Talk:A History of the Palestinian People

1156:- please take another look regarding the tag you placed. While the book itself is an extremely POV pushing book (as are many books - but this one in particular is mainly about making a point) - I believe the coverage in the Knowledge article is balanced (particularly after I added negative coverage in Arabic sources - the article began in enwiki, was translated to hewiki, grew a bit there following translation, and now I migrated some information back (+added more recent bits such as the Knesset speech)). The current text is roughly split half and half between positive and negative coverage. This isn't "only a joke" - this a point that pro-Jewish writers and politicians (including in a political speech holding up the book in the 1656:

many nearby people - eg Bulgarians and Macedonians (or Romania and Moldova) - where the origin of the split is more political in nature. Is the author a troll? Maybe. Not really relevant to how to write coverage of the book. I will note that his thesis is not that these people do not exist, but that they do not have a history separate from other Arabs jn this region of the Ottoman empire. This is still clearly hateful to many (as evidenced in the expansive negative reactions which are covered). However in terms ofarticle structure we should treat this as any book. We have plenty of articles on books considered hateful by some or even most on wiki.

1052:- if we add "purporting to" on the contents of this book - we would have to do so for any other book covering Palestinian history from a different angle. The claim that there is no Palestinian people (and that they were part of Greater Syria / Levant / etc. - until the arbitrary British mandate lines were set, and that the political movements surrounding the Palestinians were set up by Arab nations in opposition to Israel) - is a long-standing claim by many sources. It might be wrong - but it isn't one without any merit, nor is it a unique claim to this particular author. 1160:) are taking seriously. Conversely pro-Palestinians see this is a continuing Zionist ploy to erase or hide Palestinians, racist, and even going as far as saying "History of the Palestinian People is explicitly intended to reinforce the dehumanization of an entire people in order to grease the machinery of subjugation and ethnic cleansing" - so both sides aren't taking this is a joke. I think the current article is quite balanced in its coverage of an extremely POV polarizing book. 1671:

motivated) - though I was aware of the initialmcoverage buzz pre ban (but it did not motivate me to create an article). The AFD did cause me to invest more time in this article than I would have otherwise. However I do think coverage is balanced. If RSes exist treating this as just a stunt, they could be worked in as an additional angle, however many of the negatives took this book as dead serious - as did many of the positives. The correct thing to do is to follow the sources.

218: 197: 131: 307: 541: 286: 2070:

who think it's racist should be represented in the article with proper sourcing and attribution, not as an undisputed fact like you pretend. Finally, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a complex issue with several perspectives, mutual injustices and responsibilities for its perpetuation, not a matter of victims and oppresors like it was with the Jews of early 20th century Russia. Don't try to equate the two.

902: 317: 428: 407: 121: 438: 103: 72: 21: 2092:

their problem was that they were not persuaded to convert to Orthodox Christianity after countless pogroms and antisemitic laws. Thanks for your insights. I'm sure your manichaeist view will lead you far in life, specially when it comes to this 100-year old conflict. Probably Israel's enemies never tried your approach before.

1297:- which I think is done expansively in the current article). Calling SUSTAINED, on a newish book (with sustained coverage following the publication to present), amounts to a call for a mandatory waiting period for new book articles (e.g. X years following publication), which is not current policy for book articles. 1928:- the view that the Arabs constitute a single nation and denies the unique identity of Jordanians, Palestinians etc.. They may be wrong historically and misguided politically, but that does not make them "racist", any more than Sand is a "racist" for believing the Jewish people are a late "invention". 1524:- there were multiple reviews published - with book review in the title. It is not up to us to judge whether notable people used this book to coatrack. I'll note that if we excise these - we'll actually cut down the negative review section, as the positive endorsements mainly just embraced the message. 2246:

There's a sentence in the criticism section talking about palestinian history dating from the "Stone age, 4000 BCE". This is followed by a "(Sic)", with the "4000 BCE" linked to the bronze age article. I'm guessing this is an edgy way to argue that 4000 BCE belongs to the Bronze Age - except that the

1770:

To your question at the end, what the Protocols article doesn’t do is juxtapose “support” and “criticism”; this article does so, and it is structured as if this is a review of the next installment of Harry Potter. My proposal is to restructure the article to make it clear that supporters of this book

1670:

On a personal note, what got me interested here was the Amazon ban (contrasted with other decisions by Amazon) the campign leading to the ban, and some of the negative reactions. Had this not occured, it probably would not have interested me so much (and I will note some of the coverage was similarly

1655:

The question of whether the book's thesis has any merit is really immaterial to the structure of the article. I will note that the basic thesis of whether a Palestinian people as a separate people (from greater Syria) has some merit - based on history and linguistics - however the same may be said of

1622:

A comment on the comparison with Sand's book and the corresponding Knowledge article. Much of the commentary in the article on that book comes from historians, geneticists and so on. They are proper reviews of the evidence presented in the book, its thesis and so on. People agree or disagree with the

2091:

Well, I didnt know Jews in Russia wanted to destroy that country (or even create a separate State within the empire), represented a demographic threat and had a long history of bombing buses and schools, firing rockets on Russian civilians and cutting babies' throats in their cribs. I simply thought

2069:

As I said before, I don't support the premise of this "book", but saying there is no Palestinian people or they don't have a national history is not necessarily a racist position. It's not necessarily motivated by race animosity, but an incorrect understanding of peoplehood, in my opinion. And those

1841:

Your comment invented a thesis for a blank book. And then extrapolated the fantasy to compare it to a carefully scholarly work by a Professor of History at Tel Aviv University. This book was literally blank, other than a quote implying Palestinians are dishonest people. Comments from the author make

1399:

To the contrary - censorship/banning of a book only makes the book more significant, as per the controversy of such a move and the coverage it has received. This wasn't "spontaneously" removed - removal followed a fairly wide campaign by activists against sale on Amazon. (I'll note I'm not sure from

2113:

You would have a different view if you took the time to do some reading. The Tsarists absolutely thought that the Jews in the Russian Empire "wanted to destroy that country (or even create a separate State within the empire), represented a demographic threat and ." Remember they blamed Jews for the

2073:

I suggest you try reading late 19th / early 20th century Russian history. Tsarist Russians considered that the conflict with the newly-nationalist Jewish communities was "a complex issue with several perspectives, mutual injustices and responsibilities for its perpetuation, not a matter of victims

1766:

Please can we not debate which is a worse form of racism – competitive victimhood is not healthy. It risks insulting people on either side – for example your comment (presumably accidentally) implied that anti-Palestinian racism is banal, as opposed to being a dehumanizing tool used to support the

1740:

Although I do agree that the idea the book is trying to portray in a humoristic manner is mistaken (just like is a mistake when pro-Palestinian activists try to deny Jewish connection and indigenuity to the land of Israel), comparing this with a forgery written by the czarist police that portrayed

1556:

follow a rather standard structure: you describe the book contents and writers, information on publication, and you provided a blanaced analysis of its reception. That's the accepted structure, articles on books don't generally go into the merits of the premise of the book but just note how others

1318:

its first printing run (and was on sale in various locations until this happened). I will note that per my understanding (from the Author's facebook page and other such coverage in blogs and less reliable sources (IIRC - there is a funding driving for this) - so this is not in the article (yet)) -

1175:

I still think the article has some NPOV issues that warrant retention of the NPOV tag for now, though the recent additions have been an improvement. I am currently considering putting this article up for AFD, if I don't do that I will probably be doing some editing of the article myself to address

1794:

If there are any "support" opinions for the Protocols forgery, you can add them to that article. As the above poster wrote, trying to compare a work of satire with a well known forgery attempting to promote a wild conspiracy theory as if it were fact makes me wonder about your competency to edit

1688:

I agree that the article should exist. But the book was only released two months ago. In my opinion, it was a little to premature to write an article about it. As Kingsindian alludes to "the integration of Know Your Meme into Knowledge", the Knowledge article itself becomes part of the publicity

1638:

If you really want to look at why the Israeli right (or other parts of the spectrum, as evidenced by the Golda Meir quote) subscribe to some version of the thesis "there are no Palestinian people", why not simply do it? Perhaps some version of the thesis is even historically defensible. There is

1574:

I do not write this sort of thing, but I am very pissed off so I will. I just realized that it was nominated for DYK, so I am super angry. It is irrational to be angry at a troll (the author), so I will take a break from this article for a couple of weeks and then see if I am still angry. In the

1426:

Removing POV tag. Tag is supported by a single editor who has not offered an argument that addresses the article's POV; his arguments solely address notability. Moreover, while the book is a sort of political polemic, the article has been expanded and as it now stands is neutrally phrased and

1633:

The book is indeed serious, as the author insists it is. So, the author is seriously arguing that there is absolutely no history of the Palestinian people: they don't exist. The people who lived there, who had parents and grandparents and land and livestock and houses, and those who lived and

1400:

what I see in the sources if Barnes and Noble (who started selling after the Amazon ban, probably the leftovers from the run - also at a brisk pace per the sources) removed this for sale for the same reason, or because they sold out the print run - so it really is one very major bookstore).

1473:

There cannot be any "review" of an empty book. Therefore, talking about "mixed reviews" is meaningless. The "reviews" are simply people who are using the occasion to comment on the implied theory behind the book ("there are no Palestinians"). Again, these matters should not be discussed

1795:

here. That this book is "racist" is an opinion, not a fact, and that opinion is well represented in the article. Its thesis, presented in a satirical format, is that the Palestinian people did not develop a national identity until a fairly recent date. It may be wrong, but much like

1537:

There actually were a couple of serious academics who responded - for instance Steven Weitzman. I don't think it is up to us to summarize the relevant history - the current article stays away from this issue entirely - only summarizing what was written on the book. For instance in

1481:

and silly. Quoting Newt Gingrich on Palestine is like quoting me on Justin Bieber. Yeah, Gingrich has a PhD in European history (his dissertation was on Belgium), but his pronouncements on a cable TV channel carry no weight whatsoever. It's rather sad that I have to say this at

1107:

You have a point as the author does not advance this arguement in the book (even not in a single page), but rather outside of the book. Had this arguement been raised even briefly in the book I would have contested your arguement, but as it is not I added purpoting back

1741:

Jews as evil monsters whose objective was to rule over the entire world is nothing less than a banalization of antisemitism. Also it's not clear what is your complaint since the article on the Protocols mentions plenty of endorsements, from Henry Ford to the Nazis.

1332: 2247:

Bronze Age article itself does not support this, as the bronze age starts in 3300 BCE. On the contrary, the Stone Age ends around 4000 BCE Thus, because 4000 BCE is indeed the Stone Age, I believe the sic should be removed, and bronze age link removed as well.

985:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not

41: 1512:

Where do you see coatrack claims? All claims of existence/non-existence of Palestinians are sourced to critiques of the book in RS. The "point" of this book per the author was to assert the non-existence - which has led to either endorsements or

695: 1639:

plenty of stuff written by actual historians, anthropologists, geneticists, sociologists and so on. You might even learn something if you read it. Why do you spend your time transcribing the verbal diarrhoea of ignoramuses into Knowledge?

1293:. Just because a book is perceived by some (or even many) to be racist and offensive is not a reason to delete - nor is such a personal perception a reasonable basis for editorial decisions (though said perception should be covered per 1845:

And noone is at a loss to explain the cherry-picked comments of a poorly educated militant in 1977. What makes you consider him to be a scholar of Palestinian history – that reflects extremely poor judgement of what is a reliable

1516:

Please suggest an alternative to pro-Jewish and pro-Palestinian - the book was praised in the obvious places, and criticized in the obvious places - all per the partisan leaning of the sources in question. How would you term

1976:- it is called satire. The former is not a "sexist" or "misandrist" book, and the latter is not a "speciesist" book. You may believe the joke is in bad taste, but you can't label the book as 'racist" in Knowledge's voice. 1542:(which Weitzman campared this book to) article - we don't have a short neutralish description of the history of the Jewish people - we describe the contents of the book (Sand's premise) and then reactions to the book. 1834:

The anon poster above already pointed out that there were support opinions among anti-semites for the Protocols. Just as there are racist support opinions here. Yet they are presented differently, for no explainable

1881:

Simply re-asserting that this is an " obviously racist publication" is unlikely to convince anyone. It is an opinion, one that is well represented in the article. Your "poorly educated militant" was the leader of

1447:

I was only aware today of this article. Apparently, it was decided that the book is notable, at least for now, since the stunt seems to have gotten coverage. Of course, this is one more step in the integration of

839: 51: 1364:

A book doesn't have to be on sale currently, but when major booksellers have deleted it from their websites only a week after it was first published, I think it's fair to say it has no lasting significance.

1943:

That nationalisms are late inventions is the clear mainstream position. Nothing racist about that, whether we are talking about the Palestinian nation, the Arab nation, or the modern Jewish nation.

705: 1090:

to cover the history etc., whereas it would indeed not be our place to assess how well actual history books (again, this isn't one -- it contains no history of any kind) cover their subjects.

621: 1194:(1) - significantly exceeding "The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself", besides passing on 2184:'s website and this is still in a ridiculous state. The ahistorical and racist idea that the Palestinians are devoid of history has been persistent in the Israeli right and even centre 1602:

from a blogger there. Considering that the outlet actively tried to promote the book (and boasts about it), one could talk about the wisdom of including it in the article, but whatever.

1890:- you know, the officially recognized "sole representative of the Palestinian people”. If he states the Palestinians did not exist, you'd be hard pressed to call that position racsist. 2099: 1748: 1319:

there is an additional print run planned in English for a special "UNESCO edition". In any event - being on sale currently in not a criteria for book articles (or GNG in general) -

1909:

is?! As-Sa'iqa fought for pan-Arab unification – militants will say whatever suits their cause. Honestly I am struggling to remember a more absurd line of argument than this one.

1093:

I would like to hear whether you agree with this reasoning. If you do, let's add 'purporting to cover' back. If not, do offer counter-arguments, or we can seek a third opinion.

2188:- to the extent of being the norm in public discourse -, and we need a background section to cover the intellectual history of this idea. This book did not pop out of a vacuum. 1488:

We can give a short and neutral summary of the relevant history. As far as I can see, no reputable historian has commented on the stunt, which is like the dog that didn't bark.

1078:

history, and does not even make that argument about whether or not Palestinians constitute a people. It is a practical joke -- a book with empty pages, to correspond with the

994:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.

606: 1548:

Finally - claiming an item with pages, an ISBN, sold as a book, and described as a book - is anything but a book and treating it in a manner other than any other book is pure

1491:

The "reaction" section is mostly sourced to blogs. Most of them are worthless and trivia. Amazon's banning, Voll's complaint, and Amazon's response should be noted. That's it.

722: 567: 1575:

meantime, I'll make some specific comments, and then some general comments. Just think about what I am saying, no response is required; though you can respond if you want.

1290:

from its publication which is continuing through this week - e.g. items on Kenesset speech with the book and the unrelated coverage in the Bosnian newspaper from 15 July -

2354: 1771:

are not mainstream commentators and are taking a racist position – just as it is clear to readers of the Protocols article that Henry Ford and the Nazis were antisemites.

807: 379: 1619:

Only the FrontPageMag source is a sort of "review". By a totally unqualified person, who has been given too much space in the Knowledge article to spout his inanities.

1953:, with a comment about their honesty, and then all blank pages. If you don’t think that would be widely considered racist, then why don’t you publish it and find out. 2369: 1600: 1553: 484: 2074:

and oppressors". No oppressor group thinks they are the oppressor at the time – blaming the victims is normal course. Only the long arc of history makes it clear.

714: 1722:

is an archetypal example of a racist hoax, and I don’t see a “support” section in there bringing together all the racist commentary available on the internet.

1552:. While it might be a personal opinion that this is a stunt - we should follow the sources - as we do in any other book which has received reviews. Articles on 636: 792: 2349: 2339: 777: 561: 268: 258: 756: 739: 389: 2285:

Didn't you forget to remove the "bronze age" link from 4000 BCE (which is incorrect)? Or did someone put it back up? It looks like it is still there

2010:"Of course it is " is not an argument , just a restatement of your personal opinion.. The author is a male, in case you didn't notice. And if it was 2364: 2344: 1578:

My position is that the article should cover the book as a stunt and the reaction to it, its banning by Amazon and so on. That is the "story" here.

1198:. AFDing this would have no merit. Regarding NPOV tags - please state specifically what the problem is (or work to improve whatever issues you see). 1477:

The long and ignorant paragraph from Avi Lieberman in FrontPageMag, who has no qualifications in history (he is a lawyer), is to be removed. It is

2359: 2115: 494: 351: 628: 2146:

Competitive victimhood will not get us anywhere. Understanding requires seeing the perspective of the other side, not repetition of your own.

1586: 1838:

All claims are racism and anti-semitism are opinions. These are both obviously racist publications – amongst reasonable person this is a fact

1697:. I think Knowledge should have a policy that you can't write articles about "borderline noteworthy" material younger than six months or so. 234: 2374: 2334: 355: 1623:

thesis; this is as it should be. This procedure cannot be done with an empty book; people simply read whatever they want to read into it.

1086:", when it literally contains nothing but a single quote from Seinfeld. I maintain that in this case, it is NPOV to assert that the book 2329: 1718: 731: 151: 1797: 1539: 1887: 1646: 1501: 1464: 645: 460: 1531:. He's a long-running writer on middle east issues - I don't see any particular reason to excise his review - other than IDONTLIKE. 1801:

which it closely resembles (in position, not genre) , it is not inherently racist. If it were, one would be at a loss to explain

334:, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic 225: 202: 155: 2207:

is a far-right channel; if we are saying that it was positively reviewed in the venue, we must qualify the nature of the media.

2103: 1752: 786: 772: 347: 330: 291: 2324: 1716:

Is there any reason why this article should be written in a different tone versus our articles on other racist hoaxes? The

1545:

What's the "reaction" section? You mean "Removal from sale"? Please point out which sources you think should be struck out.

1630:

The book is not serious, and so it is trolling people. Should we be writing a "review" of a troll, like every other book?

955: 926: 912: 799: 553: 451: 412: 83: 1291: 691: 615: 145: 108: 1082:

non-existent history in the title. We should not mislead Knowledge's readers by asserting as fact that this book is

2299:

Yeah, the source doesn't appear to give a date for the Bronze Age, this was some editor's misreport. It's gone now.

1599:

Even Jewish Press source cited is not a review. It's talking about the book's sales and reaction. The only "review"

1026:

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

1014: 951: 765: 655: 1995:, it would absolutely be widely considered sexist. Your unconscious biases are being revealed in this discussion. 916: 27: 2125:

Please try to learn more, and I promise the hatred will dissipate and the understanding of the other will grow.

2037:. I recommend you think carefully about how exactly you came to be unaware that satire can be racist or sexist. 1534:

There's no reason not to summarize the critiques provided in X,Y,Z and A,B,C - it is what we do for other books.

2290: 2276: 2252: 2143:(followed by numerous Palestinian celebrations) was a libel. I thought it was factual, but whatever. I'm done. 598: 2118:(this triggered the first true pogroms), and to your point about babies in cribs, have you never heard of the 997:

Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

978: 930: 683: 590: 2286: 2272: 2248: 2226: 2212: 2193: 2151: 2130: 2082: 2042: 2000: 1958: 1914: 1855: 1776: 1730: 1006: 943: 954:

may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the

2014:

it would similarly absolutely be satire. Your biases are as clear, as is your lack of a sense of humor.

1643: 1634:

reproduced and worked with and fought against Jews and other Arabs and the British do not count. At all.

1498: 1463:

about claims about whether the Palestinian people existed or not. There is already an article about the

1432: 824: 748: 89: 1626:

Finally, I hope you think about what you are doing. There are two coherent ways of treating the book:

2181: 2095: 1744: 1320: 159: 71: 20: 2303: 2294: 2280: 2266: 2256: 2230: 2216: 2197: 2155: 2134: 2107: 2086: 2046: 2023: 2019: 2004: 1985: 1981: 1962: 1937: 1933: 1918: 1899: 1895: 1859: 1813: 1809: 1780: 1756: 1734: 1706: 1680: 1665: 1649: 1566: 1504: 1436: 1409: 1374: 1370: 1343: 1306: 1257: 1253: 1233: 1229: 1221: 1207: 1185: 1181: 1169: 1131: 1117: 1102: 1061: 1010: 947: 1589:

is not a review, but coverage of the book's sales and the subsequent ban. This comes closest to a

459:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

233:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1478: 1460: 919:, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: 343: 339: 335: 1605:

I don't consider Arutz Sheva to be RS for anything involving Palestinians, so I didn't read it.

1470:"Pro-Jewish" and "pro-Palestine" and weasel words which are meaningless. They should be excised. 1767:

continued subjugation, dispossession and effective imprisonment of millions of innocent people.

2222: 2208: 2189: 2147: 2126: 2078: 2038: 1996: 1954: 1910: 1851: 1772: 1726: 1702: 1676: 1661: 1562: 1405: 1339: 1328: 1302: 1248:

I think I am going to put this up for AFD, as it appears the book is no longer even for sale.

1203: 1165: 1113: 1057: 671: 576: 1640: 1596:

The "Hamodia" article is not a review. I have never heard of "Hamodia" before, but whatever.

1495: 1428: 1294: 1287: 1282:(and in fact, many books with Wiki articles would fail were sustained applied). That aside, 1005:

procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the

687: 322: 2140: 1279: 1275: 1191: 1002: 859: 833: 667: 651: 163: 1084:"covering the History of the Palestinian People from the dawn of humanity to present day 217: 196: 2015: 1977: 1929: 1891: 1805: 1449: 1366: 1249: 1225: 1177: 1127: 1098: 816: 540: 1452:

into Knowledge, but what can one do. One can revisit the issue a few months from now.

936:

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

2318: 2300: 2263: 1946:

Stating that a people have no history at all, and that they are dishonest, is racist.

1606: 1195: 679: 675: 443: 2221:

Btw, you cannot really "review" an empty book: the positive reviews are basically .

1485:

We can note that the stunt was praised in X, Y, Z venues, and criticized in A, B, C.

1017:. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. 130: 1698: 1672: 1657: 1612:

I can't read the Channel 20 source, because it is in Hebrew, and I don't much care.

1590: 1558: 1549: 1528: 1521: 1401: 1335: 1331:) 07:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC) (Seems there is some non-blog coverage for this - e.g. 1324: 1298: 1199: 1161: 1151: 1109: 1069: 1053: 1020: 901: 663: 136: 1924:

As-Sa'iqa fought for pan-Arab unification, as did many other groups who espoused

2119: 2034: 2030: 1949:

To change the subject, imagine for a moment pulling the same awful stunt called

1925: 696:

Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran

306: 285: 1725:

The way this article is currently written seems to normalize the unacceptable.

1906: 1883: 867: 659: 433: 312: 230: 126: 1694: 1690: 1123: 1094: 1047: 982:

related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.

863: 427: 406: 30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 2262:

I removed it, but I'd prefer to get rid of this crappy article altogether.

586: 582: 1842:

clear his thesis that the Palestinians do not exist as a people, even now.

120: 102: 1157: 150:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can 699: 456: 1520:

Reviews - claiming that there can't be a review of an empty book is

1312: 840:

Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People

1427:

offers a balanced summary of both positive and negative responses.

915:

procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the

2077:

That you don’t see the racism in this book is frightening to me.

1968:'The "same awful stunt" has been pulled off in blank books like 1615:

One statement is by a Knesset MP: that is not a "review" either.

896: 65: 15: 975:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace

1074:

There is a difference of kind here: this book does not tell

1689:

stunt. The book in itself is a clever political variant of

1019:

Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the

1802: 972:

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

942:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

1581:

Most of the "reviews" in the section are not "reviews".

1527:

Lieberman's in-depth and long piece appeared also in the

1467:. This article is about the book and the reception to it. 1041:

purporting to cover the History of the Palestinian People

229:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 529: 524: 519: 514: 929:

to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for

1278:. There is no requirement for sustained coverage in 622:

Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005

455:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 706:Articles needing translation from Hebrew Knowledge 1554:Knowledge:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article 162:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1334:- but not at a level I'd put in the article). 8: 1311:Regarding for sale - the Hebrew is on sale ( 793:Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries 1991:Of course that is sexist. Again, if it was 2093: 1970:What Every Man Thinks About Apart from Sex 1742: 1284:this book is generating sustained coverage 960: 723:Israel articles missing geocoordinate data 607:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration 568:Unknown-importance Israel-related articles 548:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 502: 401: 280: 191: 158:. To use this banner, please refer to the 97: 2355:Low-importance Palestine-related articles 2012:What Every Woman Thinks About Apart from 1993:What Every Woman Thinks About Apart from 808:Knowledge requested photographs in Israel 1455:In the meantime, I have a few comments: 990:With respect to the WP:1RR restriction: 156:discuss matters related to book articles 2242:Misplaced Sic and wrong Bronze Age link 2116:Assassination of Alexander II of Russia 403: 282: 193: 164:relevant guideline for the type of work 99: 69: 2370:Low-importance Israel-related articles 1886:, one of the founding factions of the 1712:Comparing against other racist hoaxes 350:, where you can add your name to the 7: 908:Warning: active arbitration remedies 449:This article is within the scope of 328:This article is within the scope of 223:This article is within the scope of 142:This article is within the scope of 1719:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion 933:, provided they are not disruptive) 637:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel 88:It is of interest to the following 2350:B-Class Palestine-related articles 2340:Low-importance Arab world articles 1798:The Invention of the Jewish People 1540:The Invention of the Jewish People 778:Knowledge requested maps in Israel 562:Unassessed Israel-related articles 346:on Knowledge. Join us by visiting 14: 1888:Palestine Liberation Organization 1465:History of the Palestinian people 1314:). I believe the English version 757:Israel articles needing attention 740:Israel articles needing infoboxes 2271:Thank you, and I agree with you 2100:2A01:73C0:600:AD4E:0:0:9399:BB0D 1749:2A01:73C0:600:AD4E:0:0:9399:BB0D 900: 583:Cleanup listing for this project 539: 436: 426: 405: 354:where you can contribute to the 315: 305: 284: 243:Knowledge:WikiProject Arab world 216: 195: 129: 119: 101: 70: 19: 2365:B-Class Israel-related articles 2345:WikiProject Arab world articles 2180:I was led to this article from 773:Module:Location map/data/Israel 489:This article has been rated as 384:This article has been rated as 364:Knowledge:WikiProject Palestine 263:This article has been rated as 246:Template:WikiProject Arab world 26:This article was nominated for 2360:WikiProject Palestine articles 720:Add geographic coordinates to 634:Participate in discussions at 367:Template:WikiProject Palestine 1: 2156:07:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2135:01:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2108:01:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2087:00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2047:17:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2024:12:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 2005:07:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1986:01:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1974:Why Dogs are Better than Cats 1963:01:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1938:01:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1919:00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1900:00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1860:00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1814:00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1781:00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 1757:23:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC) 1735:08:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC) 956:contentious topics procedures 463:and see a list of open tasks. 237:and see a list of open tasks. 805:Add pictures to articles in 469:Knowledge:WikiProject Israel 2375:WikiProject Israel articles 2335:B-Class Arab world articles 1274:That would be relevant for 1190:This article clearly meets 1176:the remaining NPOV issues. 692:Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu 472:Template:WikiProject Israel 172:Knowledge:WikiProject Books 2391: 2330:WikiProject Books articles 2304:14:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2295:12:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC) 2281:08:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) 2267:02:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC) 2231:18:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC) 2217:10:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC) 2198:10:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC) 1707:16:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 1681:13:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 1666:13:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 1650:11:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC) 1567:15:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC) 1505:15:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC) 925:You must be logged-in and 775:. Add maps to articles in 656:Diamond industry in Israel 495:project's importance scale 390:project's importance scale 370:Palestine-related articles 269:project's importance scale 175:Template:WikiProject Books 2257:20:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC) 1951:A history of Black people 1557:have reacted to the book. 1437:19:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC) 1410:08:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1375:08:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1344:08:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1307:07:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1258:07:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1234:07:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1208:05:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1186:05:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC) 1170:14:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC) 1062:05:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 958:before editing this page. 501: 488: 421: 383: 300: 262: 211: 114: 96: 40:, 16 September 2020, see 2139:Sorry, i didnt know the 1459:There should not be any 1132:05:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 1118:03:26, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 1103:01:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 1015:normal editorial process 952:normal editorial process 715:Geographical coordinates 1021:Arbitration enforcement 684:Public Defence (Israel) 585:is available. See also 475:Israel-related articles 1905:Have you no idea what 1011:standards of behaviour 948:standards of behaviour 226:WikiProject Arab world 78:This article is rated 2325:B-Class Book articles 917:Arab–Israeli conflict 506:Project Israel To Do: 331:WikiProject Palestine 2186:for a very long time 1007:purpose of Knowledge 1001:After being warned, 944:purpose of Knowledge 931:making edit requests 591:the tool's wiki page 587:the list by category 50:, 19 July 2017, see 1831:Please try harder: 1585:The Jerusalem Post 965:Further information 855:Translate to Hebrew 249:Arab world articles 1513:counter-arguments. 1286:- it has received 1003:contentious topics 981: 979:make edit requests 927:extended-confirmed 913:contentious topics 909: 771:See discussion at 452:WikiProject Israel 344:State of Palestine 340:Palestinian people 84:content assessment 2110: 2098:comment added by 1759: 1747:comment added by 1035: 1034: 1031: 1030: 976: 907: 895: 894: 891: 890: 887: 886: 883: 882: 879: 878: 737:Add infoboxes to 700:Pre-Modern Aliyah 672:Sephardic Haredim 400: 399: 396: 395: 279: 278: 275: 274: 190: 189: 186: 185: 146:WikiProject Books 64: 63: 60: 59: 2382: 1443:Various comments 1155: 1073: 1051: 961: 904: 897: 688:Prisoner of Zion 629:Deletion sorting 543: 536: 535: 503: 477: 476: 473: 470: 467: 446: 441: 440: 439: 430: 423: 422: 417: 409: 402: 372: 371: 368: 365: 362: 348:the project page 325: 323:Palestine portal 320: 319: 318: 309: 302: 301: 296: 288: 281: 251: 250: 247: 244: 241: 220: 213: 212: 207: 199: 192: 180: 179: 176: 173: 170: 152:join the project 139: 134: 133: 123: 116: 115: 105: 98: 81: 75: 74: 66: 32: 31: 23: 16: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2315: 2314: 2287:DommageCritique 2273:DommageCritique 2249:DommageCritique 2244: 2182:Volunteer Marek 2178: 2141:Itamar massacre 1714: 1609:agrees with me. 1593:, but whatever. 1445: 1149: 1147: 1067: 1045: 1043: 1027: 1009:, any expected 966: 946:, any expected 939: 875: 860:David Bar-Hayim 668:Rami Kleinstein 652:Ayala Procaccia 604:Participate in 534: 474: 471: 468: 465: 464: 442: 437: 435: 415: 369: 366: 363: 360: 359: 352:list of members 321: 316: 314: 294: 248: 245: 242: 239: 238: 205: 177: 174: 171: 168: 167: 135: 128: 82:on Knowledge's 79: 12: 11: 5: 2388: 2386: 2378: 2377: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2327: 2317: 2316: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2123: 2075: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 1947: 1944: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1836: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1768: 1761: 1760: 1713: 1710: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1617: 1616: 1613: 1610: 1603: 1597: 1594: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1546: 1543: 1535: 1532: 1525: 1518: 1514: 1493: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1450:Know Your Meme 1444: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1309: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1122:Thank you. :) 1091: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1018: 999: 998: 995: 988: 987: 983: 971: 968: 967: 964: 938: 937: 934: 922: 905: 893: 892: 889: 888: 885: 884: 881: 880: 877: 876: 874: 873: 872: 871: 850: 842: 829: 812: 795: 782: 761: 744: 727: 710: 702: 641: 624: 611: 594: 572: 547: 545: 544: 533: 532: 527: 522: 517: 511: 508: 507: 499: 498: 491:Low-importance 487: 481: 480: 478: 461:the discussion 448: 447: 431: 419: 418: 416:Low‑importance 410: 398: 397: 394: 393: 386:Low-importance 382: 376: 375: 373: 327: 326: 310: 298: 297: 295:Low‑importance 289: 277: 276: 273: 272: 265:Low-importance 261: 255: 254: 252: 235:the discussion 221: 209: 208: 206:Low‑importance 200: 188: 187: 184: 183: 181: 141: 140: 124: 112: 111: 106: 94: 93: 87: 76: 62: 61: 58: 57: 56: 55: 45: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2387: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2353: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2343: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2333: 2331: 2328: 2326: 2323: 2322: 2320: 2305: 2302: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2241: 2239: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2175: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2121: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2068: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1885: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1832: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1799: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1723: 1721: 1720: 1711: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1624: 1620: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1541: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321:WP:NOTCATALOG 1317: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1153: 1144: 1142: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1040: 1038: 1025: 1022: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 996: 993: 992: 991: 984: 980: 974: 973: 970: 969: 963: 962: 959: 957: 953: 949: 945: 940: 935: 932: 928: 924: 923: 920: 918: 914: 906: 903: 899: 898: 869: 865: 861: 858: 856: 852: 851: 849: 847: 843: 841: 838: 836: 835: 830: 827: 826: 821: 819: 818: 813: 810: 809: 804: 802: 801: 796: 794: 791: 789: 788: 783: 780: 779: 774: 770: 768: 767: 762: 759: 758: 753: 751: 750: 745: 742: 741: 736: 734: 733: 728: 725: 724: 719: 717: 716: 711: 708: 707: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 680:Nachum Heiman 677: 676:Zman Tel Aviv 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 650: 648: 647: 642: 639: 638: 633: 631: 630: 625: 623: 620: 618: 617: 612: 609: 608: 603: 601: 600: 595: 592: 588: 584: 581: 579: 578: 573: 570: 569: 564: 563: 558: 556: 555: 550: 549: 546: 542: 538: 537: 531: 528: 526: 523: 521: 518: 516: 513: 512: 510: 509: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 486: 483: 482: 479: 462: 458: 454: 453: 445: 444:Israel portal 434: 432: 429: 425: 424: 420: 414: 411: 408: 404: 391: 387: 381: 378: 377: 374: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 332: 324: 313: 311: 308: 304: 303: 299: 293: 290: 287: 283: 270: 266: 260: 257: 256: 253: 236: 232: 228: 227: 222: 219: 215: 214: 210: 204: 201: 198: 194: 182: 178:Book articles 165: 161: 160:documentation 157: 153: 149: 148: 147: 138: 132: 127: 125: 122: 118: 117: 113: 110: 107: 104: 100: 95: 91: 85: 77: 73: 68: 67: 53: 49: 46: 43: 39: 36: 35: 34: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2245: 2237: 2223:TrangaBellam 2209:TrangaBellam 2204: 2190:TrangaBellam 2185: 2179: 2148:Onceinawhile 2127:Onceinawhile 2094:— Preceding 2079:Onceinawhile 2039:Onceinawhile 2011: 2009: 1997:Onceinawhile 1992: 1973: 1969: 1967: 1955:Onceinawhile 1950: 1923: 1911:Onceinawhile 1880: 1852:Onceinawhile 1796: 1793: 1773:Onceinawhile 1743:— Preceding 1727:Onceinawhile 1724: 1717: 1715: 1687: 1637: 1625: 1621: 1618: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1529:Jewish Voice 1494: 1454: 1446: 1315: 1283: 1222:WP:SUSTAINED 1148: 1140: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1044: 1036: 1023:noticeboard. 1000: 989: 941: 921: 910: 854: 853: 845: 844: 832: 831: 825:Israel stubs 823: 815: 814: 806: 798: 797: 785: 784: 776: 764: 763: 755: 747: 746: 738: 730: 729: 721: 713: 712: 704: 664:Levin Kipnis 644: 643: 635: 627: 626: 614: 613: 605: 597: 596: 575: 574: 566: 560: 552: 551: 490: 450: 385: 338:region, the 329: 264: 224: 144: 143: 137:Books portal 90:WikiProjects 48:no consensus 47: 37: 2120:Blood libel 2035:Sexist joke 2031:Ethnic joke 1926:pan-Arabism 1641:Kingsindian 1496:Kingsindian 1479:WP:COATRACK 1461:WP:COATRACK 1429:E.M.Gregory 599:Collaborate 356:discussions 2319:Categories 868:Guy Oseary 660:Edna Arbel 240:Arab world 231:Arab world 203:Arab world 52:discussion 42:discussion 2205:Channel20 2016:Inf-in MD 1978:Inf-in MD 1930:Inf-in MD 1907:Ba'athism 1892:Inf-in MD 1884:As-Sa'iqa 1806:Inf-in MD 1691:John Cage 1367:Gatoclass 1295:WP:WEIGHT 1288:WP:SIGCOV 1250:Gatoclass 1226:Gatoclass 1178:Gatoclass 1080:allegedly 1013:, or any 986:required. 950:, or any 864:Guy Bavli 703:See also 559:Rate the 361:Palestine 336:Palestine 292:Palestine 2096:unsigned 1745:unsigned 1316:sold out 1280:WP:NBOOK 1276:WP:BLP1E 1192:WP:NBOOK 1145:NPOV tag 1088:purports 977:only to 749:Maintain 616:Copyedit 342:and the 28:deletion 2176:Comment 1699:ImTheIP 1673:Icewhiz 1658:Icewhiz 1587:article 1559:Icewhiz 1402:Icewhiz 1336:Icewhiz 1325:Icewhiz 1299:Icewhiz 1200:Icewhiz 1162:Icewhiz 1158:Knesset 1152:Yoninah 1110:Icewhiz 1070:Icewhiz 1054:Icewhiz 732:Infobox 577:Cleanup 520:history 493:on the 388:on the 267:on the 80:B-class 2203:Also, 1846:source 1835:reason 1607:WP:RSN 1196:WP:GNG 866:, and 834:Update 646:Expand 554:Assess 466:Israel 457:Israel 413:Israel 86:scale. 2122:myth? 1695:4'33" 1591:WP:RS 1550:WP:OR 1522:WP:OR 1517:them? 1474:here. 846:Other 817:Stubs 800:Photo 530:purge 525:watch 169:Books 109:Books 2301:Zero 2291:talk 2277:talk 2264:Zero 2253:talk 2227:talk 2213:talk 2194:talk 2152:talk 2131:talk 2104:talk 2083:talk 2043:talk 2033:and 2029:See 2020:talk 2001:talk 1982:talk 1959:talk 1934:talk 1915:talk 1896:talk 1856:talk 1810:talk 1803:this 1777:talk 1753:talk 1731:talk 1703:talk 1677:talk 1662:talk 1563:talk 1482:all. 1433:talk 1406:talk 1371:talk 1340:talk 1329:talk 1303:talk 1254:talk 1230:talk 1220:See 1204:talk 1182:talk 1166:talk 1128:talk 1124:Ijon 1114:talk 1099:talk 1095:Ijon 1058:talk 1048:Ijon 911:The 822:See 787:NPOV 754:See 589:and 565:and 515:edit 154:and 38:Keep 1972:or 1693:'s 1108:in. 1076:any 766:Map 485:Low 380:Low 259:Low 2321:: 2293:) 2279:) 2255:) 2229:) 2215:) 2196:) 2154:) 2133:) 2106:) 2085:) 2045:) 2022:) 2003:) 1984:) 1961:) 1936:) 1917:) 1898:) 1858:) 1812:) 1779:) 1755:) 1733:) 1705:) 1679:) 1664:) 1565:) 1435:) 1408:) 1373:) 1342:) 1305:) 1256:) 1232:) 1224:. 1206:) 1184:) 1168:) 1130:) 1116:) 1101:) 1060:) 862:, 698:, 694:, 690:, 686:, 682:, 678:, 674:, 670:, 666:, 662:, 658:, 654:, 2289:( 2275:( 2251:( 2225:( 2211:( 2192:( 2150:( 2129:( 2102:( 2081:( 2041:( 2018:( 1999:( 1980:( 1957:( 1932:( 1913:( 1894:( 1854:( 1808:( 1775:( 1751:( 1729:( 1701:( 1675:( 1660:( 1647:♚ 1644:♝ 1561:( 1502:♚ 1499:♝ 1431:( 1404:( 1369:( 1338:( 1327:( 1323:. 1301:( 1252:( 1228:( 1202:( 1180:( 1164:( 1154:: 1150:@ 1126:( 1112:( 1097:( 1072:: 1068:@ 1056:( 1050:: 1046:@ 870:. 857:: 848:: 837:: 828:. 820:: 811:. 803:: 790:: 781:. 769:: 760:. 752:: 743:. 735:: 726:. 718:: 709:. 649:: 640:. 632:: 619:: 610:. 602:: 593:. 580:: 571:. 557:: 497:. 392:. 358:. 271:. 166:. 92:: 54:. 44:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index