2205:
in the introduction, but all the references to the Eight Power Allied Forces in this article were just the opening remarks that "the Eight Power Allied Forces entered China to" lift "the
Chinese" siege "of foreign invaders. "Siege" refers to the occupation of other people's land by the invaders through illegal means. It is the land illegally entered by the Eight Power Allied Forces into Chinese territory and "besieged" the Chinese people. It is the Boxer Rebellion's attempt to lift the siege of the Eight Power Allied Forces. This sentence should be changed to: The Eight Power Allied Forces forcibly entered Chinese territory, sabotaged the Boxer Rebellion's action against the invaders, and prevented the Chinese people from fighting for their own land and living rights.
1860:
invaders, not how foreigners slaughtered the
Chinese (this is actually more cruel, and is the reason for this uprising, but I did not see any paragraphs emphasizing this reason). So such a title is misleading readers. Indeed, some readers can find descriptions of aggressors' actions in paragraphs, but not everyone will carefully read every sentence; Some people will only glance at the beginning of the website (this part has no blame on the Eight Power Allied Forces, and describes the invasion of Chinese territory by the Eight Power Allied Forces and the prevention of Chinese resistance as the lifting of the siege), and glance at the title, and these messages leave the impression that "the Boxers have done bad things".
1074:
633:
2222:
1834:
820:
745:
1567:
729:
1063:
1054:
346:
810:
789:
1103:
617:
2041:(represent what all sources say in proportion to how common each view is). For the latter, I have been concerned this article does not follow a neutral point of view as concerning its characterization, and since this conversation started have been putting together a list of new sources not cited in the article, and then I'll start making sure that the existing text actually matches what the sources say. This work always takes a long time for me.
1765:
events itself and mislead readers to believe "Massacre of
Chinese Christians and of missionaries" matters more than the terrible crime of the Eight Nations. How can an article talking about the Chinese fighting against the Eight Nation who violate the sovereignty of the former but only have subtitles saying Chinese people kill the violator, without showcasing that the cause of such events is because of the cruel Eight Nation's terrible behaviour?
665:
761:
1094:
697:
64:
681:
713:
502:
2177:
1737:
1648:
306:
1083:
2029:, with policies and guidelines essentially being the strongest, broadest level of consensus, which is then applied more specifically per topic, but usually per article. We can't just override site policies for a specific article without a good reason, and it's important that no editor feels they are the owner of any given part of the site. Our core content policies here are
337:
574:
563:
552:
541:
530:
649:
442:
379:
1868:
relationship. The consequence of writing in this way is to leave readers with a simple impression that the Boxers were murderers. If you do not state in this entry what the believers have done to
Chinese civilians with equal importance, most people will not conduct additional searches and will assume that the believers are completely innocent.
1706:
2082:
Also, if there's an "editor in chief", is it true that this person doesn't need to be responsible for those mistakes I mentioned above? Even if people have pointed out some mistakes or wrong emphasise/logic that might misleading other readers to form their view in a bias way (sometimes even the world
1308:
However, referring to the above discussion, we came to an agreement that a 4 quadrant infobox was justified and probably necessary to strike a balance between "western-centric" depictions and ones which accurately depict the movement underlying the war. However, there is a distinct difference between
2250:
If you would like to discuss changes, please engage in a regular threaded discussion here and don't request edits to make your points with if they're not requesting specific edits with citations, it becomes disruptive very quickly. This article needs a lot of work, I agree, but we work from reliable
2204:
Surprisingly, the brutal situation of the Eight Nation
Alliance burning, killing, looting and plundering in China was not mentioned throughout the article, which was the reason for the birth and resistance of the Boxers and countless other Boxers. Such an important background should have been placed
2059:
I understand how much effort it would take to form a rigorous article including all the references. I really appreciate your effort in understanding my feelings and explaining everything to me although in many of the sentences I sounds push and not calm which I apologise again. Please forgive me for
1780:
What kind of person specifically joined the church? Landlords and gentry worship foreign things, cling to the thighs of foreigners, use their power to bully others, commit evil deeds, and oppress the truly poor and unaffordable common people. Without delving into such details and discussing what bad
1971:
But as the reviewer of the entry editor's suggestion, do you also have a responsibility to search for information to verify the loopholes in the entry I mentioned? Or is it that whoever makes a suggestion must provide the source, and the editor in chief of the entry is not responsible for verifying
1934:
Thank you for your reply, but I believe you are at least one of the people capable of editing entries and reviewing editing requirements. I think the content I mentioned is also something that you need to be responsible for. If you do not have the ability to take on such responsibility, please tell
1764:
The title of the chapter of "Aftermath" should be changed to "The massacre and other cruel acts of the Eight Nation
Alliance" or something that showcases the Eight Nation did worse things than "Massacre of Chinese Christians and of missionaries". Otherwise it doesn't emphasise the reason for these
1412:
I don't think the current state is a concern nor see it as oversimplified though I am happy with the proposed four picture approach representing a variety of belligerents. I am however a strong proponent of using photographs for this, as opposed to illustrations. Going back to the comment of IP who
1901:
I appreciate your patient response, but as the editor in chief of the entry, I believe it is your responsibility to promise to make as precise modifications as possible to any conflicting parts of the entry. Since you are the editor of the entries, you should know how these entries are regarded as
1867:
Similarly, as I mentioned earlier, you mentioned the Boxer
Massacre, but did not mention how the believers bullied the Chinese earlier, and how some Chinese landlords bullied the poorer Chinese after they joined the church. You did not clearly and equally describe these two things and their causal
1863:
You can't assume that readers will read every sentence carefully. Instead, you should objectively, fairly and clearly mark in the title the "Boxer
Rebellion Massacre" which is as important as "Boxer Rebellion Massacre" and "Eight Power Allied Forces Massacre Boxer Rebellion and Massacre of Chinese
1882:
I do want to restructure this part of the article: I don't think the
Massacre section should be a top level section at bare minimum, but I will not promise I will carry out these precise changes. I do appreciate the broad thrust of your concerns, and am going over the literature to make sure our
1397:
I don't think the current state is untenable but the depiction of the Boxers also isn't great. It looks like a scan from somebody's photo album since the image appears it was cut and pasted from the look of the upper border. The numerous artist illustrations depicting the war should be legible.
1859:
What I mean is to change the subtitle of next chapter,"aftermath", to "How the Eight Power Allied Forces Killed the
Chinese". If you want to discuss an uprising in which the Chinese people fought against foreign invaders, but specifically mentioned in the title how the Chinese slaughtered the
1180:
I think this could work, I mean the top 4 are all the same style (maybe crop out the description in picture 3) but other than that they all go together. Same thing with the two pictures, they both look good together. This is just an idea, but I think it would look good. I also think the boxer
1949:
As much as I wish articles were fixed in a short time, it's healthier to recognize it is a volunteer project driven by consensus. It is one of many articles on my and others' watchlists. If you would like to help out by providing additional reliable sources that would be useful in citing for
1683:
Contemporary British and American observers levelled their greatest criticism at German, Russian, and Japanese troops for their ruthlessness and willingness to execute Chinese of all ages and backgrounds, sometimes burning villages and killing their entire populations.{{sfnp|Cohen|1997|p=185
1902:
unique guidelines by most Westerners, and even cited by the academic community. If we do not guarantee as precise modifications as possible, the bias of the entries themselves will create a butterfly effect, constantly deepening people's misunderstandings of historical truth.
1840:
I don't see a major discrepancy in tone between "Massacre of Chinese Christians and of missionaries" and "Occupation, looting, and atrocities". In any case, if people don't get enough from the titles, they're free to read the actual paragraphs themselves, which should help.
1625:
This points to a problem: the article title is "Boxer Rebellion" (though I am among those who think it should be "Boxer Uprising") not "Boxer War." So I support the quest for at least a picture that has something to do with the Boxer Rebellion or Uprising. Maybe a map?
1781:
things these believers did that led to violent resistance from the poor, it is necessary to describe the violent resistance of the Boxers as a "cruel massacre" without questioning the use of the term "massacre" itself. This is misleading readers and very imprecise.
752:
421:
1417:, which is to say - the fanciful glory and adventure of war. I'm thinking of the Siege of the Legations illustration when I say this, have to say the other illustrations aren't quite legible to me in the six picture format. Sticking to photographs is better.
1230:
No infobox has to have multiple images. We should have an infobox that fulfills its purpose (key facts at a glance), and multiple images should only be entertained if they do not interfere with that, A mosaic of small color blobs would interfere in this way.
2086:
Sorry if my words sound sarcastic but I really don't mean to be like this. Just so far I do have this feeling. I don't mean to judge you (who kindly reply to me very quickly) or anyone edit this article. I just don't feel right about how things work like
2083:
view), as long as there's no source offered the "editor in chief" doesn't need to contribute in time to investigate and verify the information, and just leave the biased message on the Internet, which might be checked by thousands of people everyday?
2094:
I apologise again if I sounds too push. I respect your rules and knowledge and effort put into this article. It's just I don't think some readers view are valued in the same way, and a whole country's history isn't been taken seriously enough.
736:
417:
1813:
Then maybe you can mention how Chinese use “uprising”, "revolt" instead of "massacre" to descirbe this event. And provide complete information on the things you neglected and the actions of the believers that I mentioned in the original text.
768:
425:
2109:
I wouldn't want to explain all of our policies and guidelines here at length, as discussion on talk pages should generally hew towards direct discussion of the article in question. Do you mind if I pick this up on your talk page?
720:
672:
413:
401:
656:
640:
397:
393:
932:
I'm open to it, and the description of "boys-own looking" is quite correct. But it's better for someone to bring forward a specific alternative which we can use under the policies and directly compare the current picture to.
704:
688:
409:
405:
624:
389:
2090:
Because in my life experience, even if some infamous bloggers made mistakes on social media, when readers points out mistakes in their articles or even just few sentences of feeling they would make some effort to correct
2461:
1351:. If not, let's discuss the issue with a multipolar depiction beyond that "we do not have to have more than one image" when there is a clear expression and agreement that more than one image would enhance the page.
232:
2456:
947:
We should change it back to a battle in accordance with what most war pages do since a map does not exist. I don't understand why we want to "change it to show more actual focus on the rebellion aspect" when
1354:
As a proposal to get this started, how about four quadrants - one with a Japanese depiction, one picture of the Boxers, the siege of Tientsin, and another picture depicting the Boxers or allied troops?
2451:
2471:
904:
2486:
2446:
2466:
2441:
2411:
1916:
I am not an editor in chief: I have written very little of the article as it exists and when I first read it became one of many articles I saw needed these kinds of improvements.
2401:
2391:
2431:
2421:
2361:
2436:
2406:
2381:
2396:
2386:
1935:
me how to emphasize the importance of the issues I mentioned and to whom. And I also hope that you can respond to the proposals in my other sentences with equal emphasis.
297:
226:
2426:
2416:
2037:(we can't create new knowledge, only present what has already been established, with everything we write having to be check-able by the reader in a reliable source) and
515:
492:
454:
2376:
2481:
866:
47:
501:
2351:
1513:
2371:
2366:
2011:
So no one's in charge of the logic or tone of the whole article, as well as the balance of importance between details and the correlation between facts?
482:
158:
2346:
350:
2476:
2356:
123:
1369:
As long as they're all legible I am not opposed to having four images, but I do not agree that the present state is untenable or oversimplified.
1119:
Siege of the Legations in Peking * Battle of Tientsin * Battle at Beijing Castle * Boxer Rebellion painting * Boxers in China * allied artillery
876:
449:
384:
2336:
1250:
458:
164:
2066:
I sincerely hope this article would be modified to a more strict one. When I have time I would try to find sources for what I've suggested.
984:
I support making a four-quadrant infobox as a compromise with the 3 old infoxbox images plus the current one (even though it's already in
1216:
Like I said it is just an an idea. We could make the picture or info-box. We should at least have more than one picture in the info box.
2491:
2294:
1465:
1324:
involved numerous countries and their depictions of the conflict will inform a viewer's first impression and understanding of the page.
1302:
1519:
269:
908:
1689:
1073:
842:
76:
2341:
1271:
I will repeat myself: we do not have to have more than one image; it is more important that the images we present are legible.
178:
109:
86:
952:
exists. The Boxer Rebellion is not understood as a movement but as a war or intervention. I believe we should change it back.
247:
2034:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
183:
99:
82:
214:
2293:
Please edit article to actually display the casualties. The text is there, but it is not appearing in normal view. Thanks.
2060:
being like this because I haven't read anything sufficiently neutral on Knowledge when they talking about China's history.
1469:
1339:
the infobox which is not its purpose. Let's get back to designing a four quadrant infobox which strikes a balance between
1254:
153:
1968:
Thank you for emphasizing the provision of sources. I will try my best to include complete sources in my next suggestion.
1717:
1514:
https://mwi.westpoint.edu/americans-and-the-dragon-coalition-warfare-from-the-boxer-rebellion-to-the-future-battlefield/
359:
1543:
1477:
1257:
would go together. I just thing only have File:Boxer-tianjing-left.jpeg, is too little and doesn't show the full war.
833:
794:
144:
1523:
903:
Rather boys-own looking and US/west-centric ... Can we change it to show more actual focus on the rebellion aspect?
2229:
841:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
305:
264:
1990:. Material that isn't cited can be challenged and removed at any time, and it can't be readded without a source.
1555:
1262:
1221:
1189:
975:
923:
208:
316:
1547:
1394:
I'm glad we're in agreement! I would design the infobox myself but I am sure someone else can do a better job.
632:
2298:
1713:
2183:
2030:
1743:
1654:
1566:
744:
453:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
204:
188:
2063:
But I should not neglect other details you do have in this article and I really appreciate your time on it.
1062:
728:
1693:
1422:
1023:
938:
918:
No, the current pictures shows the largest battle of the war and showed a soldier who is very notable.
365:
1473:
254:
63:
1551:
1531:
1502:
1403:
1360:
1328:
1258:
1217:
1185:
1009:
971:
957:
919:
1184:
Only change I would make is to crop out the extra descriptions and blank stuff on pictures 3 and 5.
1053:
336:
2026:
1520:
https://www.archives.gov/files/publications/prologue/1999/winter/marines-boxer-rebellion-515634.jpg
1485:
240:
134:
2316:
2259:
2240:
2118:
2049:
1998:
1958:
1924:
1891:
1849:
1803:
1588:
1492:
1443:
1381:
1279:
1239:
1206:
967:
321:
149:
1298:
1102:
2274:
2210:
2133:
2100:
2071:
2016:
1977:
1940:
1907:
1873:
1819:
1786:
1770:
809:
788:
130:
220:
1418:
1019:
997:
993:
934:
616:
318:
1527:
1457:
1399:
1356:
1321:
1005:
953:
103:
970:
that included three pictures and information on what parts of the British Empier helped.
1498:
However, I have a few proposed photographs which evidently must be in the public domain.
2038:
1987:
1573:
1305:
to support that it's probably more often than not that infoboxes have multiple images).
1001:
996:
on board since they've reverted changes to the current image which they changed it to.
989:
985:
949:
664:
1413:
kicked off this discussion in April, the Western illustrations can be more than a bit
2330:
2309:
2252:
2233:
2111:
2042:
1991:
1951:
1917:
1884:
1842:
1796:
1631:
1578:
1433:
1371:
1348:
1290:
1272:
1232:
1199:
1093:
2270:
2206:
2129:
2096:
2067:
2012:
1973:
1936:
1903:
1869:
1815:
1782:
1766:
825:
760:
1524:
https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1999/winter/boxer-rebellion-1.html
1506:
1481:
1294:
988:
where I personally believe it belongs). That should correct the issue raised by
696:
1576:) but may require another iteration to show up properly in a crowded infobox.
1414:
1332:
1082:
815:
1572:, This is a good start (tried to do some very rudimentary observation of the
680:
70:
712:
320:
1988:
editor who wants to add material must provide sources verifying the claims
1883:
presentation isn't taking undue sides in its characterizations of events.
1627:
2321:
2302:
2278:
2264:
2245:
2214:
2137:
2123:
2104:
2075:
2054:
2020:
2003:
1981:
1963:
1944:
1929:
1911:
1896:
1877:
1854:
1823:
1808:
1790:
1774:
1721:
1697:
1596:
1559:
1535:
1451:
1426:
1407:
1389:
1364:
1284:
1266:
1244:
1225:
1211:
1198:
No, the images are too small at this size, and thus defeat the purpose.
1193:
1027:
1013:
979:
961:
942:
927:
912:
1795:
We use the language of our sources, and are not free to editorialize.
648:
441:
378:
1565:
1503:
https://www.nam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-01/1014698_full.jpg
838:
2171:
1731:
1642:
1542:
I can agree photographs are better, I personally believe that
1000:
would you support the old infobox in four-quadrants with your
330:
322:
94:
2462:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
2308:
Fixed, 'twas another bracketing error. Thanks for noticing.
759:
743:
727:
711:
695:
679:
663:
647:
631:
615:
500:
2457:
B-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
992:
about the infobox being too long. However we need to get
1564:
I think that one is good too, but could do with a crop.
40:
1181:
Rebellion can easily get 6 pictures in there info-box.
239:
1864:
People". Otherwise, this is prejudice and misleading.
69:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
837:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
513:
This article has been checked against the following
2452:
North American military history task force articles
1431:Strongly agreed with the "no illustrations" point.
753:
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
598:
512:
2472:United States military history task force articles
2269:Do you mean I need to offer souce of my request?
1293:that 6 images is too much (though I refer you to
1249:All I am saying is we should have more than one.
2487:C-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
2447:B-Class North American military history articles
1950:improvements( that would be deeply appreciated.
1335:does not do this page justice. We are currently
112:for general discussion of the article's subject.
2467:B-Class United States military history articles
1550:could go with with it in a 4 quadrant infobox.
1041:
2442:Japanese military history task force articles
2412:European military history task force articles
2232:that support the change you want to be made.
1507:https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/boxer-rebellion
253:
8:
2402:Chinese military history task force articles
2392:British military history task force articles
2168:Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2024
1728:Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2024
966:I agree, this was a major war. I perfer the
2432:German military history task force articles
2422:French military history task force articles
2362:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in History
1320:Moreover, we need to keep in mind that the
2437:B-Class Japanese military history articles
2407:B-Class European military history articles
2382:Asian military history task force articles
1986:In general it works as the following: the
1639:Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2024
1546:is one of the better pictures wecan uses.
1038:
1018:Yes, that sounds like a solid compromise.
783:
737:North American military history task force
595:
509:
373:
19:
15:
2397:B-Class Chinese military history articles
2387:B-Class British military history articles
769:United States military history task force
2427:B-Class German military history articles
2417:B-Class French military history articles
447:This article is within the scope of the
2377:B-Class Asian military history articles
785:
375:
334:
1456:To be fair articles contemporary with
467:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
457:. To use this banner, please see the
2482:Top-importance China-related articles
1327:As it stands, and where I agree with
1251:File:Boxer rebellion SLNSW 457281.jpg
905:2A0A:EF40:8B9:D701:25F7:6692:257A:7F6
470:Template:WikiProject Military history
7:
2289:Casualties not displaying in article
831:This article is within the scope of
721:Japanese military history task force
673:European military history task force
2352:Knowledge vital articles in History
657:Chinese military history task force
641:British military history task force
364:It is of interest to the following
102:for discussing improvements to the
705:German military history task force
689:French military history task force
14:
2372:B-Class military history articles
2367:C-Class vital articles in History
1972:and modifying the vulnerability?
1113:From top to bottom, left to right
625:Asian military history task force
2347:Knowledge level-4 vital articles
2220:
2175:
1832:
1735:
1704:
1646:
1544:Boxer rebellion SLNSW 457281.jpg
1331:, an image simply depicting the
1101:
1092:
1081:
1072:
1061:
1052:
818:
808:
787:
572:
561:
550:
539:
528:
440:
377:
344:
335:
304:
124:Click here to start a new topic.
62:
871:This article has been rated as
487:This article has been rated as
2477:C-Class China-related articles
2357:C-Class level-4 vital articles
1466:Venezuelan crisis of 1902–1903
1303:War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)
1:
1470:Russian invasion of Manchuria
1255:File:Boxer-tianjing-left.jpeg
845:and see a list of open tasks.
121:Put new text under old text.
2337:Old requests for peer review
2251:sources first and foremost.
2008:Thank you for explaining it.
450:Military history WikiProject
2322:01:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
2303:01:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
2198:to reactivate your request.
2186:has been answered. Set the
1758:to reactivate your request.
1746:has been answered. Set the
1669:to reactivate your request.
1657:has been answered. Set the
1597:17:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1560:17:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1536:15:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1478:British expedition to Tibet
1452:13:39, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1427:13:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1408:13:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1390:13:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
1365:13:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
851:Knowledge:WikiProject China
129:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
2508:
2492:WikiProject China articles
2279:01:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2265:01:28, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2246:01:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2215:01:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2138:04:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2124:03:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2105:03:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2076:04:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2055:03:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2021:03:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2004:02:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1982:02:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1964:02:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1945:01:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1930:01:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1912:01:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1897:01:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1878:01:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1855:00:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1824:01:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1809:00:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1791:00:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1775:23:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1285:20:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1267:20:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1245:20:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1226:20:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1212:20:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1194:20:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
943:13:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
928:16:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
913:15:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
877:project's importance scale
854:Template:WikiProject China
533:Referencing and citation:
2317:
2260:
2241:
2119:
2050:
1999:
1959:
1925:
1892:
1850:
1804:
1675:Please remove the errant
1589:
1444:
1382:
1280:
1240:
1207:
1160:
1126:
1046:
1028:16:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
1014:16:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
980:23:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
870:
803:
767:
751:
735:
719:
703:
687:
671:
655:
639:
623:
594:
486:
473:military history articles
435:
372:
159:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:
18:
1722:04:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
1698:03:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
1548:Boxer-tianjing-left.jpeg
1347:if you are ok with that
962:13:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
599:Associated task forces:
544:Coverage and accuracy:
2342:C-Class vital articles
1570:
857:China-related articles
764:
748:
732:
716:
700:
684:
668:
652:
636:
620:
577:Supporting materials:
505:
154:avoid personal attacks
2039:neutral point of view
1569:
1166:Eight-Nation Alliance
763:
747:
731:
715:
699:
683:
667:
651:
635:
619:
504:
351:level-4 vital article
298:Auto-archiving period
179:Neutral point of view
2035:no original research
422:Russian & Soviet
184:No original research
1486:Maji Maji Rebellion
1460:use illustrations.
1341:over simplification
1311:who the Boxers were
566:Grammar and style:
519:for B-class status:
2025:Editing works via
1714:Hyphenation Expert
1684:ff.}}</ref: -->
1571:
1493:Russo-Japanese War
1474:Battle of Kousséri
765:
749:
733:
717:
701:
685:
669:
653:
637:
621:
506:
455:list of open tasks
360:content assessment
165:dispute resolution
126:
23:Article milestones
2202:
2201:
1762:
1761:
1673:
1672:
1345:over complication
1289:I agree with you
1173:
1172:
1156:
1155:
891:
890:
887:
886:
883:
882:
834:WikiProject China
782:
781:
778:
777:
774:
773:
590:
589:
491:on the project's
459:full instructions
329:
328:
145:Assume good faith
122:
93:
92:
87:September 7, 2007
83:September 7, 2006
57:
56:
41:February 16, 2008
2499:
2319:
2314:
2262:
2257:
2243:
2238:
2230:reliable sources
2224:
2223:
2193:
2189:
2179:
2178:
2172:
2121:
2116:
2052:
2047:
2001:
1996:
1961:
1956:
1927:
1922:
1894:
1889:
1852:
1847:
1836:
1835:
1806:
1801:
1753:
1749:
1739:
1738:
1732:
1712:
1708:
1707:
1685:
1678:
1664:
1660:
1650:
1649:
1643:
1595:
1593:
1587:
1583:
1450:
1448:
1442:
1438:
1388:
1386:
1380:
1376:
1337:over simplifying
1282:
1277:
1242:
1237:
1209:
1204:
1128:
1127:
1105:
1096:
1085:
1076:
1065:
1056:
1039:
968:original infobox
859:
858:
855:
852:
849:
828:
823:
822:
821:
812:
805:
804:
799:
791:
784:
606:
596:
580:
576:
575:
569:
565:
564:
558:
554:
553:
547:
543:
542:
536:
532:
531:
510:
475:
474:
471:
468:
465:
464:Military history
444:
437:
436:
431:
428:
385:Military history
381:
374:
357:
348:
347:
340:
339:
331:
323:
309:
308:
299:
258:
257:
243:
174:Article policies
95:
66:
43:
20:
16:
2507:
2506:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2327:
2326:
2310:
2291:
2253:
2234:
2228:please provide
2221:
2191:
2187:
2176:
2170:
2112:
2043:
1992:
1952:
1918:
1885:
1843:
1833:
1797:
1751:
1747:
1736:
1730:
1705:
1703:
1682:
1676:
1662:
1658:
1647:
1641:
1585:
1579:
1577:
1552:LuxembourgLover
1458:Boxer Rebellion
1440:
1434:
1432:
1378:
1372:
1370:
1329:LuxembourgLover
1322:Boxer Rebellion
1315:conflict itself
1273:
1259:LuxembourgLover
1233:
1218:LuxembourgLover
1200:
1186:LuxembourgLover
1144:
1122:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1098:
1097:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1078:
1077:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1058:
1057:
1042:Boxer Rebellion
972:LuxembourgLover
920:LuxembourgLover
901:
856:
853:
850:
847:
846:
824:
819:
817:
797:
604:
578:
573:
567:
562:
556:
551:
545:
540:
534:
529:
472:
469:
466:
463:
462:
429:
387:
358:on Knowledge's
355:
345:
325:
324:
319:
296:
200:
195:
194:
193:
170:
140:
104:Boxer Rebellion
39:
12:
11:
5:
2505:
2503:
2495:
2494:
2489:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2459:
2454:
2449:
2444:
2439:
2434:
2429:
2424:
2419:
2414:
2409:
2404:
2399:
2394:
2389:
2384:
2379:
2374:
2369:
2364:
2359:
2354:
2349:
2344:
2339:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2324:
2290:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2200:
2199:
2180:
2169:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2064:
2061:
2009:
1969:
1865:
1861:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1760:
1759:
1740:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1671:
1670:
1651:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1623:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1574:rule of thirds
1540:
1539:
1538:
1516:
1510:
1499:
1496:
1395:
1352:
1325:
1318:
1306:
1214:
1182:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1153:
1152:Allied victory
1150:
1146:
1145:
1143:Northern China
1142:
1140:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1124:
1123:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1100:
1099:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1080:
1079:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1060:
1059:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1002:Boxer movement
986:Boxer movement
950:Boxer movement
945:
930:
900:
897:
895:
889:
888:
885:
884:
881:
880:
873:Top-importance
869:
863:
862:
860:
843:the discussion
830:
829:
813:
801:
800:
798:Top‑importance
792:
780:
779:
776:
775:
772:
771:
766:
756:
755:
750:
740:
739:
734:
724:
723:
718:
708:
707:
702:
692:
691:
686:
676:
675:
670:
660:
659:
654:
644:
643:
638:
628:
627:
622:
612:
611:
609:
607:
601:
600:
592:
591:
588:
587:
585:
583:
582:
581:
570:
559:
548:
537:
523:
522:
520:
507:
497:
496:
485:
479:
478:
476:
445:
433:
432:
382:
370:
369:
363:
341:
327:
326:
317:
315:
314:
311:
310:
260:
259:
197:
196:
192:
191:
186:
181:
172:
171:
169:
168:
161:
156:
147:
141:
139:
138:
127:
118:
117:
114:
113:
107:
91:
90:
77:On this day...
67:
59:
58:
55:
54:
51:
44:
36:
35:
32:
29:
25:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2504:
2493:
2490:
2488:
2485:
2483:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2465:
2463:
2460:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2443:
2440:
2438:
2435:
2433:
2430:
2428:
2425:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2410:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2395:
2393:
2390:
2388:
2385:
2383:
2380:
2378:
2375:
2373:
2370:
2368:
2365:
2363:
2360:
2358:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2345:
2343:
2340:
2338:
2335:
2334:
2332:
2323:
2320:
2315:
2313:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2295:103.4.155.127
2288:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2263:
2258:
2256:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2244:
2239:
2237:
2231:
2227:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2197:
2194:parameter to
2185:
2181:
2174:
2173:
2167:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2122:
2117:
2115:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2062:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2053:
2048:
2046:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2031:verifiability
2028:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2002:
1997:
1995:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1970:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1962:
1957:
1955:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1928:
1923:
1921:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1890:
1888:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1853:
1848:
1846:
1839:
1831:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1807:
1802:
1800:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1757:
1754:parameter to
1745:
1741:
1734:
1733:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1686:
1680:
1677:</ref: -->
1668:
1665:parameter to
1656:
1652:
1645:
1644:
1638:
1633:
1629:
1624:
1598:
1594:
1592:
1584:
1582:
1575:
1568:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1447:
1439:
1437:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1396:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1385:
1377:
1375:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1307:
1304:
1300:
1299:Iran–Iraq War
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1278:
1276:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1243:
1238:
1236:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1205:
1203:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1159:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1125:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1104:
1095:
1084:
1075:
1064:
1055:
1045:
1040:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
982:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
946:
944:
940:
936:
931:
929:
925:
921:
917:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
898:
896:
893:
878:
874:
868:
865:
864:
861:
844:
840:
836:
835:
827:
816:
814:
811:
807:
806:
802:
796:
793:
790:
786:
770:
762:
758:
757:
754:
746:
742:
741:
738:
730:
726:
725:
722:
714:
710:
709:
706:
698:
694:
693:
690:
682:
678:
677:
674:
666:
662:
661:
658:
650:
646:
645:
642:
634:
630:
629:
626:
618:
614:
613:
610:
608:
603:
602:
597:
593:
586:
584:
579:criterion met
571:
568:criterion met
560:
557:criterion met
549:
546:criterion met
538:
535:criterion met
527:
526:
525:
524:
521:
518:
517:
511:
508:
503:
499:
498:
494:
493:quality scale
490:
484:
481:
480:
477:
460:
456:
452:
451:
446:
443:
439:
438:
434:
427:
426:United States
423:
419:
418:North America
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
386:
383:
380:
376:
371:
367:
361:
353:
352:
342:
338:
333:
332:
313:
312:
307:
303:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
261:
256:
252:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
206:
203:
202:Find sources:
199:
198:
190:
189:Verifiability
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
175:
166:
162:
160:
157:
155:
151:
148:
146:
143:
142:
136:
132:
131:Learn to edit
128:
125:
120:
119:
116:
115:
111:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
84:
80:
78:
72:
68:
65:
61:
60:
52:
50:
49:
45:
42:
38:
37:
33:
30:
27:
26:
21:
17:
2311:
2292:
2254:
2235:
2225:
2203:
2195:
2184:edit request
2113:
2044:
1993:
1953:
1919:
1886:
1844:
1837:
1798:
1763:
1755:
1744:edit request
1709:
1687:
1681:
1674:
1666:
1655:edit request
1590:
1580:
1489:
1461:
1445:
1435:
1383:
1373:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1314:
1310:
1274:
1234:
1201:
1161:Belligerents
1112:
902:
894:
892:
872:
832:
826:China portal
514:
488:
448:
366:WikiProjects
349:
301:
263:
250:
244:
236:
229:
223:
217:
211:
201:
173:
98:This is the
74:
46:
2128:Yes, sure.
1690:76.14.122.5
1482:Herero Wars
1419:JArthur1984
1295:World War I
1020:JArthur1984
998:JArthur1984
994:JArthur1984
935:JArthur1984
555:Structure:
227:free images
110:not a forum
48:Peer review
2331:Categories
2188:|answered=
1748:|answered=
1679:tag here:
1659:|answered=
1528:ReidLark1n
1400:ReidLark1n
1357:ReidLark1n
1333:The Boxers
1006:ReidLark1n
954:ReidLark1n
81:column on
2226:Not done:
2027:consensus
1838:Not done:
1415:Boy's Own
1134:1899–1901
1004:picture?
990:Parsecboy
354:is rated
167:if needed
150:Be polite
100:talk page
71:Main Page
2312:Remsense
2255:Remsense
2236:Remsense
2114:Remsense
2045:Remsense
1994:Remsense
1954:Remsense
1920:Remsense
1887:Remsense
1845:Remsense
1799:Remsense
1581:Remsense
1462:See, e.g
1436:Remsense
1374:Remsense
1349:Remsense
1313:and the
1291:Remsense
1275:Remsense
1235:Remsense
1202:Remsense
1139:Location
516:criteria
414:Japanese
402:European
265:Archives
135:get help
108:This is
106:article.
53:Reviewed
2271:Asdfa06
2207:Asdfa06
2130:Asdfa06
2097:Asdfa06
2068:Asdfa06
2033:, with
2013:Asdfa06
1974:Asdfa06
1937:Asdfa06
1904:Asdfa06
1870:Asdfa06
1816:Asdfa06
1783:Asdfa06
1767:Asdfa06
1490:But see
899:Picture
875:on the
489:B-class
430:B‑class
398:Chinese
394:British
356:C-class
302:90Â days
233:WPÂ refs
221:scholar
73:in the
31:Process
1522:(from
1505:(from
1484:, and
1301:, and
1169:Boxers
1149:Result
410:German
406:French
362:scale.
205:Google
85:, and
34:Result
2192:|ans=
2182:This
2087:this.
1752:|ans=
1742:This
1663:|ans=
1653:This
1253:and
848:China
839:China
795:China
390:Asian
343:This
270:Index
248:JSTOR
209:books
163:Seek
2299:talk
2275:talk
2211:talk
2134:talk
2101:talk
2072:talk
2017:talk
1978:talk
1941:talk
1908:talk
1874:talk
1820:talk
1787:talk
1771:talk
1718:talk
1710:Done
1694:talk
1632:talk
1556:talk
1532:talk
1423:talk
1404:talk
1361:talk
1343:and
1263:talk
1222:talk
1190:talk
1131:Date
1024:talk
1010:talk
976:talk
958:talk
939:talk
924:talk
909:talk
241:FENS
215:news
152:and
28:Date
2190:or
2091:it.
1750:or
1661:or
1518:3.
1512:2.
1501:1.
867:Top
255:TWL
2333::
2301:)
2277:)
2213:)
2196:no
2136:)
2103:)
2074:)
2019:)
1980:)
1943:)
1910:)
1876:)
1822:)
1789:)
1773:)
1756:no
1720:)
1696:)
1688:.
1667:no
1628:ch
1586:‥
1558:)
1534:)
1526:)
1488:.
1480:,
1476:,
1472:,
1468:,
1464:.
1441:‥
1425:)
1406:)
1379:‥
1363:)
1297:,
1265:)
1224:)
1192:)
1115::
1026:)
1012:)
978:)
960:)
941:)
926:)
911:)
605:/
424:/
420:/
416:/
412:/
408:/
404:/
400:/
396:/
392:/
388::
300::
292:,
288:,
284:,
280:,
276:,
272:,
235:)
133:;
2318:诉
2297:(
2273:(
2261:诉
2242:诉
2209:(
2132:(
2120:诉
2099:(
2070:(
2051:诉
2015:(
2000:诉
1976:(
1960:诉
1939:(
1926:诉
1906:(
1893:诉
1872:(
1851:诉
1818:(
1805:诉
1785:(
1769:(
1716:(
1692:(
1634:)
1630:(
1591:诉
1554:(
1530:(
1509:)
1495:.
1446:诉
1421:(
1402:(
1384:诉
1359:(
1317:.
1281:诉
1261:(
1241:诉
1220:(
1208:诉
1188:(
1022:(
1008:(
974:(
956:(
937:(
922:(
907:(
879:.
495:.
483:B
461:.
368::
294:6
290:5
286:4
282:3
278:2
274:1
267::
251:·
245:·
237:·
230:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
207:(
137:.
89:.
79:"
75:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
