210:
192:
1037:, the original AfD's closing administrator, before opening the RfC here - specifically because I didn't want to take any actions that might be seen as inappropriate. Samwalton9 indicated to me that seeking further input on this issue wouldn't be out of line. If you have a problem with my desire to restore the article, then I wish you had spoken up during one of the prior discussions. I'm willing to hear whatever you have to say, but please, try to discuss things with me
220:
411:
90:
160:
80:
53:
22:
338:
317:
557:
1088:
closing administrator advised me to keep things more concise. I genuinely tried to keep my initial comment on this page short, but there was a lot of ground to cover - the first half was all about providing contextual background info and had almost nothing to do with my personal views. Would you rather that new participants in this discussion
727:, handled things properly based on the conversation that took place, I personally feel quite strongly that the article should have been kept. I've shared my reasons with Samwalton9 - and he/she's expressed openness towards having the article restored, so long as a consensus to that end can be achieved.
1101:
Again, I'll admit that I may be pressing this matter too hard. And if other editors agree with you that this RfC should be closed, then I'm willing to consider going that route. My intention isn't to force my views on anyone else. That said, I was hoping to have an engaged, respectful conversation
1087:
Look - I've probably made mistakes in how I've handled this issue. I won't deny that. Generally, I try to steer clear of policy disagreements on
Knowledge. So all of this has been somewhat unfamiliar ground for me. I recognize that brevity isn't one of my strong suits. And I'm aware that the DRV's
1063:
The closer at deletion review told you that you needed to be more succinct, and you respond by writing an arguement of epic proportions here. I tell you your wasting everyone's time with the repeated rehashing of the same information and you respond with another volume. Suggest you stop worrying
796:
was the top-watched show in the US for several years, and the quality of sourcing that exists for the show reflects that. If there's any objective way of determining when to create a standalone article for an individual "only notable for a single event", then I feel that it should be through the
741:
A few of the AfD's original participants have expressed reluctance or opposition towards having the article restored. Their reasoning appears to be largely based on the notion that
Brackensick is only notable for a single event. I've explained my own views on the matter in the two prior
1365:
512:
1102:
with other editors about policy matters. So far, I've offered detailed (if admittedly long-winded) explanations for my views and received very few rebuttals. Please don't misinterpret what I'm saying - I recognize that some editors have expressed opposition towards
1413:
1366:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120213025338/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/10/thursday-final-ratings-the-big-bang-theory-american-idol-greys-anatomy-the-mentalist-vampire-diaries-adjusted-up-rob-private-practice-the-finder-up-all-nig/119426/
753:
to prohibit standalone articles from being created about individuals who are only notable for a single event. If that were the case, then countless quality articles currently on
Knowledge would have to be deleted or redirected. Rather, the guideline
513:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120410223136/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com:80/2012/02/17/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-vampire-diaries-greys-anatomy-big-bang-theory-30-rock-office-adjusted-up-person-of-interest-mentalist-adjusted-down/120429/
1349:
1339:
742:
conversations. Anyone who is interested in reading all the details can go over there (or ask me for further clarification), but I've been told to keep things relatively brief here, so I'll try to distill my views into a couple of main points.
1369:
1391:
516:
1397:
1319:
522:
1169:. The new sources lack detail. Still ONEEVENT. Nothing of substance has changed in the few months since the AfD. Nothing at ALL has changed since the talk page discussion and the deletion review. This is a waste of editor's time.
1423:
502:
1414:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120227055432/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/24/thursday-final-ratings-big-bang-theory-american-idol-the-mentalist-adjusted-up-rob-private-practice-up-all-night-adjusted-down/121760/
765:
The guideline doesn't specifically state how the significance of an event or an individual's role therein should be determined, so I recognize that these factors may be somewhat subjective. I just realized however, that
492:
1417:
1350:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130328072516/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/09/wednesday-final-ratings-american-idol-suburgatory-adjusted-up-happy-endings-csi-svu-among-many-downward-adjustments/119343/
1340:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120205134135/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/03/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-big-bang-theory-greys-anatomy-office-mentalist-adjusted-up-rob-adjusted-down/118569/
1370:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/10/thursday-final-ratings-the-big-bang-theory-american-idol-greys-anatomy-the-mentalist-vampire-diaries-adjusted-up-rob-private-practice-the-finder-up-all-nig/119426/
776:
series contestants. Although I recognize that consensuses achieved on WikiProjects are not necessarily binding (and this particular WikiProject happens to be inactive), the guidelines at WP:IDOL state that
1392:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/17/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-vampire-diaries-greys-anatomy-big-bang-theory-30-rock-office-adjusted-up-person-of-interest-mentalist-adjusted-down/120429/
1375:
517:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/17/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-vampire-diaries-greys-anatomy-big-bang-theory-30-rock-office-adjusted-up-person-of-interest-mentalist-adjusted-down/120429/
1353:
848:
1398:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120227035612/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/23/wednesday-final-ratings-modern-family-csi-one-tree-hill-adjusted-up-the-middle-happy-endings-adjusted-down/121523/
996:
I'm trying to be respectful here...so I have to say that I'm taken aback by your tone. I recognize that I may be pressing this matter too hard, and if I've crossed a line, then I apologize - sincerely.
1343:
1320:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120205023555/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/02/wednesday-final-ratings-american-idol-adjusted-up-mobbed-super-bowls-greatest-commercials-adjusted-down/118437/
523:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120610234357/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com:80/2012/02/28/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-academy-awards-towers-over-the-week-big-bang-theory-is-top-scripted-show/122163/
1667:
634:
Should we discount certain coverage from denoting individual notability on
Brackensick, just because we feel that this coverage is directly tied to Brackensick's involvement with a single event?
1401:
1424:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120229221209/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/29/tuesday-final-ratings-american-idol-ncis-last-man-standing-body-of-proof-cougar-town-adjusted-up/122420/
1329:
1323:
846:
503:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120611054714/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com:80/2012/02/22/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-american-idol-the-voice-the-big-bang-theory-and-ncis-top-week-22/121141/
1064:
about getting this nobody's article into the encyclopedia and practice concision. I didn't respond because I don't have time to read all the crap you're writing. But I will respond to this.
1407:
526:
1427:
493:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120626063605/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com:80/2012/02/14/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-grammy-awards-the-voice-the-big-bang-theory-top-week-21/119740/
250:
1385:
1238:, were discovered after the AfD. I welcome any specific criticisms of these sources that you may have. My understanding though, is that all eleven of them should qualify as RS. --
506:
1418:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/24/thursday-final-ratings-big-bang-theory-american-idol-the-mentalist-adjusted-up-rob-private-practice-up-all-night-adjusted-down/121760/
1022:
950:
716:
1662:
850:(Although Brackensick isn't the primary focus of these sources, he's discussed in some amount of detail and in a context that is mostly separate from his association with
719:- but to summarize, the main reason given for Redirection / Deletion seems to have been that Brackensick had failed to receive coverage separate from his association with
293:
267:
1359:
496:
1376:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130515125648/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/16/wednesday-final-ratings-american-idol-whitney-adjust-up-the-middle-is-down/120174/
169:
63:
1354:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/09/wednesday-final-ratings-american-idol-suburgatory-adjusted-up-happy-endings-csi-svu-among-many-downward-adjustments/119343/
730:
Unfamiliar with the process of article restoration, I wasn't entirely sure how to best proceed. Two conversations about this matter have already taken place - one at
1344:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/03/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-big-bang-theory-greys-anatomy-office-mentalist-adjusted-up-rob-adjusted-down/118569/
1682:
388:
378:
1565:
1561:
1547:
1455:
1451:
1437:
299:
1379:
954:
735:
629:
1114:
to hear why people think that I'm misinterpreting policy, if for no other reason than so that I can understand going forward where I've gotten things wrong. --
1402:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/23/wednesday-final-ratings-modern-family-csi-one-tree-hill-adjusted-up-the-middle-happy-endings-adjusted-down/121523/
1687:
1672:
1632:
1330:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141120054920/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/07/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-super-bowl-the-voice-top-week-20/118854/
1324:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/02/wednesday-final-ratings-american-idol-adjusted-up-mobbed-super-bowls-greatest-commercials-adjusted-down/118437/
792:
and its contestants have always received a wealth of RS coverage. I could understand redirecting articles for contestants in some other reality shows, but
257:
150:
140:
1408:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/28/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-academy-awards-towers-over-the-week-big-bang-theory-is-top-scripted-show/122163/
527:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/28/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-academy-awards-towers-over-the-week-big-bang-theory-is-top-scripted-show/122163/
354:
808:, (and I don't feel that we should), he's also received significant coverage for his music career. Here are the sources that I've been able to find:
688:-- This is television, people who appear on television are not notable merely because they appear on television. This is an encyclopedia, after all.
1677:
1652:
1533:
1428:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/29/tuesday-final-ratings-american-idol-ncis-last-man-standing-body-of-proof-cougar-town-adjusted-up/122420/
262:
1333:
1657:
1642:
1029:
told me to take the matter to DRV, and the editors who participated in the discussion there, told me to take the matter here. I'm only doing what
174:
1386:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/22/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-american-idol-the-voice-the-big-bang-theory-and-ncis-top-week-22/121141/
507:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/22/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-american-idol-the-voice-the-big-bang-theory-and-ncis-top-week-22/121141/
1110:, people have been mostly silent. I'm willing to accept consensus, even if I don't receive the specifics that I'm looking for. But it would be
923:
424:
815:
112:
1627:
345:
322:
116:
233:
197:
1360:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/14/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-grammy-awards-the-voice-the-big-bang-theory-top-week-21/119740/
497:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/14/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-grammy-awards-the-voice-the-big-bang-theory-top-week-21/119740/
1647:
245:
1128:
Your actions do not match your words. You've shown a decided unwillingness to accept concensus. People have explained it all to you.
1543:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1433:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
760:
If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate
103:
58:
1637:
1380:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/16/wednesday-final-ratings-american-idol-whitney-adjust-up-the-middle-is-down/120174/
965:
if I've ever seen it. I'll be nice and give you the chance to withdraw it prior to seeking sanctions. You seriously need to
657:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
241:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1290:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
961:
that there is not enough to show notability, at the latter two with all the same sources you've listed here. This RfC is
738:. Ultimately, it was decided by those who were involved that opening an RfC here would be a preferable course of action.
723:. I wasn't a participant in the AfD, as I was unaware of it at the time. Although I feel that the closing administrator,
1608:
1498:
1223:
1204:
594:
33:
907:
867:
1276:
1174:
1137:
1069:
974:
453:
I have found articles stating that Hollie and Elise have both also signed onto deals and are producing an album --
1534:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120423180050/http://www.charlestonmag.com/charleston_magazine/feature/sound_control
1517:
1303:
613:
476:
1564:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1454:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1334:
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/07/tv-ratings-broadcast-top-25-super-bowl-the-voice-top-week-20/118854/
433:
1234:
1026:
958:
731:
1599:
1525:
1489:
1311:
585:
484:
1521:
1537:
1583:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1571:
1473:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1461:
1272:
1264:
1170:
1133:
1082:
1065:
991:
970:
829:
569:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
39:
1524:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1310:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
483:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
831:
693:
641:
612:
Consensus is that
Brackensick should not have a standalone article, and should be covered as part of
547:
225:
1198:.I would assume good faith and ask the initiator to point out the specific additions to the list of
21:
712:
667:
454:
353:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1191:
1107:
1106:. But when it comes to addressing specific points that I've raised, such as my interpretation of
746:
439:
1568:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1458:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1263:
some other editor, having reviewed your eleven sources "discovered after the AfD" finds (unlike
785:
s eleventh season, the "finalists" are considered to be the top 13 - Brackensick placed eighth.
209:
191:
1584:
1474:
570:
772:
625:
458:
95:
620:
has presented sources, but the consensus seems to be that they all derive from
Brackensick's
1271:
of them is a reliable source. Sorry I can't make time to review any of the sources myself.
1243:
1187:
1166:
1119:
1046:
935:
675:
435:
410:
1591:
1481:
577:
1038:
1034:
966:
724:
689:
637:
108:
1550:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1440:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1129:
962:
779:
finalists should qualify for their own article based on their participation in the show
767:
350:
1590:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1480:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1228:
Thanks for the polite response. All of the sources that I listed above, starting with
576:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1621:
238:
969:. Because you cannot seem to understand notability is not everyone else's problem.
159:
89:
1613:
1503:
1280:
1247:
1212:
1199:
1195:
1178:
1141:
1123:
1073:
1050:
978:
939:
921:
697:
679:
645:
599:
462:
437:
1557:
1447:
1239:
1115:
1042:
931:
671:
617:
111:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
770:
lays out clear criteria for determining when to create standalone articles for
1556:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1446:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
879:
215:
85:
893:
758:
for such articles under certain conditions. To quote WP:ONEEVENT directly: "
1202:
that happened after the last deletion discussion and the consequent review.
237:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
801:
finalist would likely qualify for their own article under that criteria.
107:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about
1538:
http://www.charlestonmag.com/charleston_magazine/feature/sound_control
564:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
79:
52:
1229:
337:
316:
833:(written by a professional blogger on staff with the newspaper)
440:
404:
15:
804:
Even if we were to discount
Brackensick's notability through
715:
and closed as a redirect. You can see the conversation here
532:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
158:
1528:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1314:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
878:
TVNZ1 (New
Zealand's primary state broadcasting network):
745:
First of all, it should be recognized that the purpose of
487:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
797:
coverage that he or she has received for that event. Any
1307:
480:
1668:
C-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
1092:
know of the two prior conversations that took place?
1025:; the editors who participated in the discussion at
349:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1560:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1450:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
717:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/DeAndre Brackensick
670:notable enough to receive a standalone article? --
298:This article has not yet received a rating on the
115:. To improve this article, please refer to the
1546:This message was posted before February 2018.
1436:This message was posted before February 2018.
1165:rebooting the separate article. Still fails
1041:, before resorting to threats of sanction. --
736:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2016 December 9
605:RfC on DeAndre Brackensick standalone article
8:
711:: In September 2015, an AfD was opened for
1516:I have just modified one external link on
1302:I have just modified 13 external links on
311:
186:
47:
1663:Unknown-importance United States articles
869:(Same situation as the two sources above)
475:I have just modified 4 external links on
313:
188:
49:
19:
1683:Mid-importance Jennifer Lopez articles
544:to let others know (documentation at
7:
653:The following discussion is closed.
363:Knowledge:WikiProject Jennifer Lopez
343:This article is within the scope of
231:This article is within the scope of
101:This article is within the scope of
1688:WikiProject Jennifer Lopez articles
366:Template:WikiProject Jennifer Lopez
278:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
38:It is of interest to the following
1673:WikiProject United States articles
1633:Mid-importance television articles
281:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1520:. Please take a moment to review
1306:. Please take a moment to review
904:Campbelltown MacArthur Advertiser
479:. Please take a moment to review
1286:The discussion above is closed.
1194:.We don't need sources but only
666:season 11 eighth place finalist
624:fame and that Brackensick fails
555:
409:
336:
315:
218:
208:
190:
125:Knowledge:WikiProject Television
88:
78:
51:
20:
1678:C-Class Jennifer Lopez articles
1653:WikiProject Television articles
1406:Corrected formatting/usage for
1390:Corrected formatting/usage for
1384:Corrected formatting/usage for
1358:Corrected formatting/usage for
383:This article has been rated as
145:This article has been rated as
128:Template:WikiProject Television
1658:C-Class United States articles
1643:High-importance Idols articles
1152:In favor of a separate article
843:The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
1:
1614:08:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
1248:14:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
1213:09:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
1179:03:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
1142:16:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
1124:05:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
1074:05:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
1051:02:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
979:01:43, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
940:18:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
788:It should also be noted that
680:18:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
357:and see a list of open tasks.
167:This article is supported by
1281:06:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
1259:having a separate article –
1130:You are simply not listening
1031:others have advised me to do
1017:That said, I was never even
698:16:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
646:03:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
600:10:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
1628:C-Class television articles
1033:. I even sought input from
1704:
1577:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1513:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1467:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1299:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
709:Comment from RfC initiator
472:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
389:project's importance scale
346:WikiProject Jennifer Lopez
300:project's importance scale
151:project's importance scale
1648:Idols task force articles
1518:American Idol (season 11)
1304:American Idol (season 11)
1157:Oppose a separate article
614:American Idol (season 11)
477:American Idol (season 11)
463:15:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
382:
331:
297:
234:WikiProject United States
203:
166:
144:
73:
46:
1504:18:08, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
1288:Please do not modify it.
1235:Honolulu Star-Advertiser
1027:Talk:DeAndre Brackensick
959:the redirect's talk page
918:Honolulu Star-Advertiser
732:Talk:DeAndre Brackensick
655:Please do not modify it.
239:United States of America
1509:External links modified
1295:External links modified
1224:Winged Blades of Godric
628:. As Jpcase put it in
468:External links modified
369:Jennifer Lopez articles
1638:C-Class Idols articles
284:United States articles
163:
104:WikiProject Television
28:This article is rated
1265:User:John from Idegon
1104:restoring the article
781:". In the context of
636:The answer is yes. --
162:
119:for the type of work.
1558:regular verification
1448:regular verification
1232:and ending with the
949:You've been told at
864:Metro Silicon Valley
226:United States portal
170:the Idols task force
1548:After February 2018
1438:After February 2018
713:DeAndre Brackensick
668:DeAndre Brackensick
632:, the question is:
536:parameter below to
252:Articles Requested!
131:television articles
113:join the discussion
109:television programs
1602:InternetArchiveBot
1553:InternetArchiveBot
1492:InternetArchiveBot
1443:InternetArchiveBot
656:
588:InternetArchiveBot
164:
34:content assessment
1578:
1468:
1200:reliable sources
1196:reliable sources
734:and the other at
654:
446:
445:
403:
402:
399:
398:
395:
394:
310:
309:
306:
305:
185:
184:
181:
180:
96:Television portal
1695:
1612:
1603:
1576:
1575:
1554:
1502:
1493:
1466:
1465:
1444:
1227:
1211:
1209:
1171:John from Idegon
1134:John from Idegon
1086:
1083:John from Idegon
1066:John from Idegon
995:
992:John from Idegon
971:John from Idegon
598:
589:
562:
559:
558:
551:
441:
413:
405:
371:
370:
367:
364:
361:
340:
333:
332:
327:
319:
312:
286:
285:
282:
279:
276:
228:
223:
222:
221:
212:
205:
204:
194:
187:
133:
132:
129:
126:
123:
117:style guidelines
98:
93:
92:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1703:
1702:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1618:
1617:
1606:
1601:
1569:
1562:have permission
1552:
1526:this simple FaQ
1511:
1496:
1491:
1459:
1452:have permission
1442:
1312:this simple FaQ
1297:
1292:
1291:
1221:
1205:
1203:
1159:
1154:
1080:
989:
706:
659:
650:
649:
648:
607:
592:
587:
560:
556:
545:
485:this simple FaQ
470:
451:
442:
436:
418:
368:
365:
362:
359:
358:
325:
283:
280:
277:
274:
273:
272:
258:Become a Member
224:
219:
217:
175:High-importance
130:
127:
124:
121:
120:
94:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1701:
1699:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1620:
1619:
1596:
1595:
1588:
1541:
1540:
1532:Added archive
1510:
1507:
1486:
1485:
1478:
1431:
1430:
1422:Added archive
1420:
1412:Added archive
1410:
1404:
1396:Added archive
1394:
1388:
1382:
1374:Added archive
1372:
1364:Added archive
1362:
1356:
1348:Added archive
1346:
1338:Added archive
1336:
1328:Added archive
1326:
1318:Added archive
1296:
1293:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1216:
1215:
1184:Strong Oppose
1181:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
982:
981:
967:drop the stick
928:
927:
926:
925:
912:
911:
910:
909:
898:
897:
896:
895:
884:
883:
882:
881:
873:
872:
871:
870:
858:
857:
856:
855:
837:
836:
835:
834:
820:
819:
818:
817:
783:American Idol'
705:
702:
701:
700:
660:
651:
611:
610:
609:
608:
606:
603:
582:
581:
574:
530:
529:
521:Added archive
519:
511:Added archive
509:
501:Added archive
499:
491:Added archive
469:
466:
450:
447:
444:
443:
438:
434:
432:
429:
428:
420:
419:
414:
408:
401:
400:
397:
396:
393:
392:
385:Mid-importance
381:
375:
374:
372:
360:Jennifer Lopez
355:the discussion
351:Jennifer Lopez
341:
329:
328:
326:Mid‑importance
323:Jennifer Lopez
320:
308:
307:
304:
303:
296:
290:
289:
287:
271:
270:
265:
260:
255:
248:
246:Template Usage
242:
230:
229:
213:
201:
200:
195:
183:
182:
179:
178:
165:
155:
154:
147:Mid-importance
143:
137:
136:
134:
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1700:
1689:
1686:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1625:
1623:
1616:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1604:
1593:
1589:
1586:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1573:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1514:
1508:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1494:
1483:
1479:
1476:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1463:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1409:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1393:
1389:
1387:
1383:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1361:
1357:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1300:
1294:
1289:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1236:
1231:
1225:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1210:
1208:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1091:
1084:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
993:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
937:
933:
924:
922:
919:
916:
915:
914:
913:
908:
905:
902:
901:
900:
899:
894:
891:
888:
887:
886:
885:
880:
877:
876:
875:
874:
868:
865:
862:
861:
860:
859:
853:
849:
847:
844:
841:
840:
839:
838:
832:
830:
827:
826:York Dispatch
824:
823:
822:
821:
816:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
807:
802:
800:
799:American Idol
795:
794:American Idol
791:
790:American Idol
786:
784:
780:
775:
774:
769:
763:
761:
757:
752:
748:
743:
739:
737:
733:
728:
726:
722:
721:American Idol
718:
714:
710:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
664:American Idol
658:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
622:American Idol
619:
615:
604:
602:
601:
596:
591:
590:
579:
575:
572:
568:
567:
566:
565:
553:
549:
543:
539:
535:
528:
524:
520:
518:
514:
510:
508:
504:
500:
498:
494:
490:
489:
488:
486:
482:
478:
473:
467:
465:
464:
460:
456:
448:
431:
430:
427:
426:
422:
421:
417:
412:
407:
406:
390:
386:
380:
377:
376:
373:
356:
352:
348:
347:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
324:
321:
318:
314:
301:
295:
292:
291:
288:
275:United States
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
253:
249:
247:
244:
243:
240:
236:
235:
227:
216:
214:
211:
207:
206:
202:
199:
198:United States
196:
193:
189:
176:
173:(assessed as
172:
171:
161:
157:
156:
152:
148:
142:
139:
138:
135:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
91:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1600:
1597:
1572:source check
1551:
1545:
1542:
1515:
1512:
1490:
1487:
1462:source check
1441:
1435:
1432:
1301:
1298:
1287:
1268:
1267:) that even
1260:
1256:
1233:
1206:
1183:
1162:
1111:
1103:
1089:
1030:
1018:
929:
917:
903:
889:
863:
851:
842:
825:
805:
803:
798:
793:
789:
787:
782:
778:
771:
764:
759:
755:
750:
744:
740:
729:
720:
708:
707:
685:
663:
661:
652:
633:
621:
586:
583:
563:
554:
541:
537:
533:
531:
474:
471:
452:
423:
415:
384:
344:
263:Project Talk
251:
232:
168:
146:
102:
40:WikiProjects
1192:WP:ONEEVENT
1108:WP:ONEEVENT
747:WP:ONEEVENT
548:Sourcecheck
449:Record Deal
1622:Categories
1609:Report bug
1499:Report bug
1190:.Perfect.
1035:Samwalton9
725:Samwalton9
704:Discussion
690:Damotclese
638:Cerebellum
626:WP:ONEVENT
595:Report bug
122:Television
59:Television
1592:this tool
1585:this tool
1482:this tool
1475:this tool
1188:WP:NMUSIC
578:this tool
571:this tool
1598:Cheers.—
1488:Cheers.—
1186:- Fails
1019:involved
814:Yahoo!:
584:Cheers.—
416:Archives
1522:my edit
1308:my edit
1039:civilly
1021:in the
963:WP:TEND
957:and at
890:MidWeek
768:WP:IDOL
630:the DRV
534:checked
481:my edit
455:BuoyDog
387:on the
149:on the
30:C-class
1261:unless
1257:Oppose
1240:Jpcase
1230:Yahoo!
1167:NMUSIC
1163:Oppose
1116:Jpcase
1043:Jpcase
932:Jpcase
756:allows
672:Jpcase
618:Jpcase
542:failed
268:Alerts
36:scale.
1207:Light
64:Idols
1277:talk
1273:yoyo
1244:talk
1175:talk
1138:talk
1120:talk
1112:nice
1070:talk
1047:talk
975:talk
936:talk
852:Idol
806:Idol
773:Idol
694:talk
676:talk
642:talk
538:true
459:talk
1566:RfC
1536:to
1456:RfC
1426:to
1416:to
1400:to
1378:to
1368:to
1352:to
1342:to
1332:to
1322:to
1269:one
1090:not
1023:AfD
955:DRV
951:AfD
762:".
751:not
749:is
662:Is
616:.
552:).
540:or
525:to
515:to
505:to
495:to
379:Mid
294:???
141:Mid
1624::
1579:.
1574:}}
1570:{{
1469:.
1464:}}
1460:{{
1279:)
1246:)
1177:)
1140:)
1132:.
1122:)
1072:)
1049:)
977:)
953:,
938:)
930:--
920::
906::
892::
866::
845::
828::
696:)
686:No
678:)
644:)
550:}}
546:{{
461:)
177:).
62::
1611:)
1607:(
1594:.
1587:.
1501:)
1497:(
1484:.
1477:.
1275:(
1242:(
1226::
1222:@
1173:(
1136:(
1118:(
1085::
1081:@
1068:(
1045:(
994::
990:@
973:(
934:(
854:)
777:"
692:(
674:(
640:(
597:)
593:(
580:.
573:.
561:Y
457:(
425:1
391:.
302:.
153:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
