2775:
to be notable aspects of the film's pre-production process, as they come in somewhat arbitrarily. Mark
Ruffalo tweeting that he'd be back in March 2013 and Deadline confirming that Evans would be back in an article about a different film seem irrelevant to this film's production. It's not as though those actors signed new contracts around those dates or that their commitment to the film changed on those dates. And we're bound to have another half-dozen or so of these types of "confirmations". It seems to me that including those actors in the cast section with those references is enough.
3790:, but it did seem quite intriguing. These actors will not be added until we all come to a conclusion of whether or not this source is reliable enough to back up these casting additions. Looking at previous trends on this talk page, I see that some think we are a news site. We are in fact not and have no deadline whatsoever. Once we all come up with a decision that best suits the cause, we can move from there. To all users involved with this article, here is the source. Be sure to analyze it as best you can.
3289:"Commonly called" isn't very good since it doesn't distinguish it as informal. "Colloquially called" is a bit better, but I still don't like it. Maybe "sometimes colloquially called". Ideally however we could just make it clear in the lead that it's the second film in the series without calling it "The Avengers 2". Everybody knows that all the colloquial title means anyway. And once full on promotion with the official title starts it really won't be needed. --
31:
4343:
3724:
2050:
3058:
likely being used informally. The makers of the film made a choice not to have "2" be in the official title and we should respect that. That goes for all the Marvel sequel articles doing this. I can't think of any other sequel articles on
Knowledge that does this kind of thing. That's because we flat out say it's the sequel in the lead. People aren't stupid, they'll figure it out. --
4146:
4027:
3648:
2008:
4388:
3924:
2100:
2632:
such things. What's more likely - IGN is privy to information a source like
Deadline isn't and Marvel has not yet made public, or IGN, assuming as we all do that the entire cast will return, listed Hemsworth with other actors confirmed to return without double checking their sources? I'm inclined to believe the latter.
2774:
Just wondering. Do we consider it necessary to note every time an actor from the first film's return is confirmed in the pre-production section? It's good to have those references and wait until that confirmation before adding them to the cast section of the page. But these confirmations don't appear
2512:
I agree, I find it strange, especially as there have been reports that
Hemsworth was in two minds about signing up, that Marvel wouldn't unveil it in a press release, or at least a joint one for Chris Evans too, seen as they are the leads, instead of just having it as a small add on of the casting of
2287:
They're just shortening it even when they go out of their way to refer to the first film by its full name every single time? No, I'm not buying it. That James Spader press release and the different ways they wrote the two films' titles pretty much settled it for me. I can wait, but how many more does
2257:
Yeah, I almost made this an actual request move (still might eventually). It just seems to me "Avengers: Age of Ultron" is by far the common name, at least when it comes to official sources, and that the guy who wrote that first announcement probably just screwed up since it's the only time it's ever
2242:
Hmm. Definitely something to look into. I wouldn't be too rash at the moment, as we will still be getting more press info officially from Marvel. I would say look to third party sources, but their stylings are all different across the board, so they aren't much help. I do see what you are saying, and
1910:
With the recent additions of
Hemsworth and Taylor, it seems some sources are playing fast and loose with their information. We should scrutinize these more before adding them to the article. It would seem, especially in the case of Taylor, that the trades would pick this up not a passing mention on a
860:
Didn't work. Got "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reason: The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid. Please choose another name, or use
Requested moves to ask an administrator to help you with the move. Do
490:
There is no 25 reference rule just something we used in the past but I'm beginning to think we can afford to wait for more considering the media attention this film is getting and the fact that we're still a year away from when filming is scheduled to begin. Although the media attention might make it
3978:
The scans more than likely would be used for rendering a CGI model based on Spader's appearance. This model could be animated through the motion capture process or rendered traditionally in post-production, we don't know. The
Hollywood Reporter article even says "Mystery still surrounds exactly what
3072:
Its not just for readers who came here through the redirect but for readers that are already here yet the when they check the source theres no evidence of 'Age of Ultron'. Also we are respecting the filmmakers but also the common vernacular where it is still very much being used. Sequel could be any
2631:
Here's the thing. The news article is about Spader, not
Hemsworth, so Hemsworth's involvement being confirmed in an article about Spader is highly irregular. This is especially so when the sources talking about Hemsworth's involvement are not only few but not among the sources that typically confirm
1840:
The source for
Scarlett Johansson is not reliable. It just assumes that she will be back, it never contains any information saying that she will definitely be in it. This article obviously just assumes that all cast from the first film will return for the second. A better source is needed before she
1529:
Why are you stuck on the word "confirm"? Flemming made a definitive statement; "I’ve heard Evans plans to direct the movie this fall, completing production before he picks up his shield to play
Captain America in The Avengers: Age Of Ultron." In other words; Before Chris Evans picks up his shield to
3671:
After reading the article, it appears that they have new information that nobody else is yet privy to, because of the use of the word "exclusive". The problem is that author then fails to follow it up with how he received this information and precedes directly into giving some backstory about Olsen
2856:
On second thought, I don't it is notable to simply include a report in the production section that we determine is reliable. After all, they could have been cast months earlier. We should only include the report if it pinpoints the timeframe when the actors were brought onboard or makes an official
2563:
I don't understand what you mean by "synthesis" here, but, if these sources do in fact confirm Hemsworth's involvement, it would be entirely different from the confirmation of every other actor that's appeared in a recent Marvel movie. While not all come from press statements Marvel releases to the
2460:
Also, regarding Rusted AutoParts' initial objection, the issue wasn't the article, but the interpretation of the article. Saying Olsen has the acting chops to hang with someone like Hemsworth is not a confirmation that Hemsworth is in the movie. It's that difficult to expand the article because the
1890:
Plus since on Deadline or Collider (not sure which, but I've definitely seen it) there has been a video interview with Evans where he confirms that he is returning, but this MTV article for Scarlett Johansson is mainly about Scarlet Witch, and, as I have mentioned previously, they are just assuming
92:
This just seems like a typical non-answer from someone trying to dodge a question. I don't think it really enhances anyone's understanding of the film's development, or adds anything to the article. It seems to me like it's enough to note that EW reported that the character will be in the film, and
3057:
The very fact that "The Avengers 2" takes them here should be a pretty big red flag that they've found the right article. So I gotta agree that it serves no purpose in the hatnote. Nor do I think it should be in the lead or anywhere else in the article except for direct quotes where it's more than
2539:
I understand both of your concerns Frog and Waffle, but the wording is acceptable and usable in this case. It is not like previously, where news outlets were using synthesis on their parts, saying actors would return. As far as I know, all signings/confirmations are not always done through a press
1544:
Again, what matters is why did Flemming choose to prequalify his statement with "I've heard" as if to remove any responsibility for making it. Yes, it could be just his writing style but who knows or he could be saying that the information comes from an unofficial source. Though if the information
3355:
That's why I said clarify. I would agree that right now simply calling it a sequel in the article is not clear. And that's all someone using "The Avengers 2" colloquially means anyway. That it's the second Avengers. I don't see the need to make it match exactly with publications who are also just
2619:
Here's the thing. The news article is specifically about Spader. And they also mentioned the returning actors that have already been confirmed. Downey, Evans, Ruffalo and Jackson. Hemsworth was in that group too, with Johansson and Renner still unmentioned (I'm certain Johansson is confirmed, but
2425:
I believe that IGN and Variety are both using something else from Marvel for their confirmation, because the IGN source states: "Marvel Studios made the announcement today, adding that Chris Evans and Chris Hemsworth will also reprise their roles as Captain America and Thor, respectively, for the
2945:
They might not be aware of it... but the hatnote is still not serving a purpose. It doesn't distinguish anything. Your argument that "they might not know The Avengers Age of Ultron is the same film" doesn't make sense, because the hatnote is totally unrelated to that. It's just telling you that
1745:
I had placed this information in the article figuring that Ronan's statement regarding the rumors lent some level of credence to them. That was a bit of a fine line and upon consideration, one that should have required more patience on my part for a formal casting announcement. Chalk it up to
4049:@TriiipleThreat why didn't you use that article (The Huffington post article) as a reference instead of the Hollywood Reporter link? It seems like the HuffPost link, with Fieges comments, give a more detailed description of what they're going to do with Ultron/Spader. Just my two cents. lol
2491:
But am I the only one that finds it suspect that Hemsworth's involvement in the film, especially given that he's one of the main characters, would be "confirmed" by being buried at the end of a story that has nothing to do with him? Also taking into consideration that Marvel released a press
1955:
I am fine with this, if others are. I agree with you Frog (and Triiiple), that it seems many news sites are just jumping on the fact that since it is mentioned that Black Widow is back, so is Johansson, as well as all the previous characters in the last film. As such, I believe that would be
3234:
article and see how often "Star Trek 2" shows up, but it's not in the lead there either. If for whatever reason we do decide to put "The Avengers 2" in the lead on this article it needs to be made clear it's an informal title only and in no way official, no matter how "common" it is. But it
222:
It's my understanding that they both own the rights to both names, but that they each can only reference certain aspects of the character's history. It is probably worth mentioning, but only when we have reliable sources indicating the specifics of how this influences his role in this film.
1252:
Hmm. I see your point. You are correct that most people searching for this film, may just quickly type Age of Ultron. Also, by having it here, as it is right on top, people may think the film and comic storylines are similar. I believe I added it when the subtitle was first announced, as a
3025:
until then. So, as TriiipleThreat stated, an uninformed reader comes here to search "The Avengers 2" and gets taken to this page, would not know they are the same. And we can't assume they'd stay on the page long enough to see in the second sentence of the lead, "intended sequel to
2930:
Thats because you are aware of what you are looking for. If there are published articles that only refer to the film as The Avengers 2, an uninformed reader might not be aware that The Avengers: Age of Ultron is the same film. Sidenote: the project page discussion has been
2527:
Frog, it seems it's just you and Waffle that have the issue with this. I mean, a source says that they're returning, you immediately question it and remove it. Are you expecting some sort of formal confirmation from Hemsworth or Johansson? Also, they're under contract.
300:
My understanding was similar to Fandraltastic's: that Marvel was allowed to use the character as long as they didn't reference Magneto or that he was a "mutant". That's why I brought it up. But as everyone is saying, we will have to wait until more info is known for
2205:
and how the first film is always listed as "Marvel's The Avengers" while the new one is always just "Avengers: Age of Ultron". If it does say Marvel's it's always outside the quote marks, unlike the first film which always has it inside the marks. Same with the new
4277:
Actually what we go by is the billing block on the film poster or the end credits. However, if a film has neither of these we can base it on previous films in a series or as you say in chronological order of confirmation. In this case its a mix of the latter
3711:- Thank you. It seems as though an official announcement is close, because of the shooting date(s) (ScarJo says January 2014, and Chris Evans and Sam Jackson have said March 2014). They may even appear at NYCC, but it's unconfirmed, but would be really cool.
919:
article, but I wasn't sure if I should add this information to the "Cast" section of this article or not. It is news about this film, but it's news of something not happening. It's not a black-or-white include or not-include situation. What do you think?
1726:
Agree. If we did include this rumor, then we are essentially saying, let's allow all rumors on to the page. If she is eventually brought on for the role, we can add a bit on how she was widely considered for the part before getting it, if necessary. -
1856:
It's a report. If she isn't returning, they wouldn't say "Scarlett Johansson's Black Widow". Chris Evans source is something I question ,yet it remains. For now, let's just leave Evans and Johansson be, as more sources will definetly be on the way.
2572:
that then writes the article about the actor's involvement. Marvel confirming an actor's involvement in a film by just including his name at the very bottom of an article or press release that has nothing to do with that actor is so far unheard
4210:
I agree with TriiipleThreat. It helps to provide basic descriptions here so readers do not have to go elsewhere for clarification. I would think that knowledgeable readers can get through such descriptions easily to get to content new to them.
2453:
Wait, is IGN actually considered a reputable source? The Variety article is the only one that seems to work, but that they are the only one that seems to make any mention of Hemsworth returning might indicate an error on their part. I like the
2226:
announcing the title (although even the title of that article gives it without the "The"), but all the ones after that are different. I really think we need to change it to what the more recent ones show. No "Marvel's" and definitely no "The".
2272:
I don't think it was a screw up, because to me, it seems that they are just shortening it. Again, let's just wait to see what else Marvel gives us, and (cautiously) third party sources. We still have less than two years until this releases. -
2741:
Yes, the E! source does settle it, but I don't know where you are believing IGN is unreliable. They are perfectly reliable for news information, especially for info used in pages like this. And if they report on a rumor, they state that. -
817:
Can we not just use the drop down arrow, select "Move", then in the selection to where to move it, select "Article" and put the name (as where we want to move is just a redirect)? Won't that move the page history and talk page with it? -
1706:
As stated in the sources, this appears only to be rumor at this point. Unfortunately, these types of films are prone to rumor and speculation. Some pick up traction in the press and a few are even addressed by those involved. However,
199:
It doesn't mean anything for Avengers, Fox owns the rights to Quicksilver, Marvel owns the rights to Pietro Maximoff, neither can refer to him by the other name. They were saying this back before The Avengers even began production.
1429:
No source has to use the word "confirm", to be considered verifiable. However the information does seem to be based on hearsay due to use of the phrase "I hear". So the questions becomes does the hearsay of reliable source such as
1940:
Can we go ahead and remove Scarlett Johansson from this and the MCU page then, until we get a more reliable source, as it just assumes that she is returning the same way the contact music source assumes all the cast is returning.
2318:
about Elizabeth Olsen's potential involvement. I don't think the source is confirming Hemsworth is involved, they just listed the actors that portrayed the Avengers. If no one can find a better source, I'm taking it off the
1573:
Agree. It reads that Fleming has heard that Evans will direct this film, before appearing in Avengers: AoU, as he previously had not plans for a project before hand. That's how I read it, and think on Fleming meant it. -
2665:
No, I believe what news sources report on needs to be held under some scrutiny. Especially when one news source says something that isn't being reported on much anywhere else. Especially when that one news source is
1389:
This is a very reliable source stating that he will return, and laying out the schedule for his return. Whether or not it comes from his mouth is irrelevant. This is how all film articles have always been handled.
3340:
Agreed, 'known as' could be construed as a title, 'called' is a sobriquet. Also a sequel can be any film in a series, it's not specific enough besides the point is to directly match readers with what is stated in
3073:
film in a series of film so we should be specific, we shouldn't make any assumptions on behalf of the readers. While those familiar with the film might know what we are talking about, those unfamiliar may not.--
2682:
Numerous sources stated Johansson was confirmed to return, yet they were removed, if so many websites were stating a false positive, then they all lose their credibility, something I consider a drastic thought.
1036:
Its more than just a working title, its an everyday title. We use them so when a reliable author or someone affiliated with the film uses the term, readers now what they're talking about. Example: the title for
2426:
sequel." The key is the "adding" immediately after the link of "Marvel Studios made the announcement today" which takes you to the press release, as it means that this info is coming from Marvel themselves. -
3888:"Just this weekend I went in for them to take very extensive photographs, head scans, body scans, and all kinds of things in preparation for figuring out how the hell I’m gonna fit in this Ultron character."
2540:
release like Spader got. Most of the time, it is how it was presented in the IGN or Variety source. To Rusted, they may be under contract, but that does not necessarily mean they will return in this film. -
305:
obviously, but if both studios are going to use the character, it will be interesting to see how they approach this so the general public does not get confused. Just wanted to get the situation out there. -
3843:
The source is titled "Everything We Know About the Next Marvel Team-Up" the problem is that they don't explain how they came to know this information. I'd prefer to wait for something more official to be
2602:
I still find it odd that IGN is considered a valid source since their name is associated with shaky journalistic integrity, but the issue is not that IGN said it, it's that the usual players in this have
681:
are going to be looking for information on this film now, and I think a lot of people are going to try creating articles for it if they don't find one. So I think it should be moved to full article now.
2410:
it doesn't mention anything about Hemsworth, and the Variety article still doesn't have any evidence to back up their claims, it is just new site assumption that the leads will all reprise their roles.
2916:
I gotta agree with Taylor, where else would The Avengers 2 be redirecting? If I type in Isidious 2 I expect to be taken to Insidious Chapter 2, I just can't be bothered typing the whole thing out.
506:
There's also no evidence that The Avengers 2 is the name of the film, given the rest of the films that are subtitled it seems unlikely. If anything it would be moved to United The Avengers Sequel.
3686:
I have always questioned Latino Review's reliability, because they always say they have the "exclusive" but never claim how they got this information, as I know they don't receive exclusives like
158:? Only reason I ask is because of the whole character rights situation, as Fox and Marvel Studios can both use the character, but Marvel can only use it without alluding to "mutants". It has been
2575:
Also, to answer RAP's question, yes, I am expecting some formal confirmation of Hemsworth, Johansson, and every other actor that is involved in this film. It's the standard we've come to expect.
1926:
Agree. This Contact Music source, is one I don't believe to be one to "confirm" the inclusion, only using their assumptions that the same actors will return. It's all in their wording. -
988:, and is still referred to as such by reliable sources for simplicity sake or just to identify with general audiences. Whatever the case maybe, it used enough to warrant inclusion to put
3454:. This franchise has had a third film announced for it, while, as you mentioned, there is actually a Cap II film which could be confusing. I don't even think we have to include the
3274:
For the record: I'd prefer it in the lead over a hatenote and there's plenty of was to distinguish it from official title, such as 'commonly called' or 'colloquially called', etc.--
3569:
Yeah, I was going to say what Triiiple did. I think ThorTDW is the only one to examine to change. Should we move this discussion to that talk page? - 05:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
1378:
It doesn't even say "Evans confirms he will be back". The main focus is his directorial debut. I feel until he or the makers confirm he is indeed in it, he shouldn't be placed in.
3694:, and comic-based sites most of the time. Even if this request was not made, I would have most likely reverted anyways until, like you said, a more reliable source is released. -
3884:
Can we please add this to the article? Spader will be portraying Ultron rather than them using only his voice, he has stated that in September he went in for all types of scans.
3228:"Pirates 2", I even remember TV spots where the voice over guy actually called it that, but it's not in that article's lead. It doesn't need to be. Look at the references on the
3672:
and Taylor-Johnson. So it all comes down to the reputation of Latino Review, which I would say is weakly reliable at best. I wouldn't mind waiting for a more reliable source.--
3436:
I would like to see it (and any other relevant Marvel titles) edited to match this one. I was personally waiting to see if anyone would contest this change before doing it. --
2778:
Downey would be the exception, since he actually did sign a new contract and whether or not he would return was a topic of interest covered by a variety of reliable sources. -
1363:
is confirmation that Evans will be back. I'm a bit strapped for time so if someone else could add it to the article (and other relevant articles) that would be great. Cheers -
560:
would be an acceptable title, as that's what the majority of the press are referring to it as, even though I believe it's likely that Marvel will add a subtitle to the film.
4194:
We have to give the readers at least a very basic description of the characters. We cannot expect that they have seen the other films or much less read the other articles.--
1165:)? Because without the Marvel's would be a more common name when referenced to. (And I'm sure the media will find another way to reference it, such as Avengers: AoU etc.) -
3021:, as well as official stated by Marvel when Downey resigned. Only at Comic-Con did the title change to its official one, but published articles had been referencing it as
1520:
Again, still doesn't mean this is confirmed. All it says is that he's making his directing debut before picking up the shield. There's is not one mention he is confirmed.
3617:
This is not a source, and the dude who wrote the article is only referencing back to his talks with various websites about the character. not an official announcement.
1506:
The headline of Fleming's article unambiguously says Evans is reprising his role in Avengers 2. It doesn't have a rumor or report disclaimer or anything like that.
2477:
IGN is a perfectly reputable source. And whenever info is not confirmed, or still rumor, they have stated as such. As this is not here, I believe it to be fine. -
3591:
are some quotes from Spader. Adding here, because the first set is interesting. Is him talking about the photos and scans and indication that he may actually be
2360:
I know, but this is the fifth time that Johansson has been removed from the list. It's rather annoying if we must wait for a statement from Johansson herself.
4173:
Quick question, the descriptions next to the reoccuring cast like RDJ as Iron Man, are the details necessary since they are basically verbatim from the other
3815:
Screen Crush's source about Taylor-Johnson's casting as Quicksilver comes from Latino Review, which has questionable reliability as noted in this talk page.
3614:
He was not OFFICIALLY announced by anyone at Marvel/The Avengers Cast. He is still in talks to play Quicksilver and is not officially signed on to play him.
2722:
889:
3786:
A recent source has confirmed both Jeremy Renner and Aaron Taylor-Johnson to play Hawkeye and Quicksilver, respectively. Don't know if this is just more of
861:
not manually move the article by copying and pasting it; the page history must be moved along with the article text." I can submit a request to be moved. -
93:
then if they happen to be written out of a later draft we can note that then. But I don't think a "maybe, maybe not, things change!" quote really belongs. -
3224:
3145:
1014:. Including it in the lead is redundant and looks unprofessional. We don't include provisional working titles for other films once titles are known. --
2407:
2207:
2202:
3621:
3303:
How about "also known as"? But I think adding it anywhere would be useless. It says right there that it's the intended sequel to the first Avengers.
1772:
1332:
I just wanted to say that we all seem to be doing a good job formatting our references. However please try to archive your sources as well. I know
2201:
You know, in all the new press releases I've noticed the title is always just "Avengers: Age of Ultron". No "The" and no "Marvel's". Look at the
1891:
that all the cast are returning, hence putting Scarlett Johansson's Black Widow, it never actually gives proper confirmation she has signed on.
1360:
763:
I think so too. I don't really see any fall back from it. We will only just be adding info here, so why not be doing it in the article space? -
3858:
After seeing your view I'd agree that we should wait until an official announcement, perhaps from one involved with the film itself. Thanks. -
3484:
film" instead. Though I'm not sure any edit is really needed at the moment. On the Iron Man articles I would see it as a chance to link to the
2288:
it really take to prove that that's just the title and not a "shortening"? They've consistently not used a "The" outside of that one source. --
1680:
It has been a week since this discussion started. If nobody has anything of substance to add then there is no need to prolong it any further.--
1545:
does come from an unofficial source, it must be trusted enough for him to report it or he would be jeopardizing his journalistic integrating.--
79:
71:
66:
1988:
In this video, Evans confirms he begins shooting A:AOU in March 2014, confirming he has signed on, so can we re-add him to the cast list now?
3315:
3213:
3164:
2993:
2958:
2888:
1841:
can be added to the cast list, otherwise it should just remain in prose that MTV claimed she would return, but that it remains unconfirmed.
1488:
is a reliable source. To me the questions boils down to: Based on the author's language, is the information sufficient for inclusion? Or as
3766:
There is no reliable source out there that states this. All point back to the Latino Review source, with is questionable and unreliable. -
2967:
A bit of a history; that information was in the article lead but editors came to a concensus that it would be better served as a hatnote.--
2084:
362:
2620:
there isn't a source everyone trusts yet). So with that said, it seems Hemsworth is in as of now. And the verdict is still out on Renner.
1559:
Reading it, the "I've heard" part seems to be related to the mention of directing the film rather than about him taking part in Avengers.
159:
1471:
As far as we could know, This is what Fleming is saying. It might not be what Evans, or Whedon or Feige are saying. Get what I'm saying?
1344:
and click "Archive" at the top of the page, enter the url of the source, your email address and hit "Submit". Its that easy. Thank you.--
4096:
4056:
4009:
3630:
3237:
2822:
4371:
4255:
Shouldn't the casting order be from who was confirmed first, to last? That's how it's being molded on CA:TWS, T:TDW, and GOTG pages.
4119:
3956:
3752:
1161:
Yes just saw that. Agree with the redirect templates. But should something be stated, like on The Avengers page, that says (or simply
574:
I think we should wait a little bit longer as well, as I'm sure it will start gain some more media traction. As for the name, I think
374:
4297:
4262:
4128:
3906:
1404:
It's a poor way to do so. It does not say his return is confirmed. The word confirmed is not present, therefore, it's speculative.
2335:
It's getting increasing difficult to enhance the article if every source discussing returning Avengers is immediately thrown out.
1045:
445:
409:
1253:
precaution, but now that they are known to be separate storylines, it may not really have a purpose here. But definitely on the
464:
3541:, it's not needed anywhere else. The hatenote at CTW is sufficient and the titles of the Iron Man films are straight forward.--
652:
Maybe so but copy-paste moves are never the answer. In the future, if consensus is that the article is ready, please request a
433:
397:
1120:
Also, per what's being talked about here, and in the discussion above with Spidey, it should most likely add (commonly called
3787:
611:; if there's a lot of references I think we're alright. Titles can be moved. I think we have enough to go on for an article.
249:
2243:
we can definitely change if needed, but I'm still inclined to err towards the official announcement release for the name. -
2793:
I think so. This film is its own animal. So we should know when each of its participants came aboard, at least publicly.--
2223:
2112:
1452:
1336:
is going through some hardships (donate if you can) but until they go away, it is still a valuable resource in preventing
782:
47:
17:
1777:
did when they first reported that Saoirse Ronan was Marvel's "prototype" for the character. If so, does this make the
1312:
since the 90's, but I'd be willing to bet there's several thousand people at that one show who'd disagree with you. --
706:
I would be in support of a move to the article space, if only to quell any errant attempts at creating the article. -
3931:
The source does not mention how he be portraying Ultron. The scans could be used for a number of different methods.--
2408:
http://marvel.com/news/story/21099/exclusive_avengers_age_of_ultron_casts_james_spader_as_the_films_legendary_villain
3622:
http://latino-review.com/2013/10/exclusive-its-official-aaron-johnson-cast-as-quicksilver-in-avengers-age-of-ultron/
3129:
I disagree, it's used enough in the media and in everyday language to the point it deserves a mention in the lead.--
3087:
Then just change where it says sequel to "second film" or something. "The Avengers 2" is wrong and not necessary. --
3017:
should be added back to the lead, either one. It should stay because it was known since the reveal of the sequel as
2389:
1449:
4220:
3897:
3638:
3187:
Actually there is a hatnote on that page, but that's because there's possible confusion there. There isn't here. --
2921:
1564:
511:
205:
154:
38:
3588:
2591:
Well, IGN is a reliable source, so it's safe to say that we have a valid source, not some small time news agency.
965:
Is this really necessary in the lead? It has a title now, so there is no need to refer to it by the provisional "
3508:
1657:
1448:
I believe that is simply Fleming's "informal" style of writing, as he starts many of his articles like that (Ex.
3515:. And with Thor I don't really see the difference with this article. We would be replacing the "commonly called
4283:
4199:
4175:
4076:
4039:
3984:
3949:
As in what.. give me an example as to how a method other than Motion Capture won't be done with James Spader?
3936:
3863:
3849:
3834:
3805:
3677:
3546:
3383:
3346:
3279:
3235:
definitely doesn't belong as a hatnote if there's no other article to confuse it with. (For example the one at
3178:
3134:
3106:
3078:
2972:
2936:
2907:
2862:
2844:
2798:
2189:
2139:
2120:
2081:
2020:
1916:
1881:
1876:
was merely covering a published story and wouldn't be privy to new information not published in the original.--
1823:
1790:
1716:
1685:
1643:
1550:
1535:
1497:
1439:
1349:
1299:
1242:
1188:
1152:
1102:
1054:
997:
946:
837:
808:
754:
661:
537:
496:
491:
more notable now, it just seems 25 references isn't what it used to be for these types of film. I don't know.--
356:
338:
190:
113:
4000:
3893:
2088:
1818:
Very well, but since THR doesn't independently confirm anything about Ronan, we should leave it out for now.--
1652:
We could just wait until the D23 expo happens. I'd be surprised if they didn't announce a few things there. --
3634:
3222:
I agree. I strongly believe that alternate informal titles belong as redirects only. Plenty of people called
4375:
4349:
4100:
4060:
4013:
3756:
3730:
3512:
3241:
is absolutely fine. It has a purpose because there's another movie actually called "Captain America II".) --
3230:
2826:
2783:
2397:
2056:
1460:
1420:
1395:
1368:
1094:
989:
890:
Knowledge:Requested moves/Technical requests#movereq-Knowledge:Article Incubator/The Avengers: Age of Ultron
678:
228:
131:
98:
3910:
3115:
Which means it has no place in the lead. Otherwise why not list informal alternate titles for every film --
1750:. Hopefully by the time of the San Diego Comic-Con International there will be official word on the role.
3960:
2171:
1653:
1006:
But the numerical was used purely as a placeholder until the title was revealed. We have a redirect from
378:
582:. I think Feige even stated somewhere that he would be "surprised" if it didn't, and he was a fan of how
4400:
4301:
4266:
4158:
4132:
3771:
3699:
3660:
3600:
3467:
3426:
3047:
2917:
2747:
2711:
2684:
2655:
2621:
2592:
2545:
2529:
2482:
2431:
2380:
2361:
2351:
2336:
2278:
2248:
1965:
1931:
1858:
1732:
1671:
1631:
1620:
1579:
1560:
1521:
1472:
1405:
1379:
1262:
1202:
1170:
1133:
897:
866:
851:
823:
790:
768:
732:
711:
591:
507:
311:
201:
171:
2721:
Well, definitely not IGN. But reading a source wrong has no bearing on how reliable it is. Regardless,
1989:
4258:
4238:
4184:
4124:
4092:
4052:
4005:
3952:
3902:
3626:
3538:
3497:
3306:
3204:
3155:
2984:
2949:
2879:
2818:
2732:
2701:
2673:
2639:
2610:
2581:
2518:
2503:
2467:
2416:
2346:
I believe one has been added, the USA Today source. If not, the IGN article on Spader confirms it. -
2325:
2167:
1996:
1946:
1896:
1846:
1755:
1317:
1039:
548:
521:
449:
413:
2392:
confirms Hemsworth will be back in their Spader story, that's probably a stronger source than IGN. -
4279:
4195:
4120:
http://www.thewrap.com/aaron-taylor-johnson-closes-deal-join-marvels-avengers-age-ultron-exclusive/
4072:
4035:
3980:
3932:
3859:
3845:
3830:
3820:
3801:
3673:
3542:
3379:
3342:
3275:
3174:
3130:
3102:
3074:
2968:
2946:
something redirects here - not that "The Avengers 2" is the same as "The Avengers: Age of Ultron."
2932:
2903:
2858:
2840:
2794:
2654:
So basically, you believe news sites aren't allowed to state whether or not an actor is returning?
2185:
2150:
2116:
2016:
1979:
1912:
1877:
1819:
1809:
1786:
1782:
1712:
1681:
1639:
1546:
1531:
1511:
1493:
1435:
1345:
1295:
1280:
1238:
1184:
1148:
1144:
1098:
1068:
1050:
1019:
993:
974:
942:
928:
833:
804:
750:
690:
657:
617:
565:
533:
492:
478:
437:
427:
391:
352:
334:
272:
186:
109:
2211:
2779:
2406:
If you actually read the source that IGN has got it's information from, as cited in the article,
2393:
1872:
was doing there own reporting on Evans and could easily find out additional information, whereas
1489:
1456:
1416:
1391:
1364:
1284:
224:
127:
94:
4404:
4379:
4325:
4305:
4287:
4270:
4242:
4224:
4203:
4188:
4162:
4136:
4104:
4080:
4064:
4043:
4017:
3988:
3964:
3940:
3914:
3867:
3853:
3838:
3824:
3809:
3775:
3760:
3703:
3681:
3664:
3604:
3564:
3550:
3532:
3471:
3445:
3430:
3401:
3387:
3365:
3350:
3335:
3319:
3298:
3283:
3250:
3217:
3196:
3182:
3168:
3138:
3124:
3110:
3096:
3082:
3067:
3051:
2997:
2976:
2962:
2940:
2925:
2911:
2892:
2866:
2848:
2830:
2802:
2787:
2751:
2736:
2716:
2705:
2694:
If that's what you keep reading, I think the issue isn't with the sources but how you read them.
2689:
2677:
2660:
2643:
2626:
2614:
2597:
2585:
2549:
2534:
2522:
2507:
2486:
2471:
2435:
2420:
2401:
2384:
2366:
2355:
2341:
2329:
2297:
2282:
2267:
2252:
2236:
2193:
2157:
2124:
2092:
2024:
2000:
1983:
1969:
1950:
1935:
1920:
1900:
1885:
1863:
1850:
1827:
1813:
1794:
1759:
1736:
1720:
1689:
1675:
1661:
1647:
1624:
1583:
1568:
1554:
1539:
1515:
1501:
1464:
1443:
1424:
1410:
1399:
1384:
1372:
1321:
1303:
1288:
1277:
Surely an article about a picture which hasn't even been made yet can only be an advertisement?
1266:
1246:
1206:
1192:
1174:
1156:
1137:
1106:
1072:
1058:
1023:
1001:
978:
950:
935:
901:
870:
855:
841:
827:
812:
794:
772:
758:
736:
715:
697:
665:
643:
622:
595:
569:
541:
515:
500:
482:
453:
417:
382:
342:
315:
279:
232:
209:
194:
175:
135:
117:
102:
1615:
Is there anything else to add to this discussion? It seems consensus is to include the info. -
1666:
True, but we also are wording it correctly by saying "In August 2013, Deadline reported..." -
1337:
108:
I see your point. It is already stated the its a draft, and by definition drafts can change.--
2876:...is completely useless. Why is it even there? No other sequel titled differently has that.
2492:
statement as recent as yesterday that makes no mention whatsoever of Hemsworth returning for
4396:
4321:
4154:
3767:
3695:
3656:
3596:
3560:
3528:
3489:
3485:
3463:
3441:
3422:
3397:
3361:
3331:
3294:
3246:
3192:
3120:
3092:
3063:
3043:
2743:
2541:
2478:
2455:
2427:
2376:
2372:
2347:
2293:
2274:
2263:
2244:
2232:
2215:
2210:. At the bottom you can see it's only "Avengers: Age of Ultron". There's also of course the
2077:
There is no "the" in the title of the film. It is simply titled, "Avengers: Age of Ultron".
1961:
1927:
1728:
1667:
1616:
1575:
1258:
1198:
1166:
1129:
893:
862:
847:
819:
786:
764:
746:
728:
707:
639:
587:
307:
167:
149:
2813:
4234:
4180:
2728:
2710:
No, it's what you feel is more trusting. If IGN or Variety aren't reliable, than what is?
2697:
2669:
2635:
2606:
2577:
2514:
2499:
2463:
2412:
2321:
2176:
2134:
why is the article's title only "The Avengers: Age of Ultron" (and why is the article for
1992:
1957:
1942:
1892:
1842:
1751:
1708:
1313:
800:
673:
With the recent announcement of the full title and the villain for the film it is getting
653:
1746:
over-enthusiasm for seeing a favorite character finally appearing in a live action film.
912:
330:
3794:
3173:
After a quick google news search, I dont see that it is being used to the same extent.--
528:. The press release from Marvel about RDJ's casting indicates that the official name is
4316:
In that case shouldn't SLJ be credited last? He's always gets the "and" at the end. --
4216:
3816:
3488:
article. For example on the Iron Man 3 article it could be changed to "It is the third
3201:
There is a hatnote there. But it's not just stating the obvious - it serves a purpose.
2315:
2314:
As of writing this, the source provided for Hemsworth's involvement is an article from
2143:
1975:
1805:
1507:
1064:
1015:
1007:
970:
921:
683:
612:
561:
474:
423:
401:
387:
366:
265:
257:
1229:
261:
3751:
Aaron Taylor-Johnson has OFFICIALLY been casted as Quicksilver for this movie!!!!!!
1530:
play Captain America in The Avengers: Age Of Ultron, he plans to direct the movie.--
1415:
The word confirmed would be superfluous here, the statement is their confirmation. -
3462:" won't throw anyone off because no other sequels, for now, have been announced. -
3039:
2222:
time I've seen the title given as "Marvel's The Avengers: Age of Ultron" is in the
941:
A non-appearance is not notable unless he/she was previously scheduled to appear.--
916:
631:
3421:, because that had the hatnote as well. And has since been readded to the lead. -
2564:
public to their audience, it comes through a press release given to a source like
256:
affects the portrayal of Quicksilver in this movie, because right now we can only
3595:
Ultron (albeit, probably how Downey is in partially built suits for Iron Man)? -
4317:
3898:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/james-spader-explains-why-he-639240
3556:
3524:
3437:
3393:
3357:
3327:
3290:
3242:
3188:
3149:
3116:
3088:
3059:
2809:
Fiege and Whedon have been talking about the return of Jeremy Renner as Hawkeye.
2289:
2259:
2228:
1767:
First, regarding the recent news about Elizabeth Olsen taking over the role, is
1481:
635:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1043:
was announced over a year ago but sources less than 24-hours ago still call it
915:
that Coulson will not be in this film. I already added this information to the
4395:- I'm not even going to bother with this. Just scroll up the page and read. -
3503:
4071:
I used both, one in the cast section and one in the pre-production section.--
1063:
Well, it should be removed from Thor's lead too. Completely unneccesary. --
4212:
3152:
pretty often and there's no hatnote. I think people would use common sense.
2130:
This brings up a question I have wondered for a while: if the full title is
2082:
http://collider.com/wp-content/uploads/avengers-age-of-ultron-logo-slice.jpg
4233:
Gotcha and that's what I figured was the reason, I just wanted to check ;)
4001:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/21/james-spader-ultron_n_4136437.html
3894:
http://entertainment.inquirer.net/114625/james-spader-ive-always-been-lucky
578:
will be fine for the moment, but I do think it will have a subtitle, as in
3511:". I suppose we could do something similar on the Cap article and link to
3476:
The Cap situation is indeed tricky. We can't exactly say it's "the second
162:
in sources about the predicament and what it would mean now in regards to
1309:
3458:
part because no other media has this name, and seeing "sequel to 2011's
1145:
WT:FILM#The Avengers 2, Thor 2, Captain America 2, etc., in article lead
331:
It appears Joss plans to continue on with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch.
1333:
1223:
While I can see that it is reasonable to believe someone searching for
4370:
Hawkeye is still in this movie and will be played by Jeremy Renner!!!
4114:
Aaron Taylor-Johnson officially confirmed to play Quicksilver in AoU.
2182:
Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
1771:
acceptable as a source? They are citing an anonymous source same as
1484:, all that matters is the information comes from a reliable source.
1314:
Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy...
1990:
http://collider.com/chris-evans-captain-america-2-sequel-interview/
1010:
to satisfy the reader and the lead mentions that it's a sequel to
723:
We already have our first attempt, copy and paste move by an IP,
3378:
and the eleventh installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.--
2899:
1233:. I do not think someone looking for the comic book, will type
4337:
3718:
2044:
1455:). We use his articles fairly often across the film project. -
1341:
25:
3030:", because even then, possibly knowing that Downy will be in
2461:
page was created significantly early for a film. Again, wait.
556:
before Marvel officially announced the title of the film, so
3370:
I guess I could settle for "It is intended to be the second
1492:
suggested just reflective of the author's colloquial tone.--
832:
You can try but it might not work because of the redirect.--
3480:
film", but maybe we could say "the second Marvel Studios
148:
Is it worth noting at all that Quicksilver has just been
1340:. Its not difficult and only takes a minute. Just go to
181:
I think so, once we know more about what this means for
3326:
No, "also known as" makes it sound somehow official. --
2814:
http://screenrant.com/avengers-2-age-of-ultron-hawkeye/
1480:
Evans, Whedon or Feige don't have to say anything. Per
724:
469:
441:
405:
370:
3795:
http://screencrush.com/everything-we-know-avengers-2/
3610:
Please remove Aaron Taylor-Johnson's casting addition
1781:
article reliable and should it now be included with
3356:
using it in that sense. Readers understand that. --
2857:
announcement from the studio, actor or filmmaker.--
252:until there is concrete information about how this
3034:, they could think this page is for that film, as
2725:interview Hemworth gave with E! settles the issue.
2371:But it is all speculation so far by news outlets.
3513:Captain America in film#Marvel Cinematic Universe
3880:James Spader playing Ultron a la RDJ as Iron Man
3537:The only other article that could be changed is
2170:is "The Avengers: Age of Ultron", we do not use
1709:I do not think it is appropriate to include them
3829:I see, and how about Renner's confirmation? -
3450:Well that is a little different than this and
2839:Whedon did not mention Renner, only Hawkeye.--
1634:, the wording does seem to be more related to
1804:is saying that Marvel is in talks with Olsen.
1237:. So is the hatnote on this page necessary?--
984:Yes, it has a title but people still call it
8:
3225:Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
3146:Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones
465:Knowledge:Article incubator/The Avengers 2
4296:Alright, thank you for clearing that up!
4034:Good find, we'll add it to the article.--
2981:Well, let's get new consensus, shall we?
1630:Not by me. Upon closer look I agree with
846:Will give it a shot right now to see. -
634:is not for evaluating incubator status.
2174:unless it is also the common name (ex.
3555:It's possible I'm over thinking it. --
3013:The redirect template should stay, or
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3507:, and the seventh installment in the
3038:is not used anywhere in the article.
166:as it will be released after DoFP. -
7:
2214:that doesn't have the "The" and the
2132:Marvel's The Avengers: Age of Ultron
2109:Marvel's The Avengers: Age of Ultron
779:Marvel's The Avengers: Age of Ultron
473:– Article has reached 25 references
3238:Captain America: The Winter Soldier
3101:It's not wrong, it's colloquial.--
580:Marvel's The Avengers: (something)
24:
3979:kind of Ultron Spader will be."--
1974:I have already removed Johansson.
1143:The discussion has been moved to
436:) copy and pasted this talk page
4386:
4341:
4144:
4025:
3922:
3722:
3646:
3609:
2098:
2048:
2006:
749:, and then deal with its merits.
29:
4334:Edit request on 4 November 2013
2218:which has no "The" either. The
532:, although that could change.--
400:) copy and pasted this article
365:) copy and pasted this article
3715:Edit request on 6 October 2013
3565:05:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3551:05:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3533:04:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3472:03:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3446:03:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3431:02:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3402:02:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3388:02:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3366:01:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3351:01:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3336:01:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3320:01:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3299:01:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3284:00:59, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3251:00:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3218:00:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3197:00:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3183:00:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
3169:23:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3139:23:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3125:23:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3111:23:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3097:23:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3083:23:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3068:23:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
3052:23:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2998:19:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2977:19:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2963:19:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2941:19:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2926:19:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2912:19:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2898:It's there per consensus, see
2893:18:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
2872:The Avengers 2 redirects here.
2867:13:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
2752:19:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
2737:18:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
1294:Surely, you can be mistaken.--
888:Hopefully we are in business:
1:
2717:01:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
2706:00:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
2690:00:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
2678:23:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2661:23:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2644:23:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2627:23:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2615:23:02, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2598:22:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2586:22:37, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
2298:19:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
2283:18:53, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
2268:17:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
2253:15:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
2237:05:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
4405:04:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
4380:03:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
4326:03:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
4306:20:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
4288:20:19, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
4271:20:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
4243:17:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
4225:16:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
4204:15:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
4189:12:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
4169:Reoccuring cast descriptions
4163:20:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
4137:20:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
4105:00:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
4081:22:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
4065:22:25, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
4044:19:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
4018:18:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
3989:21:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
3965:20:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
3941:18:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
3915:22:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
3868:20:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
3854:19:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
3839:19:37, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
3825:19:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
3810:17:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
2208:Bradley Cooper press release
2041:Edit request on 23 July 2013
18:Talk:Avengers: Age of Ultron
4364:to reactivate your request.
4352:has been answered. Set the
3776:00:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
3761:21:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
3745:to reactivate your request.
3733:has been answered. Set the
3704:15:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
3682:10:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
3665:05:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
3639:04:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
3605:04:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
2849:20:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
2831:19:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
2803:12:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
2788:03:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
2550:01:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
2535:00:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
2523:23:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
2508:15:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
2487:15:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
2472:06:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
2436:22:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2421:19:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2402:18:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2385:17:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2367:17:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2356:17:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2342:17:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2330:17:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
2071:to reactivate your request.
2059:has been answered. Set the
2025:18:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
2001:18:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1984:14:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1970:23:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1951:22:53, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1936:12:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1921:04:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1901:03:10, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1886:02:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1864:01:43, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
1851:22:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
1828:19:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1814:19:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
1795:12:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
1235:The Avengers: Age of Ultron
1225:The Avengers: Age of Ultron
1181:The Avengers: Age of Ultron
1163:The Avengers: Age of Ultron
1126:The Avengers: Age of Ultron
745:I wonder if we should just
586:has labeled their films. -
4421:
2203:James Spader press release
1690:13:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
1676:00:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
1662:22:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
1648:19:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
1625:19:12, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
1584:22:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1569:22:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1555:13:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1540:13:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1526:13:32 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1516:12:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1502:12:45, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1477:03:27 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1465:01:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1444:01:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1425:01:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1411:00:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1400:00:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1385:00:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
1373:22:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
155:X-Men: Days of Future Past
126:Okay, I have removed it. -
3509:Marvel Cinematic Universe
2194:00:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2158:00:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
2125:21:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
2093:20:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
1322:17:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
1304:11:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
1289:11:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
1267:20:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1247:20:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1207:19:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1193:17:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1179:I'm fine with or "simply
1175:17:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1157:17:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1138:17:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1107:13:29, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1073:13:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1059:13:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1024:13:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1002:12:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
979:12:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
951:20:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
936:20:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
902:22:19, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
871:22:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
856:22:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
842:21:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
828:21:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
813:20:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
795:19:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
773:19:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
759:19:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
737:18:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
716:17:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
698:17:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
666:21:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
644:21:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
623:18:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
596:23:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
570:22:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
542:21:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
516:21:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
501:21:28, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
483:17:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
454:03:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
418:03:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
88:The new Kevin Feige quote
4089:okay awesome, thanks!!
1760:01:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
1737:16:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
1721:06:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
799:We can try requesting a
343:05:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
316:00:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
280:23:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
233:21:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
210:21:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
195:21:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
176:20:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
3231:Star Trek Into Darkness
546:The Knowledge page for
530:Marvel's The Avengers 2
383:17:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
136:21:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
118:18:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
103:17:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
3374:film following 2012's
2770:Returning cast members
2258:been done that way. --
2224:original press release
1802:The Hollywood Reporter
675:"more media traction."
552:was originally titled
3417:Okay, so what now of
3376:Marvel's The Avengers
2136:Marvel's The Avengers
1308:I haven't attended a
42:of past discussions.
3539:Thor: The Dark World
3419:Thor: The Dark World
2216:official Marvel page
2107:, the full title is
1783:her initial reaction
1040:Thor: The Dark World
549:Thor: The Dark World
4179:page cast section?
3782:Screen Crush source
3519:" bit with "second
348:Copy and paste move
264:what they will do.
3692:Hollywood Reporter
2113:source from Marvel
1868:The difference is
1836:Scarlett Johansson
907:Non-appearing cast
4368:
4367:
4261:comment added by
4127:comment added by
4095:comment added by
4055:comment added by
4008:comment added by
3955:comment added by
3905:comment added by
3749:
3748:
3629:comment added by
3495:following 2008's
2821:comment added by
2075:
2074:
1960:on their part? -
1328:Archiving sources
969:" any longer. --
957:"commonly called
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4412:
4394:
4390:
4389:
4359:
4355:
4345:
4344:
4338:
4273:
4152:
4148:
4147:
4139:
4107:
4067:
4033:
4029:
4028:
4020:
3999:Another source:
3967:
3930:
3926:
3925:
3917:
3740:
3736:
3726:
3725:
3719:
3654:
3650:
3649:
3641:
3486:Iron Man in film
3309:
3207:
3158:
2987:
2952:
2918:Darkwarriorblake
2882:
2833:
2713:Rusted AutoParts
2686:Rusted AutoParts
2657:Rusted AutoParts
2623:Rusted AutoParts
2594:Rusted AutoParts
2531:Rusted AutoParts
2363:Rusted AutoParts
2338:Rusted AutoParts
2310:Hemsworth Source
2155:
2148:
2106:
2102:
2101:
2066:
2062:
2052:
2051:
2045:
2014:
2010:
2009:
1911:music website.--
1860:Rusted AutoParts
1632:Darkwarriorblake
1561:Darkwarriorblake
1523:Rusted AutoParts
1474:Rusted AutoParts
1407:Rusted AutoParts
1381:Rusted AutoParts
933:
926:
695:
688:
628:Procedural close
615:
609:Cautious support
524:does seem to be
508:Darkwarriorblake
472:
277:
270:
202:Darkwarriorblake
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4420:
4419:
4415:
4414:
4413:
4411:
4410:
4409:
4387:
4385:
4357:
4353:
4342:
4336:
4256:
4253:
4171:
4145:
4143:
4122:
4116:
4090:
4050:
4026:
4024:
4003:
3950:
3923:
3921:
3900:
3882:
3784:
3738:
3734:
3723:
3717:
3647:
3645:
3624:
3612:
3586:
3482:Captain America
3478:Captain America
3392:I like that. --
3341:publications.--
3318:
3308:Taylor Trescott
3307:
3216:
3206:Taylor Trescott
3205:
3167:
3157:Taylor Trescott
3156:
2996:
2986:Taylor Trescott
2985:
2961:
2951:Taylor Trescott
2950:
2891:
2881:Taylor Trescott
2880:
2874:
2816:
2772:
2312:
2177:Dr. Strangelove
2151:
2144:
2099:
2097:
2064:
2060:
2049:
2043:
2007:
2005:
1838:
1779:Superhero Hype!
1774:Superhero Hype!
1704:
1654:ProfessorKilroy
1358:
1342:webcitation.org
1330:
1275:
1221:
1197:Great. Done. -
963:
929:
922:
913:recently stated
909:
691:
684:
613:
468:
462:
350:
273:
266:
146:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4418:
4416:
4408:
4407:
4366:
4365:
4346:
4335:
4332:
4331:
4330:
4329:
4328:
4311:
4310:
4309:
4308:
4291:
4290:
4280:TriiipleThreat
4252:
4249:
4248:
4247:
4246:
4245:
4228:
4227:
4207:
4206:
4196:TriiipleThreat
4170:
4167:
4166:
4165:
4115:
4112:
4111:
4110:
4109:
4108:
4084:
4083:
4073:TriiipleThreat
4047:
4046:
4036:TriiipleThreat
3998:
3996:
3995:
3994:
3993:
3992:
3991:
3981:TriiipleThreat
3971:
3970:
3969:
3968:
3944:
3943:
3933:TriiipleThreat
3881:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3872:
3871:
3870:
3860:Mainstreammark
3846:TriiipleThreat
3831:Mainstreammark
3802:Mainstreammark
3798:
3797:
3783:
3780:
3779:
3778:
3747:
3746:
3727:
3716:
3713:
3709:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3674:TriiipleThreat
3668:
3667:
3611:
3608:
3585:
3582:
3581:
3580:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3576:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3572:
3571:
3570:
3543:TriiipleThreat
3415:
3414:
3413:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3404:
3380:TriiipleThreat
3343:TriiipleThreat
3323:
3322:
3314:
3276:TriiipleThreat
3272:
3271:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3267:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3212:
3185:
3175:TriiipleThreat
3163:
3131:TriiipleThreat
3103:TriiipleThreat
3075:TriiipleThreat
3036:The Avengers 2
3019:The Avengers 2
3015:The Avengers 2
3011:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3005:
3004:
3003:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2992:
2969:TriiipleThreat
2957:
2933:TriiipleThreat
2904:TriiipleThreat
2887:
2873:
2870:
2859:TriiipleThreat
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2841:TriiipleThreat
2811:
2810:
2806:
2805:
2795:TriiipleThreat
2771:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2726:
2695:
2667:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2633:
2604:
2576:
2574:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2497:
2462:
2459:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2320:
2311:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2186:TriiipleThreat
2161:
2160:
2117:TriiipleThreat
2085:24.121.188.207
2073:
2072:
2053:
2042:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2017:TriiipleThreat
1913:TriiipleThreat
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1878:TriiipleThreat
1837:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1820:TriiipleThreat
1787:TriiipleThreat
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1740:
1739:
1713:TriiipleThreat
1703:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1682:TriiipleThreat
1640:TriiipleThreat
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1547:TriiipleThreat
1542:
1532:TriiipleThreat
1494:TriiipleThreat
1436:TriiipleThreat
1357:
1354:
1346:TriiipleThreat
1329:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1306:
1296:TriiipleThreat
1274:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1239:TriiipleThreat
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1185:TriiipleThreat
1149:TriiipleThreat
1122:The Avengers 2
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1099:TriiipleThreat
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1051:TriiipleThreat
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1008:The Avengers 2
994:TriiipleThreat
986:The Avengers 2
967:The Avengers 2
962:
959:The Avengers 2
955:
954:
953:
943:TriiipleThreat
908:
905:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
858:
834:TriiipleThreat
805:TriiipleThreat
801:technical move
775:
751:TriiipleThreat
740:
739:
718:
671:
670:
669:
668:
658:TriiipleThreat
654:technical move
647:
646:
625:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
576:The Avengers 2
558:The Avengers 2
534:TriiipleThreat
526:The Avengers 2
493:TriiipleThreat
470:The Avengers 2
461:
460:Requested move
458:
457:
456:
438:into main talk
402:into mainspace
367:into mainspace
353:Prince of Peas
349:
346:
335:TriiipleThreat
329:Minor update:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
215:
214:
213:
212:
187:TriiipleThreat
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
121:
120:
110:TriiipleThreat
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4417:
4406:
4402:
4398:
4393:
4384:
4383:
4382:
4381:
4377:
4373:
4363:
4360:parameter to
4351:
4347:
4340:
4339:
4333:
4327:
4323:
4319:
4315:
4314:
4313:
4312:
4307:
4303:
4299:
4295:
4294:
4293:
4292:
4289:
4285:
4281:
4276:
4275:
4274:
4272:
4268:
4264:
4260:
4251:Casting Order
4250:
4244:
4240:
4236:
4232:
4231:
4230:
4229:
4226:
4222:
4218:
4214:
4209:
4208:
4205:
4201:
4197:
4193:
4192:
4191:
4190:
4186:
4182:
4178:
4177:
4168:
4164:
4160:
4156:
4151:
4142:
4141:
4140:
4138:
4134:
4130:
4126:
4121:
4113:
4106:
4102:
4098:
4097:71.188.23.237
4094:
4088:
4087:
4086:
4085:
4082:
4078:
4074:
4070:
4069:
4068:
4066:
4062:
4058:
4057:71.188.23.237
4054:
4045:
4041:
4037:
4032:
4023:
4022:
4021:
4019:
4015:
4011:
4010:71.188.23.237
4007:
4002:
3990:
3986:
3982:
3977:
3976:
3975:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3966:
3962:
3958:
3954:
3948:
3947:
3946:
3945:
3942:
3938:
3934:
3929:
3920:
3919:
3918:
3916:
3912:
3908:
3904:
3899:
3895:
3890:
3889:
3885:
3879:
3869:
3865:
3861:
3857:
3856:
3855:
3851:
3847:
3842:
3841:
3840:
3836:
3832:
3828:
3827:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3811:
3807:
3803:
3796:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3789:
3781:
3777:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3764:
3763:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3744:
3741:parameter to
3732:
3728:
3721:
3720:
3714:
3712:
3705:
3701:
3697:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3684:
3683:
3679:
3675:
3670:
3669:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3653:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3640:
3636:
3632:
3631:71.188.17.148
3628:
3623:
3618:
3615:
3607:
3606:
3602:
3598:
3594:
3590:
3583:
3568:
3567:
3566:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3553:
3552:
3548:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3522:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3505:
3500:
3499:
3494:
3492:
3487:
3483:
3479:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3469:
3465:
3461:
3457:
3453:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3443:
3439:
3435:
3434:
3433:
3432:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3385:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3363:
3359:
3354:
3353:
3352:
3348:
3344:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3333:
3329:
3325:
3324:
3321:
3317:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3302:
3301:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3239:
3233:
3232:
3227:
3226:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3215:
3210:
3209:
3208:
3200:
3199:
3198:
3194:
3190:
3186:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3161:
3160:
3159:
3151:
3148:
3147:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3136:
3132:
3128:
3127:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3108:
3104:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3071:
3070:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3053:
3049:
3045:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3029:
3024:
3020:
3016:
2999:
2995:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2960:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2938:
2934:
2929:
2928:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2890:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2871:
2869:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2832:
2828:
2824:
2823:71.188.24.247
2820:
2815:
2808:
2807:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2785:
2781:
2780:Fandraltastic
2776:
2769:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2727:
2724:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2715:
2714:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2703:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2688:
2687:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2668:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2659:
2658:
2653:
2645:
2641:
2637:
2634:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2625:
2624:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2605:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2596:
2595:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2571:
2567:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2533:
2532:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2513:the villain.
2511:
2510:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2498:
2495:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2457:
2437:
2433:
2429:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2409:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2394:Fandraltastic
2391:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2364:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2340:
2339:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2317:
2316:Empire Online
2309:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:official logo
2209:
2204:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2178:
2173:
2172:official name
2169:
2168:WP:COMMONNAME
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2159:
2156:
2154:
2149:
2147:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2105:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2083:
2078:
2070:
2067:parameter to
2058:
2054:
2047:
2046:
2040:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2013:
2004:
2003:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1991:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1835:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1775:
1770:
1769:Bleeding Cool
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1702:Saoirse Ronan
1701:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1543:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1528:
1527:
1525:
1524:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:Fandraltastic
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:
1476:
1475:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1457:Fandraltastic
1454:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1417:Fandraltastic
1414:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1392:Fandraltastic
1388:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:Fandraltastic
1362:
1355:
1353:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1273:Advertisement
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1255:Age of Ultron
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1230:Age of Ultron
1227:, might type
1226:
1218:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1095:readers first
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:readers first
987:
983:
982:
981:
980:
976:
972:
968:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
939:
938:
937:
934:
932:
927:
925:
918:
914:
906:
904:
903:
899:
895:
891:
872:
868:
864:
859:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
825:
821:
816:
815:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
797:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
777:Also name is
776:
774:
770:
766:
762:
761:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
743:
742:
741:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
702:
701:
700:
699:
696:
694:
689:
687:
680:
676:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
648:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
626:
624:
621:
620:
616:
610:
607:
606:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
572:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:WP:COMMONNAME
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
502:
498:
494:
489:
485:
484:
480:
476:
471:
466:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
429:
425:
422:
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
393:
389:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
358:
354:
347:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
317:
313:
309:
304:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
281:
278:
276:
271:
269:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
234:
230:
226:
225:Fandraltastic
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
211:
207:
203:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
156:
152:to appear in
151:
143:
137:
133:
129:
128:Fandraltastic
125:
124:
123:
122:
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:
105:
104:
100:
96:
95:Fandraltastic
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4391:
4372:108.29.8.135
4369:
4361:
4350:edit request
4257:— Preceding
4254:
4174:
4172:
4149:
4123:— Preceding
4117:
4091:— Preceding
4051:— Preceding
4048:
4030:
4004:— Preceding
3997:
3957:98.110.7.238
3951:— Preceding
3927:
3901:— Preceding
3891:
3887:
3886:
3883:
3799:
3785:
3753:108.29.8.135
3750:
3742:
3731:edit request
3710:
3691:
3687:
3651:
3625:— Preceding
3619:
3616:
3613:
3592:
3587:
3520:
3516:
3502:
3496:
3490:
3481:
3477:
3459:
3455:
3451:
3418:
3416:
3375:
3371:
3305:
3304:
3273:
3236:
3229:
3223:
3203:
3202:
3154:
3153:
3144:
3143:People call
3035:
3031:
3028:The Avengers
3027:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3012:
2983:
2982:
2948:
2947:
2878:
2877:
2875:
2855:
2817:— Preceding
2812:
2777:
2773:
2712:
2685:
2656:
2622:
2593:
2569:
2565:
2562:
2530:
2493:
2452:
2362:
2337:
2313:
2219:
2200:
2181:
2175:
2166:Because the
2152:
2145:
2140:The Avengers
2135:
2131:
2108:
2103:
2096:
2079:
2076:
2068:
2057:edit request
2011:
1958:synthesizing
1909:
1873:
1869:
1859:
1839:
1801:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1766:
1747:
1705:
1635:
1614:
1522:
1485:
1473:
1431:
1406:
1380:
1359:
1331:
1279:
1276:
1254:
1234:
1228:
1224:
1222:
1180:
1162:
1125:
1121:
1119:
1044:
1038:
1012:The Avengers
1011:
985:
966:
964:
958:
930:
923:
917:Phil Coulson
911:Joss Whedon
910:
887:
778:
720:
703:
692:
685:
674:
672:
627:
618:
608:
583:
579:
575:
557:
553:
547:
529:
525:
487:
486:
463:
430:
394:
386:
375:65.94.76.126
359:
351:
328:
302:
274:
267:
253:
182:
163:
153:
147:
91:
60:
43:
37:
4397:Favre1fan93
4298:68.45.110.5
4263:68.45.110.5
4155:Favre1fan93
4129:68.45.110.5
3907:98.110.3.28
3768:Favre1fan93
3696:Favre1fan93
3657:Favre1fan93
3597:Favre1fan93
3501:and 2010's
3464:Favre1fan93
3423:Favre1fan93
3150:Star Wars 2
3044:Favre1fan93
2931:archived.--
2744:Favre1fan93
2542:Favre1fan93
2479:Favre1fan93
2428:Favre1fan93
2377:Favre1fan93
2373:We can wait
2348:Favre1fan93
2275:Favre1fan93
2245:Favre1fan93
1962:Favre1fan93
1928:Favre1fan93
1729:Favre1fan93
1668:Favre1fan93
1617:Favre1fan93
1576:Favre1fan93
1259:Favre1fan93
1199:Favre1fan93
1167:Favre1fan93
1130:Favre1fan93
894:Favre1fan93
863:Favre1fan93
848:Favre1fan93
820:Favre1fan93
787:Favre1fan93
765:Favre1fan93
729:Favre1fan93
708:Favre1fan93
588:Favre1fan93
308:Favre1fan93
250:We can wait
168:Favre1fan93
144:Quicksilver
36:This is an
4354:|answered=
4235:Lady Lotus
4181:Lady Lotus
3800:Thanks. -
3735:|answered=
3504:Iron Man 2
3032:Avengers 3
3023:Avengers 2
2729:LoveWaffle
2698:LoveWaffle
2670:LoveWaffle
2636:LoveWaffle
2607:LoveWaffle
2578:LoveWaffle
2515:Frogkermit
2500:LoveWaffle
2494:Avengers 2
2464:LoveWaffle
2413:Frogkermit
2322:LoveWaffle
2080:The logo:
2061:|answered=
1993:Frogkermit
1943:Frogkermit
1893:Frogkermit
1843:Frogkermit
1752:Mtminchi08
1636:1:30 Train
1065:Rob Sinden
1016:Rob Sinden
971:Rob Sinden
446:65.94.79.6
410:65.94.79.6
303:Avengers 2
183:Avengers 2
164:Avengers 2
3817:Richiekim
3523:film". --
1976:Richiekim
1806:Richiekim
1748:Mea culpa
1508:Richiekim
747:WP:BEBOLD
584:Star Wars
562:Richiekim
475:Richiekim
442:this diff
424:Richiekim
406:this diff
388:Richiekim
371:this diff
258:speculate
160:mentioned
150:announced
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
4392:Not done
4259:unsigned
4221:contribs
4176:Avengers
4125:unsigned
4118:Source:
4093:unsigned
4053:unsigned
4006:unsigned
3953:unsigned
3928:Not done
3903:unsigned
3892:Source:
3688:Deadline
3627:unsigned
3498:Iron Man
3491:Iron Man
3372:Avengers
3316:my edits
3214:my edits
3165:my edits
2994:my edits
2959:my edits
2889:my edits
2819:unsigned
2566:Deadline
2104:Not done
1486:Deadline
1434:count?--
1432:Deadline
1310:ComicCon
1281:Baska436
1257:page. -
721:Comment:
704:Support:
488:Comment:
434:contribs
398:contribs
363:contribs
254:actually
3844:sure.--
2390:Variety
1338:linkrot
1334:WebCite
1219:Hatnote
1093:Again,
262:surmise
39:archive
4318:DocNox
4278:two.--
3620:Link:
3584:Spader
3557:DocNox
3525:DocNox
3517:Thor 2
3456:Thor 2
3452:CapTWS
3438:DocNox
3394:DocNox
3358:DocNox
3328:DocNox
3291:DocNox
3243:DocNox
3189:DocNox
3117:DocNox
3089:DocNox
3060:DocNox
2290:DocNox
2260:DocNox
2229:DocNox
2146:Spidey
2138:only "
1800:Well,
1046:Thor 2
924:Spidey
783:Source
686:Spidey
679:people
636:Apteva
554:Thor 2
440:, see
404:, see
369:, see
268:Spidey
4358:|ans=
4348:This
3739:|ans=
3729:This
3313:- +
3211:- +
3162:- +
3040:WP:RF
2991:- +
2956:- +
2900:above
2886:- +
2458:idea.
2319:page.
2065:|ans=
2055:This
1356:Evans
1128:). -
677:More
632:WP:RM
619:Slash
16:<
4401:talk
4376:talk
4322:talk
4302:talk
4284:talk
4267:talk
4239:talk
4217:talk
4213:Erik
4200:talk
4185:talk
4159:talk
4150:Done
4133:talk
4101:talk
4077:talk
4061:talk
4040:talk
4031:Done
4014:talk
3985:talk
3961:talk
3937:talk
3911:talk
3864:talk
3850:talk
3835:talk
3821:talk
3806:talk
3788:this
3772:talk
3757:talk
3700:talk
3678:talk
3661:talk
3652:Done
3635:talk
3601:talk
3589:Here
3561:talk
3547:talk
3529:talk
3521:Thor
3493:film
3468:talk
3460:Thor
3442:talk
3427:talk
3398:talk
3384:talk
3362:talk
3347:talk
3332:talk
3295:talk
3280:talk
3247:talk
3193:talk
3179:talk
3135:talk
3121:talk
3107:talk
3093:talk
3079:talk
3064:talk
3048:talk
2973:talk
2937:talk
2922:talk
2908:talk
2863:talk
2845:talk
2827:talk
2799:talk
2784:talk
2748:talk
2733:talk
2723:this
2702:talk
2674:talk
2666:IGN.
2640:talk
2611:talk
2603:not.
2582:talk
2546:talk
2519:talk
2504:talk
2483:talk
2468:talk
2456:wait
2432:talk
2417:talk
2398:talk
2381:talk
2375:. -
2352:talk
2326:talk
2294:talk
2279:talk
2264:talk
2249:talk
2233:talk
2220:only
2190:talk
2184:).--
2180:not
2142:")?
2121:talk
2111:per
2089:talk
2021:talk
2012:Done
1997:talk
1980:talk
1966:talk
1947:talk
1932:talk
1917:talk
1897:talk
1882:talk
1847:talk
1824:talk
1810:talk
1791:talk
1756:talk
1733:talk
1717:talk
1686:talk
1672:talk
1658:talk
1644:talk
1621:talk
1580:talk
1565:talk
1551:talk
1536:talk
1512:talk
1498:talk
1482:WP:V
1461:talk
1440:talk
1421:talk
1396:talk
1369:talk
1361:Here
1350:talk
1318:talk
1300:talk
1285:talk
1263:talk
1243:talk
1203:talk
1189:talk
1183:".--
1171:talk
1153:talk
1134:talk
1103:talk
1069:talk
1055:talk
1020:talk
998:talk
975:talk
947:talk
898:talk
867:talk
852:talk
838:talk
824:talk
809:talk
791:talk
785:. -
769:talk
755:talk
733:talk
727:. -
725:here
712:talk
662:talk
640:talk
614:Red
592:talk
566:talk
538:talk
520:The
512:talk
497:talk
479:talk
450:talk
428:talk
414:talk
392:talk
379:talk
357:talk
339:talk
312:talk
229:talk
206:talk
191:talk
172:talk
132:talk
114:talk
99:talk
4356:or
3737:or
2902:.--
2573:of.
2570:THR
2568:or
2153:104
2115:.--
2063:or
1874:MTV
1870:THR
1785:?--
1711:.--
1638:.--
1147:.--
1124:or
1097:.--
1049:.--
992:.--
931:104
803:.--
693:104
656:.--
444:--
408:--
373:--
275:104
260:or
185:.--
4403:)
4378:)
4362:no
4324:)
4304:)
4286:)
4269:)
4241:)
4223:)
4219:|
4202:)
4187:)
4161:)
4153:-
4135:)
4103:)
4079:)
4063:)
4042:)
4016:)
3987:)
3963:)
3939:)
3913:)
3896:,
3866:)
3852:)
3837:)
3823:)
3808:)
3774:)
3759:)
3743:no
3702:)
3690:,
3680:)
3663:)
3655:-
3637:)
3603:)
3593:in
3563:)
3549:)
3531:)
3470:)
3444:)
3429:)
3400:)
3386:)
3364:)
3349:)
3334:)
3297:)
3282:)
3249:)
3195:)
3181:)
3137:)
3123:)
3109:)
3095:)
3081:)
3066:)
3050:)
3042:-
2975:)
2939:)
2924:)
2910:)
2865:)
2847:)
2829:)
2801:)
2786:)
2750:)
2735:)
2704:)
2676:)
2642:)
2613:)
2584:)
2548:)
2521:)
2506:)
2485:)
2470:)
2434:)
2419:)
2400:)
2383:)
2354:)
2328:)
2296:)
2281:)
2266:)
2251:)
2235:)
2227:--
2192:)
2123:)
2091:)
2069:no
2023:)
2015:--
1999:)
1982:)
1968:)
1949:)
1934:)
1919:)
1899:)
1884:)
1849:)
1826:)
1812:)
1793:)
1758:)
1735:)
1719:)
1688:)
1674:)
1660:)
1646:)
1623:)
1582:)
1567:)
1553:)
1538:)
1514:)
1500:)
1463:)
1442:)
1423:)
1398:)
1371:)
1352:)
1320:)
1302:)
1287:)
1265:)
1245:)
1205:)
1191:)
1173:)
1155:)
1136:)
1105:)
1071:)
1057:)
1022:)
1000:)
977:)
949:)
900:)
892:-
869:)
854:)
840:)
826:)
811:)
793:)
781:.
771:)
757:)
735:)
714:)
664:)
642:)
630:.
594:)
568:)
540:)
514:)
499:)
481:)
467:→
452:)
416:)
381:)
341:)
333:--
314:)
231:)
208:)
193:)
174:)
134:)
116:)
101:)
76:→
4399:(
4374:(
4320:(
4300:(
4282:(
4265:(
4237:(
4215:(
4198:(
4183:(
4157:(
4131:(
4099:(
4075:(
4059:(
4038:(
4012:(
3983:(
3959:(
3935:(
3909:(
3862:(
3848:(
3833:(
3819:(
3804:(
3770:(
3755:(
3698:(
3676:(
3659:(
3633:(
3599:(
3559:(
3545:(
3527:(
3466:(
3440:(
3425:(
3396:(
3382:(
3360:(
3345:(
3330:(
3293:(
3278:(
3245:(
3191:(
3177:(
3133:(
3119:(
3105:(
3091:(
3077:(
3062:(
3046:(
2971:(
2935:(
2920:(
2906:(
2861:(
2843:(
2825:(
2797:(
2782:(
2746:(
2731:(
2700:(
2672:(
2638:(
2609:(
2580:(
2544:(
2517:(
2502:(
2496:.
2481:(
2466:(
2430:(
2415:(
2396:(
2379:(
2350:(
2324:(
2292:(
2277:(
2262:(
2247:(
2231:(
2188:(
2119:(
2087:(
2019:(
1995:(
1978:(
1964:(
1945:(
1930:(
1915:(
1895:(
1880:(
1845:(
1822:(
1808:(
1789:(
1754:(
1731:(
1715:(
1684:(
1670:(
1656:(
1642:(
1619:(
1578:(
1563:(
1549:(
1534:(
1510:(
1496:(
1459:(
1453:2
1450:1
1438:(
1419:(
1394:(
1390:-
1367:(
1348:(
1316:(
1298:(
1283:(
1261:(
1241:(
1201:(
1187:(
1169:(
1151:(
1132:(
1101:(
1067:(
1053:(
1018:(
996:(
973:(
961:"
945:(
896:(
865:(
850:(
836:(
822:(
807:(
789:(
767:(
753:(
731:(
710:(
660:(
638:(
590:(
564:(
536:(
510:(
495:(
477:(
448:(
431:·
426:(
412:(
395:·
390:(
377:(
360:·
355:(
337:(
310:(
227:(
223:-
204:(
189:(
170:(
130:(
112:(
97:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.