Talk:Christendom/Archive 1

2160:

or Christianity discernible to a general historian is the urge to conquer China (see Goths in England by Samuel Kliger, whose point I've taken and advanced a few hundred yards). That is, the "global war on terror" and the (fading?) urge to conquer China probably exist, in this market age, as a skeleton of a Constantinian Christendom composed of hypocrisy, "concern", and servile careerism. "Well, once we invade the place, we can decide how to set it to rights." As it were. Hemingway's Old Man and the Sea seems to be a metaphor for the divine fisherman failing to land the big fish: the human race. If the fish were a shark, as Hemingway probably would have preferred to talk about--that is, if Christianity were for the most part a predatory thing, in its historical realization in western Europe (east-European/Asian Christianity seems rather charming in its feebleness, albeit "Slavs" are called that because the Byzantines liked them as slaves), it complicates the metaphor but it makes a better story. Let me run with it. The old man catches Jaws and ties it to his boat. A bunch of tuna come along, no. A bunch of vacationing professors come along and deplore the loss of the habitat's natural order. The fisherman releases Jaws and it sinks the excursion boat and eats all the professors. No, that's not it. How about the vine metaphor? Is it a recipe for sociopathy? These two sociopaths meet on a path in the forest and one says to the other, "Let me be your friend." Supply your own punchline. We cannot see Christianity because, aside from Constantine, it got gobbled up by Germanic culture when the two collided, replacing the ur-democratic spirit of the latter (we're all free here in the Folksgemot, the "thing", except for the slaves) with a grand vision (Kliger) of a depraved structure best termed Vikingdom: raiderdom. Hans-Peter Hasenfratz, Barbarian Rites, which opens with Ambassador Fadhlan's encounter with Vikings in Ukraine about the time they'd set up Rus. A disgusting description of a dinner party. And to show the relevance of that, consider Eaters of the Dead, by Michael Crichton, which takes that same account and fictionalizes it in a way so as to leave you unsure if Fadhlan existed and to otherwise dismiss any bad stuff about Vikingdom as squeamishness. Whereas Hasenfratz more or less says he finds the origins of Naziism in these philological ruminations about Icelandic eddas, etc. "Armies of the night". A social order turned into a social disorder which only sustained itself by steadily expanding until it ran into itself. I might justify that last claim by two examples today: Trump's spurious (in my view, compared to Obama's TPP, which was deadly serious in its predatory attitude to China: it excluded China, the FT said it was to "weaken and isolate" China, and the FT then quoted Obama, "Why should China make the rules? We should make the rules.") attacks on China and Iran are being held at bay by western Europe and indeed by a global culture which is not, as a Sudanese lawyer said twenty years ago or so in Maine, the NYC-DC beltway but the people who'd gone to his lecture in Maine on that evening: the international community is not another name for Christendom but is rather its successor: imagine Kafka revisiting the castle after it has been turned into a Disneyland attraction. He says to the concession worker, "Twelve euros for a box of popcorn?" and the young Turk says, "Do you want it or not?" The other sociopath takes the first sociopath by the arm and says, "Hush."

543:

within the empire for a long time and dominated the German Christians for even longer). As Christianity grew in importance "orthodox Christianity" and "Romanity" came to be thought of as being two sides of the same coin. And as Roman high culture developed, orthodox Christianity, Romanity, and civilization came to be though of as one and the same (i.e. in contrast to the barbarian tribes some of which claimed to be Christian but were considered heretics). After the Western Empire declined the Western descendants of the Romans clung to the Church as their last remaining link to civilization (a.k.a Romanity a.k.a. Christianity; note that they distinguished between the orthodox Christianity of the Empire and the Arian Christianity of some of their conquerors). The Easterners contrasted themselves to the poor Western wretches who were now far away from Romanity/Christanity/civilization. Before and after the fall of Rome, some barbarian tribes, notably the Franks, converted to orthodox Christianity with the intent of becoming associated with this civilized identity. And, of course, when the Pope crowned Charlemagne the Franks enjoyed the (disputed) prestige of being called Romans/Christians/civilized people.

2088:

Theodosius I in 380. Likewise, the experts appear to agree that Christendom no longer exists, because in the past c. 250 years after the French Revolution, nearly all countries in the world have abolished Christianity as their state religion. This is important, because wherever we'd use a definition of 'Christendom', such as 'the worldwide community of Christians' or 'the sum of Christian-majority countries', then obviously Christendom still exists. This would make it hard to write a story in which the term plays a central role without producing odd and contradictory sentences. A story about a political system should not pay attention to Christian music and the like; unless it refers to that political system, it is irrelevant here, and would be better placed in the article on Christianity. We should start from well-sourced definitions, then proceed to write a text based on reliable sources that actually mention the word 'Christendom' (or clearly imply it), and then remove anything that is wrong or doesn't fit, otherwise it becomes a mess.

208:

was a term with precisely the same connotation (Corpus Christianus is not quite the same). Regardless, the Romans had essentially the same attitude about it before and after the fall of Rome (i.e. the Classical Roman Empire vs the Byzantines). The Roman Empire was the "real" Christendom but the kingdoms outside the empire that were in communion with the Roman Church (i.e. not "heretical") were part of greater Christendom. When the West fell the Easterners gradually looked at the Westerners as being on the fringe and so gradually considered them less and less part of "real" Christendom. Then when the Franks took over Rome their respect for them went down even more (reflected in the fact that, even today, Greeks sometimes call Roman Catholics

1680: 31: 144:

Christian kingdoms outside of it were sometimes thought of as part of it but not necessarily. To say that Christendom gained a concrete meaning for the first time with Charlemagne is fabrication. What is true is that for a few centuries in between Roman Rule and Frankish (i.e. Holy Roman) rule Western Europe lacked a strong Christian state and so perceived Charlemagne as re-establishing Christendom in their world.

2058:

readers. A lot of people appear to think they know what the term means and then go on to write a lot of information without referencing any reliable source. What we need is reference works, professional literature, which confirms the asserted definitions; and we should remove everything that is incorrect. Next, we're able to tell something about the history of the term, and the history of the phenomenon.

600:

The Biblical Science section is not only partially incoherent, but hopelessly POV. I suggest it be deleted or completely revised. The tone is bizarre and inappropriate; it seems like a paean to theological modernism or something - heck if I can figure it out - but someone needs to take a look at it.

542:

There is an interesting aspect to how Christendom was thought of in most of the Christian realms historically. As Christianity developed in the Empire there was a separation created between "orthodox" Christianity and "heresy" (the original largest component of the heresy being Arianism which existed

472:

This article mistakenly states that Christianity became the state religion of the Roman Empire in 325 in the following paragraph: "The seeds of Christendom were laid in A.D. 306, when Emperor Constantine became co-ruler of the Roman Empire. In 312 he converted to Christianity, and in 325 Christianity

390:

I had a vague recollection that they might not be exactly synonymous, but I reckoned that putting up a redirect from the non-existant link I found would at least make someone who knew better react. That seems to have succeeded. Now, the question is why you put the explanation here and not on the main

207:

The East had the same type of concept but I do not know enough about Greek to know what term existed or whether it was ever expressed with such a succint term. Remember, though, that Christendom is an English word that does not derive from Latin or Greek. So I am not clear that even in the West there

476:

In reality, 325 is the date for the council of Nicaea, and 392 is the appropriate date for the declaration of Christianity as the sole state religion of Rome, under Thodosius I. I am cautious about changing this, as I do not have an external source from which to back this, save the Wikepedia article

187:

I also wonder about the East-West thing. I would imagine that even the West considered the East to be part of Christendom. After all, the Crusades were putatively about regaining the Holy Land for Christendom, right? Now, did the East have this concept of Christendom? Is there a Greek equivalent

147:

Regardless, though, the majority of Christians were outside of Charlemagne's empire at the time he was crowned so to argue that his empire was seen generally as "Christendom" is silly. In reality at that time if you took a survey of Christians around the world at that time and asked where the center

2159:

I'm afraid Wiki is up against its own limits, as to Professional sources and all that, which might mean someone's pet professor. Do you recall the Vietnam War: KKK was behind it, I was told at the time: Killing a Kommie for Khrist. It may be that the only thing that remains of either Christendom

2115:

Again, time after time, editors insist in bringing in their favorite university proffesor or book author as an authoritative figure for an important article. Christendom is a concept that defines a period in history and a group of people far too large to quote individuals with no trscendece in that

2095:

had/has many of the same problems this article has: no clear definitions, no reliable sources, people assuming their own definitions and adding statements that aren't relevant and often not even true. This is English Knowledge, we have a high standard of quality to live up to, let's fix this entry!

460:

as the part of Christendom that acknowledges Jesus Christ is fully God and man, died and physically resurrected, and more importantly, all true Christians which is defined as those who have acknowledged Jesus died for their sins on their behalf and the resurrection points to overcoming the wages of

349:

The concepts of "Christendom" being discussed on this page are two clearly different concepts - that of an historical polity and that of a contemporary sense of the spread of "Christianity". Might I suggest that it be broken into two separate pages and a disambiguation page be created? Since most

2061:

What I gather from the accessible professional literature on the topic, especially Hall (1997), Curry (2001) and MacCulloch (2010), is that 'Christendom' was a geopolical system, a community/collective of states which recognised Christianity as the state religion, and the governments protected and

707:

Quotation: "In the late Victorian period it was common to write about the ‘warfare between science and religion’ and to presume that the two bodies of culture must always have been in conflict. However, it is a very long time since these attitudes have been held by historians of science". (p. 195)

437:

Just an example: Christ forbid the usage of titles like Father (Mt 23). How can one reconcile this with the practice in most churches/groups? So there is a difference between Christendom and Christianity. Needless to say that there is a huge overlap in the two concepts, and it's hard to say which

433:

and how this is reflected in his/her actions and has a more eternal nature to it: Walking The Way, believing The Truth and being in The Life so to say. Every christian needs to define this for themselves and any description here can be only very general: the life of Christ, the apostels, and maybe

143:

This is ridiculous. Certainly the Roman Catholic Church has to some extent painted history this way but this has certainly never been the general view of the Christian community nor is it a scholarly view. Within the Roman Empire Christendom had been seen as the Roman Empire to a great degree. The

1119:

I don't think it really has all that much to do with Christendom anyway. I would prefer the article focus more on Christendom in the middle ages. After that, it was more of a redefining of the term. I just haven't had a lot of extra time to work on it lately, and this article needs a lot of work.

181:

I agree. I've tried to address some of the obvious problems but, frankly, this is not an area that I know a lot about. Since when was the Holy Roman Empire equated with being all of Christendom? I think it may have been envisioned (by some!) as the embodiment of the theocracy envisioned by the

2057:

presently do. However, that means the word must only be used in that sense in the Etymology section. Furthermore, different meanings of Christendom (e.g. the political system vs. the worldwide community of Christians) appear to be used throughout the story; we can't have that, this confuses the

212:, Franks, implying that they are not real Christians). In general it was one of those things where, if it is discussing of Christians among Christians then it was "you guys are not real Christians." But if it was Christians talking about Muslims then suddenly they were all brothers in Christ. 2087:

These experts agree that Christendom emerged in the 4th century as a result of the institutionalisation of Christianity, especially by Roman emperor Constantine I through the Edict of Milaan (313) and the Council of Nicaea (325), and moreover by its establishment as state religion by emperor

1042:

viewpoint of the period, regarding what they believed the church,church polity, and the church's relation to state governments should be. Christendom was a form Christianity took at a particular period of time, and some believe it should take again, but it is not the same as Christianity.

376:"Christendom" isn't really congruent with "Christianity". It was a medieval concept meaning "The collective society of the portion of the world where Christianity holds sway". It's kind of like how "The First World" is used to refer to the grouping of the U.S., Western Europe, and so on. 2116:

history or in that group. His remarks could be used but not stating his name as it would imply some degree of relevance. Name explictly Augustine, Aquinas, or some modern acclaimed theologian as John of the Cross or Teresa of Avila not some unknown proffesor in some University.

332:

I just tagged several lines in particular that need referencing. I also tagged the entire article for sourcing - there is no reference section at all at this point. The burden to provide sources falls on the primary editors who add the content. Please cite your work!

690:

Quotation: "The conflict thesis, at least in its simple form, is now widely perceived as a wholly inadequate intellectual framework within which to construct a sensible and realistic historiography of Western science". (p. 7), Colin A. Russell "The Conflict Thesis",

550:

Christendom can be seen as expressing a sociopolitical identity associated with Roman culture that was only loosely connected to religious ferver. Although no one in the Middle Ages would have ever said such a thing it is arguably not an incorrect perspective on

1755:

First of all, in the image's talkpage it says "this is not a place to request for corrections, try the talk page of an article that the image is used in". Further, at least I believe Netherlands, Estonia, Czech Republic and Tanzania should all become purple.

1643:

during the 4th to 13th centuries, it makes sense to talk of "Christendom", but only in retrospect. During this time, the term did not exist, as it was clear that the notion "the worldwide Christian polity" already had a name, and that name was "the Roman

398:

Because I'm one of the folks who disagrees with the "Write stub articles" rule. I would have to have something longer and better researched -- my current research consists of some dusty old neurons firing -- before I would put it anywhere but /Talk. --

1838:. The T&O map says "Mare magnum fiue"? Maremagnum is the Great Sea. Normally that would be the Atlantic, except the Atlantic is west of Europe and Africa. The map also has descriptors for the continents, looks like Sem, Cham, and Iafeth. Cham is 1798:. We have the then known three land masses: Asia, Europa, and Africa. Europe and Africa are separated by the Mediterraneum, and Africa is south and Europe is north. What separates Africa and Europe from Asia to the East? Today one would say the 422:

is the whole of all organized systems and groups which claim to be Christian. They come and go though-out history. Christianity may even disappear someday. Any description of it needs to be historical and is dependent on the time when written.

810:

As to this particular portion, it should be there ... but as to allowing info about religion and science in pertinent articles is removed by atheists and those that disapprove of religious information, only weaken Knowledge. Sad really.

1073:

The previously-linked online version of the Catholic Encyclopedia (useful for Catholic theology) deals with some of this. I don't have some of my textbooks that went over this handy, but I can pull some stuff out when I have some time.

660:, "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." A century-old and long-discredited "theory" would certainly seem to come under that heading. 981:

Along these lines, could somebody tell me why the passage on the fall of the Byzantine Empire is sourced to 'The Greek Testament with the Readings Adopted by the Revisers of the Authorized Version' published in 1881?

1099:

Who exactly authorised the Prayer Foundation to speak for "all of Christendom"? This appears to be an obscure, self-published source, misrepresented to indicate that "all of Christendom" accepts and uses this flag.

203:

Yeah, certainly there were mixed views at different times about what was truly Christendom and what was not. To a certain degree it would depend on whether you talked to the bishops or the emperors or the nobility.

182:

term Christendom but I doubt that those outside the HRE considered themselves to be outside of Christendom. I've tried to move the text in this direction but I'm not convinced that I've made it all the way there.

956:

I would tend to agree. My recommendation would be (i) eliminate the dodgy/unsourced material (ii) merge anything useful that remains that isn't duplicative to appropriate articles & then (iii) redirect to

2139:(who is clearly not "unknown" as there's a bloody article about him) is a professional whose job is (as far as Knowledge is concerned and put overly simply) to summarize the history of Christian doctrine. 2076:

is "the system dating from the fourth century by which governments upheld and promoted Christianity." Thomas John Curry (2001). Also: governments "uphold the teachings, customs, ethos, and practice of

148:

of Christendom was the majority would have said Constantinople (including many Christians in the West). Obviously by the mid second millenium Constantinople's standing had deteriorated dramatically.

546:

So there would be two points that might be interesting to bring out if someone has a good reference to base this on (i.e. my understanding is limited so I can't say that my facts are 100% correct).

252:

No, your edit looks fine. As I said, this is not an area in which I know a lot. I think it looks much better now than when we started. Are you satisfied or do you think more needs to be done?

1623:

The term of "Christendom" has its limits of useful applicability, which is what makes any term meaningful in the first place. It is a bad idea to push these limits out of a misguided desire to

108:] -- none of which seemingly defines it. (Yes, I understand perfectly well the meanings of the terms "Jesus of Nazareth" and "Christ", but something particular is apparently meant here.) 1292:

I'll removing the hat-tag to the section here after a bit. The PD material can be reliable. And I don't just use PD material. Please don't edit to some point you are trying to prove. --

1657:

From this it follows that the entire sections on "Demographics" (i.e. "current") and "Major Christian denominations" and "Christendom and other beliefs" are misplaced on this page. --

1531:. The alternative to these conventions is to have articles heavily citation-bombed and tag-bombed. If you meant that the citation was only for the last sentence, then you should have 1653:

it is not now a term that can be used to describe "the predominantly Christian countries". Such countries would now simply be described as, well, "predominantly Christian countries"

350:

links from other pages are in the context of the historical polity, perhaps this page ought to be named "Christendom" with the other pages named "Christendom (contemporary)"? --

116:

the Social Reign of Christ the King." -- "Include" probably isn't the right word there, but I'd like to clearly understand the rest of the sentence before I do anything with it.

1513:

The convention in Knowledge is that citations are assumed to cover all material back to either (i) the last citation, (ii) the last tag or (iii) the start of the paragraph. The

636:

Being referenced is hardly reason enough not to remove it - a statement over a century old about a 'new race of biblical scholars' is a bit of a clue that there's a problem.

539:

I don't have a lot of specific knowledge on this (i.e. I couldn't explicitly name an authoritative resource) but I'm curious if somebody out there has a good reference ...

1000:

This article should not be merged and redirected. Christendom is an ecclesiological viewpoint, which was a major part of the definition of the church in the middle ages.

215:

Regardless, though, the point is that the view that HRE was uniquely Christendom was no more universal than the view that the Byzantine Empire was uniquely Christendom.

227:

OK... so what do you think of the edits that I made to the article earlier today? Is it a step in the right direction? What do we need to do in order to improve it?

831:

in my considered opinion, the thing Reddi is fond of is really putting his tongue in cheek and exasperating Wikipedians with eccentric behaviour. Just my theory. --

2037:

As you may have noticed, I've taken up the task to rewrite this article in order to improve its quality. First and foremost, we must be clear about what the word

1977: 1973: 1959: 1794:. Oriens is East, Occidens is West, Septentris is North, Meridies is South. Mare Oceanun is literally the "Sea of Ocean", the sea that surrounds the world. See 2155:

I sympathize with the current state of the article, August '19, but also credit "rewrite's" charge of ambiguity: ecclesiastical versus imperial Christianity/

1202:

They can be reliable, but why use them? They can also be extremely wrong. Hrafn is right. I have never understood your fondness for 19th century sources.

130:

The "Christendom as a polity" section contains a lot of, at best, POV, and, at worst, untrue statements regarding the historical concept of Christendom.

1686:

includes Madagasgar and South Sudan, neither of which have a Christian majority. Prompt removal of these countries would be much appreciated. Thanks. --

1020:, which covers the religion's geographic spread (and at times contraction) over time. I still see no room for a separate topic on 'Christendom'. 886:, etc. What is this even doing here? The only thing that is on topic here is the "terminology" section, and possibly part of the "history" one. -- 803:

scholars not just 'popular scholars' ... and very little useful knowledge is new. But, have to know history to know that. And I improved the

882:

topics. Nothing that doesn't have its own obsessively detailed article already. I mean, "Christendom and other beliefs" is just a clone of

1012:

The OED certainly treats 'Christendom' and 'Christianity' mainly as close synonyms. One non-overlapping definition, which is the one that

1885: 1757: 608: 461:

sin, that they accept Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Saviour (i.e. the whole definition of what an evangelical Christian is).--

74:"Sometimes the word Christendom refers to Catholic nations that include the Social Reign of Christ the King." -- What does this mean? 2117: 1863: 1776: 1702: 1687: 1650:

during the 18th to 20th centuries, the term becomes an anachronism, and increasingly falls out of use other than in a historical sense

686:, which concludes: "White's conflict thesis has, however, been discredited by contemporary historians of science." For this it cites: 581: 520: 699: 165:

was a much bigger deal in the Christian world than the Protestant Reformation. And those two weren't the only significant schisms.

322:

section. Surely there must be a multitude of scholarly works which address the subject of "Christendom" from various viewpoints.

1731: 883: 601:

I mean... "new race of Biblical scholars"? Seriously? And check out those footnotes... Yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and delete this.

83: 1716:

The image also has its own talkpage. Nobody is even going to see your input if you place it on some random article talkpage. --

1925: 239:

Rather than going back and forth on this discussion I just took a stab at editing the text. Feel free to modify as you like.

2045:, which it isn't. It's possible, as the text claims so far (without a source, however), that the original Anglo-Saxon word 1385:

BTW, it has nothing to do with Leo or bastions ... are you going to tag every sentence in this article? Please don't ... --

750:

I agree that this material has no place on the page until someone can find a current, mainstream source in support of it.

2154: 2020: 1417:, the concept of Christendom changed as the western church became independent of the Emperor and the Christians of the 519:

Looks more like it was the other way around, as the link cited above has features associated with a wikipedia article.

2101: 1560: 1492: 1406: 1395: 1353: 1274: 1166: 1107: 1062: 1027: 989: 968: 939: 738: 667: 1823: 554:

The concept of Christendom to some degree seems to have been used to distinguish between orthodoxy and non-orthodoxy.

93: 568:

The notion that "Christian culture" is "Roman culture" is really a modern "romantic" notion. Europe declined in its

138:

Christendom was given a firmer meaning with the creation of Charlemagne's kingdom, the Christian Empire of the West.

1577:

The source it doesn't say that the number of christians is 1.5 billion, There are many sources as CIA world facts.

38: 379:

I think there are salient things to say about it as a historical concept that don't fall under the purview of the

2041:

actually means before we start using it. It looks like that until now, some have used it as merely a synonym for

1976:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1589:, say that there are more than 2.18 billion Christians around the world, i think we have to change the numbers. 103: 1177:

I haven't had time to look at it. But removed it entirely. Will look through it and see if it's applicable. --

773:

Redding originally put it there. I don't understand why he is so fond of 19th and early 20th century sources.

1889: 1761: 612: 2121: 2011: 1917: 1867: 1706: 1691: 1617: 1613: 1017: 585: 524: 1578: 2165: 2097: 1780: 359: 2144: 1995:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1983: 439: 2161: 1916:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 296: 493: 482: 1950: 1881: 1636:

The precise limits need of course to be negotiated (based on academic sources), but the gist is that

1418: 1403: 1207: 1016:

takes, of "the part of the world which is inhabited by Christians", appears to be already covered by

778: 683: 641: 604: 364: 2169: 1739: 1721: 1662: 1586: 1503:

But the source is NOT for the whole paragraph. It's for the sentence that it attached to. Idiocy.--

1434: 1324: 891: 836: 504:

The article on Christendom is lifted whole and uncredited from this, which is credited and signed:

478: 89: 1640:

there was no "Christendom" as opposed to "the Church" or "Christianity" prior to the 4th century.

1627: 1458: 1328: 757: 720: 718:

Quotation: "In its traditional forms, the conflict thesis has been largely discredited." (p. 42)

351: 117: 2070:

means literally the dominion or sovereignty of the Christian religion." Douglas John Hall (1997)

1980:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1647:

during the 14th to 17th centuries, the term did exist, and its application makes excellent sense

1582: 1996: 1679: 2136: 2132: 1839: 1452: 1187: 1121: 1075: 1044: 1004: 904: 696: 323: 256: 231: 194: 2140: 1878:

The text in the middle is "Mare magnum sive mediterraneum," meaning "great or inland sea."

1424: 1317: 1038:

While there is some overlap with the period, it is not the same thing. It was the dominant

573: 392: 292: 162: 47: 17: 2003: 1926:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080511204430/http://www.centreforcitizenship.org/church1.html

1701:

The image still deceptively includes South Sudan, a country without a Christian majority.--

1815: 1594: 1550: 1203: 929: 878:...what is the scope of this article again? It looks like a random collection of assorted 774: 637: 99: 1003:

The article could use a bit of work, and a lot cut out, but it should not be eliminated.

416:

The word itself is also used to signify "living as christ" or "living as a christian".

1962:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1835: 1791: 1735: 1717: 1658: 1444: 1414: 1141:

The Greek Testament with the Readings Adopted by the Revisers of the Authorized Version

887: 832: 400: 384: 79: 2049:

did indeed mean what we now call Christianity (i.e. the Christian religion), as Dutch

2002:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1608:

People who are active here need to take great care that this does not become another

1539: 1517: 1225: 751: 657: 559: 510: 334: 305: 266: 243: 219: 172: 924:

Except we already have an appropriate, and far better sourced, 'summary' article --

2092: 2042: 1929: 1799: 1609: 1440: 1311: 1259: 1052: 1039: 958: 925: 879: 380: 288: 2083:

is "the union between Christianity and secular power." Diarmaid MacCulloch (2010)

2148: 2125: 2105: 2025: 1969: 1909: 1893: 1871: 1827: 1784: 1765: 1743: 1734:, which shows both Madagascar and South Sudan as having a Christian majority. -- 1725: 1710: 1695: 1666: 1598: 1566: 1507: 1498: 1448: 1389: 1380: 1359: 1296: 1280: 1232: 1211: 1194: 1181: 1172: 1124: 1113: 1078: 1068: 1055:

for this? Let alone the "significant coverage" necessary to sustain an article.

1047: 1033: 1007: 995: 974: 945: 911: 895: 861: 840: 782: 761: 744: 673: 645: 627: 616: 589: 577: 569: 562: 528: 513: 489: 465: 442: 410: 368: 338: 326: 308: 299: 269: 259: 246: 234: 222: 197: 175: 156:

Christendom as a cohesive political unit effectively ended with the Reformation.

120: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1968:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1831: 1811: 1807: 1590: 1585:(Encyclopedia Britannica) and the last study of pew report about christianity 1556: 1504: 1488: 1386: 1377: 1349: 1293: 1270: 1229: 1191: 1178: 1162: 1103: 1058: 1023: 985: 964: 935: 908: 858: 812: 734: 663: 624: 438:

feature belongs to which without starting an edit-war between ideologies. --

1775:

Can anyone translate the writing on the t&o map at the top of the page???

1013: 1819: 1410: 1339: 928:, which this page was originally simply a redirect to. This appears to be a 1851: 1749: 1451:, the king of the Franks, as the Emperor of what came to be known as the 1433:, a Germanic tribe who converted to the Christian faith and entered into 462: 1579:

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html

1443:

made the fateful decision to switch his allegiance from the emperors in

1143:

have to do with the Byzantine Empire in the 7th through 13th centuries.

1859: 1847: 1843: 1803: 1795: 695:, Gary Ferngren, ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002. 1752:

Knowledge page. This image shows Tanzania as not having the majority.

1469:

Prominent mention of Leo and bastions, no mention (at that time) of "

1430: 492:

page, due to the fact that there was no feedback in the last 5 days.

1001: 1748:

Tanzania has a majority Christian population as referenced on the

1678: 1855: 1153:

reliable, given all the advances in scholarship in this period?

304:

Strike my previous commentary. I got my terminology confused. --

1587:

http://www.pewforum.org/Christian/Global-Christianity-exec.aspx

358:

Can someone help/explain to me how to clean up this vandalism?

25: 1583:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/115240/Christianity

1257:

to public domain, but rather requires it to restrict them to

1935:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

507:

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Corpus-christianum

1920:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1427:

came to see themselves as the last bastion of Christendom.

488:

I have gone ahead and made the appropriate changes to the

1346:

It therefore does not support the paragraph cited to it.

295:. I'm not sure if this is stated in the article or not. 1913: 1253:

public domain, it does not require it to restrict its

2062:

promoted it as such amongst their subjects/citizens:

1320:

seeing themselves as the last bastion of Christendom.

1249:

That's faulty logic. Knowledge policy requires it to

318:

I was surprised to see that the main article lacks a

1972:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1429:Christendom would take a turn with the rise of the 725:Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives 693:Science & Religion: A Historical Introduction 106:. The term is also mentioned on many other pages 1930:http://www.centreforcitizenship.org/church1.html 1400: 688: 1958:This message was posted before February 2018. 1186:BTW, 130yo sources can be reliable. Learn the 1323:Cannot be considered to state (without heavy 623:Do not remove referenced material. Thanks. -- 473:became the official religion of the Empire." 8: 2135:regarding historical Christian doctrines. 1465:in juxtaposition with the Byzantine Empire. 714:. University of Chicago Press Chicago, Ill. 1908:I have just modified one external link on 1879: 1553:and try to avoid such "idiocy" in future. 1483:yet another antiquated and outdated source 1477:respectively". I will note that you have 265:The POV concerns are addressed for me. -- 434:how the view on this changed with time? 1149:Why should we accept a 130yo source as 1398:! At the time I tagged it, it stated: 857:Thanks for the personal attack .... -- 168:On what basis was this stuff written? 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1947:to let others know (documentation at 1331:created an alternative definition of 799:Weller, It's called information from 429:is more the individual experience of 285:One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church 7: 1335:in contrast to the Byzantine Empire. 684:Andrew Dickson White#Conflict thesis 456:of your definition, while reserving 1527:paragraphs, as the paragraphs were 1523:-tags were certainly given for the 1481:corrected my third point and added 1267:century-old source to the article. 161:how can you possibly say that. The 1672:Christian Majority Countries image 1014:the Catholic Encyclopaedia article 291:, which is possibly rooted in the 24: 1912:. Please take a moment to review 1620:article. We already have those. 884:Christianity and other religions 126:Holy Roman Empire = Christendom? 84:Catholic_Church_(disambiguation) 29: 682:I direct editors' attention to 94:Social Reign of Christ the King 1471:distributed versus centralized 1370:distributed versus centralized 448:Evangelical Christians define 1: 2026:15:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC) 1872:19:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 1726:12:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC) 1667:12:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC) 1263:. Oh, and I see you've added 727:. Cambridge University Press. 590:21:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 535:"Roman" aspect of Christendom 529:21:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC) 369:12:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC) 327:18:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC) 2106:04:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC) 1785:21:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1766:10:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1599:14:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 1485:for the remaining material. 1224:One reason is that they are 1079:18:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1069:17:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1048:17:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1034:16:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 1008:16:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 996:03:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 975:18:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 946:12:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 912:11:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 896:18:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 862:11:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC) 841:18:42, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 783:17:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 762:16:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 745:14:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 674:14:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 646:13:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 628:06:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 617:03:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 443:08:43, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 406:I'll do some more reaserch. 70:Sentence needs clarification 2170:00:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC) 1894:14:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC) 1581:., and adherent's.come and 1316:Contains no mention of the 496:17:28 EST 16 November 2005 2185: 1989:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1905:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1730:also, the source cited is 1125:19:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 1114:05:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 500:Reference For This Article 121:20:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 2111:Who is Douglas John Hall? 1744:06:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC) 1711:10:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC) 1696:12:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 1439:On Christmas Day 800 AD, 712:The Scientific Revolution 283:probably begins with the 2149:19:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC) 2126:16:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC) 1567:09:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 1508:07:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 1499:04:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 1461:created a definition of 1390:19:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1381:19:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1360:18:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1297:07:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 1281:04:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 1233:20:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1212:20:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1195:19:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1182:19:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 1173:18:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 563:19:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 514:23:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 339:20:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC) 309:19:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 300:19:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 270:06:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 260:04:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 247:03:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC) 235:22:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 223:21:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 198:17:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 176:16:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC) 104:Feast of Christ the King 2131:Those sources would be 1901:External links modified 1618:Christianity by country 1614:history of Christianity 1310:Contains no mention of 1137:What the fracking hades 1018:History of Christianity 576:stood into the Western 466:02:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 112:"Catholic nations that 1824:Kuma–Manych Depression 1683: 1467: 730: 1682: 1155:MODERN SOURCE PLEASE! 367:comment was added at 42:of past discussions. 1970:regular verification 1573:Number of Christians 1419:Eastern Roman Empire 1404:Western Roman Empire 1396:WP:Complete bollocks 1338:Makes no mention of 1960:After February 2018 1939:parameter below to 1840:Ham the son of Noah 1435:communion with Rome 1306:Brown (2003) p443: 710:Shapin, S. (1996). 479:Christian Anarchism 133:Take the statement 2014:InternetArchiveBot 1965:InternetArchiveBot 1684: 1529:entirely unsourced 1459:Carolingian Empire 1329:Carolingian Empire 2137:Douglas John Hall 2098:Nederlandse Leeuw 1990: 1896: 1884:comment added by 1742: 1724: 1665: 1453:Holy Roman Empire 1188:historical method 1145:QUOTATION PLEASE! 894: 874:since we are here 839: 431:being a christian 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2176: 2091:PS: The article 2035:Dear colleagues, 2024: 2015: 1988: 1987: 1966: 1954: 1738: 1720: 1661: 1632: 1626: 1565: 1544: 1538: 1522: 1516: 1497: 1425:Byzantine Empire 1376:respectively. -- 1368:that there is a 1358: 1318:Byzantine Empire 1279: 1260:reliable sources 1171: 1112: 1067: 1032: 994: 973: 944: 890: 835: 754: 743: 728: 715: 672: 619: 607:comment added by 596:Biblical Science 574:Byzantine Empire 372: 345:Opening Comments 293:Great Commission 92:-- what's this? 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:Talk:Christendom 2184: 2183: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2157: 2133:primary sources 2113: 2033: 2018: 2013: 1981: 1974:have permission 1964: 1948: 1918:this simple FaQ 1903: 1816:Turkish Straits 1773: 1674: 1630: 1624: 1606: 1575: 1563: 1554: 1542: 1536: 1520: 1514: 1495: 1486: 1411:feudal kingdoms 1356: 1347: 1304: 1277: 1268: 1169: 1160: 1133: 1110: 1101: 1097: 1065: 1056: 1040:ecclesiological 1030: 1021: 992: 983: 971: 962: 942: 933: 876: 752: 741: 732: 719: 709: 670: 661: 602: 598: 537: 502: 362: 354:21 August 2012 347: 316: 277: 128: 100:Christ the King 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2182: 2180: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2112: 2109: 2085: 2084: 2078: 2077:Christianity." 2071: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2008: 2007: 2000: 1933: 1932: 1924:Added archive 1902: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1875: 1874: 1836:Ural Mountains 1792:Medieval Latin 1772: 1769: 1714: 1713: 1673: 1670: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1641: 1605: 1602: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1559: 1491: 1445:Constantinople 1415:principalities 1394: 1364:Wrong, states 1352: 1344: 1343: 1336: 1321: 1314: 1303: 1300: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1273: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1165: 1158: 1157: 1147: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1106: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1061: 1026: 988: 978: 977: 967: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 938: 917: 916: 915: 914: 875: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 808: 788: 787: 786: 785: 767: 765: 764: 737: 681: 679: 678: 677: 676: 666: 651: 650: 649: 648: 631: 630: 597: 594: 593: 592: 556: 555: 552: 536: 533: 532: 531: 501: 498: 486: 470: 469: 468: 414: 404: 396: 388: 375: 360:GarethChantler 356: 346: 343: 342: 341: 315: 312: 279:The notion of 276: 273: 263: 262: 253: 201: 200: 190: 189: 184: 183: 159: 158: 141: 140: 127: 124: 110: 109: 97: 87: 80:Roman Catholic 78:"Catholic" = " 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2181: 2172: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2110: 2108: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2094: 2089: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2030: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2017: 2016: 2005: 2001: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1985: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1961: 1956: 1952: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1906: 1900: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1886:24.130.188.90 1883: 1877: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1770: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1758:117.0.224.235 1753: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1681: 1677: 1671: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1634: 1629: 1621: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1604:Article scope 1603: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1548: 1541: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1519: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1506: 1505:J. D. Redding 1501: 1500: 1496: 1494: 1490: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1426: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1407:disintegrated 1405: 1399: 1397: 1392: 1391: 1388: 1387:J. D. Redding 1383: 1382: 1379: 1378:J. D. Redding 1375: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1355: 1351: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1301: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1294:J. D. Redding 1282: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1255:cited sources 1252: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1234: 1231: 1230:J. D. Redding 1227: 1226:public domain 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1192:J. D. Redding 1189: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1179:J. D. Redding 1175: 1174: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1123: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1109: 1105: 1094: 1080: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1031: 1029: 1025: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1002: 999: 998: 997: 993: 991: 987: 980: 979: 976: 972: 970: 966: 960: 955: 954: 947: 943: 941: 937: 931: 927: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 913: 910: 909:J. D. Redding 906: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 873: 863: 860: 859:J. D. Redding 856: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 842: 838: 834: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 814: 813:J. D. Redding 809: 806: 802: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 784: 780: 776: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 763: 759: 755: 749: 748: 747: 746: 742: 740: 736: 729: 726: 722: 716: 713: 705: 703: 701: 700:0-8018-7038-0 698: 694: 687: 685: 675: 671: 669: 665: 659: 655: 654: 653: 652: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 633: 632: 629: 626: 625:J. D. Redding 622: 621: 620: 618: 614: 610: 609:71.191.73.139 606: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 566: 565: 564: 561: 553: 549: 548: 547: 544: 540: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 515: 512: 508: 505: 499: 497: 495: 491: 485: 484: 480: 474: 467: 464: 459: 455: 452:as using the 451: 447: 446: 445: 444: 441: 440:194.159.73.69 435: 432: 428: 424: 421: 417: 413: 412: 407: 403: 402: 395: 394: 387: 386: 382: 377: 373: 370: 366: 361: 355: 353: 344: 340: 336: 331: 330: 329: 328: 325: 321: 313: 311: 310: 307: 302: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 274: 272: 271: 268: 261: 258: 254: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 240: 237: 236: 233: 228: 225: 224: 221: 216: 213: 211: 205: 199: 196: 192: 191: 186: 185: 180: 179: 178: 177: 174: 169: 166: 164: 157: 154: 153: 152: 149: 145: 139: 136: 135: 134: 131: 125: 123: 122: 119: 118:Writtenonsand 115: 107: 105: 102:redirects to 101: 98: 95: 91: 88: 85: 81: 77: 76: 75: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2162:Chrisrushlau 2158: 2118:186.86.30.35 2114: 2093:Muslim world 2090: 2086: 2080: 2073: 2067: 2060: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2043:Christianity 2038: 2034: 2012: 2009: 1984:source check 1963: 1957: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1934: 1907: 1904: 1880:— Preceding 1864:75.15.198.35 1846:. Iafeth is 1800:Indian Ocean 1777:67.76.13.166 1774: 1754: 1747: 1729: 1715: 1703:60.229.36.29 1688:60.229.36.29 1685: 1675: 1656: 1635: 1622: 1610:Christianity 1607: 1576: 1555: 1546: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1502: 1487: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473:Christendom 1470: 1468: 1462: 1447:and crowned 1441:Pope Leo III 1438: 1422: 1401: 1393: 1384: 1373: 1372:Christendom 1369: 1365: 1363: 1348: 1345: 1332: 1325:WP:Synthesis 1312:Pope Leo III 1305: 1302:Brown (2003) 1291: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1185: 1176: 1161: 1159: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131:Palmer, 1881 1122:Sχeptomaniac 1102: 1098: 1095:Flag section 1076:Sχeptomaniac 1057: 1045:Sχeptomaniac 1022: 1005:Sχeptomaniac 984: 963: 959:Christianity 934: 926:Christianity 880:Christianity 877: 804: 800: 766: 733: 731: 724: 721:Brooke, J.H. 717: 711: 706: 704: 692: 689: 680: 662: 656:Indeed. Per 599: 582:75.15.198.35 557: 545: 541: 538: 521:75.15.198.35 509: 506: 503: 487: 475: 471: 458:Christianity 457: 454:Christianity 453: 449: 436: 430: 426: 425: 420:Christianity 419: 418: 415: 408: 405: 397: 389: 381:Christianity 378: 374: 357: 348: 319: 317: 303: 297:75.14.223.27 289:Nicene Creed 284: 280: 278: 264: 241: 238: 229: 226: 217: 214: 209: 206: 202: 188:to the word? 170: 167: 163:Great Schism 160: 155: 150: 146: 142: 137: 132: 129: 113: 111: 90:Social Reign 73: 60: 43: 37: 2141:Ian.thomson 2081:Christendom 2074:Christendom 2068:Christendom 2055:Christentum 2053:and German 2051:christendom 2039:Christendom 1951:Sourcecheck 1910:Christendom 1828:Caspian Sea 1549:it. Have a 1463:Christendom 1449:Charlemagne 1333:Christendom 1327:) that the 1265:yet another 603:—Preceding 578:Renaissance 570:Middle Ages 494:Thebigcurve 490:Christendom 483:Thebigcurve 450:Christendom 427:Christendom 393:Pinkunicorn 363:—Preceding 281:Christendom 96:-- nothing. 82:" here? Or 36:This is an 2047:cristendom 2021:Report bug 1834:, and the 1832:Emba River 1812:Aegean Sea 1808:Suez Canal 1545:-tag, not 1204:Dougweller 905:WP:SUMMARY 775:Dougweller 638:Dougweller 572:, but the 383:entry. -- 320:references 314:References 151:Regarding 2004:this tool 1997:this tool 1854:. Sem is 1820:Black Sea 1676:The file 1628:globalize 1340:feudalism 401:Paul Drye 385:Paul Drye 61:Archive 1 2010:Cheers.— 1882:unsigned 1852:Japhetic 1750:Tanzania 1644:Empire". 1551:WP:TROUT 930:WP:CFORK 807:article. 753:Leadwind 723:(1991). 605:unsigned 560:Mcorazao 551:history. 511:Wp650385 391:page? -- 335:Nswinton 306:Mcorazao 267:Mcorazao 244:Mcorazao 220:Mcorazao 173:Mcorazao 2031:Rewrite 1937:checked 1914:my edit 1860:Semitic 1848:Japheth 1844:Hamitic 1804:Red Sea 1796:Oceanus 1547:removed 1475:culture 1402:As the 1374:culture 1366:plainly 365:undated 287:of the 275:Comment 257:Richard 232:Richard 210:Frangoi 195:Richard 114:include 39:archive 1945:failed 1858:, see 1850:, see 1842:, see 1525:entire 1431:Franks 805:entire 658:WP:NOT 411:Alex S 352:Drasai 1790:It's 1591:Jobas 1561:Stalk 1557:Hrafn 1533:moved 1493:Stalk 1489:Hrafn 1479:since 1409:into 1354:Stalk 1350:Hrafn 1275:Stalk 1271:Hrafn 1167:Stalk 1163:Hrafn 1151:still 1139:does 1108:Stalk 1104:Hrafn 1063:Stalk 1059:Hrafn 1053:WP:RS 1028:Stalk 1024:Hrafn 990:Stalk 986:Hrafn 969:Stalk 965:Hrafn 940:Stalk 936:Hrafn 903:Read 739:Stalk 735:Hrafn 668:Stalk 664:Hrafn 16:< 2166:talk 2145:talk 2122:talk 2102:talk 1941:true 1890:talk 1868:talk 1856:Shem 1781:talk 1771:Help 1762:talk 1740:(𒁳) 1732:this 1722:(𒁳) 1707:talk 1692:talk 1663:(𒁳) 1595:talk 1540:fact 1535:the 1518:fact 1457:The 1423:The 1413:and 1228:. -- 1208:talk 1190:. -- 907:. -- 892:(𒁳) 837:(𒁳) 801:real 779:talk 758:talk 697:ISBN 642:talk 613:talk 586:talk 525:talk 1978:RfC 1955:). 1943:or 1928:to 1736:dab 1718:dab 1659:dab 1616:or 888:dab 833:dab 477:on 463:JNZ 324:DFH 2168:) 2147:) 2124:) 2104:) 1991:. 1986:}} 1982:{{ 1953:}} 1949:{{ 1892:) 1870:) 1862:. 1830:, 1826:, 1822:, 1818:, 1814:, 1810:, 1806:, 1802:, 1783:) 1764:) 1709:) 1694:) 1633:. 1631:}} 1625:{{ 1612:, 1597:) 1543:}} 1537:{{ 1521:}} 1515:{{ 1437:. 1421:. 1251:be 1210:) 961:. 932:. 781:) 760:) 702:". 644:) 615:) 588:) 580:. 558:-- 527:) 481:. 337:\ 255:-- 242:-- 230:-- 218:-- 193:-- 171:-- 2164:( 2143:( 2120:( 2100:( 2066:" 2023:) 2019:( 2006:. 1999:. 1888:( 1866:( 1779:( 1760:( 1705:( 1690:( 1593:( 1455:. 1342:. 1206:( 777:( 756:( 640:( 611:( 584:( 523:( 409:- 371:. 86:? 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index