Talk:Apartheid/Archive 7

869:

I'm only trying to make a point here which I believe to be very relevant. I also think the article would be better served by making a sincere attempt to portray the experiences of freedom fighters in apartheid (in their own words) as well as the architects of apartheid (in their own words). And these words should be presented in their entirety. While you might not like the architects of apartheid, they're the ones that came up with the apartheid idea and the best way to get an understanding of what apartheid was intended to accomplish is to get the story straight from the horse's mouth. In such a way, a clear picture should emerge and the readers will be able to judge for themselves. Personally, as a liberal Afrikaner I've been trying to get a handle on apartheid for years now but everywhere I turn I am frustrated by equivocation and misrepresentation of facts. It is important for me to understand where I should have seen clearly the horrible nature of what was happened, so that I can set my moral compass and continue to live as an ethical person. It might be offend you for me to say this, but I didn't see clearly that anything was wrong until I moved out of South Africa. It's about high time that we accept that not all Afrikaners were 100% behind apartheid, that white people were heavily indoctrinated with nationalistic agenda, and that there were (and still maybe are) some misguided souls who even sincerely believed they had the moral high ground. The issue is a lot more complicated in practice than it is made to sound.

1827:; "In post-apartheid South Africa, millions of South Africans, mostly black, have continued to live in poverty, as it has been difficult to compensate quickly for generations of educational and social neglect. Poverty among whites, previously rare, has increased greatly. While some have attributed this partly to the legacy of the apartheid system, increasingly many attribute it to the failure of the current government to tackle social issues. In addition, the current government has struggled to achieve the monetary and fiscal discipline to ensure both redistribution of wealth and economic growth. Since the ANC-led government took power, the United Nations Human Development Index of South Africa has fallen, while it was steadily rising until the mid-1990s. Some of this could possibly be attributed to the AIDS pandemic and the failure of the government to take steps to address it." - So I'm wondering if we could, in a NPOV way, reflect the minority view that South Africa is better because it no longer has apartheid but it is worse in terms of safety and economy. It doesn't need to a be a big section in the article, maybe just a brief mention. :::And here's an external link to what could be used as a reference ::: 1668:; "In post-apartheid South Africa, millions of South Africans, mostly black, have continued to live in poverty, as it has been difficult to compensate quickly for generations of educational and social neglect. Poverty among whites, previously rare, has increased greatly. While some have attributed this partly to the legacy of the apartheid system, increasingly many attribute it to the failure of the current government to tackle social issues. In addition, the current government has struggled to achieve the monetary and fiscal discipline to ensure both redistribution of wealth and economic growth. Since the ANC-led government took power, the United Nations Human Development Index of South Africa has fallen, while it was steadily rising until the mid-1990s. Some of this could possibly be attributed to the AIDS pandemic and the failure of the government to take steps to address it." - So I'm wondering if we could, in a NPOV way, reflect the minority view that South Africa is better because it no longer has apartheid but it is worse in terms of safety and economy. It doesn't need to a be a big section in the article, maybe just a brief mention. :::And here's an external link to what could be used as a reference ::: 1951:

Commonwealth and the United States and the United Nations placed heavy trade sanction against South Africa in the 70s and 80s and so forth it made it pretty hard to be prosperous and it in fact resulted in more immigrant Africans losing jobs (who move to South Africa by the hundreds, while even in its flawed state of apartheid it was more safe and prosperous than any other nation in Africa at that time) and the sanctions which were supposed to help the native and immigrant Africans ended up hurting them because they hurt the people who owned the corporations. I did another search and found a Knowledge article and it mentions how the sanctions hurt the native Africans who they were trying to help; "May 8, 2009 ... Disinvestment (or divestment) from South Africa was first advocated in the 1960s, ... Britain to take up economic sanctions against South African though. ... they would harm the people we are most concerned about - the Africans and those .... Main article: Economic history of South Africa#Sanctions ...

1037:

continent from their ethnic group. I know apartheid was bad, but someone must write about what they ACCOMPLISHED. Hitler was a good ruler, only if u exclude his hatred and what he done against other races (and his foreign policy), theres nothing racist about saying that, Hitler was only the worst and most evil man to live cuz he killed so many innocent non-christian whites. Technically, every president before JFK was racist in not giving rights to blks. In australia, blacks werent allowed to live like whites until after WW2. but they still dont talk about it, cuz they didnt give a name to the segregation that was impossed (unlike south africa). Weither it was the national party that made south africa the way it was or not, the article still says SA UNDER APARTHEID (1948-1994), so we must show how the country developed under this period rather then saying just all the negatives that the goverment did. now that was a mouthful

678:

logical. If you say you do not want to dominate the Native, it means that you stand for a policy of equality." (Johannes Strydom, later Prime Minister, in 1948). Even if you believe that apartheid's policy aims were sincere, the "best intentions" were never properly implemented anyway (I suspect you'll agree with me on that). The land allocated to homelands was too little (even according to Tomlinson and Eiselen, Verwoerd's own experts), there was insufficient commitment to the required expenditure on the homelands, and there were massive inequalities everywhere in the system - real education decreased from R8.70 to R4.90 per black child between 1954 and 1965, while for white children it increased from R50 to R75. In practice, which is where it counts, apartheid was always undeniably a system of white racial supremacy.

698:

Verwoerd, the tempo of educational development quickened sharply, especially for Blacks. Seven universities were established in the 1960’s. Two for Whites, one each for Couloreds and Indians and three for Blacks. Between 1959 and 1967 the school attendance for whites rose by 18.1% (to 744,647) and for Blacks by 59.3% (to 2,233,504). The increase in university attendance was even more remarkable (Whites by 60.8% and Blacks by 126.4%) In 1958 a total of R152,400,000 was spent on education. By 1967 this amount was doubled to R303,850,000 (Du Preez: Key to a Continent). This figure includes the expenditure by the Dept of Public Works on the erection and maintenance of educational buildings and other infrastructure as well as the expenditure for education by the department of Bantu Affairs.

2587:

linguistic/cultural, and makes a fair amount of sense - most of the channels were for black languages, after all, and the channel announcers can speak different languages - the Coloureds and Indians would have watched SATV1 too, and TV2 and TV3 show a Nguni/Sotho split - not then classified as racial, but certainly practical (linguistic). If anything, the United States has a more apparently racist (though non-governmental) line-up, what with 'BET', shamelessly 'Black Entertainment Television' - explicitly race-specific, quarantining one ethnic group whose language is the same as the rest. Would it not be fairer to give specific examples of racist programming and news in South Africa? That was certainly rife, and would make the point much better.

655:

every ethnic nation's culture are to be respected and should have the opportunity to develop along the lines of its own set of principles (and not be forced to develop along the principles of liberal individualism and rationalism). If you read the "quotes from the architects of apartheid" against this background it will make more sense. You have to remember that, in SA there was also a difference of opinion. Even to the extent that some believed in white supremacy. You should therefore be careful whose quotes you consider. We should constrict ourselves to the mainstream NP policy. There was a minority group under the leadership of Dr Hertzog, who left the NP in 1966, who critisized Dr Verwoerd's policy precisely because of this difference.

174:"...There was a deliberate policy in "white South Africa" of making services for black people inferior to those of whites, to try to "encourage" black people to move into the black homelands. Black people ended up with services greatly inferior to those of whites, and, to a lesser extent, to those of Indians and coloureds...." Do you have any proof of that? As I do recall it, the services for each group were paid for from the budget for this group. The budget was determined by the taxes generated by this group (+ subsidies by White taxpayers). So the quality (or quantity) of services was dependent on these amount. Monetary income differences determined of course the amount of tax money available. 1096:

falling since 1995, after a constant increase from the 1930s, by 1995, the HDI of South Africa (including Black people) was 0.78, almost enough to be classed 'developed'. Now it's 0.66, about Tajikstan's level. The Apartheid goverment had the lowest corruption rate in Africa, and would be tiny compared to the crazy current corruption. Literacy rate for Black people in 1994: 80% - all black people in South Africa were given the right to a primary education and if they wanted, even secondary if they really wanted (Like Mandela). Yes, during apartheid blacks were made in some ways inferior, which is definitely not correct, however , we mustn't be ignorant and just ignore the accomplishments.--

1368:, have you any idea how offensive it is to argue that, despite all the abuses of apartheid, it had many great "Accomplishments" and that blacks were actually better off when apartheid was in place? I suggest that you (1) look for real references (not youtube videos), (2) check your spelling, (3) move the section to the right level in the article (currently it has "Negotiations" as a subsection of "Accomplishments", which I suppose is true in one sense, but is probably not what you intended...), and (4) try to get some clarity of thought - are you suggesting that it got better during apartheid, or has got worse since then, or both? 1924:'s (or his autobiography 'The Long Road To Freedom') page it has a quote of him saying something like "There will always be those who say that the Communists used us ... who says we didn't use them?" I think the inclusion of these things in the article in a NPOV way will help ease the tensions of opposing POVs. The following is a link to website with an extreme POV - this is the first time I've ever found the wensite after looking up "communism mandela south africa" in google, but it'll probably give you a good idea of the poeple's point of view who think that Mandela was a crook - surely we can find a middle ground somewhere. 1733:

their privileges have been taken away, and hanker back for the 'good old days', but this is hardly an accomplishment. As for a discussion of the booming economy since the end of apartheid, or the vast expansion of roads, electricity and other infrastructure into previously unserviced rural areas, or the opening up of the country to global capital and the movement of people and the increase in crime and the drugs trade associated with this, or the failings of the current government, these belong in those articles. The current South African government is so far from communist it's laughable. But that's not relevant here.

706:

pupil in the colonies. You will find a much greater disparity (The same would be true for the expenditure on education in the colonies of France, Belgium, Portugal and Spain). The point is that the Whites in South Africa was at that stage a developed community (much as the European communities), whereas the Blacks were in an early stage of development (as was the communities in the African colonies of Europe. Both their educational needs and their potential for generating money were much lower than in the developed communities. Even today you will find that disparity between the first- and third world countries.

1454:

wouldn't you say? Many people ignore the fact (or don't know about the fact) that many native Africans actually migrated to 'Apartheid South Africa' because of the severe turmoil brought on from communist revolutionaries in the surrounding nations. Today, South Africa is one of the most violent nations on the face of the earth. Many things about Apartheid were very evil, and communism's ugly face in every aspect of South African's lives I would say, is also very evil. However, this article focuses on the first evil, and it celebrates the 'peaceful' ushering in of the next.

865:

that there were horrible human rights abuses taking place, but I think we lose sight of the effectiveness of the South African propaganda machine. You could even say the majority of the country was in a violent state, but there were definitely regions that seemed pretty safe and secure. From what I remember, in the village where I lived (in the early 1990s) white children would roam freely in the streets without fear. No one ever pointed a gun at me (or them). My suspicion is that it was only the US media that made South Africa appear to be in the middle of a civil war.

714:

respectively (Van Rensburg: Bevolkingsontploffing in SA). During this time and in the face of the population explosion, they managed to increase the literacy among Blacks to more than 50% and more than 90% among the 7-20 age group. Even the poison-spitting Unesco 1967-report on Apartheid had to admit that “the first priority in African education is mass literacy and the extention of primary education at the lowest level. In this field there is no doubt that the present South African government has achieved results.” (Unesco: Apartheid, ibid) --

1535:

their way it would be far worse. I have the book right here with me, it's "World History - and Cultures" and it was published by A Beka Book Publications and authored by George T. Thompson and Laurel Elizabeth Hicks, but if I'm not allowed to violate copyright laws by typing in its contents and none of y'all own the book, then how am I going to prove that the book exists and that it basically states that apartheid is bad but communism would be worse - how do I go about showing this book as my source?

2353:"SAFETY AND SECURITY: ... South Africa has seen a number of attacks directed at foreigners – particularly refugees or immigrants from other African nations. Many of the attacks were centered in Johannesburg and the province of Gauteng in low income neighborhoods and informal settlements, but incidents of mob violence have taken place throughout the country. Many individuals have been killed in these incidents and many more, both targeted victims and bystanders, have been injured..." 2695:

worth discussion whether to change it. The problem with "South African apartheid" and similar names is that they imply that this is just one of a number of equivalent manifestations of apartheid. In past debates about the name, "apartheid in Israel" has dominated that discussion. The term Apartheid applies primarily to Apartheid in South Africa (the original and only "official" use of the term), and in an ideal world the article should be at the name

31: 2340:"CRIME: Although the vast majority of visitors complete their travels in South Africa without incident, visitors should be aware that criminal activity, often violent, occurs routinely. Notwithstanding government anti-crime efforts, violent crimes such as armed robbery, carjacking, mugging, "smash and grab" attacks on vehicles, and other incidents are regularly reported by visitors and resident Americans..." 1190:

than ever. You will find that in one of the culture of south africa sections that whites were 4 times richer than a black person in 1994. Now it's nearing 6 times. Besides, white people make up only 10%, black people 80%. It would have to be a MEGA fall of standard of life for white people to even make a 'slight' fall. The contrast would probably have to be reverting the white people to that of the Afghans.--

616:

example, was carried out by a few policemen, whose lives were threatened by the protesters. I concede that too much violence was being used in that specific instance, but this does not mean the system was repressive. There have, for example been instances were American forces have used too much violence: Vietnam, Hiroshima, Irak etc. but this does not make the American liberal democracy a repressive system.

988:".... So couldn't we have a name change to "Racial segregation in the (Union, then later the) Republic of South Africa"? Or perhaps "Apartheid in the Republic of South Africa," or maybe just "Apartheid in South Africa"... Because that's the approach that the Wikipedians have used for the U.S.'s past shameful practices, and most white South Africans are just as ashamed of their past in that one area. 2447:

under slavery'? Some Afrikaners might be offended if all we call their nation when they were in power is 'apartheid South Africa' - while apartheid was wrong in many ways, the National Party did many good things as well. Why not 'South Africa when it actually prospered' or 'South Africa when they finally got their own nation before they lost it'? Just a thought.

2281:

leads to. This is not to say that blacks are genetically inferior. Rather their cultural institutions are not the same as western institutions, they do not have a cultural tradition of rule of law, private property and democracy. The post colonial period in Africa has been a great tragedy for this reason. It is very much like Orwell's Animal farm.

245:

last forty years I have never read so much hogwash intersperced with rare momemts of truth in my entire life. Insisting that apartheid compares with Nazism is hilarious. Saying that it was worse than any other African 'system' is, frankly, laughable. Just look at Zim, the Congo, anywhere south of the Sahara. No. Start again.

1386:

this because the article might create an impression that the white people didn't bother to end apartheid, and only made life hell for non-whites. Many Germans are ashamed of living under the Nazi Germany, and not being against it, but South Africans want to impose that they did try in many ways that when

3108:

Say.. The UN section begins with a quote from Che Guevara, and I know that racism is bad and all that: that is well established, I was just wondering if any attention should be brought to the fact that Nelson Mandela himself as admitted the the help the communists gave him in coming to power and also

2990:

On a side note: I don't necessarily see why there should be made reference to 'apartheid in Israel' seeing as how 'segregation in Israel' means the exact same thing, except for the fact that South Africa had apartheid and the U.S. had segregation and maybe likening the Jewish people to South Africans

2446:

I mean, it was a Republic, it had a name of its own which didn't include 'apartheid' as it's associated with in many places on Knowledge, and if we're going to call it 'apartheid South Africa' then why don't we call a portion of U.S. History 'segregated America'? Or at an even earlier date - 'America

2280:

With regard to this. I would like to point out that it, was white, Western Europeans and their social institutions that built South Africa in to the great country that it became. Why should the builders of a society be disenfranchised from it. One only need look to Zimbabwe for what black nationalism

1732:

I don't see any point to an "accomplishments" section. As mentioned above, this would be like "accomplishments of slavery". So, yes, white people had an artificially high standard of living and thought everything was rosy. It's fairly obvious that this came at a cost, or that some would complain that

1615:

Potential problems: the publishing company is a christian partisan publisher. Not that there's anything wrong with that: it does not in itself disqualify the book being used in the article. However, you will save yourself a lot of trouble if you find a countervailing view and present that, which will

1534:

Say, I've got a good source which speaks briefly about the accomplishments of apartheid South Africa. Its copyright is 1985, so it still spoke of things like even though Western conservatives didn't agree with the apartheid policy that the history they had observed showed them that if the Marxist had

1505:

No, I definitely would not say that the state which inherited these catastrophic social problems is anywhere near as bad as the state that created them. Then again, this is not a forum, so unless you have sources to back up thoise opinions and puit them in the article, don't use the cover of the talk

1385:

First off, sorry about my terrible spelling, I was being very impatient with my typing and wasn't checking my spelling. But more to the point, the reason why I wanted to create this section of the article was to show that Apartheid wasn't like a Nazi regime, or any other extreme racist society. I did

1165:

But I suggest you consider the question: why don't black people want to go back to that era if it was improving their lives? You say the HDI of SA improved "including Black people". Well I'm sure the number counted black people, but that doesn't necessarily mean that their lives were better than they

868:

Regardless of what you think about what I've just said, I think it is very apparent from these discussion pages that people with different colored skins had very different subjective experiences during apartheid. Please do not attack my character on this issue... because I'm firmly anti-apartheid and

864:

I take serious issue with the depiction of apartheid South Africa during the final years as everywhere in a state of constant upheaval. Having lived in South Africa, I've always found it distasteful that my experience seemed so idyllic when the entire country was supposedly in an uproar. I don't deny

262:

If you want to make a constructive contribution, please be specific about your suggested improvements. Saying "start again" is a ridiculous request. I see no mention of Nazism in the article, for example. The talk page is not a forum to sound off, but to contribute constructively towards the article.

3433:

article along with clear warnings which explain that the video expresses right-wing Afrikaner views, even as a right-wing Afrikaner myself I see no need for this video to be on this page for this simple reason; apartheid is nowhere addressed in the entire video. A brief summary of a few years of the

2714:

I agree, South African apartheid sounds.. disgusting. It just doesn't make sense or flow. I guess it's because it doesn't exist anymore (well, not towards black people anymore) that it sounds so strange, and apartheid was a section of this nation's history. Also i agree with Zaian, although there is

2178:

The lede was too long, and there is no need for references in the lede. It should summarise the content of the article. So I moved the material into other sections. Now the lede is too short; I can eventually help rectify that, but perhaps someone else will in the meantime. The next thing I am going

1294:

I'm aware that the Nats had black education. And the result of the segregated education that they introduced was not a generation of well-educated, contented individuals, to say the least. Contrariwise, it was the generation which made the contemporary regime totally untenable. Tell me, why was that

709:

In 1967 most of the black teachers had only a st 6 with a basic educational diploma, whereas the white teachers almost all had at least 2 years tertiary training. Needless to say the per pupil cost on salaries would differ markedly. Also, because of the budget restraints, the dept of Bantu Education

654:

Apartheid was not based on white racial superiority. The proponents of apartheid was Calvinists who believe that everybody is stained by sin. Nobody is inherantly better than anybody else. God however, created a diverse universe and that should be respected. Apartheid was based on the principle that

345:

As a quick glance at my user page will demonstrate, I cannot claim to be completely unbiased in this issue, but it seems to me that this article could be greatly improved if it had more references. Currently much of it seems to read as POV even if it is NPOV fact, a problem which could be amended if

203:

YES! Many, in fact hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants moved to South Africa from north of the border and from the homelands. Many people from Mozambique tried to get into South Africa to be "suppressed" by walking through the Kruger National Park, many were eaten by lions and those who made

3194:

It's a good quote, and could be appropriate at the start of a chapter in a book, but I don't think Knowledge should use quotes in this way. Singling it out like that doesn't seem appropriate as a section heading in a NPOV encyclopedia, especially since Che Guevara is a polarizing figure. There are

2813:

I favour a name which shows that this is about a period of South African history. The name should have apartheid in it; it would be impossible to have an article about this period which wasn't primarily about apartheid, even if it is about other things as well. Just like Spanish history 1939-75 has

2490:

In the context of this article referring to Apartheid South Africa does indeed make sense. Just as articles about Cuba (1959 to 2008) will refer to Castro's Cuba or articles on the history of Britain will refer to Imperial Britain. It is part of history. Using the term is very dependant on context,

2383:

These were not the cases when South Africa had the bad policy of apartheid, but had better policies in other areas. Couldn't there be some honorary mention in the article that "Even though they apartheid and that was very bad, South Africa was the safest it's ever been. But today, that is no longer

2049:

Well, as you all know, if the government puts an end to apartheid, this does not necessarily mean that it's really ended amongst the population. So, is it just me to not read anything about the situation TODAY? Shouldn't it be resolved whether everything is really peaceful or democratic, or whether

1453:

Apartheid was very bad, as you well know, and the communist revolutionaries using apartheid to stir up hatred in South Africa and international sanction against the "Evil Apartheid Regime" and eventually take over the nation for communism (or a form thereof) is at least as equally bad as Apartheid,

1427:

Yeah, it's problematic. You'd run into the same difficulties inserting text about the "accomplishments" of slavery, or for that matter of racial segregation and discrimination, in the US; or, for that matter, of the benefits of German policies towards the Jews in the middle of the 20th century. The

1298:

A word to the wise that has little to do with Knowledge: defending the Nats' rule is not a good idea if you don't want to look like a racist. Back onto wikipedia: substantiate the idea that the majority of South Africans (by definition, not primarily white people) had better lives than they do now,

1036:

i dont see anywere were it says about the economy of sa under apartheid, i seriously think this article was solely created to try and brainwash people that sa under apartheid made it the worst economy on the african continent and that all the whites wanted to do was kill all the blacks and rule the

729:

No, Strydom meant whites were superior to blacks, period. They were quite blunt about their racism in the late 1940s - which is of course what the white electorate wanted, and responded to by voting for apartheid. The sophistry only came later with Verwoerd's "good neighbourliness". My figures are

713:

Instead of running Apartheid down for giving inferior education to Blacks, they should be praised for their efforts and the phenomenal results. In 1951 Blacks in the greater South African Area (including homelands) numbered 12,671,000 and Whites 2,642,000. By 1970 they were 21,447,000 and 3,751,000

615:

What is your definition of racism? Mine is "racial supremacy". Racial segregation is not racism. You talk about the "repressive and racist actions of the apartheid government". Of course it is possible to name unfortunate incidents in any country's or system's history. The Sharpville "massacre" for

3480:

Today, October 8th 2009AD, someone removed a chunk from the Presidency of De Klerk section, I didn't know if it had been discussed here at all but it looks like it hasn't been. It left a link broken and it looked kind of fishy so I Undid it by default. If anyone wants to discuss any improvement to

2245:

To answer your question in my point of view, i would say yes most definitely apartheid still exists strongly, as mentioned above we all live in a mixed community nowadays, but certain groups of within these races will not mix, for instance, a strongly apostolic family will very rarely if ever even

2134:

This needs saying over and over again, apartheid is "separate development", supported/enforced by the nation state. Lots of people suffer racism, in some places populations have been moved round by fiat, and those people may or may not live happily with their new neighbours. But the touch-stone of

1063:

If you arbitrarily ignore Hitler's agression and genocide, what's left? The way he cheated his way to power with a gang of thugs? His cosmic vanity and propaganda? The way he encouraged Germans to think that their GErmanity was more important than their humanity? I could go on. Where was the "good

701:

The expenditure by the different departments of Education as such in 1966 was R54 million on Whites, R39 million on Blacks and less than 7 million on Coloureds and Indians. (Unesco: Apartheid-its effects on education, science, culture and information, 1968,). That totals less than R100 million.The

638:

Racial segregation is very frequently racist, especially when imposed by one side on another. I am not talking just about repressive actions by the police. The whole political system of Apartheid was premised on white racial superiority. Any number of quotes from the architects of apartheid can be

575:

The apartheid government and its supporters often tried to promote the idea that apartheid was kind to the blacks. I don't think it's a view that can be supported with any real credibility in the face of all the repressive and grotesquely racist actions of the apartheid government over more than 4

3371:

Perhaps if you watch the whole documentary, since you (Seb az86556) claim to be an aficionado on African affairs, you would realise how objectively the facts are presented. The entity who published the material has no political affiliation and is dedicated to a fair and balanced dissemination of

2694:

Thanks UKER for reigniting debate on this page and its title. Have a look through the talk page archives and you will see plenty of agonising debate about what to call this article, which you may not have been aware of. However, the current compromise title isn't necessarily the best, and it is

1822:

Thank you, BillMasen. The Knowledge: Reliable Sources page states in the opening paragraph that "Knowledge articles should cover all major and significant-minority views that have been published by reliable sources. See Knowledge:Neutral point of view." And I think that in general many Westerners

1663:

1189:

Black people's well being has greatly fallen since the end of apartheid. Black unemployment has gone from 8% in 1994 to 30% at the current year, this definitly affects HDI. Another suggestion that white people's wealth has ironically increased is that white people are richer than the black people

705:

Even if all these expenditures are taken into account, there is still a disparity of approximally R153 per White pupil compared to R63 per Black pupil. This disparity should be understood in context. Simply put, you should compare the British expenditure per pupil in the UK to its expenditure per

244:

Quite frankly, there is so much politically-correct, subjective and biased comment and plain lies by statement or omission in this Wiki entry that I suggest the entire thing is deleted and a neutral official historian be asked to re-write it. As an Englishman who has lived in South Africa for the

2426:

what I am somewhat missing in this article is a word or two about the motivations for setting up the system. Simply saying that racism was the only motivation is short-sighted and does not allow future generations to learn from the past. Including a short paragraph on how good-willed people with

2403:

Invmog, why are you so determined to find some praise for the apartheid system? Apartheid "was a system of legal racial segregation" and nothing more. Crime, poverty, unemployment and other social ills are completely divorced from this. If you're really determined to to praise the old government

1134:

is saying is that instead of having an article that only bemoans the evils of Apartheid, we should include that it was very wrong in many ways, but also include what was going on in Africa at the time, why the had Apartheid, and that not all Afrikaners are racists and evil, but they had some bad

780:

Adi Schlebusch: It's nice to see that there are still sensible people out there, who don't buy into political correctness, and objectively review all the facts. Too bad scientific research is discredited if it doesn't suit the politically correct agenda of mainstream society. You have my deepest

693:

Firstly, concerning your quote on Strydom: The idea of separation and equality for the different ethnic-nations is that everyone is the master (“boss”) in his own country. Therefore whites could not vote in black countries and vice versa. There always was equality before the law, anyway, but not

186:

I see. So their demands for majority rule were just a misunderstanding? Incidentally, did any blacks immigrate come from outside sa (which would be true voting with their feet)? The system you describe was only in place for the last few years of Apartheid, and in any case was a pure stitch up to

2598:

came in and changed the article name to "South African apartheid". Besides the fact that this is a ridiculous name, they made the change without any discussion, ignoring reams of previous discussion on this topic. If you want to revisit it AGAIN, by all means do, but please have the courtesy to

1805:

Hi Bill, the reference is in South African statistics. Becuase they are 80% of the population, any sudden change in statistics is extremely likely to have an affect/be an affect of them. And by the way, I can assure you that crime is 3 times worse now than it was in 1989. Invog made an exellent

1412:

Since this article apparentley only refers to apartheid, not the actual real situation of the country during this period of time, i deletd this section to help sort out disputes. It is making people think im racist and 'any judgment of the good points of apartheid' is aparentley a crime, unlike

820:

I have to agree with Adi. I've seen some value judgments and partial claims in this article. I've also seen the statement of a lot of facts with no references. I'm going to hang out some citation needed signs and edit out some of what i perceive to be POVs or biased statements. Not changing any

3255:

reliable sourcing and some "Material on Smuts" which "could be relevant if cited" I would greatly appreciate it, because frankly I feel if I tried it myself in my inexperienced state it would only cause more hassle to fix my mess than it would if I just confess my inability. Have a great day!

2586:

South African television was indeed entwined with the effects of Apartheid, but I don't think it's fair to say that because it was divided up linguistically that this is evidence: Britain has the S4C Welsh channel, and America has its Spanish channels, etc. This is not specifically racist, but

2119:

As far as average middle class living is concerned, I'll give you an example of the cul-de-sack I live in. The couple in house #1 is a white Afrikaans male and Portuguese female. House #2 is an Indian male and English speaking white female. House #3 is a divorced middle age while lady and her

1986:

Another point I must make is that the huge sudden downfall in 1994 personally I don't think it's because of the race of the government, but because of the ACTUAL party thats in control. The amazingly stupid ANC has the most primitive ideas of controlling a country, ones not fit enough even for

1763:

I agree. Presumably black people in SA do not think that the Nationalist era resulted in more accomplishments for them than the current era. Otherwise, they would want to go back to apartheid, right? And since the 6 parties in SA with the most votes (amounting to over 95% of the total) are not

1333:

This is one the sections of apartheid that really anger me. Yes, black education was inferior to white education (despite being still the best for blacks than any other african country), it was a lousy system, only supplying the basic nessesities. And BillMasen, I CAN find the evidence for the

1095:

Will do fellow. During apartheid the life expectancy of a black person increased so fast that a black person in South Africa would live the longest out of any black person on the continent. Apartheid created the 'South African NHS' (although it wasn't a great success). Apartheid's HDI has been

677:

I generally read the quotes from the architects of apartheid in the context of the apartheid government's actions, but there are plenty which don't even need that context: "Either you are the boss, the equal, or the inferior. If you are not the boss, you are a man's equal... it is so clear and

3452:

Having watched the entire documentary, I noticed you had only watched the first part of the documentary (Founding of A Nation). The Second part titled (A Republic is Born) Thoroughly covers the policy of Apartheid including a spoken narrative by former State President F.W. De Klerk, the man

3254:

Great; thank you Redthoreau! I, however, do not yet feel confident enough in my own editing abilities to make large changes on an article of this size, so if anyone else would like to incorporate into the article more things about "Nelson Mandela's workings with the communists" with plenty of

1920:'s quote, if y'all would allow it, should be added in the South African Border War section which went something like "Whoever controls the tip of Africa controls... I want it for communism." Although it's true that once in power the ANC didn't use a communist form of government though, and on 1702:

of the flawed policy of apartheid, but rather, the accomplishments and the prosperity created by the South African government before 1994 compared to the comparative poverty of South Africa today. (Many of my relatives live in South Africa and they speak of extremely high gas prices, roads in

697:

I don’t know where you got the figures you quote for expenditure on education. Mine look completely different. It is important to consider that the illiteracy rate in the greater South African region in 1920 among Whites was 2.1% and among Blacks 90.3%. During the heyday of Apartheid under Dr

3314:

Documentary Motion Picture: Describing the geographical & historical progression of South Africa & its complex social structure. With genuine footage of the various eras, narrated by the respective leaders from Jan Smuts, Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd, P.W. Botha, F. W. De Klerk & Eugene

3113:

against South West Africa (now Namibia) and South Africa in order to bring communism to the country by force. Oh, and the war last from 1966 to 1989 and I my grandfather and an uncle fought in that war. Perhaps Che's statement was not purely for humanitarian purposes, but to support a larger

1950:

Oh, and concerning the earlier statement "And as far as crime is concerned, if the Nats get the praise for the 50s and 60s, they also get the blame for the 70s and 80s, right?BillMasen (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)" I will say that there is much evident to point to the fact that when the

702:

the rest (304 mil – 100 mil = more than R200 million) was spent by other departments, the bulk of which was for the erection of schools and supplying of facilities. Most (I’m still looking for the exact figure) of this went to blacks because of their dramatic increase in school attendance.

3162:

As for the quote in question, it is notable and beneficial as it outlines that South African apartheid was being denounced in the UN as early as 1964. The fact that the individual making the claims was a notable world figure, who would come to be praised post-mortem by Nelson Mandela

2162:

I've come to the article because it is listed as in need of wikification. I think the main need is for reorganisation and for reduction of detail where it is covered in daughter articles, or could be covered in daughter articles. I'm going to make some changes now for that purpose.

3025:

You are right, and yet the fact remains; apartheid only happened in places where the government officials spoke Afrikaans, and we all know that the Israeli government does not speak Afrikaans. What is the Hebrew word for segregation? Perhaps that could be the name of that article.

2427:(what were in their mind) good intentions justified the system would allow us to see how misguided one can be even with the noblest theoretical ideas in mind. In that way, people could actually learn a lesson here. (Of course, writing this according to NPOV is rather difficult...) 2207:

Thank you. I will try and wikify a bit more. I've been thinking: this is an incredibly important article for 20th century history. It should really be moving towards GA and potential FA. I wonder if it could chosen as part of a wikiproject collaboration drive or something similar?

1166:

are now; it could just as easily mean that the standard of living of white people has fallen more than the standard of black peoples lives has risen. Not that this is necessarily a good thing, but it would not fit with your belief that black people were better off before 1994.

1767:

Nobody is denying that the previous regime created priveleged and favourable conditions for white people. You need to substantiate the idea that it was better for black people than the current situation. If you can find anything to support that, it can be integrated into the

1902:

Earlier on this part of the talk page I was wrong in saying that the new government instituted communism - what I should have said instead was that they were heavily aided by the communists, and in this article under the United Nations section it opens up with a quote from

1251:

The idea that black people in SA want to eliminate all of the whites is an unsupported and, yes, racially tinged POV. If you can substantiate your claims about increased black poverty, and you haven't provided a source yet, it is conceivable they could go into the article.

3297:

Whoever: Here's your chance to explain the rationale for adding this crap. At least three editors have reverted this addition numerous times by now. If you do not explain why you deem this link a necessity, we will continue to remove it. So. We're waiting. Go for it.

549:

There is way too much leftist propaganda on this page. I'm sure a lot more emphises can be put on all the things that the white government did for the black people, like building them schools, hospitals and universities and supporting the homelands economically.

3118:

it says that he played an important role in the forming of the United Nations and unlike the League of Nation (which he also helped to form) the UN would have teeth. Should any of this about Jan Smuts be added? It is perhaps a bit off-topic and unnecessary.

2622:, the thing to do was simply go ahead and change it to one which, while perhaps not perfect, at least I reckon is a better one. So now what I don't get is your reasons for the revert, and unless there really is one, I think it's you who is in violation of 3358:

First and foremost, it begins with "bringing the light of civilized Europe to Africa" or some such... That's junk. Moreover, it was authored by the extremely right-winged Afrikaner Broadcasting Corporation, and you're trying tho spam on their behalf.

2104:. Obviously there are still black/white racism to some extend. As you have stated, just because the government removed the laws it does not mean that racism disappears among the people, you will find many examples of this in the media, search 280:

I ask yet again. If apartheid was so awfully jolly, why don't the majority of south africans want to go back to it? Either find your "official"(?) historian, suggest a specific contribution to the article, or clear off. It's that simple.

2898:

1) what do we say when people start deleting things which are related to SA history in this period, but not directly related to apartheid? After all, the article would be called Apartheid in South Africa, not apartheid & a few other

2734:

does not mean boldly disregarding the archives and ignoring the previous consensus and the lengthy discussions that have already been held on this topic. :) I'm happy to hear other suggestions for the title again, but wouldn't support

3109:

that Che was an avowed Communist and that Lenin said something along the lines of "Whoever controls the tip of Africa controls the world... I want it for communism" and that the communists Cubans helped the communists in Angola fight

2077:. The key is that Apartheid is defined as discrimination/racism enforced by law. Using the term in the past sense is therefor correct as Apartheid ended when the laws were abolished. Any current acts of discrimination and/or racism 3114:

communist agenda, and maybe we could ind another UN quote which points out the flawed apartheid but which doesn't come from a communist. Furthermore concerning the UN section: according to the Knowledge article about South African

3328:

Therefore a factual documentary demonstrating genuine footage from the different eras and narration with historical speeches by South African leaders, undoubtedly highly relevant to the subject of South Africa & Apartheid.

1232:

power, their goal of becoming the sole ethnic group of the country is coming together as more whites are leaving. It would be the same as a polish family in newly polish annexed lands from Germany, desiring the land to be

371:

Could we use a word other than "struggle" in this article? As in "anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa". The word is such a favorite of socialist propagandists that anyone else that uses it automatically loses a bit of

2793:

just includes apartheid policies, while South Africa under apartheid could mean everything that has gone on in SA between 1948-1994. I am FOR 'Apartheid in South Africa. It will also solve the 'apartheid'vs.'Apartheid

2370:" states that "Hijackings and cash-in-transit heists particularly have been shown to be on the increase. The rape situation has become so bad that the country has been referred to as the "rape capital of the world"." 1130:, I think they're talking about the accomplishments of their government in other areas - even though Apartheid was bad. Usually, in order to understand anything properly one must know the context and I believe what 2902:

2) Or alternatively, we could create an entirely seperate article: "history of South Africa 1948-94". What would the article "history of South Africa 1948-94" look like if it wasn't mostly about the development of

730:

from Ernst Malherbe - Education in South Africa, 1977, quoted in "White Tribe of Africa" by David Harrison. You're fighting a losing battle trying to persuade anyone that apartheid was benevolent to the blacks.

2533:

It contains entire passages over several paragrphs that might or might not be true. When dealing with a contentious issue such as this one, I expect a footnote after every other sentence to make it waterproof.

2222:

I've also had a go at it. Previously it was full of duplication and frankly quite a lot of waffle. I am working on consolidating into chronological order, which will help to solve the problem of duplication.

133:

Agree. The article has too much much to cover to include it all under one heading. It is hard to read. Ideally there would be more summary and separate articles created to cover subsections in more detail.

1915:

but it isn't made too obvious that the communists were trying to take over South Africa by using soviet machinery, Castro's Cuban troops and going through Angola and Namibia to get to South Africa. Perhaps

2144:

Actually, "apartheid" is a nearly meaningless political term today, used to mean "any practice I consider discriminatory". It is used to inflame and demonize, but carries little weight other than semantic.

177:

Also explain In what way the services available to Blacks were different to the average service levels in Africa. I guess there is a reason, why many Blacks chose to live under White rule with their feet.

1869:

with just once glance, and I think the page needs to demonstrate that white people had to accept the situation and try and make the best of it, as in helping the communities that are being segregated. --

2670:

suggests that if you see something wrong you just go change it, and someone is bound to revert it IF THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE CHANGE, but not just because you didn't ask before doing it. Again, see

2265:

Perhaps a section should be added to highlight the multitude of problems that SA is facing after the end of the apartheid. For example, extremely high crime rates, corruption, HIV and white emigration.

3008:

Apartheid did not only directly occur in South Africa. The apartheid government of South Africa continued the occupation of Namibia. I am all for a name change, but this is important to keep in mind.--

3195:

also many other international figures who played a more significant and more direct role in international opposition to apartheid. I think it should go, or should be used further down in the text.

2470:

Black south africans seem to believe that the system which was supposedly set up to favour them did not in fact do so. I'll take their opinion on what's good for them over someone else's any day.

745:

I agree with you that it is a losing battle trying to persuade you, because liberals generally are not open-minded. But at least there is still a few of us that will always hold to the truth. --

3322:

The Documentary discusses the historical events which inevitably established the previous status quo in South Africa with factual representations of South African & Neighbouring societies.

1413:

judjing america when it too, went through a period of 'apartheid', i am simply not going to bother to carry on, as it will only ,make people hate me more and make me sound like a verwoerd. --

2135:"apartheid" is always the state dividing the population into "communities", issueing different ID cards to the different groups, and granting them various different rights and obligations. 2120:

mother. House #4 is a black couple. House #5 is a black couple. House #6 is a black couple. The couple in house #7 is a white male and Indian lady and in house #8 is a Chinese couple. --

1394:, there were many white people who protested, and black people were given the right to live, have a home, and a homeland. Please do not take this the wrong way and relate it to Nazism.-- 1959:

en.wikipedia.org/Disinvestment_from_South_Africa - Cached - Similar" does this not even deserve a little more attention in this of all articles if we can put it forth in a NPOV way?

3400:

d) As a matter of fact I've watched the entire thing, and it's propaganda for an apologist stance on apartheid. Now wait until other people give their input and reach consensus.

3146:

If you would like to expand on Nelson Mandela's workings with the communists then his article would be the place to do that, and substantiate the claims with reliable sourcing.

1823:

believe that South Africa is better than ever while the British and Afrikaans who live there have seen a steep downward trend, the following quote is from the Knowledge page

1664:

believe that South Africa is better than ever while the British and Afrikaans who live there have seen a steep downward trend, the following quote is from the Knowledge page

1806:

example with many quotes, that can be furthermore added to if looked up on the internet:(i hope you remembered to read his comment because it answers your question above.)

3048:

Unfortunately, it's not up to us what we call the article on Israeli faux-apartheid. A number of people have called it that, it isn't our job to produce a non-POV name.

2991:

is easier for the public to swallow rather than likening the Jews to the Americans, or perhaps there could be a separate article for the so-called 'apartheid' in Israel.

984:

You know, I've never ever seen a Knowledge article entitled "The United States of America under segregation," in fact, now that you bring it up, that article's name is "

530:

And to the non-South Africans on this talk page, I apologise for the behaviour of my countrymen, not all white South Africans believe that apartheid was a good thing.--

2013:

in the Korean War be made mention, or, to make a separate page for the actual historical events that that time period and let this article solely focus on apartheid.

2873:

Would still including the period of South Africa's history and just changing the name to "Apartheid in South Africa" be a good compromise? What do you all think?

527:

And what's so undemocratic about socialism? Look at the Scandinavian countries, they're socialist and they're also amongst the most democratic countries on earth.

3154:

and not relevant to the article in question. However, you are obviously free to check and see if there are published sources that come to a similar conclusion.

2418:

I have been observing this talkpage for a while from a distance. Certainly, listing the present circumstances and complaining about them seems like a definite

1889:

But that's just not right. Nobody forced South African whites to vote for the Nationalists/apartheid. The only anti-apartheid party had a grand total of 1 seat

218:

So prove it, dude (sources). Sounding off on the talk page doesn't impress anyone. If apartheid was such a brilliant deal for them, why didn't blacks like it?

204:

it was deported, but they continually tried again and again. If the information in this article is true, then I must conclude that Mozabicans are masochists.

3410:

Seb and Thomas.macmillan put it very well so I can only repeat the main point they made: this is a kind of propaganda video which has no place on Knowledge.

2089:, not Apartheid. There are some Legacies of Apartheid still around and it will actually be good for the article to have a section on those. Examples are the 2246:

employ a person of different race, let alone socialize, The effects of apartheid seems to have a lasting effect and one wonders of it will ever end. Steve

845:

This article is in desparate need of citations and also a lot of trimming. It's full of waffle and repetition, making it almost unreadable in places.

2009:

Also, if this because article is the redirect page for a section of the history of South Africa I suggest that either the distinguished service of the

1012:

I like the name better as "South African apartheid" rather than "South Africa under apartheid"; in short, I support the name change done by user:UKER -

2821:

In other words, I am happy with the current name, and would not support any move which removed either the "period" aspect or the "apartheid" aspect.

3425:

So, I watched the video, and the funny thing is this; apartheid isn't even mentioned. Not once. Although maybe the video could be wiggled into the

2973: 390:

seems rather appropriate and used correctly in this context. It is the term that was and still is most often used by the driving forces behind the

1073:

Likewise, if you remove the racism/racial segregation idea from Apartheid, what's left? Not much, although you are welcome to try and dig it out.

985: 2305:

This is not a discussion forum. Unless you have sources which can be incorporated into the article, your private opinions have no business here.

403: 227:

Even if services were superior to neighbouring African countries (whoop di doo!), that does not prove that they weren't artificially kept low.

2545:

No explicit historical account on the motivations to set up apartheid is included that is well-referenced and would adhere to NPOV-policies.

2405: 2058:) I'm asking myself whether it's really over. Are there any ZAs here who could tell about the current situation in their country? :) -andy 1703:

disrepair, frequent power outages, high rates of crime, corruption in high places, ect., all of which were not issues in 1960 South Africa

870: 2093:, lower literacy and life expectancy among black people, higher unemployment among black people and the fact that many houses in previous 2247: 2059: 945: 766: 598:

above. Referencing the information will give it far more credibility and a NPOV. I'll work through some of it to see what we can do. --

2288: 889: 103: 1771:

And as far as crime is concerned, if the Nats get the praise for the 50s and 60s, they also get the blame for the 70s and 80s, right?

3378:

I agree with Seb. Any documentary which begins with "the civilizing light of europe" is unreliable and should not be on wikipedia.--

3344: 710:

introduced afternoon sessions for primary school Blacks. This resulted in a much hightened output by the available infrastructure.

694:

individual political equality in each other’s country (just like today where you don’t have political rights in another country).

2715:

somewhat an 'apartheid' going in on some countries such as Palestine, but 'official' SA is the only country to currently use it.

962:

Actually, shouldn't the title be "South Africa during Apartheid"? You wouldn't say "The United States South under segregation".--

3325:

The economic and geographic alterations which evolved the political process from British Colonialism to Republican Independence.

2948:

Well, perhaps the thing to do is create the article for the period and just make the apartheid-related titles redirect to it. --

464: 1907:- the communist revolutionary from South America - only there is no mention of the fact that he was a stark communist. In the 2548:

Since apartheid was primarily a legal system, more sources on legislation/laws are required with actual ad verbatim-quotes.

2976:' is what is used for another portion of South Africa's history. So should there perhaps be a separate article called the 2818:, even though there were obviously many things which happened in that period which were nothing to do with Franco at all. 2327:

The U.S. Department of State (which is legal to reproduce here) has these things to say about South Africa as it is today:

535: 399: 102:

There should be summaries on articles of this length. Totally impossible to understand w.o. reading the whole thing... --

2699:, but the clarification in the title has been necessary to make it clear that paragraphs about Israel are out of scope. 1551: 3221:'There will always be those who say that the communists were using us. But who is to say that we were not using them?' 3415: 3142:

can click on his linked name and read all about his Marxist views, which are stated in the first line of his article.

884:

Oh, and not sure about that sign. It appears most of the petty apartheid signs were vandalized or stolen by 1989. See

800:

This is a discussion page for improving the article. May I suggest that you conduct your racialist love-in elsewhere?

2907: 1299:

using reliable sources, and put them into the article. If you can't do that, there really is nothing to talk about.

885: 2113: 2097:

areas still have an extra outside toilet that was for the exclusive use of the black cleaning lady and/or gardener.

1764:

connected to apartheid it would seem that they don't want it back. And they know what's best for themselves, right?

967: 913: 447: 38: 2919: 497: 462: 395: 3110: 2409: 2136: 1908: 928: 874: 750: 719: 660: 621: 558: 531: 209: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1987:

Afghanistan, but I seriously believe that the downfall was mainly contributed due to a whole new government.--

2063: 2404:

enter this on the South Africa page under history, this nonsense doesn't belong on a page about segregation.

2271: 2251: 2090: 949: 770: 107: 3340: 3411: 3235:

A cursory look at south africa would suggest that the ANC got far more out of it all than the communists.

2799: 2720: 2292: 1992: 1874: 1844: 1418: 1399: 1339: 1238: 1195: 1101: 1042: 893: 437: 3426: 3379: 3009: 2644:

I am in favor of a name change and I am in favor of a discussion before any change in the name is made.

2556: 2432: 2367: 2213: 2198: 2184: 2168: 1481: 963: 909: 3315:

Terre'Blanche. Including an episode explaining the policy of Separate Development designated Apartheid

2456: 2267: 3336: 466: 3332: 3217:

As for NM's collaboration with the communists, you should also consider NM's own quote on the matter:

3181: 2284: 1539: 941: 762: 666: 627: 564: 139: 827: 553:

The article creates the impression that apartheid was racism, while it was, in essence, separatism.

410:

was and still does consists of a large number of socialist propagandists (some of them deserving of

3279: 3240: 3070:

So back to the issue at hand; what do we do about the name change or do we just do nothing at all?

3053: 2927: 2826: 2571: 2475: 2310: 2112:

if you want. The most recent notable cases of racism actually was not between white and black, see

2035: 1776: 1642: 1511: 1304: 1257: 1078: 924: 831: 805: 746: 715: 656: 617: 554: 407: 331: 286: 232: 205: 192: 157: 2467:

I don't know. Does it always have to be "Nazi Germany"? Does it always have to be "soviet Russia"?

1228:

And, in answer to your questioin, they don't want to 'go back' to apartheid because they now have

3465: 3089: 2815: 2744: 2604: 2101: 1738: 490: 268: 3481:

the De Klerk section then this is the place to do it; all comments and suggestions are welcome.

2539:

Some of the passages read like stories told by a bonfire at night, and they have no place here.

1967:) 17:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC) (I later editted some of this message's content, so I'll sign again) 2781:

Sounds alot better than 'South African apartheid' - and the name somewhat sounds more neutral.

3084:

Summarising the above, so far there is no consensus on a change, perhaps a mild keep, if any.

2795: 2716: 2614:

I simply dropped by here and saw an article with a "ridiculous name" as you call it. Going by

1988: 1870: 1840: 1414: 1395: 1365: 1335: 1234: 1191: 1131: 1123: 1097: 1038: 506: 482: 3486: 3439: 3401: 3360: 3299: 3260: 3124: 3075: 3031: 2999: 2878: 2764: 2649: 2552: 2540: 2534: 2512: 2452: 2428: 2389: 2209: 2194: 2180: 2164: 2125: 2018: 1972: 1964: 1931: 1834: 1711: 1675: 1577: 1547: 1459: 1140: 1017: 993: 603: 517: 312: 250: 1925: 478: 3200: 3168: 2841: 2704: 2492: 2228: 2010: 1373: 850: 735: 683: 644: 581: 377: 135: 122: 493: 439: 3430: 3275: 3236: 3049: 2953: 2923: 2860: 2822: 2731: 2680: 2672: 2631: 2623: 2615: 2567: 2560: 2471: 2306: 2179:

do is to move most of the detail from the Legislation section to the daughter article.

2082: 2031: 1921: 1772: 1638: 1507: 1429: 1300: 1253: 1127: 1074: 801: 595: 474: 348: 327: 282: 228: 188: 153: 47: 17: 3461: 3085: 2740: 2667: 2619: 2600: 1734: 1437: 264: 1704: 3151: 2915: 2500: 1824: 1665: 1634: 1433: 2050:

there are still traces of race separation? Although the article is in past tense (

3453:

principally responsible for ending the policy of Apartheid in White South Africa.

886:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE6D6173BF931A15751C1A966958260

3482: 3435: 3434:

history of South Africa, maybe, but this article deals directly with apartheid.

3271: 3256: 3139: 3120: 3071: 3027: 2995: 2874: 2760: 2645: 2508: 2448: 2385: 2121: 2014: 1968: 1960: 1927: 1904: 1830: 1707: 1671: 1573: 1543: 1455: 1136: 1135:

policies which brought about suffering - just like the U.S., and other nations.

1013: 989: 599: 513: 308: 246: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

486: 3490: 3469: 3443: 3419: 3404: 3382: 3363: 3348: 3302: 3283: 3264: 3244: 3204: 3196: 3185: 3128: 3093: 3079: 3057: 3035: 3012: 3003: 2957: 2931: 2882: 2864: 2848: 2837: 2830: 2803: 2768: 2748: 2708: 2700: 2684: 2653: 2635: 2608: 2575: 2516: 2479: 2436: 2413: 2393: 2314: 2296: 2275: 2255: 2232: 2224: 2217: 2202: 2188: 2172: 2149: 2146: 2139: 2129: 2067: 2039: 2022: 1996: 1976: 1935: 1878: 1848: 1780: 1742: 1715: 1679: 1646: 1581: 1555: 1515: 1484: 1463: 1440: 1422: 1403: 1377: 1369: 1343: 1308: 1261: 1242: 1199: 1144: 1105: 1082: 1046: 1021: 997: 971: 953: 932: 917: 897: 878: 854: 846: 835: 809: 774: 754: 739: 731: 723: 687: 679: 670: 648: 640: 631: 607: 585: 577: 568: 539: 521: 454: 381: 373: 361: 335: 316: 290: 272: 254: 236: 161: 143: 126: 118: 111: 441: 3115: 2949: 2856: 2696: 2676: 2627: 2595: 459: 430: 426: 355: 303: 938:

It's a title. If any change is to be made, "under" should be capitalized.

1054:

So include, using verifiable sources, the "acclomplishments" of apartheid.

1912: 1911:

section it does make mention that it was one of the closing wars of the

300:

Here's a nice little reference I scared up with a quick Google search.

2086: 2529:

I gave the entire article multiple tags at the top, and here's why:

2100:

Today there also laws that some consider reverse-Apartheid, such as

791:

didn't think it was benevolent to the blacks. Blacks ought to know.

594:

I think the main issue here is the lack of references as stated by

1917: 326:

Sorry, I'm lost. What exactly is that article supposed to prove?

2599:

discuss and reach consensus before blasting ahead unthinkingly.

444: 434: 2914:

primarily about the development of apartheid, wouldn't it be a

2030:

I don't think anyone has a problem with that (the first one).

1334:

improved quality of life. But then that would be a crime ;) --

25: 1616:

not be hard. You can probably find one in this very article.

2666:

You understand you're going against the guidelines, right?

1480:

Communism in South Africa today? Prove this fact, please.--

414:). Google return 239 hits just on the ANC's website alone ( 187:

insure that whites got the most of "their" tax money back.

2855:

I'm fine with the proposed "Apartheid in South Africa". --

2105: 1126:

is talking about "the "acclomplishments" of apartheid.",

1865:

Here in the UK, white South Africans get stereotyped as

908:

Shouldn't the title be "South Africa under Apartheid"?--

346:

resources supporting the claims were to be provided. --

3274:

talking about? I'm not sure, and I doubt that he knows!

3150:

As for your own personal Cold War theories - those are

3138:

Any reader of the current article who is interested in

2109: 923:

I don't see why; apartheid isn't normally capitalized.

433:

regime take control and there was strong backing from

117:

totally agree, incredibly long, not synthetic at all--

1598:

You need to make sure that the source achieves WP:RS.

1633:

I can't tell by looking at the site whether it is a

2759:What about "Apartheid in South Africa"? Pros/Cons? 2465:

Does it always have to be 'Apartheid South Africa'?

2442:

Does it always have to be 'Apartheid South Africa'?

2075:Apartheid was a system of legal racial segregation 3397:c) Do not add material until consensus is reached 412:a bit of automatically loses a bit of credibility 3292:Ons vir jou Suid-Afrika/At Thy will South Africa 3158:Material on Smuts could be relevant if cited. 2739:, primarily for the reasons Zaian has stated. 2566:The tags are either unnecessary or redundant. 3372:local and international news and information 8: 2422:excuse for apartheid and has no place here. 2261:Effects of the dissolution of the Apartheid? 2507:artist as he was not politically active. -- 458:South Africa there are strong overtones of 429:, many of the participants wanted to see a 416:"anti- apartheid struggle" site:anc.org.za 3394:b) refrain from vandalizing this talkpage 1637:or not. It doesn't appear to be, though. 3308:(moved from talkpage/left there by IP) 2984:or to be more specific it could called 986:Racial segregation in the United States 2441: 404:Congress of South African Trade Unions 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2895:Supposing we change the name to that; 1295:if it was such a brilliant education? 7: 900:concerned about lack of objectivity 881:concerned about lack of objectivity 2978:History of South Africa (1948-1994) 2974:History of South Africa (1910–1948) 2525:Tagged entire article/Here's why... 3165:(as noted in Che's legacy section) 821:content until some sources are up. 24: 2366:And, even the Knowledge article " 2193:I agree with the action taken.--- 29: 2908:history of South Africa 1948-94 1698:I am in no way speaking of the 3470:10:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 3444:00:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 3420:21:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 3405:20:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 3383:20:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 3364:19:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 3349:19:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 3303:18:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 2499:since the context demands it, 1441:15:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1423:14:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1378:07:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 500:...google for more if you want 1: 3284:21:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 3265:01:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 3245:10:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 3205:21:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 3186:19:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 3129:17:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 2576:22:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 2233:20:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 2218:16:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 2203:22:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 2189:17:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 2173:16:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC) 2150:03:11, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 2040:17:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 2023:01:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 1083:16:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 898:16:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 879:12:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC) 855:06:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC) 836:19:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 540:07:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 425:was not a clearcut fight for 421:One should remember that the 400:South African Communist Party 336:18:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 317:17:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 291:16:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 273:15:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 255:12:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 162:21:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 144:21:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 2787:USA during/under segregation 2140:16:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 2130:16:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 2068:15:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 1694:By the way - in speaking of 127:16:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 3491:17:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 3094:09:07, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 3080:20:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 3058:17:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 3036:15:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 3013:20:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 3004:20:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2958:17:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2932:16:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2883:16:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2865:00:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2849:09:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 2831:00:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2804:19:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2769:19:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2749:17:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2709:06:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2685:03:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2654:03:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2636:22:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 2609:20:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1047:15:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 1022:15:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 972:18:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 954:17:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 810:16:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 775:17:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 307:Sorry; I forgot to sign. - 237:22:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 3506: 2315:23:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2297:23:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2276:00:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 2256:09:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 2114:Xenophobia in South Africa 1837:) 16:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 3429:page or perhaps even the 3391:a) Please sign your posts 3312:At Thy Will South Africa: 2986:Apartheid in South Africa 2920:Apartheid in South Africa 2791:Apartheid in South Africa 2561:16:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 2517:13:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2480:21:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2457:21:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 2437:15:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 2414:11:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 2073:From the article itself: 1572:Sorry, I forgot to sign; 1464:23:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 1262:11:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 1106:05:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 933:02:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 918:22:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 755:06:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC) 740:20:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 724:18:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC) 688:18:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 671:15:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 649:13:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 632:12:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 608:08:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 586:07:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 569:05:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 522:07:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC) 498:African National Congress 396:African National Congress 382:20:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC) 362:17:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 112:13:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC) 3402:Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 3361:Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 3300:Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 3290:Adding of YouTube-video 3111:South African Border War 2836:I agree with BillMasen. 2394:22:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1997:05:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 1977:17:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 1936:17:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 1909:South African Border War 1879:14:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 1849:14:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 1781:10:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 1743:18:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 1716:16:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 1680:16:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 1647:11:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 1582:17:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1556:01:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1516:00:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1485:00:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 1404:16:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 1344:05:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 1309:18:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 1243:05:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 1200:05:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 1145:02:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 998:01:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 2994:Any thoughts or ideas? 2737:South African apartheid 639:found to support this. 423:anti-apartheid struggle 341:More references, please 3476:Presidency of De Klerk 3460:Clear case of spam :) 2783:Segregation in the USA 2524: 2497:Apartheid South Africa 2079:amongst the population 3427:Afrikaner nationalism 3167:, is also fitting. 2368:Crime in South Africa 42:of past discussions. 2785:sounds better than 2503:however was just a 2495:was a performer in 2158:Article improvement 1506:page to sound off. 1428:solution is always 1122:I don't think that 657:User:Adi Schlebusch 618:User:Adi Schlebusch 555:User:Adi Schlebusch 532:Irish South African 408:Tripartite Alliance 170:"inferior services" 2816:Spain under Franco 2102:Affirmative action 904:Slight name change 452:Even today in the 3412:Dupont och Dupond 3335:comment added by 2717:User:Bezuidenhout 2618:and particularly 2287:comment added by 1559: 1542:comment added by 1366:User:Bezuidenhout 1360:"Accomplishments" 956: 944:comment added by 777: 765:comment added by 759:Conservative :( 673: 634: 571: 507:African socialism 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3497: 3351: 3178: 3173: 2299: 2045:Apartheid TODAY? 1558: 1536: 964:Thomas.macmillan 939: 910:Thomas.macmillan 760: 664: 625: 562: 358: 351: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3505: 3504: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3478: 3330: 3295: 3174: 3169: 3106: 2980:and one called 2846: 2789:. And at least 2593: 2584: 2527: 2493:Pieter-Dirk Uys 2444: 2282: 2263: 2160: 2047: 2011:2 Squadron SAAF 1700:Accomplishments 1696:Accomplishments 1537: 1392:under apartheid 1362: 1034: 906: 547: 443:and the former 369: 356: 349: 343: 172: 100: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3503: 3501: 3477: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3447: 3446: 3431:Anglo-Boer War 3408: 3407: 3398: 3395: 3392: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3353: 3352: 3326: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3294: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3252: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3218: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3189: 3188: 3105: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 2992: 2988: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2868: 2867: 2852: 2851: 2842: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2725: 2724: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2639: 2638: 2592: 2589: 2583: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2537: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2468: 2443: 2440: 2406:196.207.35.246 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2262: 2259: 2244: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2142: 2117: 2098: 2083:discrimination 2081:is just that, 2046: 2043: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1922:Nelson Mandela 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1852: 1851: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1769: 1765: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1436:, and such. -- 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1296: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 977: 976: 975: 974: 936: 935: 925:Carl.bunderson 905: 902: 871:130.54.130.245 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 825: 824: 823: 822: 815: 814: 813: 812: 795: 794: 793: 792: 747:Adi Schlebusch 743: 742: 716:Adi Schlebusch 691: 690: 652: 651: 613: 612: 611: 610: 589: 588: 546: 543: 525: 524: 510: 502: 469: 468: 450: 419: 368: 365: 342: 339: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 305: 301: 278: 277: 276: 275: 242: 241: 240: 239: 222: 221: 220: 219: 206:Adi Schlebusch 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 171: 168: 167: 166: 165: 164: 147: 146: 130: 129: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 18:Talk:Apartheid 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3502: 3493: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3458: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3406: 3403: 3399: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3389: 3384: 3381: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3365: 3362: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3327: 3324: 3321: 3320: 3313: 3310: 3309: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3301: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3222: 3219: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3177: 3172: 3166: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3103: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3014: 3011: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2845: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2819: 2817: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2733: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2723:) 23 Aug 2009 2722: 2718: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2669: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2597: 2590: 2588: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2538: 2536: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2505:South African 2502: 2498: 2494: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2425: 2421: 2416: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2260: 2258: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2248:169.202.5.106 2234: 2230: 2226: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2157: 2151: 2148: 2143: 2141: 2138: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2118: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060:92.229.133.36 2057: 2055: 2044: 2042: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1926: 1923: 1919: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1888: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1826: 1820: 1819: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1359: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1064:leader" part? 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1031: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 999: 995: 991: 987: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 973: 969: 965: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 955: 951: 947: 946:66.229.233.34 943: 934: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 903: 901: 899: 895: 891: 887: 882: 880: 876: 872: 866: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 833: 829: 819: 818: 817: 816: 811: 807: 803: 799: 798: 797: 796: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 778: 776: 772: 768: 767:66.229.233.34 764: 757: 756: 752: 748: 741: 737: 733: 728: 727: 726: 725: 721: 717: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 689: 685: 681: 676: 675: 674: 672: 669:was added at 668: 662: 658: 650: 646: 642: 637: 636: 635: 633: 630:was added at 629: 623: 619: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 583: 579: 574: 573: 572: 570: 567:was added at 566: 560: 556: 551: 544: 542: 541: 537: 533: 528: 523: 519: 515: 511: 509: 508: 503: 501: 499: 495: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 471: 470: 467: 465: 463: 461: 457: 456: 451: 448: 446: 442: 440: 438: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 386: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 366: 364: 363: 360: 359: 353: 352: 340: 338: 337: 333: 329: 318: 314: 310: 306: 304: 302: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 274: 270: 266: 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252: 248: 238: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 211: 207: 194: 190: 185: 184: 183: 182: 181: 180: 179: 175: 169: 163: 159: 155: 151: 150: 149: 148: 145: 141: 137: 132: 131: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 114: 113: 109: 105: 97: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3479: 3409: 3370: 3311: 3296: 3291: 3253: 3220: 3175: 3170: 3164: 3159: 3155: 3147: 3143: 3135: 3107: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2918:next to the 2916:content fork 2911: 2843: 2820: 2812: 2796:Bezuidenhout 2790: 2786: 2782: 2736: 2693: 2594: 2585: 2551: 2528: 2504: 2501:Anton Goosen 2496: 2464: 2445: 2423: 2419: 2417: 2402: 2289:24.177.3.120 2279: 2268:Mortician103 2264: 2243: 2161: 2116:for details. 2094: 2078: 2074: 2053: 2051: 2048: 2029: 1989:Bezuidenhout 1958: 1871:Bezuidenhout 1866: 1841:Bezuidenhout 1825:South Africa 1821: 1699: 1695: 1666:South Africa 1635:vanity press 1415:Bezuidenhout 1396:Bezuidenhout 1391: 1388:South Africa 1387: 1363: 1336:Bezuidenhout 1235:Bezuidenhout 1229: 1192:Bezuidenhout 1132:Bezuidenhout 1124:Bezuidenhout 1098:Bezuidenhout 1039:Bezuidenhout 1035: 937: 907: 890:202.71.92.74 883: 867: 863: 826: 788: 779: 758: 744: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 653: 614: 552: 548: 529: 526: 504: 472: 453: 422: 415: 411: 391: 387: 372:credibility. 370: 354: 347: 344: 325: 279: 243: 202: 176: 173: 104:79.160.97.59 101: 78: 43: 37: 3337:87.103.53.1 3331:—Preceding 3140:Che Guevara 2591:Name Change 2553:Seb az86556 2429:Seb az86556 2420:post-mortem 2384:the case." 2283:—Preceding 2210:Itsmejudith 2195:PJHaseldine 2181:Itsmejudith 2165:Itsmejudith 1905:Che Guevara 1538:—Preceding 1233:returned.-- 940:—Preceding 761:—Preceding 665:—Preceding 626:—Preceding 563:—Preceding 487:ANC website 483:ANC website 479:ANC website 475:ANC website 473:Some refs: 36:This is an 3104:UN Section 2903:apartheid? 2814:the title 2794:dispute.-- 2582:Television 2052:Apartheid 1032:Too Hidden 545:Propaganda 505:Also see: 455:democratic 367:"Struggle" 136:MartinezMD 98:Summary??! 3276:Vandagard 3237:BillMasen 3116:Jan Smuts 3050:BillMasen 2982:Apartheid 2924:BillMasen 2922:article? 2823:BillMasen 2697:Apartheid 2596:User:UKER 2568:Vandagard 2541:WP:COMMON 2535:WP:VERIFY 2472:BillMasen 2307:BillMasen 2091:townships 2032:BillMasen 1773:BillMasen 1639:BillMasen 1508:BillMasen 1301:BillMasen 1254:BillMasen 1230:political 1128:BillMasen 1075:BillMasen 828:Gregie156 802:BillMasen 781:respect. 576:decades. 460:socialism 431:communist 427:democracy 328:BillMasen 283:BillMasen 229:BillMasen 189:BillMasen 154:Vandagard 90:Archive 9 85:Archive 8 79:Archive 7 73:Archive 6 68:Archive 5 60:Archive 1 3462:Greenman 3345:contribs 3333:unsigned 3270:What is 3134:Invmog, 3086:Greenman 2741:Greenman 2601:Greenman 2424:However, 2285:unsigned 1913:Cold War 1768:article. 1735:Greenman 1552:contribs 1540:unsigned 1438:jpgordon 942:unsigned 763:unsigned 402:and the 392:struggle 388:Struggle 265:Greenman 3176:thoreau 2906:3) If " 2899:things. 2732:WP:BOLD 2673:WP:DRNC 2624:WP:DRNC 2616:WP:BOLD 1430:WP:NPOV 667:comment 628:comment 565:comment 494:RSA DOJ 491:RSA Gov 39:archive 3483:Invmog 3436:Invmog 3272:Invmog 3257:Invmog 3121:Invmog 3072:Invmog 3028:Invmog 2996:Invmog 2875:Invmog 2761:Invmog 2730:UKER, 2668:WP:BRD 2646:Invmog 2620:WP:BRD 2509:NJR_ZA 2449:Invmog 2386:Invmog 2147:Jayjg 2122:NJR_ZA 2106:News24 2087:racism 2015:Invmog 1969:Invmog 1961:Invmog 1928:Invmog 1867:racist 1831:Invmog 1708:Invmog 1672:Invmog 1574:Invmog 1544:Invmog 1456:Invmog 1137:Invmog 1014:Invmog 990:Invmog 787:Well, 600:NJR ZA 596:Wolfie 514:NJR ZA 496:, the 406:. The 398:, the 394:, the 350:Wolfie 309:Invmog 247:Prof 7 3197:Zaian 3152:Wp:OR 2838:Wizzy 2701:Zaian 2225:Zaian 2095:white 1918:Lenin 1829:] ::: 1670:] ::: 1434:WP:RS 1370:Zaian 1364:Wow, 847:Zaian 732:Zaian 680:Zaian 641:Zaian 578:Zaian 119:afa86 16:< 3487:talk 3466:talk 3440:talk 3416:talk 3341:talk 3280:talk 3261:talk 3241:talk 3201:talk 3184:)RT 3182:talk 3125:talk 3090:talk 3076:talk 3054:talk 3032:talk 3000:talk 2954:talk 2950:uKER 2928:talk 2879:talk 2861:talk 2857:uKER 2827:talk 2800:talk 2765:talk 2745:talk 2721:talk 2705:talk 2681:talk 2677:uKER 2675:. -- 2650:talk 2632:talk 2628:uKER 2626:. -- 2605:talk 2572:talk 2557:talk 2513:talk 2476:talk 2453:talk 2433:talk 2410:talk 2390:talk 2311:talk 2293:talk 2272:talk 2252:talk 2229:talk 2214:talk 2199:talk 2185:talk 2169:talk 2126:talk 2064:talk 2036:talk 2019:talk 1993:talk 1973:talk 1965:talk 1932:talk 1875:talk 1845:talk 1835:talk 1777:talk 1739:talk 1712:talk 1676:talk 1643:talk 1578:talk 1548:talk 1512:talk 1460:talk 1419:talk 1400:talk 1390:was 1374:talk 1340:talk 1305:talk 1258:talk 1239:talk 1196:talk 1141:talk 1102:talk 1079:talk 1043:talk 1018:talk 994:talk 968:talk 950:talk 929:talk 914:talk 894:talk 875:talk 851:talk 832:talk 806:talk 789:they 771:talk 751:talk 736:talk 720:talk 684:talk 661:talk 645:talk 622:talk 604:talk 582:talk 559:talk 536:talk 518:talk 445:USSR 435:Cuba 378:talk 374:Lyle 332:talk 313:talk 287:talk 269:talk 251:talk 233:talk 210:talk 193:talk 158:talk 152:Qué! 140:talk 123:talk 108:talk 3171:Red 3160:(5) 3156:(4) 3148:(3) 3144:(2) 3136:(1) 2912:was 2110:IOL 2108:or 2085:or 2056:... 2054:was 663:) 624:) 561:) 357:Inu 3489:) 3468:) 3442:) 3418:) 3380:TM 3347:) 3343:• 3282:) 3263:) 3243:) 3203:) 3127:) 3092:) 3078:) 3056:) 3034:) 3010:TM 3002:) 2956:) 2930:) 2910:" 2881:) 2863:) 2829:) 2802:) 2767:) 2747:) 2707:) 2683:) 2652:) 2634:) 2607:) 2574:) 2559:) 2515:) 2478:) 2455:) 2435:) 2412:) 2392:) 2313:) 2295:) 2274:) 2254:) 2231:) 2216:) 2201:) 2187:) 2171:) 2137:PR 2128:) 2066:) 2038:) 2021:) 1995:) 1975:) 1934:) 1877:) 1847:) 1839:-- 1779:) 1741:) 1714:) 1706:) 1678:) 1645:) 1580:) 1554:) 1550:• 1514:) 1482:TM 1462:) 1432:, 1421:) 1402:) 1376:) 1342:) 1307:) 1260:) 1241:) 1198:) 1143:) 1104:) 1081:) 1045:) 1020:) 996:) 970:) 952:) 931:) 916:) 896:) 888:. 877:) 853:) 834:) 808:) 773:) 753:) 738:) 722:) 686:) 647:) 606:) 584:) 538:) 520:) 512:-- 489:, 485:, 481:, 477:, 418:). 380:) 334:) 315:) 289:) 271:) 253:) 235:) 212:) 160:) 142:) 134:-- 125:) 110:) 64:← 3485:( 3464:( 3438:( 3414:( 3339:( 3278:( 3259:( 3239:( 3199:( 3180:( 3123:( 3088:( 3074:( 3052:( 3030:( 2998:( 2972:' 2952:( 2926:( 2877:( 2859:( 2844:☎ 2840:… 2825:( 2798:( 2763:( 2743:( 2719:( 2703:( 2679:( 2648:( 2630:( 2603:( 2570:( 2555:( 2511:( 2474:( 2451:( 2431:( 2408:( 2388:( 2309:( 2291:( 2270:( 2250:( 2227:( 2212:( 2197:( 2183:( 2167:( 2124:( 2062:( 2034:( 2017:( 1991:( 1971:( 1963:( 1930:( 1873:( 1843:( 1833:( 1775:( 1737:( 1710:( 1674:( 1641:( 1576:( 1546:( 1510:( 1458:( 1417:( 1398:( 1372:( 1338:( 1303:( 1256:( 1237:( 1194:( 1139:( 1100:( 1077:( 1041:( 1016:( 992:( 966:( 948:( 927:( 912:( 892:( 873:( 849:( 830:( 804:( 769:( 749:( 734:( 718:( 682:( 659:( 643:( 620:( 602:( 580:( 557:( 534:( 516:( 449:. 376:( 330:( 311:( 285:( 267:( 249:( 231:( 208:( 195:) 191:( 156:( 138:( 121:( 106:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.