Knowledge

Talk:Green Day/GA1

Source 📝

97: 471: 448: 434: 403: 379: 352: 342: 304: 290: 276: 171: 157: 230:
By October 2007, Armstrong had 45 songs written, but the band showed no further signs of progress until October 2008, when a video of the group recording with producer Butch Vig in the studio was posted on YouTube. Two videos showing the band in the studio were posted on YouTube. In the tour section
479:
OK, the prose could do with a thorough copyedit and there are some dead links that need looking at, also the citation style is inconsistent at present. When that is sorted out I will take another look, until then on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be informed.
236:
Overall, the article isin fairly good shape, but a thorough copy-edit would be good to tie togerher material that has been added by a range of editors. I have pointed out some examples above but scrutiny of the entire text and copy-editing would make it work
112:. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of January 14, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from 84: 231:
of the band's official website, the message "World Tour coming soon!" is shown. The writing and recording process, spanning three years and four recording studios, was finally finished in April 2009.
109: 214:
The band chose not to try to re-create the stolen album, but instead started over. By the end of 2003, Green Day collaborated with Iggy Pop on two tracks for his album Skull Ring.
135: 129: 66: 523:
Whilst there have been a few minor amendments the article has not substantially improved so as it has been 9days, I am delisting.
426: 62: 321:
Inconsistency in citation styles needs to be rectified, some are just bare urls, some are properly formatted inline citations.
296: 47: 39: 249:: The present structure of two short paras and one long is a little lopsidede. Could it be arranged more evenly? 163: 506:
I've been meaning to clear this article up. I might be able to get to it later this week, but that's tentative.
262: 101: 204:
Insomniac was a much darker and heavier response by the band, compared to the poppier, more melodic Dookie.
116:. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at 528: 511: 485: 182:
Its early releases for independent record label Lookout! Records earned them a grassroots fanbase, ...
524: 507: 481: 416: 222:
do we know where? or is this the venue in the enxt entence. This could do with tidying up.
220:
and the United Kingdom, where they drew a crowd of 130,000 people over a span of two days.
105: 309:
Reference #3 doesn't link to the right article, it might be somewhere there on the site.
365: 55: 17: 96: 440: 121: 117: 282: 113: 120:. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at 32: 233:. I think this section needs tidying up to remove repetition and clarify. 532: 515: 489: 104:, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the 226:
Foxboro Hot Tubs and 21st Century Breakdown: 2007–present
74: 43: 195:four sentences in the last paragraph start with 210:American Idiot and renewed success: 2003–2006 8: 425:(images are tagged and non-free images have 83:Starting GA reassessment as part of the 186:Its -them, confusion of pronouns here. 7: 216:The tag should perhaps be addressed. 199:, a little variation would be good. 420:, where possible and appropriate. 24: 469: 446: 432: 401: 377: 374:Fair representation without bias 350: 340: 302: 288: 274: 169: 155: 95: 303: 289: 275: 191:Breakthrough success: 1994–1996 170: 156: 1: 315:Reference #21 is a dead link. 110:GA project quality task force 533:01:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 470: 447: 433: 402: 378: 351: 341: 312:Reference #8 is a dead link. 91:Checking against GA criteria 516:04:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 490:20:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 318:Reference #11 is a deadlink 551: 100:To uphold the quality of 145:reasonably well written 102:Knowledge:Good articles 439:(appropriate use with 414:It is illustrated by 366:neutral point of view 330:broad in its coverage 427:fair use rationales 398:No edit wars, etc. 258:factually accurate 441:suitable captions 206:response to what? 542: 473: 472: 450: 449: 436: 435: 405: 404: 381: 380: 354: 353: 344: 343: 306: 305: 292: 291: 283:reliable sources 278: 277: 173: 172: 159: 158: 99: 79: 70: 51: 550: 549: 545: 544: 543: 541: 540: 539: 363:It follows the 337:(major aspects) 108:as part of the 93: 60: 37: 31: 29: 27:GA Reassessment 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 548: 546: 538: 537: 536: 535: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 477: 476: 475: 474: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 281:(citations to 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 223: 217: 207: 201: 188: 140: 139: 92: 89: 80: 28: 25: 23: 18:Talk:Green Day 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 547: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 513: 509: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 487: 483: 467: 464: 463: 461: 458: 452: 451: 444: 442: 430: 428: 422: 421: 419: 418: 413: 407: 406: 399: 396: 395: 393: 389: 383: 382: 375: 372: 371: 369: 367: 362: 356: 355: 348: 338: 334: 333: 331: 327: 320: 317: 314: 311: 308: 307: 300: 298: 286: 284: 272: 268: 267: 265: 264: 259: 255: 248: 245: 244: 243: 242: 235: 232: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 200: 198: 192: 189: 187: 184: 183: 178: 175: 174: 167: 165: 153: 149: 148: 146: 142: 141: 138:for criteria) 137: 133: 131: 127: 126: 125: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 90: 88: 86: 81: 78: 77: 73: 68: 64: 59: 58: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 35: 26: 19: 505: 478: 465: 459: 438: 424: 415: 397: 391: 373: 364: 346: 336: 329: 294: 280: 271:(references) 270: 261: 257: 246: 229: 225: 219: 213: 209: 203: 196: 194: 190: 185: 181: 180: 176: 161: 151: 144: 128: 94: 82: 75: 71: 57:Article talk 56: 52: 33: 30: 525:Jezhotwells 508:WesleyDodds 482:Jezhotwells 106:GA criteria 44:visual edit 263:verifiable 466:Pass/Fail 347:(focused) 87:process. 85:GA Sweeps 197:Imsoniac 460:Overall 237:better. 152:(prose) 67:history 48:history 34:Article 417:images 392:stable 390:It is 368:policy 328:It is 256:It is 143:It is 132:review 122:WP:GAR 118:WP:GAN 134:(see 114:WP:GA 76:Watch 16:< 529:talk 512:talk 486:talk 260:and 247:Lead 177:Lead 136:here 63:edit 40:edit 164:MoS 124:. 531:) 514:) 488:) 468:: 462:: 445:: 437:b 431:: 423:a 400:: 394:. 376:: 370:. 349:: 345:b 339:: 335:a 332:. 301:: 297:OR 293:c 287:: 279:b 273:: 269:a 266:. 228:: 212:: 193:: 179:: 168:: 160:b 154:: 150:a 147:. 130:GA 65:| 46:| 42:| 527:( 510:( 484:( 443:) 429:) 299:) 295:( 285:) 166:) 162:( 72:· 69:) 61:( 53:· 50:) 38:(

Index

Talk:Green Day
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
GA Sweeps

Knowledge:Good articles
GA criteria
GA project quality task force
WP:GA
WP:GAN
WP:GAR
GA
here
MoS
verifiable
reliable sources
OR
neutral point of view
images
fair use rationales
suitable captions
Jezhotwells
talk
20:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.