993:, where there was opposition to even merging two units with the same name from the same war.) If the regiment truly existed from 1865 to 1898, there is currently no content about a unit with this name during the interwar period on WP, so it's hard to justify including the 1898 unit with the ACW unit on those grounds. In fact, the way the existing articles are written implies that there wasn't a unit with the same name during the interwar period. I guess my current view is that if versions of the unit with this name during the interwar period were notable, then a stub could be created, the dab page then resurrected at
422:
628:
513:
482:
616:
454:
523:
652:
438:
711:
202:
307:
997:), and then a merge could be reconsidered, though my guess is a merge would be met with some opposition or at least hesitation. Alternatively, I think it would be fine to add a sourced mention at either current article that units using the same name existed after the mustering out of the ACW volunteer unit and before the formation of the 1898 unit (if reliable sources can attest to this).
379:
368:
357:
701:
680:
265:
233:
346:
335:
961:
I probably should have made a better case for this at the time, but one issue I have with leaving out the 1898 article from the merge is the fact that these regiments existed continuously from the end of the Civil War through the
Spanish-American War as militia or national guard regiments. By making
966:
in 1886 was the 1st
Wisconsin Infantry Regiment -- and there's no clear place for that linkage to live since neither the Civil War or Spanish War articles would cover the year 1886. I'm sure I could find other examples where these regiments were involved in notable guard activity in the inter-war
906:
the disambiguation page currently there, and the 1898 article would remain separate. I agree the
Spanish-American War-era unit should not be merged. The combined Civil War article would be the clear primary topic, as the 1898 regiment did not see any combat. A hatnote to the 1898 article would
429:
243:
661:
496:
445:
247:
164:
839:. While these were separate units with a short gap between the mustering out of the 3-month unit and mustering in of the 3-year unit, the units share the same commander. I think this is a borderline case, similar to the
641:
492:
461:
251:
880:
I agree with the suggested merge but don't agree about adding the 1898 organization, the two units alike solely in name and state of origin. I suggest the disambiguator "(1861)" to mirror the 1898 usage.
1066:
1026:
1036:
1031:
1041:
989:, I see your point, but there certainly was consensus against merging in the 1898 article, because while sharing a name and a perceived lineage, the units were really different entities. (See
812:. The two Civil War unit articles will be merged and then moved to the base name as the primary topic; the 1898 unit will not be merged or moved and a hatnote will be used for disambiguation.
158:
55:
553:
962:
the articles specific to only those wars, we're kind of orphaning any of the activity of these regiments (Wisconsin 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) in between the two wars. For example, the
866:
as well. Obviously the
Spanish-American War was decades later, but I think it would be fine to just include the Spanish-American War service as a section of a larger article. --
570:
320:
277:
1046:
1051:
1061:
1021:
606:
596:
306:
990:
1071:
1056:
560:
1081:
832:
769:
759:
90:
836:
840:
565:
1076:
863:
844:
272:
238:
179:
281:
96:
146:
735:
536:
487:
994:
967:
period. I'm not going to re-open the merge conversation, but wanted to offer it up if you think it warrants further consideration. --
548:
140:
899:
724:
685:
110:
41:
35:
898:
To be clear, the proposal is that the the two Civil War articles (3 months and 3 years) would be merged together and moved to
115:
31:
843:. If merged, I would move the merged article to the base name by usurping the dab page, as a hatnote would be sufficient to
136:
544:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
945:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
85:
17:
213:
186:
76:
633:
201:
152:
276:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
120:
421:
972:
929:
871:
219:
903:
847:, a unit that did not see any action. If kept separate, should the 3 year unit be the primary topic?
528:
172:
66:
734:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1002:
912:
852:
817:
81:
512:
481:
1006:
976:
963:
935:
916:
907:
suffice for disambiguation, and the current disambiguation page would no longer be necessary.
890:
886:
875:
856:
821:
62:
984:
968:
924:
867:
716:
862:
I mildly agree with the merge proposal, and I'd also say we should consider merging in
615:
453:
1015:
998:
956:
908:
848:
813:
541:
882:
651:
437:
922:
I'm all for the merge so long as the
Spanish-American War unit is not merged.
706:
623:
518:
730:
540:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
728:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of
700:
679:
264:
232:
662:
WikiProject
Military history - U.S. military history task force
195:
26:
650:
642:
WikiProject
Military history - American Civil War task force
614:
452:
436:
420:
305:
18:
Talk:1st
Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry Regiment (3 Months)
841:
recent merge of the 1st West Virginia Infantry Regiment
171:
1067:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1027:
Start-Class North American military history articles
801:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
318:
This article has been checked against the following
1037:
Start-Class United States military history articles
1032:
North American military history task force articles
403:
317:
1042:United States military history task force articles
995:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment (disambiguation)
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
804:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
185:
8:
991:the merge discussion about the 12th Indiana
199:
833:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment (3 Months)
674:
476:
430:North American military history task force
400:
314:
227:
837:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment (3 Years)
446:United States military history task force
270:This article is within the scope of the
1047:Start-Class American Civil War articles
676:
478:
229:
1052:American Civil War task force articles
864:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment (1898)
845:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment (1898)
290:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
280:. To use this banner, please see the
1062:Low-importance United States articles
1022:Start-Class military history articles
293:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
795:The following discussion is closed.
722:This article is within the scope of
534:This article is within the scope of
581:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
218:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
1072:WikiProject United States articles
1057:Start-Class United States articles
808:The result of this discussion was
584:Template:WikiProject United States
25:
1082:Low-importance Wisconsin articles
950:Addendum to the merge discussion
941:The discussion above is closed.
709:
699:
678:
626:
521:
511:
480:
377:
366:
355:
344:
333:
263:
231:
200:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
900:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment
764:This article has been rated as
744:Knowledge:WikiProject Wisconsin
601:This article has been rated as
36:1st Wisconsin Infantry Regiment
1077:Start-Class Wisconsin articles
747:Template:WikiProject Wisconsin
1:
738:and see a list of open tasks.
659:This article is supported by
639:This article is supported by
462:American Civil War task force
53:Put new text under old text.
273:Military history WikiProject
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1098:
936:14:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
917:19:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
891:19:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
876:19:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
857:20:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
770:project's importance scale
607:project's importance scale
338:Referencing and citation:
1007:22:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
977:19:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
822:02:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
763:
694:
658:
634:American Civil War portal
622:
600:
537:WikiProject United States
506:
460:
444:
428:
399:
296:military history articles
258:
226:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
943:Please do not modify it.
798:Please do not modify it.
542:United States of America
404:Associated task forces:
349:Coverage and accuracy:
655:
619:
587:United States articles
457:
441:
425:
382:Supporting materials:
310:
208:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
725:WikiProject Wisconsin
654:
618:
456:
440:
424:
309:
111:Neutral point of view
529:United States portal
116:No original research
831:I propose to merge
555:Articles Requested!
371:Grammar and style:
324:for B-class status:
750:Wisconsin articles
656:
620:
458:
442:
426:
311:
278:list of open tasks
252:American Civil War
214:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
964:Bay View massacre
784:
783:
780:
779:
776:
775:
673:
672:
669:
668:
475:
474:
471:
470:
467:
466:
395:
394:
351:criterion not met
340:criterion not met
282:full instructions
194:
193:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1089:
988:
960:
934:
932:
927:
800:
752:
751:
748:
745:
742:
719:
717:Wisconsin portal
714:
713:
712:
703:
696:
695:
690:
682:
675:
636:
631:
630:
629:
589:
588:
585:
582:
579:
531:
526:
525:
524:
515:
508:
507:
502:
499:
497:Military history
484:
477:
411:
401:
385:
381:
380:
374:
370:
369:
363:
359:
358:
352:
348:
347:
341:
337:
336:
315:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
287:Military history
267:
260:
259:
254:
239:Military history
235:
228:
211:
205:
204:
196:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1012:
1011:
982:
954:
952:
947:
946:
930:
925:
923:
829:
796:
789:
749:
746:
743:
740:
739:
715:
710:
708:
688:
632:
627:
625:
586:
583:
580:
577:
576:
575:
561:Become a Member
527:
522:
520:
500:
490:
409:
383:
378:
372:
367:
361:
356:
350:
345:
339:
334:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
241:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1095:
1093:
1085:
1084:
1079:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1049:
1044:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1024:
1014:
1013:
1010:
1009:
951:
948:
940:
939:
938:
896:
895:
894:
893:
835:together with
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
791:
790:
788:
787:Merge proposal
785:
782:
781:
778:
777:
774:
773:
766:Low-importance
762:
756:
755:
753:
736:the discussion
721:
720:
704:
692:
691:
689:Low‑importance
683:
671:
670:
667:
666:
657:
647:
646:
638:
637:
621:
611:
610:
603:Low-importance
599:
593:
592:
590:
574:
573:
568:
563:
558:
551:
549:Template Usage
545:
533:
532:
516:
504:
503:
501:Low‑importance
485:
473:
472:
469:
468:
465:
464:
459:
449:
448:
443:
433:
432:
427:
417:
416:
414:
412:
406:
405:
397:
396:
393:
392:
390:
388:
387:
386:
375:
364:
353:
342:
328:
327:
325:
312:
302:
301:
299:
268:
256:
255:
236:
224:
223:
217:
206:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1094:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1073:
1070:
1068:
1065:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1017:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
986:
981:
980:
979:
978:
974:
970:
965:
958:
949:
944:
937:
933:
928:
921:
920:
919:
918:
914:
910:
905:
901:
892:
888:
884:
879:
878:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
806:
805:
802:
799:
793:
792:
786:
771:
767:
761:
758:
757:
754:
737:
733:
732:
727:
726:
718:
707:
705:
702:
698:
697:
693:
687:
684:
681:
677:
664:
663:
653:
649:
648:
644:
643:
635:
624:
617:
613:
612:
608:
604:
598:
595:
594:
591:
578:United States
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
556:
552:
550:
547:
546:
543:
539:
538:
530:
519:
517:
514:
510:
509:
505:
498:
494:
489:
488:United States
486:
483:
479:
463:
455:
451:
450:
447:
439:
435:
434:
431:
423:
419:
418:
415:
413:
408:
407:
402:
398:
391:
389:
384:criterion met
376:
373:criterion met
365:
362:criterion met
354:
343:
332:
331:
330:
329:
326:
323:
322:
316:
313:
308:
304:
303:
300:
283:
279:
275:
274:
269:
266:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
248:United States
245:
244:North America
240:
237:
234:
230:
225:
221:
215:
207:
203:
198:
197:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
953:
942:
897:
830:
809:
803:
797:
794:
765:
729:
723:
660:
640:
602:
566:Project Talk
554:
535:
319:
271:
220:WikiProjects
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
985:Asdasdasdff
969:Asdasdasdff
926:Yungtrotsky
868:Asdasdasdff
360:Structure:
210:Start-class
159:free images
42:not a forum
1016:Categories
741:Wisconsin
731:Wisconsin
686:Wisconsin
493:Civil War
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
999:Mdewman6
957:Mdewman6
909:Mdewman6
904:usurping
849:Mdewman6
814:Mdewman6
321:criteria
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
883:BusterD
768:on the
605:on the
165:WP refs
153:scholar
931:(talk)
571:Alerts
216:scale.
137:Google
810:merge
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1003:talk
973:talk
913:talk
887:talk
872:talk
853:talk
818:talk
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
902:by
760:Low
597:Low
187:TWL
1018::
1005:)
975:)
915:)
889:)
874:)
855:)
820:)
495:/
491::
410:/
250:/
246:/
242::
167:)
65:;
1001:(
987::
983:@
971:(
959::
955:@
911:(
885:(
870:(
851:(
816:(
772:.
665:.
645:.
609:.
284:.
222::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
