Knowledge

Talk:2013–14 Eredivisie

Source πŸ“

184: 230: 212: 160: 240: 22: 84: 53: 94: 698:
On a different note: I realize there is a coding difference. I create the row-highlighting in the Eredivisie template based on the \p subtemplate, whereas the team codes are used in the PL template. Was this chosen in advance (for whatever reason), or did user experience indicate that using the team
717:
The team codes are used because it makes updating much easier when teams change the position. For the PL template the editor switches the rows of the teams and updates p,w,d,l..-parameters and thats it. In Eredivisie template the editor must also change the number in the ifeq-statement (for example
505:
Yes, 2 before and 2 after. Great! About the colors from what I know it has always been green for main competition, blur for next and red for relegation. "Dark" color for main tournament and brighter for playoff/qualification. I dont know any consensus for the exakt hex-numbers though but I guess it
695:
I think both set-ups would work equally well for people editing the standings. The logical line-breaking comes into play when someone wants to create a similar template themselves, then it is easier to figure out what is happening and change it for an other use. I have not create many categories,
486:
I now have some time going through the old discussion and I will update the template to show at least 5 teams. I think it is otherwise visually the same as the English templates. One question I have though is with the highlighting colours for various competitions: Is there a list somewhere what
580:
Yes, I intent to keep colours consistent. Although it is a question what to do with older seasons when there where 3 European tournaments. The no-wrap command avoids line breaks. In particular to be able to have each position on its own line (instead of having closing and opening brackets for
432:
Ohh and by the way in the discussions we had in village pump we said to always show five teams for all parts of the table while this table sometimes show three or four? Should we make it five here to? I think it will be better if it is the same everywhere.
338:
Yes I think this is a good idea to do for every league as the league tables are used across several pages at once, So instead of doing everything manual we just edit in 1 place for all pages the template is on. I agree with this.
304:
In line with some other league season articles it might be good to switch the table into a template format, so partial tables on club season pages do not have to be updated manually. I created this template at
861: 174: 856: 866: 193: 67: 169: 63: 655: 876: 871: 799:
article, should it appear in both places? If not, it might be more appropriate solely in the Eerste Divisie article, because it's mostly a promotion play-off.
599:
Okay I guess that is a matter of opinion, to me it is easier for unexperienced editors to just change the rows in the PL table but this probably works too.
891: 886: 851: 150: 140: 545:
What is the purpose of the third row below the teams? The one with nowrap? That is the only difference between this template and the english ones?
659:
that you added to this template. Perhaps a subcategory called "League table templates" or something where we can list all league table templates.
718:
Hereenveen gets to 4th place the editor must change {{Ere1314|5}} to {{Ere1314|4}} (in the PL version it would have been the team code on both).
881: 846: 266: 581:
different table position on the same line). The code is therefore clearer to read (in my opinion) because each table position is separate.
696:
what I find is easiest is just adding the category to one page, then clicking the red-link and then press create or whatever it is called.
116: 262: 253: 217: 316: 319:
for examples of use. How do you guys feel about using this template, so updates are incorporated across Knowledge in one go.
107: 58: 391: 33: 309: 99: 796: 468:
I take 5 as 2 before and 2 after. But I'll leave it up to some of the others to give their opinions about it too.
753:
I changed that to have the same type of edits needed across Knowledge. Good point, hopefully it will work well!
21: 344: 781: 39: 112: 115:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
825: 806: 760: 706: 588: 494: 475: 376: 360: 326: 245: 397:? Something that should be fixed in any of them to make them look the same to simplify updates? 340: 736: 677: 617: 563: 528: 451: 415: 653:
By the way do you know how to make new cathegories? I was thinking to add a subcategory to
507: 183: 229: 211: 159: 831: 812: 785: 766: 748: 712: 689: 629: 594: 575: 540: 500: 481: 463: 427: 382: 364: 348: 332: 840: 820: 801: 777: 755: 701: 583: 489: 470: 371: 356: 321: 818:
Another alternative is to create it as a template that will occur on both pages.
720: 661: 601: 547: 512: 435: 399: 258: 235: 89: 93: 83: 52: 369:
Very well, I will include the template in the various articles then.
257:, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the 355:
Yes, I agree with the above statement, will be easier to edit. -
15: 387:
Sounds good! Is it any difference between this template and
182: 158: 261:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, visit the
265:
where you can join the project or contribute to the
111:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 862:
Low-importance football in the Netherlands articles
857:Start-Class football in the Netherlands articles 867:Football in the Netherlands task force articles 656:Category:Association football league templates 8: 317:Template:2013–14 Eredivisie table/testcases 19: 206: 47: 251:This article falls within the scope of 208: 49: 821: 802: 756: 702: 584: 490: 471: 372: 322: 7: 877:WikiProject Football season articles 872:Start-Class football season articles 776:Ajax could have been Dutch champion 105:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 506:should be the same on all tables. 14: 892:All WikiProject Netherlands pages 275:Knowledge:WikiProject Netherlands 887:Start-Class Netherlands articles 852:Low-importance football articles 795:This section also occurs in the 278:Template:WikiProject Netherlands 238: 228: 210: 92: 82: 51: 20: 145:This article has been rated as 125:Knowledge:WikiProject Football 1: 882:WikiProject Football articles 847:Start-Class football articles 786:19:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC) 194:the season article task force 191:This article is supported by 170:the Dutch football task force 167:This article is supported by 128:Template:WikiProject Football 119:and see a list of open tasks. 767:17:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 749:01:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 713:00:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 690:23:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 630:23:49, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 595:23:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 576:22:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 541:22:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 501:19:32, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 487:colour is recommended when? 482:14:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 464:14:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 428:14:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 392:2013–14 Premier League table 383:14:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 365:15:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 349:14:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 333:14:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 100:Association football portal 908: 151:project's importance scale 510:mighht be worth reading. 223: 190: 166: 144: 77: 46: 310:2013–14 Eredivisie table 832:21:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC) 813:14:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC) 254:WikiProject Netherlands 797:2013–14 Eerste Divisie 699:code was more useful? 187: 163: 28:This article is rated 186: 162: 791:Eredivisie play-offs 281:Netherlands articles 113:Association football 108:WikiProject Football 246:Netherlands portal 188: 164: 34:content assessment 658: 297: 296: 293: 292: 289: 288: 205: 204: 201: 200: 131:football articles 899: 830: 823: 811: 804: 765: 758: 747: 745: 734: 727: 711: 704: 688: 686: 675: 668: 654: 628: 626: 615: 608: 593: 586: 574: 572: 561: 554: 539: 537: 526: 519: 499: 492: 480: 473: 462: 460: 449: 442: 426: 424: 413: 406: 396: 390: 381: 374: 331: 324: 314: 308: 283: 282: 279: 276: 273: 248: 243: 242: 241: 232: 225: 224: 214: 207: 133: 132: 129: 126: 123: 102: 97: 96: 86: 79: 78: 73: 70: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 907: 906: 902: 901: 900: 898: 897: 896: 837: 836: 819: 800: 793: 754: 737: 728: 721: 719: 700: 678: 669: 662: 660: 618: 609: 602: 600: 582: 564: 555: 548: 546: 529: 520: 513: 511: 488: 469: 452: 443: 436: 434: 416: 407: 400: 398: 394: 388: 370: 320: 312: 306: 302: 280: 277: 274: 271: 270: 244: 239: 237: 130: 127: 124: 121: 120: 98: 91: 71: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 905: 903: 895: 894: 889: 884: 879: 874: 869: 864: 859: 854: 849: 839: 838: 835: 834: 792: 789: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 697: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 352: 351: 301: 298: 295: 294: 291: 290: 287: 286: 284: 250: 249: 233: 221: 220: 215: 203: 202: 199: 198: 189: 179: 178: 175:Low-importance 165: 155: 154: 147:Low-importance 143: 137: 136: 134: 117:the discussion 104: 103: 87: 75: 74: 72:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 904: 893: 890: 888: 885: 883: 880: 878: 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 844: 842: 833: 829: 828: 824: 817: 816: 815: 814: 810: 809: 805: 798: 790: 788: 787: 783: 779: 768: 764: 763: 759: 752: 751: 750: 746: 743: 742: 735: 733: 732: 726: 725: 716: 715: 714: 710: 709: 705: 694: 693: 692: 691: 687: 684: 683: 676: 674: 673: 667: 666: 657: 631: 627: 624: 623: 616: 614: 613: 607: 606: 598: 597: 596: 592: 591: 587: 579: 578: 577: 573: 570: 569: 562: 560: 559: 553: 552: 544: 543: 542: 538: 535: 534: 527: 525: 524: 518: 517: 509: 504: 503: 502: 498: 497: 493: 485: 484: 483: 479: 478: 474: 467: 466: 465: 461: 458: 457: 450: 448: 447: 441: 440: 431: 430: 429: 425: 422: 421: 414: 412: 411: 405: 404: 393: 386: 385: 384: 380: 379: 375: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 354: 353: 350: 346: 342: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 329: 325: 318: 311: 299: 285: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 247: 236: 234: 231: 227: 226: 222: 219: 216: 213: 209: 196: 195: 185: 181: 180: 176: 173:(assessed as 172: 171: 161: 157: 156: 152: 148: 142: 139: 138: 135: 118: 114: 110: 109: 101: 95: 90: 88: 85: 81: 80: 76: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 826: 807: 794: 775: 761: 740: 739: 730: 729: 723: 722: 707: 681: 680: 671: 670: 664: 663: 652: 621: 620: 611: 610: 604: 603: 589: 567: 566: 557: 556: 550: 549: 532: 531: 522: 521: 515: 514: 495: 476: 455: 454: 445: 444: 438: 437: 419: 418: 409: 408: 402: 401: 377: 341:Skyblueshaun 327: 303: 300:League table 263:project page 252: 192: 168: 146: 106: 40:WikiProjects 272:Netherlands 259:Netherlands 218:Netherlands 64:Netherlands 30:Start-class 841:Categories 267:discussion 822:CRwikiCA 803:CRwikiCA 778:Siiiiimz 757:CRwikiCA 703:CRwikiCA 585:CRwikiCA 508:WP:Color 491:CRwikiCA 472:CRwikiCA 373:CRwikiCA 357:Rafara13 323:CRwikiCA 122:Football 59:Football 149:on the 315:, see 68:Season 36:scale. 827:talk 808:talk 782:talk 762:talk 741:talk 708:talk 682:talk 622:talk 590:talk 568:talk 533:talk 496:talk 477:talk 456:talk 420:talk 378:talk 361:talk 345:talk 328:talk 731:237 724:QED 672:237 665:QED 612:237 605:QED 558:237 551:QED 523:237 516:QED 446:237 439:QED 410:237 403:QED 141:Low 843:: 784:) 395:}} 389:{{ 363:) 347:) 339:-- 313:}} 307:{{ 177:). 66:/ 62:: 780:( 744:) 738:( 685:) 679:( 625:) 619:( 571:) 565:( 536:) 530:( 459:) 453:( 423:) 417:( 359:( 343:( 269:. 197:. 153:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Football
Netherlands
Season
WikiProject icon
icon
Association football portal
WikiProject Football
Association football
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Dutch football task force
Low-importance
Taskforce icon
the season article task force
WikiProject icon
Netherlands
WikiProject icon
Netherlands portal
WikiProject Netherlands
Netherlands
project page
discussion
2013–14 Eredivisie table
Template:2013–14 Eredivisie table/testcases

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑