Talk:Amitabh Bachchan/Archive 1

2695:

1975 – Flop 11 Mili 1975 – B 12 Sholay 1975 30,00,00,000 A111* 13 Faraar 1975 – Flop 14 Chupke Chupke 1975 – AA 15 Hera Pheri 1976 5,00,00,000 A1* 16 Kabhi Kabhi 1976 – AA 17 Adalat 1976 – AA* 18 Do Anjaane 1976 – A 19 Amar Akbar Abthony 1977 9,00,00,000 AAA* 20 Khoon Pasina 1977 5,00,00,000 A1* 21 Alaap 1977 – Flop 22 Parvarish 1977 6,50,00,000 A11* 23 Imaan Dharam 1977 – Flop 24 Ganga Ki Saugandh 1978 – AA* 25 Kasme Vaade 1978 5,00,00,000 A1* 26 Besharam 1978 – BB 27 Trishul 1978 7,00,00,000 A11* 28 Don 1978 6,00,00,000 A1* 29 Muqaddar Ka Sikander 1978 10,00,00,000 AAA* 30 The Great Gambler 1979 – B 31 Jurmana 1979 – Flop 32 Mr Natwarlal 1979 7,00,00,000 A1* 33 Kala Pathar 1979 – BB 34 Manzil 1979 – B 35 Suhaag 1979 7,00,00,000 A1* 36 Do Aur Do Paanch 1980 – A 37 Dostana 1980 7,00,00,000 A1* 38 Ram Balraam 1980 7,00,00,000 AA* 39 Shaan 1980 7,00,00,000 A* 40 Naseeb 1981 10,00,00,000 A1* 41 Barsaat Ki Ek Raat 1981 – AA* 42 Lawaaris 1981 9,00,00,000 A11* 43 Silsila 1981 – Flop 44 Yaraana 1981 7,00,00,000 A1* 45 Kaalia 1981 – AA* 46 Satte Pe Satta 1982 – AA* 47 Bemisaal 1982 – B 48 Desh Premee 1982 – A 49 Namak Halaal 1982 8,00,00,000 A11* 50 Khudaar 1982 7,00,00,000 A1* 51 Shakti 1982 – B 52 Nastik 1983 BB 53 Andha Kanoon 1983 9,00,00,000 A11* 54 Mahaan 1983 – B 55 Pukar 1983 – B 56 Coolie 1983 11,00,00,000 A11* 57 Inquilaab 1984 – B 58 Sharaabi 1984 6,00,00,000 AA* 59 Geraftaar 1985 – AA* 60 Mard 1985 8,00,00,000 A1* 61 Aakhree Raasta 1986 7,50,00,000 A1* 62 Shahenshah 1988 7,00,00,000 AA* 63 Ganga Jamuna Saraswati 1988 – B Classifications A111-All Time Blockbuster AAA-Blockbuster A11-Super Hit A1-Super Hit/Hit AA-Hit A-Semi Hit BB-Above Average B-Average

867:"descriptions" of my edits, I haven't yet finished, which is largely why it looks like one big mess. I'm going to finish to-night, and the entire entry, I hope, is much more concise, readable, and (as you put it) "encyclopædic." I think it's unfair how Indian actors and actresses have horribly scanty pages (though I can't say that Bachchan's was really "scanty"), whereas Hollywood stars have paragraph after paragraph dedicated to them. I understand that this site is an "encyclopædia," and not a biographical resource, but encyclopædias, when they discuss people, are indeed biographical. Just take a look at Knowledge's pages on Al Pacino: it talks about the films he did at the start of his career, those that made him a star (it even has a quotation from "Scarface," cited as one of his famous lines), his "comeback films," etc. It also talks about his early, non-movie life. Brando's page is similar, but even longer, and more detailed. Opinions regarding talent are scattered throughout both these actors' Knowledge articles. There religious backgrounds, too, are mentioned. Sylvestor Stallone is discussed in detail on his page. I think Bachchan's page needs a good deal of revising, and that's what I was trying to do. Let me finish, then calmly look at the new page. See what you think, and let's let a few others do the same. If people feel it works, great. If it stinks, of course, it'll be changed. Thanks. 155:

times is bachan sahab referred to as super and megastar and at places even a new term is coined, mega-superstar. WOW. If people here really knew the strict meaning of the terms 'superstar' and 'megastar', they would realise bachan sahab is miles away from super and megastardom. Do these indians even know indian celebrities are aliens outside the indian community. I once wrote on a coversation channel where ppl chatting were mainly from UK and japan. I wrote there 'anyone knows who'z amitabh bachan sahab?'. The reply wasnt 'No', the reply was 'What' It's like what is it? what's that name? is it some extinct animal creature? I have been writing in the introduction section of this article that bachan is one of the top paid stars of indian films but that is a very small amount against hollywood standards, which is a solid fact. But some indians, they just round the clock remove the hollywood part. Why? I'm just writing the fact. Nothing harsh. But these indians as i mentioned earlier, have this huge mind issue, favoritism issue. Do u even know wot the top hollywood stars (the super and mega stars in the true sense) earn? they earn in cases, 100 times then wot mr. bachan makes! enuff said

159:--- Re: To above --- Earnings don't make for a valid comparison. Can you name any Hollywood *star* who holds sway over a population as Mr. Bachchan does? Sorry to burst your Hollywood bubble, but your/other's ignorance is simply not a valid excuse for your edit. One could argue that your anti-Indian bias makes for your extremely pathetic attempts to downplay Bombay cinema's influence vs Hollywood's. Remember, Bombay Cinema and Hollywood are very different universes with very different origins/societal influences/whatever (list here). Unless such differences are clearly noted a comparison is simply not valid. 1021:"stability"; this is a Web site that is founded on plasticity, not concreteness. If you disagree with what someone has done, explain on the discussion page your reasons. Don't start chopping out major parts of an article simply because you "don't like it," or think it's "unnecessary." I realize that Knowledge suggests that articles be of a certain "maximum length," but, in reality, "big topics" and "big people" almost always (greatly) exceed this suggestion. Amitabh Bachchan — in particular, then — is not one of the people whose page we ought to try to keep "nice and short." ...Thank you for your time. 1305:

indeed, from the United States (of course, I could be wrong about this). Certainly, if someone wants to do the leg-work, scholarly research might be able to strengthen this article. Nonetheless, even tapping into our "common" knowledge of Bachchan, I believe we can churn out a better, fuller, more interesting article than that which we currently have. I've decided to make some minor (I don't care to make major ones, only to have them inevitably wiped out by various users) alterations here and there, and I hope they spruce up this entry at least somewhat. Let's see what happens...

1578:, in which Amitabh is not even named. As near as I can figure out, at the time the scandal emerged, one newspaper (not named -- the Hindu?) accused Amitabh of being involved in the scandal, apparently on the basis that he was a friend of Rajiv Gandhi and was therefore guilty. I found one Amitabh interview in which he claimed that he refuted all the accusations and forced the newspaper (unnamed) to print an apology. But I can't find any details. That is why the older version of the article was so vague. 31: 829:

Srivastav" of "Ajitabh Bachchan" (or something else), but everyone in Amitabh's immediate family (wife, Jaya; daughter, Shweta; and son, Abhishesk) writes "Bachchan" as his or her last name. I'm not sure as to the answer behind this mystery, but this seems simply to be the case. Perhaps Amitabh's last name, at birth, was, indeed, "Srivastav," but, at this point, for all intents and purposes, his "family name" appears to be "Bachchan."

416:

I reverted to an earlier version that I know is non-copy-vio, and I've left a message for the anon inviting him to take a username and come here to discuss his changes. I could be completely wrong, and that could be his own, original essay. We'll be able to tell if and when he discusses the changes; if the writing style is the same, then I'll just have to say, "Welcome new and articulate editor! Please do more!"

2381:

For example, they find it difficult to carry on repeatative movements, or the patient may be unable to comb his hair beyond a certain time. Myasthenia is usually not known to be caused by the reasons cited. A drug called penicillamine (not to be confused with the antibiotic penicillin) can cause a similar problem, but it is not something one would have as "heavy medication" as cited. Some other drugs

2887: 1093:

critical views of Amitabh, with quotes from reputable reviewers re his performances in various movies, so that readers could decide which films the critics liked. Anything other than measurable box office receipts or quotes from published reviews is personal opinion. Suppose I like different Amitabh films than Pratulka does? Who gets to pick which are Amitabh's best or "notable" films?

2729:

starred and been successfull in uncountable number of movies, though most have been in character role capacity thus cant be counted(in this context that is), though he has again had Pivotal roles in movies like Paa,Black,Cheeni Kum and Khakee but such movies wont be 10% of his movies since 2000 and definitely dont echo back at the glorious run of 1973-88. LINKS follows

853:

which, if they're yours, constitute original research. It's OK to quote judgements by critics, if they can be documented, but just speculating about Amitabh being to Khanna what Brando was to Cary Grant is just ... not encyclopedic. The whole bit re the Walter Reade program reads like copyvio and is just too much for one small event. This is, IMHO, a disaster.

905:"altered" by "everyone," but some of the changes are insane; it just becomes a back-and-forth game after a while. Hell, even a few of your changes are weak and biased. Anyway, it doesn't matter to me very much. I've decided to just create my own damn site, if it's so important to me that what I have to say be said fully and finally. Thanks. 2890:. The article starts with "The All India Sikh Students Federation (AISSF) claims to have produced a documentary “November 1984– a state sponsored Sikh massacre” charging Bollywood star Amitabh Bachchan with inciting people to kill Sikhs after the assassination of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi". And the article ends with, 1645:: If the myesthenia gravis is a fact, then it should be referenced. As for the style -- if I were to submit that article to the copyeditors on the CEL mailing list, they would tear it to shreds. It's not a matter of disliking a certain style -- there are many prose styles that I do not like but must admit are competent. ( 2240:, while in character, mocked the media coverage of the alleged fight between Khan and Bachchan and declared the former as the winner because "he dances". However, Colbert changed his decision on Jan 19 and declared Bachchan victorious after witnessing Bachchan's dancing skills in the song "Say Shava Shava" from 1623:

therein. Whether the article is "perfect" or isn't (for the record, I don't think it ever can be something so subjective as "perfect"), I think it's decently-written, and not in need of the type of contempt you seem to be showing for it. I'm not saying people "shouldn't" try to improve what they feel

1353:

revert, and find that someone undoes your action, understand that it's probably not some stupid act of vandalism to begin with; the person likely genuinely wishes the changes to be made. Knowledge is built on change and alteration; it can't (and shouldn't) stay the same forever, so please don't fight

1304:

I agree that, perhaps, the article could use a few references more "book" and less "entertainment magazine." It's not that there's not a good deal of "academic" writing concerning Bachchan, it's just that it's obviously not very popular in America, and I think most English-Knowledge contributors are,

852:

Commando, I've been busy in real life (RL) and didn't see what you were doing until now. I don't like it! You are replacing a tight, readable article with something that reads very much like copyvio. The paragraphs are so long as to be almost unreadable. The prose is just full of personal judgements,

312:

Ah, I see. I've had a go-round on this with editor Merovingian. He set to work on the Madhuri Dixit article, trying to make it sound more scholarly. He and I tussled over it a bit, then, after Merovingian had finished toning it down, a few Madhuri fans arrived and gushed it up again. Way more than it

154:

I dont know why do a majority of indians have this very pathetic habit of giving huge undue credits to celebrities of their nations. They are just deaf and blind to the reality and have their own superficial stupid thinking patterns which they wont change whatever happens. I cant even count how many

1618:

The myesthenia gravis is more or less known fact. Just type in the illness and "Amitabh Bachchan" on a search engine, and look through the results. The Bofors Scandal is something commonly brought up when discussing Amitabh Bachchan; it is an important aspect of his political career, and thus one of

1437:

sources we have of what goes on in Bollywood. Interviews can be cited whereas gossip columns cannot. You yourself brought up the point about how Bollywood news is little discussed in newspapers/books. In this particular case, the May 1990 issue of Stardust is an interview with Amitabh and thus it is

1348:

If someone edits the article, please see why he or she might have done so. If it doesn't make the article oddly worse, and isn't obvious vandalism, please refrain from waving the magic wand and reverting someone else's work. If something seems particularly glaring, try to adjust it (not just replace

1074:

I rewrote and tightened up the argument. I removed the long opening statement, but did replace it with a para that emphasized the length of Amitabh's career and the many years of his popularity. I removed a fair number of personal opinions, repeated items, and some trivia items that were part of the

415:

An anon just put a whole lot of material into the "early career" section -- analyzing Amitabh's rivalry with Rajesh Khanna, discussing various early films, etc. It reads to me like a copyvio, a chunk of material from someone else's book or essay. However, I haven't been able to find a source online.

2728:

1 Toofan 1989 – B 2 Jaadugar 1989 – Flop 3 Main Azaad Hoon 1989 – Flop 4 Agneepath 1990 – B 5 Aaj Ka Arjun 1990 7,00,00,000 AA* 6 Hum 1991 8,00,00,000 AA* 7 Ajooba 1991 – Flop 8 Indrajeet 1991 – Flop 9 Akayla 1991 – Flop 10 Khuda Gawah 1992 – B 11 Insaaniyat 1994 – B Since 1997 Amitabh Bachchan has

2694:

Film Year Gross(where available) Classification 1 Zanjeer 1973 5,00,00,000 AAA* 2 Bandhe Haath 1973 – Flop 3 Abhimaaan 1973 – A 4 Namak Haraam 1973 – BB 5 Kasauti 1974 – B 6 Benaam 1974 – B 7 Majboor 1974 – AA* 8 Roti Kapada Aur Makaan 1974 12,50,00,000 AAA* 9 Deewar 1975 6,50,00,000 A11* 10 Zameer

2380:

Myasthenia gravis is a disorder where there is a problem at the junction of the nerve and muscle. Certain types of proteins at such places block the uptake of important chemicals causing the muscle to tire easily. People with myasthenia find it difficult to do things which cause the muscle to tire.

1663:

article, and, while that does not exempt it from being "well-written," I feel it does make a compelling case to be more lenient in expectations. Articles will be cohesive and flowing when authored by one or two people, and set as a "final" version. With Knowledge, entries are constantly changed and

1451:

In which case take direct quotes from the interview and cite those, avoiding speculation from the interviewer. The whole point about BLP is to avoid libel and speculation. Similarly very personal events such as an affair should only be included if it has a very valid reason for inclusion, otherwise

1057:

That "source" for Bachchan's wearing a wig is hardly "reliable"; many of the "facts" stated on it are questionable, and the mere format and language ("Hema malini was about to get married to Jitendra when darmendra went and got her lover back et la Krishna in mahabaratha") indicate that the site is

597:

if either of you could make specific note of what doesn't work, i'm sure we (or I, since both of you seem indisposoded to the idea) could fix it. it comes down to the old way being a story, whereas i'm looking for an encyclopedia article. the old scheme pales in comparison to other "good" wikipedia

571:

besides which, your argument is a bit odd, especially since his early life and family life are pretty much just his "life". the chronological argument doesnt really work either, since his career and public life intertwine in the timeline, and his family life isnt really a different subject from his

440:

I hated to do it, since you had clearly worked hard on the article, but we have to try to keep up a certain standard of quality. However -- there are many many Bollywood movies, actors, producers, etc. who don't have any articles at all. If you're just starting a needed article, it's less important

1546:

Many people, including lots of anons, have been working on this article of late and it has turned into a mess. The article is now full of un-encyclopedic film magazine language, tortured English, and unreferenced gossip. I haven't looked at it in detail, but I suspect that various chunks now break

1465:

Yes, my point exactly, thank you. The incident (affair) was notable because it was rather a big scandal at the time (possibly warranting a new 'Controversies' section), in which Amitabh was prepared to leave his wife and family for Rekha, and did not do so because he was highly impressed/guilty at

1260:

more information on their pages, while Bachchan's is restricted to a few details and a whole big "filmography." I'm not saying this to try to "compete," but to try to put things in perspective. Yes, Knowledge is not a "fan Web page," and, as such, ought not to be filled with gushing claims, career

839:

The case is simmilar with late mr Kishore Kumar, real name Abbhas Ganguly, but he was known as Kishore Kumar, and rest of his family is also known as Kumar instead of Ganguly. I dont know if both Bachchcan's name are registered as Bachchan in official registrars or not. I also beleive that Ajitabh

820:

Shouldn't his real name be mentioned in the article? As far as I know late mr Harivanshrai Bachchan's real surname was Srivastava. Bachchan was an "artist name" he used when he published his writings. I guess this imlies that Amitabh Bachchan's real surname is also Srivastava, and that Bachchan is

639:

Twice now anonIPs have attempted to insert material re Amitabh's recent bout of colitis and hospital stay. I'm not sure that this article is the place for breaking news. The news bulletins I'm reading say that he's doing well. IMHO, his hospital stay would be news only if he didn't recover (avert!

546:

I've lost track of who reorganized the article, but it doesn't work. Separating Amitabh's biography from his career is just not feasible. The new biography section reads like a random assemblage of snippets, which is what it is. Please, let's go back to the old organization, in which we have early

430:

An anon made a great many changes, none of which, I felt, were for the better. I reverted, but with some sadness, because someone had worked hard. Here's the message I left on the anon's talk page. I don't know if he/she will see it there, if he/she is using an ISP and doesn't have a static IP, so

318:

I don't necessarily disagree that the writing could be drier. It's just that when most writing about Indian movies is somewhat florid, it's hard for any writer to take a dry tone. Especially when dealing with fans (fanatics!) who believe that their idol is something approaching a divine avatar. So

257:

My edit description got truncated by an accidental fingerstroke. Um, I removed the list of films in which Abhishek appears. His filmography really has no place on his father's page. Those interested in Abhishek can go to HIS page. Really, the list of films was starting to overwhelm that section of

2894:

So, Mr. Mann, where does the case stand? Please refrain from (re-)introducing highly POV materials to Knowledge. In case, you do not relent, my earlier statement, left in your talk page still stands. Oh, by the way, as you have tried to project, I am not a guy who would say that in 1984 the Sikhs

1587:

The article as it stands seems to imply that he WAS implicated in the scandal, charged, and later exonerated. Which could be actionable, you must admit. If that bit is going to be in the article, it should be linked to the Bofors scandal. It should also be made clear that accusations were made in

1265:

headline-news material. At the moment, there's not even a section dedicated to telling of his long-reaching status and image in the Indian film industry, let alone much about how his career has unfolded and evolved. Again, I don't mean to advocate pages and pages singing the praises of the "angry

924:

I should perhaps add that I might be prejudiced against Govinda. I made an effort to watch one of his movies and gave up. Of course, a lot of movies that Indians find hilarious I just find off-putting. The only Indian comedy I've seen that had me convulsed with laughter was Raghu Romeo -- which I

582:

I would go along with Zora; I am however sympathetic to where you are coming from Yoasif. I think the 'life, career, public life, family life' thread IS workable (look elsewhere) - we just need to sieve the material to fit. Go ahead Zora - and then we can discuss as she/we go along. But wholesale

1330:

In other words, try to consider the person on the other end of the discussion to be a thinking, rational being who is trying to positively contribute to Knowledge. Even if you're convinced that they're Evil reptilian kitten eaters from another planet, still pretend they're acting in good faith.

1273:

Also, the style of writing on the page is all over the place. I feel this is inevitable, as Knowledge is a site created and maintained by the efforts of the "many," and when a lot of people play around with one thing, some "unevenness" is bound to occur. Nonetheless, I think things could be put

729:

Are we satisfied that widespread hearsay is okay to back up the following: 'commonly held belief that influential public figures such as Sahara Group chairman Subroto Roy and politician Amar Singh helped bail Bachchan financially out of his debts, the actor also took on visibly more acting and

2300:

This page has almost become a fan page which list only good things about Bachchan. In addition to Rekha, the above section has been removed, any idea why ? I wish people editing showed some sense that this is not a fan pace, Bachchan's CV has to have that part as the whole world knows he had a

1634:

The WP article on the Bofors scandal is not even properly written, just a stub, so whether it mentions Bachchan or not is irrelevant. However, I have some concerns about the site linked to: Wouldn't it be better to look for the original FT article rather than rely on a doubtful-looking site? I

1401:

in that he was prepared to leave his wife and family over it before he had his accident (see May 1990 issue of Stardust for example). This information ought to be re-included because it is most certainly a hallmark of his life, even as his participation in 'Silsila' was an on-screen playout of

1369:

I think it's generally accepted that AB and Rekha did have an affair, but I don't see any need for the article to mention it. Both people are still alive, the sources would all be gossip magazines and "everyone knows," and any affair, if it happened, is not of much relevance to their lives and

1240:

Shouldn't the main image not be one from a film role, but from an "appearance as himself" of some sort? It's currently a shot of Bachchan as "Sexy Sam" (from "Kabhi Alvia Naa Kehna"), which seems extraordinarily inappopriate, as it shows him wearing what looks to be fur (Amitabh is a member of

1092:

I removed the notable films again, because picking out SOME films as notable is personal opinion. Pratulka could do some research on box office receipts, and add that to the filmography. Then it would be clear which movies were hits and which didn't do well. Pratulka could also write a para on

828:

Although "Bachchan," I believe, was Harivansh Rai Bachchan's "pen name," it is now most likely the "surname" of the family. A typical pen name will be written only by the artist, and not adpoted by the members of his family. I'm not sure whether Amitabh's long-estranged brother writes "Ajitabh

866:

Zora, if others (not just you) are unhappy with the changes I'm making, I'll have no problem stopping; this isn't my Web site, so it doesn't really matter to me what's written here. I've been updating the page in the hopes of making it more informative, and that's all. As I've indicated in my

771:

Amitabh is a great actor and one of my favorites. He is definitely a legend. Having said that, should this BBC Poll "Star of the Millenium" be emphasized and included in the first paragraph? I dont think it was a serious poll at all. Homer Simpson was voted in at #5 and Govinda made # 10.

904:

Right, I don't care. I find Knowledge's restrictions regarding information rigid and inconsistent: Whereas certain Hollywood actors can have line after adulatory line, of biased, "personal-life" detail, an Indian actor simply cannot have that. Further, I realize that Knowledge is meant to be

471:

The para re Amitabh's recent film activities said that he had appeared in a number hit films, notably ... and then listed films. Other editors just could not leave this list alone, and insisted on adding every film in which he has recently appeared, turning the sentence into a repeat of the

400:

Someone added a couple of sentences saying that Amitabh had had an affair with the actress Rekha. I removed them. So far as I can tell, they don't explain anything important about the Bollywood movie scene (unlike, say, the Nargis-Raj Kapoor liason) and they reek of gossip-column voyeurism.

435:

Anon, I'm sorry, but I had to revert your work on the Amitabh article. You don't seem to be a native English speaker and many of your edits replaced grammatical prose with mangled English and whimsical capitalization. No new material was added, so far as I could see, other than praise of

1212:(it seems a copy of a previous version). Can anyone provide legit sources, newspapers? Naming the newspapers concerned and any litigation. This is not libel and explains his leaving politics. I cant find anything from google, hence Im asking. I made the edit but was auto logged out. 1169:

And the funny thing is that all the information is totally disorganised. The Biography section contains facts about his later life which should be put in the "current" section, and so on. The Bio section is essentially an extension of the Lead. OOh, I smell another cleanup! :)

920:

I rewrote so that Shakirfan's fave movie appeared, but in a place where it didn't turn the paragraph as a whole into nonsense. However, I do wonder if the Govinda film was in any way a hit of the stature of Mohabbatein. Does anyone know where we can get box office stats now?

1466:

the love shown by his wife during his illness. The interview is also a fantastic source for quotes about the illness itself, and is connected incontrovertibly with the affair scandal. So yes, there are valid reasons for inclusion and references for them can be cited I agree.

1379:

I don't know about generally "accepted"; "speculated," maybe (it's not as though either part ever came forth and said, "yeah, we did it"). Anyway, I agree that it's not something that really belongs anywhere in the article, especially as an item under "Family." If anything,

593:

i'd rather deal with the diehards than to accept a worse/less logical organizational scheme and slowly make the same changes i would have made. the edits aren't just organizational, a lot of small cleanup was done too, and you'd lose all of that if it was simply reverted.

730:

endorsing contracts to pay off his creditors. According to most accounts, with his return the small screen for a second season of Kaun Banega Crorepati, his debts may have been completely cleared in 2005. Some observers speculate that he will try to revive his company'.

987:

I am one of the biggest fan of Big B, living on this planet, Earth. Whatever, I posted regarding "Versus" is based upon reality and myth. Remember one thing, there is always "versus" inbetween ceebrities and all other showbiz personalities, may be you are unaware of.

1096:

As for the prose in the first para -- Pratulka's prose is convoluted and stuffy. I'm not saying that my prose is always perfect. There are some WP editors who can give my prose the once-over and improve it significantly. I just don't think Pratulka is one of them.

1418:

Stardust magazine is not a reliable source. Film magazines will say *anything* to hook readers. If there's a well-researched bio of Amitabh published by a reputable press, with quotes from people who actually knew Amitabh and Rekha, then that might be OK to cite.

1344:(like "LALALALAL*&*@@THIS_SUX0RZsammygoo", or someone changing "4+5=9" to "4+5=30"). If you really can't stand something, revert once, with an edit summary something like "(rv) I disagree strongly, I'll explain why in talk." and immediately take it to talk." 1502:"He lost his hair when he was young, so when he started his movie career he wore wig. He has tried not to appear in photos without his wig. If you look at his picture from "Zanjeer" that is his early years wig and then he changed the colour as he got older." 2717:

1 Saat Hindustani 1969 – Flop 2 Anand 1970 – AA 3 Reshma Aur Shera 1971 – Flop 4 Pyar Ki Kahani 1971 – Flop 5 Parwana 1971 – Flop 6 Bombay To Goa 1971 – BB 7 Bansi Birju 1972 – Flop 8 Ek Nazar 1972 – Flop 9 Sanjog 1972 – Flop 10 Raaste Ka Pathar 1972 – Flop

241:

I thought that the article as it stood had too much fawning praise and too few facts, so I rewrote it extensively. I have never been a major Amitabh fan, so I may have missed some crucial points. I hope that my co-editors will fill in where I've faltered.

2673:

There might be an never-ending debate on how perhaps the Movie business has changed in the last 30 odd years. Actors are doing increasingly lesser movies(though this trend started in the 2000′s only),increase in other mediums of entertainment, and so on.

1100:

If Pratulka wants to get a mediator to rule on prose style, we can try that. But he can't just forbid me to edit this article on the grounds that I'm a vandal. I haven't spend two years here vandalizing articles, or I would have been tossed out long ago.

2684:

The Innings is interesting for the amount of movies done and the success rate achieved.Infact of the 63 movies Bachchan did in that period only 7 movies faced monetary losses of any kinds, thus a loss making movie used to an Event for Amitabh Bachchan.

1515:

heard this (though I've something similar about Sean Connery, numerous times). Unless there's good evidence that the guy wears a wig, or has worn one over his career, I ask that people please just stop throwing this in the article every now and then.

497:. Wouldn't rate more than a sentence or two in personal life section, however. Praps hook would be educated, cultured man, elite background, fluent English, homes and businesses abroad? Might shake up some stereotypes among non-Asian readers. 1698:

Dr. Amitabh Bachchan. If he's been given the title honorarily, it ought to be used. But honestly I don't know about the conventions regarding this especially since the doctorate was honorary. It might be a good idea to ask around. Try asking

2867:

file a fresh petition in the Supreme Court, seeking action against them for their role in anti-Sikh riots in Delhi in 1984." Have they filed a case? The law of natural justice states that any person accused of any crime has to be treated as

385:

The picture is not from Deewar, as Amitabh was much younger then. See Knowledge's entry on Deewar for more. Another film with the samename was recently made, and it starred Amitabh too, but I'm pretty sure that is not the Deewar in question

167:

These are two diferent films with the same name. In the Filmography they are mentioned separately but link to the same 1975 movie page. The 1975 movie is a classic,and the 2004 one (not a remake, an entirely different film) is a dud.

893:

You spoke too soon, Commando. I just finished copyediting. Less words rather than more, and very short paragraphs. What works on a page just doesn't work as well on screen. I hope you can see why I made most of the choices I did.

991:

Anyhow, calling my article's language "Hinglish", I accept, as I used slang. Anyhow, if you are still in doubt, I would like to invite you for a live English competition, so you must know the difference between yourself and me.

441:

to write standard English and more important to get the facts straight. Other people can clean up the prose. If you're an Amitabh fan, you could make articles for the Amitabh movies that don't already have their own articles.

1288:

We keep removing the fangush, which leaves the article a bit bare. What we could use are quotes from histories of Indian cinema, reviewers talking about his acting style, etc. But that would require some research beyond film

303:

I am working towards fixing it a bit, but i have no expertise on the subject, i would just like a higher quality article. the tag has been placed so that any readers who happen on the page look at it a bit more critically.

2680:

Also can be said that modes of promotions has also increased by leaps and bounds.But leaving the above behind, and going movie to movie, Amitabh Bachchan hit an extreme purple patch for almost 15-16 years between 1973-88.

2835:. Secondly, until it is written well, in a comprehensive and clear way, and supported by reliable source (one of the sources is unreliable), this info is cannot remain here. Also good to note that this user has violated 2378:"Later, he was struck with with an illness called Myasthenia Gravis. This happened either because of the heavy medication that he took during his Coolie accident or because of the blood transfusion that he had received." 1012:

I think some people get insanely carried away with reverting, and this might just be from a misunderstanding of how reversions are meant to work. According to Knowledge, reversions, in general, are to be made to correct

564:

however, it is supposed to be an encyclopedic article, and it makes sense to separate it a bit more, especially considering that this isn't a biography, it's an article. separating his life is something that is helpful.

1274:

together more coherently, even if it means adopting a less formal tone. Objectivity — a good thing — does not have to imply formality and coldness, and I think the latter two things are exactly what haunt this piece.

1058:

not one to be sited on an on-line encyclopaedia. Unless something more verifiable is out there< I don't think the "wig" thing belongs in the trivia section, as though it were common-knowledge or little-known (but

1793:

This article is categorised Category:Légion d'honneur recipients. I have been unable to find any evidence that he has been awarded the Légion d'honneur, including looking through articles in the French Knowledge on

507:

You are right. Non-Asians do stereotype what 'asians' can get up to! Would be fascinating to re-structure half these hagiographies so that they upend and contradict assumptions. Your first! I am just a beginner ;o)

1778:

At long last I've managed to find a reasonable-looking recent picture of Amitabh and got the owner to release the copyright accordingly. So now this article can be improved by having a good illustrative picture.

537:

Bachchan is not a surname. It is the pen name, a usual practice among Hindi poets, taken by Harivansh rai shrivastava- Amitabh's father. Later the family have adopted it as a surname. Made this minor correction.

789:

I far prefer the newer edit I just did. If anyone sees any problems with it, please bring them up here, so that a mutually agreed-upon page may be set. The previous edit strikes me as scanty and biased. Thanks.

856:

I'm exhausted and cranky now, so I'm not going to edit, but I'd advise you to stop and listen to other people before you go on adding material. You are probably going to find most of what you added edited out.

2724:

This Period Signifies the return of Big B from the political Arena back to movie business, again here he didnt find the same success as he did in this prime. Notable movies are Agneepath,Hum and Aaj Ka Arjun.

1664:

updated by myriad different users from many, many corners of the world, where English is used in various different, "correct" ways. Further, Bachchan's is an article on a person the major audience of whom is

1802:

and its sub-cats. If anyone has evidence for this award being made, please provode it and, this being the highest award in France, it should surely be mentioned in the text and not just a category listing.

2713:

This Period is the start of the Career of Big B, he mostly struggled around for few years before breaking big time in Zanjeer. The notable movies of this time are Saat Hindustani, Anand and Bombay to Goa.

182:

There is a clearly defined period of his films where he simply succeeded at whatever he did,and an overlapping one where he always played the "angry young man". I think this should be a separate section.

2461:

I definitely agree that blogs, (even bollyspice.com), youtube etc are not reliable, but boxofficeindia is again the official site of box office figures in India so I'm waiting for explanations why it is

2677:

On the other hand there have been booms too for the industry with Music(in 90′s) , Sattellite/Cable(2000′s) providing a very good avenue for Movie Revenue thus helping a lot in the movie’s recovery.

1668:"natively English." Sure, problems arise, but I do not see this article as, by any means, "shameful" (not a quotation). The illness, I'm quite sure, is "fact," and, at most, that means it should be 1842:

This article has a horribly long trivia section that really conains a lot of non-encyclopedic material that needs to be removed. It swamps the article, and in some cases material is plain wrong.

643:

The article has been going through a period of upheaval and there's lots of clumsy writing there now. I don't have time to copyedit now. Autumnleaf, you still here? Somehow, it should be done.

1496:

As far as I know, it has never been verified that Amitabh Bachchan wears a wig, and, except where it's "obvious" that he's using one (e.g., in "Armaan," "Boom"), the idea is mere speculation.

1349:

it with older text) to make it better. If something troubles you, and you feel you can't "fix" it without reverting, please take the matter to the discussion page (i.e., to this page). If you

2935:

why is there no mention of his win of the first national award for agnnepath, was due to strong lobbying when malayalam actor Thilakan was the one supposed to win it for Perumthachan in 1991

2863:. Let's see what these say. IBNlive site says, "Bollywood star Amitabh Bachchan, senior Congress leaders and police officials figure in a list of 200 persons against whom Sikh organizations 132:

We need to shift Amitabh Bachchans list of movies to a new page. The key ones can be mentioned here with a link to the list of all films. Should I start a list of Amitabh Bachchan films?

1342:

don't revert good faith edits. Reverting is a little too powerful sometimes, hence the three-revert rule. Don't succumb to the temptation, unless you're reverting very obvious vandalism'

1261:

updates, and petty trivialities. Nevertheless, Amitabh Bachchan is not a small, fly-by-night star. He's arguably one of India's greatest-ever film icons and personalities, and is even

1547:

our rules for biographies of living people -- nothing without a reference, and especially nothing that could be construed as slanderous. Bofors scandal? Myesthenia gravis? Sheesh!

2518:

16:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Amitabh Bachahan was born in what is now know as faislabad pakistan. as mentioned on p.t.v. prime tv sky channel 792 by nazia malik on 14/11/2010.

2407:

In April 2010, he revealed that he has cirrhosis, a condition that developed as a result of blood transfusion from an accident he had while filming nearly three decades earlier.(

1194:

Stephen Colbert talked about Amitabh Bachchan having a rivalry with Shah Rukh Khan. I believe everything Stephen Colbert says should be on Knowledge, but what do YOU guys think?

1370:

careers. If an affair ends up in divorce court or a murder charge, then it's newsworthy. Otherwise, I think it's solely the concern of the people involved and their families.

1757:

Personally, I'm not too fond of the seemigly unavoidable "criticism" section that winds up on just about everyone's page. Unless the person has made headlines for something

1256:

Amitabh Bachchan's seems to be one of the most under-written, scantily-packed articles of a major celebrity on Knowledge. People like Marlon Brando and Al Pacino have much,

2895:

were not butchered by mobs led by Congress stalwarts like Jagdish Tytler & Sajjan Kumar. Why don't you use your energies to drag the real culprits to the dock? Thanks.

2782:

is also a guideline that seems to support keeping it in. Are there Knowledge policies that would support removing it that I'm not familiar with? Remember, while we seek

2786:

on how Knowledge policy applies to articles, that's based in policy- editors whose reasoning isn't based in policy aren't given as much weight in a disagreement, since

1761:"controversial," it makes much more sense to me that information worth incorporating into a "criticism" section be placed directly in the body of the article, instead. 2640:

Another sad victim of manic filmographitis. Let's just retain key (important) films in a simple partial filmography section, and leave the rest of the documenting to

1561:

November 24, 2002; the link there is to the author's website. Would like a source for his exoneration, which of course you'ld look for before deleting, right? Cheers

1075:

whole "cricket scores" mindset, in which actors are compared in terms of awards won. We're not here to rank actors. We'll just see who is remembered in twenty years!

1531:

I would say that ID Khan's recent edits are all ostensible vandalism, nothing else. Perhaps an eye needs to be kept out for further edits to this page by this user.

2456:. No indication is given to your claim that box office india, bollyvista.com (which are used in featured articles, and can do NOTHING with that) etx are unreliable. 2811:

A second look at the source, though, seems to indicate that he's been charged, but not yet proven guilty. Wouldn't it be better to wait until after he is tried? -

1597:

As for the myesthenia gravis -- what's the source for that? I only read Rediff and Outlook India for Indian news, and I haven't seen anything like that mentioned.

1852:

Please note that not every detail about a person's life needs to be documented in an article. Only those items that actually enhance the article should be used.

583:

changes without consultation will draw in the 'Big B' diehards and I don't want to be on duty when they land! Really like your drive though, Yoasif. We need you

1331:

Ninety percent of the time, you'll find that they actually are acting in good faith (and wouldn't you have looked stupid if you'd accused them of being evil)."

959:

and will do Laal Baadshah, Major Saab and other of his 1999 films soon. Everyone else should join in and do articles for some of his other films too. Thanks.

973:

The "Big B" link for an artist on Suburban Noize Records wiki article links to this actor, as opposed to the rapper who works with Brad Daddy X and company.

568:

if there are issues with the article feeling like snippets, perhaps there could be some additional writing done to patch up seemingly disparate sentences.

1043:

AS far as I know Amitabh does not wear a toupee. I am deleting that line, and will keep deleting it, unless someone can back it up with a reliable source.

995:

One more thing; Always try to dictate the mistakes and errors, except mentioning them. As it seems, that you are willing to hold a title "Pride of Proud".

1442:

defining interview that took place as soon as Amitabh came out of hospital and told all about his health-scare, including telling-all about Rekha, etc.

472:

filmography. I removed the names of films and just said that he has appeared in hit films. This may be the only way to prevent the para from bloating.

84:

Oh well! It was a first attempt at anything on Knowledge so I wasn't expecting it to be perfect. Let me rework it and lets see what comes out. Thanks

2469:{{Original research|date=November 2007}} {{Fansite|date=December 2007}} {{Cleanup|date=November 2007}} {{rewrite}} {{Refimprove|date=November 2007}} 2754: 1151:

I removed a lot of fangush that had been added recently, some utterly trivial awards and honors, and corrected many non-standard English locutions.

1294:

I don't have a very large selection of books on Indian cinema, but I could skim what I have. If you want to do some library research, be my guest!

2312:

This section has not been removed. I just merged it with Career Slump 1988-1999 instead as it was all part of the decline in Bachchan's career.

757:

we need to make it a "selected filmography" section and keep only the films that were largest grossing/significant to his career in some way.

289:, but lack of selectivity may have had something to do with his later career doldrums." "At the same time, Gandhi's Congress Party government 1845:

I am moving the entire trivia section here to the talk page. Please incorporate items in the main article text (not as a trivia section) and

2208:, he did much of his own stunt work even though he was 58 years old at the time. During one fight scene, he jumped 30 feet down a waterfall. 622:

i think we should start working on adding the character names of the role that bacchan has played in the filmography section. (from imdb).

1557:

Bofors should be there, explains his quick exit from politics and incomplete term. It is not in violation of BLP, its an article from The

1115:

It seems to me that the article is written in a very formal tone. I'm going to remove the notice in the next day unless someone objects.

297:

the actor's first name is also used too much in subject headings; the whole article is about him, this kind of thing seems a bit much.

2831:

First of all, I can't see the notability of the case and how it stands in an encyclopedia article about Bachchan. He has been part of

2525: 216: 2872:

until found so. So, even if these organisations file a case against Mr. Bachchan, until and unless he is proven guilty, he cannot be

2821: 2800: 2448:

By saying "total craft", you don't really give a genuine reason and you didn't give. You're just quickly removing sites which names

561:

well, the article already reads too much like a story, which may be a reason that you aren't fond of the new organizational scheme.

110: 700:

Could we have a BBC link substantiating 'he was declared Superstar of the Millenium in 1999 in an international poll hosted by the

2452:

to be unreliable. I want you to come with every source HERE and say why it's unreliable. According to what? I had a read through

1619:

his life. Whether or not the idea, as it is presented in the article, needs to be revised, I feel the scandal should at least be

201:

Yes one movie missing is called "Wayaltyi Babu" I may have the name incorrect . I do have the movie on VHS, an Punjabi movie!!!

2929:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 1406:

thing you need to worry about is if information is poorly sourced. Remember, this page is an encylopaedia entry, not a fanpage.

1397:

This is not a question of anyone's "opinion" of what should and shouldn't be in the article. Amitabh's affair with Rekha was a

92: 71: 66: 1649:, for example.) It's a matter of verbosity, misuse of vocabulary, and complete deafness to the rhythm and shape of sentences. 2259:, Bachchan was almost killed by a camel but was saved when the dromedary's kick was deflected by the traditional Rajasthani 1429:

Zora, sometimes I wish you wouldn't rake over points that have been discussed in full elsewhere. Stardust/Cineblitz/Filmfare

760:

this came up in the peer review, and the section could use some trimming; there are other sources for this info (like imdb).

272:

I have added a cleanup tag to this article to address some issues that I feel make it less than an ideal wikipedia article.

640:

avert!). I could be argued out of this position if one of the regular editors thinks I'm wrong and gives a good argument.

2892:"The documentary, however, does not have any clipping of Bachchan making any such statement of which he is being accused." 2886:

Now please refer to the fact that the All India Sikh Students Federation actually created these charges which can be seen

2428:. If it is not addressed pronto, I will be blanking large parts of the article. We cant have an article full of OR with 331: 1799: 2750: 2736: 710:

Could we have a few examples of/sources for/names: 'he has appeared in several hit movies. He has also appeared in many

2472:

If you restore the page without discussing, I'll turn to an administrator and we will solve it ASAP with him. Thanks,

2264: 2211: 1184:

I found on a blog full with film extracts with Amitabh Bachchan. It is very funny because one can subtitle these film

2856: 733:

Could we have more detail about: 'In 1990, he won the National Award for his portrayal of a mafia don in Agneepath'

120:

ABCL didn't produce Bombay and Bandit Queen. Rather it was the distributor. This can be corrected in the main page.

2879:

The citing of Indiainfo.com news titled "Big B splits Sikh outfits into two" is even more dubious. Please refer to

2495:] . Could anyone verify whether the birthday of Bachchan sahab corresponds with the age mentioned in this article. 38: 2733: 1816:. I agree about the fact needing to be in the main text. As you can see, the article needs a huge amount of work. 2855:

Mr. Babu Mann, it seems, is hell bent on including a genocide section in the article. He has cited two sources -

1772: 348:

where is the picture from? (what movie, i mean). it should be mentioned, and if an article exists, linked to. --

2256: 2242: 1965: 882:

Wow, I'm glad to see that, after the "clean-up," most of my changes have been retained. Thanks very much. :-D

3242: 2351:

The section "1982 injury during filming" says "The whole world was praying for him." Its sounds ridiculous.

245:

He's such a major star and such a big piece of Bollywood history that it's important to have a good article.

3300: 2746: 2529: 2500: 2221: 715: 374: 356:

Dunno. Someone else contributed it. If you can find a better picture, please do! I've never liked this one.

212: 2730: 934:

Which Govinda movie are you guys talking about? I loved "Raghu Romeo," but it was hardly "side-splitting."

805:

How does one go about changing the image of the article? I don't much care for the current one. Thank you.

2663: 2649: 2595: 2546: 2057: 938: 445: 2352: 2338: 2267:, in a show of respect for the 'hero of the week', also wore a rajasthani turban at the end of the show. 1017:

not to change something because you think it's "not quite right." The goal of an article on Knowledge is

2817: 2796: 2197:

He had banned the media for 15 years during his peak – a ban that shook the film industry by its roots.

2133: 1160:

I've removed the sentence "He is one of the most prominant actors in Bollywood." It is a POV statement.

486:

He seems to have business interests and homes abroad - too trivial to collate and add to the main page?

106: 47: 17: 3184: 2883:

from Times of India, which is a reliable source, on the same issue and you will come to know the truth.

1687:

Should we refer to him, in the opening paragraph, as "Amitabh Bachchan," or as "Dr. Amitabh Bachchan"?

1195: 370: 208: 2366: 1765: 1691: 1676: 1628: 1535: 1520: 1388: 1358: 1309: 1281: 1245: 1161: 1063: 909: 886: 871: 833: 809: 794: 420: 2742: 2707:

For Fairness purpose its important to highlight the not so successfull periods of Bachchan’s Career.

2521: 2304: 2255:

again when he was featured as the "Alpha Dog" for the week of February 12, 2007. While on the set of

1924: 1825:

Thanks for that. I hadn't noticed that story, beieve it or not, because I was in France at the time!

677: 204: 98: 2787: 2783: 2610: 2514:

Amitabh Bachahan's birth time as mentioned in this article is 12 hours behind his real birthtime. -

2439: 2326:

The Flag on Amitach Bachchan site is not of India. Please check and change the flag to Indian Flag

2215:

At the age of 64, Amitabh Bachchan created a cinematic world record. He shocked the entire unit of

1141: 1508:"cant find a source, just a rumour. If you re-include provide a non-blog, non-speculative source" 2900: 2496: 2281: 2252: 2233: 1138: 2466:

As for these tags. I want to see explanations and examples that will provide their necessarity:

2389: 1089:

Pratulka restored his version of the first para as well as the "notable films" in the infobox.

85: 1807: 941:

which is a very funny movie and deserved to be Amitabh's first hit since his comeback in 1997.

861: 319:

tone it down by degrees, until we get to a level we can sustain against fan assaults <g: -->

3315: 3257: 3199: 3141: 3083: 3025: 2967: 2659: 2645: 2562: 2373: 2182:

He is the only actor who achieved at least one hit every year for 14 consecutive years - from

2102: 2027: 612: 576: 555: 2880: 2860: 2198: 1624:

could stand to be bettered, but, in my opinion, it is currently not a badly-written article.

2812: 2791: 2779: 2625: 2577: 2232:

was featured with Amitabh Bachchan in segment "We the MEdiator" of popular news-comedy show

102: 3344: 3328: 3286: 3270: 3228: 3212: 3170: 3154: 3112: 3096: 3054: 3038: 2996: 2980: 2393: 2273: 2237: 2015: 1982: 1886: 1870: 1558: 1227: 1048: 741: 673: 654: 584: 509: 487: 2952: 2247: 1972:

His favourite screen name is Vijay, which he had as his character name in over 20 movies.

1795: 1724:. I think usually its press for the uni and 'good form' not to be used by the recipient. 1354:

to keep things "as they are" for nothing but the sake of preservation. Thanks very much.

1209: 547:

life, career, public life, family life. That's a reasonably chronological presentation.

2904: 2850: 2826: 2805: 2775: 2758: 2667: 2653: 2629: 2614: 2606: 2581: 2566: 2533: 2515: 2504: 2483: 2442: 2408: 2397: 2369: 2355: 2341: 2316: 2313: 2307: 2229: 2216: 2190: 2151: 2045: 2039: 1858: 1829: 1820: 1783: 1751: 1728: 1707: 1653: 1639: 1610: 1575: 1565: 1551: 1470: 1460: 1446: 1423: 1410: 1374: 1298: 1230: 1216: 1198: 1174: 1164: 1155: 1119: 1105: 1079: 1051: 1033: 963: 960: 945: 942: 929: 898: 776: 744: 737: 681: 657: 647: 629: 587: 531: 522: 512: 501: 490: 476: 405: 390: 377: 360: 338: 324: 262: 187: 172: 136: 114: 2941:

Last edited at 13:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 20:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

2603:

Please correct the spelling of own in the line "offered to sacrifice their won limbs"

300:

referring to the actor as "big b" also seems a bit colloquial, and not encyclopedic.

3126: 3068: 3010: 2926: 2896: 2840: 2836: 2737:

http://boxofficekings.blogspot.in/2012/08/amitabh-bachchans-golden-run-1973-1988.html

2473: 2432: 2422: 2334: 2209: 2145: 2128: 2084: 2063: 1941: 1855: 1826: 1804: 1725: 1717: 1700: 1562: 1457: 1213: 956: 925:

don't think was a big hit in India. Perils of cross-cultural communication, I guess.

550:

I can't do it right now. But unless someone convinces me otherwise, I will <g: -->

275:

The writing often seems a bit too campy, and not scholarly/encyclopedic in attitude.

1813: 1747:

Depends on whether the criticism can be reliably sourced. What do you have in mind?

1511:

The claim is not even a "rumor"; I'm a pretty big fan of Amitabh Bachchan, and I've

2641: 2558: 2453: 2169: 2157: 2069: 1996: 1927:). In this movie Amitabh and Jaya play a successful singing couple. In addition to 1914: 1901: 1896: 1891: 1881: 1817: 1780: 1748: 1713: 1704: 1646: 1636: 1467: 1443: 1407: 1321: 1171: 841: 822: 387: 184: 169: 2493:

Recently I found some information regarding the birthday of Shri Amitabh Bachchan

2225:

by completing 23 scenes in 5 hours....an unheard-of feat in any part of the world.

754:

the filmography section needs to be cleaned up; there are too many films there...

2771: 2688:

Also, Amitabh Bachchan had atleast 1 hit a year for 14 straight years(1973-86).

2621: 2573: 2285: 2033: 2021: 1975:

His parents initially planned to name him "Inquilaab", which means "Revolution".

1947: 1030: 711: 626: 609: 601:

so -- i reiterate, please post specific examples of what doesn't work, and what

573: 349: 335: 305: 142:

Be realistic, practical and focus on information and its structure while editing

133: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2734:

http://web.archive.org/web/20030801213418/http://boxofficeindia.com/amitabh.htm

1978:

He is ambidextrous, though on-screen he is most often seen using his left hand.

1438:

perfectly reliable to cite. As a matter of fact, this particular interview was

1985:. Now known for his powerful, baritone voice, he was inexplicably turned down. 773: 2778:

could be improved with some reference to his response, if he has made one.

2572:

Declined - not an urgent request, can be done when the page is unprotected.

2268: 2004: 1721: 1650: 1607: 1548: 1420: 1371: 1295: 1152: 1116: 1102: 1076: 926: 895: 858: 697:

Could editors please bring sources to the discussion page on the following:

644: 552: 528: 519: 498: 473: 442: 417: 402: 357: 321: 259: 246: 2280:, and other fronts wants to nominate Amitabh Bachchan for the candidacy of 1185: 2418:

This article is total cruft. I have replaced dozens of non-RS cites with

1456:

the concern of those involved and not suitable topic for an encyclopedia.

1433:

reliable sources depending upon the particular content; they are also the

518:

If you keep flattering me, I'm going to think that you're a publicist ...

2090: 1929: 1919: 1906: 1672:(sorry, but I'm sick of seeing "reference" used as a verb ), not erased. 1029:

Both are almost current, Early Career should have a younder snap of his.

121: 2731:

http://web.archive.org/web/20100724072320/http://www.boxofficekings.com/

1129:

how many people are with me to vote this article for "Feature Article"?

625:

it's tedious work, but it should be done for a more complete article. --

598:

pages, and the new scheme emulates good articles much more effectively.

2184: 2163: 2139: 2114: 2096: 2009: 1959: 1935: 1488:

Was Shah Rukh Khan no good (I hear that his first episode has aired)?

2260: 2175: 2120: 2108: 2075: 2051: 1953: 2658:

Creating a separate page for the filmography is a very good option.

1988:

Has a brother, Ajitabh, with whom he was reunited later in his life.

669:

Filmography table can be reformatted so that it occupies less space.

1981:

Before entering the film industry, Bachchan applied for a job with

1270:

be an unwelcome, "non-encyclopaedic" contribution to this article.

2330: 719: 2383:

may exacerbate the problem in someone who already has myasthenia

2082:

He has done playback singing for many of his own movies such as

723: 2551:

Please add the following newly created category to the artcle:

2127:

In the 1970s and early 1980s he was frequently paired opposite

455:

Golmal (Special Appearance) Khatta Meetha (Special Appearance)

2277: 2204: 1635:

appreciate that it is the author's own website but,... hmm...

1384:

it could be placed under "Trivia," but even that's debatable.

701: 25: 334:

especially. i'd appreciate help, especially from zora. :) --

1606:

Those are just two things. I couldn't bear to read it all.

1208:

It seems this section has been here before but was deleted

718:. He has supported campaigns for eye donations and against 1402:

offscreen events and achieved notoriety for the same. The

527:

Oh, and any quotable sources for houses and businesses?

496:

Possibly not. We've got Hrithik's extra thumb <g: -->

2921: 1874:

was Amitabh's first and the last black and white movie.

998:

Remember, I must be taught, as I was someone new here.

1210:

http://www.popstarsplus.com/actors_amitabhbachchan.htm

2839:. And I agree it's better to wait until he is tried. 2372:

The part which deals with Amitabh Bachchan's health (

2131:

and together they starred in many hit films such as

1505:

It was edited out by Dmanning with the explanation,

1322:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Simplified_Ruleset

2296:

Entrepreneurial setback 1996-1999 (section removed)

1933:, Amitabh and Jaya acted together in films such as 821:

the family's artist name...corect me if im wrong --

2636:Do we really need a mile-long filmography, people? 2358:yeah its been removed. It did sound exaggerated. 840:writes Bachchan, atleast what he is reffered to-- 1320:Here's a little information found on Knowledge ( 2925:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 2173:. They last appeared together in the flop film 1226:lot of vandalism. toda he was reported as dead 955:I have created an article for one of his films 330:ok, well i'm back in here, starting to work on 2301:miserable failure with ABCL between 1996-1999 2919:The comment(s) below were originally left at 2438:tags sitting on every sentence for eternity. 1991:He has a double M.A. (Master of Arts) degree. 8: 463:Movie Haath (1973) should be "Bandhe Haath" 3305:Amitabh Bachchan: Candidancy for President? 1994:He learned sign language for his 2005 film 736:Can we have detail on: 'He has also won 12 91:You (whoever wrote this) needs to read the 2376:) is filled with factual errors. It says: 1266:young man," but some more substance would 1047:That comment was by me, some days ago :D 1001:Wish you best of luck, with kind wishes. 232:PLZ add this Movie to Amitabh Filmography 224:PLZ add this Movie to Amitabh Filmography 2670:amitabh Bachchan's Golden Run 1973-1988 714:for commercial products and for various 3189:Bachchan learns sign language for Black 2944: 653:Will be returning to the fold shortly! 283:and never seemed to wear out his appeal 281:"He acted in several films every year, 3340: 3336: 3324: 3313: 3282: 3278: 3266: 3255: 3224: 3220: 3208: 3197: 3166: 3162: 3150: 3139: 3108: 3104: 3092: 3081: 3050: 3046: 3034: 3023: 2992: 2988: 2976: 2965: 2770:It seems to me that the section meets 1743:? Kittu 11:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2554:Category:National Film Award Winners 146:This aint a fan page, folks Thanks ! 7: 3247:Amitabh Bachchan sets another record 3131:Bachchan applied for All India radio 1137:A pic from Sarkar would be better.-- 572:"early" life, or life in general. -- 482:Miscellaneous businesses and homes.. 1703:, he's good at that sort of thing. 467:List of hit films after Mohabbatein 2073:. He also played a triple role in 672:Would be great to have more pics. 228:aab tumhare havale vatan sathiyon 24: 2927:several discussions in past years 293:from accusations of corruption." 2704:36 ALL INDIA HITS(From 1973-88) 2698:denotes equal universal success 750:cleanup the filmopgraphy section 425: 29: 2876:for the 1984 genocide of sikhs. 1917:after the success of the movie 93:wikipedia:Neutral point of view 2922:Talk:Amitabh Bachchan/Comments 2356:03:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 1739:Is it good to start a menu of 1485:We miss him terribly on KBC.. 1052:20:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC) 968: 951:Articles for more of his films 421:21:50, 15 September 2005 (UTC) 1: 3073:Bachchan's is an ambidextrous 2630:16:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2615:01:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2582:16:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2567:13:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2534:18:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 2370:23:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 2276:in conjunction with the TDP, 1800:fr:Catégorie:Légion d'honneur 1784:03:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1752:04:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 1729:09:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 1708:05:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 1542:This article has been damaged 1499:Someone added the following: 1175:06:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 1165:23:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC) 1142:06:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 1120:10:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 1034:21:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 682:23:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 648:13:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 613:23:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 588:21:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 577:01:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 556:01:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 406:20:57, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 352:23:15, August 23, 2005 (UTC) 339:02:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 308:23:02, August 23, 2005 (UTC) 219:) 00:16, April 16, 2004 (UTC) 137:13:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 115:12:52, 5 September 2001 (UTC) 2788:Knowledge is not a democracy 2668:00:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 2654:05:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 2484:16:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2443:04:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC) 1654:02:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1640:02:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 1611:08:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1566:06:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1552:06:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 1471:03:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1461:03:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1447:02:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 1424:06:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 1411:06:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC) 1375:02:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1299:07:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 1231:06:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 1217:10:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1199:19:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 1156:09:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 1106:04:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 1080:05:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC) 777:20:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 630:06:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 532:20:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 523:20:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 513:12:44, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 502:02:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 491:01:10, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 477:20:44, 14 October 2005 (UTC) 446:02:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC) 410: 391:23:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 196: 188:23:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 173:23:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 2957:Bachchan's first salary pay 2759:19:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC) 2588:Edit Request - fix spelling 2540:Edit Request - add category 1849:stuff that has been used. 1588:newspapers -- not in court. 969:Link point's to wrong place 844:11:38, April 30 2006 (UTC) 825:15:18, Aprli 23 2006 (UTC) 745:13:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC) 658:01:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 378:03:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC) 361:23:27, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 325:23:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 178:Golden Age/ Angry Young Man 3365: 3243:"prithweesh.wordpress.com" 2398:22:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 2385:, but would not cause it. 2251:Bachchan was mentioned on 1859:18:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 1830:19:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 1821:15:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1808:11:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1773:Image:Amitabh Bachchan.jpg 862:08:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 451:Two more films to be added 369:I think its from Deewar -- 2934: 2780:Knowledge is not censored 2505:12:35, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 2342:15:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 2272:In February of 2007, the 1913:Amitabh Bachchan married 1574:WP has an article on the 1132: 964:14:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 946:14:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 635:Recent illness, rewriting 285:." "While he was a star, 263:08:25, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 249:15:25, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) 124:19:31, 10 Aug 2003 (UTC) 3015:Bachchan's original name 2905:17:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 2851:15:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 2827:15:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 2806:15:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 2317:00:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 2308:23:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 2243:Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham 2202:While filming the movie 1966:Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham 1884:5000 for his first film 1190:Shah Rukh Khan snubbing? 930:19:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 716:non-profit organizations 88:06:07 Feb 3, 2003 (UTC) 2329:Amitabh wasn't born in 2222:Shootout at Lokhandwala 1877:He is 6'2"(190cm) Tall. 899:04:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 426:Anon's revison reverted 3323:Check date values in: 3265:Check date values in: 3207:Check date values in: 3149:Check date values in: 3091:Check date values in: 3033:Check date values in: 2975:Check date values in: 2489:TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN 2058:Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2007:in many films such as 1241:P.E.T.A., I believe). 939:Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 937:We were talking about 618:adding character names 431:I'm repeated it here: 411:Amitabh's early career 197:Amitabh'S Film missing 190:(I have signed! heh!) 2263:he was wearing. Host 2134:Roti Kapda Aur Makaan 1788: 1070:Recent springcleaning 847: 287:none of that mattered 207:comment was added by 101:comment was added by 42:of past discussions. 18:Talk:Amitabh Bachchan 3308:. Retrieved 11 March 3250:. Retrieved 11 March 3192:. Retrieved 11 March 3134:. Retrieved 11 March 3076:. Retrieved 11 March 3018:. Retrieved 11 March 2960:. Retrieved 11 March 2701:SUCCESS RATIO-88.8% 1925:Hrishikesh Mukherjee 541: 313:had been previously. 150:Miserable Favoritism 1796:fr:Amitabh Bachchan 1336:More to the point, 1328:"Assume good faith: 1147:Yet another cleanup 878:Changes -- Clean-Up 3335:Unknown parameter 3277:Unknown parameter 3219:Unknown parameter 3185:"harmonyindia.org" 3161:Unknown parameter 3103:Unknown parameter 3045:Unknown parameter 2987:Unknown parameter 2915:Assessment comment 2833:many controversies 2766:Regarding genocide 2747:Prakumsoon14051982 2337:, simple as that. 2282:President of India 2253:The Colbert Report 2234:The Colbert Report 1455: 542:Reorg doesn't work 163:Deewar (1975/2004) 2939: 2938: 2762: 2745:comment added by 2524:comment added by 2374:myasthenia gravis 2333:, he was born in 2028:The Great Gambler 1453: 707:Done<<< 220: 117: 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3356: 3349: 3348: 3342: 3338: 3332: 3326: 3321: 3319: 3311: 3309: 3301:"naachgaana.com" 3297: 3291: 3290: 3284: 3280: 3274: 3268: 3263: 3261: 3253: 3251: 3239: 3233: 3232: 3226: 3222: 3216: 3210: 3205: 3203: 3195: 3193: 3181: 3175: 3174: 3168: 3164: 3158: 3152: 3147: 3145: 3137: 3135: 3123: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3106: 3100: 3094: 3089: 3087: 3079: 3077: 3065: 3059: 3058: 3052: 3048: 3042: 3036: 3031: 3029: 3021: 3019: 3007: 3001: 3000: 2994: 2990: 2984: 2978: 2973: 2971: 2963: 2961: 2949: 2932: 2931: 2924: 2847: 2825: 2804: 2761: 2739: 2600: 2594: 2550: 2536: 2510:Wrong Birth Time 2480: 2437: 2431: 2427: 2421: 2228:On Jan 9, 2007, 2003:He has played a 1789:Légion d'honneur 1340:"Particularly, ' 1133:that's a bad pic 848:Commando's edits 202: 96: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3334: 3322: 3312: 3307: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3276: 3264: 3254: 3249: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3218: 3206: 3196: 3191: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3160: 3148: 3138: 3133: 3125: 3124: 3120: 3102: 3090: 3080: 3075: 3067: 3066: 3062: 3044: 3032: 3022: 3017: 3009: 3008: 3004: 2986: 2974: 2964: 2959: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2920: 2917: 2841: 2815: 2794: 2774:, although its 2768: 2740: 2699: 2638: 2598: 2592: 2590: 2555: 2544: 2542: 2519: 2512: 2491: 2474: 2435: 2429: 2425: 2419: 2416: 2405: 2364: 2349: 2324: 2298: 2274:Samajwadi Party 2265:Stephen Colbert 2238:Stephen Colbert 1983:All India Radio 1887:Saat Hindustani 1871:Saat Hindustani 1866: 1840: 1791: 1776: 1741:criticism of AB 1737: 1685: 1559:Financial Times 1544: 1529: 1494: 1483: 1367: 1318: 1254: 1238: 1224: 1206: 1192: 1182: 1149: 1135: 1127: 1125:feature article 1113: 1087: 1072: 1041: 1027: 1010: 985: 971: 953: 918: 880: 850: 818: 803: 787: 769: 752: 738:Filmfare Awards 695: 690: 666: 637: 620: 544: 484: 469: 461: 456: 453: 428: 413: 398: 346: 278:some examples: 270: 255: 239: 234: 226: 203:—The preceding 199: 180: 165: 152: 144: 130: 97:—The preceding 82: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3362: 3360: 3351: 3350: 3292: 3234: 3176: 3118: 3060: 3002: 2943: 2937: 2936: 2916: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2884: 2877: 2767: 2764: 2697: 2637: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2553: 2541: 2538: 2511: 2508: 2490: 2487: 2464: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2415: 2412: 2404: 2401: 2388: 2363: 2360: 2353:Suchitraramani 2348: 2347:Health section 2345: 2339:203.214.98.123 2323: 2320: 2297: 2294: 2292: 2290: 2289: 2270: 2249: 2230:Shah Rukh Khan 2226: 2217:Apoorva Lakhia 2213: 2200: 2195: 2191:Aakhree Raasta 2180: 2125: 2080: 2046:Aakhree Raasta 2040:Satte Pe Satta 2001: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1979: 1976: 1973: 1970: 1911: 1878: 1875: 1865: 1862: 1839: 1838:Trivia Section 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1790: 1787: 1775: 1770: 1755: 1754: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1710: 1684: 1681: 1657: 1656: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1576:Bofors scandal 1569: 1568: 1543: 1540: 1528: 1525: 1493: 1490: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1366: 1363: 1317: 1314: 1302: 1301: 1291: 1290: 1253: 1250: 1237: 1234: 1223: 1220: 1205: 1202: 1191: 1188: 1181: 1178: 1148: 1145: 1134: 1131: 1126: 1123: 1112: 1109: 1086: 1083: 1071: 1068: 1055: 1054: 1040: 1037: 1026: 1023: 1009: 1006: 984: 981: 979: 976: 970: 967: 952: 949: 917: 914: 902: 901: 879: 876: 849: 846: 817: 814: 802: 799: 786: 783: 781: 768: 765: 763: 751: 748: 694: 693:Sources please 691: 689: 686: 685: 684: 670: 665: 662: 661: 660: 636: 633: 619: 616: 591: 590: 560: 543: 540: 535: 534: 525: 505: 504: 483: 480: 468: 465: 460: 459:Incorrect Name 457: 454: 452: 449: 438: 437: 427: 424: 412: 409: 397: 396:Rumor re Rekha 394: 383: 382: 381: 380: 364: 363: 345: 342: 328: 327: 315: 314: 296: 269: 266: 254: 251: 238: 237:Major revision 235: 233: 230: 225: 222: 198: 195: 193: 179: 176: 164: 161: 157: 151: 148: 143: 140: 129: 126: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3361: 3346: 3341:|access-date= 3330: 3317: 3306: 3302: 3296: 3293: 3288: 3283:|access-date= 3272: 3259: 3248: 3244: 3238: 3235: 3230: 3225:|access-date= 3214: 3201: 3190: 3186: 3180: 3177: 3172: 3167:|access-date= 3156: 3143: 3132: 3128: 3122: 3119: 3114: 3109:|access-date= 3098: 3085: 3074: 3070: 3064: 3061: 3056: 3051:|access-date= 3040: 3027: 3016: 3012: 3006: 3003: 2998: 2993:|access-date= 2982: 2969: 2958: 2954: 2953:"indiafm.com" 2948: 2945: 2942: 2933: 2930: 2928: 2923: 2914: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2882: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2848: 2846: 2845: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2823: 2819: 2814: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2802: 2798: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2765: 2763: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2726: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2702: 2696: 2692: 2691:Take a look. 2689: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2675: 2671: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2596:editprotected 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2552: 2548: 2547:editprotected 2539: 2537: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2517: 2509: 2507: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2497:Guitaristrock 2494: 2488: 2486: 2485: 2481: 2479: 2478: 2470: 2467: 2460: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2434: 2424: 2413: 2411: 2409: 2403:4.2 Cirrhosis 2402: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2386: 2384: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2361: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2346: 2344: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2335:British India 2332: 2327: 2321: 2319: 2318: 2315: 2310: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2295: 2293: 2288:'s term ends. 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2248: 2245: 2244: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2224: 2223: 2218: 2214: 2212: 2210: 2207: 2206: 2201: 2199: 2196: 2193: 2192: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2178: 2177: 2172: 2171: 2166: 2165: 2160: 2159: 2154: 2153: 2148: 2147: 2146:Kabhie Kabhie 2142: 2141: 2136: 2135: 2130: 2129:Shashi Kapoor 2126: 2123: 2122: 2117: 2116: 2111: 2110: 2105: 2104: 2099: 2098: 2093: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2085:Mr. Natwarlal 2081: 2078: 2077: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2065: 2064:Sooryavansham 2060: 2059: 2054: 2053: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2041: 2036: 2035: 2030: 2029: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2017: 2012: 2011: 2006: 2002: 1999: 1998: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1962: 1961: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1943: 1942:Chupke Chupke 1938: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1926: 1923:(directed by 1922: 1921: 1916: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1903: 1899: 1898: 1893: 1889: 1888: 1883: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1843: 1837: 1831: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1815: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1806: 1801: 1797: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1762: 1760: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1742: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1718:Robert Mugabe 1715: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1701:User:BostonMA 1697: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1688: 1682: 1680: 1678: 1673: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1638: 1632: 1630: 1625: 1622: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1541: 1539: 1537: 1532: 1526: 1524: 1522: 1517: 1514: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1480: 1472: 1469: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1412: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399:notable event 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1390: 1385: 1383: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1364: 1362: 1360: 1355: 1352: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1323: 1315: 1313: 1311: 1306: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1283: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1269: 1264: 1259: 1251: 1249: 1247: 1242: 1235: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1221: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1179: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1158: 1157: 1154: 1146: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1130: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1104: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1084: 1082: 1081: 1078: 1069: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1024: 1022: 1020: 1016: 1007: 1005: 1002: 999: 996: 993: 989: 982: 980: 977: 974: 966: 965: 962: 958: 957:Sooryavansham 950: 948: 947: 944: 940: 935: 932: 931: 928: 922: 916:Govinda movie 915: 913: 911: 906: 900: 897: 892: 891: 890: 888: 883: 877: 875: 873: 868: 864: 863: 860: 854: 845: 843: 837: 835: 830: 826: 824: 815: 813: 811: 806: 800: 798: 796: 791: 784: 782: 779: 778: 775: 766: 764: 761: 758: 755: 749: 747: 746: 743: 739: 734: 731: 727: 725: 721: 717: 713: 708: 703: 698: 692: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 668: 667: 663: 659: 656: 652: 651: 650: 649: 646: 641: 634: 632: 631: 628: 623: 617: 615: 614: 611: 606: 604: 599: 595: 589: 586: 581: 580: 579: 578: 575: 569: 566: 562: 558: 557: 554: 548: 539: 533: 530: 526: 524: 521: 517: 516: 515: 514: 511: 503: 500: 495: 494: 493: 492: 489: 481: 479: 478: 475: 466: 464: 458: 450: 448: 447: 444: 434: 433: 432: 423: 422: 419: 408: 407: 404: 395: 393: 392: 389: 379: 376: 372: 368: 367: 366: 365: 362: 359: 355: 354: 353: 351: 343: 341: 340: 337: 333: 332:peakock terms 326: 323: 317: 316: 311: 310: 309: 307: 301: 298: 294: 292: 288: 284: 279: 276: 273: 267: 265: 264: 261: 258:the article. 252: 250: 248: 243: 236: 231: 229: 223: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 194: 191: 189: 186: 177: 175: 174: 171: 162: 160: 156: 149: 147: 141: 139: 138: 135: 127: 125: 123: 118: 116: 112: 108: 104: 100: 94: 89: 87: 79: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3343:suggested) ( 3337:|accessyear= 3325:|accessdate= 3304: 3295: 3285:suggested) ( 3279:|accessyear= 3267:|accessdate= 3246: 3237: 3227:suggested) ( 3221:|accessyear= 3209:|accessdate= 3188: 3179: 3169:suggested) ( 3163:|accessyear= 3151:|accessdate= 3130: 3127:"rediff.com" 3121: 3111:suggested) ( 3105:|accessyear= 3093:|accessdate= 3072: 3069:"rediff.com" 3063: 3053:suggested) ( 3047:|accessyear= 3035:|accessdate= 3014: 3011:"rediff.com" 3005: 2995:suggested) ( 2989:|accessyear= 2977:|accessdate= 2956: 2947: 2940: 2918: 2891: 2873: 2869: 2864: 2843: 2842: 2832: 2769: 2741:— Preceding 2727: 2723: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2709: 2706: 2703: 2700: 2693: 2690: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2660:AppleJuggler 2657: 2646:AppleJuggler 2642:www.imdb.com 2639: 2605: 2602: 2591: 2556: 2543: 2526:90.203.48.36 2513: 2492: 2476: 2475: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2449: 2417: 2406: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2365: 2350: 2328: 2325: 2311: 2303: 2299: 2291: 2241: 2220: 2203: 2189: 2183: 2174: 2170:Namak Halaal 2168: 2162: 2156: 2150: 2144: 2138: 2132: 2119: 2113: 2107: 2101: 2095: 2089: 2083: 2074: 2070:Lal Baadshah 2068: 2062: 2056: 2050: 2044: 2038: 2032: 2026: 2020: 2014: 2008: 1995: 1964: 1958: 1952: 1946: 1940: 1934: 1928: 1918: 1915:Jaya Bhaduri 1905: 1895: 1885: 1869: 1854: 1851: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1792: 1777: 1763: 1758: 1756: 1740: 1738: 1714:Edward Burns 1712:It's not Dr 1689: 1686: 1674: 1669: 1665: 1660: 1658: 1647:Mervyn Peake 1633: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1545: 1533: 1530: 1518: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1487: 1484: 1439: 1434: 1430: 1417: 1403: 1398: 1386: 1381: 1378: 1368: 1356: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1327: 1326: 1319: 1307: 1303: 1279: 1276: 1272: 1267: 1262: 1257: 1255: 1243: 1239: 1225: 1207: 1196:Bookswinters 1193: 1183: 1168: 1159: 1150: 1136: 1128: 1114: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1088: 1073: 1059: 1056: 1042: 1028: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 990: 986: 978: 975: 972: 954: 936: 933: 923: 919: 907: 903: 884: 881: 869: 865: 855: 851: 838: 831: 827: 819: 807: 804: 792: 788: 780: 770: 762: 759: 756: 753: 735: 732: 728: 709: 699: 696: 642: 638: 624: 621: 607: 602: 600: 596: 592: 570: 567: 563: 559: 549: 545: 536: 506: 485: 470: 462: 439: 429: 414: 399: 384: 347: 329: 302: 299: 295: 290: 286: 282: 280: 277: 274: 271: 256: 244: 240: 227: 209:68.150.61.36 200: 192: 181: 166: 158: 153: 145: 131: 119: 90: 83: 60: 43: 37: 2813:FisherQueen 2792:FisherQueen 2520:—Preceding 2414:Total cruft 2367:Samrat.bose 2286:Abdul Kalam 2188:in 1973 to 2034:Desh Premee 2022:Kasme Vaade 1766:Commando303 1692:Commando303 1677:Commando303 1629:Commando303 1536:Commando303 1521:Commando303 1389:Commando303 1359:Commando303 1310:Commando303 1282:Commando303 1246:Commando303 1222:he is alive 1162:Rainman0187 1111:Formal tone 1064:Commando303 910:Commando303 887:Commando303 872:Commando303 834:Commando303 810:Commando303 795:Commando303 608:Thanks! -- 344:the picture 291:was reeling 128:Movies list 103:Pinkunicorn 36:This is an 2874:implicated 2870:not guilty 2776:neutrality 2644:shall we? 2305:SilverMerc 1659:This is a 1289:magazines! 1236:Main Image 1015:vandalism, 1008:Reversions 1004:A M. Khan 742:Autumnleaf 688:puntuality 674:deeptrivia 655:Autumnleaf 585:Autumnleaf 510:Autumnleaf 488:Autumnleaf 3339:ignored ( 3281:ignored ( 3223:ignored ( 3165:ignored ( 3107:ignored ( 3049:ignored ( 2991:ignored ( 2861:IndiaInfo 2784:consensus 2607:Wikivarun 2440:Sarvagnya 2314:Shakirfan 2005:dual role 1904:7500 for 1894:7000 for 1847:cross out 1735:criticism 1722:Ken Loach 1661:Knowledge 1621:mentioned 1316:Reverting 1263:currently 1228:himangshu 1062:) fact. ( 961:Shakirfan 943:Shakirfan 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 3316:cite web 3258:cite web 3200:cite web 3142:cite web 3084:cite web 3026:cite web 2968:cite web 2822:contribs 2801:contribs 2755:contribs 2743:unsigned 2721:1989-92 2710:1969-72 2522:unsigned 2322:the flag 2194:in 1986. 2179:in 1991. 2091:Lawaaris 1930:Abhimaan 1920:Abhimaan 1907:Parwaana 1856:Achitnis 1827:Emeraude 1814:BBC News 1805:Emeraude 1726:Dmanning 1563:Dmanning 1458:Dmanning 1277:Thanks. 1214:Dmanning 1085:Pratulka 1060:verified 785:Revision 767:BBC Poll 664:Comments 436:Amitabh. 371:{{IncMan 217:contribs 205:unsigned 111:contribs 99:unsigned 2559:Anoopkn 2257:Eklavya 2236:. Host 2185:Zanjeer 2164:Silsila 2152:Trishul 2140:Deewaar 2115:Baghban 2097:Silsila 2067:, and 2010:Aadalat 1960:Silsila 1936:Zanjeer 1880:He got 1818:Ekantik 1781:Ekantik 1749:Ekantik 1705:Ekantik 1637:Ekantik 1527:ID Khan 1468:Ekantik 1444:Ekantik 1408:Ekantik 1252:Content 1172:Ekantik 823:deep750 801:Picture 704:' : --> 388:Fadereu 386:here.-- 268:cleanup 185:Fadereu 170:Fadereu 39:archive 2897:Shovon 2844:Shahid 2837:WP:3RR 2622:Stifle 2620:Done. 2574:Stifle 2477:Shahid 2362:Health 2261:turban 2176:Akayla 2121:Baabul 2109:Toofan 2076:Mahaan 2055:, , , 2052:Toofan 1954:Sholay 1864:Trivia 1720:or Dr 1683:Doctor 1452:it is 1204:Bofors 1049:Anagha 1039:Trivia 1031:Haphar 842:Dhirad 627:Yoasif 610:Yoasif 605:work. 574:Yoasif 375:talk}} 350:Yoasif 336:Yoasif 306:Yoasif 134:Sbohra 95:page. 2454:WP:RS 2390:Adejk 2331:India 2284:once 2158:Shaan 2103:Pukar 1997:Black 1897:Anand 1759:truly 1716:, Dr 1670:cited 1513:never 1382:maybe 1365:Rekha 1180:Funny 1139:D-Boy 1025:Image 774:Fkh82 720:polio 706:: --> 705:: --> 603:needs 253:Oops! 86:Rahul 16:< 3345:help 3329:help 3287:help 3271:help 3229:help 3213:help 3171:help 3155:help 3113:help 3097:help 3055:help 3039:help 2997:help 2981:help 2901:talk 2888:here 2881:this 2865:will 2859:and 2818:talk 2797:talk 2772:WP:V 2751:talk 2664:talk 2650:talk 2626:talk 2611:talk 2578:talk 2563:talk 2530:talk 2516:VJha 2501:talk 2462:not. 2450:seem 2433:fact 2423:fact 2394:talk 2167:and 2118:and 1963:and 1948:Mili 1900:and 1798:and 1651:Zora 1608:Zora 1549:Zora 1454:only 1435:only 1421:Zora 1404:only 1372:Zora 1296:Zora 1258:much 1153:Zora 1117:Zora 1103:Zora 1077:Zora 983:Zora 927:Zora 896:Zora 859:Zora 816:Name 724:AIDS 722:and 678:talk 645:Zora 553:Zora 529:Zora 520:Zora 499:Zora 474:Zora 443:Zora 418:Zora 403:Zora 358:Zora 322:Zora 260:Zora 247:Zora 213:talk 107:talk 80:2003 2857:IBN 2849:• 2790:. - 2482:• 2278:DMK 2219:'s 2205:Aks 2016:Don 1902:Rs. 1892:Rs. 1882:Rs. 1666:not 1492:Wig 1481:KBC 1440:the 1431:are 1324:): 1268:not 1019:not 740:'. 726:'. 712:ads 702:BBC 122:Jay 3333:; 3320:: 3318:}} 3314:{{ 3303:. 3275:; 3262:: 3260:}} 3256:{{ 3245:. 3217:; 3204:: 3202:}} 3198:{{ 3187:. 3159:; 3146:: 3144:}} 3140:{{ 3129:. 3101:; 3088:: 3086:}} 3082:{{ 3071:. 3043:; 3030:: 3028:}} 3024:{{ 3013:. 2985:; 2972:: 2970:}} 2966:{{ 2955:. 2903:) 2820:· 2799:· 2757:) 2753:• 2666:) 2652:) 2628:) 2613:) 2599:}} 2593:{{ 2580:) 2565:) 2557:-- 2549:}} 2545:{{ 2532:) 2503:) 2436:}} 2430:{{ 2426:}} 2420:{{ 2410:) 2396:) 2246:. 2161:, 2155:, 2149:, 2143:, 2137:, 2112:, 2106:, 2100:, 2094:, 2088:, 2061:, 2049:, 2043:, 2037:, 2031:, 2025:, 2019:, 2013:, 1957:, 1951:, 1945:, 1939:, 1890:, 1768:) 1694:) 1679:) 1631:) 1538:) 1523:) 1391:) 1361:) 1351:do 1312:) 1284:) 1248:) 1066:) 912:) 889:) 874:) 836:) 812:) 797:) 680:) 551:. 320:. 304:-- 215:• 183:-- 168:-- 113:) 109:• 3347:) 3331:) 3327:( 3310:. 3289:) 3273:) 3269:( 3252:. 3231:) 3215:) 3211:( 3194:. 3173:) 3157:) 3153:( 3136:. 3115:) 3099:) 3095:( 3078:. 3057:) 3041:) 3037:( 3020:. 2999:) 2983:) 2979:( 2962:. 2899:( 2824:) 2816:( 2803:) 2795:( 2749:( 2662:( 2648:( 2624:( 2609:( 2576:( 2561:( 2528:( 2499:( 2392:( 2124:. 2079:. 2000:. 1969:. 1910:. 1764:( 1690:( 1675:( 1627:( 1534:( 1519:( 1387:( 1357:( 1308:( 1280:( 1244:( 908:( 885:( 870:( 832:( 808:( 793:( 676:( 373:| 211:( 105:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index