74:
53:
22:
261:
receiving these services? The citation style needs to be redone, ours can be used as an example for this. Also, Emily's sources need to be added to the Child Care section. Obviously, a graphic is still needed and the 2 sections with subsections have been discussed with
Desmond Patton as sufficient to fulfill the 3 section criteria.
272:
I really like the quality of the examples you used throughout this article. When you add the sources to the final section, you might want to look at the voice used and add some "studies suggest", "according to..." or things like that to make it less subjective. I'm sure that will sort itself out when
260:
In the first sentence a rephrasing that is more analytical would be helpful. Stating "Studies show..." could be useful. Potentially adding limitations and criticisms to either section (use existing resources). I'm really just curious, when you say low-income families, are those the only families
193:
Myself and another
University of Michigan student, both MSW candidates, are planning to edit the Child Care Debate section, and add a section about Two Generation Family Services. This is part of a class assignment, and changes will be posted by the beginning of April. Here is a link to our
163:
Seriously, this article is a complete mess. It's tagged for a rewrite, but I don't think even that will help. What the hell are we re-writing about? To paraphrase an infamous
Vietnam quote, we may need to delete this article to save it.
228:
After research my group member and I determined that this section was lacking factual information. We plan to replace the whole section with facts about childcare.
348:
114:
124:
313:
This article does not say one thing about the topic header thats even remotely close having any credible worth. It should be removed immidieatly
90:
343:
320:
81:
58:
297:
244:
212:
33:
324:
175:
266:
39:
278:
150:
316:
285:
232:
200:
21:
289:
236:
204:
89:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
293:
240:
208:
165:
73:
52:
273:
the citations are added to that section but I'd imagine the 'wiki-bots' might appreciate it.
262:
328:
301:
248:
216:
180:
337:
274:
86:
146:
i was wanting to know about non reunifcation cases and can they be reversed
256:
Peer review and responses during the educational assignment in Winter 2015
309:
This article has no real or factual information needs to be deleted
15:
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
149:The preceding unsigned comment was added by
314:
47:
49:
19:
224:Deleting the Child Care Debate Section
7:
349:High-importance Social work articles
79:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
196:] feel free to give us feedback.
14:
99:Knowledge:WikiProject Social Work
102:Template:WikiProject Social Work
72:
51:
20:
119:This article has been rated as
181:19:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
329:15:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
249:15:11, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
217:22:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
93:and see a list of open tasks.
344:C-Class Social work articles
365:
302:04:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
159:Can this article be saved?
125:project's importance scale
118:
67:
46:
82:WikiProject Social Work
153:on 19:00, 15 July 2008
28:This article is rated
105:Social work articles
34:content assessment
331:
319:comment added by
305:
288:comment added by
252:
235:comment added by
220:
203:comment added by
173:
155:
142:Non-reunification
139:
138:
135:
134:
131:
130:
356:
304:
282:
251:
229:
219:
197:
178:
171:
170:
151:User:97.89.24.95
147:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
364:
363:
359:
358:
357:
355:
354:
353:
334:
333:
311:
283:
258:
230:
226:
198:
191:
176:
166:
161:
144:
121:High-importance
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
62:High‑importance
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
362:
360:
352:
351:
346:
336:
335:
321:50.141.118.182
310:
307:
257:
254:
225:
222:
190:
187:
185:
160:
157:
143:
140:
137:
136:
133:
132:
129:
128:
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
361:
350:
347:
345:
342:
341:
339:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
308:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
280:
276:
270:
268:
264:
255:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
223:
221:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
195:
188:
186:
183:
182:
179:
174:
169:
158:
156:
154:
152:
141:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
315:— Preceding
312:
284:— Preceding
271:
259:
231:— Preceding
227:
199:— Preceding
192:
184:
167:
162:
148:
145:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
96:Social Work
87:Social Work
59:Social Work
338:Categories
177:Talk to me
263:Mephilton
189:New Edits
168:DÂ OÂ NÂ DÂ E
317:unsigned
298:contribs
290:Cakingry
286:unsigned
245:contribs
237:Cakingry
233:unsigned
213:contribs
205:Cakingry
201:unsigned
194:sandbox
172:groovily
275:Mgs6876
123:on the
30:C-class
36:scale.
325:talk
294:talk
279:talk
267:talk
241:talk
209:talk
115:High
281:)
340::
327:)
300:)
296:•
269:)
247:)
243:•
215:)
211:•
323:(
292:(
277:(
265:(
239:(
207:(
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
