982:
Egypt as a logical place to flee and had no idea that young
Ptolemy XIII (or rather his court eunuchs) would ever dream of having him executed in a scheme to appease his rival Julius Caesar. The calculated move to assassinate Pompey backfired for Ptolemy XIII, of course, when hostilities broke out between his faction and Caesar's Roman army stationed in Alexandria. If it wasn't for Pompey, Caesar most likely would not have come to Egypt in the first place to act as a mediator resolving the conflict between Ptolemy XIII and Cleopatra, or perhaps Caesar would have arrived sometime much later in his career due to Egypt's importance as a source of vital grain shipments to Rome. Whatever the case, Pompey was the catalyst for Caesar meeting Cleopatra and then securing her on the throne with the death of Ptolemy XIII in the 47 BC Battle of the Nile. While all of this cannot be explained in the lead, I will try to do so succinctly with a single sentence simply noting that Pompey was a political ally to the Ptolemies, hence the reason for fleeing to Egypt.
855:, obviously a reliable source. However, I had it moved to a footnote because of the rather excessive emphasis on these attributes when they were minor aspects of her reign and personal life. She only commanded one other naval fleet aside from her ships at Actium in conjunction with those of Antony. Her using diplomacy is also what one would expect from any variety of heads of state in antiquity. Scholars still debate the veracity of her medical works being rightfully attributed to her, but this is explained in its appropriate place in the body of the article. Her being a linguist is perhaps the most worthwhile or unquestionable item in this list, but this is mentioned in the body sufficiently and the lead paragraph already mentions how she learned the Egyptian language after her native Koine Greek. I wouldn't remove the footnote, I still find it valuable, but I wouldn't put it back in the lead text of the article either.
2838:...because I'm an American who wrote it and successfully nominated it as a featured article? ;) Quite frankly I don't mind writing in British English and conforming to its conventions of spelling and punctuation, but it is just natural for me to write things in American English. Is that really a problem? People who write in British English do not have a monopoly on articles about history, especially a biographical topic of distant antiquity that has nothing to do with the British Isles (aside from the loose association of Cleopatra's relationship with Julius Caesar, the first Roman statesman to invade the British Isles).
1023:
his previous personal friendship and (now broken) marriage alliance with him, and wanted the propaganda victory of a benevolent leader showing clemency to his bested foes. Caesar was undoubtedly shocked when he learned
Ptolemy XIII (and his advisers) had Pompey - a former Roman consul - killed for the sole purpose of appeasing Caesar and currying favor with him. It was all around a terrible move when it would have been better to capture Pompey and hand him over to Caesar, especially considering how Caesar and Ptolemy XIII came into conflict with each other soon afterwards.
1961:(with a Wiki link) is definitely used in the article, in the "Background" sub-section under the main "Biography" one. The article is long enough as it is. We don't need to go on a tangent about the use of that exceedingly common term for rulers of Egypt, especially when her other more specific titles are already explained. The Wiki article for "pharaoh" is also hidden in a link for "ruler" in the very first sentence of the lead section. I think that is more than sufficient. If people want to know more about that term, they can consult that article via the links provided.
2434:
2075:
439:
interpreters, showing that this was neither normal nor expected. Latin would have been useful to her not so much to speak to Romans but to read material in that language, such as the transcript of the trial of her father's banker
Rabirius Postumus and senatorial actions relating to her kingdom. In addition, the Romans used Latin more than might be expected in the Levantine territories Cleopatra desired, because of a long-standing antipathy to Greek in this region and at least one of her decrees, directed to a Jewish community, probably to Leontopolis, used some Latin.
909:(an explanatory supplement but not policy), the primary purpose of a Knowledge lead is to summarize an article's contents. Therefore, if it's not in the body of the article, it shouldn't be in the lead. If the article doesn't support the characterization as a medical author or linguist, and only minimally supports the characterization as a naval commander and diplomat, then I question whether it would be appropriate to restore these characterizations to the main text of the lead. At this point, I have no opinion about the lead's treatment of Caesarion. –
1743:
3023:. Discussions about genetics are unwarranted until we discover the remains of the Ptolemies, in particular Cleopatra. The Ancestry section of this article (in my view) does a decent job explaining her foreign origins as an ethnic Macedonian Greek of partial Iranian descent via Seleucid royal marriage. That's really all we can do for now, that and mention the modern scholarly speculation that her mother might have been partially native Egyptian (which remains entirely conjecture at this point, something that is dutifully pointed out in the article).
3234:, meaning it has already been vetted by the community for quality content and prose writing. Please do not edit the article further without discussing significant changes here, especially when introducing terms that are not common in English, such as the word "effectuate" in a context where it is not commonly used and does not make sense. Most people who read English Knowledge will struggle to understand why that word is used there; for that matter it is not used properly. What you have done is not a drastic improvement of the prose. Regards,
2051:. The first film from 1899 directed by Méliès is already mentioned. Notice also how the films starring Bara, Colbert, and Taylor are mentioned in the article, noteworthy because of their enormous cultural impact and, in the case of Taylor's film, their enduring legacy. The film with Gardner didn't have the same impact on popular culture, at least not from what I have read. Without a proper academic source, I don't think it would be appropriate to even mention the film with Gardner. You're welcome to create a wholly new sub-article about
2163:
Google
Assistant's main voice command suggestions for Android Samsung Galaxy phone users. The views are real, although it's impossible to say how much of the article the vast majority of these people bother to read beyond the lead section. We speculated that it might be bot activity, but that doesn't really make any sense and the mystery was basically solved above. I wouldn't have figured it out for myself because I'm an iPhone user, never owned a Samsung, and I rarely use voice commands (versus manually typing things out).
952:
Roman dictator and consul) in Caesar's Civil War, the Roman statesman Pompey fled to Egypt, where
Ptolemy had him killed while Caesar occupied Alexandria." It is preceded and followed by statements involving Cleopatra, but it is unclear to me what this sentence communicates about Cleopatra. Is its purpose to illustrate what brought Caesar to Egypt? What brought Pompey to Egypt? Both? Something else? Other than the facts, what it conveys about Cleopatra is unclear. Thanks for any elaboration anyone can provide. –
2966:. From what I have seen, this is a modern scholarly debate that is discussed in most biographies of the queen published in the last few decades. The article carefully navigates this topic by emphasizing that the hypothesis about a partially Egyptian mother (possibly from the priestly household of Ptah at Memphis) is still unproven and entirely conjecture. It is noteworthy in the "Ancestry" section of this article because of the frequency of its discussion in academic works. Knowledge is merely a reflection of
496:
directly, please feel free to create a footnote with an academic source providing a counterpoint or explaining how
Cleopatra knowing how to read and write in Latin might be a dubious argument. Roller is obviously not the only authority on the subject, so other voices in academia are obviously always welcome, especially if they challenge his assertions directly and demonstrate that there isn't a full scholarly consensus on any given issue involving Cleopatra and her reign.
517:
the article so that it doesn't simply state the languages attributed to
Cleopatra as fact) doesn't mention the Romans in his list, and it was the dissenting Reddit comment that called my attention upon this detail. But since I don't have any academic support, I won't change the article on that point; I just wondered about Roller's confidence and thought you might know more. After all, there might be additional, confirming evidence that I'm not aware of. --
31:
2897:, Burstein, and Hölbl. So to write this is "in no way accepted" is just simply categorically false. We cannot know for absolute certain Cleopatra's maternity, although I agree with most scholars she is Cleopatra V/VI (also of uncertain parentage) and even today I added context challenging the hypothesis. I suggest you read all of these scholarly works, instead of, presumably, here to rage about the new Netflix documentary.
1363:" and for that matter there is already a black basalt statue of Cleopatra in the "Cultural Depictions" sub-section of this article. Also, we're talking about white marble here, which by default is white when unpainted or has lost its pigment. Cleopatra was also Macedonian Greek (i.e. colonial European), with no evidence she was native Egyptian/Nubian/African. You did read the "Ancestry" section of this article, right?
761:(especially since this one did not take up additional lines), and this one in particular is of importance in introducing and defining the subject of the article. It could well be restored to the main text. If space is still a concern, then the fragment "nominally survived as pharaoh by her son Caesarion" (which lacks importance here) could be moved to the footnote explaining his pseudo-reign.
3502:
2382:
1984:
1694:
1513:
623:
550:
2970:, and in this case biographies on Cleopatra ranging from Burstein (2004) to Roller (2010) weigh in on the subject. In regards to the passage about her ancestry, suggesting that we "strike it immediately" in a Featured status article vetted by the Wiki community without considerable discussion or debate on the talk page is unwarranted and not how Knowledge works; for that see
2988:
especially if there was nonnative rulers and some degree of uncertainty requiring scholarship to fully parse. In the history of humanity there are too many examples of known minority rulers who are clearly not of the native ancestry even after many years (one example is Abaqa Khan over
Ilkhanate). This is relevant and should be discussed in such a biographical article.
3551:
441:" ---- So there you have it, with proof that Cleopatra used Latin in one of her own decrees. Roller's argument about senatorial litigation makes sense as well, especially considering that Cleopatra lived in Roman Italy for years of her youth, first as a child exile with her father during the short-lived reign of his rival daughter
891:
moved to the footnote, where the rest of the explanation is. I'm not sure if there is a specific rule for footnotes in the lead section, but the section itself is already cluttered with them. Perhaps the part on her being a linguist, author etc. could be moved to the last paragraph with the status of an additional curiosity?
826:
mention this in the first paragraph of the lede, as if it was one of her main activities (d) "diplomat": every head of state does diplomacy, but a diplomat is a representative obeying orders, it cannot be a king, or a queen in this case. I haven't re-read everything so I may have missed something though.
2472:
The notes section of the article would be littered with
Plutarch passages and those of other ancient sources if we provided direct primary source quotations every time an event is described in the article. The bed sack thing is honestly not important enough to warrant that, in my opinion. The average
1896:
wow! Thanks for letting us know. I'm out of the loop on these sorts of things, especially since I'm an iPhone user and I rarely use voice searches since I'm a fast typist. That's incredible to know these viewer numbers are legit. It's mind boggling when you consider the daily average is above 130,000
1430:
Surely there's a better way to present this information than simply listing off each date and its respective supporters? That's how the relevant footnote describes the issue, giving the impression that it's hotly debated, that there are lots of complicated and contradicting ancient evidence which can
1022:
yes, that is correct. Caesar came to Egypt not yet knowing that Pompey had been killed and was still pursuing him and trying to capture him as a prisoner of war following the Battle of
Pharsalus. It might be true or not, but Caesar was said to have wept when he learned that Pompey died, on account of
825:
I have reservations regarding (a) "medical author": the article tells that this is doubted (b) "linguist": the article doesn't tell (c) "naval commander": it is only said that she commanded the rear-guard at Actium, this arguably could be enough to receive this status, but I think it's quite a lot to
516:
As a linguist, I'm not conversant with the literature on Cleopatra – just pointing out that the evidence you're advancing as proof, and Roller is accepting as proof, isn't all that strong. It's certainly striking that the Plutarch quotation (not necessarily compelling proof, either – I've now amended
469:
While it wouldn't be surprising if a polyglot like Cleopatra apparently was also knew Latin, I do wonder where Roller takes this conclusion from with so much confidence. Occasional texts authored by Cleopatra wholly or partly in Latin can have been produced with the help of assistants, so they do not
1150:
hello. I'm going to have to disagree about this. Why are we emphasizing the word "king" here so much? Why are we consistently capitalizing the word "king" here without it being coupled to his name Ptolemy XII Auletes, a proper noun? The word "king" by itself is not a proper noun, even when referring
1068:
Yes, I would say it's okay for the most part. On the issue of Pompey fleeing to Egypt, you highlighted a part that was highly problematic, far too vague for its own good, and desperately needed to be fixed with proper context and clarification. I can't say the same for other parts of the lead, which
282:
See also the "Ethiopian - Ethio-Semitic or Sudanese" section (archive 4 of this talk page). I think the same applies to Arabian/Arabic: 'Arabians' probably refers to the inhabitants of the Sinai, which would later become the Roman province of Arabia Petraea. They certainly did not speak the language
3006:
yet to be discovered, thus her remains have not been found for us to analyze in terms of DNA analysis or genomic reconstruction. To this day none of the Ptolemaic royal tombs or remains have been found. It is possible they were destroyed and buried beneath the waters of the Mediterranean during the
2205:
is not Macedonian greek is just Macedonian empire and Alexander and Macednonians never speak Greek they speak Macedonian like in all documents is saying language diferent then helenic not greek like helenic king Demosten was saying about Macedonian because they are barbara and they speak different
1848:
If that's the case, why on Earth would anyone bother to boost this article's views with bots? I just don't see any reason why someone would bother to do that, even for a high profile monarch from ancient history. I can understand why that happens for current events or living people like celebrities
951:
I have a question that arises out of an effort to make a few minor tweaks to improve the narrative flow in the lead. I'm not understanding the communicative intent of this sentence (quoted as of 18 April 2020): "After losing the 48 BC Battle of Pharsalus in Greece against his rival Julius Caesar (a
890:
ruler of Ptolemaic Egypt, and proceeds to make mention of a supposed nominal reign of her son, itself elaborated on a subsequent footnote. The fragment "nominally survived as pharaoh by her son Caesarion" can hardly be considered important information on Cleopatra herself, and should, I believe, be
731:
when she was only four years old in 47 BC. You are either misreading or totally misrepresenting your rather pedestrian popular history by Georgia Bragg or she made a seriously bad typo that you are now parading around in contradiction to the entire corpus of academic literature regarding Cleopatra.
438:
In addition to her native Greek, she also knew Latin, although the Romans with whom she came into contact would insist on speaking Greek. Greek had been used officially by the Romans since the early 3rd century B.C., and in Cleopatra's day Cicero complained that there were still people who demanded
3301:
edit summary on this article has been "this article needs serious tidying up", but all your edits amount to is fiddling round with the prose, sometimes making the meaning less clear, and with some grammatical errors (near "revolt"). This is an FA, written by a very experienced editor in this area,
2788:
sentence structure or claims being made here. That's especially the case since it is Roller (2010) who is offering this argument. This is not just some original research or opinion of mine, this is a Classicist and specialist in this field making this particular claim and using Syme as an example.
2663:
I would like to see this claim about automated views be substantiated, because another user in a now archived discussion here on the talk page already explained why this article is getting so many views. It's because of Samsung Android smartphone voice command features, which apparently includes a
981:
from power in Egypt. By the time Ptolemy lost the Battle of Pharsalus Ptolemy XII Auletes was dead, but his son Ptolemy XIII was sitting on the throne and engaging in his own civil war with his sister Cleopatra VII. Pompey trusted the Ptolemies as close confidants and political allies, so he chose
972:
Hello! This is a consequence of too many cooks spoiling the broth, so to speak, by attempting to shorten the lead section to what they perceive as the optimal size. In doing so, however, they have excised too many critical and contextual details that are useful to the reader, in my opinion. Pompey
115:
I've never heard anyone suggest this here and I've been closely monitoring the talk page since at least the beginning of 2018 (when I started working on lifting the article to Featured status). Perhaps you should wait a few days, but if no one chimes in, I think it would be great for you to pursue
3041:
for instance). It is quite possible we'll never find the remains of Cleopatra or even be able to form any DNA analysis if she was cremated like most Greeks at the time. IIRC, it was Plutarch who suggested she was mummified in the Egyptian style alongside Mark Antony, but that is obviously another
2987:
Not a real encyclopedia? If you have any specific and concrete change, then we can talk. Let's leave the scholarship to scholars whose work has been peer reviewed by other scholars, many of whom have African heritage themselves. Many articles discuss genetics and race of great historical figures,
2864:
You know this is in no way accepted by scholars- which, to be fair, the article mentions- but neither is it noteworthy enough to be given space (especially when there are so many factual episodes that have to be truncated or omitted). So why is it here? You realize that, by including it, you're
2486:
Apologies for late reply, but surely instead of citing 3 secondary sources - which just cite the source I posted - it would be best to just post the primary source, that of Plutarch? Surely this simplifies the notes section by getting rid of three secondary sources which just themselves reference
2731:
This ("Cleopatra's gender has ... led to her depiction as a minor ... figure") appears to mean that she is being depicted as minor because of her gender - that she would be depicted as a major figure if she were male. However, the following sentence seems to contradict this, and say that she was
2726:
Cleopatra's gender has perhaps led to her depiction as a minor if not insignificant figure in ancient, medieval, and even modern historiography about ancient Egypt and the Greco-Roman world. For instance, the historian Ronald Syme asserted that she was of little importance to Caesar and that the
2349:
I think it's pretty fair to say Ptolemy XIII (and his eunuch handlers) disapproved of Cleopatra VII plotting and flirting with Caesar in the royal palace. The sentence in question sounds fine to me: "When Ptolemy XIII realized that his sister was in the palace consorting directly with Caesar, he
2239:
dialect. A large group of scholars who disagree with that still place it and Greek under a larger "Hellenic" branch of the Indo-European language family. A minority of scholars believe it was an entirely different Indo-European language similar to Thracian or Illyrian. This sort of discussion is
973:
fled to Egypt because he had no other recourse after losing the Battle of Pharsalus. Pompey had previously met Ptolemy XII Auletes in Rome during the latter's exile and didn't just know him personally, he was the chief architect of restoring him to the throne in Egypt. Pompey was the one who had
177:
hello once again! We're moving past the middle of the summer now, and I was wondering if you were still interested in doing a spoken article? The lead section has been changed a little bit since we last spoke, but not significantly. The rest of the article has been basically static, so you could
2787:
Her gaining great levels of attention is not the exact same thing as being deemed insignificant or inconsequential compared to male contemporaries. That's exactly what Syme was arguing, saying she was a figure of little importance compared to Caesar. Again, there's really nothing wrong with the
2162:
This has already been addressed above, so no need to keep spamming the talk page with repetitive discussions. Nobody is "manipulating the views", that's absurd. As one editor above kindly pointed out for us, the massive amount of views this article is receiving is almost certainly due to one of
1621:
Only a specialist knows there was more than one Egyptian-Macedonian or Macedonian "Cleopatra" - the common name is only known as the one most famous in history, cinema, novels, etc. Please read - and learn - and most importantly, LIVE WP:Commonname if you are going to be anything more than an
1048:
still hold true? "I carefully planned the current setup so that the first paragraph would provide essential details, the second would summarize her childhood up to the birth of her son allegedly sired by Caesar, the third paragraph would detail her relationship with Antony and their subsequent
495:
that's certainly a legitimate argument, but Roller (a credentialed classicist) is a reliable source published by a university press. He's certainly not a fringe author on this subject, so I don't think it warrants removing the mention of Latin here. If you can find a source to contradict him
760:
the sentence "She was also a diplomat, naval commander, linguist, and medical author" was removed from the 1st paragraph of the lead and placed in a footnote, apparently over concerns that the section was too large. A single sentence, however, will hardly have a significant impact on space
1442:
If neither date is technically wrong and the gap between them is just a matter of calendar reckoning, then perhaps it would be appropriate to display a single date of death, in the same calendar as the other dates in the article, and have a footnote somewhere describing the discrepancy.
2664:
common illustrative suggestion to open up the Knowledge article on Cleopatra. I would have never known this as an iPhone user, so it was quite revealing. The views are thus seemingly legit, so let's please nix this conversation, since it has no bearing on improving the current article.
2573:
I expect this is just a vacuous test comment, just slightly less vacuous than the ones that have been removed from this page as nonsense over the past few months. No doubt this page attracts so many test comments because the article receives such an absurdly high number of pageviews.
1938:
Short description says “Last active pharoah …”, but the word Pharoah is never used in the article, This seems like an odd situation! Should we change the Short description to ‘last active ruler’? Or expand the article to include discussion of her title? Or neither?
1406:
That's nice, but not really necessary, since the current picture in the article is an appropriate close-up on the two monarchs in carved relief, without emphasizing all the other details. The photograph you've shared here would be more useful in the article on the
2505:). Knowledge articles on history should reflect the consensus positions of modern scholarship, i.e. secondary sources. Ancient primary sources are to be used sparingly and in proper context, such as a direct quote from a primary source if it is somehow needed.
2350:
attempted to rouse the populace of Alexandria into a riot, but he was arrested by Caesar, who used his oratorical skills to calm the frenzied crowd." If you have a better suggestion feel free to offer it, and perhaps do so without being slightly rude. Thanks.
2234:
as their first and native language. This article is also not a place for a debate about their language, as scholars are still unsure how it should be classified, but with a scant amount of evidence, a small majority of academics theorize it was a northwestern
1091:
I'd like to suggest some minor copy-editing of the following 2 sentences in order to help the flow. In an effort to achieve consensus, I am making the suggestion here. If there are no significant objections, I will make the change in the article. Thanks.
1871:
Hello, this has been a trending article for so long because it is one of the Google Assistant's suggested voice searches. When you press the assistant button on an Android, it might give you a prompt saying "Try saying: Show me Cleopatra on Knowledge"
1043:
I read the previous discussions about the lead in the archives of the Talk pages here. I recognize that the lead has seen numerous "cooks" and lots of edits in the journey to GA & FA status. In your opinion, does the organization you described
2860:
Why is there all of this fanciful conjecture about Cleopatra's ancestry in an encyclopedia article? That imagination exercise, that her mother was some unknown, half Greek, half Egyptian woman with familial ties to the priesthood of Ptah?..
2028:
I would like to add in the excerpt of the text where he talks about the actresses who played Claopatra, this missing mention of the 1912 movie Cleopatra starring Helen Gardner. it already has a page on wikipedia about the film and the actress
3320:
Agreed. It would be one thing if this user found and corrected an earnest mistake, but all they really did was introduce unwanted grammatical errors, insert punctuation choices that deviate from the rest of the article and guidelines of the
1002:
Hi! Great job with cultivating the article! So, the purpose of that paragraph is to illustrate how Cleopatra ascended the throne, and the purpose of that sentence (now sentences) in particular is to show how Caesar came to Egypt? Thanks. –
1725:
Pleaae write Cleopatra VII as her title name otherwise it is not clear in regards with all the other Cleopatras especially if used in other ARTICLES AS THE ONE ON THE TIMETABLE OF cYPRES WHERE Cleopatra III and Cleopatra VII are mentioned
726:
Cleopatra was not 21 when she died in 30 BC, that's hilarious. By that ridiculous logic, she would have only been three years old when she met Julius Caesar and had an affair with him in 48 BC and then would have given birth to his child
2221:
This is not the place for this argument. As cited in the article, most scholarly sources refer to Ptolemaic queen Cleopatra VII Philopator as either a "Macedonian Greek" or a "Greco-Macedonian". Also, by the reign of Cleopatra VII all
2417:)) "she stretched herself at full length inside a bed-sack" (Plutarch. Plutarch's Lives. with an English Translation by. Bernadotte Perrin. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. London. William Heinemann Ltd. 1919. 7. is citation)
3036:
While it's inclusion is not warranted in the article, it's perhaps worthwhile to note here that ancient Greeks and Latin Romans from Italy cremated their dead and the Egyptians mummified theirs (even after becoming Romanized, see
277:
She also spoke Ethiopian, Trogodyte, Hebrew (or Aramaic), Arabic, the Syrian language (perhaps Syriac), Median, Parthian, and Latin, although her Roman contemporaries would have preferred to speak with her in her native Koine
1343:
The exclusion of these types of artistic depictions erases the ethnic ambiguity of Cleopatra from the historical narrative which ultimately perpetuates the trope of the civilized white body and the uncivilized brown body.
2413:" Plutarch provides an entirely different and perhaps mythical account that alleges she was bound inside a bed sack to be smuggled into the palace to meet Caesar. " add actual Plutarch source (Plut. Vit. Caes. 49.1) ((
92:
Hi there, I'm looking at making a Spoken version of the Cleopatra article. I just wanted to check and see if anyone already has something in progress? It's a long article so I don't want to duplicate efforts. Cheers,
1173:, let me ask if anyone else is interested in chiming in. Knowledge is a group effort, and no single article belongs to or is written by any single individual. PericlesofAthens, thank you for sharing your input.–
654:
RE: @Thjarkur: I read from a book called How They Croaked by Georgia Bragg . It's recent(published in 2019), and reliable(people on Knowledge "always" mess with everything). I hope this answers your questions.
2556:? Also, the article thoroughly covers the topic of the geographical extent of her kingdom from Egypt to Cyprus, and the domains in the Roman east that she was to rule indirectly as fiefs through Mark Antony's
2772:
It's fine if the sentence is supposed to mean "her role in history is downplayed because she is a woman". But isn't this trying to say the opposite ("she receives MORE attention because she's female")?
850:
hello once again! This is precisely why I had it moved to a footnote. To its defense, these claims appear prominently at the very beginning of the 2010 Oxford University Press biography on Cleopatra by
1431:
point to either 10 or 12 August. One of the sources, Roller, seems completely unaware of any such debate or controversy: he just baldly says the date is 10 August. The only source he in turn gives is
1581:
It would be more professional and academic to refer to Cleopatra VII with her regnal number than without. While most readers would call her just Queen Cleopatra, there are 7 Cleopatras in reality.
2597:
2187:
2875:
2537:
1544:
283:
we call 'Arabic' today (nor one of its ancestors). I don't have access to the cited sources but it seems they refer to the list by Plutarch, which might not be a reliable source. I got this from
3620:
The page has been edited today to only state one sentence: "cleopatra was a girlboss and pretty slay (sic)" I'm unable to re-edit the article back to what it was. Can someone else resolve this?
2207:
1432:
445:, and later as an adult lover of Julius Caesar in his villa located just outside of Rome. When Caesar was assassinated she was even in the city attempting to form a legal basis for their son
1151:
to someone directly, and is only ever capitalized when combined with the monarch's name. I honestly don't see the problem with the original sentences, since they read just fine in context.
1283:
Precisely. Cleopatra VII Philopator was only the seventh (or sixth) queen of the Ptolemaic dynasty named Cleopatra and that's just including the Ptolemies, not even all of those of the
2865:
giving it undue attention and elevating it to the notice of millions. I don't understand how this made it into the article in the first place, but recommend you strike it immediately.
198:
Thanks for the reminder, I have some time to pick this up again and will work on it over the next couple of weeks. It's a long article so I will do it in a few parts. Cheers --
3230:
over the article's prose in the lead section, after being repeatedly asked in edit summaries to first discuss changes here on the talk page. This is one of our encyclopedia's
3261:
2774:
2733:
1788:). Is this just bots? There seems to be a disagreement about "Cleopatra" versus "Cleopatra VII" but this does not seem to be the result of an edit war or anything like that.
2680:
No questioning. Just brought an insider possible explanation I found inside WP. I also don't have problem If we eliminate the thread, as It feels like a WP:FORUM. Cheers, --
2318:
That's a rather rigid way to look at it; are you a native speaker of English? There's honestly nothing wrong with saying they maintained an affair, which is what they did.
3350:
In the Infobox, her father's name is not hyperlinked but her mother's name is. Can you please hyperlink his name? Thank you. Example: Ptolemy XII should have ] around it.
156:
Hiya, I started the recording back in October/November but my schedule has gotten a lot busier lately so I put it on hold. I'm hoping to pick it up again in the Spring. --
1853:
since October 2020 when news broke that she landed the role for Cleopatra, it appears this article gets way more views than hers. I suppose something weird is going on.
2047:. It's not important for this main article on Cleopatra to list every single movie about the queen, since there are many of them and doing so would lend Gardner's film
219:
Thanks! That sounds marvelous. I can't wait to hear it. The Wiki community and indeed its entire reading audience will be indebted to your contributions. Kind regards,
2893:
is considered the most eminent scholar by many on Cleopatra. His hypothesis isn't without circumstantial evidence, and is built upon the works of prior scholars like
470:
constitute sufficient proof on their own. There are a lot of things claimed as "undoubtedly" true where I just don't see the evidential basis for this judgment. Even
3197:
Cleopatra's mother: this is mentioned with citations in the article on Cleo VI. So I'm going to go ahead and try (again!) to change the text to “Mother: presumably
3325:, and offer improper uses of certain terms that don't make sense in their given context. We should all observe that old adage: "if it's not broke, don't fix it."
3143:(which is mentioned on both these pages). If they are the same, then obviously Cleo VI is “also” the mother of Cleopatra but only because they are the same woman.
3189:
known as Cleo V. If that were true Knowledge wouldn't have two separate articles about the same person. Cleo VI has a separate article exactly because she was
1826:
The increase in views is too high and continuous to be real. It's currently not in the the news, but the numbers are over the top. Definitely not natural. --
3158:
as the mother of Cleopatra. The article also mentions that if Cleo VI existed as a separate person she would be a (half)sister to Cleopatra, not her mother.
1098:
Suggestion: After the King and Cleopatra returned to Egypt with Roman military assistance, Berenice was killed in 55 BC, allowing the King to regain power.
2948:
It's not a real encyclopedia if it allows critical thought and academic scholarship, of course, especially if it doesn't align with certain racial biases.
3174:
Cleopatra's mother, we should not link to that article as the presumed mother of Cleopatra! Instead, we should link to Cleo V, the only known candidate.
2615:
I've been keeping an eye on this article's near constant presence in the top read section on Knowledge since September 2020. Why?! It's so bewildering!!
736:, with a discussion about the contention within academia and why there isn't a full scholarly consensus for either the 10 or 12 of August in 30 BC. --
1809:
slotted to play her in a movie to be produced in the near future. Popular media is usually the biggest driver of greater article views on Knowledge.
1487:. In the meantime, I have made a hidden link for "pharaoh" for the word "ruler" in the very first sentence of the lead. I think that should suffice.
2044:
1897:
views. If it maintained that exact number every day for a whole year, i.e. 365 days, that would amount to over 47.4 million views. LOL. Staggering.
2262:
You can only maintain something that is already there. Yet, in the lead, the affair is suddenly there. Should we change "maintained" to "started"?
2240:
irrelevant to Cleopatra, though, and we should be using the terminology favored by the majority of relevant academics in describing her ethnicity.
1295:(his only full-blooded sibling, not just a half-sister). Then we have women named Cleopatra who didn't even really exist because they were part of
2737:
872:, who wrote a now-lost dictionary of Etruscan—I'd support describing her as a linguist, but simply being a polyglot does not make her a linguist.
3124:
The rationale for the change is as follows. If you disagree with any of the facts below discuss it here instead of simply reverting the change.
2596:
The family tree section is confusing to me - shouldn’t there be a legend that tells you what the different line patterns (dashed, solid) mean?
1185:
I agree with Pericles that "King" is vague and not even the correct title. The first suggestion is also longer, while the lede is long enough.
681:
Bragg, Georgia. “How They Croaked by Georgia Bragg.” Goodreads, Amazon, LLC., Aug. 2019, www.goodreads.com/book/show/9111463-how-they-croaked.
306:
it referred to the inhabitants of the Sinai, it's not improbable that they spoke a language at least closely related to Classical Arabic; see
3369:
actually is already linked in the info box, in the field labelled "predecessor". We generally do not link things twice in the same info box.
1607:
most people will know her as just Cleopatra, and will search for her as just Cleopatra, so this article is likely to stay at just Cleopatra.
1588:
1291:
who introduced the name to the Ptolemaic line or just other previous random Greek/Macedonian women like the sister of Alexander the Great:
1232:
1214:
1849:
or partisan politicians, but this is a long dead Ptolemaic queen we're talking about. However, judging by the views received for the page
1336:
On display are white monochrome statues of Cleopatra. There are no displays of black monochrome statues of Cleopatra. Such as this one: (
284:
3684:
3640:
3585:
3463:
2414:
1629:
1391:
1340:) there are no displays of Cleopatra from the ‘L’Abreujamen de las estorias’ which show her skin color in stark contrast to Europeans.
2751:
fall under that category. Ronald Syme is the one explicitly downplaying her importance in this example. This is an observation made by
2601:
2191:
316:
is likely attested in the 1st century BC inscription from Qaryat al-Faw, and the article is (somewhat indirectly, through a mention of
3621:
3383:
3351:
2989:
2879:
2819:
2541:
1548:
1463:
2211:
3128:
The mother of Cleopatra is not known with 100% certainty, but there is only one possible candidate who is known by name and that is
1781:
3248:
In addition to these changes being largely unnecessary, you have also incorrectly used a hyphen for a sentence break instead of an
2473:
reader will already have a difficult time navigating through all the notes and the vast majority of readers will not utilize them.
1411:
aillustrating how the temple looks overall. For that reason the current picture should stay and this one should be used elsewhere.
599:
21 years is for how long she reigned. Since there is uncertainty about her birth date, both are mentioned and further explained in
449:
to become the lawful heir of Julius Caesar and the true inheritor of his will, a document that was undoubtedly written in Latin.
1315:
was born in Egypt as a Ptolemaic princess but she married into the Seleucid dynasty and ruled from Syria in the 2nd century BC.
2463:
1749:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a
1566:
3419:
It is always best to check the archives when asking a question like this. I think you may find the answer to your question at
1785:
2778:
407:
I'm more interested in where the conclusion comes from that she spoke Latin, since the Reddit comment indicates otherwise. --
581:
Change the birth dates. There one that says 21 years old when she died. Also change the death date. It's August 10, not 12.
2501:
No. Knowledge guidelines are firmly against that (see for instance the recent "Featured Article Review" for the article on
2835:
2812:
1125:
1110:
258:
3280:
I thought you might want to take a look at this and provide your judgment about the latest round of edits by this user.
2453:
389:
Good point – it's entirely possible that the "Arabians" mentioned by Plutarch were people from South Arabia, instead. --
354:
3231:
292:
2345:
It is already in plain English. You've never heard the fairly common phrase "consorting with the enemy"? To consort:
732:
Either way, the dates for Cleopatra's birth and death are fully explained in the article footnote referred to you by
474:
the document in question was written in Latin – so what? Again, she would have had assistants available if needed. --
2260:
Caesar declared Cleopatra and her brother Ptolemy XIV joint rulers but maintained a private affair with Cleopatra...
3072:
2967:
2459:
1750:
1562:
811:
That sounds very sensible. I remember when the sentence was in the lead and it looked like a very good definition.
783:
522:
479:
412:
394:
329:
38:
3201:” and if you want to revert it, please don't do so without providing a solid argument why my reasoning is wrong.
2019:
1877:
436:(2010) as a model. The claim about Latin actually comes from Roller (pp. 46–48), who I can quote for you here: "
324:) even attested in Herodotus. But thanks for the Reddit link as it provides a direct quotation from Plutarch. --
3008:
1831:
1612:
1592:
1095:
Original sentence: Berenice was killed in 55 BC when Ptolemy returned to Egypt with Roman military assistance.
1049:
downfall, and the fourth paragraph would explain her legacy and relevance in art and popular media." Thanks. –
1045:
72:
67:
59:
2953:
2902:
1805:
No, I don't think it has anything to do with bots. I would assume it has something to do with news of actress
1236:
1218:
3644:
3589:
1395:
828:
I suppose this sentence was moved to footnote because it was a bit overblown, but now I support its removal.
660:
586:
3688:
3674:
3508:
3467:
3387:
3355:
2993:
2557:
2446:
2388:
2040:
1990:
1700:
1633:
1519:
1467:
1382:
629:
556:
428:
Hello! I'm the one who wrote the majority of the article and nominated it for FA status, relying largely on
312:
288:
2747:
No, the statement is perfectly fine. Notice the stress on "even modern historiography" there; the works of
3625:
3605:
3227:
3163:
3147:
3136:
3114:
2963:
2109:
2048:
2015:
1780:
It seems this article has been one of the top 5 most-viewed articles on and off throughout 2021 (see e.g.
787:
3099:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
2949:
2898:
2081:
Going through the Edit Request backlog and am going to close this one as per the explanation provided by
1439:
misleadingly cites Skeat as one of the supporters of 12 August, despite Roller using him as his source).
1249:
1069:
look okay. The overall organization of the lead section that you've mentioned here is also still intact.
3670:
3371:
3327:
3302:
whuich seems to be a new one for you. As Pericles says, I would propose any further changes here first.
3282:
3266:
3236:
3198:
3140:
3129:
3118:
3044:
3038:
3025:
2976:
2840:
2790:
2769:
2757:
2685:
2666:
2646:
2562:
2507:
2475:
2352:
2320:
2289:
2283:
The word choice is fine, actually, especially since the same sentence mentions the birth of their child
2242:
2165:
2082:
2057:
2035:
1963:
1899:
1855:
1811:
1675:
1655:
1489:
1413:
1365:
1349:
1317:
1168:
1153:
1071:
1038:
1025:
997:
984:
857:
738:
721:
690:
656:
596:
582:
518:
511:
498:
490:
475:
464:
451:
423:
408:
390:
384:
371:
340:
325:
221:
193:
180:
151:
138:
118:
3636:
3601:
2052:
1254:
As explained by a footnote in the page you linked to, the Cleopatra who is mentioned in 1 Maccabees is
254:
1345:
285:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/d47u90/how_did_cleopatra_speak_arabic_if_the_language/
3569:
3208:
3204:
3096:
2933:
2871:
2732:
treated as MORE important because of her gender. Can someone fix these sentences so they make sense?
2620:
2533:
2415:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plut.+Caes.+49&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0244
2331:
what does the phrase "consorting directly with Caesar" mean? How about saying it in plain English? –
2089:
1891:
1873:
1754:
1625:
1604:
1584:
1387:
1292:
1228:
1210:
906:
711:
609:
246:
3294:
3223:
1727:
243:
No such thing as oratorix or skill or calm or attracx or not, say/can say any nmw and any be perfx
3366:
3257:
2971:
2579:
2488:
2441:
2418:
2223:
1827:
1762:
1731:
1608:
1304:
1263:
1177:
1135:
1053:
1007:
956:
926:
913:
877:
816:
203:
161:
98:
250:
3534:
3441:
3428:
3405:
3252:("—"), which contrasts with the rest of the article and goes against the basic guidelines in the
3080:
3003:
2694:
Thank you for repeating the Samsung factor. I changed automated views for unintentional views in
2492:
2422:
2307:
2269:
1360:
1308:
1117:
1102:
178:
probably just pick up where you left off! Please consider it and thanks for the effort. Regards,
116:
making a spoken audio version of the article. I would thoroughly enjoy hearing it! All the best,
357:
was used as a model for others in East Africa as far back as the 5th century BC, the kingdom of
3658:
3482:
3307:
3071:"I know this isn't a real encyclopedia" Well, we are a better example of an encyclopedia than
3012:
2703:
2695:
2638:
2124:
2105:
1917:
1448:
1408:
1300:
791:
771:
346:
3538:
3445:
3409:
2681:
2656:
2642:
1946:
1795:
1671:
1651:
1288:
1284:
896:
801:
366:
3007:
various disastrous earthquakes that brought down Hellenistic era monuments like the Pharos
3560:
3084:
3020:
2924:
2890:
2883:
2752:
2677:
2660:
2634:
2630:
2616:
2148:
2085:
1296:
1207:
She was mentioned in the Bible. I can't find any mention of the Bible in this wiki page.
1191:
852:
834:
702:
429:
349:
were the only literate Arabic speaking peoples at the time considering the kingdom of the
733:
707:
605:
310:
for details. A direct ancestor of Classical Arabic which uses the characteristic article
1753:
if appropriate. The lede already says she is Cleopatra VII. Article names are based on
1383:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/User:Merlin-UK/Egypt#/media/File:SFEC-DENDERA-2010-085.JPG
2575:
2560:. I'm not sure that I understand what you think the article should include after that.
1758:
1484:
1312:
1278:
1259:
1255:
1145:
1063:
1017:
974:
967:
922:
873:
812:
214:
199:
172:
157:
131:
110:
94:
47:
17:
694:
600:
136:
Hello again. Are you still interested in doing a spoken article version of Cleopatra?
3437:
3424:
3322:
3253:
3100:
3076:
2894:
2336:
2302:
2264:
1462:
The subject says it all. Further it should also be mentioned in the box on the right.
775:
3654:
3478:
3317:
3303:
3277:
3132:(additionally, historical consensus is that most likely she was indeed the mother).
2699:
2120:
1913:
1458:
In the first or second sentence should be mentioned that she was a pharaoh of Egypt
1444:
1121:
1106:
1435:
by Skeat, who attributes the two-day gap to the newly-introduced Julian calendar (
977:, the Roman governor of Syria, raise an army for ousting Ptolemy's rival daughter
3669:
It's fixed when I go on the website but it still shows that sentence on the app.
3121:
again, after my initial change was rudely reverted without proper justification.
1483:" is mentioned multiple times in the body of the article, it is not found in the
1124:
began upon the King's death in 51 BC, but a falling-out between them led to open
3016:
2748:
2236:
2231:
1942:
1791:
978:
892:
797:
697:
I pointed to? It explains the matter in detail and points to scholarly sources.
442:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3692:
3678:
3662:
3648:
3629:
3609:
3593:
3579:
3542:
3486:
3471:
3449:
3432:
3413:
3391:
3377:
3359:
3333:
3311:
3288:
3272:
3242:
3212:
3103:
3050:
3031:
2997:
2982:
2957:
2943:
2906:
2846:
2826:
2796:
2782:
2763:
2741:
2707:
2689:
2672:
2650:
2624:
2605:
2583:
2568:
2545:
2513:
2496:
2481:
2467:
2426:
2358:
2347:
habitually associate with (someone), typically with the disapproval of others.
2340:
2326:
2313:
2295:
2275:
2248:
2215:
2195:
2171:
2152:
2144:
2128:
2113:
2093:
2063:
2023:
1969:
1950:
1921:
1905:
1881:
1861:
1835:
1817:
1799:
1766:
1735:
1679:
1659:
1637:
1616:
1596:
1570:
1552:
1495:
1471:
1452:
1419:
1399:
1371:
1353:
1323:
1267:
1240:
1194:
1186:
1180:
1159:
1138:
1077:
1056:
1031:
1010:
990:
959:
930:
916:
900:
881:
868:
If Cleopatra had written about language as a sideline to being a monarch—like
863:
845:
837:
829:
820:
805:
744:
714:
664:
612:
590:
526:
504:
483:
457:
416:
398:
377:
333:
307:
296:
262:
227:
207:
186:
165:
144:
124:
102:
1223:
3512:
2392:
2284:
1994:
1850:
1806:
1704:
1523:
728:
633:
560:
446:
3533:
Fix a typo: Change “Assassinations of Caesar” to “Assassination of Caesar”
886:
What about the part on Caesarion? The first sentence says she was the last
3462:
Is the burial location of Cleopatra VII known? If so, it should be added.
1777:
Not sure if this is the best place to ask this, please remove as needed.
2502:
2332:
869:
350:
2889:
Seems you're new here and do not know much about Cleopatra scholarship.
2722:
The last paragraph of this section starts with the following sentences:
2137:
Someone's manipulating the views. It always has between 140k-160k views.
2055:, where that topic is relevant and can be rightfully covered at length.
3249:
2727:
propaganda of Octavian magnified her importance to an excessive degree.
2227:
1957:
1480:
3639:
needs updating, apparently it's been like this for almost a full day
3404:
Has been for years. Would love to know why if anyone has an insight.
2962:@ the anonymous IP commentor: this is most certainly not an issue of
362:
317:
358:
2868:
I know this isn't a real encyclopedia, but that's just insane.
2300:
That means that both the child and the affair are suddenly there.
1359:
LOL. That "Bust of Cleopatra" is already used in the sub-article "
3113:
I'm going to try to change the presumed mother of Cleopatra from
2641:, Cleopatra has registered large amounts of "automated views". --
1436:
2104:
Is there some sort of historical discovery that has been found?
1337:
3496:
2611:
Why is this article almost ALWAYS in the Knowledge top read???
2376:
1978:
1688:
1507:
770:(69 – 10 or 12 August 30 BC) was the last active ruler of the
617:
544:
25:
3181:
Cleopatra VI Tryphaena (also known as Cleopatra V Tryphaena)
3019:
is that Cleopatra VII is possibly buried near the temple at
3135:
There is some discussion about whether the person known as
3421:
Talk:Cleopatra/Archive 5#Trending article throughout 2021
1912:
Good to know - I wonder how many listen for long though.
757:
705:
book, but here it is best to use scholarly sources. –
3420:
1101:
Original sentence: When he died in 51 BC, the joint
3262:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
1109:began, but a falling-out between them led to open
2811:Why is this article written in American English?
1577:The title should be changed back to Cleopatra VII
2530:Please discuss about where she riened the most
3177:Additionally, the description in the info-box:
2373:Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2021
1650:Empty request, presumed an experiment, closed.
275:
3493:Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2023
1975:Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2021
780:(footnote explaining Caesarion's pseudo-reign)
541:Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2020
3653:No, it was like this for less than a minute.
3075:and its numerous omissions and inaccuracies.
3004:Cleopatra was interred at an unknown location
1685:Semi-protected edit request on 21 August 2021
8:
1338:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Bust_of_Cleopatra
1258:, who lived a century before Cleopatra VII.
2458:template. Secondary sources are preferred.
1666:Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2021
1504:Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2021
3095:There is a move discussion in progress on
3011:. The recent hypothesis by archaeologists
2869:
2531:
1623:
1582:
1385:
1378:Larger picture of Cleopatra & Cesarion
1226:
1224:http://www.usccb.org/bible/1maccabees10:21
1208:
244:
1645:Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2021
2143:I don't know why you'd bother though...
2045:List of cultural depictions of Cleopatra
2033:Director Charles L. Gaskill's 1912 film
3600:It's all junked up somebody please fix
2598:2603:8080:D700:3328:5DAD:C9E2:9218:7585
2188:2603:9001:6900:969D:3084:F73B:EC64:6E2B
1479:Not a bad suggestion. While the title "
947:Question Re. Narrative Flow in the Lead
905:Responding to T8612's point above, per
764:The 1st paragraph would be as follows:
674:
2919:
2876:2601:249:9301:FF80:BDC1:4233:353D:FF68
2538:2605:8D80:4C0:8E76:6278:5945:D018:804A
1545:2600:1700:4C94:20A0:CA7:4B1C:1FD8:2710
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3293:I've taken a look and reverted them.
2208:2A02:C7D:E83C:E500:3DB6:49C:571B:B543
345:Yes, it's not like the people of the
273:This is about the following sentence
7:
3400:Why us this article always trending?
2043:is noted prominently in the article
1303:, wife of Meleager, or even the two
3150:is specifically about Cleo VI as a
2718:Roman literature and historiography
2230:and elsewhere spoke the universal
24:
2637:thread. But anyway, according to
3549:
3500:
3042:unproven claim per archaeology.
2432:
2380:
2073:
1982:
1773:Trending article throughout 2021
1741:
1692:
1511:
621:
548:
29:
3365:Thanks for the suggestion, but
3193:a different person, and if so,
3146:However, the Knowledge article
2922:? What do you think it is? -
3002:The article does mention that
2633:This should be closer to be a
2100:WHY IS THIS STILL TRENDING?!?!
1970:02:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
1951:13:12, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
3693:16:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
3218:Changes to lead section prose
2775:2601:640:4000:3170:0:0:0:614B
2742:03:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
2734:2601:640:4000:3170:0:0:0:F6D3
2708:03:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
2427:21:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
2276:00:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
2249:18:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
2216:11:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
2196:19:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
2172:12:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
2153:02:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
1922:04:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
1906:23:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
1882:16:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
1453:20:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
527:17:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
505:13:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
484:01:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
458:23:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
417:21:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
399:01:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
378:23:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
334:21:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
263:20:47, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
166:03:01, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
145:23:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
3679:16:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3663:04:13, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3649:03:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3630:02:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
3616:Only One Sentence Available?
3610:21:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
3580:07:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
3543:07:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
3487:20:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
3472:17:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
2847:14:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
2827:13:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
2797:06:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
2783:04:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
2690:05:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
2673:04:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
2651:00:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
2625:07:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
2606:15:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
2129:17:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
2119:Or new tv show more likely!
2114:17:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
2094:23:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
2064:16:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
2024:01:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1617:03:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1597:02:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1561:No edit requested, closing.
1420:02:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
1400:02:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
613:17:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
591:16:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
361:, before the development of
355:Ancient South Arabian script
297:02:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
125:05:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
103:03:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
3527:to reactivate your request.
3515:has been answered. Set the
3450:16:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
3433:15:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
3414:11:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
3392:07:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
3378:07:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
3360:05:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
3334:17:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
3312:14:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
3289:13:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
3273:13:50, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
3243:23:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
3232:Knowledge:Featured articles
3166:is specially about Cleo VI
3091:Move discussion in progress
2764:21:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
2755:, as cited in the article.
2482:11:17, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
2468:01:34, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
2407:to reactivate your request.
2395:has been answered. Set the
2009:to reactivate your request.
1997:has been answered. Set the
1862:13:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
1836:10:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
1818:11:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
1800:04:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
1767:18:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
1736:18:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
1719:to reactivate your request.
1707:has been answered. Set the
1538:to reactivate your request.
1526:has been answered. Set the
1221:) 02:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
648:to reactivate your request.
636:has been answered. Set the
575:to reactivate your request.
563:has been answered. Set the
3709:
3085:09:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
2983:13:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
2958:02:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
2944:02:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
2907:02:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
2884:00:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
2514:09:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
2497:03:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
2359:13:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
2341:13:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
2327:13:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
2255:Affair with Caesar in lead
1638:15:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
1496:22:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
1472:13:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
1078:18:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
1057:16:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
1032:15:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
1011:14:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
991:04:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
960:03:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
228:21:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
208:21:41, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
187:22:47, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
3594:09:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
3213:00:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
3185:is wrong. Cleo VI is not
2854:
2584:01:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2569:01:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2546:00:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2314:22:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
2296:00:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
2036:Cleopatra, Queen of Egypt
1680:05:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
1571:11:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
1553:10:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
1372:17:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1354:17:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
1324:04:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
1268:03:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
1241:02:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
782:She was also a diplomat,
745:21:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
715:21:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
665:20:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
3226:that you are engaged in
3104:08:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
3051:23:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
3032:23:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
3009:Lighthouse of Alexandria
2998:20:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
2836:The Emperor of Byzantium
2815:✠ Emperor of Byzantium ✠
1195:15:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
1181:15:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
1160:03:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
1139:12:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
931:05:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
921:I agree with Kekki1978.
917:16:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
901:01:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
882:01:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
864:00:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
838:21:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
821:20:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
806:20:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
768:Cleopatra VII Philopator
3073:Encyclopædia Britannica
2920:Not a real Encyclopedia
2558:Donations of Alexandria
1670:Another empty request.
1660:07:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
369:by the 1st century AD.
3228:Knowledge:edit warring
3164:Cleopatra VI Tryphaena
3148:Cleopatra VI Tryphaena
3139:is the same person as
3137:Cleopatra VI Tryphaena
3115:Cleopatra VI Tryphaena
2729:
2526:About where she reined
1332:Depiction of Cleopatra
1116:Suggestion: The joint
434:Cleopatra: a biography
353:. For that matter the
280:
3264:about your behavior.
3260:, I have alerted the
3199:Cleopatra V Tryphaena
3154:person and therefore
3141:Cleopatra V Tryphaena
3130:Cleopatra V Tryphaena
3119:Cleopatra V Tryphaena
3039:Fayum mummy portraits
2855:Cleopatra's Parentage
2724:
2460:ScottishFinnishRadish
1563:ScottishFinnishRadish
790:. As a member of the
42:of past discussions.
3168:as a separate person
3162:Because the article
3097:Talk:Ptolemy I Soter
2444:for this alteration
2206:language then greek
1934:Last active Pharoah?
1622:annoyance on Wiki.
1293:Cleopatra of Macedon
1165:Before I respond to
3367:Ptolemy XII Auletes
3109:Mother of Cleopatra
2968:WP:Reliable sources
2454:edit semi-protected
2440:please establish a
2224:Ancient Macedonians
1305:daughters of Danaus
269:Languages she spoke
3376:
3373:Pericles of Athens
3332:
3329:Pericles of Athens
3287:
3284:Pericles of Athens
3271:
3268:Pericles of Athens
3241:
3238:Pericles of Athens
3049:
3046:Pericles of Athens
3030:
3027:Pericles of Athens
2981:
2978:Pericles of Athens
2845:
2842:Pericles of Athens
2795:
2792:Pericles of Athens
2762:
2759:Pericles of Athens
2671:
2668:Pericles of Athens
2567:
2564:Pericles of Athens
2512:
2509:Pericles of Athens
2480:
2477:Pericles of Athens
2357:
2354:Pericles of Athens
2325:
2322:Pericles of Athens
2294:
2291:Pericles of Athens
2247:
2244:Pericles of Athens
2170:
2167:Pericles of Athens
2062:
2059:Pericles of Athens
1968:
1965:Pericles of Athens
1904:
1901:Pericles of Athens
1860:
1857:Pericles of Athens
1816:
1813:Pericles of Athens
1494:
1491:Pericles of Athens
1418:
1415:Pericles of Athens
1370:
1367:Pericles of Athens
1361:Reign of Cleopatra
1322:
1319:Pericles of Athens
1158:
1155:Pericles of Athens
1118:reign of Cleopatra
1103:reign of Cleopatra
1076:
1073:Pericles of Athens
1030:
1027:Pericles of Athens
989:
986:Pericles of Athens
862:
859:Pericles of Athens
743:
740:Pericles of Athens
503:
500:Pericles of Athens
456:
453:Pericles of Athens
376:
373:Pericles of Athens
226:
223:Pericles of Athens
185:
182:Pericles of Athens
143:
140:Pericles of Athens
123:
120:Pericles of Athens
3577:
3531:
3530:
3370:
3326:
3281:
3265:
3235:
3222:This is to alert
3043:
3024:
3013:Kathleen Martinez
2975:
2941:
2886:
2874:comment added by
2839:
2807:American English?
2789:
2756:
2665:
2561:
2548:
2536:comment added by
2506:
2474:
2438:Not done for now:
2411:
2410:
2351:
2319:
2288:
2241:
2164:
2056:
2053:Cleopatra in film
2013:
2012:
1962:
1898:
1854:
1810:
1723:
1722:
1640:
1628:comment added by
1599:
1587:comment added by
1542:
1541:
1488:
1412:
1409:Temple of Dendera
1402:
1390:comment added by
1364:
1316:
1301:Cleopatra Alcyone
1243:
1231:comment added by
1222:
1213:comment added by
1152:
1070:
1024:
983:
856:
792:Ptolemaic dynasty
772:Ptolemaic Kingdom
737:
652:
651:
579:
578:
497:
450:
370:
347:Nabataean Kingdom
289:Sawtoothcoriander
265:
249:comment added by
220:
179:
137:
117:
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3700:
3578:
3574:
3567:
3565:
3557:
3553:
3552:
3522:
3518:
3504:
3503:
3497:
3374:
3330:
3285:
3269:
3239:
3047:
3028:
2979:
2950:Kleopatra I Syra
2942:
2938:
2931:
2929:
2899:Kleopatra I Syra
2843:
2824:
2823:
2817:
2816:
2793:
2770:PericlesofAthens
2760:
2669:
2565:
2510:
2478:
2457:
2436:
2435:
2402:
2398:
2384:
2383:
2377:
2355:
2323:
2310:
2305:
2292:
2272:
2267:
2245:
2201:Macedonian queen
2168:
2083:PericlesofAthens
2077:
2076:
2060:
2004:
2000:
1986:
1985:
1979:
1966:
1902:
1895:
1858:
1814:
1745:
1744:
1714:
1710:
1696:
1695:
1689:
1533:
1529:
1515:
1514:
1508:
1492:
1416:
1368:
1320:
1289:Cleopatra I Syra
1285:Seleucid dynasty
1282:
1253:
1189:
1176:
1172:
1169:PericlesofAthens
1156:
1149:
1134:
1120:and her brother
1105:and her brother
1074:
1067:
1052:
1042:
1039:PericlesofAthens
1028:
1021:
1006:
1001:
998:PericlesofAthens
987:
971:
955:
912:
860:
849:
832:
786:, linguist, and
741:
725:
699:How They Croaked
682:
679:
643:
639:
625:
624:
618:
570:
566:
552:
551:
545:
519:Florian Blaschke
515:
512:PericlesofAthens
501:
494:
491:Florian Blaschke
476:Florian Blaschke
468:
465:PericlesofAthens
454:
427:
424:Florian Blaschke
409:Florian Blaschke
391:Florian Blaschke
388:
385:PericlesofAthens
374:
367:Kingdom of Aksum
344:
341:Florian Blaschke
326:Florian Blaschke
224:
218:
197:
194:PericlesofAthens
183:
176:
155:
152:PericlesofAthens
141:
135:
121:
114:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3708:
3707:
3703:
3702:
3701:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3618:
3570:
3561:
3559:
3550:
3548:
3520:
3516:
3501:
3495:
3460:
3402:
3372:
3348:
3328:
3283:
3267:
3237:
3220:
3111:
3093:
3045:
3026:
3021:Taposiris Magna
2977:
2964:WP:UNDUE WEIGHT
2934:
2925:
2923:
2891:Duane W. Roller
2857:
2841:
2821:
2820:
2814:
2813:
2809:
2791:
2758:
2753:Duane W. Roller
2720:
2667:
2613:
2594:
2563:
2528:
2508:
2476:
2451:
2433:
2400:
2396:
2381:
2375:
2353:
2321:
2308:
2303:
2290:
2270:
2265:
2257:
2243:
2203:
2184:
2166:
2102:
2074:
2058:
2049:WP:Undue weight
2026:
2016:GabrielDorneles
2002:
1998:
1983:
1977:
1964:
1936:
1900:
1892:Castlebuilder11
1889:
1874:Castlebuilder11
1856:
1812:
1775:
1751:reliable source
1742:
1712:
1708:
1693:
1687:
1668:
1647:
1589:218.190.213.216
1579:
1555:
1531:
1527:
1512:
1506:
1490:
1460:
1428:
1414:
1380:
1366:
1334:
1318:
1297:Greek mythology
1276:
1247:
1205:
1187:
1174:
1166:
1154:
1143:
1132:
1072:
1061:
1050:
1036:
1026:
1015:
1004:
995:
985:
965:
953:
949:
910:
858:
853:Duane W. Roller
843:
830:
795:
784:naval commander
758:Over a year ago
755:
739:
719:
703:popular history
687:
686:
685:
680:
676:
641:
637:
622:
568:
564:
549:
543:
509:
499:
488:
462:
452:
430:Duane W. Roller
421:
382:
372:
338:
279:
271:
222:
212:
191:
181:
170:
149:
139:
129:
119:
108:
90:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3706:
3704:
3696:
3695:
3681:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3617:
3614:
3613:
3612:
3598:
3597:
3596:
3584:enjoy guys...
3529:
3528:
3505:
3494:
3491:
3490:
3489:
3477:No, it isn't.
3459:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3401:
3398:
3397:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3347:
3344:
3343:
3342:
3341:
3340:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3336:
3295:User:Zagreus99
3258:your talk page
3256:. As noted on
3224:User:Zagreus99
3219:
3216:
3195:definitely not
3183:
3182:
3172:definitely not
3160:
3159:
3144:
3133:
3110:
3107:
3092:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3053:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2866:
2862:
2856:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2808:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2719:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2692:
2612:
2609:
2593:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2527:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2409:
2408:
2385:
2374:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2329:
2256:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2202:
2199:
2183:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2132:
2131:
2101:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2069:
2067:
2066:
2014:
2011:
2010:
1987:
1976:
1973:
1935:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1828:Triggerhippie4
1821:
1820:
1786:here (Spanish)
1774:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1721:
1720:
1697:
1686:
1683:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1646:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1619:
1609:IdreamofJeanie
1578:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1543:
1540:
1539:
1516:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1459:
1456:
1427:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1313:Cleopatra Thea
1271:
1270:
1256:Cleopatra Thea
1250:102.41.149.231
1233:102.41.149.231
1215:102.41.149.231
1204:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
975:Aulus Gabinius
948:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
884:
788:medical author
766:
754:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
684:
683:
673:
672:
668:
650:
649:
626:
616:
615:
577:
576:
553:
542:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
365:in Ethiopia's
276:
270:
267:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
89:
88:Spoken Article
86:
83:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
18:Talk:Cleopatra
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3705:
3694:
3690:
3686:
3685:76.77.161.145
3683:Tap icon sed
3682:
3680:
3676:
3672:
3671:GamerKlim9716
3668:
3664:
3660:
3656:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3646:
3642:
3641:136.55.53.153
3638:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3627:
3623:
3615:
3611:
3607:
3603:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3587:
3586:110.37.39.207
3583:
3582:
3581:
3575:
3573:
3566:
3564:
3556:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3526:
3523:parameter to
3514:
3510:
3506:
3499:
3498:
3492:
3488:
3484:
3480:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3469:
3465:
3464:74.15.254.221
3457:
3451:
3447:
3443:
3439:
3436:
3435:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3411:
3407:
3399:
3393:
3389:
3385:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3375:
3368:
3364:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3357:
3353:
3345:
3335:
3331:
3324:
3319:
3315:
3314:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3286:
3279:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3270:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3251:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3240:
3233:
3229:
3225:
3217:
3215:
3214:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3188:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3169:
3165:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3131:
3127:
3126:
3125:
3122:
3120:
3116:
3108:
3106:
3105:
3102:
3098:
3090:
3086:
3082:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3069:
3052:
3048:
3040:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3029:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3005:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2986:
2985:
2984:
2980:
2973:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2939:
2937:
2930:
2928:
2921:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2908:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2892:
2888:
2887:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2858:
2848:
2844:
2837:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2825:
2818:
2806:
2798:
2794:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2771:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2761:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2728:
2723:
2717:
2709:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2670:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2610:
2608:
2607:
2603:
2599:
2591:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2566:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2525:
2515:
2511:
2504:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2485:
2484:
2483:
2479:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2465:
2461:
2455:
2449:
2448:
2443:
2439:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2406:
2403:parameter to
2394:
2390:
2386:
2379:
2378:
2372:
2360:
2356:
2348:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2328:
2324:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2312:
2311:
2306:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2293:
2286:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2274:
2273:
2268:
2261:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2238:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2200:
2198:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2181:
2173:
2169:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2084:
2080:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2065:
2061:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2041:Helen Gardner
2038:
2037:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2008:
2005:parameter to
1996:
1992:
1988:
1981:
1980:
1974:
1972:
1971:
1967:
1960:
1959:
1955:No, the word
1953:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1933:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1893:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1863:
1859:
1852:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1819:
1815:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1787:
1783:
1778:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1755:WP:COMMONNAME
1752:
1748:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1718:
1715:parameter to
1706:
1702:
1698:
1691:
1690:
1684:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1630:50.111.63.192
1627:
1620:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1605:WP:Commonname
1602:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1537:
1534:parameter to
1525:
1521:
1517:
1510:
1509:
1503:
1497:
1493:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1457:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1440:
1438:
1434:
1426:Date of death
1425:
1421:
1417:
1410:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:83.100.232.96
1389:
1384:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1341:
1339:
1331:
1325:
1321:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1280:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1251:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1225:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1202:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1170:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1147:
1141:
1140:
1137:
1129:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1114:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1079:
1075:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1055:
1047:
1040:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1019:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1009:
999:
994:
993:
992:
988:
980:
976:
969:
964:
963:
962:
961:
958:
946:
932:
928:
924:
920:
919:
918:
915:
908:
907:WP:CreateLead
904:
903:
902:
898:
894:
889:
885:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
861:
854:
847:
842:
841:
840:
839:
836:
833:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
808:
807:
803:
799:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
762:
759:
752:
746:
742:
735:
730:
723:
722:Emclendon9983
718:
717:
716:
713:
710:
709:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
688:
678:
675:
671:
667:
666:
662:
658:
657:Emclendon9983
647:
644:parameter to
635:
631:
627:
620:
619:
614:
611:
608:
607:
602:
598:
595:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
583:Emclendon9983
574:
571:parameter to
562:
558:
554:
547:
546:
540:
528:
524:
520:
513:
508:
507:
506:
502:
492:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
466:
461:
460:
459:
455:
448:
444:
440:
435:
431:
425:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
406:
400:
396:
392:
386:
381:
380:
379:
375:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
342:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
274:
268:
266:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
229:
225:
216:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
195:
190:
189:
188:
184:
174:
169:
168:
167:
163:
159:
153:
148:
147:
146:
142:
133:
128:
127:
126:
122:
112:
107:
106:
105:
104:
100:
96:
87:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3637:76.179.12.16
3622:76.179.12.16
3619:
3602:Platinum6363
3572:open channel
3571:
3562:
3554:
3532:
3524:
3509:edit request
3461:
3403:
3384:74.14.11.231
3352:74.14.11.231
3349:
3298:
3278:User:Johnbod
3221:
3203:
3194:
3190:
3186:
3184:
3176:
3171:
3167:
3161:
3155:
3151:
3123:
3112:
3094:
2990:70.22.139.70
2972:WP:Consensus
2936:open channel
2935:
2926:
2870:— Preceding
2810:
2730:
2725:
2721:
2614:
2595:
2553:
2552:Do you mean
2532:— Preceding
2529:
2445:
2437:
2412:
2404:
2389:edit request
2346:
2301:
2263:
2259:
2258:
2204:
2185:
2142:
2106:Turtleshell3
2103:
2078:
2068:
2034:
2027:
2006:
1991:edit request
1956:
1954:
1941:
1937:
1870:
1790:
1779:
1776:
1746:
1724:
1716:
1701:edit request
1669:
1624:— Preceding
1583:— Preceding
1580:
1556:
1535:
1520:edit request
1485:lead section
1464:84.119.60.39
1461:
1441:
1437:the footnote
1433:this article
1429:
1386:— Preceding
1381:
1342:
1335:
1227:— Preceding
1209:— Preceding
1206:
1142:
1130:
1122:Ptolemy XIII
1115:
1107:Ptolemy XIII
1100:
1097:
1094:
1090:
950:
887:
827:
796:
779:
767:
763:
756:
734:User:Þjarkur
706:
698:
693:Did you see
677:
669:
653:
645:
630:edit request
604:
580:
572:
557:edit request
471:
437:
433:
321:
311:
303:
281:
272:
245:— Preceding
242:
91:
78:
43:
37:
3017:Zahi Hawass
2749:Ronald Syme
2682:Apoxyomenus
2657:Apoxyomenus
2643:Apoxyomenus
2592:Family Tree
2237:Doric Greek
2232:Koine Greek
1672:Haploidavey
1652:Haploidavey
1557:You&me
1346:Mbarrett710
979:Berenice IV
443:Berenice IV
36:This is an
3563:FlightTime
3517:|answered=
3346:Her father
3205:MaksVerver
3187:definitely
2927:FlightTime
2895:Werner Huß
2696:WP:POPULAR
2678:Pomegranya
2661:Pomegranya
2639:WP:POPULAR
2631:Pomegranya
2617:Pomegranya
2450:using the
2397:|answered=
2086:I Am Chaos
1999:|answered=
1709:|answered=
1528:|answered=
1299:, such as
753:Occupation
670:References
638:|answered=
565:|answered=
308:Old Arabic
3513:Cleopatra
3438:@Peaceray
2576:A. Parrot
2487:Plutarch
2442:consensus
2393:Cleopatra
2285:Caesarion
2079:Not done:
2039:starring
1995:Cleopatra
1851:Gal Gadot
1807:Gal Gadot
1759:RudolfRed
1747:Not done:
1728:Savoy1956
1705:Cleopatra
1524:Cleopatra
1309:Cleopatra
1279:A. Parrot
1260:A. Parrot
1203:Maccabees
1175:Kekki1978
1146:Kekki1978
1133:Kekki1978
1126:civil war
1111:civil war
1064:Kekki1978
1051:Kekki1978
1018:Kekki1978
1005:Kekki1978
968:Kekki1978
954:Kekki1978
923:A. Parrot
911:Kekki1978
874:A. Parrot
813:Surtsicna
729:Caesarion
634:Cleopatra
561:Cleopatra
447:Caesarion
215:Theayeaye
200:Theayeaye
173:Theayeaye
158:Theayeaye
132:Theayeaye
111:Theayeaye
95:Theayeaye
79:Archive 5
73:Archive 4
68:Archive 3
60:Archive 1
3440:thanks!
3425:Peaceray
3382:Got it!
3191:possibly
3152:separate
3101:RMCD bot
3077:Dimadick
2872:unsigned
2635:WP:FORUM
2534:unsigned
2503:Pericles
2489:Braw 420
2419:Braw 420
2304:PizzaMan
2266:PizzaMan
1626:unsigned
1585:unsigned
1388:unsigned
1287:such as
1229:unsigned
1211:unsigned
870:Claudius
708:Thjarkur
695:the note
606:Thjarkur
351:Sabaeans
259:contribs
247:unsigned
3655:Johnbod
3479:Johnbod
3318:Johnbod
3304:Johnbod
3250:em dash
3170:who is
2700:Maxaxa
2554:reigned
2228:Macedon
2121:Johnbod
1958:pharaoh
1914:Johnbod
1603:As per
1481:pharaoh
1445:Avilich
1307:named "
251:Jiowkdl
39:archive
3535:Elbuod
3458:Burial
3442:Lxsdms
3406:Lxsdms
3323:WP:MOS
3254:WP:MOS
2822:(talk)
2447:before
1943:JeffUK
1792:Dmildy
1192:(talk)
893:Avis11
888:active
835:(talk)
798:Avis11
712:(talk)
610:(talk)
601:a note
322:Alilát
318:Al-Lat
278:Greek.
3521:|ans=
3507:This
3297:your
2861:What?
2401:|ans=
2387:This
2145:Nswix
2003:|ans=
1989:This
1713:|ans=
1699:This
1532:|ans=
1518:This
1188:T8612
846:T8612
831:T8612
776:Egypt
701:is a
642:|ans=
628:This
569:|ans=
555:This
363:Ge'ez
302:Even
16:<
3689:talk
3675:talk
3659:talk
3645:talk
3626:talk
3606:talk
3590:talk
3555:Done
3539:talk
3483:talk
3468:talk
3446:talk
3429:talk
3410:talk
3388:talk
3356:talk
3308:talk
3299:only
3209:talk
3081:talk
3015:and
2994:talk
2954:talk
2903:talk
2880:talk
2779:talk
2738:talk
2704:talk
2686:talk
2647:talk
2621:talk
2602:talk
2580:talk
2542:talk
2493:talk
2464:talk
2423:talk
2337:talk
2212:talk
2192:talk
2182:Math
2149:talk
2125:talk
2110:talk
2090:talk
2020:talk
1947:talk
1918:talk
1878:talk
1832:talk
1796:talk
1784:and
1782:here
1763:talk
1732:talk
1676:talk
1656:talk
1634:talk
1613:talk
1593:talk
1567:talk
1549:talk
1468:talk
1449:talk
1396:talk
1350:talk
1264:talk
1237:talk
1219:talk
1178:talk
1136:talk
1054:talk
1046:here
1008:talk
957:talk
927:talk
914:talk
897:talk
878:talk
817:talk
802:talk
794:...
661:talk
603:. –
587:talk
523:talk
480:talk
413:talk
395:talk
359:D'mt
330:talk
293:talk
255:talk
204:talk
162:talk
99:talk
3519:or
3511:to
3156:not
3117:to
2399:or
2391:to
2333:Sca
2309:♨♨♨
2271:♨♨♨
2226:in
2186:Up
2001:or
1993:to
1757:.
1711:or
1703:to
1530:or
1522:to
1311:".
774:of
640:or
632:to
567:or
559:to
432:'s
320:as
313:al-
3691:)
3677:)
3661:)
3647:)
3628:)
3608:)
3592:)
3558:-
3541:)
3525:no
3485:)
3470:)
3448:)
3431:)
3423:.
3412:)
3390:)
3358:)
3310:)
3211:)
3083:)
2996:)
2974:.
2956:)
2905:)
2882:)
2781:)
2740:)
2706:)
2698:.
2688:)
2649:)
2623:)
2604:)
2582:)
2544:)
2495:)
2466:)
2456:}}
2452:{{
2425:)
2405:no
2339:)
2287:.
2214:)
2194:)
2151:)
2127:)
2112:)
2092:)
2022:)
2007:no
1949:)
1920:)
1880:)
1834:)
1798:)
1765:)
1734:)
1717:no
1678:)
1658:)
1636:)
1615:)
1595:)
1569:)
1551:)
1536:no
1470:)
1451:)
1398:)
1352:)
1266:)
1239:)
1131:–
1128:.
1113:.
929:)
899:)
880:)
819:)
804:)
778:.
663:)
646:no
589:)
573:no
525:)
482:)
472:if
415:)
397:)
332:)
304:if
295:)
287:.
261:)
257:•
206:)
164:)
101:)
64:←
3687:(
3673:(
3657:(
3643:(
3635:@
3624:(
3604:(
3588:(
3576:)
3568:(
3537:(
3481:(
3466:(
3444:(
3427:(
3408:(
3386:(
3354:(
3316:@
3306:(
3207:(
3079:(
2992:(
2952:(
2940:)
2932:(
2901:(
2878:(
2834:@
2777:(
2768:@
2736:(
2702:(
2684:(
2659:@
2655:@
2645:(
2619:(
2600:(
2578:(
2540:(
2491:(
2462:(
2421:(
2335:(
2210:(
2190:(
2147:(
2123:(
2108:(
2088:(
2018:(
1945:(
1916:(
1894::
1890:@
1876:(
1830:(
1794:(
1761:(
1730:(
1674:(
1654:(
1632:(
1611:(
1591:(
1565:(
1547:(
1466:(
1447:(
1394:(
1348:(
1281::
1277:@
1262:(
1252::
1248:@
1235:(
1217:(
1171::
1167:@
1148::
1144:@
1066::
1062:@
1041::
1037:@
1020::
1016:@
1000::
996:@
970::
966:@
925:(
895:(
876:(
848::
844:@
815:(
800:(
724::
720:@
691:
659:(
597:
585:(
521:(
514::
510:@
493::
489:@
478:(
467::
463:@
426::
422:@
411:(
393:(
387::
383:@
343::
339:@
328:(
291:(
253:(
217::
213:@
202:(
196::
192:@
175::
171:@
160:(
154::
150:@
134::
130:@
113::
109:@
97:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.