Knowledge

Talk:Answers Research Journal

Source đź“ť

398: 253: 235: 334: 316: 416: 75: 21: 1638: 1661: 1620: 1589: 1565: 1538: 1524: 1495: 1477: 1463: 1449: 1410: 1376: 204: 917: 187: 128: 1264:: So besides those two examples, do you have any other concerns? I’m not seeing much instances of non-neutral language. Certainly, the reception is pretty negative but all those statements are attributed, so it complies with NPOV. Do you have objections to “not scientifically sound”; “unscientific”; “journal's objective is not scientific inquiry”? We have to remember that 816: 808: 797: 768: 760: 731: 711: 700: 671: 660: 844: 1049: 1209:
In both cases it could be argued that a source is needed for the word I have stricken out. Those were the most obvious, please go through and check, letting the sourced material tell the story -- which is clearly very strong. Please let me know when you are done
1314:
Finishing up the review as a Pass. The only slightly questionable point is 6a, images. The journal has graphic pages at the top of each article, many of which are from Wikimedia Commons so might be useable. Something to think about for later.
1190:
A basic point: I think the article is too aggressive in places and includes not-neutral words which are not needed, and might be considered as OR. A couple of examples with words that could be removed are:
594: 553: 179: 1054: 296: 32: 1695: 1720: 1354: 374: 94: 1735: 1398: 1087: 468: 1710: 1059: 1077: 380: 269: 1705: 474: 1612: 1725: 1740: 1700: 1402: 1394: 1126: 260: 240: 1715: 1455: 1386: 350: 1730: 444: 175: 46: 1630: 1344: 1176:, thank you very much for taking up this review. If you have feedback for me, I most likely won’t be able to respond until July 8th. 1105: 341: 321: 53: 1690: 1626: 1441: 1390: 423: 403: 1551: 1350: 1082: 38: 1469: 717: 1033:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1677:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1148: 1305: 1273: 1251: 1229: 1181: 1120: 993: 906: 725: 627: 613: 215: 113: 82: 514: 443:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
109: 1382: 970: 860: 694: 578: 159: 1427: 1301: 1269: 1247: 1225: 1177: 1116: 989: 939: 902: 876: 623: 609: 1530: 1516: 1244:” For example, in its “research journal” is this flat statement: .Simple, eh? Completely wrong, but simple 1101: 802: 754: 665: 654: 101: 112:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
20: 1239: 927: 886: 221: 143: 1487: 1483: 721: 1157:
I can review this. Initial indications are that it meets GA, but I will do more analysis this week.
585: 105: 349:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
268:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
127: 1320: 1287: 1215: 1162: 1142: 1017: 42: 1602: 1265: 949: 921: 898: 880: 415: 397: 265: 1432: 791: 252: 234: 705: 534: 90: 333: 315: 1684: 848: 436: 432: 86: 1324: 1309: 1291: 1277: 1255: 1233: 1219: 1185: 1166: 1152: 1130: 1021: 997: 953: 933: 910: 892: 631: 537: 499:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
74: 1316: 1297: 1283: 1261: 1211: 1173: 1158: 1138: 1013: 148: 979: 943: 869: 573: 346: 168: 916: 505:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1224:
Yeah I’m not the one who added “spuriously” and I agree it should be removed.
843: 602:: If preferred, the 'according to the journal' clause can be in the beginning. 440: 531: 138: 1108:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 851:
territory, it might be best to err on the side of being a bit verbose.
428: 517:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 784:
Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
595:
Template:Did_you_know_nominations/George_Kunkel_(theatre_manager)
975: 865: 569: 197: 164: 122: 69: 15: 687:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
185: 988:
I prefer the Alt1 hook still. Alt2 just seems a bit wordy.
1238:
But I believe “incorrectly” is not OR. We always describe
180:
Template:Did you know nominations/Answers Research Journal
100:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
85:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
558: 549: 59: 938:
Can I offer an even more direct alternative hook? And
178:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at 1242:
in such terms. The cited source verifies it as well:
777: 740: 680: 640: 847:
LGTM, tho I don't love the hook. Given that this is
427:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 345:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 264:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 747:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation 1282:I will go over it carefully tomorrow (or Monday). 473:This article has not yet received a rating on the 379:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1606:and other media, where possible and appropriate. 942:, if you're not feeling this, you can strike it. 45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 1611:(images are tagged and non-free content have 8: 519:No further edits should be made to this page 297:WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide 1037: 392: 310: 229: 1696:Social sciences and society good articles 151:). The text of the entry was as follows: 33:Social sciences and society good articles 301:for tips on how to improve this article. 1721:Unknown-importance Creationism articles 1068: 1040: 394: 312: 278:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals 231: 1736:Unknown-importance Skepticism articles 1300:. Have you had a chance to review it? 1243: 647:Article is new enough and long enough 281:Template:WikiProject Academic Journals 1711:WikiProject Academic Journal articles 174:A record of the entry may be seen at 7: 1029:The following discussion is closed. 968:: ... that the inaugural article of 620:. Nominator has 11 past nominations. 421:This article is within the scope of 339:This article is within the scope of 258:This article is within the scope of 203: 201: 176:Knowledge:Recent additions/2024/June 220:It is of interest to the following 1706:GA-Class Academic Journal articles 14: 1106:Talk:Answers Research Journal/GA1 359:Knowledge:WikiProject Creationism 186: 41:. If you can improve it further, 1726:WikiProject Creationism articles 1673:The discussion above is closed. 1659: 1636: 1618: 1587: 1563: 1560:Fair representation without bias 1536: 1522: 1493: 1475: 1461: 1447: 1408: 1374: 915: 842: 814: 806: 795: 766: 758: 729: 709: 698: 669: 658: 453:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism 414: 396: 362:Template:WikiProject Creationism 332: 314: 251: 233: 202: 126: 73: 19: 1741:WikiProject Skepticism articles 1701:Knowledge Did you know articles 502:Please do not modify this page. 456:Template:WikiProject Skepticism 1371:(prose, spelling, and grammar) 1351:here for what the criteria are 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 1716:GA-Class Creationism articles 447:and see a list of open tasks. 353:and see a list of open tasks. 272:and see a list of open tasks. 261:WikiProject Academic Journals 114:contentious topics procedures 1731:GA-Class Skepticism articles 1660: 1637: 1619: 1588: 1564: 1537: 1523: 1494: 1476: 1462: 1448: 1409: 1375: 616:). Number of QPQs required: 825: 515:Knowledge talk:Did you know 507:this nomination's talk page 1757: 1355:here for what they are not 475:project's importance scale 381:project's importance scale 1325:21:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 1310:07:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 1167:14:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 1153:14:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 1022:21:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC) 998:19:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 954:19:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC) 901:, Alt1 looks good to me! 538:17:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC) 472: 409: 378: 327: 292: 284:Academic Journal articles 246: 228: 116:before editing this page. 1675:Please do not modify it. 1292:20:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1278:20:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1256:20:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1240:climate change denialism 1234:20:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1220:11:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 1186:16:50, 4 July 2024 (UTC) 1131:19:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 1031:Please do not modify it. 934:00:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC) 911:23:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 893:21:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 858:: ... that according to 632:22:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC) 147:column on 23 June 2024 ( 137:appeared on Knowledge's 135:Answers Research Journal 110:normal editorial process 27:Answers Research Journal 1691:Knowledge good articles 1613:non-free use rationales 1364:reasonably well written 971:one creationist journal 868:has its origins in the 861:one creationist journal 572:has its origins in the 511:the article's talk page 492:Did you know nomination 342:WikiProject Creationism 167:has its origins in the 160:one creationist journal 97:as a contentious topic. 1268:comes into play here. 424:WikiProject Skepticism 210:This article is rated 191: 157:... that according to 106:standards of behaviour 1600:It is illustrated by 1552:neutral point of view 1508:broad in its coverage 1454:(inline citations to 920:Approved, per above. 189: 39:good article criteria 718:copyright violations 365:Creationism articles 102:purpose of Knowledge 459:Skepticism articles 1584:No edit wars, etc. 1423:factually accurate 1117:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d 1032: 940:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d 877:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d 726:close paraphrasing 610:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d 216:content assessment 192: 83:contentious topics 57:: July 12, 2024. ( 1631:suitable captions 1442:reference section 1433:source spot-check 1096: 1095: 1030: 978:goes back to the 836: 835: 824: 823: 776: 775: 739: 738: 695:Adequate sourcing 679: 678: 587: 489: 488: 485: 484: 481: 480: 391: 390: 387: 386: 309: 308: 305: 304: 275:Academic Journals 266:Academic Journals 241:Academic Journals 196: 195: 121: 120: 93:, which has been 68: 67: 64: 1748: 1663: 1662: 1640: 1639: 1622: 1621: 1591: 1590: 1567: 1566: 1540: 1539: 1526: 1525: 1497: 1496: 1479: 1478: 1465: 1464: 1456:reliable sources 1451: 1450: 1431:, as shown by a 1412: 1411: 1378: 1377: 1050:Copyvio detector 1038: 946: 930: 919: 889: 846: 826: 818: 817: 813:Clear at 100px: 810: 809: 799: 798: 778: 770: 769: 762: 761: 741: 733: 732: 713: 712: 702: 701: 681: 673: 672: 662: 661: 641: 583: 526:The result was: 504: 461: 460: 457: 454: 451: 418: 411: 410: 400: 393: 367: 366: 363: 360: 357: 336: 329: 328: 318: 311: 286: 285: 282: 279: 276: 255: 248: 247: 237: 230: 213: 207: 206: 205: 198: 188: 130: 123: 77: 70: 62: 60:Reviewed version 51: 23: 16: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1627:appropriate use 1549:It follows the 1194:A 2009 article 1100:This review is 1092: 1064: 1035: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1007: 1002: 983: 944: 928: 887: 815: 807: 803:Used in article 796: 792:Freely licensed 767: 759: 730: 710: 699: 670: 659: 621: 576:, according to 565: 563: 559:Article history 500: 494: 458: 455: 452: 449: 448: 364: 361: 358: 355: 354: 283: 280: 277: 274: 273: 214:on Knowledge's 211: 104:, any expected 58: 12: 11: 5: 1754: 1752: 1744: 1743: 1738: 1733: 1728: 1723: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1683: 1682: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1359: 1358: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1199: 1111: 1110: 1094: 1093: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1063: 1062: 1060:External links 1057: 1052: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1036: 1027: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 1000: 985: 984: 964: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 834: 833: 822: 821: 820: 819: 811: 800: 786: 785: 774: 773: 772: 771: 763: 749: 748: 737: 736: 735: 734: 714: 703: 689: 688: 677: 676: 675: 674: 663: 649: 648: 639: 638: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 597: 562: 561: 556: 546: 544: 540: 524: 523: 495: 493: 490: 487: 486: 483: 482: 479: 478: 471: 465: 464: 462: 445:the discussion 419: 407: 406: 401: 389: 388: 385: 384: 377: 371: 370: 368: 351:the discussion 337: 325: 324: 319: 307: 306: 303: 302: 290: 289: 287: 270:the discussion 256: 244: 243: 238: 226: 225: 219: 208: 194: 193: 183: 173: 172: 131: 119: 118: 91:fringe science 78: 66: 65: 50: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1753: 1742: 1739: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1724: 1722: 1719: 1717: 1714: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1686: 1676: 1665: 1664: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1642: 1641: 1634: 1632: 1628: 1616: 1614: 1608: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1579: 1575: 1569: 1568: 1561: 1558: 1557: 1555: 1553: 1548: 1542: 1541: 1534: 1532: 1520: 1518: 1517:major aspects 1512: 1511: 1509: 1505: 1499: 1498: 1491: 1489: 1485: 1473: 1471: 1459: 1457: 1445: 1443: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1424: 1420: 1414: 1413: 1406: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1346: 1342: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1302:Dr. Swag Lord 1299: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270:Dr. Swag Lord 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1248:Dr. Swag Lord 1245: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226:Dr. Swag Lord 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178:Dr. Swag Lord 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1098: 1097: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1047: 1045: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1004: 999: 995: 991: 990:Dr. Swag Lord 987: 986: 981: 980:biblical Fall 977: 973: 972: 967: 963: 962: 955: 951: 947: 941: 937: 936: 935: 931: 925: 924: 918: 914: 913: 912: 908: 904: 903:Dr. Swag Lord 900: 897: 896: 895: 894: 890: 884: 883: 878: 873: 871: 867: 863: 862: 857: 852: 850: 849:Psuedoscience 845: 840: 831: 828: 827: 812: 804: 801: 793: 790: 789: 788: 787: 783: 780: 779: 765:Interesting: 764: 756: 753: 752: 751: 750: 746: 743: 742: 727: 723: 719: 715: 707: 704: 696: 693: 692: 691: 690: 686: 683: 682: 667: 664: 656: 653: 652: 651: 650: 646: 643: 642: 637: 636: 635: 633: 629: 625: 624:Dr. Swag Lord 619: 615: 611: 601: 598: 596: 592: 589: 588: 586: 581: 580: 575: 571: 567: 566: 560: 557: 555: 551: 548: 547: 543: 541: 539: 536: 533: 529: 522: 520: 516: 512: 508: 503: 497: 496: 491: 476: 470: 467: 466: 463: 446: 442: 438: 437:pseudohistory 434: 433:pseudoscience 430: 426: 425: 420: 417: 413: 412: 408: 405: 402: 399: 395: 382: 376: 373: 372: 369: 352: 348: 344: 343: 338: 335: 331: 330: 326: 323: 320: 317: 313: 300: 299: 298: 291: 288: 271: 267: 263: 262: 257: 254: 250: 249: 245: 242: 239: 236: 232: 227: 223: 217: 209: 200: 199: 184: 181: 177: 170: 166: 162: 161: 156: 153: 152: 150: 146: 145: 140: 136: 132: 129: 125: 124: 117: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 96: 92: 88: 87:pseudoscience 84: 79: 76: 72: 71: 61: 56: 55: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1674: 1655: 1649: 1624: 1610: 1601: 1583: 1577: 1559: 1550: 1528: 1514: 1507: 1481: 1467: 1453: 1439: 1426: 1422: 1380: 1370: 1363: 1343: 1202: 1201:His thesis, 1195: 1156: 1145: 1135: 1134: 1123: 1113: 1112: 1099: 1088:Instructions 1028: 974:claims that 969: 965: 922: 881: 874: 859: 855: 853: 838: 837: 829: 781: 744: 684: 644: 622: 617: 599: 590: 577: 542: 527: 525: 518: 510: 506: 501: 498: 422: 340: 295: 294: 259: 222:WikiProjects 158: 155:Did you know 154: 144:Did you know 142: 134: 133:A fact from 99: 80: 52: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 1395:word choice 1203:incorrectly 1102:transcluded 899:Sohom Datta 666:Long enough 608:Created by 579:one journal 356:Creationism 347:Creationism 322:Creationism 149:check views 1685:Categories 1488:plagiarism 1428:verifiable 1196:spuriously 1114:Nominator: 1055:Authorship 1041:GA toolbox 854:How about 722:plagiarism 655:New enough 450:Skepticism 441:skepticism 404:Skepticism 95:designated 37:under the 1656:Pass/Fail 1266:WP:FRINGE 1136:Reviewer: 1078:Templates 1069:Reviewing 1005:GA Review 875:Thoughts 568:... that 190:Knowledge 139:Main Page 108:, or any 1198:proposes 1149:contribs 1127:contribs 1083:Criteria 1012:Passed. 832:: Done. 716:Free of 645:General: 591:Reviewed 584:Source: 528:promoted 212:GA-class 47:reassess 1650:Overall 1531:focused 1484:copyvio 1399:fiction 1317:Ldm1954 1298:Ldm1954 1284:Ldm1954 1262:Ldm1954 1212:Ldm1954 1174:Ldm1954 1159:Ldm1954 1139:Ldm1954 1014:Ldm1954 839:Overall 706:Neutral 685:Policy: 600:Comment 550:Comment 429:science 141:in the 1603:images 1578:stable 1576:It is 1554:policy 1506:It is 1421:It is 1401:, and 1391:layout 1362:It is 1353:, and 1347:review 782:Image: 724:, and 218:scale. 54:Review 1629:with 1403:lists 1349:(see 1104:from 923:Sohom 882:Sohom 856:ALT 1 755:Cited 745:Hook: 1486:and 1425:and 1387:lead 1385:for 1321:talk 1306:talk 1296:Hi @ 1288:talk 1274:talk 1252:talk 1230:talk 1216:talk 1182:talk 1163:talk 1143:talk 1121:talk 1018:talk 994:talk 966:ALT2 950:talk 929:talk 907:talk 888:talk 870:Fall 628:talk 614:talk 574:Fall 554:view 535:talk 532:SL93 439:and 293:See 169:Fall 89:and 81:The 1383:MoS 976:HIV 945:Rjj 866:HIV 830:QPQ 570:HIV 552:or 530:by 513:or 469:??? 375:??? 165:HIV 49:it. 1687:: 1658:: 1652:: 1635:: 1623:b 1617:: 1609:a 1586:: 1580:. 1562:: 1556:. 1535:: 1527:b 1521:: 1513:a 1510:. 1492:: 1480:d 1474:: 1470:OR 1466:c 1460:: 1452:b 1446:: 1438:a 1435:. 1407:: 1397:, 1393:, 1389:, 1379:b 1373:: 1369:a 1366:. 1345:GA 1323:) 1308:) 1290:) 1276:) 1254:) 1246:. 1232:) 1218:) 1184:) 1165:) 1151:) 1129:) 1020:) 996:) 952:) 932:) 909:) 891:) 879:? 872:? 864:, 841:: 805:: 794:: 757:: 728:: 720:, 708:: 697:: 668:: 657:: 634:. 630:) 593:: 582:? 545:( 509:, 435:, 431:, 163:, 63:). 1633:) 1625:( 1615:) 1533:) 1529:( 1519:) 1515:( 1490:) 1482:( 1472:) 1468:( 1458:) 1444:) 1440:( 1405:) 1381:( 1357:) 1319:( 1304:( 1286:( 1272:( 1260:@ 1250:( 1228:( 1214:( 1180:( 1172:@ 1161:( 1146:· 1141:( 1124:· 1119:( 1016:( 992:( 982:? 948:( 926:( 905:( 885:( 626:( 618:1 612:( 564:) 521:. 477:. 383:. 224:: 182:. 171:?

Index

Good articles
Social sciences and society good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
Review
Reviewed version

contentious topics
pseudoscience
fringe science
designated
purpose of Knowledge
standards of behaviour
normal editorial process
contentious topics procedures

Main Page
Did you know
check views
one creationist journal
HIV
Fall
Knowledge:Recent additions/2024/June
Template:Did you know nominations/Answers Research Journal
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Academic Journals
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑