1026:'s "Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science" (ISBN 978-0-415-94293-5) and Biagioli, Mario, Peter Jaszi, and Martha Woodmanse's "Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective" (ISBN 9780226907093), from the History of Science's point of view and a whole lot of literature in LIS (for example Adèle Paul-Hus, Nadine Desrochers, Sarah de Rijcke, Alexander D. Rushforth, (2017) "The reward system of science", Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 69 Issue: 5, pp.478-485) for a review that traces back to
333:
315:
571:
necessarily general to all academics. Regarding whether this topic is large enough to stand alone, I believe it is. I think it is already at the level of detail that if it were a section in another article, someone would suggest summarizing and moving the detail to a separate article. I'd prefer to give this article a chance; we could re-evaluate its state after a couple months and see if it is progressing towards becoming a good stand-alone article.
178:
227:
206:
1010:
ones, as they are, in their majority, relevant to guidelines or policies of said journals and not a secondary analysis of the concept of academic authorship. As a matter of fact, I do believe that this article is very important because academi authorship is a very different concept from authorship in the litterary or publishing world. I also believe that the main relevant (secondary) litterature is to be found in
414:
396:
531:
480:
22:
237:
80:
53:
959:
90:
1046:
hybrid of a journal and a magazine. A good number of the citations that look like research articles are in fact from the news, commentary, feature, or letters sections. The news items in particular are no different from a item in a newspaper, written by a reporter about scholarly work someone else did - very much a secondary source.
1009:
Hello fellow
Wikipedians (especially those watchlisting this article), Ater having read the article, I paradoxically believe that, although the references are numerous, diversified and come from peer reviewed academic journals, they arguably constitue a corpus of primary sources rather than secondary
598:
and re-focusing it on scientific publication. I don't think there's any reason to pretend that this discussion applies across all disciplines, and most of these issues simply don't occur outside of the scientific disciplines in which multiple coauthorship is common. (It's still fine with me to wait
627:
Obviously my own experience is not universal, and when I have a moment I'll look for sources on the topic, but to my knowledge in many/most humanities fields co-authorship (a) is relatively uncommon and (b) basically always means that both authors (there are almost always only two) had a significant
570:
I understand your concerns. Regarding the scope of the article, my personal knowledge limits what I can write about; there is no reason to think that the coverage won't be broaded by future contributors. I will attempt to shape the article so that it is clearer that what is currently written is not
580:
You're right, it's probably a good idea to leave the article here for a while and see if it grows. I am pretty sure that it will remain skewed toward scientific publication, simply because there's much more to say on the topic of authorship in fields where multiple coauthors are common. In most
1045:
I think it is important to notice that many of the items in the reference list that may at appear to be journal articles, clearly are not if you click through and have a look. While most scholarly journals are nothing but peer reviewed research, publications like Nature and
Science are really a
547:
This is good material, but I'm not sure this is the best place for it, and thought some discussion might help. Two concerns: first, in its current state this article seems to deal entirely with scientific publishing and has nothing to say about "academic" authorship more broadly. And second,
1066:"In computer science in general the principal contributor is the first in the author list. However, the practice of putting the principal investigator last in the author list has increasingly become an accepted standard across most areas in science and engineering."
728:
Well, I know that in genome sequencing papers, the first one or two authors will be the principle investigators, the last usually the head of the department, and the authors in between are mostly laboratory technicians. I doubt there is an order in all those.
581:
humanities fields and some social sciences, single authors on articles and books are the norm (and authorship simply means direct involvement in writing the piece), making most of the questions described in the article much simpler. --
1069:
This phrase seems to confuse principal contributor with principal investigator (not the same thing). Should be clarified to say what is now accepted in cases where the PI *is* the principal contributor, do they go first or last?
706:
718:
Holy crap! I wouldn't have believed it until I saw it myself. Do you think that in this sort of paper there is a lot of significance attached to one's position on the list? Is eight author much more important than 50th?
628:
part in both the research and the writing of the piece. A more common form of collaboration is contribution to, or editing of, an anthology or collection on a shared topic, with each piece individually authored. --
831:
Although the article was tagged for merging, there was no discussion yet. I have removed the tag and redirected "Honorary
Authorship" here, since all info in that article was already present here, too.
809:
From reading through a little of what you linked to above, it became apparent to me that our article lacks any discussion of plagarism, which of course, is a concept closely linked to authorship.
686:
I'd be interested to see a source (or examples) listed for the claim that "In genome sequencing and particle-physics collaborations, for example, a paper's author list can run into the hundreds."
1096:
1272:'A new type of misconduct in the field of the physical sciences: The case of the pseudonyms used by I. Ciufolini to anonymously criticize other people's works on arXiv' by L. Iorio".
376:
442:
738:
With these, it's usually some principals at the head and tail of the list. Then the "workers" are ordered first by institution, then alphabetical within the institution.
1030:'s system of ethos and reward. I can assign myself the task if it reaches consensus, and in the meantime, I would suggest to add a "secondary sources needed" template.
111:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1379:
1487:
1477:
1089:
In large, multi-center clinical trials authorship is often used as a reward for recruiting patients - citation number 17 does not say anything of the sort.
349:
1437:
438:
148:
138:
1482:
1472:
1462:
297:
287:
1492:
1467:
1447:
340:
320:
185:
63:
851:
The section on Order of
Authors in a List copies word for word from the Nature paper cited. Despite the citation, this constitutes plagiarism.
421:
401:
1404:
113:
1432:
523:
263:
1457:
1452:
1071:
1100:
867:
1442:
103:
58:
1220:
The feud between Iorio and
Ciufolini is so toxic and completely unlike anything else that it represents nothing normal. And per
1015:
250:
211:
1234:
784:
33:
1035:
1018:
ones. They are the schoalrs specialized in assessing what the concept is. In a nutshell, I would suggest to consider
1224:, we shouldn't be given these two any sort of spotlight. The discussion on pseudonyms should be much more general.
1350:
743:
1075:
914:
781:
863:
1208:
1179:
1159:
1031:
662:
618:
How about fields such as history? In an original research article, is it common to have multiple authors?
690:
262:
topics on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
991:
971:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
888:
730:
710:
595:
553:
495:
39:
913:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
859:
1139:
949:
855:
1019:
21:
906:
739:
687:
549:
507:
556:? Is there really enough of a separate topic here for this to stand on its own as an article? --
348:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1328:
1320:
1299:
1281:
1230:
1011:
259:
594:
After thinking about this a bit more, I'm inclined to favor (eventually) moving this article to
479:
1195:
has reinstated my removal, so that's where things will sit unless there is further discussion.
1138:
I can't see how this situation is significant enough to warrant inclusion in this article. But
972:
1196:
1167:
1147:
1119:
1051:
814:
800:
654:
633:
608:
586:
561:
512:
95:
1400:
1375:
1309:
1291:
1242:
1027:
987:
884:
837:
773:
768:
516:
426:
345:
242:
1095:. st/10.1126/science.7701334 - link to the citation, since the article is behind a paywall
979:
650:
332:
314:
1238:
928:
922:
777:
978:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
177:
1426:
1226:
1221:
1192:
1143:
1131:
1023:
1380:"Journal retracts letter accusing physicist of using fake names to criticize papers"
1302:
1047:
810:
796:
720:
697:
672:
629:
619:
604:
582:
572:
557:
833:
766:
This article completely lacks any discussion of priority disputes in math, e.g.
226:
205:
1146:) reverted my edit removing it and asked to discuss on talk, so let's discuss.
1247:
1215:
1186:
1104:
1079:
1055:
1039:
999:
892:
871:
841:
818:
804:
789:
747:
733:
723:
713:
700:
675:
665:
636:
622:
611:
589:
575:
564:
430:
232:
108:
85:
490:
413:
395:
255:
649:
If you want to inject some relevant humor into the article, I suggest this
1317:. If this is an intentional citation to a retracted paper, please replace
236:
599:
a few weeks/months before making the move, but I don't think the article
1405:"Retraction of letter alleging sock puppetry now cites "legal reasons""
1122:
is accused of publishing two papers on the scientific preprint archive
1118:
In the field of physics, one case of usage of pseudonyms is denounced.
434:
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
1313:
1295:
966:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
1127:
603:
be expanded to cover the humanities in a way that makes sense.) --
79:
52:
1286:
1123:
1274:
Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology
474:
15:
499:
column on 7 July 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
934:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
529:
176:
917:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1126:
under pseudonyms, each criticizing one of the rivals to
696:
I'm pretty sure I got that from the van Loon reference.
437:
on
Knowledge. Please visit the project page to join the
910:
883:
Please add a section on statistical authorship model.
1134:. Such conduct is a violation of arXiv terms of use.
847:
Article copies directly from source (i.e. plagiarism)
929:
http://epac.web.cern.ch/EPAC/sitges/abstr/abstr.html
923:
http://epac.web.cern.ch/EPAC/sitges/abstr/abstr.html
425:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
344:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
254:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
159:
1092:
548:perhaps this would work better as a section of
1344:
1342:
8:
774:Grigori Perelman#Withdrawal from mathematics
519:is sometimes claimed by over 100 scientists?
377:WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide
1351:"Science Pseudonyms vs Science Sockpuppets"
390:
309:
200:
156:
47:
1285:
905:I have just modified 2 external links on
709:(Note: pseudo-randomly selected author)
681:
671:Sweet, but of course, it's copyrighted.
511:of a research article in fields such as
381:for tips on how to improve this article.
1260:
392:
358:Knowledge:WikiProject Academic Journals
311:
202:
49:
19:
1097:2405:201:5008:9076:DF97:9EEA:EA40:6460
682:Source for 'hundreds of authors' claim
451:Knowledge:WikiProject Higher education
361:Template:WikiProject Academic Journals
117:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
1488:WikiProject Higher education articles
1478:WikiProject Academic Journal articles
946:to let others know (documentation at
522:A record of the entry may be seen at
454:Template:WikiProject Higher education
7:
1114:This article contains the paragraph
524:Knowledge:Recent additions/2007/July
419:This article is within the scope of
338:This article is within the scope of
248:This article is within the scope of
101:This article is within the scope of
778:Yau's criticism of Chinese academia
38:It is of interest to the following
1438:Low-importance Philosophy articles
14:
1483:B-Class Higher education articles
1473:B-Class Academic Journal articles
1463:Low-importance education articles
1130:, what is argued to be a form of
909:. Please take a moment to review
530:
957:
478:
412:
394:
331:
313:
235:
225:
204:
123:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
88:
78:
51:
20:
1493:Knowledge Did you know articles
1016:Library and Information Science
927:Corrected formatting/usage for
921:Corrected formatting/usage for
292:This article has been rated as
272:Knowledge:WikiProject Education
143:This article has been rated as
126:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
1468:WikiProject Education articles
1448:Low-importance ethics articles
748:15:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
734:16:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
275:Template:WikiProject Education
1:
1080:11:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
1040:21:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
819:18:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
805:18:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
790:10:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
780:for more anecdotal evidence.
352:and see a list of open tasks.
341:WikiProject Academic Journals
266:and see a list of open tasks.
1056:21:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
1005:The issue of primary sources
879:Statistical Authorship Model
842:18:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
645:Possible light-hearted image
422:WikiProject Higher education
1433:B-Class Philosophy articles
1014:journals (or books) and in
724:20:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
714:11:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
1509:
1458:B-Class education articles
1453:Ethics task force articles
1166:12:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
902:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
893:03:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
298:project's importance scale
149:project's importance scale
1248:15:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1216:13:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1187:12:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
1105:16:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
872:21:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
457:Higher education articles
407:
372:
364:Academic Journal articles
326:
291:
220:
184:
155:
142:
73:
46:
1000:09:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
701:01:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
691:22:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
676:20:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
666:16:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
637:20:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
623:19:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
612:19:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
590:14:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
576:13:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
565:18:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
489:appeared on Knowledge's
441:, and see the project's
1443:B-Class ethics articles
898:External links modified
707:selected PubMed example
160:Associated task forces:
1331:|...|intentional=yes}}
1136:
795:Thanks for the leads.
535:
181:
104:WikiProject Philosophy
28:This article is rated
1116:
705:A practical example:
596:scientific authorship
554:scientific publishing
533:
251:WikiProject Education
180:
1142:(in accordance with
1268:Iorio, L. (2014). "
938:parameter below to
907:Academic authorship
550:academic publishing
487:Academic authorship
129:Philosophy articles
1085:Incorrect citation
1012:History of Science
536:
445:for useful advice.
278:education articles
182:
114:general discussion
34:content assessment
1355:Discover Magazine
1314:10.1002/asi.23238
1296:10.1002/asi.23238
1214:
1185:
1165:
1120:Ignazio Ciufolini
1032:Alexandre Hocquet
998:
875:
858:comment added by
787:
540:
539:
513:genome sequencing
473:
472:
469:
468:
465:
464:
443:article guideline
389:
388:
385:
384:
355:Academic Journals
346:Academic Journals
321:Academic Journals
308:
307:
304:
303:
260:education-related
199:
198:
195:
194:
191:
190:
96:Philosophy portal
1500:
1416:
1415:
1413:
1411:
1403:(16 June 2014).
1401:Retraction Watch
1397:
1391:
1390:
1388:
1386:
1376:Retraction Watch
1372:
1366:
1365:
1363:
1361:
1346:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1332:
1324:
1308:(Retracted, see
1306:
1289:
1265:
1246:
1207:
1178:
1158:
1028:Robert K. Merton
994:
993:Talk to my owner
989:
964:
961:
960:
953:
874:
852:
827:Merge discussion
785:
769:Manifold Destiny
660:
532:
517:particle physics
482:
475:
459:
458:
455:
452:
449:
448:Higher education
427:higher education
416:
409:
408:
402:Higher education
398:
391:
366:
365:
362:
359:
356:
335:
328:
327:
317:
310:
280:
279:
276:
273:
270:
245:
243:Education portal
240:
239:
229:
222:
221:
216:
208:
201:
167:
157:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1508:
1507:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1409:
1407:
1399:
1398:
1394:
1384:
1382:
1378:(3 June 2014).
1374:
1373:
1369:
1359:
1357:
1348:
1347:
1340:
1326:
1318:
1316:
1307:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1225:
1112:
1110:Physics example
1093:https://sci-hub
1087:
1064:
1007:
997:
992:
962:
958:
947:
915:this simple FaQ
900:
881:
853:
849:
829:
764:
684:
658:
657:
647:
545:
456:
453:
450:
447:
446:
363:
360:
357:
354:
353:
277:
274:
271:
268:
267:
241:
234:
214:
165:
128:
125:
122:
119:
118:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1506:
1504:
1496:
1495:
1490:
1485:
1480:
1475:
1470:
1465:
1460:
1455:
1450:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1425:
1424:
1418:
1417:
1392:
1367:
1349:Neuroskeptic.
1338:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1111:
1108:
1086:
1083:
1063:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1020:Mario Biagioli
1006:
1003:
990:
984:
983:
976:
932:
931:
925:
899:
896:
880:
877:
848:
845:
828:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
763:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
740:Originalname37
683:
680:
679:
678:
655:
646:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
616:
615:
614:
592:
544:
541:
538:
537:
527:
521:
520:
483:
471:
470:
467:
466:
463:
462:
460:
417:
405:
404:
399:
387:
386:
383:
382:
370:
369:
367:
350:the discussion
336:
324:
323:
318:
306:
305:
302:
301:
294:Low-importance
290:
284:
283:
281:
264:the discussion
247:
246:
230:
218:
217:
215:Low‑importance
209:
197:
196:
193:
192:
189:
188:
183:
173:
172:
170:
168:
162:
161:
153:
152:
145:Low-importance
141:
135:
134:
132:
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1505:
1494:
1491:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1479:
1476:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1466:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1451:
1449:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1428:
1406:
1402:
1396:
1393:
1381:
1377:
1371:
1368:
1356:
1352:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1330:
1322:
1315:
1311:
1304:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1264:
1261:
1257:
1249:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1223:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1211:
1205:
1203:
1199:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1182:
1176:
1174:
1170:
1164:
1162:
1156:
1154:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1135:
1133:
1132:ventriloquism
1129:
1125:
1121:
1115:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:80.189.45.169
1067:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:Peter Galison
1021:
1017:
1013:
1004:
1002:
1001:
995:
988:
981:
977:
974:
970:
969:
968:
967:
955:
951:
945:
941:
937:
930:
926:
924:
920:
919:
918:
916:
912:
908:
903:
897:
895:
894:
890:
886:
878:
876:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
846:
844:
843:
839:
835:
826:
820:
816:
812:
808:
807:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
792:
791:
788:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
761:
749:
745:
741:
737:
736:
735:
732:
731:217.122.83.79
727:
726:
725:
722:
717:
716:
715:
712:
711:217.122.83.79
708:
704:
703:
702:
699:
695:
694:
693:
692:
689:
677:
674:
670:
669:
668:
667:
664:
661:
652:
644:
638:
635:
631:
626:
625:
624:
621:
617:
613:
610:
606:
602:
597:
593:
591:
588:
584:
579:
578:
577:
574:
569:
568:
567:
566:
563:
559:
555:
551:
542:
528:
525:
518:
514:
510:
509:
504:
501:
500:
498:
497:
492:
488:
484:
481:
477:
476:
461:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
418:
415:
411:
410:
406:
403:
400:
397:
393:
380:
379:
378:
371:
368:
351:
347:
343:
342:
337:
334:
330:
329:
325:
322:
319:
316:
312:
299:
295:
289:
286:
285:
282:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
244:
238:
233:
231:
228:
224:
223:
219:
213:
210:
207:
203:
187:
179:
175:
174:
171:
169:
164:
163:
158:
154:
150:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1408:. Retrieved
1395:
1383:. Retrieved
1370:
1358:. Retrieved
1354:
1280:(11): 2375.
1277:
1273:
1269:
1263:
1255:
1209:
1201:
1197:
1180:
1172:
1168:
1160:
1152:
1148:
1137:
1117:
1113:
1091:
1088:
1068:
1065:
1008:
985:
965:
956:
943:
939:
935:
933:
904:
901:
882:
854:— Preceding
850:
830:
767:
765:
685:
648:
600:
546:
506:
503:Did you know
502:
496:Did you know
494:
486:
485:A fact from
431:universities
420:
375:
374:
339:
293:
249:
144:
112:
102:
40:WikiProjects
1270:Withdrawal:
950:Sourcecheck
885:Aravind V R
860:Chickadee84
772:; see also
762:Mathematics
1427:Categories
1360:12 January
1256:References
1140:Geysirhead
508:authorship
439:discussion
120:Philosophy
109:philosophy
59:Philosophy
1329:retracted
1321:retracted
1287:1407.2137
1124:arXiv.org
1062:Ambiguity
980:this tool
973:this tool
534:Knowledge
505:... that
491:Main Page
269:Education
256:education
212:Education
1303:62597108
1227:Headbomb
1193:Headbomb
986:Cheers.—
868:contribs
856:unsigned
688:Orthabok
543:Untitled
435:colleges
1048:Ike9898
996::Online
936:checked
911:my edit
811:ike9898
797:ike9898
721:ike9898
698:ike9898
673:ike9898
630:Rbellin
620:ike9898
605:Rbellin
583:Rbellin
573:ike9898
558:Rbellin
493:in the
296:on the
147:on the
30:B-class
1410:24 May
1385:24 May
1323:|...}}
1222:WP:DUE
1200:apital
1171:apital
1151:apital
1144:WP:BRD
1128:LAGEOS
944:failed
834:Crusio
433:, and
186:Ethics
64:Ethics
36:scale.
1325:with
1300:S2CID
1282:arXiv
659:izard
651:comic
1412:2019
1387:2019
1362:2020
1204:asha
1175:asha
1155:asha
1101:talk
1076:talk
1052:talk
1036:talk
1022:and
940:true
889:talk
864:talk
838:talk
815:talk
801:talk
786:ping
782:Pcap
776:and
744:talk
634:Talk
609:Talk
587:Talk
562:Talk
515:and
373:See
258:and
1310:doi
1292:doi
1212:alk
1183:alk
1163:alk
954:).
942:or
601:can
552:or
288:Low
139:Low
1429::
1353:.
1341:^
1327:{{
1319:{{
1298:.
1290:.
1278:65
1276:.
1241:·
1237:·
1233:·
1206:~
1177:~
1157:~
1103:)
1078:)
1054:)
1038:)
952:}}
948:{{
891:)
870:)
866:•
840:)
832:--
817:)
803:)
746:)
653:.
429:,
166:/
62::
1414:.
1389:.
1364:.
1335:)
1333:.
1312::
1305:.
1294::
1284::
1245:}
1243:b
1239:p
1235:c
1231:t
1229:{
1210:t
1202:S
1198:C
1181:t
1173:S
1169:C
1161:t
1153:S
1149:C
1099:(
1074:(
1050:(
1034:(
982:.
975:.
963:Y
887:(
862:(
836:(
813:(
799:(
742:(
663:@
656:W
632:|
607:|
585:|
560:|
526:.
300:.
151:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
