Talk:Collective punishment

891:

might be, termination points for smugglers' tunnels. They've demolished homes in West Bank and Gaza on the basis that their military forces have received fire from those homes, although firing on soldiers engaged in military operations is by definition not terrorism. Attempting to limit the discussion to homes of terrorists masks broader issues. In fact, the version I created is STILL somewhat POV towards Israel, because many house demolitions are conducted with NO officially stated reasons at all; just an administrative order by military authorities, and a gunpoint 30-minute-warning in the dead of night.

779:"Knowledge should be a collection of facts proven to be true, not a collection of claims not proven false." I have no idea what you mean here. You had presented some "examples" where something was supposedly collective punishment but was also proportional. Unfortunately, they are fatally flawed. I suggested that you might possibly rethink them. It looks like you don't want to. That's OK. I have no intention of moving in on your turf. I simply added what I know about collective punishment and the Geneva Conventions (mainly the 4th), but I have no agenda to push, so I'll move on. Cheers. 2027:

Abdulrahman al-Awlaki as a bystander who was "in the wrong place at the wrong time," stating that "the U.S. government did not know that Mr. Awlaki’s son was there" before the airstrike was ordered. Former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs commented on the airstrike: "Maybe he (Abdulrahman Anwar al-Awlaki) should've had a more responsible father." To say that it was collective punishment fails to use sources wisely, and shows perhaps your nationalist interest.

685:

achieving a military objective," or "cost fewer lives." Instead it reserves rights to noncombatants (in the real sense, not the way the US currently uses the term). If someone from my city kills a general, it is "reasonable" to expect some inconveniences, such as short detentions or curfews, etc. If we are beaten while being arrested, mostly likely noone would raise a fuss. If the army cuts off the water, electricity, gas, sewage,

806:

historical files. In 1914 authorities on the laws of war as they were formulated then said that collective punishment was the only recourse when, say, a partisan sniper shoots a sentry in an occupied country, since the occupiers were unlikely to catch the shooter who will be concealed by the populace, even if the saw him do it. Some said the problem was when you burn the village as a reprisal, you just create 100 more shooters.

218: 197: 1572:

be bigger than or equal to that of a hole century (Let alone a section about a conflict that deals with one side of it). It is unproportional, unprofessional, and by doing so you are being sympathetic to a certain state and its history, making the Article Opinionated, political and journalistic, not informative as encyclopedia should be. I recommend all state's examples should be removed until edited on an equal basis.--

228: 319: 21: 298: 569: 1290:

presented above is sourced to the Anti Defamation League, the Jerusalem Post, and the Israeli Defense Force, all of which clearly can be expected fo have a biased point of view. The material cited to Human Rights Watch should stay and should be counted as an independent and reliable source. Ditto any references which might be found from such sources as the UN, the Red Cross, or Amnesty International.

454: 398: 1263:) (bolded section you removed): why did you remove this? It would appear to have relevance so long as the Israel section is present, and there probably is room in the article for a general section (NOT mentioning specific countries) on whether "collective punishment" is negated by one party's use of civilian neighborhoods or persons in an attempt to protect military assets. 166: 526: 515: 504: 493: 482: 412: 387: 952:"X use the term to refer to Y," is more descriptive, because it implies verbatim use of the term, as well as its use as a code/power word. "X describe Y as collective punishment" would also work, though it would soften the tone a bit; whether this makes it more or less POV is a matter of opinion and can be taken on a case-by-case basis. 1373:- There is an unfortunate tendency on Knowledge for users trying to push one POV or the other in regards to Israel/Palestine, to try to make a battleground out of every article which can in some minor tangential way to be said to be "related" to the conflict. I believe it is in the best interests of Knowledge's growth to 1646:. Wouldnt it be better just to link the individual articles on the topics to this page so that people might make up their own minds? The article seems to give an excessively brief treatment of the topic at hand but has a very long list of examples. I dont know enough about the topic personally but Im sure someone does. 1224:- The IHT source only says "Palestinians charge the hobbling of their movement... is collective punishment." In the Haaretz article, the only mention of "collective punishment" is by someone posting in the commenters section, not in the article itself. Neither of these sources appears to meet the stringent 1418:

Woah, woah, woahoah. Even a cursory glance at the sources will show that Israel/Palestine is by far the most frequently discussed case of alleged collective punishment - and that the sources are "tilted against Israel" in the same manner that this article is "tilted against Israel." Sometimes neutral

1069:

As it stands today I believe that at least a part of the article has been commandeered by people seeking to use it to push an anti-Israel point of view. I have tried as best I can to ensure that both sides of the argument (whether Israel's actions are or are not collective punishment) are represented

890:

The Israeli house demolitions are NOT limited to terrorists; in fact, the policy of destroying bombers' homes is probably a propaganda device to obscure a much more widespread and ongoing policy of punitive demolitions. In particular, Israel has demolished homes in Gaza on the basis that they are, or

2325:

The sources Nishidani provided is mintpressnews, which is not a RS, and an opinion piece from the Atlantic, again not a RS. The article itself, quotes senior US officials who say that it wasn't a targeted killing. It's not clear why we need an RFC when the sources clearly don't agree with Nishidani.

1571:

The headline of this article is of a very general subject. Since most of the Article's contents are about The history of Collective Punishment, it should be general. The capacity and nature of information about a state's Collective Punishment should be equal to another, and a single state's one cant

709:

Hmmm.... I'm not sure what the above contribution has to do with whether or not collective punishment is never proportional. It does state that collective punishment is consistent with rule of law, but that argues for a change to the text, not the topic I had brought up. I am using the concept of

684:

Your examples of proportional actions are flawed. What I understand you to say is that anything goes so long as it achieves some military goal. Most likely, you don't understand the concept as used in, for example, the Geneva Conventions. This concept has nothing to do with "most effective way of

1617:

I believe there is no way to measure this, but you must accept that an overwhelming majority of RS and international organisations refer to the Israel's actions as collective punishment. If you can find other examples of collective punishment supported by multiple RS, you are welcome to add them in

1311:

The Red Cross has been very biased in creating the Red Crescent subshoot, while not allowing Israel's emergency medical personnel (the Magen David Adom) to join for 57 years (they first applied in 1949 and were only allowed to join in 2006). There have also been numerous documented incidents of Red

961:

If it's more than just terrorism, say, "homes suspected of being used in military and terrorist actions against Israel." And if some homes are being demolished without any stated reason, cite an instance in which a home is demolished and no stated reason was offered, and say that's what happened.

840:

There is nothing "uncheckable" about news stories in the New York Times. Historical newspapers going back to the 1850's are available on microfilm in many public libraries and college libraries throughout the world. Most public libraries will provide these through interlibrary loan if they do not

672:

Actions have to satisfy several criteria in order not to be considered collective punishment. It is possible to fit the rule of law and still be collective punishment. If you want to make the argument that the "rule of law" in war is the Geneva Conventions and that covers proportionality, then at

2122:

Two U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity stated that the target of the October 14, 2011 airstrike was Ibrahim al-Banna, an Egyptian believed to be a senior operative in Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Another U.S. administration official speaking on condition of anonymity described

2026:

805:

It is interesting that there was a time when Britain or Germany or the US freely used the term "collective punishment" instead of doing it and pretending it is something else. I added some examples of official collective punishment. Certainly there are more, but these I found in the New York Times

1689:

It would seem this is a popular social control method, especially in Europe, from medieval times up to recent times. Which is to say in use under (state) law. Since when has it become against international law, eg. crime against humanity, violation of laws of war, etc.? Can citations be found for

1665:

This article is too heavily focused the citation of large scale historical example of the phenomenon. There an absence of the role of collective punishment generally within cultural contexts. The use of collective punishment within, for example, eduction systems may seem trivial when compared the

1315:

The underlying problem with this is that even while an organization's leadership may make a claim to be unbiased, the information that they are getting from the Israel/Palestine area cannot hope to be unbiased. They are as vulnerable as anyone else to emotional attachments, "fudged" reports, and

1307:

I am not so sure I can agree with you. The UN faces a large amount of condemnation, particularly for putting human rights abusers on its human rights councils and for the lopsided voting structure. This is especially true since "special sessions" have been held numerous times to make some pretty

1163:

on the edits or here in this discussion. As I look at your mass reversion, there are things unrelated to Israel/Palestine but relevant to the article that you remove, and since you remove at least 500 bytes of information (net amount), your claim of "mass removal of sourced information" and your

903:

If the "citation needed" tag is meant to apply to the "policy of systematic destruction" part, then this is more sensible. Widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure is an indisputable fact which I can cite; the "systematic" nature, and whether it is a "policy", may be open to dispute but

761:

a form of collective punishment. Again, if you feel that there are claims made in the article that are flat-out wrong, fix them. And the crimes of the Japanese government by 1942 were far greater than action taken by the U.S. against Americans of Japanese descent. Yes, Japanese-Americans were

1093:. Labeling groups like HRW and Amnesty as "pro-Palestinian activists" is totally inappropriate. On every other subject, they are taken as reasonably evenhanded and neutral observers - I noticed you added HRW reports on China, for example, without attributing them to "pro-Tibetan activists." < 629:

while maintaining that pro-US people consider it an anti-American code word, the latter being a far more questionable statemtent. Any critical mind looking at the article would see the tenor of language and realize that it is not reliable as is. I'll try to rework the language to make it more

2002:

Sippenhaft, which is the German word for kinship liability (another name for the same thing). Go any check through the sources. If you eliminate everything here that fails your criteria as stated above, I'll take you as editing in bona fide. If not then you are defending a nationalist interest.

872:

Clearly both have talked of collective punishment, but it's more notable and important that human rights groups have. One would expect Palestinian supporters to criticize Israel regardless, so it doesn't mean much. The fact that human rights groups have said the same thing is more informative.

756:

Knowledge should be a collection of facts proven to be true, not a collection of claims not proven false. If you believe collective punishment always violates proportionality but do not provide any argument for this claim, I can't convince you otherwise. Regarding family punishment not being

1289:

Inevitably, groups associated with one of the sides in a bitter conflict will see neutral and widely respected groups as "biased" against their side. It just too obvious a ploy to label any neutral evaluation as "biased" so it can be discounted or removed. The criticism of Human Rights Watch

1008:

Here's an idea; come up with sources, and then we'll work from what the sources say. As it is, the vast majority of what you changed was unsourced. And you're quite right, we don't even know if Palestinians have made those allegations. Finally, you left out some of the changes you proposed.

80:

If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is

2001:

If you believe that you should proceed to gut the article. From top to bottom most of the sources added by numerous editors lack the words "collective punishment".You say the sources don't even 'address the topic by any other name'. This is diametrically opposed to your weird arguments at

1024:

I am thinking that stopping direct trade, no sporting or other cultural links, which results in far worse conditions in the north, because of the actons of the various other powers (Republic of Cyprus/Greece/Turkey) is an act of collective punishment. Should it be included in the article?

736:

examples of collective punishment that don't contradict proportionality? The two examples you presented don't work. The first is not an example of collective punishment. The second certainly violates proportionality (punishment of the Japanese were out of proportion to their "crimes").

667:

My thought is that you're a stupid fucking shithead and hide your neoliberal agenda behind a veneer of "neutrality." Any discussion of gaza that doesn't discuss israel's many warcrimes and its unquestionable use of collective punishment is by definition not neutral and not reliable.

603:

This article should be called something like 'Acts of collective punishment throughout history'. It contains no relevant information about rights or laws that protect against collective punishment in the modern word, nor any of the various definitions for the term under the law.

971:

Which quotes were rephrased? They should be stated verbatim in order to help avoid POV. And clearly Geneva Conventions need not be cited if described, although a reference tag always helps avoid confusion. For example, some people might not know the difference between the

1601:

The example being 'The most discussed of our time' is not a fact, but an opinion which you share. The fact that it is the most discussed in the Media doesnt and shouldnt serve as a basis for writing and editing informative (Encylopedic) Articles. Reasons: my previous post.

1116:

WTF? "reasonable and evenhanded" - this the same HRW and AI I know of, who regularly bitch and moan in countries that have free speech but barely raise a whisper about countries like China and Iran and Saudi Arabia who beat people up just for showing a cross necklace?

881:

Both mean essentially the same thing, but the second is more readable. If "described" is viewed as too sympathetic, "criticized" or "condemned" would be acceptable. Using tangled language on behalf of Israel's critics might have the effect of downplaying their claims.

1430:

off base to eliminate any mention. With respect, I don't subscribe to "containing the damage" of internal Knowledge conflicts by introducing arbitrary limits on article content. Not only will that not work for Knowledge, it's an abdication responsibility to our

1144:

Therefore, it may be reasonable to question whether, while they are reasonable and reliable sources for the most part, their analysis and pronouncements in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict are skewed and not reliable for the purposes of the section in question.

939:"). If you want to give an example of a human rights organization condemning an action, cite an action and give the name of the specific organization. Your phrasing for this is particularly poor, since the nebulous "human rights groups" violates the spirit of 624:

Sus scrofa: Please stop inserting unbalanced anti-Israel POV. "Unambigious" and "clear cut" are unambigious and clear cut indications of an anti-Israel POV, as is eliminating any indication that pro-Israel people consider "collective punishment" an anti-Israel

1312:

Cross vehicles being used as transportation vehicles by the Palestinian side as well as propaganda tools. Amnesty International seems highly anti-Western in general - as evidenced by its failure to condemn the mockery that was the 2001 UN conference in Durban.

656:

was proportional, as it led to the deaths of fewer people, led to the injuries of fewer people, and affected fewer people than Japanese attacks on American interests. Yet it too is often considered collective punishment, and for good reason. Thoughts?

108:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not

899:

The particular interpretation and application of the conventions is open to dispute, but not the wording itself. "Citation needed" is insult to injury. The article reads as if we don't know whether or not the Palestinians even made these allegations!

1164:

dispute over whether the human rights organizations are "pro-palestinian" (see above as I play devil's advocate) indicate you have some issues. The presence of a userbox on your page in support of hezbollah also makes one worry that you have a

1481:

and indicate that the various sources you mention are themselves biased in this instance. Regardless, this is yet another reason to try to keep such a conflict off of this page and in the sector of Israel/Palestine articles where it belongs.

689:. to the entire city permanantly, or doesn't lift the curfew periodically to allow for citizens to get supplies, then there is probably a problem with proportionality. Whether or not that is a good tactic to get the assassin is irrelevant. 930:

a list of specific organizations. Anyone can declare himself a supporter of Palestinians or a champion of human rights. Say what the person or organization indisputably is, either by action (e.g., "critic") or name (e.g., "groups such as

1239:", especially as Palestinian groups normally target civilian buildings or transportation (such as public busing, restaurants, and nightclubs where population density increases the number of civilian deaths) rather than military assets." 2272:

support this claim. There is no indication here that a family member was deliberately targeted, and no indication here of indiscriminate group-targeting. The critical point is targeting intent. A police officer isn't a villain if he

1065:

There are many more modern instances of Collective Punishment in the world than Israel/Palestine. I believe that the article needs more of these for the sake of balance. I have endeavored to add a few today. Please help with this.

2663: 991:— claiming NPOV where that was highly, highly debatable, and inserting your own POV. It's rather unfair to cry foul when someone else alters/reverts your changes without discussion after you alter/revert mine without discussion. 1361:

I believe that the presence of the Israel/Palestine section in this article is a detriment to the article, getting in the way of making the article better since so many edits pass through its lens. I will list a few points:

1370:. The "Israel and the Middle East" section is nearly 1/4 of the article's length, and is (at the moment) at least somewhat tilted against Israel. There are edit wars in the article's past, mostly surrounding this section. 842: 863:

My recent edits, which were consistently edit-summarized, have been reverted solely on the grounds that "actually is more NPOV". Perhaps I have not explained myself thoroughly enough. I will do so phrase-by-phrase.

1139:. There's also the fact that the UN human rights councils all spend an inordinate amount of time on making anti-Israel pronouncements and their memberships are very stacked with nations that are hostile to Israel. 823:

None of the actions of the English in these places resulted in the huge backlash from the population that the actions of other powers have frequently done (eg post-1967 Palestine, Vietnam, Iraq, Chechnya etc).

2556:

I have added the ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement template as parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict. It is obvious which parts. This means that editors who want to edit that content must be

1669:

Also there is no acknowledgment on the on the removal of civil liberties by governments in order to combat perceived threats. This form of collective punishment is probably the most historically significant.

647:

article. For example, taking hostage a family member of a terrorist might be the most effective way of achieving a military objective, but it is often considered collective punishment. Even in the sense of

996:

In any event, it's important to keep NPOV on this, since, not only are Israel-Arab conflicts some of the most intensely debated conflicts of our time, there are drastic POV issues in most media sources.

714:

as linked from the prior version of the article, and this has no reference to the Geneva Conventions. This may be flawed, but if so it should be fixed. I understand the point that collective punishment

2198:, it's also what USAF calls 'Collateral damage', better known to mere mortals as a 'fuck up'. .... BTW What is the logic (or source) for the killing of the Russian Royals being 'Collective punishment'? 673:

least you have an argument. Otherwise, proportionality is a main criteria for collective punishment. What about Hussein's killing citizens in Dujail after an assassination attempt? As a dictator, he

1833: 962:"Resistance" and "smuggling" are fairly nebulous words compared to more descriptive phrases like "military actions," "offensive military actions," "defensive military actions," and "weapons smuggling." 2123:

1497:

I agree with M1rth, the accusations against Israel can be in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict article, if they aren't already. A brief pointer to that article can then be placed in this page.

907:

In conclusion, I would appreciate at least SOME attempt to document and discuss edits, rather than giving the appearance of "reflex" reversion of all edits which might be seen to impugn Israel.

1587:

WTF? The most discussed example of collective punishment of our time isn't worth mentioning in this article? This is a good example of why Knowledge is almost totally worthless in this area.

827:

Either the English were as so nasty that the technique worked (as it did for the Nazis) or else what they were doing was considered proportionate and "fair" to other civilians in the region.

820:

Someone has made repeated use of uncheckable clips from the New York Times as proof that the English used communal punishment in places like 1920s Palestine, Malaya, Kenya, Cyprus etc.

1331:

The other problem is that while many of these groups are "international", Israel is one nation surrounded by a large number of hostile nations, and thus we have a severe problem if we

1535:

From RfC: I agree that a separate section and several paragraphs puts way too much weight on the one conflict. A few sentences and a link to the appropriate article would be better.

886:"the Israeli policy of destroying the homes of alleged terrorists" to "the demolition of houses which the Israelis claim are related to terrorism, resistance, or smuggling activities" 2509:

Supporter clubs are often collectively punished for the actions of single individuals, in an effort to get the clubs to self-police their members. Examples are numerous. For example

1475:

Sometimes neutral treatment of facts reflects very poorly on one side or another, because the facts themselves are not "neutral" in the sense of 1:1 correspondence between two sides.

1638:

The article seems to be an aspect of the Geneva Conventions. Using it to label conflicts that occurred before they were in place seems excessively revisionist and in violation of

1222:"Israel's extensive system of internal roadblocks and checkpoints in Palestinian land has been condemned as a form of economic collective punishment. (with two sources appended)" 1443: 117:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.

1268:

It would probably go a long way towards civility in this article if you would explain these edits. I have no doubt that you probably do not mind some of them but in a fit of

467: 424: 1834:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130703013842/http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Syria+army+bulldozes+houses+Sunni+Muslim+areas+collective+punishment/7187238/story.html

895:

Rephrasing quotes from the Geneva Conventions as claims and counter-claims, made by anonymous "Palestinians" and nebulous "others", with additional "cite needed" tag.

1754:

Do international sanctions (e.g. the west's current sanctions on Iran over its nuclear enrichment) constitute collective punishment? Some have argued that it does.

1419:

treatment of facts reflects very poorly on one side or another, because the facts themselves are not "neutral" in the sense of 1:1 correspondence between two sides.

2412: 2408: 2394: 1885: 1881: 1867: 1950:, who does this over several pages whenever the subject is the US failed to note that the phenomenon is already cited earlier on this page to define US actions ( 1200:

from the first paragraph. I am sure that both Bahrain and China, at least, can be described this way and there appears no reason to remove this from the article.

848:

just because they are not handy for you to look at online free. Very few scientific or medical journals are free online either, nor are most copyrighted books.

2648: 453: 369: 359: 1974: 1837: 397: 2294:- This does not require a survey of editor's opinions. Neither source provided appears to use the term at all to describe the events. The addition is a best 577: 2658: 2653: 1473:

and leaving a link in this article, rather than have this article be yet another poisonous Israel/Palestinian POV-pushers battleground? Also, regarding

1813: 2117:

points out (notice of course that Nishidani didn't include those refs) the death was not targeted, he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

1970: 1793: 1954:). Further, while advising me to address the talk page, he reverted without giving any argument at all for the removal. POV pushing, as it stands. 1527: 335: 2643: 1335:

of declaring that the Israeli groups responding to the biased reporting from these groups are themselves "less notable" or, more to the point,

419: 392: 428: 2633: 1041: 280: 270: 38:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic: 1392:, to which the issues probably fit better. The entire section could easily be replaced with a link to an appropriate section on that page. 2534: 2139:– no one was seeking to "punish" the family member. No more so than in any other war where families and/or civilians suffer and die. – 1308:

outrageous claims against Israel, and yet it took the UN more than a year to even take up the question of what was happening in Darfur.

681:

understanding of "due process" (although that has taken quite a hit lately with the problems the US has discovered with due process).

326: 303: 1050:

It seems a poor example and is totally unsourced, being just your opinion. It should not be included, barring any reliable sources.

630:

balanced, but please take your anti-Israel stance to a discussion board (e.g., here) rather than hashing it out on the article page.

2638: 2390:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2157: 763: 711: 644: 640: 2256:- the sources simply don't say this (i.e., it's OR). Fails on its face. And "Mintpress News" is not a reliable source in any case. 1735:

If editors are continuing to work toward resolution of any issue and I missed it, however, please feel free to restore. Cheers, --

719:

violate proportionality. What I am asking is if anyone feels, as per the prior version of the article, that collective punishment

1666:

scale of atrocities afflicted across nations but this belies it's significance in terms of it's social and psychological impact.

841:

presently have them in their own collection. They are also availble online for a fee through Proquest subscription, for instance

1172:

and refrain from mischaracterizing your edits as you do nothing but increase the temperature of the disagreement when you do so.

1981:. And neither of them mention the words "collective punishment" or even address the topic by any other name. As I explained in 1438:, which used to devote a lot of weight to Isr-Pal, to the detriment of a broad historical analysis. The solution there (thanks 1251:- what issue did you have with this? As the drug trade and organized crime are mixed together this edit seems reasonable to me. 1128: 1946:

I restored appropriately sourced information regarding the kin of terrorists killed by US forces in recent air strikes. The

1235:

Line 34 - in relation to the Geneva Convention, it appears here it is you who is removing a great deal of sourced information.

1823: 757:

collective punishment, according to this very article (especially earlier versions), punishing family members of terrorists

2075:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1838:

http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Syria+army+bulldozes+houses+Sunni+Muslim+areas+collective+punishment/7187238/story.html

2628: 2600: 2598: 2470:

Internment of Japanese citizens in the United States. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. More, I would imagine.

2341:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2243: 1459: 1106: 1140: 943:, and saying that "they" specifically object to anything in particular is silly, since "they" is too broad to begin with. 2455: 2380: 2232:

collateral damage is hardly new, and while tragic, no evidence seems to suggest family member death was intentional. --

2055: 1928: 1549: 1470: 1389: 653: 177: 74: 45: 31: 1089:, which has looked at the charges, conclude that it's collective punishment. Neutrality here does not mean 1:1, that's 2094: 1991: 2529:

being banned from any future Ajax-Zwolle games the following three years. Similar incidents have occurred in Sweden.

2370: 1814:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090806104429/http://www.volgagermans.net/volgagermans/Volga%20German%20Deportation.htm

149:

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

1803: 1135: 785: 743: 695: 137: 70: 35: 1523: 1075: 830:

If the latter, then it's not the well-recognised crime of "communal punishment" (whatever themselves called it).

241: 202: 2411:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1884:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1794:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070709020049/http://www.am.gov.lv/en/latvia/History-of-Occupation/briefing-paper4/

1256: 973: 576:

No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the

1037: 120:

Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

2510: 2446: 2362: 1919: 1817: 1785: 1519: 1324:

and I think you should do so as well. Normally, HRW/Amnesty International would be considered reliable, but

1071: 423:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 245:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the 101: 49: 1272:

reverted much more than you otherwise would, given the poisonous nature of the Israeli/Palestinian debate.

767: 2574: 2303: 1712:

I've removed an old POV template with a dormant discussion, per the instructions on that template's page:

1675: 129: 62: 1033: 73:

may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the

2542: 2494: 2430:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2418: 2354: 2161: 2114: 2085: 1903:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1891: 1797: 1777: 932: 183: 2361:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1784:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1607: 1577: 831: 2330: 2144: 2129: 2031: 1858: 1718:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1592: 1557: 1515: 1487: 1408: 1347: 1277: 1150: 1029: 2606: 2215:

This tendentious editing borders on disruptive. How could "collective punishment" be unintentional?

165: 2610: 2514: 2486: 2475: 2220: 2007: 1959: 1651: 766:

as we're using it does not agree with the link formerly in the article. If someone wants to start

133: 66: 1603: 1573: 762:

innocents, but that's the point of collective punishment: It harms innocents. (Also, once again,

334:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2518: 2203: 1439: 1382: 1124: 2415:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

2177:

the source doesn't even mention the words collective punishment.So we can't include it anyhow.--

1888:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1553: 1483: 1404: 1343: 1273: 1146: 2431: 1904: 2570: 2238: 1740: 1671: 1536: 1454: 1101: 2566: 2538: 2490: 2182: 1759: 1724:

It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given

1695: 1623: 1435: 1295: 1213: 1205: 128:

procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the

2438: 1911: 1721:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved

2327: 2295: 2282: 2257: 2140: 2126: 2089: 2028: 1986: 1824:

https://web.archive.org/web/20091015035819/http://www.euronet.nl/users/sota/statshist.html

1588: 1247: 1195: 1169: 649: 125: 2601:

https://www.reddit.com/r/discordapp/comments/svbyzp/can_you_get_banned_for_association/

2471: 2397:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2269: 2216: 2046: 2003: 1955: 1870:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1647: 1639: 1502: 1367: 1338: 1225: 1085:

The Palestinians say that it's collective punishment; the Israeli's say that it isn't.

2437:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1910:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1422:

That said, I agree that the article is probably bent out of shape by disproportionate

1206:

the demolition of homes which Israel alleges are used by terrorists as military assets

55:

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

2622: 2381:

https://web.archive.org/web/20010301223347/http://www.rel.ee/eng/communism_crimes.htm

2299: 2199: 1643: 1378: 1316:

outright lies. The Israel/Palestine situation is a poisonous atmosphere, and so I am

1269: 1165: 1090: 940: 844:. There is no Knowledge policy allowing the deletion of reliable sources satisfying 140:. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. 2562: 2558: 2233: 2195: 2174: 1978: 1736: 1706: 1478: 1447: 1229: 1133: 1094: 1051: 998: 910: 771: 724: 658: 631: 331: 143: 20: 2371:

http://www.webcitation.org/64HKWGqzR?url=http://ukrhistory.tripod.com/page-20.html

1827: 217: 196: 2592:

appears to have a policy of banning by association for serious crimes. Sources:

677:

law. However, what he did to some citizens was not proportional. It also fails

2614: 2578: 2546: 2530: 2498: 2479: 2460: 2404: 2332: 2314: 2286: 2260: 2248: 2224: 2207: 2186: 2178: 2165: 2148: 2131: 2099: 2063: 2033: 2011: 1996: 1963: 1933: 1877: 1804:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090420175950/http://www.ahtg.net/TpA/baltstat.html

1763: 1755: 1744: 1699: 1691: 1679: 1655: 1627: 1619: 1611: 1596: 1581: 1561: 1539: 1506: 1491: 1463: 1412: 1351: 1299: 1291: 1281: 1154: 1110: 1079: 1054: 1013: 1001: 913: 852: 849: 845: 834: 810: 807: 793: 774: 751: 727: 703: 661: 634: 568: 227: 2595: 2593: 2526: 2403:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2278: 1876:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1477:- I refer you to above, where I was able to find a number of sources that fit 1010: 977: 318: 297: 233: 223: 2384: 1383:"noxious atmosphere which pervades Israeli-Palestinian articles on Knowledge" 1328:

all sides need to be triple-checked or more and their biases accounted for.

2374: 1498: 1357:

Should the Israeli/Palestinian conflict issues be discussed in this article?

1131: 780: 738: 690: 626: 105:

related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.

2569:

advice is a way to increase the chance of the edit request being accepted.

2080:

Is a US drone strike that killed the child of a suspected terrorist, added

1951: 1727:

In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

2522: 1818:

http://www.volgagermans.net/volgagermans/Volga%20German%20Deportation.htm

1261:

article 28 prohibits using civilians to protect military assets/personnel

2525:

supporter club being fined 70,000€ and its supporters and supporters of

1807: 2589: 34:

procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the

643:, since collective punishment can be proportional in the sense of the 2016:

You are the one who cherry picked sources. This is from the article:

1798:

http://www.am.gov.lv/en/latvia/History-of-Occupation/briefing-paper4/

1020:

Are the embargoes on Northern Cyprus a form of collective punishment

1181:

Specific items it would be helpful for you to justify in regard to

1137: 411: 386: 2664:

Military history articles needing attention to task force coverage

1087:

Every single human rights organization, including the Israeli ones

936: 1214:

the Israeli policy of destroying the homes of alleged terrorists

919:

I didn't revert you (yet), but I want to give a response anyway:

613: 1469:

Is that not what I just suggested, spinning the content out to

1129:

Criticism_of_Human_Rights_Watch#Allegations_of_anti-Israel_bias

926:

For the first point, I'd prefer, "critics of Israel's actions"

2513:

describes how the throwing of fireworks onto the field in the

1168:

issue with this article. I would like to remind you to remain

246: 159: 15: 98:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace

1843:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

1446:, while leaving a summary and link in the main article. < 1337:

not worthy of having their side represented in keeping with

567: 452: 142:

Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the

2561:. If they are not extendedconfirmed they should submit an 2365:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1788:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

868:"supporters of the Palestinians" to "human rights groups". 95:

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

61:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

612:

You could add in something about the guerre de la vendee

1259:(article 33 specifically forbids collective punishment, 1218:

It appears to me that the prior wording is more neutral.

1123:

To play devil's advocate, it appears that agencies like

2358: 2081: 1982: 1947: 1943: 1781: 1182: 2277:

at a violent individual and accidentally hits a baby.

1159:

Also Eleland, it would be helpful if you were to list

987:

By the way, you reverted many of the things I wrote —

48:

to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for

2605:

Or would that be more appropriate on Discord's page?

1320:

when viewing reports on it even from sources I would

1444:

House demolition in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

465:

This article has been checked against the following

330:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2407:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2156:Collateral damage, yes. Collective punishment, no. 2053:

the event (as an example of collective punishment).

1880:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 550: 464: 1550:Israeli-Palestinian_conflict#Collective_punishment 1442:) was to spinout most of the Isr-Pal content into 859:Collective punishment & Israel -- recent edits 1567:In the Israeli/Palestinian conflict - irrelevant 1396:I believe that point #3 is the best solution to 1969:The two sources you've provided for this edit ( 1828:http://www.euronet.nl/users/sota/statshist.html 1705:removing POV tag with no active discussion per 1127:are also noted as being biased against Israel: 2393:This message was posted before February 2018. 1866:This message was posted before February 2018. 1402:make this topic easier for editors to improve. 616:The first democratically sanctioned genocide 8: 2485:Slavery in the US is replete with examples. 1385:does not spread further than it already has. 904:should at least be reported as allegations. 2596:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9rOLaH5dJs 2588:Does this topic apply to websites? Because 614:http://fr.wikipedia.org/Colonnes_infernales 2565:and someone will handle it. Following the 2385:http://www.rel.ee/eng/communism_crimes.htm 547: 461: 381: 292: 191: 83: 2375:http://ukrhistory.tripod.com/page-20.html 2353:I have just modified 2 external links on 1776:I have just modified 5 external links on 877:"use the term to refer to" to "described" 417:This article is within the scope of the 113:With respect to the WP:1RR restriction: 383: 294: 193: 163: 2489:and similar events also come to mind. 1161:specific items you have a dispute with 437:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 427:. To use this banner, please see the 1855:to let others know (documentation at 1808:http://www.ahtg.net/TpA/baltstat.html 440:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 2649:Mid-importance Human rights articles 2552:WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES 2298:and at worst both synth and blatant 2071:The following discussion is closed. 1241:Probably needs a secondary sourcing. 324:This article is within the scope of 239:This article is within the scope of 27:Warning: active arbitration remedies 1434:This may be a similar situation to 249:and the subjects encompassed by it. 182:It is of interest to the following 52:, provided they are not disruptive) 2268:. Neither of the sources cited by 2049:closure.Unanimous consensus is to 1398:prevent edit warring on this topic 344:Knowledge:WikiProject Human rights 14: 2659:B-Class military history articles 2654:WikiProject Human rights articles 2357:. Please take a moment to review 1780:. Please take a moment to review 712:Proportionality (political maxim) 645:proportionality (political maxim) 641:proportionality (political maxim) 347:Template:WikiProject Human rights 2337:The discussion above is closed. 1375:contain this as much as possible 524: 513: 502: 491: 480: 410: 396: 385: 317: 296: 226: 216: 195: 164: 19: 1977:) are both opinion pieces, not 1685:Violation of international law? 1388:- There is a separate article, 1246:]] or otherwise connected with 364:This article has been rated as 275:This article has been rated as 1548:, I have moved the section to 1: 2644:B-Class Human rights articles 2315:15:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC) 2287:12:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC) 2261:06:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC) 2064:14:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC) 1934:21:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC) 1700:22:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 1597:00:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1582:10:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 1540:19:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1507:08:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1492:08:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1464:07:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1413:07:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1352:16:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 1300:13:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 1282:16:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1155:07:32, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1111:07:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1080:19:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 338:and see a list of open tasks. 75:contentious topics procedures 2333:21:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 2249:19:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC) 2225:01:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC) 2208:22:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 2187:13:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 2166:00:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC) 2149:21:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 2132:21:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 2100:20:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 2034:21:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 2012:20:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 1997:17:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 1985:, this doesn't belong here. 1964:17:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 1764:14:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 1745:12:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 1546:As Per Consensus of this RfC 1471:Israeli-Palestinian conflict 1426:on Isr-Pal, but it would be 1390:Israeli-Palestinian conflict 835:20:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 816:Detectable POV going on here 654:Japanese American internment 639:I'm deleting the mention of 420:Military history WikiProject 2634:Mid-importance law articles 2461:16:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC) 1612:11:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2680: 2579:01:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC) 2547:14:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2533:in a similar incident was 2499:14:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2480:00:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC) 2466:US is conspicuously absent 2424:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2350:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1897:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1773:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1680:09:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 1368:Knowledge is not a soapbox 1322:otherwise find trustworthy 485:Referencing and citation: 370:project's importance scale 281:project's importance scale 44:You must be logged-in and 2111:Not collective punishment 1628:00:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 1562:22:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1530:) 14:51, 25 February 2008 1512:That would be fine by me. 1055:04:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 1014:05:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1002:04:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 914:02:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 853:15:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 811:05:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 794:00:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 775:21:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 770:, that might be useful.) 752:11:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 732:Can you come up with any 728:03:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 704:01:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 662:22:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 635:20:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 575: 546: 443:military history articles 405: 363: 312: 274: 255:Knowledge:WikiProject Law 211: 190: 77:before editing this page. 2639:WikiProject Law articles 2505:Football supporter clubs 2339:Please do not modify it. 2073:Please do not modify it. 1656:10:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC) 1257:Fourth Geneva Convention 974:Fourth Geneva Convention 723:violate proportionality. 327:WikiProject Human rights 258:Template:WikiProject Law 138:normal editorial process 71:normal editorial process 2615:07:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC) 2584:Application to websites 2346:External links modified 1769:External links modified 1661:Narrow scope of article 551:Additional information: 496:Coverage and accuracy: 144:Arbitration enforcement 2125: 2039:RFC on US drone strike 2018: 1634:The article in general 1061:Needs more information 578:main project talk page 572: 529:Supporting materials: 457: 172:This article is rated 134:standards of behaviour 67:standards of behaviour 2355:Collective punishment 2120: 2115:Abdulrahman_al-Awlaki 2086:collective punishment 2017: 1778:Collective punishment 933:Amnesty International 768:proportionality (war) 571: 456: 350:Human rights articles 36:Arab–Israeli conflict 2629:B-Class law articles 2405:regular verification 1878:regular verification 1196:totalitarian regimes 130:purpose of Knowledge 124:After being warned, 63:purpose of Knowledge 50:making edit requests 2537:(80,000€) by UEFA. 2515:2014 KNVB Cup final 2395:After February 2018 2321:Threaded Discussion 1952:in the 20th century 1868:After February 2018 1847:parameter below to 518:Grammar and style: 471:for B-class status: 88:Further information 2521:) resulted in the 2519:Fireworks incident 2449:InternetArchiveBot 2400:InternetArchiveBot 2074: 1922:InternetArchiveBot 1873:InternetArchiveBot 1333:fall into the trap 1125:Human Rights Watch 989:without discussion 573: 458: 425:list of open tasks 178:content assessment 126:contentious topics 104: 102:make edit requests 46:extended-confirmed 32:contentious topics 28: 2559:extendedconfirmed 2425: 2072: 1898: 1531: 1520:ForeverFreeSpeech 1518:comment added by 1377:so that (quoting 1072:ForeverFreeSpeech 1046: 1032:comment added by 596: 595: 592: 591: 588: 587: 584: 583: 542: 541: 429:full instructions 380: 379: 376: 375: 291: 290: 287: 286: 158: 157: 154: 153: 99: 26: 2671: 2459: 2450: 2423: 2422: 2401: 2312: 2309: 2306: 2246: 2241: 2236: 2097: 2092: 2084:, an example of 2062: 2060: 1994: 1989: 1948:reverting editor 1932: 1923: 1896: 1895: 1874: 1862: 1513: 1436:House demolition 1045: 1026: 790: 789: 748: 747: 700: 699: 558: 548: 532: 528: 527: 521: 517: 516: 510: 506: 505: 499: 495: 494: 488: 484: 483: 462: 445: 444: 441: 438: 435: 434:Military history 414: 407: 406: 401: 400: 399: 393:Military history 389: 382: 352: 351: 348: 345: 342: 321: 314: 313: 308: 300: 293: 263: 262: 259: 256: 253: 236: 231: 230: 220: 213: 212: 207: 199: 192: 175: 169: 168: 160: 84: 23: 16: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2619: 2618: 2586: 2554: 2535:fined 800,000kr 2517:(the so-called 2507: 2468: 2453: 2448: 2416: 2409:have permission 2399: 2363:this simple FaQ 2348: 2343: 2342: 2323: 2310: 2307: 2304: 2244: 2239: 2234: 2107: 2095: 2090: 2077: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2056: 2054: 2041: 1992: 1987: 1983:my edit summary 1941: 1926: 1921: 1889: 1882:have permission 1872: 1856: 1786:this simple FaQ 1771: 1752: 1710: 1687: 1663: 1636: 1618:the article. -- 1569: 1359: 1248:organized crime 1192:the removal of 1063: 1027: 1022: 861: 818: 792: 787: 786: 764:proportionality 750: 745: 744: 702: 697: 696: 650:proportionality 622: 610: 601: 556: 530: 525: 519: 514: 508: 503: 497: 492: 486: 481: 442: 439: 436: 433: 432: 395: 349: 346: 343: 340: 339: 306: 260: 257: 254: 251: 250: 242:WikiProject Law 232: 225: 205: 176:on Knowledge's 173: 150: 132:, any expected 89: 65:, any expected 58: 12: 11: 5: 2677: 2675: 2667: 2666: 2661: 2656: 2651: 2646: 2641: 2636: 2631: 2621: 2620: 2585: 2582: 2553: 2550: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2467: 2464: 2443: 2442: 2435: 2388: 2387: 2379:Added archive 2377: 2369:Added archive 2347: 2344: 2336: 2322: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2289: 2263: 2251: 2227: 2210: 2192:Doesn't belong 2189: 2171:Doesn't belong 2168: 2151: 2119: 2118: 2106: 2103: 2078: 2069: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 1940: 1937: 1916: 1915: 1908: 1841: 1840: 1832:Added archive 1830: 1822:Added archive 1820: 1812:Added archive 1810: 1802:Added archive 1800: 1792:Added archive 1770: 1767: 1751: 1748: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1709: 1703: 1686: 1683: 1662: 1659: 1635: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1586: 1568: 1565: 1543: 1542: 1510: 1509: 1467: 1466: 1432: 1420: 1394: 1393: 1386: 1371: 1358: 1355: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1266: 1265: 1252: 1242: 1236: 1233: 1219: 1201: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1157: 1142: 1114: 1113: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1034:86.136.245.111 1021: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1005: 1004: 993: 992: 984: 983: 982: 981: 966: 965: 964: 963: 956: 955: 954: 953: 947: 946: 945: 944: 921: 920: 897: 896: 888: 887: 879: 878: 870: 869: 860: 857: 856: 855: 817: 814: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 784: 742: 694: 670: 621: 618: 609: 606: 600: 599:rename article 597: 594: 593: 590: 589: 586: 585: 582: 581: 574: 564: 563: 561: 559: 553: 552: 544: 543: 540: 539: 537: 535: 534: 533: 522: 511: 500: 489: 475: 474: 472: 459: 449: 448: 446: 415: 403: 402: 390: 378: 377: 374: 373: 366:Mid-importance 362: 356: 355: 353: 336:the discussion 322: 310: 309: 307:Mid‑importance 301: 289: 288: 285: 284: 277:Mid-importance 273: 267: 266: 264: 238: 237: 221: 209: 208: 206:Mid‑importance 200: 188: 187: 181: 170: 156: 155: 152: 151: 147: 141: 122: 121: 118: 111: 110: 106: 94: 91: 90: 87: 57: 56: 53: 41: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2676: 2665: 2662: 2660: 2657: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2647: 2645: 2642: 2640: 2637: 2635: 2632: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2624: 2617: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2603: 2602: 2599: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2583: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2551: 2549: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2465: 2463: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2451: 2440: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2420: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2396: 2391: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2351: 2345: 2340: 2335: 2334: 2331: 2329: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2290: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2262: 2259: 2255: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2211: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2124: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2093: 2087: 2083: 2076: 2065: 2061: 2059: 2058:Winged Blades 2052: 2048: 2038: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1990: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1938: 1936: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1924: 1913: 1909: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1893: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1869: 1864: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1774: 1768: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1749: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1726: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1708: 1704: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1684: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1667: 1660: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1452: 1450: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1399: 1391: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1379:User:Mastcell 1376: 1372: 1369: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1356: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1334: 1329: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1313: 1309: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1260: 1258: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1209: 1207: 1202: 1199: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1158: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1097: 1092: 1091:false balance 1088: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1007: 1006: 1003: 1000: 995: 994: 990: 986: 985: 979: 975: 970: 969: 968: 967: 960: 959: 958: 957: 951: 950: 949: 948: 942: 938: 934: 929: 925: 924: 923: 922: 918: 917: 916: 915: 912: 908: 905: 901: 894: 893: 892: 885: 884: 883: 876: 875: 874: 867: 866: 865: 858: 854: 851: 847: 843: 839: 838: 837: 836: 833: 828: 825: 821: 815: 813: 812: 809: 795: 791: 788:Contributions 782: 778: 777: 776: 773: 769: 765: 760: 755: 754: 753: 749: 746:Contributions 740: 735: 731: 730: 729: 726: 722: 718: 713: 708: 707: 706: 705: 701: 698:Contributions 692: 688: 682: 680: 676: 669: 665: 663: 660: 655: 651: 646: 642: 637: 636: 633: 628: 619: 617: 615: 607: 605: 598: 579: 570: 566: 565: 562: 560: 555: 554: 549: 545: 538: 536: 531:criterion met 523: 520:criterion met 512: 509:criterion met 501: 498:criterion met 490: 487:criterion met 479: 478: 477: 476: 473: 470: 469: 463: 460: 455: 451: 450: 447: 430: 426: 422: 421: 416: 413: 409: 408: 404: 394: 391: 388: 384: 371: 367: 361: 358: 357: 354: 337: 333: 329: 328: 323: 320: 316: 315: 311: 305: 302: 299: 295: 282: 278: 272: 269: 268: 265: 248: 244: 243: 235: 229: 224: 222: 219: 215: 214: 210: 204: 201: 198: 194: 189: 185: 179: 171: 167: 162: 161: 148: 145: 139: 135: 131: 127: 119: 116: 115: 114: 107: 103: 97: 96: 93: 92: 86: 85: 82: 78: 76: 72: 68: 64: 59: 54: 51: 47: 43: 42: 39: 37: 33: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2604: 2587: 2571:Sean.hoyland 2555: 2508: 2469: 2447: 2444: 2419:source check 2398: 2392: 2389: 2352: 2349: 2338: 2324: 2291: 2274: 2265: 2253: 2229: 2212: 2191: 2170: 2153: 2136: 2121: 2110: 2079: 2070: 2057: 2050: 2025: 1942: 1920: 1917: 1892:source check 1871: 1865: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1842: 1775: 1772: 1753: 1734: 1711: 1707:Template:POV 1688: 1672:Fourisplenty 1668: 1664: 1637: 1600: 1585: 1570: 1545: 1544: 1537:Sχeptomaniac 1511: 1474: 1468: 1455: 1448: 1427: 1423: 1401: 1397: 1395: 1374: 1360: 1336: 1332: 1330: 1326:in this case 1325: 1321: 1318:very careful 1317: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1267: 1262: 1254: 1245: 1238: 1221: 1211: 1203: 1193: 1160: 1115: 1102: 1095: 1086: 1068: 1064: 1023: 988: 927: 909: 906: 902: 898: 889: 880: 871: 862: 829: 826: 822: 819: 804: 758: 733: 720: 716: 686: 683: 678: 674: 671: 666: 652:in war, the 638: 623: 611: 602: 466: 418: 365: 341:Human rights 332:Human rights 325: 304:Human rights 276: 261:law articles 240: 184:WikiProjects 146:noticeboard. 123: 112: 79: 60: 40: 29: 2539:KetchupSalt 2491:KetchupSalt 2240:Consermonor 2158:74.70.146.1 1859:Sourcecheck 1690:this view? 1514:—Preceding 1479:reliability 1440:User:ChrisO 1210:changed to 1028:—Preceding 832:MalcolmKing 507:Structure: 247:legal field 2623:Categories 2527:PEC Zwolle 2511:this paper 2456:Report bug 2328:Sir Joseph 2258:Neutrality 2217:—DIYeditor 2213:Disruptive 2127:Sir Joseph 2029:Sir Joseph 1979:journalism 1929:Report bug 1589:Grace Note 1244:Line 50 - 1232:standards. 978:Protocol I 234:Law portal 2607:Wiimeiser 2567:WP:EDITXY 2472:MultiPoly 2439:this tool 2432:this tool 2270:Nishidani 2245:Opus meum 2004:Nishidani 1956:Nishidani 1912:this tool 1905:this tool 1750:Sanctions 1648:Savonneux 1183:this diff 627:code word 136:, or any 109:required. 69:, or any 2531:Malmö FF 2445:Cheers.— 2296:WP:SYNTH 2292:Snowball 2200:Pincrete 1918:Cheers.— 1528:contribs 1516:unsigned 1431:readers. 1170:WP:CIVIL 1070:fairly. 1042:contribs 1030:unsigned 468:criteria 100:only to 81:covered. 2590:Discord 2359:my edit 2305:Timothy 2235:Iazyges 2141:S. Rich 2113:as the 2047:WP:SNOW 1845:checked 1782:my edit 1737:Khazar2 1640:WP:NPOV 1604:Bob1969 1574:Bob1969 1339:WP:NPOV 1226:WP:NPOV 1052:Calbaer 999:Calbaer 911:Eleland 772:Calbaer 725:Calbaer 659:Calbaer 632:Calbaer 368:on the 279:on the 174:B-class 2308:Joseph 2300:WP:POV 2179:Shrike 2105:Survey 1939:Revert 1853:failed 1756:Matt2h 1692:Int21h 1644:WP:NOR 1620:386-DX 1381:) the 1292:Edison 1270:WP:COI 1166:WP:COI 1011:Jayjg 941:WP:AWW 850:Edison 808:Edison 608:Vendee 180:scale. 2563:WP:ER 2487:Tulsa 2279:Alsee 2196:WP:OR 2194:It's 2175:WP:OR 1554:M1rth 1484:M1rth 1462:: --> 1460:edits 1451:eland 1424:focus 1405:M1rth 1344:M1rth 1274:M1rth 1230:WP:RS 1194:"and 1147:M1rth 1109:: --> 1107:edits 1098:eland 937:Fatah 2611:talk 2575:talk 2543:talk 2523:Ajax 2495:talk 2476:talk 2311:Wood 2283:talk 2275:aims 2266:Omit 2254:Omit 2230:Omit 2221:talk 2204:talk 2183:talk 2173:Its 2162:talk 2154:Omit 2145:talk 2137:Omit 2091:Brad 2082:here 2051:omit 2008:talk 1988:Brad 1960:talk 1944:here 1849:true 1760:talk 1741:talk 1696:talk 1676:talk 1652:talk 1642:and 1624:talk 1608:talk 1593:talk 1578:talk 1558:talk 1524:talk 1503:talk 1499:6SJ7 1488:talk 1456:talk 1409:talk 1400:and 1348:talk 1296:talk 1278:talk 1228:and 1151:talk 1103:talk 1076:talk 1038:talk 976:and 935:and 846:WP:A 734:real 721:must 30:The 2413:RfC 2383:to 2373:to 1886:RfC 1863:). 1851:or 1836:to 1826:to 1816:to 1806:to 1796:to 1428:way 781:Ted 739:Ted 717:can 691:Ted 687:etc 679:our 620:POV 360:Mid 271:Mid 252:Law 203:Law 2625:: 2613:) 2577:) 2545:) 2497:) 2478:) 2426:. 2421:}} 2417:{{ 2302:. 2285:) 2223:) 2206:) 2185:) 2164:) 2147:) 2088:? 2010:) 1973:, 1962:) 1899:. 1894:}} 1890:{{ 1861:}} 1857:{{ 1762:) 1743:) 1698:) 1678:) 1654:) 1626:) 1610:) 1602:-- 1595:) 1580:) 1560:) 1552:. 1526:• 1505:) 1490:) 1449:el 1411:) 1366:- 1350:) 1298:) 1280:) 1216:." 1153:) 1096:el 1078:) 1044:) 1040:• 928:or 759:is 675:is 664:. 557:/ 2609:( 2573:( 2541:( 2493:( 2474:( 2458:) 2454:( 2441:. 2434:. 2281:( 2219:( 2202:( 2181:( 2160:( 2143:( 2096:v 2006:( 1993:v 1975:2 1971:1 1958:( 1931:) 1927:( 1914:. 1907:. 1758:( 1739:( 1694:( 1674:( 1650:( 1622:( 1606:( 1591:( 1576:( 1556:( 1522:( 1501:( 1486:( 1453:/ 1407:( 1346:( 1342:. 1294:( 1276:( 1255:* 1212:" 1208:" 1204:" 1198:" 1185:: 1149:( 1100:/ 1074:( 1036:( 980:. 783:/ 741:/ 693:/ 580:. 431:. 372:. 283:. 186::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index