Knowledge

Talk:2005 Al-Aimmah Bridge disaster

Source đź“ť

871:"insurrection" (protest against or attempt to overthrow or defy a regime) or as "terrorism" (intimidating a population in order to sway its attitudes and plans). They indicated it was vengeance against Shi'ites for alleged attacks against Sunnis and that it was religious persecution for their supposed apostacy. That does not make them terrorists any more than were the people who wiped out Christian communities deemed to be heretical a few hundred years ago in a sort of religious genocide. "Terrorism" has recently swollen to become a pejorative catch-all and "insurgency" has become a blanket term that seems to cover every Arab or Moslem in Iraq who is actively, especially violently, working against U.S. wishes even if he or she is not primarily interested in frustrating, humiliating, expelling or destroying the U.S. The argument over whether the people who perpetrated the mortar attack are justified or not, right or wrong, good or bad, terrorists, partisans, zealots or whatever is irrelevant to the Knowledge article. 767:
insurgency in Iraq don't have to play by those rules to be engaged in legitimate conflict (however reprehensible attacking civilians is to our modern sensibilities). I would have as much reason to change the text "terrorists" to "insurgents" because I see it as a less loaded term (and a more accruate one), and frankly we don't have any real detailed information about the nature or identity of the mortar attackers, like their political or group affiliation. I changed it to "attackers" so that we don't have to get engaged in a revert war. If evidence comes in later indicating their motive or allegiance, we can change it then, when we know what we are talking about.
590:. That's why it has to be included in Knowledge. Iraq's tragedy is that it have been torn to peices by Islam. Just 1400 years ago Iraq was half Christian / half Zarahustrian, and the shiite cult is basicly a revival of their original Christian faith in a distorted way. These poor Iraqi's were lead to believe that they were responsible for the death of Mohammed's grandson and torture themselves every year to relieve the guilt that they never earned. Iraq is dead along with the 1000 who died on the bridge. But it has been dead for centuries anyway. It's soul still roams the land but it's body is in continuous decay. ( from the mouth of a contemporary eye witness ) 1221:
stampede—is cogent in the Knowledge article. Similarly, the earlier explosions near the destination mosque, the rumors of poisoned water and food being offered by people in the neighborhood before the the stampede, and the efforts by neighborhood people to rescue the pilgrims are an important part of the history both of the stampede and of the invasion. However, contrasting the stampede death toll with statistics of other events occurring since an arbitrary date (the start of the current invasion) fails to provide useful perspective and certainly does not belong in the opening paragraph of the article. Out it goes (again).
586:
victims. These poor people who as I heard came mostly from Sadr city ( previously known as al-Thawra district ie revolution and later Saddam city later now Sadr city ) are poor naive people, who thought that by going on this bridge they are practicing a religious freedom that was denied for decades...ironic because religious freedom is an oximoron when it comes to their religion ( not mine anymore ) ....this is the begining of Iraq's
911:, which we rightly have a big article on, but if the estimates I'm hearing are correct and it's anything from several hundred to a few thousand, then this is of a similar order of magnitude. As the biggest single loss of life in Iraq since the invasion, even with all the current problems there this will be remembered for a long time to come. I don't see anything wrong with its inclusion in Knowledge. — 273: 252: 221: 190: 1349: 372: 362: 341: 450: 1294: 803:
I have edited the entire section to render this discussion moot. Readers of any intelligence are perfectly capable of figuring out for themselves whether an Al-Qaeda linked group that attacks crowds of religious pilgrims with mortars consists of terrorists or not; it isn't really necessary to decide
1136:
I have to concur with those saying it's not encyclopedic or terribly notable. Perhaps if it were a situation in which the people responding said something out of character - a country known to have conflict with Iraq expressing remorse for example - then it might be notable. Countries humanitarian
940:
It was a disaster. It doesn't matter if it was terrorism or not. It's an event that is being reported internationally. If Hurricane Katrina and the 9/11 Attacks get their own entries, the Stampede gets its own as well. WikiNews covers current events. Knowledge covers history. This is going to become
766:
A lot of this depends on whether you see the insurgents in Iraq as fighting a legitimate conflict or as terrorists. I know that attacking civilian targets is frowned upon by The Geneva Conventions and other basic standards of conflict as adhered to by the states that invent them, but members of the
1211:
Wrong. It should not have been re-added. No one responded to the question about being "wrong" because the issue was already discussed on this talk page. Please refer to the postings on this page under "Encyclopedic". Knowledge eschews sensationalism in favor of a "long" historical perspective. The
1106:
I often do a bit of editing of current events articles, or at least just have a look and see how they're coming along. The "world reaction" quotes that often appear are totally inappropriate in every case. They make the article look like a news story and represent a fundamental misunderstanding of
1220:
had a known "trigger". The crowd in question may have been particularly edgy, government preparations for the pilgrimage may have been inadequate, and passage across the bridge may have been constricted because of US military actitivies, so that discussion of the pre-conditions—the context of the
870:
The mortar attack of 2 hours prior to the stampede is relevant in having predisposed the crowd to fearing that a further attack on Shi'ite pilgrims was imminent. In any case, the group claiming responsibility did not depict that attack as "insurgency" (part of an effort to replace a regime) or as
776:
Who cares what their political or group affiliation is? Terrorism is about means, not ends. Armed rebellion against government is not terrorism by default, but intentional targeting of civilians is, no matter what their politics. We have all the detailed information we need about them: they
585:
This bridge is walking distance from where I used to live. In fact you could see it from our doorstep. I crossed this bridge many times, in the good old days when religion was a ghost. The bridge is certainly not 30 meters high! 9 meters I would agree. It's painful to read what happened to the
777:
deliberately targeted civilians. Ergo, they are terrorists. As far as "modern sensibilities", I'm going to take a stand and say that deliberately targeting civilians is objectively wrong, and that our revulsion against it isn't some passing fad. Peddle moral relativism somewhere else. --
1086:
The section on "World reaction" adds nothing encyclopedic… just totally predictable almost ceremonial expressions of sorrow, condolence and/or condemnation. Unless the "world" reacts in some surprising or effective manner, this section should be deleted.
717:
Unforuntately, many words in this part of the English language vocabulary have taken a distorted common meaning as a result of political events of recent years. You are correct. By definition, such an act is terrorism (as opposed to
153: 485: 743:
being especially notable.), when describing terrorism. People who fire mortars into a corwd of people for a political purpose or to create fear are terrorists. Enough with this post modern moral equivalence.
1212:
count of other deaths possibly attributable to the latest invasion of Iraq is not relevant to this stampede, so no comparison is appropriate. Whether a stampede occurs in a large, tightly-packed crowd is a
1174:
of acts of terrorism, but I don't think the EU, Nato, or Iran accused all those thousands of panicking people of being terrorists. Someone familiar with what those bodies actually said please change it.
1109:
The Syrian government and people express their sympathy to Iraqis and to the families of the victims, and they wait for the day when security, stability and progress reign in the country.
147: 44: 1400: 323: 313: 1420: 546:
I've edited the article to reflect this. The 30 foot figure sounds much more accurate - from the photos of the bridge, it is most *definitely* not a 295 foot high bridge. —
1395: 1111:" These bland statements are always churned out by world leaders and everyone else in situations like this. As the anon says above, this is yawnsomely un-notable. — 571: 1143:
Being bold. Here is the removed 'world reaction'. If any seems unusual, put it back in. If any seems quoteworthy to be saved for 100 years, put it in wikiquotes.
289: 1390: 1120:
I couldn't agree more. These bland words are not real reactions, they are just diplomatic protocol. This relatively large section doesn't add a thing. --
79: 1041:
This bridge is not famous enough to be in the title, and from what I know, this is the only bridge stampede in Baghdad's history of encyclopedic merit.
280: 257: 1107:
what an encyclopedia article should be. They could be moved to Wikiquote or Wikinews if you're really keen on them, but have you even read them? "
1103:
In a news article, world reaction would be appropriate. In an encyclopedia, that every leader said it was a Bad Thing is yawnsomely un-notable.
1410: 428: 418: 168: 85: 1271: 135: 958:
I find it utterly absurd that anyone might suggest that a currentn event involving the death of a thousand people is not encyclopaedic. --
1068:? If reputable organsations are saying that this is an act of terrorism, then it would be good to back that up with quotes or links. -- 1014:
Hmm, the count seemed to have went up about 200 since my last visit to this page. This was a pretty interesting attack if you ask me. --
605: 1193:. " has been removed. I would have thought this quite important, and worthy of inclusion on the opening paragraph.. why am I wrong? -- 1415: 1405: 1157: 947: 841:, cable news, or vapid political bloggery; an encyclopedia article should simply state the facts in the plainest language possible. 506:
It is said the bridge was 30 meters high over the river, so most people were killed instantly upon impact on water or the riverbed.
921:
If it was an accidental Mecca-type stampede, then it's not encyclopedic, but this has hints of terrorism, so it's worth including.
201: 501: 129: 1243: 394: 99: 30: 790:
article can't decide on a standard definition, it may be safer not to use the term here and just move this discussion to the
104: 24: 20: 999:
Easy! I was only asking a question - it's not like I was submitting this to VfD (or AfD as we now know it) or anything... -
125: 1170:"The European Union, NATO, and Iran all condemned the stampede as an act of terrorism." Ahem, maybe they said it was the 466: 74: 232: 1137:
responses are also fairly notable, but mere quotes that express empathy kind of go without saying. Just my opinion --
574:
makes no mention of a collapse, and many articles are saying that people jumped from the bridge to save themselves. --
904: 175: 65: 1129:
No, this is important. Even if they are bland statements, there are notable, historic documents and encyclopedic. --
967: 462: 385: 346: 941:
a notable event in Iraq history, as officials have said pilgrimages need to be organized better in the future.
220: 599: 900: 704:
Isn't the intentional targetting of civilians a cut and dry example of terrorism? Or is this word becoming
141: 109: 991: 1272:
https://web.archive.org/20060112093523/http://www.forbes.com:80/work/feeds/afx/2005/08/31/afx2199216.html
1042: 922: 895:
I find that a somewhat surprising comment, Ta bu. We have articles on much smaller stampede-type events (
1326: 1306:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1152: 942: 896: 595: 238: 1202: 1194: 609: 626: 526: 206: 1000: 886: 1359: 1368: 1275: 1138: 285: 161: 55: 393:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
288:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1372: 1217: 1213: 745: 507: 70: 1307: 1151:
Has an exact number of deaths been released yet? The article has said up to 1000 for days now.
1253: 1121: 971: 908: 851: 838: 768: 696: 679: 51: 633:
also reports 7 dead and 36 injured. Furthermore, are we comfortable with the use of the word
1376: 1334: 1322: 1225: 1206: 1179: 1124: 1115: 1091: 1072: 1045: 1030: 1003: 925: 915: 889: 875: 854: 845: 832: 823: 798: 781: 771: 760: 730: 712: 699: 682: 653: 613: 578: 559: 550: 541: 521: 1314: 1261: 1189:
Twice something like "It was the biggest loss of life in Iraq in one day since the US-led
663: 473: 966:
I know, about 1000 people died in it. That's only 1/3 of the people who died during the
1112: 959: 912: 842: 820: 791: 514: 1313:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1384: 1176: 1015: 829: 757: 736: 556: 547: 819:
In the long run, the facts are far more convincing than any amount of purple prose.
1222: 1130: 1097: 1088: 1079: 1052: 1022:
No evidence has yet been noted to indicate that the stampede was the result of any
872: 1355: 638: 630: 518: 377: 189: 1069: 1027: 931: 795: 778: 727: 709: 650: 575: 538: 367: 272: 251: 666:
attack was part of an ongoing insurgency, not a terrorist incident, like the
787: 692: 688: 671: 659: 646: 196: 1216:; i.e., the event is not wholly determined by the environment even if the 1190: 705: 1258:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
361: 340: 1354:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on
1301:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
667: 477: 837:
I agree. Unnecessary rhetorical flourishes are better reserved for
1266:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
675: 390: 1276:
http://www.forbes.com/work/feeds/afx/2005/08/31/afx2199216.html
1343: 740: 444: 214: 184: 15: 1096:
No, should not be deleted. That´s even the world reaction. --
1281:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
930:
Since when is "terrorism" a prerequisite for encyclopedic?
448: 722:, I suppose). However, you then enter a debate around the 555:
Of course, 30 meters is just under 100 feet, not 295. *g*
570:
Do we have a reference for the supposed bridge collapse?
1242:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1247: 907:). I don't know what the final death toll will be from 735:
Unfortuneatly some media sources have become afraid of
885:
Isn't this a news story, better suited to Wikinews? -
160: 637:
to describe those who carried out the mortar attack?
195:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge's
389:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 284:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 695:? That way it doesn't need to go back and forth. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 174: 8: 1401:Low-importance Disaster management articles 218: 1421:Knowledge requested photographs in Baghdad 502:What are the revenue shares for mobile TV? 335: 246: 476:may be able to locate suitable images on 298:Knowledge:WikiProject Disaster management 1396:Start-Class Disaster management articles 301:Template:WikiProject Disaster management 1037:Change title to Baghdad bridge stampede 337: 248: 629:, as having killed 7 people, not 16. 7: 1391:Selected anniversaries (August 2008) 383:This article is within the scope of 278:This article is within the scope of 724:intentional targetting of civilians 237:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1064:Can we get any references for the 14: 1246:. Please take a moment to review 1197:\ 10:12, September 7, 2005 (UTC) 687:How about "attackers" instead of 645:and other sites may use the term 1347: 1292: 850:Good changes. Thanks Aquillion. 594:Preceding unsigned comment from 370: 360: 339: 271: 250: 219: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1244:2005 Al-Aaimmah bridge stampede 1201:Right then.. I'll re-add it. -- 1162:21:14, September 3, 2005 (UTC) 1133:18:02, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 1100:12:25, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 962:15:57, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 726:on all sides of a conflict. -- 423:This article has been rated as 318:This article has been rated as 281:WikiProject Disaster management 1226:16:03, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 1207:14:33, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 1082:07:10, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 1055:07:21, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 996:19:45, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 952:11:40, September 1, 2005 (UTC) 25:2005 Al-Aimmah Bridge disaster 1: 1180:04:11, 4 September 2005 (UTC) 1125:15:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1116:14:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1092:08:13, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1073:02:08, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1046:00:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1031:01:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 1018:23:32, August 31, 2005 (UTC) 1004:07:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 926:00:45, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 916:14:56, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 876:01:03, 2 September 2005 (UTC) 855:13:30, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 846:05:25, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 833:05:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 824:04:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 799:04:41, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 782:04:13, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 772:03:26, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 761:02:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 731:01:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 713:01:14, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 579:02:10, 1 September 2005 (UTC) 397:and see a list of open tasks. 292:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1411:Mid-importance Iraq articles 1335:18:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 828:Plain langauge is nice too. 614:18:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC) 304:Disaster management articles 1377:14:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 934:02:27:29, 2005-09-01 (UTC) 905:Category:Man-made disasters 890:23:20, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 700:23:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 683:22:47, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 654:21:06, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 560:22:18, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 551:21:02, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 542:20:57, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 522:18:29, 31 August 2005 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1437: 1264:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 1239:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 968:September 11, 2001 attacks 429:project's importance scale 403:Knowledge:WikiProject Iraq 324:project's importance scale 1416:WikiProject Iraq articles 1406:Start-Class Iraq articles 422: 406:Template:WikiProject Iraq 355: 317: 266: 245: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1185:Why is this not relevant 627:reported at The Guardian 1235:External links modified 1066:International responses 970:. Still a huge number — 901:Heysel Stadium disaster 786:Given that Knowledge's 457:It is requested that a 453: 227:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 897:Hillsborough disaster 662:not terrorists. The 625:The mortar attack is 452: 100:Neutral point of view 1289:to let others know. 1250:. If necessary, add 1060:International Effect 903:, loads of stuff in 792:terrorism discussion 706:"double-plus ungood" 527:The Guardian article 480:and other web sites. 105:No original research 1285:parameter below to 474:WordPress Openverse 467:improve its quality 465:in this article to 295:Disaster management 286:Disaster management 258:Disaster management 1214:stochastic process 746:User:Klonimus/AINB 674:of individuals in 515:Cite your sources. 508:User:195.70.32.136 472:The external tool 454: 233:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1366: 1365: 1333: 995: 987: 979: 909:Hurricane Katrina 839:yellow journalism 494: 493: 481: 443: 442: 439: 438: 435: 434: 334: 333: 330: 329: 213: 212: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1428: 1351: 1350: 1344: 1329: 1328:Talk to my owner 1324: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1265: 1257: 1191:invasion of 2003 1160: 1155: 989: 983: 975: 950: 945: 490: 488: 471: 451: 445: 411: 410: 407: 404: 401: 386:WikiProject Iraq 380: 375: 374: 373: 364: 357: 356: 351: 343: 336: 306: 305: 302: 299: 296: 275: 268: 267: 262: 254: 247: 230: 224: 223: 215: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1381: 1380: 1348: 1342: 1332: 1327: 1297: 1293: 1259: 1251: 1237: 1187: 1168: 1166:Choice of words 1158: 1153: 1149: 1062: 1039: 1012: 1001:Ta bu shi da yu 948: 943: 887:Ta bu shi da yu 883: 622: 499: 486: 484: 449: 408: 405: 402: 399: 398: 376: 371: 369: 349: 303: 300: 297: 294: 293: 260: 231:on Knowledge's 228: 207:August 31, 2008 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1434: 1432: 1424: 1423: 1418: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1383: 1382: 1364: 1363: 1352: 1341: 1338: 1325: 1319: 1318: 1311: 1279: 1278: 1270:Added archive 1236: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1186: 1183: 1167: 1164: 1148: 1145: 1084: 1083: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1043:69.177.244.239 1038: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1006: 997: 956: 955: 954: 953: 923:69.177.244.239 919: 918: 882: 879: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804:that for them. 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 733: 702: 641:uses the term 621: 618: 617: 616: 584: 582: 581: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 524: 498: 495: 492: 491: 482: 470: 455: 441: 440: 437: 436: 433: 432: 425:Mid-importance 421: 415: 414: 412: 395:the discussion 382: 381: 365: 353: 352: 350:Mid‑importance 344: 332: 331: 328: 327: 320:Low-importance 316: 310: 309: 307: 290:the discussion 276: 264: 263: 261:Low‑importance 255: 243: 242: 236: 225: 211: 210: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1433: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1389: 1388: 1386: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1361: 1360:MediaWiki.org 1357: 1353: 1346: 1345: 1339: 1337: 1336: 1330: 1323: 1316: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1290: 1288: 1284: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1255: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1234: 1227: 1224: 1219: 1215: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1192: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1173: 1165: 1163: 1161: 1156: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1134: 1132: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1059: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1036: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1017: 1010:Random Jabber 1009: 1005: 1002: 998: 993: 988: 986: 982: 978: 974: 969: 965: 964: 963: 961: 951: 946: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 933: 928: 927: 924: 917: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 893: 892: 891: 888: 881:Encyclopedic? 880: 878: 877: 874: 856: 853: 849: 848: 847: 844: 840: 836: 835: 834: 831: 827: 826: 825: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 802: 801: 800: 797: 793: 789: 785: 784: 783: 780: 775: 774: 773: 770: 765: 764: 763: 762: 759: 747: 742: 738: 737:plain english 734: 732: 729: 725: 721: 716: 715: 714: 711: 707: 703: 701: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 658:It should be 657: 656: 655: 652: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 623: 620:Mortar Attack 619: 615: 611: 607: 604: 601: 597: 596:217.42.61.192 593: 592: 591: 589: 580: 577: 573: 569: 568: 561: 558: 554: 553: 552: 549: 545: 544: 543: 540: 536: 532: 528: 525: 523: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 509: 504: 503: 496: 489: 483: 479: 475: 468: 464: 460: 456: 447: 446: 430: 426: 420: 417: 416: 413: 409:Iraq articles 396: 392: 388: 387: 379: 368: 366: 363: 359: 358: 354: 348: 345: 342: 338: 325: 321: 315: 312: 311: 308: 291: 287: 283: 282: 277: 274: 270: 269: 265: 259: 256: 253: 249: 244: 240: 234: 226: 222: 217: 216: 208: 204: 203: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1367: 1320: 1300: 1291: 1286: 1282: 1280: 1241: 1238: 1203:Irishpunktom 1195:Irishpunktom 1188: 1171: 1169: 1150: 1142: 1135: 1128: 1119: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1095: 1085: 1065: 1063: 1040: 1023: 1013: 984: 980: 976: 972: 957: 929: 920: 884: 869: 852:Glowimperial 769:Glowimperial 756: 723: 719: 697:Glowimperial 680:Glowimperial 642: 634: 610:Irishpunktom 602: 587: 583: 534: 530: 505: 500: 458: 424: 384: 319: 279: 239:WikiProjects 200: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1356:Phabricator 1218:catastrophe 529:reports 30 378:Iraq portal 229:Start-class 205:section on 202:On this day 148:free images 31:not a forum 1385:Categories 1340:Page views 1147:Death Toll 693:insurgents 689:terrorists 668:kidnapping 660:insurgents 647:insurgents 639:Al Jazeera 635:terrorists 631:Al Jazeera 513:Citation? 459:photograph 1315:this tool 1308:this tool 1113:Trilobite 960:Saforrest 913:Trilobite 843:Aquillion 821:Aquillion 794:page. -- 788:terrorism 720:Terrorism 672:beheading 588:Untergang 197:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1369:Leo1pard 1321:Cheers.— 1254:cbignore 1139:jcomp489 1078:Done. -- 1051:Done. -- 1016:Cyberman 830:Klonimus 758:Klonimus 606:contribs 557:CanSpice 548:ceejayoz 463:included 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1358:and on 1331::Online 1283:checked 1248:my edit 1131:ThomasK 1098:ThomasK 1080:ThomasK 1053:ThomasK 572:Reuters 519:Fighter 427:on the 322:on the 199:in the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1262:nobots 1172:result 1154:Acetic 1024:attack 944:Acetic 664:mortar 643:rebels 535:meters 533:, not 497:Bridge 487:Upload 478:Flickr 235:scale. 126:Google 1223:Myron 1089:Myron 1070:Tyagi 1028:Tyagi 1026:. -- 985:OCKER 977:ESSED 932:Peyna 873:Myron 796:Tyagi 779:M4-10 739:(The 728:Tyagi 710:M4-10 708:? -- 651:Tyagi 649:. -- 576:Tyagi 539:Tyagi 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1373:talk 1287:true 1177:Zero 992:talk 676:Iraq 670:and 608:) -- 600:talk 531:feet 400:Iraq 391:Iraq 347:Iraq 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1274:to 1122:GdB 741:BBC 691:or 537:-- 469:. 461:be 419:Mid 314:Low 176:TWL 1387:: 1375:) 1260:{{ 1256:}} 1252:{{ 1205:\ 1175:-- 899:, 678:. 612:\ 517:-- 156:) 54:; 1371:( 1362:. 1317:. 1310:. 1298:Y 1159:' 994:) 990:( 981:R 973:M 949:' 603:· 598:( 431:. 326:. 241:: 209:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
2005 Al-Aimmah Bridge disaster
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Main Page
On this day
August 31, 2008

content assessment
WikiProjects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑