463:
442:
374:
353:
259:
473:
249:
222:
191:
325:
691:, I hear everything from to to and we need to choose one for our transcription). I'm sure many Americans have a merger of /ɛŋ/ and /æŋ/, though I can't remember if literature I've seen recently confirms it. Maybe check "Bag, beg, bagel" (Freeman 2014) or "The Bag that Scott Bought" (Benson et al. 2011).
619:
here seem to feature over-correction - the inherent effect of a velar nasal coda is taken out, such that /æŋg/ and /æŋk/ are something like and , which could leave speakers of varieties without any unpredictably distinct /æ/+/ŋ/ allophone(much of the eastern US + most places outside North
America as
649:
2. I might be inclined to agree that ash-tensing before eng and /g/ should be treated separately, given that other vowels shift in those environments as well, I'd have to see what different reliable sources say. Maybe this depends on dialect/accent? ie in some dialects ash-tensing before eng and/or
629:
3. Regardless, the transcription , both here and on
Wiktionary, is somewhat problematic, because that is the position pre-/ŋ/ tensing accents typically give to /ɛ/, while /æ/ gets (or potentially lower with the Californian and Canadian shifts putting the base allophone of /æ/ at .) To be fair, the
598:
Southern american is highly stigmatized along with african american vernacular, so for status the raising is working more often than for natural or random totally shifts--this raising not being as high as great lakes thats more near KIT vowel. rather, southern is at /ei/ or /e/ near merging or
626:
2. Since the varieties which do have special shifts before /ŋ/ or before /ŋ/ and /g/ tend to be the ones which have them across the whole front vowel set, and this results in raising, not lowering diphthongs, giving /ŋ/ its own sound samples and table row at all is misleading.
683:
2. I may not understand your problem here exactly. Doesn't the chart on this very page, "/æ/ raising in North
American English", already answer this problem? The only dialect that shows /æ/ raising before /ŋ/ in tandem with all environments generally is the Great Lakes
645:
1. I agree that those pronunciations sound unnatural. It would probably be better if we had pronunciations from someone whose native accent didn't tense or shift /æ/ in that environment, alongside pronunciations from someone who does natively shift /æ/ before
713:
are some alternative recordings I've just made. I can add them in if everyone finds it preferable to no change or removal, though clipping somebody else's file feels iffy to me so we might want to get new audio for the tensed pronunciation
735:
I think there should be a footnote like, "Before voiced velars, much of the
Midwest, West, and Canada approaches a merger of /æ/ and /ɛ/ with /eɪ/, and sometimes complementarily /ɪ/ with /i/. See those varieties' pages for more
739:
3. I'll look through those sources and more for which particular qualities the front vowels are arriving at in different accents - California's probably the best continental bellwether. Considering how /iŋ/(or /in/) for
602:
So social side should be in the article. Same for why backing was lost in new england, as it likely was seen rural, but this reasearch i think is harder found.Yoandri
Dominguez Garcia 18:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
671:
1. I believe the speaker is being slow and slightly exaggerative in his articulations to make distinctions clearer, which may be affecting the surrounding consonants (I, too, notice the odd /g/ at the end of
551:
The usual convention is that linguistic example material should be italicized, not the prose commenting on it. The main table currently uses the opposite convention. Any opposition to switching this around?
153:
424:
787:
802:
782:
414:
147:
807:
680:
sounds ok to my /æ/-unraised self, if a bit self-aware and deliberate). For any newcomer to the idea of /æ/ raising, these audio files seem, to me, "good enough!"
334:
232:
777:
315:
305:
729:- Pre-velar tensing substitutes the qualities of existing base phonemes whereas /æ/ tensing otherwise results in nuclei only comparable to other allophones
390:
817:
797:
529:
519:
79:
792:
650:/g/ clearly patterns with ash-tensing in other environments, while in other dialects shifting before eng and /g/ is best considered separately.
381:
358:
281:
44:
772:
85:
495:
812:
579:
749:
744:
as one example is rapidly gaining among young people all over, North
American English pre-velar tensing might merit its own article.
635:
272:
227:
486:
447:
99:
30:
630:
only potential minimal pairs involve uncommon loans, but we are talking about narrow transcriptions of a non-phonemic system.
104:
20:
74:
202:
168:
65:
135:
745:
723:- New England doesn't have pre-/ŋ/ tensing but I think we'd agree only 1 column for the nasal system is ideal
631:
583:
720:- The second paragraph of the lead doesn't include the closing variant in its list of tense /æ/ realizations
109:
129:
208:
687:
3. Looking at sources couldn't hurt, but at least phonetically seems about right for most
Americans (
575:
125:
190:
559:
161:
55:
494:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
389:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
280:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
710:
264:
70:
175:
706:
696:
658:
462:
441:
51:
386:
653:
3. I'd have to see what reliable sources say when it comes to narrow IPA transcriptions.
553:
478:
141:
766:
692:
654:
373:
352:
688:
621:
277:
717:
2. My problems with having separate /g/ and /ŋ/ table rows and /ŋ/ sound clips:
258:
472:
468:
254:
491:
385:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the
753:
700:
662:
639:
587:
562:
324:
248:
221:
732:- Outside the South, conditions besides voiced velar tense only /æ/
184:
15:
323:
24:
160:
572:
This article sure could use some recorded examples!
490:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
276:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
8:
788:Theoretical Linguistics Task Force articles
726:- NYC's all voiced stops rule is obfuscated
573:
436:
347:
216:
803:Low-importance English Language articles
783:B-Class Theoretical Linguistics articles
438:
349:
218:
188:
399:Knowledge:WikiProject English Language
808:WikiProject English Language articles
402:Template:WikiProject English Language
7:
484:This article is within the scope of
379:This article is within the scope of
270:This article is within the scope of
778:Low-importance Linguistics articles
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
335:Theoretical Linguistics Task Force
14:
818:Low-importance sociology articles
798:B-Class English Language articles
290:Knowledge:WikiProject Linguistics
793:WikiProject Linguistics articles
611:1. The sound files for untensed
471:
461:
440:
372:
351:
293:Template:WikiProject Linguistics
257:
247:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
524:This article has been rated as
504:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology
419:This article has been rated as
310:This article has been rated as
620:far as I'm aware), as well as
507:Template:WikiProject Sociology
1:
498:and see a list of open tasks.
393:and see a list of open tasks.
332:This article is supported by
284:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
773:B-Class Linguistics articles
588:09:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
382:WikiProject English Language
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
834:
813:B-Class sociology articles
563:13:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
530:project's importance scale
316:project's importance scale
523:
456:
418:
405:English Language articles
367:
331:
309:
242:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
754:23:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
701:04:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
663:20:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
640:18:44, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
273:WikiProject Linguistics
233:Theoretical Linguistics
328:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
487:WikiProject Sociology
327:
100:Neutral point of view
594:Social things forgot
296:Linguistics articles
105:No original research
746:Célestine-Edelweiß
632:Célestine-Edelweiß
510:sociology articles
329:
265:Linguistics portal
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
607:Some /ŋ/ problems
590:
578:comment added by
544:
543:
540:
539:
536:
535:
435:
434:
431:
430:
346:
345:
342:
341:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
825:
624:a bit confused.
568:Examples needed!
556:
512:
511:
508:
505:
502:
481:
476:
475:
465:
458:
457:
452:
444:
437:
425:importance scale
407:
406:
403:
400:
397:
396:English Language
387:English language
376:
369:
368:
363:
359:English Language
355:
348:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
267:
262:
261:
251:
244:
243:
238:
235:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
763:
762:
609:
596:
570:
554:
549:
509:
506:
503:
500:
499:
477:
470:
450:
404:
401:
398:
395:
394:
361:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
263:
256:
236:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
831:
829:
821:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
765:
764:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
737:
733:
730:
727:
724:
721:
718:
715:
685:
681:
666:
665:
651:
647:
628:
625:
608:
605:
599:shoving out.
595:
592:
569:
566:
548:
545:
542:
541:
538:
537:
534:
533:
526:Low-importance
522:
516:
515:
513:
496:the discussion
483:
482:
479:Society portal
466:
454:
453:
451:Low‑importance
445:
433:
432:
429:
428:
421:Low-importance
417:
411:
410:
408:
391:the discussion
377:
365:
364:
362:Low‑importance
356:
344:
343:
340:
339:
330:
320:
319:
312:Low-importance
308:
302:
301:
299:
282:the discussion
269:
268:
252:
240:
239:
237:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
770:
768:
755:
751:
747:
743:
738:
736:information."
734:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
679:
675:
670:
669:
668:
667:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
642:
641:
637:
633:
623:
618:
614:
606:
604:
600:
593:
591:
589:
585:
581:
580:178.12.42.139
577:
567:
565:
564:
561:
557:
546:
531:
527:
521:
518:
517:
514:
497:
493:
489:
488:
480:
474:
469:
467:
464:
460:
459:
455:
449:
446:
443:
439:
426:
422:
416:
413:
412:
409:
392:
388:
384:
383:
378:
375:
371:
370:
366:
360:
357:
354:
350:
337:
336:
326:
322:
321:
317:
313:
307:
304:
303:
300:
283:
279:
275:
274:
266:
260:
255:
253:
250:
246:
245:
241:
234:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
741:
677:
673:
616:
612:
610:
601:
597:
574:— Preceding
571:
550:
525:
485:
420:
380:
333:
311:
271:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
287:Linguistics
278:linguistics
228:Linguistics
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:/æ/ raising
767:Categories
678:thank you
676:, though
617:thank you
555:Trɔpʏliʊm
501:Sociology
492:sociology
448:Sociology
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
684:dialect.
613:language
576:unsigned
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
693:Wolfdog
655:Erinius
547:Italics
528:on the
423:on the
314:on the
199:B-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
205:scale.
126:Google
622:Danes
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
750:talk
742:-ing
714:too.
711:here
709:and
707:Here
697:talk
689:here
674:hang
659:talk
646:/ŋ/.
636:talk
615:and
584:talk
560:blah
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
705:1.
520:Low
415:Low
306:Low
176:TWL
769::
752:)
699:)
661:)
638:)
586:)
558:•
552:--
231::
156:)
54:;
748:(
695:(
657:(
634:(
582:(
532:.
427:.
338:.
318:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
