Talk:Contact lens - Knowledge

2303:

any reader to follow. Also, all of the information was not only relevant, but also original in the sense that none of the information was repeated by multiple people contributing to the article. There were no instances of extra information being added in, every idea in this article effectively contributed to the article as a whole. The topic was completely covered from the origins of the idea of creating contact lenses up to the present day form of contact lenses. All of the information was correctly cited and all of the sources were authoritative, reliable articles from either reputable Internet websites or peer reviewed journals. One negative thing about this section of the article was the lack of insightful photographs used. The only picture in this section was a portrait of Adolf Fick, the man who is credited with creating the first usable contact lenses, made out of blown glass. More pictures of things directly relevant to contact lenses could have made this section at least a little bit more effective. I would recommend this section fo the article to any interested person, as I feel that it is an all around well written, informative article.

1851:"Purchasing contact lenses online may save consumers time, but the process could cause more problems in the long run, according to a new study reported in the January issue of Optometry: Journal of the American Optometric Association. The research, conducted by Joshua Fogel, Ph.D., and Chaya Zidile of Brooklyn College, found that individuals who did not purchase their contact lenses from an eye doctor, but from an online site or store, are potentially placing themselves at greater risk. The findings indicated that online and store purchasers (consumers who get their contacts at a wholesale club or optical chain outlet) are less likely to adhere to healthy eye care practices, as recommended by their eye doctor." 1931:

objects. It's separate from the blink reflex (though related). I do not believe this to be OR to include this. Aside from the fact there are few sources cited in the section anyway, it's common knowledge that one must train to put contact lenses in and remove them (this is reflected later in the section), and this includes overcoming the hesitency against touching the eyeball. I do know there are people who simply cannot do it (I saw a percentage listed somewhere) and thus cannot wear contacts; I happen to fall into that demographic. I attempted to wear contacts a few years back but abandoned it because I was unable to overcome the hesitancy.

341: 2651: 1403:

good enough to make out it's top and bottom it's best to orient it correctly. (The lense will fix it's oriention within your eye with minor help (blinking and moving the eyes up/down/left/right)) Non-toric lenses generally have no "up". Note that this is in contrast to inside-out; in which the only way to fix is to take them out. Actualy if looking thru one eye with a contact if there were a portion of your vision clear and another part not; that would indicate a problem. (Torn contact lense; lense inside out; etc.)

158: 521: 379: 1441:: Knowledge needs some explanation of how diopter measurments fit with the "20/20" system of visual acuity. I'm looking for a rough equivalent of acuity and diopter measurements (which will have to be +/- becuase acuity does not determine myopia vs. hyperopia). Maybe a table with some standard acuity values (e.g. 20/20, 20/40, ... 20/400) and their equivalent diopter ranges? For example, it seems to me that 20/30 is equivalent to a +/- 1 diopter prescription. 242: 142: 561: 2685: 2595: 370: 1256:"Single use lenses are also useful for people who use contacts infrequently." Doesn't sound quite right to me, I'm trying to express that people who were glasses as well as contants would find daily disposibles better, as they would used them as required, but if you have monthly disposible and only wear them once or twice that month, you still have to throw them away. 439: 412: 1882:"The author also notes that according to documents submitted by the Attorneys General of 17 states, including California, to FTC on September 7, 1997, a multi- state investigation failed to reveal any study showing a correlation between compromised ocular health and receipt of lenses through alternative channels rather than through eye- care practi tioners." 449: 2797: 2103:. I am about to outline a partial list of issues that need to be addressed. After I post this listing, I will give concerned and interested editors a week before I reevaluate the article's quality rating. I will be following along with the progress of the article and may make additional comments as it is appropriate. 1857:

The distribution of contact lenses is a long (decades) running story of conspiracy (the government's words not mine - FTC and Attorney Generals use this term for the industry's behaviour) between ECP's and manufacturers to make customers pay more for lenses. When I have the time I will compile a list

1087:

I don't think there's a problem with adding the things to the todo list. If there's a disagreement, we can discuss it here on talk. Regarding your question on the list, about specific patient populations, I'd recommend putting it in the "prescription" section right now. We may choose to do something

2381:

I have just moved old discussions to an archive page as most topics were several years old. I am planning a total re-write of this page. Anyone interested in helping is encouraged to respond to this topic or post on my talk page. Anyone opposed should do the same. I am copying the source code of

1359:

Ok, I made a huge edit that merged the sections. There is still some overlap, but someone else can deal with that : ) . I think the materials section should go over more about what the materials do, and not about when there were developed etc. I didn't change content, but a change in content of that

3210:

Drying of hands using towels or tissues before handling contact lenses can transfer lint (fluff) to the hands and, subsequently, to the lenses, causing irritation upon insertion. Towels, unless freshly laundered on high temperature wash, are frequently contaminated with large quantities of bacteria

2461:

I think this is the perfect description for contact lenses. Follow our simple steps to save on your contact lens purchase: Visit your eye care practitioner for a complete eye exam and to be fitted for your contact lenses. Your eye care practitioner will provide you with the lens that works best for

2302:

The first thing that people will always notice about any piece of written work is how well the particular piece was written. The history section of this article reads very well and is free of grammatical errors. All of the information is presented in an organized chronological form that is easy for

2223:

The article claims that disposable daily lenses are thinner and weaker, without references. I believe that they are exactly the same stuff as less frequent change interval lenses. The difference is marketing. They are a different price point. People are willing to believe that the lenses branded as

1688:

I removed a ridiculously long and seemingly random listing of people who have worn cosmetic contact lenses in various movies and music videos. This is already a long article and it really added nothing of value. That section could use a general clean-up, if someone has a particular interest in that

1584:

The lead usefully mentions some numbers with regard to how many people wear contacts worldwide and in a couple of other countries, but one notable omission is how this compares to the numbers of glasses-wearers. I came here looking for something like "X million people wear contact lenses in country

975:

anyway. Using both names (at least on the first mention of the substance) makes it clear to all, and lets the article stand on its own. Even if you were to click over to "Perspex," the article in its current state doesn't mention other trade names for PMMA. You'd have to go to its talk page to find

1377:

It was said on this page that August Muller made the first "true" contacts. I changed that to "more convenient" - but I was wondering what someone meant by "true" contact lenses - and by all means if i was wrong to change it, change it back. But if you do, please explain what a "true" contact lens

3169:

What is going on with the second “Usage” section in this article? It simply is a list of three external links with short descriptions. This seems like a mistake and may be a failed attempt to add citations to the first “Usage” section of this article, which actually has text content. Can somebody

1402:

All soft contacts move somewhat when they are in your eyes, and this allows you to see out of the corner of your eyes clearly with contacts when for normal glasses that would just be a blur. Toric lenses (for astigmatism[sp?) are somewhat more rigid, and consequently if your uncorrected vision is

1930:

I have added a paragraph to the Insertion and Removal section discussing one aspect of contact lens use that is not mentioned. And that is in order to actually be able to use contacts, one has to learn to overcome the instinct that prevents us from touching our eyeballs with our fingers or other

1320:

Much of the information in the History section (1) is repeated in the Constructional Material section (3.2). As I read the article, I got to 3.2 and thought I was reading the article again, the content is so similar. These should either be merged together, or the appropriate information for each

2398:

I just made an edit and I want to justify it here. On Dec 3 2011, an edit was made to the replacement schedule section. The edit was not only without a proper source, but was untrue. Contact lenses are a medical device. As such, manufacturers can not make any claims not supported my medical

1569:

I thought the mention of the name "ChromaGen" in the "corrective contact lens" subsection of the "Types of Contact Lenses" section was unwarranted. Seems a bit like advertisement to me. Even conceding that it is integral to the article, there is no proper lead-up to the word "ChromaGen" and no

1076:

Perhaps it was inappropriate to put so many things on the to do list and not discuss them on the talk page first. If that is the case, feel free to (re)move any items. That being said, I am excited about this project and am determined to make this page top notch. I especially want to cover the

1633:

Are there conditions other than 'dry eye' where contacts shouldn't be used? Also, I don't have a citable source for this, but university chemistry labs tend to prohibit wearing them. Harmful gasses or liquids can be trapped in or behind the lens, making them difficult to flush out, leading to

721:

How about a paragraph on how they actually work? I have heard from friends that they supposedly change the shape of the eye by "pressuring" it into taking the correct shape. I am fairly sure that they work as normal lenses, refracting the light that enters them, but I would like some definite

1005:

Isn't there a type of lens that one wears overnight to reshape the cornea. It's removed in the morning and your vision is improved or restored. After about 3 days it degrades again. I heard abotu it as an alternative to corrective surgeryt and don't see why they shouldn't be included in the

747:"The first cosmetic contact was designed by optometrist named frankie for the price of about $ 5000 to a playboy model for a halloween photo shoot. (please fill in the name of this woman and date, its the photo of her wrapped with a snake)" This article looks like it needs some cleanup.... 2736:

Hi Rosa and welcome, to avoid getting disappointed before you edit I just wondered what is that you wish to change or add to this article? if you don't like to discuss in this talk page before actually editing I recommend you to edit less important pages and after a few days you will be

2363:

I think you answered your own question. Multipurpose solution is designed to care for soft lenses. It will not cause any harm to your RGP lenses or your eyes, but it will not clean the lenses as well as a care system designed for RGP lenses. (Don't ask Knowledge. Call your doctor.)

2818:, which can progress to bacterial keratitis which can lead to corneal perforations, scarring, and vision impairment. Furthermore, decreased corneal sensitivity following extended contact lens wear may increase a person’s susceptibility to becoming infected without being aware of it. 1392:

I got my first eye glass prescription a year ago and I am thinking about switching to contacts. Can u guys tell me more about them. Is there a downside to contacts versus glasses. Do contacts move with your eyeball or is there only a circular field in your vision where everything is

781:

I moved the detail on the bandage lenses earlier in the article. Bandage lenses are a sub-set of medically prescribed contact lenses. They are important but represent an extremely low proportion of contact lenses. So, I think the detail should remain but it does not merit its own

1903:

I'm going to remove the brand name from this paragraph: "Newer generations of multipurpose solutions, such as OPTI-FREE RepleniSH are effective against bacteria, fungi, and acanthamoeba and are designed to condition the lenses while soaking". Sound like advertising, doesn't it?

2809:

In general, contact lens use is thought to be safe as long as the proper precautions are adhered to. The most prominent risks associated with long-term, chronic low oxygen to the cornea include increased epithelial permeability, bacterial adherence, microcysts, corneal

966:

Many people are unfamiliar with "Perspex" and only know PMMA as "Plexiglas." Both are trademarks, but since the neutral term "PMMA" would also be unfamiliar to most people, I changed the mention of it to "Perspex/Plexiglas." The link is unchanged, since

897:

soft, but I don't think I've seen hard ones, so I'm a poor judge. My second image-related question involves the picture of the eye with the lens inserted. Can anyone see the lens there? I can't, and I'm wondering what purpose that image is serving.

2445:. The Eye care professionals article is poorly and confusingly written and does not easily supplement the knowledge of someone trying to learn about contact lenses. I plan to improve that article, but in the meantime, the link will be removed. 1824:! How ubercool is that? Imagine the potential for PC gaming! Anyway, the lenses are currently being tested on rabbits, to test for longterm health effects. There is a short segment on them in the tech news section of the latest edition (#150) of 1208:

Can anyone find a good photo of gas permeable contact lenses? I tried to take some at the office this morning, but I do not have a good camera for shooting small objects. I will try again and upload the photos to Commons for consideration.

761:

I feel this is an important treatment for large corneal erosion or abrasions. It not only improves patient comfort, but helps the epithelium heal in an organized manner. I think this is a legit section, though could be rewritten. Comments?

1604:

somebody needs to point out, that 'multifocals' are not translating bifocals. part of the light entering the eye, is focused correctly, the 'wrong focus' part, is not focused correctly. There is no 'shift', loke there is in bifocal

2488:

dear wikipedia Contacts are your user help you can use the on your user. if you want to come with your computer that,s ok lots of love ved. Xxx Dear wikipedia if you want to bring your documents that,s ok. lots of love ved. Xxx

2096: 1107:

Who was the California optician who refined the plastic lens? Does anyone have a reference for this? Also, much of the info in the "Rigid vs. soft contact lenses" section can be moved to the "History" section.

1077:

factors that go into prescribing contacts as well as proper contact hygein and complications that may result from poor compliance. With so many people wearing contacts, I see this as a public health issue.

135: 915:

These lenses are definitely soft. A good picture of hard or "Gas Permeable" lenses would be nice for comparison. And yes, if you expand the picture with the lens inserted, you can clearly see the lens.

3215:

So one should leave one's hands unwiped in the air until they dry by themselves? What if one's skin is already so dry that this process will make one shed flakes onto the lens? Is there no workaround?

1781:

I hadn't thought of it being used in other contexts than contact lenses. I'll remove the merge tags. Is there any other appropriate tag requesting expansion of the article other than just the stub tag?

150: 1417:

It might also be a good idea to point out the need to throughly rinse off the soap before either inserting or removing the contacts. (It's very painful if some of the soap is still on your fingers.)

944:

Are you guys still interested in a picture of an RGP (hard) contact lens? I could put it next to a soft one as well (I wear one hard one and a soft one) and there is a significant size difference --

1139:

says no, unles they are scleral. Same source also mentions that air conditioning in offices/airplanes drys them out. Just some ideas to throw into the mix as my prose writing isn't up to much! :)

1716:

section with more specific sections for each kind of contact lenses. Even if the toric lens article was just expanded I don't think they're different enough to warrant their own article.

3282: 1501:

That page's link was non useful; because it redirects to fungus and mostly talks about much larger fungi such as mushrooms. The link to the specific type of fungus is the useful one.

530: 422: 1300:

I agree that the subheadings needed to be changed, but several of the terms you suggested really are not the common usage. I'm sure we can come up with simpler ones we all agree on.

2462:

you. If you go to buy the contact lenses then you must know about that products. And my suggestion is therightcontactlens.com because it is only for good and best contact lenses.

2715:

My name is Rosa Trieu and I'm a graduate student at USC, helping Andrew Lih on a research project for Knowledge. Would you mind granting me access to edit the contact lens page?

2784: 467: 1344:

I'm going to move all the history from the "contact materials" section, to the history section. The materials section should only be concerned with just that - materials.

772:

I think we should absolutely put bandage lenses back in a seperate section. I also think we should spread up the corrective and the cosmetic lens into seperate sections.--

171: 1854:

The article should NOT cite one single study that is contradicting a number of studies. Either it should include more articles or exclude the study that is included now.

1734:

has a more general use in optics, so if it can't be expanded it should probably be left as a stub or possibly merged elsewhere (an optics or lens article), but not into

471: 848:

One question: Is it appropriate to single out Acuevue? If brands are to be added, at the very least Ciba and Cooper should be included as they worn by many patients. --

2933: 340: 1290:

to be a little confusing, so I took the liberty of renaming them. I'm new around this article, so if anyone disagrees, please just revert me and I won't be offended.

3272: 3307: 3111: 3107: 3093: 2975: 2971: 2957: 2877: 535: 1858:

of links to documents from sources such as the FTC, US Congress, McKinsey & Co etc. that help readers get first hand facts about contact lens distribution.

3287: 1266:

This part should adress, what the differences between daily disposable, monthly disposable and other lenses are, and not find POV-arguments for wearing them. --

383: 3312: 1034: 79: 1154:

They can also be used in movies and amusement parks (though rarely outside of these fictional settings) to make the iris appear unnatural in appearence.

3322: 3297: 3267: 2008: 511: 501: 2418:

There seems to be some need for fact checking as the term "Silicone hydrogel" may have been used to describe lenses that are not silicone hydrogels.

2319: 2120: 253: 184: 1130: 3317: 3302: 3277: 1534: 2251:

Citation link #26 (the one on adverse effects of cosmetic lenses) has a very disturbing image right at the top. Can I stick a warning on there?

1653:

I didn't know ptosis and keratoconus could be complications of contact lens wear. Can anyone explain this or perhaps these should be removed.

815:

Lens designs (spherical, toric, bifocal, monovision, orthokeratology). This would incorporate some of the existing sphere vs. toric section.

3216: 2943: 85: 2382:

the article to a text editor and I will likely post changes one section at a time. Thank you for your support and constructive criticism.

2109: 1531:

i saw in so many brands that they write specific set of numbers after the brand name....like 55 ....do there any code or something for it??

2548: 2522: 2496: 2469: 2252: 1911: 1889: 1865: 1782: 1717: 1538: 44: 2127: 3079: 1016:

I re-wrote some of 'spherical v toric', what was written would make no sense to a non-specialist. This article needs lots of expansion.--

809:

I have added various bits of information to this article in recent days. I would like to continue and I propose the following sections:

3235: 3069: 2231: 1966: 1932: 1654: 476: 268: 702:

How about removing the 'atop the iris' part? Could be confusing and is redundant as we've already stated it is placed 'on the cornea'.

3292: 3190: 2572: 2196: 2162: 2071: 2035: 263: 3089:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2953:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2934:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081003075751/http://acuvue-now.com/latest-news/news-flash/121-green-light-for-1-day-acuvue-trueye.html

1458:

If the link is completely redundant, then the pages should be merged. Perhaps some of these pages should be merged or reorganized:

3053: 792:

Agreed, but it shouldn't be burried in a paragraph on comsmetic lenses. Maybe not a BCL section, but at least its own paragraph --

2286: 2200: 2166: 2075: 2039: 3262: 3257: 1845:

There are several studies showing that there is no significant difference in eye health depending on the distribution channel.

1841:

The article is biased towards traditional channels (i.e. ECP's) vs. alternative channels (online, mail order, discount outlets)

1585:

Y, compared with Z million people who wear glasses". It would be interesting to see how the proportions vary around the world.

259: 99: 30: 2897:

Rather than pull out individual entries that have become irrelevant, I've archived the entire talk page through Jan 28, 2014.

462: 417: 104: 20: 2937: 1194:

of contact lens rather than a usage; but it's a bit difficult at present to see where this sentence might be better placed.

1122:

wrt to usage, there appears to be no mention of why people chose contact lens over glasses. Two reasons come to mind for me

2351: 2002: 1801: 1769: 1743: 1694: 74: 1816:

Hasn't anyone read the tech news? They're testing contact lenses that have miniature circutry in them that can project a

3154: 3018: 2634:

placed on the eye. It is a contact lens placed on the eye to correct vision. (could you please add to correct vision).

2136:

The article has numerous short paragraphs, and it would probably be improved if some paragraphs were merged or expanded.

2133:

The article has numerous paragraphs without any citations. The article will require at least one citation per paragraph

862:

Would there be any objection to adding another picture showing what contact lenses actually look like? I'm thinking of

392: 2737:

auto-confirmed and will be able to edit this page. However, the preferred approach is that you discuss it here first.

1994: 654:

How about removing the "Contact lens review" link at the bottom? It appears to be a blatant attempt at advertising. --

213: 65: 3175: 208: 2315: 241: 3220: 2022: 1980: 1832: 818:

Wearing modalities (daily wear vs. extended wear). This would use some of the detail from the existing section.

633: 3110:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2974:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

838:

I think all of these are worthwhile. I would especially be intresting in expanding the adverse events section.--

222: 2552: 2526: 2500: 2256: 1998: 1893: 1869: 1797: 1765: 1739: 1721: 1690: 1542: 126: 2473: 1915: 1786: 191: 2311: 2235: 1331:

I agree. Maybe the materials section should be limited to the history of contact materials currently in use.

3239: 3194: 3145: 3045: 3009: 2925: 2691: 2639: 2601: 1936: 1673: 1658: 1052: 987: 949: 109: 2814:, endothelial polymegathism and potential increase in myopia. Mishandling of contact lenses can also cause 2186:

I will be monitoring the progress of this page and will comment and add further concerns as is warranted.--

1161: 1093: 930: 903: 871: 258:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the 3041: 2944:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070531084455/http://www2a.cdc.gov/HAN/ArchiveSys/ViewMsgV.asp?AlertNum=00260

2576: 2438: 2431: 2192: 2158: 2067: 2031: 1953: 1571: 1059: 1063: 3129:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3117: 2993:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2981: 1957: 1463: 682:

I uploaded these on commons this morning, might be more interesting licence then te one currently used.

398: 324: 3171: 3083: 3044:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2924:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2635: 2347: 3080:

https://archive.is/20130421013228/http://www.lenscompare.co.uk/compare-contact-lenses-latest-research/

1606: 1157: 1089: 1017: 926: 899: 867: 3070:

https://web.archive.org/web/20060304101146/http://new.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/downloads/Pub06_PART_45.pdf

2544: 2518: 2492: 2465: 2339: 2307: 2282: 2274: 2227: 1907: 1885: 1861: 1829: 1590: 812:

Replacement frequencies (new section discussing one day vs. weekly vs. monthly etc lens replacement)

565: 1879: 733: 707: 369: 198: 2947: 2758: 2726: 1974: 1712:

for deletion because it really doesn't add anything, but I think we could merge it and replace the

1516: 1394: 1271: 520: 55: 2343: 655: 1669: 1635: 1438: 945: 828: 227: 70: 3114:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3054:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150129033858/http://www.andrewgasson.co.uk/opioneers_wichterle.htm

2978:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3130: 2994: 3073: 2856: 2204: 2187: 2170: 2153: 2149: 2079: 2062: 2043: 2026: 51: 1796:

There's the "expand" tag, which I've just added, since I had to look up the template anyway.

2815: 2772: 2742: 1639: 1379: 1361: 1345: 1236: 1220: 990:, which is a fancy, filled out article that mentions both trqademarks and other trade names. 224: 177: 3137: 3001: 2663: 2278: 2100: 1988: 1586: 1475: 1459: 1452: 1223:, but it's not a specially exciting photo. I can have a go at taking another one, though. 1156:

Is there something I'm missing? When are cosmetic lenses widely used in amusement parks?

1007: 991: 986:

FOLLOW-UP: So actually, the Perspex link goes to a disambig page. I changed it to link to

977: 454: 2938:

http://acuvue-now.com/latest-news/news-flash/121-green-light-for-1-day-acuvue-trueye.html

3057: 1668:

I believe these are for hard lenses and not soft. There should be many sources on this.

3096:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2960:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2842: 2754: 2722: 2208: 2174: 2083: 2047: 1919: 1897: 1873: 1756:(so merging wouldn't help this article) and the merge was already done and reversed at 1267: 1132:

quotes a small survey for reasons as 44% therapeutic, 34% cosmetic and 22% convenience.

863: 723: 692: 347: 3136:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3000:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2515:

Dear wikipedia i think you can come to my house september 20th. lots of love ved Xxx

1760:

for the same reason I suggested above. I think you should remove the merge tags. BTW,

3251: 2899: 2824: 2631: 2447: 2420: 2404: 2384: 2366: 2113: 2016: 1518: 1502: 1488: 1471: 1431: 1418: 1404: 1322: 1257: 1140: 689: 614: 3037: 2917: 2442: 1753: 1735: 1713: 1555: 1180: 1109: 665: 569: 24: 1752:

Looking at this a little further, it seems like toric lens are already defined in

1062:, but was removed from the listing because there is a cleanup tag on the article. 1960:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment. 1487:

OPPOSE: Corrective lens is a generic term encomposing both contacts and glasses.

165: 3103: 2967: 2768: 2738: 1840: 1479: 1442: 1332: 1301: 1240: 1210: 1078: 1038: 1027: 917: 881: 849: 839: 793: 773: 763: 2224:

longer lasting really last longer, and thus pay more money for fewer of them.

1764:

has already prod'd, so you will need to AfD it (please let me know if you do).

1570:

indication of it being a brand name. moreover, no link to a ChromaGen article.

1239:

is much better than I could do. I think this is good photo and should be used.

3102:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2966:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1984: 1761: 1757: 1731: 1709: 1291: 1224: 1195: 1137: 1042: 748: 683: 444: 2801: 2657:. The next sentence already states that contacts are used to correct vision 2541:

Hi i was wondering if you can come at 7:30 thank you. lots of love ved Xxx

2142:

The article has several bulletpointed lists that should be put in prose form

968: 2571:

in the article for readers who are unfamiliar with that term. Thank you.

1294: 629: 604:

This article can still be improved, especially in the following sections:

2012: 1970: 125: 1041:. If anyone would like to contribute to that, it would be very welcome. 226: 1467: 1427: 972: 3234:

Needs a new section with a lot more on the options and how they work.

2874:

Effect of Long-term Wear of Hard Contact Lenses on Corneal Sensitivity

2835: 2796: 2402:

I would be glad to discuss this at length with anyone that disagrees.

1554:

Usually, it means the percentage of the lens that's water, by weight.

2568: 2270:

Anyone else find that the inside-out lens subject goes on too long?

1176: 925:

Thanks. I very stupidly failed to look at the expanded image. Sorry.

3243: 3224: 3198: 3179: 3159: 3084:

http://www.lenscompare.co.uk/compare-contact-lenses-latest-research/

3023: 2903: 2828: 2776: 2762: 2746: 2730: 2669: 2643: 2580: 2556: 2530: 2504: 2477: 2451: 2424: 2408: 2388: 2370: 2355: 2323: 2290: 2260: 2239: 2213: 2179: 2088: 2052: 1940: 1835: 1805: 1790: 1773: 1747: 1725: 1698: 1677: 1662: 1643: 1609: 1594: 1574: 1558: 1546: 1521: 1505: 1491: 1482: 1445: 1421: 1407: 1397: 1382: 1364: 1348: 1335: 1325: 1304: 1275: 1260: 1243: 1227: 1213: 1198: 1164: 1143: 1112: 1096: 1081: 1066: 1045: 1020: 1010: 994: 980: 953: 933: 920: 906: 884: 874: 852: 842: 831: 796: 776: 766: 751: 736: 726: 710: 686: 668: 658: 2099:. This article needs to be edited to meet the current standards of 438: 411: 2811: 2795: 2335:

Can i use solution for soft lenses for my gas permeable lenses?

1848:

Under the "Contact lens prescription" section the article reads:

1880:

http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/contactlensrule/04-02235-1142.pdf

1825: 976:

out. So there's my convoluted rationale for a very simple edit.

646:

Some information on health risks of regular contact-lens wear?

474:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at 2948:

http://www2a.cdc.gov/HAN/ArchiveSys/ViewMsgV.asp?AlertNum=00260

2767:

actually self-training in contact lens use is not recommended.

141: 2679: 2589: 1817: 551: 363: 228: 15: 2843:"What's the Best Prescription for Healthy Contact Lens Wear?" 466:, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the 519: 262:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be 2139:

The article has a citation needed tag in need of attention.

3074:

http://new.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/downloads/Pub06_PART_45.pdf

3063: 3048:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2928:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2130:, the article has two dab page links in need of attention. 3170:

knowledgeable about the situation fix this? Thank you! —

2219:

Evidence that one-day disposables are thinner and weaker?

1619:

was: "piss off Leonardo da Vinci is frequently credited"

149: 827:

I would appreciate any thoughts on the above. Cheers. (

821:

Lens care systems, using some of the existing material.

2921: 593: 587: 581: 575: 317: 298: 2123:, the article has a deadlink and two suspicious links. 3211:

and, as such, should be avoided when handling lenses.

3058:

http://www.andrewgasson.co.uk/opioneers_wichterle.htm

2785:

Effects of long-term contact lens wear on the cornea

1136:

Other possible usage topics - can you swim in them?

272:

of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

3106:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2970:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1625:EDIT: nevermind, someone else already did, haha. 1515:I don't think they're mentioned in this article. 1088:different with it as the article develops more. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2661:for cosmetic reasons, which are both correct. — 1820:into the users eye! Just like the Iriscam's in 470:and that biomedical information in any article 3283:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Technology 3092:This message was posted before February 2018. 2956:This message was posted before February 2018. 1580:Numbers of contacts wearers v glasses wearers? 2441:article previously found at the start of the 468:Manual of Style for medicine-related articles 197: 157: 8: 2822:I incorporated this info into the article. 1321:section isolated to just one or the other. 348:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive 893:I don't know if they're soft or not. They 406: 277: 236: 3036:I have just modified 3 external links on 2916:I have just modified 2 external links on 2145:The article could benefit from an infobox 2857:"Corneal Abrasion in Emergency Medicine" 2243:adlof fick has a funny name!!!!hahahaha 1649:Complications - ptosis? and keratoconus? 1175:Some contact lenses cover the white (or 2876:was invoked but never defined (see the 2834: 2095:I am reviewing this article as part of 1179:) of the eye; these are referred to as 786:jkohi-p]] 00:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)) 408: 367: 3273:Knowledge vital articles in Technology 2152:as it relates to the use of periods.-- 1058:This article was formerly listed as a 805:Some short term plans for this article 3308:Top-importance ophthalmology articles 3230:Bifocal and multifocal contact lenses 880:Yes, please. Are these soft lenses?-- 183: 7: 3288:B-Class vital articles in Technology 2787:, replaced with link to this article 1219:There's a photo of an RGP lens here 824:Adverse events with contact lenses. 460:This article is within the scope of 2868: 1967:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine 477:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine 397:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2805:, or an inflammation of the cornea 14: 3313:Ophthalmology task force articles 3040:. Please take a moment to review 2920:. Please take a moment to review 2443:Contact Lens Prescription section 1126:sport - safety/conviencence, etc. 3323:Knowledge pages with to-do lists 3298:Mid-importance medicine articles 3268:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 2683: 2649: 2593: 1629:Contraindication/discouraged use 1286:I found the heading names under 1186:This text seems misplaced under 757:Why remove Bandage lens section? 559: 472:use high-quality medical sources 447: 437: 410: 377: 368: 339: 240: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2676:Edit request on 31 January 2013 2586:Edit request on 3 November 2012 2537:Control panel and User accounts 2298:Critique of the History Section 506:This article has been rated as 350:for the week of March 27, 2006. 3318:All WikiProject Medicine pages 3303:B-Class ophthalmology articles 3278:B-Class level-5 vital articles 2753:Page is no longer protected. 2437:I am removing the link to the 2247:I did not need to see that. D: 2214:22:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 2180:22:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 2089:02:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 2053:23:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 1595:00:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 486:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine 254:Natural sciences good articles 1: 2356:15:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC) 1806:02:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 1791:01:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 1774:15:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 1748:15:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 1726:08:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 1644:20:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC) 1622:fixed to remove, "piss off". 1261:23:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1244:22:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1228:20:15, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1214:16:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1199:01:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1165:00:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC) 1144:14:10, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 1113:06:05, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 1097:03:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 1082:03:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 1067:21:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 954:02:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 618:14:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 528:This article is supported by 489:Template:WikiProject Medicine 42:Put new text under old text. 3160:21:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC) 2904:14:13, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 2777:10:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 2763:03:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 2747:09:53, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 2731:07:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 2670:21:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2644:18:56, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 2581:16:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC) 2452:03:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC) 2425:16:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 2409:16:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 2389:02:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC) 2371:18:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC) 1699:17:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 1678:08:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 1046:22:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 1021:09:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 1011:10:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 995:04:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 981:04:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 934:22:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 921:04:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC) 907:02:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 885:11:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 875:16:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 752:00:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 531:the Ophthalmology task force 3244:10:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 3024:14:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC) 2706:to reactivate your request. 2694:has been answered. Set the 2616:to reactivate your request. 2604:has been answered. Set the 2557:09:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2531:09:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2505:09:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 2324:03:37, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 1828:if anyone is interested. -- 1663:11:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 1615:Someone messed up the page. 1610:14:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1497:Removed link to word fungal 1026:Request for peer review on 853:01:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 843:03:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 832:00:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 797:01:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 777:18:49, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 767:17:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 737:02:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 727:23:36, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 711:00:16, 25 August 2005 (UTC) 687:09:04, 14 August 2005 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3339: 3180:07:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC) 3123:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3033:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2987:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2913:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2829:15:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC) 2478:05:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC) 1422:18:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC) 1408:18:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC) 1398:05:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC) 1282:New headings under 'types' 1129:Cosmetic/vainity - Source 639: 634:Archive: 2005- Jan 28 2014 632: 512:project's importance scale 266:. Editors may also seek a 3293:B-Class medicine articles 3225:16:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC) 3199:20:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC) 2240:05:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1941:03:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC) 1920:20:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1836:02:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1575:16:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 1437:Repost of my question on 1383:02:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1365:02:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1349:01:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC) 1336:11:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 1326:05:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC) 1305:00:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 1295:00:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 1276:09:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 669:17:29, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 659:16:30, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 527: 505: 432: 405: 354: 325:Good article reassessment 280: 276: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2845:. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2291:03:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC) 1898:13:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 1874:15:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC) 1708:I considered nominating 1689:aspect of contact lens. 1634:substantial eye injury. 1559:00:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 1522:02:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 1506:18:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1492:18:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 1483:16:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 346:This article was on the 3064:https://www.888lens.com 3029:External links modified 2909:External links modified 2331:storing gas perm lenses 2261:18:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 1547:09:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 1446:14:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC) 1360:section might be good. 1288:Types of contact lenses 1188:Cosmetic contact lenses 1149:Use in amusement parks? 1053:Knowledge:Good articles 988:Polymethyl methacrylate 722:clarification of this. 642:Health Risk perception? 3263:B-Class vital articles 3258:Delisted good articles 3165:Second “Usage” section 2806: 2783:Removed from article: 2484:Contacts and Documents 2439:Eye care professionals 2432:Eye care professionals 706:I agree. Change made. 524: 75:avoid personal attacks 2859:. Medscape Reference. 2799: 2121:external link checker 1958:Talk:Contact lens/GA1 1684:Cosmetic Contact Lens 1537:comment was added by 1464:Eyeglass prescription 1316:Duplicate information 1051:Article removed from 523: 384:level-5 vital article 357:Delisted good article 260:good article criteria 123:Find medical sources: 100:Neutral point of view 3104:regular verification 2968:regular verification 2872:The named reference 2511:Computers and Videos 2112:, the article needs 1812:HUD contact lenses?! 1600:the multi-focal scam 1281: 1118:Usage expansion idea 463:WikiProject Medicine 306:Good article nominee 105:No original research 3094:After February 2018 2958:After February 2018 1999:Delicious carbuncle 1952:This discussion is 1798:Delicious carbuncle 1766:Delicious carbuncle 1740:Delicious carbuncle 1691:Delicious carbuncle 1388:Glasses or Contacts 1311:Ionutcontact lenses 1204:Gas Permeable Photo 1190:, sclerals being a 1035:peer review request 971:simply forwards to 3148:InternetArchiveBot 3099:InternetArchiveBot 3012:InternetArchiveBot 2963:InternetArchiveBot 2893:Archived talk page 2807: 2718:Thanks very much! 2312:HIST406-10dhaines4 2150:WP:CAPTION#Wording 1439:Talk:Visual acuity 1252:disposible section 1037:has been made for 599:Updated 2014-01-28 525: 393:content assessment 318:September 21, 2009 281:Article milestones 129: 86:dispute resolution 47: 3124: 2988: 2902: 2890: 2889: 2827: 2816:corneal abrasions 2710: 2709: 2620: 2619: 2547:comment added by 2521:comment added by 2495:comment added by 2468:comment added by 2450: 2423: 2407: 2387: 2369: 2359: 2342:comment added by 2327: 2310:comment added by 2294: 2277:comment added by 2230:comment added by 2212: 2178: 2126:According to the 2119:According to the 2108:According to the 2087: 2051: 1922: 1910:comment added by 1900: 1888:comment added by 1876: 1864:comment added by 1550: 1237:Image:KC-lens.jpg 1221:Image:KC-lens.jpg 698:Opening paragraph 678:images on commons 625: 624: 617: 610:Current research 550: 549: 546: 545: 542: 541: 492:medicine articles 362: 361: 334: 333: 235: 234: 128:Source guidelines 127: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3330: 3158: 3149: 3122: 3121: 3100: 3022: 3013: 2986: 2985: 2964: 2898: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2875: 2867: 2861: 2860: 2853: 2847: 2846: 2839: 2823: 2701: 2697: 2687: 2686: 2680: 2668: 2653: 2652: 2611: 2607: 2597: 2596: 2590: 2559: 2533: 2507: 2480: 2446: 2419: 2403: 2383: 2377:Planned Rewrite. 2365: 2358: 2336: 2326: 2304: 2293: 2271: 2242: 2190: 2156: 2110:alt text checker 2065: 2055: 2029: 1926:Touching the eye 1905: 1883: 1859: 1532: 630: 613: 600: 563: 562: 552: 494: 493: 490: 487: 484: 457: 452: 451: 450: 441: 434: 433: 428: 425: 414: 407: 390: 381: 380: 373: 372: 364: 355:Current status: 343: 320: 301: 278: 244: 237: 229: 202: 201: 187: 161: 153: 145: 131: 95:Article policies 16: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3248: 3247: 3232: 3217:195.187.108.130 3207: 3187:Further reading 3167: 3152: 3147: 3115: 3108:have permission 3098: 3046:this simple FaQ 3031: 3016: 3011: 2979: 2972:have permission 2962: 2926:this simple FaQ 2911: 2895: 2886: 2873: 2871: 2869: 2864: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2794: 2789: 2699: 2695: 2684: 2678: 2662: 2650: 2609: 2605: 2594: 2588: 2565: 2542: 2539: 2516: 2513: 2490: 2486: 2463: 2459: 2435: 2416: 2396: 2379: 2337: 2333: 2305: 2300: 2272: 2268: 2249: 2225: 2221: 2128:dablink checker 1964: 1948: 1946:GA Reassessment 1928: 1843: 1814: 1706: 1686: 1651: 1631: 1617: 1602: 1582: 1572:202.141.155.253 1567: 1533:—The preceding 1529: 1513: 1511:Athletic lenses 1499: 1476:Eye examination 1460:Corrective lens 1456: 1453:Corrective lens 1435: 1415: 1390: 1375: 1373:"true" contacts 1318: 1313: 1284: 1254: 1206: 1172: 1151: 1120: 1105: 1103:History section 1074: 1056: 1031: 1003: 964: 860: 807: 759: 745: 719: 700: 693:Image:Lens2.jpg 680: 652: 644: 621: 620: 574: 560: 491: 488: 485: 482: 481: 455:Medicine portal 453: 448: 446: 426: 420: 391:on Knowledge's 388: 378: 316: 297: 250:was one of the 231: 230: 225: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 3336: 3334: 3326: 3325: 3320: 3315: 3310: 3305: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3285: 3280: 3275: 3270: 3265: 3260: 3250: 3249: 3231: 3228: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3166: 3163: 3142: 3141: 3134: 3087: 3086: 3078:Added archive 3076: 3068:Added archive 3066: 3062:Added archive 3060: 3052:Added archive 3030: 3027: 3006: 3005: 2998: 2951: 2950: 2942:Added archive 2940: 2932:Added archive 2910: 2907: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2887: 2885: 2884: 2862: 2848: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2793: 2790: 2788: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2765: 2750: 2749: 2721:Regards, Rosa 2708: 2707: 2688: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2618: 2617: 2598: 2587: 2584: 2564: 2561: 2549:109.145.212.56 2538: 2535: 2523:109.145.212.56 2512: 2509: 2497:109.145.212.56 2485: 2482: 2470:122.174.21.168 2458: 2457:Contact Lenses 2455: 2434: 2428: 2415: 2412: 2395: 2392: 2378: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2332: 2329: 2299: 2296: 2267: 2266:Lens Insertion 2264: 2253:216.170.23.231 2248: 2245: 2220: 2217: 2185: 2183: 2182: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2124: 2117: 2105: 2104: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2056: 1947: 1944: 1927: 1924: 1912:89.128.223.165 1890:217.151.192.10 1866:217.151.192.10 1842: 1839: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1783:71.236.217.190 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1718:71.236.195.181 1705: 1704:Merge proposal 1702: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1650: 1647: 1630: 1627: 1616: 1613: 1601: 1598: 1581: 1578: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1539:63.243.163.201 1528: 1525: 1512: 1509: 1498: 1495: 1455: 1449: 1434: 1425: 1414: 1411: 1395:12.221.139.214 1389: 1386: 1374: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1339: 1338: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1231: 1230: 1205: 1202: 1185: 1181:scleral lenses 1171: 1170:Scleral lenses 1168: 1150: 1147: 1134: 1133: 1127: 1119: 1116: 1104: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1073: 1070: 1064:Worldtraveller 1055: 1049: 1030: 1024: 1014: 1002: 999: 998: 997: 963: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 939: 938: 937: 936: 912: 911: 910: 909: 888: 887: 859: 856: 846: 845: 806: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 784: 783: 779: 758: 755: 744: 741: 740: 739: 718: 715: 714: 713: 699: 696: 690:Image:Lens.jpg 679: 676: 674:Health risks? 672: 671: 651: 648: 643: 640: 637: 636: 627: 623: 622: 602: 557: 555: 548: 547: 544: 543: 540: 539: 536:Top-importance 526: 516: 515: 508:Mid-importance 504: 498: 497: 495: 459: 458: 442: 430: 429: 427:Mid‑importance 415: 403: 402: 396: 374: 360: 359: 352: 351: 344: 336: 335: 332: 331: 328: 321: 313: 312: 309: 302: 299:March 13, 2006 294: 293: 290: 287: 283: 282: 274: 273: 245: 233: 232: 223: 221: 220: 217: 216: 204: 203: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3335: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3316: 3314: 3311: 3309: 3306: 3304: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3291: 3289: 3286: 3284: 3281: 3279: 3276: 3274: 3271: 3269: 3266: 3264: 3261: 3259: 3256: 3255: 3253: 3246: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3236:209.93.202.35 3229: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3213: 3212: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3172:Nicolás Macri 3164: 3162: 3161: 3156: 3151: 3150: 3139: 3135: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3119: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3095: 3090: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3065: 3061: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3034: 3028: 3026: 3025: 3020: 3015: 3014: 3003: 2999: 2996: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2983: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2959: 2954: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2914: 2908: 2906: 2905: 2901: 2892: 2879: 2866: 2863: 2858: 2852: 2849: 2844: 2838: 2830: 2826: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2817: 2813: 2804: 2803: 2798: 2792:General risks 2791: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2705: 2702:parameter to 2693: 2689: 2682: 2681: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2660: 2656: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2615: 2612:parameter to 2603: 2599: 2592: 2591: 2585: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2567:Please place 2563:Define Myopia 2562: 2560: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2536: 2534: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2510: 2508: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2483: 2481: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2456: 2454: 2453: 2449: 2444: 2440: 2433: 2429: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2413: 2411: 2410: 2406: 2400: 2393: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2330: 2328: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2297: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2265: 2263: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2246: 2244: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2232:219.190.10.85 2229: 2218: 2216: 2215: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2189: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2125: 2122: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2064: 2060: 2057: 2054: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2028: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1959: 1955: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933:68.146.81.123 1925: 1923: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1901: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1881: 1877: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1855: 1852: 1849: 1846: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1703: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1670:William Ortiz 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655:220.233.5.191 1648: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1614: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1579: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1564: 1560: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1526: 1524: 1523: 1520: 1517: 1510: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1485: 1484: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472:Visual acuity 1469: 1465: 1461: 1454: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1440: 1433: 1432:Visual acuity 1429: 1426: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1396: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1372: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1315: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1251: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1169: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1148: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1138: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1117: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1054: 1050: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1029: 1025: 1023: 1022: 1019: 1013: 1012: 1009: 1000: 996: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 979: 974: 970: 961: 955: 951: 947: 946:funkyteaspoon 943: 942: 941: 940: 935: 932: 928: 924: 923: 922: 919: 914: 913: 908: 905: 901: 896: 892: 891: 890: 889: 886: 883: 879: 878: 877: 876: 873: 869: 865: 857: 855: 854: 851: 844: 841: 837: 836: 835: 833: 830: 825: 822: 819: 816: 813: 810: 804: 798: 795: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 780: 778: 775: 771: 770: 769: 768: 765: 756: 754: 753: 750: 742: 738: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 725: 717:Clarification 716: 712: 709: 705: 704: 703: 697: 695: 694: 691: 688: 685: 677: 675: 670: 667: 663: 662: 661: 660: 657: 649: 647: 641: 638: 635: 631: 628: 619: 616: 611: 608: 605: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 573: 571: 567: 556: 554: 553: 537: 534:(assessed as 533: 532: 522: 518: 517: 513: 509: 503: 500: 499: 496: 479: 478: 473: 469: 465: 464: 456: 445: 443: 440: 436: 435: 431: 424: 423:Ophthalmology 419: 416: 413: 409: 404: 400: 394: 386: 385: 375: 371: 366: 365: 358: 353: 349: 345: 342: 338: 337: 329: 327: 326: 322: 319: 315: 314: 310: 308: 307: 303: 300: 296: 295: 291: 288: 285: 284: 279: 275: 271: 270: 265: 261: 257: 256: 255: 249: 246: 243: 239: 238: 219: 218: 215: 212: 210: 206: 205: 200: 196: 193: 190: 186: 182: 179: 176: 173: 172:ScienceDirect 170: 167: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 137: 134: 130: 124: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3233: 3214: 3209: 3208: 3191:89.64.68.162 3186: 3168: 3146: 3143: 3118:source check 3097: 3091: 3088: 3038:Contact lens 3035: 3032: 3010: 3007: 2982:source check 2961: 2955: 2952: 2918:Contact lens 2915: 2912: 2896: 2870:Cite error: 2865: 2851: 2837: 2808: 2800: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2703: 2692:edit request 2664: 2658: 2654: 2636:Funkyeyes123 2627: 2626:, or simply 2624:contact lens 2623: 2621: 2613: 2602:edit request 2573:64.128.27.82 2566: 2543:— Preceding 2540: 2517:— Preceding 2514: 2491:— Preceding 2487: 2464:— Preceding 2460: 2436: 2417: 2401: 2397: 2380: 2338:— Preceding 2334: 2301: 2269: 2250: 2222: 2188:TonyTheTiger 2184: 2154:TonyTheTiger 2063:TonyTheTiger 2058: 2027:TonyTheTiger 2019: 2005: 1991: 1977: 1951: 1929: 1902: 1878: 1856: 1853: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1830:Simpsons fan 1822:Artemis Fowl 1821: 1815: 1780: 1754:Contact lens 1736:Contact lens 1707: 1687: 1652: 1632: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1603: 1583: 1568: 1565:Advertising? 1530: 1514: 1500: 1486: 1457: 1436: 1416: 1413:care session 1401: 1391: 1376: 1319: 1287: 1285: 1255: 1207: 1191: 1187: 1174: 1173: 1153: 1152: 1135: 1121: 1106: 1075: 1060:good article 1057: 1032: 1015: 1004: 965: 894: 861: 847: 826: 823: 820: 817: 814: 811: 808: 785: 760: 746: 720: 701: 681: 673: 653: 645: 626: 612: 609: 606: 603: 596: 590: 584: 578: 570:Contact lens 564: 558: 529: 507: 475: 461: 399:WikiProjects 382: 356: 323: 305: 304: 269:reassessment 267: 252: 251: 248:Contact lens 247: 207: 194: 188: 180: 174: 168: 162: 154: 146: 138: 132: 122: 94: 25:Contact lens 19:This is the 3185:Renamed to 2394:Recent Edit 2306:—Preceding 2273:—Preceding 2226:—Preceding 1954:transcluded 1906:—Preceding 1884:—Preceding 1860:—Preceding 1607:CorvetteZ51 1605:eyeglasses. 1380:Fresheneesz 1362:Fresheneesz 1346:Fresheneesz 1039:Keratoconus 1028:Keratoconus 1018:CorvetteZ51 650:Advertising 264:renominated 31:not a forum 3252:Categories 3155:Report bug 3019:Report bug 2696:|answered= 2665:KuyaBriBri 2606:|answered= 2399:research. 2279:Zallomallo 2205:WP:CHICAGO 2171:WP:CHICAGO 2080:WP:CHICAGO 2044:WP:CHICAGO 1965:Notified: 1762:Toric lens 1758:Toric lens 1732:Toric lens 1710:Toric lens 1587:Loganberry 1072:To Do List 1008:Ckamaeleon 1001:Lens Types 992:Ckamaeleon 978:Ckamaeleon 566:To-do list 3138:this tool 3131:this tool 3002:this tool 2995:this tool 2878:help page 2802:Keratitis 2755:RudolfRed 2723:Rosatrieu 2655:Not done: 2097:GA Sweeps 1714:By design 1527:Number 55 1478:, etc. 1451:See also 1268:Trickstar 969:Plexiglas 734:Edwardian 724:Poromenos 708:Edwardian 387:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3144:Cheers.— 3008:Cheers.— 2545:unsigned 2519:unsigned 2493:unsigned 2466:unsigned 2430:Link to 2414:Silicone 2352:contribs 2340:unsigned 2320:contribs 2308:unsigned 2287:contribs 2275:unsigned 2228:unsigned 2101:WP:WIAGA 2059:Delisted 2023:contribs 2009:contribs 1995:contribs 1981:contribs 1908:unsigned 1886:unsigned 1862:unsigned 1535:unsigned 1519:BhaiSaab 1419:Joncnunn 1405:Joncnunn 1393:clear?-- 1323:Dansiman 1258:MartinRe 1141:MartinRe 1006:article. 864:this one 858:Pictures 782:section. 664:Done -- 607:History 483:Medicine 418:Medicine 330:Delisted 209:Archives 178:Springer 143:Cochrane 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3042:my edit 2922:my edit 2630:, is a 2628:contact 2344:MSsippy 2209:WP:LOTM 2175:WP:LOTM 2084:WP:LOTM 2048:WP:LOTM 1556:Collabi 1468:Glasses 1428:Diopter 1110:Rewster 973:Perspex 962:Perspex 743:Cleanup 666:Kaszeta 656:Joeljkp 594:refresh 582:history 510:on the 389:B-class 289:Process 2900:Garvin 2825:Garvin 2769:Kiatdd 2739:Kiatdd 2569:myopia 2448:Garvin 2421:Garvin 2405:Garvin 2385:Garvin 2367:Garvin 2114:WP:ALT 1636:Kanhef 1480:Kslays 1443:Kslays 1333:Natebw 1302:Natebw 1241:Natebw 1211:Natebw 1177:sclera 1158:Joyous 1090:Joyous 1079:Natebw 927:Joyous 918:Natebw 900:Joyous 882:Fenice 868:Joyous 850:Natebw 840:Natebw 829:Wiki-p 794:Natebw 774:Fenice 764:Natebw 732:Done. 615:Garvin 395:scale. 311:Listed 292:Result 166:OpenMD 136:PubMed 3205:Usage 2812:edema 2700:|ans= 2690:This 2610:|ans= 2600:This 2116:text. 1985:BillC 1956:from 1292:BillC 1225:BillC 1196:BillC 1192:shape 1043:BillC 749:Jackk 684:Henna 588:watch 376:This 192:Wiley 84:Seek 3240:talk 3221:talk 3195:talk 3176:talk 2773:talk 2759:talk 2743:talk 2727:talk 2712:Hi, 2640:talk 2632:lens 2577:talk 2553:talk 2527:talk 2501:talk 2474:talk 2348:talk 2316:talk 2283:talk 2257:talk 2236:talk 2148:See 2017:talk 2003:talk 1989:talk 1975:talk 1937:talk 1916:talk 1894:talk 1870:talk 1826:PCPP 1802:talk 1787:talk 1770:talk 1744:talk 1722:talk 1695:talk 1674:talk 1659:talk 1640:talk 1591:Talk 1543:talk 1430:vs. 1378:is. 1272:talk 1162:Talk 1094:Talk 950:talk 931:Talk 904:Talk 895:look 872:Talk 576:edit 568:for 286:Date 185:Trip 159:Gale 151:DOAJ 73:and 3112:RfC 3082:to 3072:to 3056:to 2976:RfC 2946:to 2936:to 2698:or 2659:and 2608:or 2201:bio 2167:bio 2076:bio 2040:bio 2025:)-- 2013:AED 2011:), 1997:), 1983:), 1971:EdC 1818:HUD 1503:Jon 1489:Jon 866:. 502:Mid 199:TWL 3254:: 3242:) 3223:) 3197:) 3189:. 3178:) 3125:. 3120:}} 3116:{{ 2989:. 2984:}} 2980:{{ 2880:). 2775:) 2761:) 2745:) 2729:) 2704:no 2642:) 2622:A 2614:no 2579:) 2555:) 2529:) 2503:) 2476:) 2354:) 2350:• 2322:) 2318:• 2289:) 2285:• 2259:) 2238:) 2211:) 2177:) 2086:) 2061:-- 2050:) 1969:, 1939:) 1918:) 1896:) 1872:) 1833:66 1804:) 1789:) 1772:) 1746:) 1738:. 1724:) 1697:) 1676:) 1661:) 1642:) 1593:) 1545:) 1474:, 1470:, 1466:, 1462:, 1274:) 1160:| 1092:| 1033:A 952:) 929:| 902:| 870:| 834:) 762:-- 538:). 421:: 54:; 3238:( 3219:( 3193:( 3174:( 3157:) 3153:( 3140:. 3133:. 3021:) 3017:( 3004:. 2997:. 2771:( 2757:( 2741:( 2725:( 2638:( 2575:( 2551:( 2525:( 2499:( 2472:( 2346:( 2314:( 2281:( 2255:( 2234:( 2207:/ 2203:/ 2199:/ 2197:c 2195:/ 2193:t 2191:( 2173:/ 2169:/ 2165:/ 2163:c 2161:/ 2159:t 2157:( 2082:/ 2078:/ 2074:/ 2072:c 2070:/ 2068:t 2066:( 2046:/ 2042:/ 2038:/ 2036:c 2034:/ 2032:t 2030:( 2020:· 2015:( 2006:· 2001:( 1992:· 1987:( 1978:· 1973:( 1935:( 1914:( 1892:( 1868:( 1800:( 1785:( 1768:( 1742:( 1720:( 1693:( 1672:( 1657:( 1638:( 1589:( 1549:. 1541:( 1270:( 1183:. 948:( 597:· 591:· 585:· 579:· 572:: 514:. 480:. 401:: 214:1 211:: 195:· 189:· 181:· 175:· 169:· 163:· 155:· 147:· 139:· 133:· 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index