Knowledge

Talk:BlooP and FlooP

Source 📝

95: 77: 50: 21: 31: 249: 143: 149: 215:
I think this page should probably talk about GlooP, given that GlooP is practically the entire reason these two languages were in the book, AFAICT.
244: 119: 254: 102: 82: 57: 27: 115: 63: 200: 221: 20: 225: 176:
Floop and Bloop are notable enough for me. In other words: I referenced this article, coming from
118:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
185: 180:. I'm going to remove the tag. It's still a stub, perhaps, but the links help etc etc. Bill 196: 218:
Even though GlooP isn't very well-defined, some stuff could still be discussed about it.
238: 181: 94: 76: 177: 111: 107: 229: 204: 189: 195:
Ooops, it looks like a similar action on my part got delayed.
43: 15: 106:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 56:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's 148:This article has not yet received a rating on the 8: 71: 49: 47: 167:Sufficient notability to remove the flag 73: 30:on 13 August 2011 (UTC). The result of 250:Unknown-importance Computing articles 7: 100:This article is within the scope of 62:It is of interest to the following 14: 93: 75: 48: 19: 128:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 26:This article was nominated for 131:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 245:Unassessed Computing articles 122:and see a list of open tasks. 205:00:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 190:23:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 271: 150:project's importance scale 147: 88: 70: 230:05:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC) 255:All Computing articles 116:information technology 172:Sufficient notability 103:WikiProject Computing 134:Computing articles 58:content assessment 164: 163: 160: 159: 156: 155: 42: 41: 262: 136: 135: 132: 129: 126: 97: 90: 89: 79: 72: 53: 52: 51: 44: 23: 16: 270: 269: 265: 264: 263: 261: 260: 259: 235: 234: 213: 174: 169: 133: 130: 127: 124: 123: 12: 11: 5: 268: 266: 258: 257: 252: 247: 237: 236: 212: 209: 208: 207: 173: 170: 168: 165: 162: 161: 158: 157: 154: 153: 146: 140: 139: 137: 120:the discussion 98: 86: 85: 80: 68: 67: 61: 54: 40: 39: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 267: 256: 253: 251: 248: 246: 243: 242: 240: 233: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 187: 183: 179: 171: 166: 151: 145: 142: 141: 138: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 104: 99: 96: 92: 91: 87: 84: 81: 78: 74: 69: 65: 59: 55: 46: 45: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 220: 217: 214: 175: 101: 64:WikiProjects 35: 239:Categories 197:Derek farn 222:Blitzer99 178:Recursion 125:Computing 112:computing 108:computers 83:Computing 232:Agreed! 182:Wvbailey 28:deletion 114:, and 60:scale. 211:GlooP 226:talk 201:talk 186:talk 36:keep 34:was 144:??? 241:: 228:) 203:) 188:) 110:, 224:( 199:( 184:( 152:. 66:: 38:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Computing
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Computing
computers
computing
information technology
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
Recursion
Wvbailey
talk
23:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Derek farn
talk
00:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Blitzer99
talk
05:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories
Unassessed Computing articles
Unknown-importance Computing articles
All Computing articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.