174:
62:(ECJ) have cast some doubt on the continuing validity of this doctrine. This is due in part to the fact that the ECJ did not feel that Dutch courts were competent to make predictions or judgments about the validity of patents granted outside the Netherlands, preferring to grant jurisdiction to the countries in which the patent was granted.
51:
and where the other defendants were part of a group of companies and acted based on a common business policy of this group (the "web"), regardless of the nation in which the disputed
215:
134:
254:
239:
76:
122:
208:
28:
234:
259:
249:
244:
59:
156:
201:
32:
116:
36:
101:
185:
71:
81:
24:
228:
181:
140:
40:
173:
48:
44:
103:
Cross-border injunctions in patent infringement cases: paradise lost?
52:
106:, Building and enforcing intellectual property value 2007, p172-175.
39:
cases. Under this doctrine, the Dutch courts would assume
189:
139:, E-newsletter Patent Law, Number 4, 22 December 2006,
158:
Is there an After-Life for Pan
European Injunctions?
136:Dutch cross-border injunctions after Gat v. Luk
209:
125:, March 2006. Consulted on February 29, 2008.
8:
216:
202:
118:Benelux: Latest Dutch spider developments
93:
7:
170:
168:
188:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
47:(the "spider") was located in the
16:Legal doctrine in Dutch patent law
14:
172:
77:Enforcement of European patents
255:Legal doctrines and principles
184:or of a European country is a
123:Managing Intellectual Property
1:
180:This article relating to the
43:only in cases where the main
161:, IPEG blog, March 27, 2008
276:
167:
60:European Court of Justice
33:cross-border injunctions
240:Law of the Netherlands
235:European patent law
37:patent infringement
260:European law stubs
197:
196:
58:Decisions by the
21:spider in the web
267:
250:Conflict of laws
245:Dutch patent law
218:
211:
204:
176:
169:
144:
132:
126:
113:
107:
100:Jochen Buhling,
98:
29:Dutch patent law
275:
274:
270:
269:
268:
266:
265:
264:
225:
224:
223:
222:
165:
153:
151:Further reading
148:
147:
133:
129:
115:Bas Verschoor,
114:
110:
99:
95:
90:
72:Brussels Regime
68:
17:
12:
11:
5:
273:
271:
263:
262:
257:
252:
247:
242:
237:
227:
226:
221:
220:
213:
206:
198:
195:
194:
177:
163:
162:
152:
149:
146:
145:
127:
108:
92:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:Unitary patent
79:
74:
67:
64:
25:legal doctrine
23:doctrine is a
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
272:
261:
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
238:
236:
233:
232:
230:
219:
214:
212:
207:
205:
200:
199:
193:
191:
187:
183:
182:law of Europe
178:
175:
171:
166:
160:
159:
155:
154:
150:
142:
138:
137:
131:
128:
124:
120:
119:
112:
109:
105:
104:
97:
94:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
69:
65:
63:
61:
56:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
190:expanding it
179:
164:
157:
141:Nauta Dutilh
135:
130:
117:
111:
102:
96:
57:
55:was issued.
41:jurisdiction
20:
18:
49:Netherlands
229:Categories
88:References
31:governing
143:web site.
45:defendant
66:See also
53:patent
186:stub
19:The
35:in
27:in
231::
121:,
217:e
210:t
203:v
192:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
