919:
editor will see that nearly 90% of those letters reflect readers with left to very left views. Examples of specific left leaning writers include: Ross Gitins in
Business - overtly pro Keynesian, pro high taxation and larger size of govt - these are clearly Center left views and cannot be described as centrist. Despite the current Federal Govts large govt spending his columns are laced with ideological opposition. There are many other examples, Elizabeth Farrelly on planning; Jacqueline Malley; Waled Aly; Peter Fitzsimmons - I could go on and on. One more example - the OECD says Australia has the second highest taxes on profits and wages yet - the SMH has been relentless in its campaign against the current govts tax cuts - despite most economists describing them as offering mere compensation for bracket creep. In general on any economic matter - the SMH references the left wing Australia Institute with no disclosure as to it’s links to the Labor party. Please be fair and update this page to reflect its clear center left ideological position.
694:
908:
approach. It is a liberal conservative paper that propagates general bourgeois values like humanist charity, minority loving, human rights, liberal economies, constantly abused principles etc. The
Telegraph is not so much right-wing as populist and is obviously a Murdoch paper. Politically they are not really worth comparing as the SMH takes a stance that has at its core, very bourgeois policy support. The SMH will support the most John Stuart Mills type of party and the Telegraph will support whoever they think will win. --
551:
297:
648:
361:
456:
351:
435:
330:
565:
524:
575:
672:
214:
544:
244:
288:
713:
958:
The suggestion that the Herald has “recently become more right wing” is not supported by the book cited at footnote 23. To suggest that Peter
Costello is “in charge” of the Herald is incorrect, and it is also incorrect to suggest that the Herald has recently become more right wing, particularly given
1091:
I wonder whether this section should be removed altogether. It is incomplete and does not seem to be useful, and journalists frequently change roles and publications making it difficult to keep up to date. Could any additional notable journalists simply be captured under the "notable contributors"
918:
The SMH is undoubtedly a center left paper and it should be stated as so. It is similar to the
Australian as it has a lot of hard news but there are numerous examples of its writers and editorial page display a clear moderate left bias. Furthermore anyone who reads the pages of the Letters to the
907:
The herald is a part of the liberal media. Deviantly capitalistic and ready to exploit any oppurtunity to denounce left wing principles, it even calls soccer football in keeping with its general accelerated decadent world media "oppurtunity to be a part of the world community" liberal type of
1106:
I think its a useful section to be able to have a place to list journalists names; because many journalists on the regular roster aren't notable in their own right and so otherwise wouldn't appear on the Wiki. For those journalists especially, we can use this section as a
1033:
I demonstrated that your claims were wrong. Now you're simply repeating your opinions. They really should have changed just a little but based on the new information I have provided to you. And obviously historical positions are irrelevant here. Please also learn about
1110:
Sure it may be incomplete. Don't agree it'd be difficult to keep up to date or with that being much of an issue. Plenty of incomplete lists exist on
Knowledge; editors are free to contribute in their own time to improving little sections like this if they so choose.
974:
That book was published seven years ago. That's not recent. It was published BEFORE the creation of Nine
Entertainment, so irrelevant to your argument. And it's ridiculous to suggest the chairman of the board has no influence.
867:
I read the smh pretty regularly and agree with the above statements. It tends to take a centre left approach to most issues like social justice, environmentalism, multiculturalism and republicanism. For comparison check out
164:
1204:
301:
832:
Can we just sit on the fence and describe it as centrist? The paper's editorial position depends on the issue. It generally leans towards economic and social liberalism, but that's a very broad generalisation.
1129:
Mostly every other newspaper / media outlet page (both
Australian and international) just maintains a list of notable contributors. Should every company's page on Knowledge include a list of employees .. ?
1194:
993:
The proposition that it has become recently more right wing is unsupported by any objective sources. It seems to be your opinion. Is there any reputable, objective source that supports that proposition?
1209:
858:
The Herald has endorsed the NSW Liberal/National parties at every NSw election except the last one. That said, I think a better description than 'centre-right' or 'centre-left' is 'anti-incumbent'.
1062:
A roster sounds like the list of players in an
American football team. I have never before seen it used to describe such a list in Australia. How about simply "List of Journalists"?
158:
959:
it endorsed Labor at the 2019 and 2022 federal elections, the first time it endorsed Labor since 2007. This suggests that the Herald has in fact recently become more left-wing.
851:
Is "political allengience" necessary? Anyhow, I for one agree that 'centrist' is the most accurate description; publishing stories on 'social issues' doesn't make it a lefty.
205:
55:
1234:
1002:
Costello is not the editor or even the executive editor of the Herald. And your argument ignores the Herald’s historical and existing editorial independence.
496:
1219:
506:
417:
407:
264:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
1244:
638:
628:
90:
842:
the paper decided in 2004 that it would no longer offer an editorial endorsement of either side in elections. seems pretty determinedly centrist to me
1189:
1254:
1224:
662:
201:
1264:
1199:
1179:
251:
750:
472:
383:
96:
1259:
1229:
1214:
764:
I am changing the sensationalistic in the description of the Daily
Telegraph, this seems bias in disscussing a papers reporting practices.
804:
Better tell those paragons of bleeding heart liberalism
Miranda Devine and Gerald Henderson they're with the wrong paper in that case. --
1239:
550:
179:
771:
146:
1249:
463:
440:
374:
335:
1184:
604:
591:
529:
267:
255:
110:
41:
115:
31:
543:
140:
85:
657:
534:
310:
136:
76:
1011:
The simple fact is that the proposition is unsupported, and such a proposition ought be supported by a reference.
213:
196:
924:
743:
I find the description about the Daily Telegraph to lean towards being biased. You may want to try rewording it.
186:
35:
224:
754:
775:
273:
120:
920:
1135:
1097:
316:
152:
767:
746:
877:
693:
287:
1012:
960:
881:
869:
852:
819:
172:
66:
647:
471:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
382:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1152:
1116:
1082:
1016:
964:
824:
600:
229:
81:
703:
366:
261:
62:
1131:
1093:
1067:
1043:
1035:
980:
943:
795:
580:
226:
909:
1147:
Journalists aren’t ordinary employees. I don’t agree with the comparison you’ve drawn.
938:. Without a reliable, independent source supporting your view, it is of no value here.
934:
Thank you for your personal opinion, but be aware that content in Knowledge depends on
873:
1156:
1139:
1120:
1101:
1086:
1071:
1047:
1020:
984:
968:
947:
928:
912:
885:
862:
846:
837:
827:
808:
798:
779:
758:
1173:
1148:
1126:
1112:
1078:
815:
805:
228:
935:
859:
1063:
1039:
976:
939:
834:
791:
790:
The Sydney Morning Herald? Cente Right? Get out! The paper openly supported the
564:
523:
813:
They're exceptions. The overall editorial leaning of the paper is centre-left.
671:
570:
468:
455:
434:
379:
356:
350:
329:
17:
843:
596:
276:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
876:. The general consensus seems to be in favour to edit its allegiance.
684:
1205:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
281:
238:
230:
26:
692:
670:
646:
1195:
Knowledge vital articles in Society and social sciences
171:
1210:
B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
467:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
378:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
595:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
603:. If you would like to participate, visit the
1038:to maintain coherent Talk page discussions..
185:
8:
765:
744:
518:
429:
324:
520:
431:
326:
285:
7:
1077:List of journalists sounds good too
461:This article is within the scope of
372:This article is within the scope of
1235:High-importance Newspapers articles
315:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
1220:Low-importance Journalism articles
679:Need help improving this article?
25:
1245:Mid-importance Australia articles
954:“Recently become more right wing”
1190:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
711:
573:
563:
549:
542:
522:
481:Knowledge:WikiProject Newspapers
454:
433:
392:Knowledge:WikiProject Journalism
359:
349:
328:
295:
286:
242:
212:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
1255:High-importance Sydney articles
1225:WikiProject Journalism articles
633:This article has been rated as
613:Knowledge:WikiProject Australia
501:This article has been rated as
484:Template:WikiProject Newspapers
412:This article has been rated as
395:Template:WikiProject Journalism
266:Content must be written from a
250:The subject of this article is
1265:WikiProject Australia articles
1200:B-Class level-5 vital articles
1180:Knowledge controversial topics
863:03:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
707:can be contacted via email to
616:Template:WikiProject Australia
1:
1092:section as many already are?
719:for non-editorial assistance.
685:National Library of Australia
655:This article is supported by
475:and see a list of open tasks.
386:and see a list of open tasks.
53:Put new text under old text.
948:00:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
929:12:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
913:11:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
886:13:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
1260:WikiProject Sydney articles
1230:B-Class Newspapers articles
1215:B-Class Journalism articles
1048:06:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
1021:06:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
985:05:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
969:05:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
855:27 August 2006 16:48 (AET)
847:07:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
838:08:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
828:07:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
809:05:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
799:03:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
704:Wikimedia Australia chapter
260:When updating the article,
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1281:
1240:B-Class Australia articles
1157:12:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
1140:08:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
1121:02:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
1102:00:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
759:06:51, 25 March 2005 (UTC)
639:project's importance scale
507:project's importance scale
418:project's importance scale
780:12:34, 23 June 2005 (UTC)
712:
700:
678:
654:
632:
587:The Sydney Morning Herald
558:
500:
449:
411:
344:
323:
262:be bold, but not reckless
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
36:The Sydney Morning Herald
1087:06:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
1072:05:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
601:Australia-related topics
1250:B-Class Sydney articles
589:is within the scope of
1185:B-Class vital articles
1058:Roster of Journalists?
794:in the last election!
697:
675:
651:
464:WikiProject Newspapers
375:WikiProject Journalism
254:and content may be in
86:avoid personal attacks
696:
674:
650:
592:WikiProject Australia
302:level-5 vital article
268:neutral point of view
206:Auto-archiving period
111:Neutral point of view
116:No original research
870:The Daily Telegraph
487:Newspapers articles
398:Journalism articles
698:
676:
658:WikiProject Sydney
652:
619:Australia articles
311:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
936:reliable sourcing
782:
770:comment added by
761:
749:comment added by
731:
730:
727:
726:
723:
722:
517:
516:
513:
512:
428:
427:
424:
423:
367:Journalism portal
280:
279:
237:
236:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1272:
822:
818:
718:
717:wikimedia.org.au
716:
715:
714:
621:
620:
617:
614:
611:
583:
581:Australia portal
578:
577:
576:
567:
560:
559:
554:
553:
552:
547:
546:
545:
540:
537:
526:
519:
489:
488:
485:
482:
479:
458:
451:
450:
445:
437:
430:
400:
399:
396:
393:
390:
369:
364:
363:
362:
353:
346:
345:
340:
332:
325:
308:
299:
298:
291:
290:
282:
246:
245:
239:
231:
217:
216:
207:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1170:
1169:
1060:
956:
921:Dulwichhillecon
820:
814:
788:
751:144.139.183.142
741:
710:
708:
681:Ask a Librarian
663:High-importance
618:
615:
612:
609:
608:
579:
574:
572:
548:
541:
538:
532:
503:High-importance
486:
483:
480:
477:
476:
444:High‑importance
443:
397:
394:
391:
388:
387:
365:
360:
358:
338:
309:on Knowledge's
306:
296:
243:
233:
232:
227:
204:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1278:
1276:
1268:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1172:
1171:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1145:
1108:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
997:
996:
995:
994:
988:
987:
955:
952:
951:
950:
916:
915:
903:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
889:
888:
874:The Australian
787:
784:
740:
737:
735:
729:
728:
725:
724:
721:
720:
699:
689:
688:
677:
667:
666:
653:
643:
642:
635:Mid-importance
631:
625:
624:
622:
585:
584:
568:
556:
555:
539:Mid‑importance
527:
515:
514:
511:
510:
499:
493:
492:
490:
473:the discussion
459:
447:
446:
438:
426:
425:
422:
421:
414:Low-importance
410:
404:
403:
401:
384:the discussion
371:
370:
354:
342:
341:
339:Low‑importance
333:
321:
320:
314:
292:
278:
277:
247:
235:
234:
225:
223:
222:
219:
218:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1277:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1057:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
992:
991:
990:
989:
986:
982:
978:
973:
972:
971:
970:
966:
962:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
932:
931:
930:
926:
922:
914:
911:
906:
905:
904:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
866:
865:
864:
861:
857:
856:
854:
850:
849:
848:
845:
841:
840:
839:
836:
831:
830:
829:
826:
823:
817:
812:
811:
810:
807:
803:
802:
801:
800:
797:
793:
786:Centre Right?
785:
783:
781:
777:
773:
769:
762:
760:
756:
752:
748:
738:
736:
733:
706:
705:
695:
691:
690:
686:
682:
673:
669:
668:
664:
661:(assessed as
660:
659:
649:
645:
644:
640:
636:
630:
627:
626:
623:
606:
602:
598:
594:
593:
588:
582:
571:
569:
566:
562:
561:
557:
536:
531:
528:
525:
521:
508:
504:
498:
495:
494:
491:
474:
470:
466:
465:
460:
457:
453:
452:
448:
442:
439:
436:
432:
419:
415:
409:
406:
405:
402:
385:
381:
377:
376:
368:
357:
355:
352:
348:
347:
343:
337:
334:
331:
327:
322:
318:
312:
304:
303:
293:
289:
284:
283:
275:
271:
269:
263:
259:
257:
253:
252:controversial
248:
241:
240:
221:
220:
215:
211:
203:
200:
198:
194:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
18:Talk:Column 8
1061:
957:
917:
902:
789:
772:211.30.13.52
766:— Preceding
763:
745:— Preceding
742:
734:
732:
701:
680:
656:
634:
605:project page
590:
586:
502:
462:
413:
373:
317:WikiProjects
300:
265:
249:
209:
195:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
1132:Hanne Thato
1094:Hanne Thato
796:Ronan.evans
792:Labor Party
159:free images
42:not a forum
1174:Categories
910:Ehinger222
478:Newspapers
469:Newspapers
441:Newspapers
389:Journalism
380:journalism
336:Journalism
1107:redirect.
1036:WP:INDENT
878:Imalegend
610:Australia
597:Australia
530:Australia
305:is rated
274:citations
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
1149:Jack4576
1127:Jack4576
1113:Jack4576
1079:Jack4576
1013:User6784
961:User6784
853:Htra0497
806:Centauri
768:unsigned
747:unsigned
272:Include
210:365Â days
197:Archives
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
860:Jeendan
683:at the
637:on the
505:on the
416:on the
307:B-class
256:dispute
165:WPÂ refs
153:scholar
1064:HiLo48
1040:HiLo48
977:HiLo48
940:HiLo48
835:Kewpid
535:Sydney
313:scale.
137:Google
825:kelly
294:This
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1153:talk
1136:talk
1117:talk
1098:talk
1083:talk
1068:talk
1044:talk
1017:talk
981:talk
965:talk
944:talk
925:talk
882:talk
844:Dibo
776:talk
755:talk
739:Bias
709:help
702:The
599:and
497:High
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
872:or
629:Mid
408:Low
187:TWL
1176::
1155:)
1138:)
1119:)
1100:)
1085:)
1070:)
1046:)
1019:)
983:)
967:)
946:)
927:)
884:)
833:--
816:mg
778:)
757:)
665:).
533::
208::
167:)
65:;
1151:(
1144:?
1134:(
1125:@
1115:(
1096:(
1081:(
1066:(
1042:(
1015:(
979:(
963:(
942:(
923:(
880:(
821:e
774:(
753:(
687:.
641:.
607:.
509:.
420:.
319::
270:.
258:.
202:1
199::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
