327:
377:
359:
387:
199:
265:
241:
147:
105:
21:
161:
136:
275:
577:
already started a COI noticeboard that was resolved weeks ago. He has not only been making tendentious edits obsessively that contradict the cited sources for weeks in the BLP, but has also many times over inserted subjective opinions and language about the subject, libelous and unsourced statements,
461:
I am personally of the opinion that this article should be deleted; it is a clear example of trying to abuse
Knowledge as a tool for self-promotion, and the accomplishments of this individual are, while interesting on their own merits, frankly not that noteworthy. Do we really need articles for every
493:
Overall, I feel that this article is very clearly intended as a vehicle for inflating this person's accomplishments beyond their actual significance. Again- said accomplishments are interesting on their own merits, but they are nowhere near ground-breaking enough to merit a
Knowledge page, at least
486:
3. The note about the CRISPR enzymes this person helped discover (note that the original version of the article had them claiming sole credit for the discovery, when they were, in fact, co-first author on the publication) being licensed by
Mammoth Biosciences reads like an attempt to inflate the
479:
1. The first line of the article states that the company which this individual co-founded was funded for $ 26 million; why is this information noteworthy? I can see no reason to include it other than to make the company sound impressive.
578:
and personal attacks against both the subject and other users (in addition to obvious forum-shopping). He has also stated his involvement in the subject's field and the subject's location that should be considered a direct COI.
667:
341:
662:
490:
4. The Forbes 30 Under 30 section very much comes across as an attempt at self-promotion. We don't have articles for every person who has ever been listed; why should we have one for this person?
513:
I would like to get the opinion of a senior editor about whether this article violates
Knowledge's rules on notability and self-promotion; I would also like them to weigh in as to whether
550:- article is at AFD which will decide if it is notable or not. And RfCs are not meant for comments about users, there are noticeboards for that. This RfC should be withdrawn and closed.
172:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
336:
251:
84:
672:
647:
687:
637:
433:
89:
173:
168:
141:
72:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
476:
Elaborating on my previous post: I believe this article violates
Knowledge's rules re: notability and self-promotion. I base this on the following:
439:
677:
293:
64:
657:
682:
297:
483:
2. Why is it necessary to note this person's status as an NSF Fellow here? How is this relevant? This is not LinkedIn, this is
Knowledge.
223:
409:
301:
652:
292:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
642:
462:
person who gets their graduate dissertation work published in a prestigious scientific journal(s) and founds a biotech startup?
146:
288:
246:
48:
40:
32:
536:
400:
364:
116:
217:
73:
104:
583:
122:
558:
524:
83:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
408:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
607:
213:
87:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
326:
579:
532:
514:
499:
467:
280:
571:
551:
80:
509:
RfC Re: notability, self-promotion, and COI issues with this article and associated users
376:
358:
392:
631:
602:
518:
574:
528:
495:
463:
386:
264:
240:
20:
382:
270:
198:
622:
587:
565:
540:
503:
471:
405:
601:: If you think the subject matter isn't notable then nominate it for
160:
135:
300:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
521:
should be investigated regarding a possible conflict of interest.
98:
79:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
56:
15:
325:
197:
47:
here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or
19:
668:
Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
208:
44:
663:
Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
404:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
438:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
182:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation
522:
353:
235:
185:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation
166:This article was reviewed by member(s) of
130:
102:
673:Science and academia work group articles
355:
237:
132:
29:Individuals with a conflict of interest
648:AfC submissions by date/19 August 2022
45:request corrections or suggest content
39:not to directly edit the article. See
7:
398:This article is within the scope of
286:This article is within the scope of
688:Unknown-importance science articles
638:Biography articles of living people
337:the science and academia work group
121:It is of interest to the following
14:
169:WikiProject Articles for creation
457:Does this article need to exist?
385:
375:
357:
273:
263:
239:
159:
145:
134:
103:
62:This article must adhere to the
35:the subject of the article, are
487:significance of the discovery.
310:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
206:This article was accepted from
678:WikiProject Biography articles
623:09:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
588:04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
566:08:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
541:23:37, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
313:Template:WikiProject Biography
212:on 19 August 2022 by reviewer
41:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
1:
658:Stub-Class biography articles
605:. RfCs aren't were it is at.
504:08:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
418:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
412:and see a list of open tasks.
334:This article is supported by
65:biographies of living persons
421:Template:WikiProject Science
298:contribute to the discussion
683:Stub-Class science articles
472:01:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
77:must be removed immediately
704:
440:project's importance scale
437:
370:
333:
258:
205:
154:
129:
653:Accepted AfC submissions
643:Stub-Class AfC articles
51:if the issue is urgent.
330:
202:
111:This article is rated
24:
329:
289:WikiProject Biography
201:
179:Articles for creation
176:for more information.
142:Articles for creation
31:, particularly those
23:
252:Science and Academia
401:WikiProject Science
331:
316:biography articles
203:
117:content assessment
25:
543:
527:comment added by
515:User:Xerxescience
454:
453:
450:
449:
446:
445:
352:
351:
348:
347:
234:
233:
230:
229:
97:
96:
55:
54:
695:
595:Procedural close
426:
425:
424:science articles
422:
419:
416:
395:
390:
389:
379:
372:
371:
361:
354:
318:
317:
314:
311:
308:
294:join the project
283:
281:Biography portal
278:
277:
276:
267:
260:
259:
254:
243:
236:
211:
190:
189:
186:
183:
180:
163:
156:
155:
150:
149:
148:
138:
131:
114:
108:
107:
99:
85:this noticeboard
57:
37:strongly advised
16:
703:
702:
698:
697:
696:
694:
693:
692:
628:
627:
511:
459:
423:
420:
417:
414:
413:
391:
384:
315:
312:
309:
306:
305:
279:
274:
272:
249:
207:
187:
184:
181:
178:
177:
144:
115:on Knowledge's
112:
12:
11:
5:
701:
699:
691:
690:
685:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
630:
629:
626:
625:
592:
591:
590:
510:
507:
494:in my opinion.
458:
455:
452:
451:
448:
447:
444:
443:
436:
430:
429:
427:
410:the discussion
397:
396:
393:Science portal
380:
368:
367:
362:
350:
349:
346:
345:
342:Low-importance
332:
322:
321:
319:
285:
284:
268:
256:
255:
244:
232:
231:
228:
227:
204:
194:
193:
191:
164:
152:
151:
139:
127:
126:
120:
109:
95:
94:
90:this help page
74:poorly sourced
60:
53:
52:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
700:
689:
686:
684:
681:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
635:
633:
624:
621:
620:
619:
616:
613:
610:
604:
600:
596:
593:
589:
585:
581:
576:
573:
569:
568:
567:
564:
563:
562:
557:
556:
555:
549:
546:
545:
544:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
520:
519:User:Pantrail
516:
508:
506:
505:
501:
497:
491:
488:
484:
481:
477:
474:
473:
469:
465:
456:
441:
435:
432:
431:
428:
411:
407:
403:
402:
394:
388:
383:
381:
378:
374:
373:
369:
366:
363:
360:
356:
343:
340:(assessed as
339:
338:
328:
324:
323:
320:
303:
302:documentation
299:
295:
291:
290:
282:
271:
269:
266:
262:
261:
257:
253:
248:
245:
242:
238:
225:
222:
219:
215:
214:Theroadislong
210:
200:
196:
195:
192:
175:
171:
170:
165:
162:
158:
157:
153:
143:
140:
137:
133:
128:
124:
118:
110:
106:
101:
100:
92:
91:
86:
82:
78:
75:
71:
67:
66:
61:
59:
58:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
30:
27:
22:
18:
17:
617:
614:
611:
608:
606:
598:
594:
580:Xerxescience
575:User:Xardwen
560:
559:
553:
552:
547:
523:— Preceding
512:
492:
489:
485:
482:
478:
475:
460:
399:
335:
287:
220:
188:AfC articles
174:project page
167:
123:WikiProjects
88:
76:
69:
63:
36:
33:representing
28:
632:Categories
572:Isaidnoway
554:Isaidnoway
209:this draft
113:Stub-class
49:contact us
43:. You may
307:Biography
247:Biography
81:libellous
537:contribs
525:unsigned
224:contribs
599:Bad RfC
548:Bad RfC
529:Xardwen
496:Xardwen
464:Xardwen
415:Science
406:Science
365:Science
603:WP:AFD
561:(talk)
119:scale.
618:Path
584:talk
533:talk
517:and
500:talk
468:talk
296:and
218:talk
615:hed
612:nis
609:Tar
434:???
70:BLP
634::
586:)
539:)
535:•
502:)
470:)
344:).
250::
226:).
597:/
582:(
570:@
531:(
498:(
466:(
442:.
304:.
221:·
216:(
125::
93:.
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
