in jury selection
550:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
414:
954:Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company
18:2008 United States Supreme Court case
7:
324:claim, but remanded the case for a
336:Supreme Court of the United States
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1134:United States Supreme Court cases
518:472 (2008) is available from:
29:
1149:2008 in United States case law
986:J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
1:
862:Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.
681:Women in United States juries
242:, 552 U.S. 472 (2008), was a
847:Fair cross-section in venire
741:Brownfield v. South Carolina
246:case about racial issues in
334:Snyder then petitioned the
244:United States Supreme Court
1165:
1129:Legal history of Louisiana
754:Franklin v. South Carolina
690:Racial exclusion in venire
628:United States v. Armstrong
541:Oyez (oral argument audio)
1124:Batson challenge case law
698:Strauder v. West Virginia
664:
650:
614:
601:
300:O. J. Simpson murder case
228:
136:
126:
54:Allen Snyder v. Louisiana
28:
868:Ballard v. United States
855:Glasser v. United States
219:Thomas, joined by Scalia
372:Equal Protection Clause
318:Louisiana Supreme Court
230:Equal Protection Clause
43:Argued December 4, 2007
1074:Flowers v. Mississippi
45:Decided March 19, 2008
1010:Johnson v. California
1002:Miller-El v. Cockrell
962:Hernandez v. New York
907:Peremptory challenges
797:Patton v. Mississippi
717:Gibson v. Mississippi
636:United States v. Bass
608:Selective prosecution
88:128 S. Ct. 1203; 170
924:Griffith v. Kentucky
823:Eubanks v. Louisiana
770:Patterson v. Alabama
723:Smith v. Mississippi
425:(December 4, 2007).
1034:Snyder v. Louisiana
1018:Miller-El v. Dretke
978:Georgia v. McCollum
890:Holland v. Illinois
875:Taylor v. Louisiana
735:Tarrance v. Florida
508:Snyder v. Louisiana
347:Miller-El v. Dretke
239:Snyder v. Louisiana
183:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
24:Snyder v. Louisiana
1058:Felkner v. Jackson
1042:Rivera v. Illinois
916:Batson v. Kentucky
836:Vasquez v. Hillery
829:Coleman v. Alabama
816:Hernandez v. Texas
656:Discrimination in
594:criminal procedure
452:Batson v. Kentucky
313:Batson v. Kentucky
306:Procedural history
265:Batson v. Kentucky
147:Associate Justices
1144:2008 in Louisiana
1111:
1110:
1107:
1106:
1100:were civil cases.
1084:
1083:
1066:Foster v. Chatman
896:Berghuis v. Smith
883:Duren v. Missouri
762:Norris v. Alabama
747:Rogers v. Alabama
705:Virginia v. Rives
646:
645:
620:McCleskey v. Kemp
235:
234:
1156:
1050:Thaler v. Haynes
970:Trevino v. Texas
809:Avery v. Georgia
803:Cassell v. Texas
778:Hale v. Kentucky
711:Neal v. Delaware
666:
652:
603:
590:equal protection
582:
575:
568:
559:
554:
548:
545:
539:
536:
530:
527:
521:
494:
491:
485:
482:
476:
473:
467:
448:
442:
441:
439:
437:
423:Lithwick, Dahlia
419:
293:African American
260:African American
254:cases. Justice
132:Court membership
117:1144 (2007).
33:
32:
21:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1103:
1080:
1026:Rice v. Collins
994:Purkett v. Elem
939:Ford v. Georgia
901:
842:
729:Carter v. Texas
685:
660:
642:
610:
597:
586:
552:
546:
543:
537:
534:
528:
525:
519:
503:
498:
497:
493:942 So. 2d 484.
492:
488:
483:
479:
474:
470:
449:
445:
435:
433:
421:
420:
416:
411:
399:
390:Clarence Thomas
368:
308:
278:
270:Clarence Thomas
185:
175:Clarence Thomas
173:
163:Anthony Kennedy
161:
151:John P. Stevens
107:State v. Snyder
93:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1162:
1160:
1152:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1116:
1115:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1102:
1101:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1078:
1070:
1062:
1054:
1046:
1038:
1030:
1022:
1014:
1006:
998:
990:
982:
974:
966:
958:
950:
946:Powers v. Ohio
942:
936:
932:Teague v. Lane
928:
920:
911:
909:
903:
902:
900:
899:
893:
887:
879:
871:
865:
859:
850:
848:
844:
843:
841:
840:
832:
826:
820:
812:
806:
800:
794:
788:
785:Smith v. Texas
782:
774:
766:
758:
750:
744:
738:
732:
726:
720:
714:
708:
702:
693:
691:
687:
686:
684:
683:
678:
672:
670:
662:
661:
658:jury selection
655:
648:
647:
644:
643:
641:
640:
632:
624:
615:
612:
611:
606:
599:
598:
588:United States
587:
585:
584:
577:
570:
562:
556:
555:
502:
501:External links
499:
496:
495:
486:
477:
468:
443:
413:
412:
410:
407:
406:
405:
398:
395:
367:
364:
338:for a writ of
307:
304:
277:
274:
248:jury selection
233:
232:
226:
225:
221:
220:
217:
213:
212:
209:
205:
204:
200:
199:
198:
197:
187:Stephen Breyer
159:Antonin Scalia
148:
145:
140:
134:
133:
129:
128:
124:
123:
119:
118:
104:
100:
99:
95:
94:
87:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1161:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1119:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1003:
999:
996:
995:
991:
988:
987:
983:
980:
979:
975:
972:
971:
967:
964:
963:
959:
956:
955:
951:
948:
947:
943:
940:
937:
934:
933:
929:
926:
925:
921:
918:
917:
913:
912:
910:
908:
904:
897:
894:
891:
888:
885:
884:
880:
877:
876:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
857:
856:
852:
851:
849:
845:
838:
837:
833:
830:
827:
824:
821:
818:
817:
813:
810:
807:
804:
801:
798:
795:
792:
791:Hill v. Texas
789:
786:
783:
780:
779:
775:
772:
771:
767:
764:
763:
759:
756:
755:
751:
748:
745:
742:
739:
736:
733:
730:
727:
724:
721:
718:
715:
712:
709:
706:
703:
700:
699:
695:
694:
692:
688:
682:
679:
677:
674:
673:
671:
667:
663:
659:
653:
649:
638:
637:
633:
630:
629:
625:
622:
621:
617:
616:
613:
609:
604:
600:
595:
591:
583:
578:
576:
571:
569:
564:
563:
560:
551:
542:
533:
524:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
500:
490:
487:
481:
478:
472:
469:
465:
462:
458:
454:
453:
447:
444:
436:September 19,
432:
428:
424:
418:
415:
408:
404:
401:
400:
396:
394:
391:
386:
384:
379:
377:
373:
365:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
343:
342:
337:
332:
329:
328:
327:nunc pro tunc
323:
319:
315:
314:
305:
303:
301:
296:
294:
289:
288:
283:
282:death penalty
275:
273:
271:
267:
266:
261:
257:
253:
252:death penalty
249:
245:
241:
240:
231:
227:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
203:Case opinions
201:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
146:
144:
141:
139:Chief Justice
138:
137:
135:
130:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
105:
101:
96:
91:
85:
84:
79:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1072:
1064:
1056:
1048:
1040:
1033:
1032:
1024:
1016:
1008:
1000:
992:
984:
976:
968:
960:
952:
944:
938:
930:
922:
914:
895:
889:
881:
873:
867:
861:
853:
834:
828:
822:
814:
808:
802:
796:
790:
784:
776:
768:
760:
752:
746:
740:
734:
728:
722:
716:
710:
704:
696:
634:
626:
618:
507:
489:
480:
471:
466: (1986).
450:
446:
434:. Retrieved
430:
417:
387:
383:Samuel Alito
380:
375:
369:
359:
355:
351:
345:
339:
333:
325:
321:
311:
309:
297:
285:
279:
263:
256:Samuel Alito
238:
237:
236:
224:Laws applied
195:Samuel Alito
190:
178:
171:David Souter
166:
154:
143:John Roberts
106:
98:Case history
81:
53:
15:
276:Trial court
272:dissented.
268:. Justice
1118:Categories
409:References
360:certiorari
341:certiorari
60:Docket no.
376:voir dire
352:Miller-El
287:Voir dire
90:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
1098:Edmonson
957:(1991)**
864:(1946)**
596:case law
506:Text of
397:See also
388:Justice
381:Justice
366:Decision
208:Majority
64:06-10119
1090:Glasser
858:(1942)*
669:History
523:Cornell
216:Dissent
122:Holding
1077:(2019)
1069:(2015)
1061:(2011)
1053:(2010)
1045:(2009)
1037:(2008)
1029:(2006)
1021:(2005)
1013:(2005)
1005:(2003)
997:(1995)
989:(1994)
981:(1992)
973:(1992)
965:(1991)
949:(1991)
941:(1991)
935:(1989)
927:(1987)
919:(1986)
898:(2010)
892:(1990)
886:(1979)
878:(1975)
870:(1946)
839:(1986)
831:(1967)
825:(1958)
819:(1954)
811:(1953)
805:(1950)
799:(1947)
793:(1942)
787:(1940)
781:(1938)
773:(1935)
765:(1935)
757:(1910)
749:(1904)
743:(1903)
737:(1903)
731:(1900)
725:(1896)
719:(1896)
713:(1881)
707:(1880)
701:(1880)
639:(2002)
631:(1996)
623:(1987)
553:
547:
544:
538:
535:
532:Justia
529:
526:
520:
455:,
356:Batson
322:Batson
193:
191:·
189:
181:
179:·
177:
169:
167:·
165:
157:
155:·
153:
1094:Thiel
514:
459:
431:Slate
113:
103:Prior
1096:and
592:and
516:U.S.
461:U.S.
438:2020
115:U.S.
83:more
75:U.S.
73:552
512:552
457:476
284:.
250:in
111:551
92:175
78:472
1120::
510:,
464:79
429:.
362:.
1088:*
581:e
574:t
567:v
440:.
86:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.