238:
222:
206:
190:
22:
300:
436:
philosophers to distinguish between judgments based on fact and judgments based on values, creating division between science and philosophy." Rubbish. Not only is fact-value dichotomy a fiction, but the division---fact goes to science, value goes to philosophy---is through and through hogwash. It's not simply a factual error, it doesn't even make sense. Incoherent. --
92:
53:
102:
270:
588:
of the same ground. Relatedly, the final section contrasts consequentialism and "fitting-attitude theories", with an outgoing link to a stand-alone article on the former, and a complete dead-end on the latter. (The "values" article discusses FAT at greater length and in more context, note.) But
510:
Yes, Rescher is a very respected academic. I have not read it either (but have just ordered it by interlibrary loan to take a look). The title does provide the useful service of showing that the term "axiology" has not fallen into disuse, as one editor of this article had previously claimed. --
435:
He was German. That would probably explain his omission. German science is generally devoid of good sense which it trades in in favor of rigor. It think it can substitute lack of insight with deduction. If there's anything to complain about, it is the absolutely sophomoric "This concept led
339:
Last sentence of the introduction "Studies of both kinds are found in
Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology." looks to me like an advertisment for a journal. I would delete this myself, but I am quite a non-expert so I feel slightly uneasy about it.
530:
Additionally, it doesn't really explain what axiological issues are at play, and to do so would have to take a lot of unpacking in regards to the history of communication studies and the plurality of ontological and epistemological values in communication studies.
484:
is listed in the references section of the article. To me, it seems like an advertisement. I have read the book recently and I find it poor; I wonder whether any native
English speaking person would recommend it as a source of information.
424:
Discussions of axiology without mentioning
Hartman's The Structure of Value are seriously devoid of learning. He has made a major contribution to the study and understanding of value, and ought to be given a fair display on Knowledge.
304:
526:
I question whether the section on "issues in communication studies" is really relevant for this page. I think it would be better replaced with either the history of axiology of current schools of thought on axiology.
583:
I know, "clarify" a philosophy article, ha. But we have extensive discussion of "values" here, but no link anywhere to the main(?) article on the topic. Or certainly an article that appears to cover a
453:. The main topic of the book is perhaps axiology, that is the study of what is value, but I doubt that Pirsig actually uses the expression "axiology". Also, Pirsig's assumption that
657:. My idea is to include all the main points of the article "Axiology" into the article "Value theory" and then redirect it. The goal is to have a unified treatment of the subject.
123:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
593:
contains phrases like "heart of the debate between consequentialists and deontologists" -- yet no reference to the latter here, which we do have an article on.
556:
As there has been no comment on this for a couple weeks, I plan on removing the section on communication after 1 December 2017 unless there are objections. --
711:
706:
213:
67:
696:
691:
686:
681:
197:
160:
150:
63:
450:
316:
716:
741:
736:
701:
245:
75:
726:
721:
631:
369:
125:
465:
I removed the claim that Pirsig introduced the term "axiology", as ZMM's full text contains neither the substring "axiology" nor "axiol". --
746:
597:
596:
This is going to be confusing and opaque no matter what, I suspect, but can't the confusion and opacity be organised a little better?
731:
546:
115:
58:
303:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
33:
576:
229:
71:
373:
601:
409:
21:
389:
39:
345:
561:
557:
542:
538:
534:
499:(the author) at least has a serious history of engagement with relevant aspects of the discipline. --
365:
426:
461:
are the same is somewhat unorthodox, defying the common usage. --Dan 15:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
405:
341:
324:
662:
654:
639:
486:
466:
401:
385:
284:
276:
107:
496:
446:
512:
308:
237:
221:
205:
189:
675:
632:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy#Scope_of_the_articles_Value_theory_and_Axiology
320:
658:
650:
649:
As an update from the
Wikiproject discussion: I'm currently reworking the article "
635:
623:
612:
280:
362:
Both are almost synonymous, I suggest to merge those two entries. Best regards.
500:
299:
572:
120:
97:
627:
616:
119:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
91:
52:
666:
643:
605:
565:
550:
515:
503:
489:
469:
429:
413:
393:
377:
349:
328:
264:
15:
449:
introduced the term axiology to the general audience in his
236:
220:
204:
188:
294:
Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment
171:
622:For a discussion of the scope of the articles
8:
532:
168:
47:
451:Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
358:Merge Axiology and "value theory" entries
317:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
655:Talk:Value_theory#Changes_to_the_article
315:Above undated message substituted from
49:
129:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
113:This redirect is within the scope of
19:
7:
712:Mid-importance metaphysics articles
707:Redirect-Class metaphysics articles
38:It is of interest to the following
697:Mid-importance Aesthetics articles
692:Redirect-Class Aesthetics articles
687:Mid-importance Philosophy articles
682:Redirect-Class Philosophy articles
482:Value Matters: Studies in Axiology
476:Value Matters: Studies in Axiology
14:
495:Though I have not read the book,
384:Pure synonims. Definitely Merge!
298:
268:
155:This redirect has been rated as
135:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
100:
90:
51:
20:
717:Metaphysics task force articles
402:Talk:Value theory#Merge Request
275:This article was nominated for
138:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
742:Mid-importance ethics articles
737:Redirect-Class ethics articles
702:Aesthetics task force articles
606:19:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
420:Axiology and Robert S. Hartman
283:on 27 Dec 2016. The result of
1:
727:Mid-importance logic articles
722:Redirect-Class logic articles
667:07:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
566:18:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
470:14:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
441:Axiology and Robert M. Pirsig
350:13:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
430:04:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
404:was closed as no consensus.
329:15:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
644:11:47, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
577:values (Western philosophy)
551:06:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
394:22:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
763:
747:Ethics task force articles
161:project's importance scale
732:Logic task force articles
571:Clarify connections with
516:13:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
504:23:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
414:11:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
378:16:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
244:
228:
212:
196:
167:
154:
85:
46:
445:I wonder whether indeed
400:Note a merge request at
490:16:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
172:Associated task forces:
611:Scope of the articles
522:Communication section?
241:
225:
209:
193:
116:WikiProject Philosophy
240:
224:
208:
192:
335:Remove advertisment?
307:. Peer reviewers:
141:Philosophy articles
305:on the course page
242:
226:
210:
194:
126:general discussion
34:content assessment
553:
537:comment added by
368:comment added by
291:
290:
287:was no consensus.
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
251:
250:
108:Philosophy portal
754:
497:Nicholas Rescher
447:Robert M. Pirsig
380:
331:
302:
272:
271:
265:
179:
169:
143:
142:
139:
136:
133:
110:
105:
104:
103:
94:
87:
86:
81:
78:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
762:
761:
757:
756:
755:
753:
752:
751:
672:
671:
620:
581:
524:
478:
443:
422:
370:134.184.131.126
363:
360:
337:
314:
296:
269:
177:
140:
137:
134:
131:
130:
106:
101:
99:
79:
61:
12:
11:
5:
760:
758:
750:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
674:
673:
670:
669:
619:
609:
580:
569:
523:
520:
519:
518:
507:
506:
477:
474:
473:
472:
442:
439:
438:
437:
421:
418:
417:
416:
397:
396:
359:
356:
354:
336:
333:
295:
292:
289:
288:
285:the discussion
273:
261:
260:
257:
256:
253:
252:
249:
248:
243:
233:
232:
227:
217:
216:
211:
201:
200:
195:
185:
184:
182:
180:
174:
173:
165:
164:
157:Mid-importance
153:
147:
146:
144:
112:
111:
95:
83:
82:
80:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
759:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
679:
677:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
647:
646:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
618:
614:
610:
608:
607:
603:
599:
598:109.255.211.6
594:
592:
587:
578:
574:
570:
568:
567:
563:
559:
554:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
528:
521:
517:
514:
509:
508:
505:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
483:
475:
471:
468:
464:
463:
462:
460:
456:
452:
448:
440:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:Shhhnotsoloud
403:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
357:
355:
352:
351:
347:
343:
334:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
312:
310:
306:
301:
293:
286:
282:
278:
274:
267:
266:
247:
239:
235:
234:
231:
223:
219:
218:
215:
207:
203:
202:
199:
191:
187:
186:
183:
181:
176:
175:
170:
166:
162:
158:
152:
149:
148:
145:
128:
127:
122:
118:
117:
109:
98:
96:
93:
89:
88:
84:
77:
73:
69:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
651:Value theory
624:Value theory
621:
613:Value theory
595:
590:
585:
582:
555:
533:— Preceding
529:
525:
487:Dan Polansky
481:
479:
467:Dan Polansky
458:
454:
444:
423:
386:Semifinalist
361:
353:
338:
313:
297:
281:Value theory
156:
124:
114:
40:WikiProjects
29:
364:—Preceding
214:Metaphysics
68:Metaphysics
676:Categories
589:the given
573:deontology
558:Haydencb93
539:Haydencb93
513:WikiPedant
198:Aesthetics
132:Philosophy
121:philosophy
64:Aesthetics
59:Philosophy
480:The book
427:Wjkellpro
309:Omanzo693
628:Axiology
617:Axiology
547:contribs
535:unsigned
366:unsigned
321:PrimeBOT
30:redirect
659:Phlsph7
653:", see
636:Phlsph7
455:quality
277:merging
159:on the
630:, see
591:source
501:Brianh
342:Kkumer
246:Ethics
76:Ethics
36:scale.
459:value
279:with
230:Logic
72:Logic
28:This
663:talk
640:talk
626:and
615:and
602:talk
575:and
562:talk
543:talk
457:and
410:talk
390:talk
374:talk
346:talk
325:talk
586:lot
319:by
151:Mid
678::
665:)
642:)
634:.
604:)
564:)
549:)
545:•
485:--
412:)
392:)
376:)
348:)
327:)
311:.
178:/
74:/
70:/
66:/
62::
661:(
638:(
600:(
579:?
560:(
541:(
408:(
388:(
372:(
344:(
323:(
163:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
