Talk:Conservative Party of Canada/Archive 2

269:; not here. If Stephen Harper decides to support the bill, or there is a substantial vote by the party to support it at second reading, it should be mentioned. For now, all that has happened is that a private member introduced a bill and it won the lottery for to make it on the Order Paper. That is hardly important for this article. Finally, I never said your IP status was relevant here. If an editor who bothered to register had been involved, I would have used his or her user name. Since you don't have one, I used "IP" as I and many other do regularly. I have no desire to remember or copy and paste your particular IP address, and someone who professes, as you did on my talk page, to have been actively editing here since 2005 should have picked up on that by now. - 141:

better to simply say something like "After accusations that the conservative party was reversing its policy on same-sex marriage, Harper responded so and so." Furthermore, when the article states that Harper corrected the record it sounds as if Harper contradicted the Justice Department official's claim that the marriage is void. This is wrong. Harper actually stated that he was unfamiliar with the case. He corrected the records only in as far as he refuted claims that the conservative party was reversing its policy. It also implies that the Justice Department official was wrong, which isn't the case. Legally, the official's argument was sound.

2452: 1459:

the Government preserved the basic aspects of the Canadian welfare state (Canada Health Act, subsidized post-secondary education, etc), maintained very high levels of immigration with a strong commitment to multiculturalism and integrating newcomers, and maintained strong opposition to changing Canada's laws with regard to abortion and same-sex marriage. I think the dominant ideology of the CPC is Liberal Conservatism (David Cameron, Theresa May identify as such). Certainly fiscal conservatism, economic liberalism and a decentralized federalism form an important part of the CPC's ideology.

3485:

bent, but to say that the CPC is now a right-populist party means equally that the party was a Red Tory entity only a year or so ago (under O'Toole), and socially conservative a little before that (under Scheer). That each leader has pulled the party in a certain direction, and yet the next leader could still pull it elsewhere, says — to me — that the overall party ideology is more than one man's vision, that it is actually somewhat malleable, and that it's not particularly helpful to keep changing the designation every time someone new leads it. —

3516:

as such, it is another thing for their party to be labelled as it. Unless I am wrong and it is actually standard practice on Knowledge to treat descriptions of the leader as the same as the party. If I'm assuming right, the leader does not necessarily define the party. Due to the contentious nature of the label, an RfC may be called for in the near future. As a reminder, it doesn't matter what editors think the party's ideology is, what matters is how reliable sources (or at least those deemed reliable by consensus on Knowledge) describe it.

1835:

final speech at the leadership convention? He placed 4th meaning that his constituency is a significant part of the party. Maxime Bernier's economic message is also far more right-wing than centre-right as well and he placed a close 2nd. We must look at the significant parts of the leadership race and look at the ideologies within the party. I strongly believe that what I suggested previously is accurate and the correct ideologies within the CPC

31: 3573: 3472: 3429: 3192: 3175: 3072: 2250:

members. An example of the factions within the party can be seen with current leader Andrew Scheer (typically considered part of the social conservative faction) and his competition in the recent leadership election Maxime Bernier (openly part of the Right Libertarian faction of the party). Plus, many sources mention these are factions within the party and other political party Knowledge pages, for instance the

1633:. I think these are the most prominent factions of the party that showed themselves during the recent leadership election. Trost and Lemieux with social conservatism, Bernier with libertarian conservatism, Chong with liberal conservatism, and Leitch with right-wing populism. I am a Conservative party member and well versed in Canadian politics and know the party well. The old PC wing of the party is definitely 957:.) Knowledge policy says in part: "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves." For future edits, please provides references to such sources. Thank you. 3412:....as a fast check .....let alone our sources at politics of Canada do not say this. That said the liberals would love to hear this. We have to wait and see what he actually does.... just because he campaigned on the far right does not mean that's where we are. Liberals do the same thing campaign on the left and govern from the center. If they have any chance of winning they better stick with 1010:

Party) makes its own policies as a wholly separate entity from the Conservative Party of Canada. The Party is its own corporation whose only official link is the leader. The entire “principles and policies” section should be rewritten to reflect what the Conservative Party’s policy declaration says. Secondly, everything after “The first Harper government” should be moved into its own page.

2870: 122:, and therefore Harper's response is definitely relevant to the article in my opinion. The paragraph is accurate and is an opportunity to reflect Harper's position that he will not reopen the debate, which is important from an encyclopedic point of view (reflecting the Party's position). Though I acknowledge this could be done without mentioning the fabricated story. 2949: 2099: 1982: 3405: 2918: 3536:. Usually, articles will contain information about the significant opinions that have been expressed about their subjects. However, these opinions should not be stated in Knowledge's voice. Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc. 3081:

may have taken a more centrist line than his predecessors on some issues, but I don't see his leadership as having transformed the party so significantly that the more right-wing flank no longer exists. Since the CPC can be described as having two competing factions, the position should reflect that. —

3515:

I would give it some time as the party may be undergoing some PR shifts and also provide reliable sources on this talk page that describe the Conservative Party as right-wing populist or populist to back up the inclusion of such a label in the infobox. It is one thing for their leader to be described

3484:

My understanding is that the ideology and position fields are supposed to represent a broader view of the party: the overall tendency of the party, as it has been over a several years/election cycles, and not simply the current leader's current preoccupations. Poillevre may have taken a more populist

2249:

party of politics that are right of centre, meaning differing ideologies are present within the party. These two for example are very differing ideologies and the party itself has never claimed to be fully in support of either of these, though there's strong support for both of these by party MPs and

1721:

For the purposes of the infobox I'd say they're pretty interchangeable. Right-libertarianism might be somewhat more accurate as it includes more radical types of libertarian rather than just a small segment of libertarian-leaning right-wingers. I would even be fine with just Libertarianism, since the

1215:

I agree. Federal parties in Canada are not fully integrated in provincial politics, with the exception of the NDP. The conservatives have no provincial affiliates; while the liberals don't have one in BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec and the NWT. Canada is not like the US where the GOP and democrats

1118:

The principles and policies section is a strange mess that talks more about the structure of the party than its beliefs. It reads more like an advertisement and is basically one big weasel word. Can someone address this, preferably rewriting the section as a whole? I think it should be similar to the

1091:

This whole thing (and, to be honest, most CanPoli articles from 1993-2006) is a giant mess: Partisan point scoring from 10 years ago, glib and repeated assessments of "vote splitting" with nothing to really back it up, and horserace banter. If anyone wants to work wtih me for a revamp, message me.

334:

I feel I am being civil. I haven't called you names or accused you of any of the things I would really like to. As for giving you offense, I don't care. I can't help if your level of sensitivity, which, if you are offended, is rather low. As for condescending, given your deficiencies in even managing

3080:

AIUI, the infobox is supposed to represent the broad outline of the party, so I'm very skeptical of adjusting the position (or ideology, for that matter) just due to the efforts of a single leader (on this page or on any other party); the party is a larger, broader thing than any one leader. O'Toole

3047:

Since Erin O'Toole became leader the party has taken many left-leaning positions that put the party at odds with its supporters and with the more right leaning half of Canada's electorate. These include: support for a carbon price, support for sex-selective abortion, support for further increases in

2244:

Wanted to create a discussion section on Factions in the infobar, since there doesn't seem to be a solid consensus, as the edit is removed without reason or discussion. Without a doubt in my mind, factions should be mentioned next to "Social conservatism" and "Right libertarianism." The Conservative

1682:

I believe the use is in reference to ideological factions, hence why it is under the 'ideology' section of the infobox. Wiktionary defines 'faction' as "A group of people, especially within a political organization, which expresses a shared belief or opinion different from people who are not part of

929:

I've updated the phrase, "formerly the Reform Party of Canada" to wording which is more historically accurate. The Reform Party was the driving force behind the United Alternative initiative, which was intended to unite like-minded Canadians into a political force capable of forming a government by

221:

On March 13, 2012 a committee of Conservative MPs agreed to give Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth a one hour hearing "sometime in April", and a second hour of debate "in late spring or early fall" for his proposal to create a special committee to examine the legal definition of when a fetus becomes

140:

That's what I meant to suggest. The paragraph states that a Justice Department official was of the opinion that the marriage was void. This does create the impression that this decision was motivated ideologically, while it was actually motivated by the legal principle of comity. I think it would be

1766:

The thing is these terms are being applied by journalists or other observers on an ad hoc basis, they aren't organic. If there was a self-identfied group of people within the CPC that called itself right-libertarian I'd be more willing to call that a faction but if it's just a term used by media to

1517:

Right now the page is locked because of an edit war over the ideology displayed in the infobox. I would like to find a consensus regarding the ideology of this party so we can get the page unlocked and allow people to constructively editing the rest of the page. I would say the core ideology of the

937:

Source? Me. I was there, and I was actively involved in the process. From the official launch of the United Alternative process in London, 1998 through to the eventual announcement of the Reform Party membership's voting to merge with the Canadian Alliance on March 27, 2000. I was in the room at

264:

First, so what if it is related to abortion? It is a private memebers bill, not a government bill. There is no evidence it is Conservative Party policy; it is Stephen Woodworth policy. This is an article about the party, not the MP. It is absurd to suggest that every bill sponsored by every private

79:

The article implies that the recent issue regarding gay divorce has anything to do at all with the conservative stance on same-sex marriage. This is incorrect as the recent issue didn't actually have anything to do with same-sex marriage, but with "tourism marriage" in general. If a particular type

3563:

We have no sources about the party just about this man who's been elected and hasn't put his party in any direction yet. We have to keep an eye on this as the media is saying two different things ...populist ...,,,,,vs the norm ..that will dominate the sources for a while until there's actually a

2999:

cover their subjects' histories much better, focusing on the broader trends and developments instead of minutiae. Which is not to say that the information here is completely pointless, but the play-by-play of the election campaign is probably better suited to the election in question's own article

1834:

We really have to start this conversation because the current page for the CPC is sorely lacking information on ideology and some of the info concerning the political position is inaccurate. Significant parts of t he CPC are much more right-wing than centre-right. Have any of you seen Brad Trost's

1740:

I know that news organizations such as the CBC have used that terminology before, be it correct or not. I do know that those are the ideologies that are represented within the party and many sources do confirm this. I would highly suggest that when editing the ideologies section on the page, those

1667:

Notwithstanding the (mis)use of the "factions" section in the US party pages, there are no formal factions in the Conservative party so listing "factions" is simply innaccurate - a faction has some level of organization, even if it's informal and outside of leadership races there really aren't any

1652:

I would agree generally, but I think it is important to clarify 'Conservatism in Canada' by using that as the hyperlink rather than the generic 'Conservatism' article, due to the huge differences in the nature of conservatism depending on country. Right-wing populism might be contentious with some

1458:

While factions of the Republican Party (United States) certainly embrace right-wing populism, right-libertarianism and social conservatism I disagree strongly that the Conservative Party of Canada embraces these values. The CPC is Stephen Harper and Stephen Harper is the CPC. Under his leadership

933:

While Preston Manning and the Reform Party leadership was driving the process, the resulting Canadian Alliance was a brand new political party in its own right. The Reform Party, effectively, merged with the Canadian Alliance in much the same was as the Canadian Alliance ended up merging with the

857:

All of the sources you've given date from before the last election. Since then the party has made dramatic changes in their policy owing to their majority status. A better argument could be made with more recent references. A more clear picture can be deduced after the CPC policy convention has

474:

Just because an individual Conservative MP introduces a bill does not mean that the bill reflects Conservative Party policy. The section you refer to is not about what various individual Conservatives believe about abortion. It is about the party's "policy and position" on abortion. Just because a

197:

The sections from "2006 general election" through "Third Harper Government" are far too detailed. This is an article about the party, so going into that much detail is hard to justify. There are certainly parts that should be here, but they should only be broad strokes, and details that have to do

3316:

It is to my knowledge that Knowledge tends to leave the vast majority of articles open for anyone to edit—even if those articles cover controversial subjects, like political parties. Only in certain cases, like a high volume of vandalism in a short period of time do editing restrictions come into

2356:

Listing "factions" under right libertarianism and social consetvativism is 100% incorrect. The party manifesto voted apon at every conservative convention has been very social conservative (ie, anti-euthanasia, anti-abortion or pro life however your stance, anti-marijuana, ect.) The platform also

2224:

1481:

Maxime Bernier is fairly explicitly libertarian, and he came very close to winning the leadership race. Numerous reliable sources have commented on the existence of a libertarian faction. There's also numerous reliable sources that identify a social conservative faction, inherited from the Reform

226:

This inaccurate and inconsequential. The fact is that the Subcommittee Private Members' Business of the Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs are both cross-party committees. It is also the fact that nothing odd happened here. Every time the list of private members' bills and

3733:

In several ways, Poilievre does not fit the mould of a new populist. For one, Poilievre is not new. He was a cabinet minister in the Stephen Harper government and he has been a member of Parliament for almost 20 years. For another, he is not your stereotypical reactionary. He is at ease with the

2523:

Canadian parties are Centrist by nature and this party is simply on the right side of center. Far-right politics has never been part of the main parties in Canada and in fact to win an election all parties need to align to the center. Canada is very unique in having Centrist parties.... they all

296:

Done. Since it wasn't a "committee of Conservative MPs", or even a committee with a Conservative majority, that part was wrong, and when edited down to the truth was distracting fluff. It is therefore removed. The only remotely relevant bit is that a Conservative MP will have a bill debated that

3003:

I would like to know what other editors think about the state of this page. I'm not expecting anyone to immediately jump into action and start drafting up entire new sections, but whether there'd be objections to me taking a machete to some of this (moving things if applicable), or maybe if the

1009:

This entire page needs a cleanup in my opinion. The polices, history, leadership, etc. of the Conservative Party of Canada, while SIMILAR, are completely separate and unrelated to the polices of the Government of Canada. The Government (which, granted, is led by the leader of the Conservative

1032:

page. Also, like you say there's two much overlap between the Conservative government and the actual party policies. And section about principles and policies needs to be completely re-done. The section presently lists government policies, not the party principles as found in its constitution.

752:

The redirect does look too biased without some kind of reference on this page. My guess is that when I made it seven years ago there was some meme in the media that used the name "Regressive Conservative" in reference to this party often enough to make the redirect useful for people who didn't

786:

Actually, review, we don't need a separate analysis, the history of the party including its policies and most of its leadership comes from the Reform party, which is clearly Right-wing and stated their page. Its pretty clear that there has been some partisan adjustments to the CPC page here,

80:

of marriage is illegal in a couple's country of residence, then even if they are allowed to marry in Canada that marriage will not be upheld by the Canadian courts. This is not particular to same-sex marriage. For example the U.S. does not allow first-cousin marriage, while Canada does. If a

2507:

The source says that broadly speaking, the party is right-wing, and that one of the predecessor parties (the Progressive Conservatives) were center-right. The other predecessor - the Reform Party/Canadian Alliance was described as extreme right. So to say the Conservatives "Center-Right to

251:

This bill is directly related to abortion, and is a proposal to open up debate on the issue. As noted directly above this in the article, Prime Minister Harper has previously promised not to open debate on the issue. The fact that the bill was brought forwards by a Conservative MP makes it

1873:

This source talks about the social conservative candidates getting strong support from the membership. These are the core ideologies of the CPC and the sources to prove it. If anyone wants to add sources then that is ok. This is just a start to get us on the path to agreeing on ideologies

3337:

The conservatives are more fiscally conservative and liberal + the conservatives and a large centrist and sociallly liberal faction and have a socially conservative that’s not as big as the centrist/liberal factions but I’d still add it given it’s still large and has influence within the

2192:

Perhaps it shouldn't be, it's certainly not used in that sense in the UK party pages which Canadian parties are more closely patterned after (American party's are structured completely unlike parties in either the UK or Canada). Factions is the wrong word (at least in the formal sense).

901:

but was reverted asking to take it to talk (but as we can see above, taking it to talk didnt go very far). I provided a number of sources (mostly books by experts) and proposed a compromise solution of "centre-right to right-wing". Is anyone against a compromise solution? Relying only on

413:

As previously noted, equating this bill (which is specifically on the topic of abortion) with "every bill" (which may be relevant to a specific subsection or not) is a fallacy of equivocation. The discussion is not about "all bills" or "every other bill", it is about whether or not

2815:

Of course, the CPC may be conservative in some matters, including the death penalty. Unlike the UK Conservative Party, however, the CPC has little nationalistic inclination and is more liberal than the UK Conservative Party in various cultural issues such as multiculturalism and

2725:

According to increasing news sources. Andrew Scheer resigned as party leader on December 12, 2019 effective immediately. The party caucus (who due to the leadership being rendered vacant) had to chose an interim leader. It chose Scheer. Therefore, should we now have him shown as

1200:

An unregistered editor is trying to add bars to indicate that this federal political party controls no provinicial governments. We don't need to state the obvious. It doesn't belong here. Feel free to discuss, but let's leave it out unless there is a consensus here to add it.

3664:

Trying to demonize Poilievre as a "populist" or as Canada's Trump, or implying that he is a white supremacist or opposed to women's rights is unlikely to succeed. He is pro-choice, pro-immigration and has forcefully denounced white replacement theory and all of "that kind of

235:

There is no reason why the fact that this private member's bill has been introduced or is expected to be debated in April should be in the article. This is article is for information about the party, not a depository for every factlet that pertains to a member of the party.

198:

with the party itself. Aside from pushing this article beyond what it is supposed to be, the extra detail invites additions for ever scandal or press announcement that catches some editor's attention. Can anyone justify keeping the level of detail that is currently there? -

2589:

Domination by the Centre The central anomaly of the Canadian system, and the primary cause of its other peculiarities, has been its historical domination by a party of the centre. In none of the other countries is a centre party even a major player, much less the

2981:

This section is extremely unbalanced— not in terms of tone, but in terms of emphasis and coverage. The section makes sure to mention every development and comment that happened during an election, and even touches on party conventions, but devotes exactly

1570:

is a core Conservative Party ideology. There are certainly monarchists in the CPC but there are republicans as well. Harper was more of a monarchist than previous Tory leaders (at least since Diefenbaker) but I wouldn't call it central to CPC's programme.

3687:

He has been compared to former President Donald Trump for his populist overtures, but in terms of substance, he has largely confined himself to pocketbook issues. He is pro-immigration — his wife is a Venezuelan immigrant — and now calls himself

787:

including the request that it be reviewed as a talking point, where someone can prevent the change from being seen. The Progressive Conservatives there were centre-right are still around, but the CPC was too far right for them. Read the history.

2508:

Right-Wing" gives a misleading view that the party tends to be more moderate. I would say a more accurate way of describing the party would be something like "Big-Tent of the Right" or "Center-Right to Far-Right", or just simply "Right-Wing".

475:

bill is written by a Conservative, it does not mean that the bill is a Conservative Party bill. Mr. Woodworth's bill tells us not a damned thing about Conservative policy; it only tells us what he thinks. Why is this concept so hard for you? -

314:

No, it has improved the inaccurate passage you added. It is still not relevant to the article. The point of the section is to discuss the "policies and positions" of the Conservative Party; not the particular positions of individual members.

3048:

immigration levels and support for unionization. These positions make it clear that the party is in no significant way "right-wing", even if it once was. Unless anyone has any opposition, I will change the party position to "centre right".--

3758:

But he is no Donald Trump in tenets or temperament. He doesn't echo the anti-immigrant rhetoric, and abhors Mr. Trump's gargantuan deficits. He is so calculated that he could never be the erratic bundle of impulses that rambles at a Trump

2417:

Someone has evidently vandalised this page so that when it is linked in Facebook (and perhaps other social media) Nazi regalia appears. As I do not know how to remove this offensive and juvenile image, I ask that someone else will do so.

1550:

and whatever else anyone else suggests. There are reliable sources to back up all of these claims, but I would be more than willing to bring some up if there are others disputing my suggestions. What approach do you think should be

2925:: The current setup is a fact agreed upon by the sources cited. If you are confused, you may click on those links (called citations) next to where the party is described as "centre-right to right-wing"; they will explain. 394:

Dont see how this is notable for this overview party page - not a party bill - its a private member's bill ...not by the party so need to mention it here..we dont mention every bill especially those that have not passed.

2986:

words to the actual Harper government. Anyone who reads this page is going to come away with a deep understanding of how the party acted and fared during election season, but nothing about how they acted and fared

1957: 906:. It seems clear to me that at the very least, reliable mainstream sources as well as authors consider them centre-right, and while anecdotal they were always called centre-right by professors in my experience. -- 2480:

Over last several weeks we witnessed fight over SNC criminal matters and prime minister showing one finger salute to everybody. Why nobody asked about any investments our leader on parliament hill has with SNC?

117:

I don't see much of an issue with how it's currently worded in the article. The Conservative Party didn't have anything to do with the story, but it was indeed in the news thanks to a complete fabrication by

717:

The redirect has existed since 2006, so I am not willing to speedy delete it. Also, lack of neutrality is not necessarily a reason to delete a redirect, though this one is obviously used in a POV context.

495:

Is not a party bill - this page is about the overall Conservative parties position - not what some lone member is doing. Also this is more of a developing news story then something encyclopedic yet - see

335:

to read your source without your own biases flat out changing what it says before it reaches your conscious mind, and given your extraordinary behaviour at my talk page, you may need to be condescended to. -

2273:

The Progressive Conservative Party, similar to the Liberal Party, contained various shades of opinion, and its policies were generally determined by local issues and practical need rather than by ideology

2551:...most Canadian governments, especially at the federal level, have taken a moderate, centrist approach to decision making, seeking to balance growth, stability, and governmental efficiency and economy... 1444:

It would always depend on sourcing, but given the long-known existence of terms like "Red Tories", I would say such would be appropriate. The biggest issue would, of course, be finding neutral sources.

547:, but even then, nothing more than a sentence, which inevitably will read: "Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth initiated a debate on when a fetus becomes a person, which was then quickly forgotten about." 542:

This private members bill deserves no more coverage in this article (or hell, even those about the current government and parliament) than any other private member's bill. It might warrant a mention at

3101:

Hi all, we're seeing a lot of edits being made to the ideology section in the infobox. Rather than play this game of one person adding and another removing, let's discuss in talk. I've restored in to:

2357:

advocates for libertarians ideals, such as lower taxes and reduced public spending (especially prominent now and durring the Harper administration). so to say there are "factions" is entirely incorrect

2225:

advocates for libertarians ideals, such as lower taxes and reduced public spending (especially prominent now and durring the Harper administration), so to say it's all "factions" is entirely incorrect.

738:, which suggests a non-nuterual title should be backed up with sources. But the user who created it is still very active, I'm interested in seeing what he has to say, before nominating it for deletion. 3700: 460:

The article is about a Conservative MP's bill advocating abortion debate, and appears in the section on the Conservative Party's stance and actions on Abortion. Please explain how this is not notable.

2845:. But as seen above we have many many academic sources that delve into details on a Canadian scale from left to right. If you have new academic sources (not a news story) we can reopen the debate.-- 3301: 3270: 88:]) I therefore think that mentioning the issue under a section dealing with the conservative's view on same-sex marriage creates the misimpression that the issue was an ideologically driven one. 3027:

Most of the stuff in that section doesn't seem to relate to the modern day, 2003 CPC. Would support a new article titled "History of Canadian conservative parties" or something to that effect.

753:

understand the joke. However, that's not an issue anymore, so I'll speedy delete as an unsourced attack page. If someone comes here with a good reason why it should exist, I'll re-create it. —

84:

first-cousins couple who lived in the U.S. was married in Canada, then that marriage wold be considered void in Canada as the marriage was not legal in the couple's country of residence. (See

3149:

as factions. It is evident that these two competing factions exist in the CPC, including in caucus, in leadership elections, at policy conventions, among party members and supporters.--

2957: 2667:

I talked to Ahunt about this the other day and he told me it was relevant to this page. But, I'm not sure if you guys agree with me thinking it may qualify as news? What do you think?

2054: 583:

NO to the addition ofthe proposed text. It is way to specfic for this article. Given it is an IP address and also seems to pretty clearly have some POV it is a definite no in my view.

2074: 1641:, as seen with many of the other candidates for the leadership. The party must be labeled centre-right to right-wing due to the fact that the party encompasses these two factions. 2775:

Canada's politics and culture are known to be liberal. This, of course, may be my subjective view, but in South Korea, Canada is known for its progressive tendency among the West.

1958:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150622041735/http://www.conservative.ca/media/2013/05/Rules-for-Constitution-and-Policy-Discussions-Conservative-Party-of-Canada-2013-Convention.pdf

1870: 702:

It does not matter to me one way or another but obviously someone needs to do something about that redirection in order to remove any hints of political bias against this party.

1482:

Party and nowadays generally associated with Brad Trost. I agree with Hebhom that a factions subheading is appropriate as these ideologies are not central to the party itself.--

2371:

Maxime Bernier even said he was willing to reopen the abortion debate in Canada, something even Sheer, a right winger with about a 15 year record, said he wouldn't even do.

177:

I've removed the 'alleged electoral fraud' from the lead. Please gain consensus if it is to be re-posted. There is sufficient coverage in the section below on this subject.

2084: 861:

As for the NDP it would seem to be a good time to revisit their position as listed on their page as they are currently going through a policy convention. I do think that

783:

They may want us to believe they are centre-right, but that is not the case. Can we get a non partisan definition based on policy as a guide to the correct terminology?

1961: 1138:

The lead was short and rather clunky, so the lead has been heavily expanded. Hopefully the "this lead section needs expansion" notice can be deleted in due time. Thanks!

1869:

this source talks about Maxime Bernier being a libertarian. He himself even describes himself as a moderate libertarian. I would put this down as right-libertarianism.

1848:

I agree expansion is needed....but we cant make our own conclusions on perceived positions. We need to regurgitate what reliable sources say....no original research.--

227:

motions to be debated by the Commons is replenished, i.e., when all the old ones have been debated, the subcommittee determines whether any of the bills are nonvotable.

3063:

I object... current contemporary sources still labeled it this way in the Canadian political spectrum. Is there a source? Being a Big Ten party is the norm in Canada.

953:

Scbritton: I agree with your edit, but you should be clear that you and your personal experiences do not qualify as a reliable source for encyclopedia articles. (See

331:

ADDITIONAL: Please try and remain civil in your discussion about the article. Your language here is bordering on the offensive, and is at the least condescending.

1355: 1351: 1337: 865:

is not very accurate, but I'm sure all can be sorted out once more clear policies are made public. It's tough to have living articles be correct all of the time!

974:

I don't think the change I made is significant enough to warrant providing a source, since all it does is add a bit of clarity towards what actually happened.

3385:

Multiple news sources such as CBC, CityNews, etc. have said that the CPC is now a right-wing populist party; we should add that to the infobox in my opinion.

2671: 2739: 2682: 3005: 1820:

The page is locked as we are waiting for you guys to come up with some sort of verification here in the talk page and come to a consensus on what to add.--

1497:

I completely agree with the idea that the CPC as a whole does not embrace libertarianism and right-wing populism. I support forming a "Factions" headline.

59: 790:

I dont have tie for a lot right now, but I encourage anyone else to provide sources as well. Here is one that puts the CPC tot he right of centre-right:

3602: 3530:

In the event that opinion articles do describe them as such in the future, it's important that we adhere to the policy of not stating opinions as fact.

3709:

And second, what parts of his program—which, to be fair to him, he is pro-immigration, pro-same-sex marriage, and pro-choice—do you take exception to?

2678: 2055:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150915101909/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/decisioncanada/story.html?id=d59c723e-e997-4569-b9ea-20e2dc0d5686

2557: 2075:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130307233007/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/editorial/story.html?id=7ae0209d-dfbf-4725-ad70-7175308efc93

1937: 3782:

His rhetorical style evokes populists such as Donald Trump. But his enemies list is more circumscribed. Unlike Mr Trump, he favours immigration.

3294:

shouldn't this be at least kind of protected? I felt like vandalizing this page but I've learned self control and I've found peace in my soul

3009: 1871:

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2017/05/29/social-conservative-candidates-got-strong-support-from-toronto-suburbs-leadership-data-says.html

814: 3747: 3353:

The Conservatives are so "liberal" and "centrist" that, in the recent leadership election, they overwhelmingly voted for social conservative

2606: 2582: 2544: 2333: 2312: 2291: 2058: 703: 673: 1947: 2768:

I think the CPC's position should be written as a simple 'centre-right' rather than 'centre-right to right-wing' on the following grounds.

2488: 3771: 2078: 2088: 1013:

Perhaps this page can be reduced and we can create a separate page to the effect of “Canadian Governance under Stephen Harper”? Thoughts?

311:

I appreciate the edit to the wording in the sentence. This constructive action on your part has improved the information in the article.

3701:"Is there room for centrists in the current Conservative Party?: Tasha Kheiriddin on the right path forward for Conservatives in Canada" 2085:

https://archive.is/20130411104002/http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/10/19/ship-building-contract-is-an-iceberg-waiting-to-be-hit/

1466: 884: 3305: 3274: 1962:

http://www.conservative.ca/media/2013/05/Rules-for-Constitution-and-Policy-Discussions-Conservative-Party-of-Canada-2013-Convention.pdf

245: 2941: 2686: 763: 461: 431: 265:

member that wins the lucky dip to be debated should be added at its party's article. The fact of this article's debate is relevant at

2778:

Many of the right-wing to far-right figures in the CPC have moved to the PPC or appear to be unable to speak out loud within the CPC.

2064: 1173:. The lead needs more work to reflect this fact. Lately, it's been erroneously made to appear as though the party only succeeded the 2094:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1977:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

47: 17: 2269:

As mentioned before.....no thanks. In Canada the term "Factions" has a different meaning then the USA....we have regional groups -

1967: 2821: 2806: 2791: 2433: 2251: 2175: 2171: 1539: 1422: 1418: 1119:

pages on the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois; a simple list that is a more neutral version of what the parties say on their websites.

2451: 1888:

I see the article is sourced to off ed news articles....just horrible ....will search for scholarly publication this weekend.--

990: 2198: 2160: 1772: 1673: 1576: 156: 103: 85: 2672:

https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/2019/10/10/scheer-campaign-faces-leadership-speculation-as-election-day-nears.html

2683:

https://www.nationalnewswatch.com/2019/10/11/despite-leadership-questions-scheer-says-conservatives-are-united-behind-him/

2254:

separates and notes the ideological factions of party members in the infobox as to not generalize/oversimplify the party.

3678: 3441:

Yep I agree with Moxy (although the reply could have been better without inserting personal political opinions). We need

2284:

Constitutional Politics and the Territorial Question in Canada and the United Kingdom: Federalism and Devolution Compared

819: 3521: 3390: 3322: 3183:

Will wait a day or two before removing media crap as sources. Will try to fine academic sources....but not looking good.

2880: 2136: 2038: 2019: 1911: 1398: 1259: 1231: 231: 3628: 1865:

this source talks about the free enterprise (Fiscal conservatism, economic liberalism) part of the conservative party.

2930: 2817: 2802: 2787: 1722:

popular definition of that in Canada is roughly the same as in the United States (right/free market libertarianism).--

1190: 1143: 3722: 2524:

support our social Society just differ on how to implement it. For a basic overview with more sources pls refer to

1927: 2679:

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-despite-leadership-questions-scheer-says-conservatives-are-united/

2513: 954: 129: 38: 2194: 2156: 1768: 1669: 1572: 1567: 1535: 848: 707: 677: 588: 572: 3416:

policies or liberals will be here for another decade....simply can't win if you don't get central Canada's vote.

1354:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2906: 1938:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150622040855/http://www.conservative.ca/media/2012/06/Sept2011-Constitution-E.pdf

1704: 1622: 3357:

as their next leader and (statistically) humiliated his closest competitor, lukewarm Progressive Conservative

2492: 1038: 883:

I don't think that it is correct to describe the party as right wing. Its policies are decidedly centre-right.

1470: 3653: 3553: 3517: 3504: 3386: 3361:. " have a socially conservative that's not as big as the centrist/liberal factions..." – give me a break. 3318: 2992: 2876: 2753: 2272: 2127: 2046: 2010: 1919: 1414: 1413:

Would anyone support an internal factions subheading in the ideology part of the infobox, like the articles

1389: 1275: 1267: 888: 815:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/27/world/leadership-struggle-inside-canada-s-governing-party-intensifies.html

522: 2509: 230:

This particular bill happened to be in the latest tranche of 15 bills and motions determined to be votable.

3166:

Factions? ?? WHAT source do we have? As per the norm campaign season brings out big tent promises by all.

3108: 2926: 2902: 2710: 2695: 2429: 2376: 2362: 2230: 2059:

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/decisioncanada/story.html?id=d59c723e-e997-4569-b9ea-20e2dc0d5686

1523: 1519: 1150: 1139: 1124: 1029: 759: 497: 465: 435: 1948:

https://web.archive.org/web/20141025175614/http://www.conservative.ca/media/2014/10/october-nc-report.pdf

2748:, I would put a rfc on the 44th Canadian election page, since that's where the discussion is happening. 2111:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1994:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1373:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1361: 1239: 1206: 962: 800: 123: 3576: 3557: 3525: 3508: 3494: 3475: 3458: 3432: 3394: 3374: 3347: 3326: 3309: 3278: 3258: 3244: 3225: 3195: 3178: 3158: 3136: 3090: 3075: 3057: 3036: 3021: 2971: 2934: 2910: 2854: 2825: 2810: 2795: 2757: 2714: 2699: 2653: 2517: 2496: 2470: 2437: 2407: 2380: 2372: 2366: 2358: 2350: 2263: 2234: 2226: 2219: 2202: 2187: 2164: 2141: 2079:

http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/editorial/story.html?id=7ae0209d-dfbf-4725-ad70-7175308efc93

2045:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2024: 1941: 1918:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1897: 1866: 1857: 1829: 1815: 1799: 1776: 1761: 1731: 1716: 1692: 1677: 1662: 1594: 1580: 1560: 1506: 1491: 1474: 1452: 1438: 1403: 1266:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1242: 1225: 1209: 1147: 1128: 1101: 1074: 1060: 1042: 1022: 994: 965: 947: 919: 892: 877: 852: 804: 768: 747: 729: 711: 696: 681: 655: 638: 618: 592: 576: 554: 508: 484: 469: 455: 439: 404: 359:

Request For Comment: (Re: Conservative Party Of Canada: Abortion) Does disputed text meet criteria for

344: 324: 306: 278: 207: 187: 164: 135: 111: 3540:

If opinion articles describe them as populist after more than a single leadership cycle, we could add

2089:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/10/19/ship-building-contract-is-an-iceberg-waiting-to-be-hit/

3454: 3297: 3266: 3154: 3150: 3112: 3053: 3049: 2996: 2960:

until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2484: 2425: 2421: 2391: 1879: 1875: 1840: 1836: 1746: 1742: 1700: 1646: 1642: 1626: 1462: 1328: 978: 844: 830: 669:

Apart from the statement of its redirection, there is no use of the word regressive in this article.

613: 584: 568: 257:

Also, please note that the fact that I am editing from my IP address is irrelevant to the discussion.

2179: 1807: 1753: 1723: 1684: 1654: 1586: 1552: 1483: 1430: 982: 939: 3142: 3132: 3116: 3032: 2687:

https://www.macleans.ca/politics/for-the-tories-peter-mackay-is-more-than-just-a-face-in-the-crowd/

2403: 2183: 1811: 1757: 1727: 1688: 1658: 1630: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1590: 1556: 1543: 1531: 1527: 1487: 1434: 1066: 1052: 1034: 1014: 986: 943: 743: 651: 634: 3339: 2953: 2065:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150805014915/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/prime-minister/charles-joseph-clark

897:

This conversation seems to be leaning towards centre-right consensus. I tried to make a bold edit

672:

Does this mean that it is the view of the Knowledge community that this party is a regressive one?

3752: 3549: 3500: 2842: 2749: 2525: 2465: 1951: 1498: 1449: 1301: 1287: 1070: 1056: 1018: 735: 726: 551: 544: 185: 150: 97: 2619:

Ambrose, Emma; Mudde, Cas (2015). "Canadian Multiculturalism and the Absence of the Far Right".

1968:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090212003018/http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/pressrelease.cfm?id=2857

1358:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

228: 2112: 1995: 1374: 3343: 3254: 3221: 3146: 2772:

Unlike Britain's Conservative Party, the CPC has little or no national conservative character.

2735: 2706: 2691: 2603: 2597: 2579: 2573: 2541: 2394:'. I have tried finding just one and have been unable to do so. I suggest we replace it with ' 2330: 2309: 2288: 2282: 2259: 2152: 1787: 1426: 1221: 1186: 1120: 914: 824: 754: 266: 2535: 2324: 938:

the announcement myself, so my source material is my own personal experience of being there.

3490: 3354: 3240: 3086: 3017: 2628: 2566:

First Past the Post in Canada has favoured broadly-based, accommodative, centrist parties...

2303: 1502: 1235: 1202: 1097: 958: 903: 796: 3603:"Pierre Poilievre is the latest iteration in the long history of 'Made in Canada' populism" 2119: 2002: 1381: 3727: 3548:. The latter would require numerous scholarly book sources, rather than opinion articles. 3446: 2068: 1712: 692: 626: 607: 603: 514: 480: 340: 320: 302: 274: 241: 203: 3542:"several journalists have described the Conservative Party of Canada as a populist party" 1971: 446:

Sorry i was not clear - this bill here is not notable in the least bit for this article.

3572: 3471: 3428: 3333:

Fiscal conservatism and centrism, social conservatism and social liberalism as factions

3231:

Looks like there's a template in place to just pull text directly from O'Toole's page:

3191: 3174: 3128: 3071: 3028: 2847: 2646: 2399: 2395: 2346: 2215: 1893: 1853: 1825: 1795: 1547: 1340:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 872: 739: 647: 630: 504: 451: 400: 2801:

As for classifying CPC as right-wing, we will write some footnotes in this document. -

2118:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2001:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1380:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

820:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/25/opposition-parties-topple-canadian-government/

666:

When I typed in Regressive Conservative Party of Canada it redirects to this article.

3776: 3658: 3370: 3213: 2964: 2460: 1446: 723: 719: 625:

No to addition of proposed text. Per comments of Resolute & others, violation of

548: 518: 178: 144: 91: 1862: 602:- whatever I may think of the Conservative Reform Alliance Party, this is clearly a 3358: 3250: 3217: 3105: 2838: 2745: 2731: 2255: 1634: 1602: 1217: 1182: 908: 2632: 1526:. I would say some other core ideas of the party that are worthy of inclusion are 791: 521:

argument that the opinion of a single MP reflects party policy. Should we put on

2537:

Thinking Government: Public Administration and Politics in Canada, Fourth Edition

1928:

https://web.archive.org/web/20141006100303/http://www.conservative.ca/?page_id=37

3486: 3236: 3082: 3013: 1347: 1093: 862: 834: 829:

Numerous sources above. Why is this even being debated? Funny how the SOCIALIST

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2637:

The far right has never been a prominent force in Canadian politics or society.

1708: 1638: 1346:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1307: 1293: 688: 525:

that Quebec independence is their policy because of Justin Trudeau's comments?

476: 336: 316: 298: 270: 237: 199: 2674: 1542:, which would include ideologies held by sub-groups within the party such as 3566: 3465: 3422: 3185: 3168: 3065: 2342: 2211: 1889: 1849: 1821: 1791: 1429:? There are obviously some people with differing ideas within this party. -- 838: 500: 447: 396: 285:

ADDITIONAL: If you feel the sentence added to the article misrepresents the

3499:

Agreed, changing their description after every new leader seems irregular.

2503:

Source indicating "Center-Right" actually describes the party as Right-Wing

2305:

Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party’s Long Mastery of Canada’s Public Life

3235:. I've removed it, because that's really not the way to duplicate text. — 3463:

Simply say what is factual about our " brokerage politics" we have here.

3413: 3363: 2782:

We never describe Germany's CDU or UK Conservative Party as 'right-wing'.

2326:

The Blueprint: Conservative Parties and their Impact on Canadian Politics

2246: 1931: 1276:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140701142810/http://www.idu.org/member.aspx

2948: 293:

source, please feel free to contribute to the wording of the sentence.

2106:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

1989:

An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

3629:"Conservative frontrunner deploys populist strike on Ottawa's elites" 3445:

sources, as they are the ones that know Canadian politics very well.

2958:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 13#Conservateur

2613:

Stephen Harper's centre-right Conservative Party won reelection on...

2151:

Whoever listed factions in the CPC is incorrect. These aren't actual

297:

seeks to create a committee regarding the definition of human life. -

1942:

http://www.conservative.ca/media/2012/06/Sept2011-Constitution-E.pdf

1867:

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/opinion/breakfast-with-bernier-1.3931417

2720: 2685:

And finally there is this as the final development to the story :

2450: 2448:

Hi! Please help identify MPs in this picture and add Categories:

1279: 3734:

non-traditional family, he is pro-choice, he is pro-immigration.

3233:{{#section-h:Erin O'Toole|Leadership of the Conservative Party}} 1741:

ideologies are represented since the CPC is a "big tent" party.

1767:

try to describe different ideological tendencies then less so.

517:

to a topic. This article is about the political party. Also,

2864: 2681:

This also references the development in the paywalled article

1952:

http://www.conservative.ca/media/2014/10/october-nc-report.pdf

25: 1617:

are the core ideologies of the party. Factions would include

722:

would be the ideal venue if someone wishes to take it there.

2721:

Scheer's status. No longer party leader, now interim leader.

2677:

This one is paywalled but it's a development to the story :

1806:

The page is locked, so no one can add or restore material.--

1313:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

902:

post-election sources as Zippanova suggested may fall under

3748:"The making of Pierre Poilievre, conservative proselytizer" 1637:, as seen with Michael Chong, while the old Reform wing is 825:

http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCATRE4910JE20081002

2837:(ec5) Not sure where to being with non comparable parties 2670:

We had this information that came out from CPC insiders :

2320:.....that seen they have been doing much bettter recently 2049:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1922:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1270:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

3772:"Canada's Conservatives pick a brainy brawler as leader" 2841:. First agree centerist parties ...as i have written at 1216:

run from the white house to every state legislature. --

1028:

I agree. A lot of the historical stuff should be in the

2575:

Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics

2069:

http://pm.gc.ca/eng/prime-minister/charles-joseph-clark

2042: 1915: 1263: 898: 3546:"the Conservative Party of Canada is a populist party" 2977:

Proposed split and cutting down of the History section

2952:

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

1972:

http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/pressrelease.cfm?id=2857

3679:"The quick take on Canada's new Conservative leader" 1585:

That is fair, I would be fine with leaving it off.--

1538:. I would then go with a Factions subheading, as on 687:

No, it means someone thought they were being funny.

3004:entire section should be split off to a standalone 1350:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1230:Thanks, Kndimov. I have also raised this issue at 1161:Made a few tweaks to point out that the party has 2413:Facebook preview of this Wiki page is a Nazi logo 2390:There are currently no sources for the ideology ' 1863:http://www.conservative.ca/our-party/our-history/ 1683:the group" and that's certainly the case here. -- 858:passed and the upcoming throne speech is tabled. 3564:party political position and academic analysis. 2558:"Plurality-Majority Electoral Systems: A Review" 2271:The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica say.... ( 1114:Principles and policies section is uninformative 792:http://www.thecanadaguide.com/political-parties 3601:Drache, Daniel; Froese, Marc (July 29, 2022). 2901:"centre-right to right wing" to "centre-left" 1336:This message was posted before February 2018. 2861:Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2020 1752:As the party ideology or as factions of it?-- 217:An IP editor is trying to add the following: 212: 8: 3654:"NP View: The unstoppable Pierre Poilievre" 3006:History of the Conservative Party of Canada 2572:Amanda Bittner; Royce Koop (1 March 2013). 1653:but I have no issue with that personally.-- 1308:https://wayback.archive-it.org/227/*/http:/ 1294:https://wayback.archive-it.org/227/*/http:/ 3295: 3264: 2675:https://apple.news/AcoCPYFY3Spah3gxl7IGfzA 2540:. University of Toronto Press. pp. 13–23. 2482: 2419: 2398:' as there are plenty of sources for it. - 1522:, which would be placed in the infobox as 1460: 1258:I have just modified one external link on 934:Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. 3212:, I get transferred over to a section in 2602:. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. p. 379. 2037:I have just modified 4 external links on 1910:I have just modified 5 external links on 1703:is a more appropriate to use rather than 1065:And hearing none I've taken care of this 779:Why is this party listed as centre-right? 646:. Resolute's analysis looks quite right. 213:Woodworth's abortion private members bill 3723:"Pierre Poilievre, populist politician?" 1051:Any other comments before this is done? 513:Agreed. Blatant case of trying to give 3593: 3302:2604:3D09:1580:9600:690E:CB96:9F2E:9816 3271:2604:3D09:1580:9600:5815:249F:7909:D5EB 2596:Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (2009). 1167:Conservatives/Progressive Conservatives 662:Regressive Conservative Party of Canada 3531: 3232: 3010:History of the Liberal Party of Canada 2329:. University of Toronto Press. p. 11. 2299:As for the big tent party best review 2281:Michael Keating; Guy Laforest (2017). 1932:http://www.conservative.ca/?page_id=37 1175:Conservative/Progressive Conservatives 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3746:Campbell, Clark (16 September 2022). 1325:to let others know (documentation at 925:"Formerly the Reform Party of Canada" 7: 3677:Forrest, Maura (12 September 2022). 2843:Politics of Canada#Political culture 2526:Politics of Canada#Political culture 3721:McConkey, David (23 October 2022). 3208:Why is it, when I go to 'edit' the 2323:J.P. Lewis; Joanna Everitt (2017). 24: 3627:Blatchford, Andy (May 25, 2022). 2041:. Please take a moment to review 1914:. Please take a moment to review 1262:. Please take a moment to review 18:Talk:Conservative Party of Canada 3571: 3470: 3427: 3403: 3190: 3173: 3070: 3000:rather than here, for instance. 2947: 2916: 2868: 2599:Britannica Book of the Year 2009 2252:Republican Party (United States) 2176:Democratic Party (United States) 2172:Republican Party (United States) 2097: 1980: 1540:Republican Party (United States) 1423:Democratic Party (United States) 1419:Republican Party (United States) 606:violation, and inappropriate. -- 600:Clearly should not be in article 29: 3534:Avoid stating opinions as facts 3127:content, what needs to change? 2956:. The discussion will occur at 2621:Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 1157:Intro: The party's predecessors 3558:19:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC) 3526:00:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 3509:19:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC) 3495:16:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC) 3476:23:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 3459:23:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 3433:22:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 3395:22:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC) 3327:00:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC) 2972:17:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 2381:00:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC) 2367:00:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC) 2351:15:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 2264:18:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC) 2235:15:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 1280:http://www.idu.org/member.aspx 1191:03:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC) 878:19:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC) 1: 3279:00:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 3037:07:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 2758:16:54, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 2740:16:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 2633:10.1080/13537113.2015.1032033 2408:03:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC) 2142:19:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC) 1475:00:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC) 1453:14:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1439:13:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 1404:22:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC) 1243:00:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC) 1226:21:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1210:21:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1181:, has been nearly neglected. 1075:21:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC) 1061:15:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC) 853:06:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC) 3577:02:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC) 3022:17:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC) 2881:Conservative Party of Canada 2715:13:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC) 2700:14:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 2438:06:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 2039:Conservative Party of Canada 1912:Conservative Party of Canada 1749:) 13:17, 14 June 2017 (EST) 1649:) 13:00, 14 June 2017 (EST) 1409:Internal factions - ideology 1260:Conservative Party of Canada 1232:Talk:Liberal Party of Canada 1156: 1153:16 May 2015 (5:40 pm) (EST) 1102:21:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 1043:16:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC) 1023:13:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC) 930:eliminating vote-splitting. 371:. 00:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 165:08:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 136:06:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 112:06:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 3375:05:55, 7 October 2022 (UTC) 3348:22:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC) 3310:03:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC) 3259:13:16, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 3245:05:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 3226:02:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 2935:12:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 2911:04:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC) 2895:to reactivate your request. 2883:has been answered. Set the 2025:09:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC) 1882:) 18:52, 21 June 2017 (EST) 1843:) 17:10, 21 June 2017 (EST) 1699:I'd like to object and say 173:Electoral Fraud in the lead 3802: 3196:22:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3179:02:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3159:00:36, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3137:03:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 3091:16:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3076:01:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 3058:00:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC) 2497:20:10, 13 April 2019 (UTC) 2455:Conservative Party in 2018 2034:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1907:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1367:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1255:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 893:05:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC) 656:22:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 639:17:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC) 619:18:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC) 593:22:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC) 577:08:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC) 555:13:22, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 509:01:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 485:04:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 470:00:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 456:00:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 440:00:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 405:00:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 345:01:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 325:01:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 307:00:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 279:00:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 246:00:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 208:00:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 2940:"Conservateur" listed at 2855:06:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 2826:05:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 2811:05:37, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 2796:05:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 2654:00:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC) 2518:23:11, 26 June 2019 (UTC) 2302:R. Kenneth Carty (2015). 2220:19:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 2203:16:53, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 2188:15:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 1898:19:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC) 1858:21:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC) 1830:18:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC) 1816:14:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC) 1800:12:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC) 1777:01:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC) 1762:22:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 1732:22:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 1717:11:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 1693:22:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 1678:17:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 1663:22:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 1595:22:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC) 1581:16:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 1568:constitutional monarchism 1561:15:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 1536:Constitutional monarchism 1492:15:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC) 1129:03:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC) 995:13:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC) 805:15:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 188:22:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 3043:The CPC as centre-right. 2942:Redirects for discussion 2660:Should this be included? 2170:That's how it's done on 2165:10:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC) 1705:libertarian conservative 1623:Libertarian conservatism 1507:05:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC) 1179:Reform/Canadian Alliance 1171:Reform/Canadian Alliance 1148:21:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC) 966:09:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 948:03:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 920:06:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC) 769:05:41, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 748:03:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 730:14:05, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 720:Redirects for discussion 712:07:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 697:06:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 682:06:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC) 3263:banana. smoothie. ez. 2993:Liberal Party of Canada 2471:03:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 2030:External links modified 1903:External links modified 1415:Conservative Party (UK) 1251:External links modified 1005:Page cleanup suggestion 523:Liberal Party of Canada 3381:“Right-wing populism”. 2534:David Johnson (2016). 2456: 1707:. My two cents though 1520:Conservatism in Canada 1196:Provincial governments 1030:Conservatism in Canada 224: 3780:. 15 September 2022. 2578:. UBC Press. p. 300. 2454: 2245:Party in Canada is a 219: 42:of past discussions. 3113:Liberal conservatism 2997:New Democratic Party 2392:right-libertarianism 2287:. Springer. p. 144. 2240:Ideological Factions 2195:Hungarian Phrasebook 2157:Hungarian Phrasebook 1769:Hungarian Phrasebook 1701:right-libertarianism 1670:Hungarian Phrasebook 1668:organized factions. 1627:Liberal conservatism 1573:Hungarian Phrasebook 1348:regular verification 831:New Democratic Party 3143:social conservatism 3117:Economic liberalism 1631:Right-wing populism 1619:Social conservatism 1615:Economic liberalism 1611:Canadian federalism 1607:Fiscal conservatism 1544:Social conservatism 1532:Fiscal conservatism 1528:Economic liberalism 1338:After February 2018 1317:parameter below to 955:WP:Reliable sources 3753:The Globe and Mail 3518:SchizoidNightmares 3387:Wikipageedittor099 3319:SchizoidNightmares 2991:. For comparison, 2764:Political position 2457: 2278:........see also 2153:political factions 2130:InternetArchiveBot 2013:InternetArchiveBot 1392:InternetArchiveBot 1343:InternetArchiveBot 1165:predecessors. The 810:Center-right party 545:Abortion in Canada 120:The Globe and Mail 3707:. 9 August 2022. 3662:. 5 August 2022. 3312: 3300:comment added by 3281: 3269:comment added by 3147:social liberalism 2927:HalfdanRagnarsson 2899: 2898: 2608:978-1-59339-232-1 2584:978-0-7748-2411-8 2546:978-1-4426-3521-0 2499: 2487:comment added by 2444:MP identification 2440: 2424:comment added by 2386:Right-libertarian 2340: 2335:978-1-4875-2168-4 2319: 2314:978-0-7748-3002-7 2298: 2293:978-3-319-58074-6 2277: 1601:I would say that 1477: 1465:comment added by 1427:Liberal Democrats 1368: 1151:AndersenLjundberg 1140:AndersenLjundberg 998: 981:comment added by 918: 767: 267:Stephen Woodworth 75:Same-sex marriage 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3793: 3785: 3784: 3768: 3762: 3761: 3743: 3737: 3736: 3718: 3712: 3711: 3697: 3691: 3690: 3674: 3668: 3667: 3650: 3644: 3643: 3641: 3639: 3624: 3618: 3617: 3615: 3613: 3598: 3575: 3569: 3474: 3468: 3450: 3431: 3425: 3411: 3407: 3406: 3368: 3355:Pierre Poilievre 3216:'s bio article. 3210:2021 sub section 3194: 3188: 3177: 3171: 3074: 3068: 2951: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2890: 2886: 2872: 2871: 2865: 2853: 2850: 2652: 2649: 2639: 2615: 2592: 2568: 2562:Elections Canada 2553: 2510:Left-Libertarian 2468: 2339: 2321: 2318: 2300: 2297: 2279: 2270: 2140: 2131: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2023: 2014: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1402: 1393: 1366: 1365: 1344: 1332: 1305: 1291: 997: 975: 912: 875: 871: 841:. No bias here! 757: 616: 610: 567:No per Resolute 424:properly citated 183: 163: 159: 153: 147: 132: 126: 125:CharlieEchoTango 110: 106: 100: 94: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3792: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3770: 3769: 3765: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3728:The Brandon Sun 3720: 3719: 3715: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3676: 3675: 3671: 3652: 3651: 3647: 3637: 3635: 3626: 3625: 3621: 3611: 3609: 3600: 3599: 3595: 3565: 3464: 3448: 3421: 3404: 3402: 3383: 3373: 3364: 3335: 3292: 3206: 3184: 3167: 3099: 3064: 3045: 2979: 2963: 2945: 2917: 2915: 2903:YeeterSkeeter93 2888: 2884: 2869: 2863: 2851: 2846: 2766: 2723: 2662: 2650: 2645: 2618: 2609: 2595: 2585: 2571: 2556: 2547: 2533: 2505: 2478: 2463: 2446: 2415: 2388: 2336: 2322: 2315: 2301: 2294: 2280: 2242: 2149: 2134: 2129: 2102: 2098: 2047:this simple FaQ 2032: 2017: 2012: 1985: 1981: 1920:this simple FaQ 1905: 1515: 1411: 1396: 1391: 1359: 1352:have permission 1342: 1326: 1299: 1285: 1268:this simple FaQ 1253: 1198: 1159: 1136: 1116: 1007: 976: 927: 873: 869: 845:Thismightbezach 812: 781: 704:220.239.167.151 674:220.239.167.151 664: 614: 608: 585:Elmmapleoakpine 569:Darkness Shines 498:WP:NOTNEWSPAPER 215: 195: 193:History section 179: 175: 157: 151: 145: 142: 130: 124: 104: 98: 92: 89: 86:here for source 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3799: 3797: 3787: 3786: 3763: 3738: 3713: 3692: 3669: 3645: 3619: 3607:Globe and Mail 3592: 3588: 3586: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3436: 3435: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3382: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3362: 3338:conservatives 3334: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3291: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3249:Ok, thanks :) 3205: 3204:Techno problem 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3181: 3115: 3111: 3098: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3078: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3039: 2978: 2975: 2961: 2944: 2938: 2897: 2896: 2873: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2833: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2785: 2784: 2779: 2776: 2773: 2765: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2730:of the party? 2728:interim leader 2722: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2641: 2640: 2627:(2): 213–236. 2616: 2607: 2593: 2583: 2569: 2554: 2545: 2530: 2529: 2504: 2501: 2489:198.13.243.119 2477: 2474: 2445: 2442: 2414: 2411: 2396:libertarianism 2387: 2384: 2354: 2353: 2334: 2313: 2292: 2241: 2238: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2148: 2145: 2124: 2123: 2116: 2092: 2091: 2083:Added archive 2081: 2073:Added archive 2071: 2063:Added archive 2061: 2053:Added archive 2031: 2028: 2007: 2006: 1999: 1975: 1974: 1966:Added archive 1964: 1956:Added archive 1954: 1946:Added archive 1944: 1936:Added archive 1934: 1926:Added archive 1904: 1901: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1832: 1803: 1802: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1665: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1566:I don't think 1548:Libertarianism 1514: 1511: 1495: 1494: 1456: 1455: 1410: 1407: 1386: 1385: 1378: 1311: 1310: 1296: 1282: 1274:Added archive 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1197: 1194: 1158: 1155: 1135: 1132: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1046: 1045: 1035:Jagaer meister 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 969: 968: 926: 923: 881: 880: 811: 808: 780: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 700: 699: 663: 660: 659: 658: 641: 622: 621: 596: 595: 580: 579: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 408: 407: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 329: 328: 327: 291:properly cited 283: 282: 281: 259: 258: 254: 253: 222:a human being. 214: 211: 194: 191: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3798: 3783: 3779: 3778: 3777:The Economist 3773: 3767: 3764: 3760: 3755: 3754: 3749: 3742: 3739: 3735: 3730: 3729: 3724: 3717: 3714: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3696: 3693: 3689: 3684: 3680: 3673: 3670: 3666: 3661: 3660: 3659:National Post 3655: 3649: 3646: 3634: 3630: 3623: 3620: 3608: 3604: 3597: 3594: 3591: 3587: 3578: 3574: 3568: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3550:LemonberryPie 3547: 3543: 3538: 3537: 3535: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3523: 3519: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3501:LemonberryPie 3498: 3497: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3483: 3477: 3473: 3467: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3451: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3434: 3430: 3424: 3420: 3415: 3410: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3369: 3367: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3289: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3203: 3197: 3193: 3187: 3182: 3180: 3176: 3170: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3139: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3125: 3119: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3107: 3103: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3079: 3077: 3073: 3067: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3008:article (cf: 3007: 3001: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2985: 2976: 2974: 2973: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2959: 2955: 2950: 2943: 2939: 2937: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2923: 2913: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2894: 2891:parameter to 2882: 2878: 2874: 2867: 2866: 2860: 2856: 2849: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2783: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2673: 2668: 2665: 2659: 2655: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2594: 2591: 2586: 2581: 2577: 2576: 2570: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2539: 2538: 2532: 2531: 2527: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2502: 2500: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2475: 2473: 2472: 2467: 2462: 2453: 2449: 2443: 2441: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2412: 2410: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2385: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2337: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2316: 2311: 2308:. UBC Press. 2307: 2306: 2295: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2275: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2239: 2237: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2146: 2144: 2143: 2138: 2133: 2132: 2121: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2095: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2035: 2029: 2027: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2015: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1978: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1908: 1902: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1881: 1877: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1512: 1510: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1467:98.143.72.217 1464: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1408: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1363: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1339: 1334: 1330: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1309: 1303: 1297: 1295: 1289: 1283: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1250: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1204: 1195: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1154: 1152: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1113: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1011: 1004: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 973: 972: 971: 970: 967: 964: 960: 956: 952: 951: 950: 949: 945: 941: 935: 931: 924: 922: 921: 916: 911: 910: 905: 900: 895: 894: 890: 886: 885:101.98.175.68 879: 876: 868: 867: 866: 864: 859: 855: 854: 850: 846: 842: 840: 836: 833:is listed as 832: 827: 826: 822: 821: 817: 816: 809: 807: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793: 788: 784: 778: 770: 765: 761: 756: 751: 750: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 732: 731: 728: 725: 721: 716: 715: 714: 713: 709: 705: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 670: 667: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 642: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 623: 620: 617: 611: 605: 601: 598: 597: 594: 590: 586: 582: 581: 578: 574: 570: 566: 565: 556: 553: 550: 546: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 506: 502: 499: 494: 486: 482: 478: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 459: 458: 457: 453: 449: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 409: 406: 402: 398: 393: 392: 370: 366: 362: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 342: 338: 333: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 313: 312: 310: 309: 308: 304: 300: 295: 294: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 233: 232: 229: 223: 218: 210: 209: 205: 201: 192: 190: 189: 186: 184: 182: 172: 166: 162: 160: 154: 148: 139: 138: 137: 133: 127: 121: 116: 115: 114: 113: 109: 107: 101: 95: 87: 83: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3781: 3775: 3766: 3757: 3751: 3741: 3732: 3726: 3716: 3708: 3704: 3695: 3686: 3682: 3672: 3663: 3657: 3648: 3636:. Retrieved 3632: 3622: 3610:. Retrieved 3606: 3596: 3589: 3585: 3545: 3544:rather than 3541: 3539: 3533: 3532: 3447: 3442: 3408: 3384: 3365: 3359:Jean Charest 3336: 3296:— Preceding 3293: 3265:— Preceding 3214:Erin O'Toole 3209: 3207: 3140: 3123: 3122: 3120: 3106:Conservatism 3104: 3100: 3097:CPC ideology 3046: 3002: 2988: 2983: 2980: 2966: 2965: 2954:Conservateur 2946: 2921: 2914: 2900: 2892: 2877:edit request 2832: 2786: 2781: 2767: 2750:MikkelJSmith 2727: 2724: 2707:MikkelJSmith 2692:MikkelJSmith 2690: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2636: 2624: 2620: 2612: 2598: 2590:dominant.... 2588: 2574: 2565: 2561: 2550: 2536: 2506: 2483:— Preceding 2479: 2458: 2447: 2420:— Preceding 2416: 2389: 2373:Monarchist45 2370: 2359:Monarchist45 2355: 2325: 2304: 2283: 2243: 2227:Monarchist45 2223: 2209: 2150: 2128: 2125: 2105: 2096: 2093: 2036: 2033: 2011: 2008: 1988: 1979: 1976: 1909: 1906: 1887: 1635:Centre-right 1603:Conservatism 1524:Conservatism 1516: 1496: 1461:— Preceding 1457: 1412: 1390: 1387: 1362:source check 1341: 1335: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1312: 1257: 1254: 1199: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1160: 1137: 1121:Mattster3517 1117: 1012: 1008: 977:— Preceding 936: 932: 928: 907: 896: 882: 860: 856: 843: 828: 823: 818: 813: 795: 789: 785: 782: 755:Arctic Gnome 701: 671: 668: 665: 643: 599: 515:undue weight 462:24.87.37.146 432:24.87.37.146 427: 423: 419: 415: 368: 364: 360: 290: 286: 234: 225: 220: 216: 196: 180: 176: 143: 119: 90: 82:heterosexual 81: 78: 65: 43: 37: 3688:pro-choice. 3141:I've added 2476:SNC-Lavalin 2459:Thanks. // 1329:Sourcecheck 1236:Ground Zero 1203:Ground Zero 959:Ground Zero 863:centre-left 835:Center-left 736:WP:RNEUTRAL 609:Orange Mike 36:This is an 3665:thinking." 3638:August 25, 3612:August 25, 3590:References 3449:Ak-eater06 3290:protection 3151:Humberland 3109:(Canadian) 3050:Humberland 2885:|answered= 2426:Peeknocker 2137:Report bug 2020:Report bug 1876:Sonicfox44 1837:Sonicfox44 1788:WP:PROVEIT 1743:Sonicfox44 1643:Sonicfox44 1639:Right-wing 1399:Report bug 837:, and not 361:notability 3129:WildComet 3029:WildComet 2989:in office 2400:VivaSlava 2180:Jay942942 2120:this tool 2113:this tool 2003:this tool 1996:this tool 1808:Jay942942 1754:Jay942942 1724:Jay942942 1685:Jay942942 1655:Jay942942 1587:Jay942942 1553:Jay942942 1518:party is 1484:Jay942942 1431:Jay942942 1382:this tool 1375:this tool 1302:dead link 1288:dead link 1134:New Lead! 983:Scbritton 940:Scbritton 909:Львівське 904:WP:RECENT 874:Zippanova 839:Left-wing 740:117Avenue 648:Lord Roem 631:JayJasper 369:relevance 252:relevant. 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3683:Politico 3633:Politico 3443:Canadian 3414:big tent 3409:Not done 3298:unsigned 3267:unsigned 2967:Rosguill 2962:signed, 2922:Not done 2816:drugs.-- 2664:Hello, 2485:unsigned 2461:sikander 2434:contribs 2422:unsigned 2247:Big tent 2147:Factions 2126:Cheers.— 2009:Cheers.— 1551:taken?-- 1513:Ideology 1463:unsigned 1388:Cheers.— 1067:Gentek16 1053:Gentek16 1015:Gentek16 991:contribs 979:unsigned 915:говорити 764:contribs 734:There's 627:WP:UNDUE 604:WP:UNDUE 428:relevant 418:bill is 365:citation 287:reliable 181:Karl 334 146:NereusAJ 93:NereusAJ 3705:The Hub 3340:Produda 3317:force. 3251:GoodDay 3218:GoodDay 3124:sourced 2746:GoodDay 2732:GoodDay 2256:Spilia4 2043:my edit 1916:my edit 1509:Hebhom 1315:checked 1306:tag to 1292:tag to 1264:my edit 1218:Kndimov 1183:GoodDay 420:notable 131:contact 39:archive 3759:rally. 3487:Kawnhr 3237:Kawnhr 3083:Kawnhr 3014:Kawnhr 1629:, and 1613:, and 1499:Hebhom 1323:failed 1298:Added 1284:Added 1177:. The 1169:& 1094:Knoper 519:WP:POV 426:, and 367:, and 3121:From 3012:). — 2889:|ans= 2875:This 2839:WP:OR 1709:Cowik 797:brill 689:Cmr08 477:Rrius 337:Rrius 317:Rrius 299:Rrius 271:Rrius 238:Rrius 200:Rrius 16:< 3640:2022 3614:2022 3567:Moxy 3554:talk 3522:talk 3505:talk 3491:talk 3466:Moxy 3455:talk 3423:Moxy 3391:talk 3344:talk 3323:talk 3306:talk 3275:talk 3255:talk 3241:talk 3222:talk 3186:Moxy 3169:Moxy 3155:talk 3145:and 3133:talk 3087:talk 3066:Moxy 3054:talk 3033:talk 3018:talk 2995:and 2984:zero 2931:talk 2907:talk 2848:Moxy 2822:talk 2818:삭은사과 2807:talk 2803:삭은사과 2792:talk 2788:삭은사과 2754:talk 2736:talk 2711:talk 2705:??? 2696:talk 2647:Moxy 2604:ISBN 2580:ISBN 2542:ISBN 2514:talk 2493:talk 2466:talk 2430:talk 2404:talk 2377:talk 2363:talk 2347:talk 2343:Moxy 2331:ISBN 2310:ISBN 2289:ISBN 2260:talk 2231:talk 2216:talk 2212:Moxy 2199:talk 2184:talk 2174:and 2161:talk 1894:talk 1890:Moxy 1880:talk 1854:talk 1850:Moxy 1841:talk 1826:talk 1822:Moxy 1812:talk 1796:talk 1792:Moxy 1773:talk 1758:talk 1747:talk 1728:talk 1713:talk 1689:talk 1674:talk 1659:talk 1647:talk 1591:talk 1577:talk 1557:talk 1534:and 1503:talk 1488:talk 1471:talk 1450:lute 1447:Reso 1435:talk 1425:and 1319:true 1222:talk 1187:talk 1144:talk 1125:talk 1098:talk 1071:talk 1057:talk 1039:talk 1019:talk 987:talk 944:talk 899:here 889:talk 849:talk 801:talk 760:talk 744:talk 727:lute 724:Reso 708:talk 693:talk 678:talk 652:talk 635:talk 615:Talk 589:talk 573:talk 552:lute 549:Reso 505:talk 501:Moxy 481:talk 466:talk 452:talk 448:Moxy 436:talk 416:this 401:talk 397:Moxy 341:talk 321:talk 303:talk 289:and 275:talk 242:talk 204:talk 3457:) 3366:Yue 2887:or 2879:to 2629:doi 2178:.-- 2087:to 2077:to 2067:to 2057:to 1970:to 1960:to 1950:to 1940:to 1930:to 1356:RfC 1333:). 1321:or 1278:to 629:.-- 155:| 102:| 3774:. 3756:. 3750:. 3731:. 3725:. 3703:. 3685:. 3681:. 3656:. 3631:. 3605:. 3556:) 3524:) 3507:) 3493:) 3393:) 3371:🌙 3346:) 3325:) 3308:) 3277:) 3257:) 3243:) 3224:) 3157:) 3135:) 3089:) 3056:) 3035:) 3020:) 2933:) 2909:) 2893:no 2852:🍁 2824:) 2809:) 2794:) 2756:) 2738:) 2713:) 2698:) 2651:🍁 2644:-- 2635:. 2625:21 2623:. 2611:. 2587:. 2564:. 2560:. 2549:. 2516:) 2495:) 2469:} 2464:{ 2436:) 2432:• 2406:) 2379:) 2365:) 2349:) 2341:-- 2262:) 2233:) 2218:) 2210:-- 2201:) 2186:) 2163:) 1896:) 1856:) 1828:) 1814:) 1798:) 1790:-- 1775:) 1760:) 1730:) 1715:) 1691:) 1676:) 1661:) 1625:, 1621:, 1609:, 1605:, 1593:) 1579:) 1559:) 1546:, 1530:, 1505:) 1490:) 1473:) 1437:) 1421:, 1417:, 1369:. 1364:}} 1360:{{ 1331:}} 1327:{{ 1304:}} 1300:{{ 1290:}} 1286:{{ 1238:| 1234:. 1224:) 1205:| 1189:) 1146:) 1127:) 1100:) 1073:) 1059:) 1041:) 1021:) 993:) 989:• 961:| 946:) 891:) 851:) 803:) 762:• 746:) 710:) 695:) 680:) 654:) 644:No 637:) 612:| 591:) 575:) 507:) 483:) 468:) 454:) 438:) 430:. 422:, 403:) 363:, 343:) 323:) 305:) 277:) 244:) 206:) 134:) 3642:. 3616:. 3570:- 3552:( 3520:( 3503:( 3489:( 3469:- 3453:( 3426:- 3389:( 3342:( 3321:( 3304:( 3273:( 3253:( 3239:( 3220:( 3189:- 3172:- 3153:( 3131:( 3085:( 3069:- 3052:( 3031:( 3016:( 2929:( 2905:( 2820:( 2805:( 2790:( 2752:( 2734:( 2709:( 2694:( 2631:: 2528:. 2512:( 2491:( 2428:( 2402:( 2375:( 2361:( 2345:( 2338:. 2317:. 2296:. 2276:) 2258:( 2229:( 2214:( 2197:( 2182:( 2159:( 2155:. 2139:) 2135:( 2122:. 2115:. 2103:Y 2022:) 2018:( 2005:. 1998:. 1986:Y 1892:( 1878:( 1852:( 1839:( 1824:( 1810:( 1794:( 1771:( 1756:( 1745:( 1726:( 1711:( 1687:( 1672:( 1657:( 1645:( 1589:( 1575:( 1555:( 1501:( 1486:( 1469:( 1433:( 1401:) 1397:( 1384:. 1377:. 1240:t 1220:( 1207:t 1185:( 1163:2 1142:( 1123:( 1096:( 1069:( 1055:( 1037:( 1017:( 985:( 963:t 942:( 917:) 913:( 887:( 870:☭ 847:( 799:( 766:) 758:( 742:( 706:( 691:( 676:( 650:( 633:( 587:( 571:( 503:( 479:( 464:( 450:( 434:( 399:( 339:( 319:( 315:- 301:( 273:( 240:( 236:- 202:( 161:) 158:C 152:T 149:( 128:( 108:) 105:C 99:T 96:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index