Knowledge

Talk:DVB-H

Source đź“ť

1433:(actually, they seem to be screen captures from some sort of presentation), which I think are not appropriate for wikipedia, since they contain logos which are trademarked and report BER vs. C/N results of which we do not know the source: remember that wikipedia is not a primary source. Worst, I'm not from Nokia or other TLC operators, at least I could have been paid for this :-) I don't see Nokia cited in the standard description (only in service launches and HW), whereas Alcatel is presented directly in the DVB-SH section and in the service tests ongoing in Italy, also. I checked the ETSI link you provided 1072:
However DVB forum is not willing to make those standards competing each other. That is was they are based on same stacks and fully compliants. That means it would be possible to complete a DVB-H network with DVB-SH or DVB-H2 repeaters. That is the reason they have to appear in the same page for the moment. It is also important to inform the readers of improvements. If you are interested, I can provide you the ETSI references for DVB-H and DVB-SH. You would be surprised. I am happy to discuss longer with you and I hope the discussion will be handled with neutrality and objectivity. --
74: 53: 265: 195: 185: 84: 158: 22: 301: 1010:
For U-Mobile and Smart, the regulation even disallowed the operators at the end to commercialize the service since the licenses have not been issued yet. In the mean time, DVB-SH is launched with ICO in US and S2M is going to deploy it in 19 countries. I also read that a DVB-SH trial with more than 200 transmitters is under deployment in Torino, Italy.
1436:: well, it says that "...It (DVB-SH) complements the existing DVB-H physical layer standard and like its sister specification (DVB-H) uses the DVB IP Datacast (IPDC) set of content delivery, electronic service guide and service purchase and protection standards ....". DVB-SH has a joint satellite-terrestrial mode, whereas DVB-H is only terrestrial. -- 971:
standards are quite different. Moreover, DVB-H exists and is operating in a number of countries, whereas DVB-SH is yet to come. Yet, I don't understand the Vaasa university matter: it is clear that a number of TLC industry insiders are trying to use this article to pump up one standard or another, but we cannot let do this. --
1475:
Note that the BER vs C/N results come from BMCO and are public. Actually SFR in France handled a field trial (6 months) and the results were better than the theory with a 7dbs gain on DVB-H. It is good anyway that the description of DVB-SH is in line with what is publicly published by the dvb entity.
1603:
then please do a DVB-H2 & DVB-T2 article, then I will do a DVB-SH one. the DVB-SH definitition is public and the text was a little bit modified. Besides it is public. How do you want to change this: "DVB-SH includes features such as turbo coding for forward error correction and a highly flexible
1370:
well, first you are wrong, secondly your article was full of technical misleading informations (even in DVB-H)before I corrected it and third I am sorry to say but the one that is defending DVB-H and promoting it is yourself. I even wondered whether you were working for Nokia or any telecom operator
1107:
DVB-H (EN 302 304) and DVB-SH (EN 302 583) are separate standards, but it is clear that they are closely related. One of two options should be chosen: 1) separate articles about each standard, with appropriate inter-linking; or 2) cover both standards in one article, but with a different title, e.g.
1089:
I don't want to be an oppositor against the merging of titles, but I notice that such a move should be discussed before, and after consensus is achieved, done. The opposite happened. Since wikipedia is not a primary source, we need to have clear references to ETSI or other technical pages from where
884:
DVB-H and DVB-SH are separate technical standards. Whilst DVB-SH builds on DVB-H, it should be seen as a complement for DVB-H, rather than a replacement. DVB-H is designed to be used in UHF (and VHF) frequencies, whilst DVB-SH is targeted at S-band spectrum. Whilst the information in this article is
1009:
I agree with you and I disagreed with Cantalamessa. DVB-H is widely deployed in Italy but nowhere else. In Philippines, Smart indeed launched a DVB-H service with Nokia but in Manila only and with 7 transmitters. Same story for VTC, with 9 transmitters. Same story for U-Mobile, with 7 transmitters.
791:
DVB-SH is for DVB-H what 3G is for GPRS: an enhansement of the standard. Unless there is a separate article for DVB-SH or DVB-H2, I would recommend to keep it in the same page for the moment. DVB forum is not willing to make the standards competeting against each other but timprove them. DVB-SH and
543:
it has been recently pointed out that, in the countries where DVB-H was first launched, it has not gained momentum at all. Maybe due to the lack of interest of mobile users in watching a low-def TV over a few inches screen, or whatever. Any comments on this? Should we discuss about that in the main
1349:
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that there is someone interested in using wikipedia as a promotional medium for his preferred standard. This whole thing is becoming ridiculous: there is a consensus in reverting to two different articles, but we all are afraid to set-up an edit-war against anonymi.
1071:
DVB-H is not a failure and DVB-SH is no longer in testing phase as well. DVB forum has been working on 2 enhansements of DVB-H. One is DVB-H2 which is going to be fully approved probably this year (with DVB-T2). The other is DVB-SH which was approved last year and is no longer in testing phase.
970:
No, in our opinion the two different names should not stay in the same title, since the majority of the standards reported in wikipedia are done in this way. You can well use a redirect from one term to another. If there is such improvement in using DVB-SH over DVB-H, this means that the two
1498:
Oh, yes, and very probably we will also split DVB-T2 from DVB-T, as soon as the new standard will stand on its own. Clearly, you cannot remove the copyviol template in the main text: that text should be modified and differentiated from the DVB report or we are forced to delete it.
380:
I do not think listing the companies that have DVB-H products is an ad in any real way. This is useful information for anyone who wants additional information beyond the theory, and has many precedents in other pages (see e.g. the listing of H.264 hardware implementations in
1674:, according to the voting. I have also tried to remove formulations like "impressive improvements" - we should use as boring language as possible since this is a dictionary. :) I hope user Steppu75 is not too disappointed. We need your knowledge and contributions. The 1588:
I have no difficulty in splitting those articles, but remember that the main problem is the TITLE of this article. Moreover, you can't use text copypasted from DVB website, you cannot put again links that are not working, you cannot remove the disputed title template.
488:
I don't have more information than the one from the links at the entry. I just read all of them (well, I guess I must have missed the one with "DVB-H+" name in it :-). In a couple of days I'll try fix the wording, find more sources and expand the entry a little.
2093:
I think the first two should be kept, they come from the "father" organization of DVB-H and from the official regulatory body. The third one is problematic: should we also link, in the relevant articles, a list of DVB-T/DVB-S/DVB-C TV sets, too?
1427:
Unfortunately, I am not the author of this article, so I cannot defend it since I am not responsible of the technical details written in it. BTW, I don't think that there have ever been bad errors in it. What I see now, are a couple of figures
274: 168: 1964:
Please don't redirect DVB-SH articles to the DVB-H page. DVB-SH is a standard completely on its own, and even though it is influenced by DVB-T/H, it actually adopts elements from DVB-T/H, DVB-S2, and the 3GPP2 (3G) telephone standards. The
1631:
It is not sufficient to say that a text is public, it must be either public domain (which is not, I guess) or GFDL-compatible. You cannot remove the disputed title template. Instead of reverting, verify that the external links are working.
1224:
Sorry but Eoghan1, steppu75 and 2 anonymous users agreed on the opposite. MilesAgain also proposed an alternative title you disagreed. I also realized that one user that was also in line with steppu75 was removed from this discussion.
893:
This comment is not correct. DVB-SH supports all range of frequencies up to 3GHz. DVB-SH supports S-band but ALSO UHF. BMCO forum published results about DVB-SH in UHF with gain improvement of at least 5.5DBs to DVB-H.
467:
I see you have found better infos and are more expert than me. So I think it's better that you edit the article and not me. If you haven't time to do, please tell me your sources and I'll try to do this following your
2486: 279: 2014:
I updated the Modeo section. I also added the MediaFLO info; seeing as that is the only Mobile TV standard being used in the USA right now. But I'm sure the Wiki Gods will delete my updates, as they always do.....
2114:
keep links to relevant documents from the DVB group, which is the developing organization, and ETSI, which defines documents by the DVB group as European standards. So the first two references should definitely be
1309:
OK, you're right, but all stems from the fact that the article name has been moved without consensus. Anonymous IP may not be taken into account, since you cannot know whether there is one or many minds behind.
1371:
that already invested in a DVB-H network. For your information, I am not working for any Telco nor Network providers. So the only think I can promote, and i am proud of it, is the improvement of technologies.
2491: 437:
the first satellite is planned to be launched around Christmas 2009 (and not in year 2008 as stated) i.e. 2 years after availability of terrestrial transmitters which are expected around Christmas 2007
2481: 1476:
Note also there were referenced (5 & 6). By the way I disagree on your way to separate DVB-S from DVB-S2. It is not in line with what dvb forum is recommending.But this is another story...
1469:
indeed DVB-SH is an evolution of DVB-H with possibility of satellite-terrestrial mode. That is not new and is indeed a huge advantage and it is in line with the fact DVB-SH supports up to 3GHz.
394:
You are right, there are ads even on other wiki articles. In my opinion, that is wrong. Especially when the ad-like statement glorifies some quality of that product (not in this case, anyway).
1768:
The article should be moved back to its original name, DVB-H, after someone tried to rename it to a number of other complicated names. This is in accordance with related article names such as
1386:
3- this is indeed not a democracy and this is ridiculus to count pros and cons. Either we all agree on something or it is going nowhere.Being aggressiv as you are does not solve any issue.
1422:
you have not discussed in the talk your change immediately after doing it, but only when you have seen that there is a number of people that does not exactly think the same thing as you.
506:
I think it would be a good idea to upload pictures of some DVB-h phones. I have two DVB-h phones because I am a trialist, I could upload some amateur pictures also. Please let me know
949:
I also agree with this last comment. DVB-H and DVB-SH should be seen in the same title. DVB-SH is definitely an improvement of DVB-H in the UHF frequencies. I confirm BMCO endorsed it.
2213: 2317: 1822: 2466: 1054:
So, if DVB-H is a failure, we should move this to DVB-SH. Else, if DVB-SH is still in testing phase, we should move this to DVB-H, since it is fully operational in Europe. --
140: 130: 1969:
article may be misleading in that sense, but that is a problem of that article. Consequently, it is also inappropriate to declare DVB-SH as a standard derived from DVB-H in
1016:
So again, I disagree with the "DVB-SH is yet to come" and I fully agree with MilesAgain. We should continue this discussion and let appear both standard name in the title.
992:
because "evolution to DVB-SH" is a verb phrase. At present this article is very much about the standards and has hardly three sentences about the transitions between them.
1334:
Please explain to me why the article can not be devided into two articles. The DVB-H article may have a short DVB-SH section, that is refering to "Main article: DVB-SH".
556:
DVB_H is dead, but it may still be broadcast in a few places - It has been closed even in Nokia's home country Finland. DVB-H is hugely inefficient by modern standard.
430:
It's not an official DVB standard although at the moment there is a Study Mission (basically a group asked to look into a technical feasibility of such a system) called
1970: 1182:(I don't think that the other anonymous users can be counted, clearly) that wants a composite or different title. So, what you want to do, is making also the articles 652:
Please discuss here about the need to move this page to such a composite title: I see that DVB-SH is a different thing from DVB-H, and there may well be a redirect. --
1125:
I agree with you and I think DVB Mobile TV Standards is a very good title. If there is no extra comment on this, we will then modify the title based on your proposal.
885:
largely accurate, the title is mis-leading. It should either be titled DVB-H and DVB-SH, or consideration should be given to breaking it into two separate articles.
2399: 2395: 2381: 106: 2461: 1903:
There could be also the necessity to delete the other articles redirecting here, which were created with uncommon names. They are (in order of uncommonness):
2476: 255: 245: 2057:
Several of the external links were removed (which was reverted, and then reverted again). However, I suggest that at least the following should be kept:
2291: 2496: 97: 58: 2214:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100409072519/http://www.connectedtv.eu/ibc-dvb-t2-a-possible-home-for-the-dvbs-next-generation-handheld-standard-292/
931:
I disagree with this comment and since i am not from Vaasa university, Finland (;-)), I would recommend to mention DVB-H and DVB-SH in the title.
2297: 2501: 2318:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110724175729/http://www.kpn.com/corporate/overkpn/Perscentrum/nieuwsbericht/KPN-stopt-met-MobielTV-via-DVBH.htm
2307: 1023: 727: 217: 622:. You could have discussed in this page before doing such a move: DVB-H exists, whereas the "future enhancements" may be well a redirect. -- 2471: 2217: 2144: 1574: 1232: 1143: 315: 221: 2367: 2263: 2022: 1483: 444:
Please change the entry accordingly to reflect provided comments or I'll do it in about 2 weeks. Thank you. 19:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
2357: 521: 340: 2321: 2377:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2229: 459: 427:
and its aim is to expand DVB-H to S-Band (more specifically 2170-2200MHz) for both terrestrial and satellite mobile TV broadcasting.
2253: 757: 208: 163: 1910: 914:
OK, after reading a number of opinions, I think that we can safely rename the article to "DVB-H", with redirects from DVB-SH. --
2273: 1619: 1402: 721: 1678:
section is empty but should include a couple of sentences as a summary of the most important issues in the DVB-SH article.
773:
I think the article's title should be simply "DVB-H", since DVB-SH is a separate standard from DVB-H, as you can see here
2442: 2337: 1826: 33: 1258:
Sorry of what? Anonymous users cannot be counted in decisions and voting. There are precise guidelines saying that. --
1973:. I may update various DVB articles one day when I get to it, as many of them contain quite a bit of misinformation. 2292:
http://corporate.u.com.my/sec_press/pdf/News%20-%20070618%20Nokia%20MiTV%20MobTV%20announcement-vers-June18-7pm.pdf
1915: 1384:
2- you make an alternative proposal that does not mislead the readers and provide them a true and fair information.
431: 1183: 1731: 2398:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1538:
My conclosion is that a majority wanted to split the article into one DVB-H and one DVB-SH article. Am I right?
1187: 2347: 1838:. The conventional name should be capitalized, as it is done for all similar telecommunication standard names. 1027: 89: 2327: 1578: 1236: 1147: 792:
DVB-H2 soon are improvements of DVB-H, based on similar stacks and validated by ETSI. DVB-T is another story.
440:
planned satellite will cover only Western Europe with spot beams aimed at UK, Germany, France, Spain and Italy
2026: 2433: 2205: 1487: 1191: 517: 2298:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080326174241/http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=47573&sectionid=3510208
541: 455: 73: 52: 2308:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080531170522/http://www.kpn.com/corporate/nl/pers/persber.htm?contentid=4409
2099: 2042: 2000: 1955: 1937: 1843: 1707: 1651: 1637: 1594: 1558: 1523: 1516: 1504: 1460: 1453: 1441: 1434: 1355: 1315: 1263: 1203: 1095: 1059: 1043:
a single-purpouse account has modified the title of this article, and he is not here to support its choice
976: 938: 919: 901: 799: 781: 774: 745: 695: 679: 657: 642: 627: 416:
There is nothing called DVB-H+. Nobody calls it like that. If it is to be reffered to than always only as
344: 1195: 2417:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2405: 2218:
http://www.connectedtv.eu/ibc-dvb-t2-a-possible-home-for-the-dvbs-next-generation-handheld-standard-292/
2160: 1090:
it appears that DVB-H and DVB-SH are the same thing, otherwise I'm afraid we cannot keep them joined. --
690:], DVB-H and DVB-SH are different standards, the same difference that exists between DVB-T and DVB-H. -- 310: 39: 2368:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120426075150/http://www.digitag.org/WebLetters/2011/External-Nov2011.html
2204:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 513: 2264:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071011023014/http://www.dvb-h.org/Services/services-philippines-mytv.htm
2179: 2119: 1803:
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
950: 841:
were the same thing (or were similar enough to warrant a single article), the title should simply be "
561: 490: 451: 2018: 1607: 1570: 1479: 1390: 1228: 1139: 1019: 997: 956: 818: 733: 593:
There are various places where trials etc are referred to as "this year" or "will happen next year".
509: 447: 336: 2358:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061006210734/http://www.mdtvalliance.org/en/resources/publications.asp
21: 2301: 1611: 1394: 1179: 1126: 1073: 764: 710: 2322:
http://www.kpn.com/corporate/overkpn/Perscentrum/nieuwsbericht/KPN-stopt-met-MobielTV-via-DVBH.htm
2311: 1109: 886: 386: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2285: 2241: 2230:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070525174338/http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2069424.cms
2175: 1615: 1398: 1130: 1077: 715: 557: 2402:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2418: 2371: 2267: 2254:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110710212612/http://www.expway.com/telechargement/1221664059.pdf
2095: 2083: 2038: 1996: 1951: 1947: 1933: 1862: 1839: 1721: 1703: 1683: 1647: 1633: 1590: 1554: 1543: 1519: 1500: 1456: 1437: 1351: 1339: 1311: 1259: 1199: 1175: 1113: 1091: 1055: 972: 934: 915: 897: 868: 795: 777: 691: 675: 674:
are very, very similar, but they have different articles with tiles that are not composite. --
653: 638: 623: 545: 395: 372: 363: 200: 102: 1413:
Steppu, I think you were addressing me, though not directly did my name. I'm not aggressive:
1380:
I would then recommend you few things since you seem to spend most of your time in wikipedia:
2156: 1920: 1787: 989: 600: 472: 371:
More links have been added, and they are ads. I am thinking to remove them. Please discuss.
2425: 2274:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071114000130/http://www.smart.com.ph/Gold/FAQs/myTV_FAQs.htm
2128: 1980: 1163: 993: 814: 553:
Are you sure that 1 milion users on a costumer base of 7 (as for H3G Italy) is a failure?
264: 213: 2233: 2152: 2361: 2247: 2145:
Mobile Broadcast Business Models, Progress of Country-specific Implementations (02/2010)
1455:
and the DVB-SH section report exactly the same words: I have put the proper template. --
2384:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1881: 1876:- I would have thought that moving to correctly capitalise an abbreviation would be an 1735: 1694: 1547: 1289: 1167: 1046:
Only one signed user has disagreed (with only one contribution to wikipedia, this one!)
850: 761: 476: 2424:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2257: 471:
About the name DVB-H+: I found it in a document from Italian Communication Authority (
2455: 2338:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071015070422/http://amuse.ftw.at/downloads/encapsulator
2073: 1285: 539: 475:), I think they found this name in somewhere technical document but I can't be sure. 988:
I think this discussion should continue, but in the mean time I am boldly moving to
194: 2079: 1877: 1858: 1763: 1717: 1679: 1539: 1431: 1335: 1171: 864: 580: 2277: 2223: 537: 333:
Is anyone familiar with the power levels of DVB vs. the old Analog broadcasts?
2391: 1995:
The correct form of the title of this article should be with capital H, DVB-H.--
1783: 216:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 2390:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2124: 1976: 1782:
I am completing this request and have no opinion on the matter at this time. —
190: 79: 2341: 2061: 2348:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070430235027/http://www.dvb-h.org/services.htm
1604:
interleaver" . This is purely ridiculus as anyway that text is referenced.
2328:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080324123709/http://europe.nokia.com/A4797549
2174:
The section "Service launches" is little more than of historic interest.
1567:
I disagree unless you also split DVB-T2 and DVB-H2 as well, even DVB-IPDC
1429: 1925: 212:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about 2067: 300: 1288:. We're not counting votes here, but attempting to gain a consensus. 1178:
that have found an agreement on separate titles, whereas there is only
434:(Satellite Services to Portable Devices) headed by someone from Alcatel 424: 184: 157: 1966: 1777: 1671: 846: 838: 619: 2351: 2331: 2037:
Please add your new topics always at the bottom of the talk page.--
829:
Purely from a stylistic point of view, the title should simply be "
362:
The TI site link, isn't it a sort of quite explicit advertisement?
2197: 1773: 1769: 1759: 1755: 1675: 1667: 842: 834: 830: 671: 667: 615: 2170:
DVB-H is an obsolete standard no longer supported by new products
2302:
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=47573&sectionid=3510208
2143:
Hi there, to improve/update this article, you may want to check
2118:(A more direct link to the DVB-H fact sheet may be more useful: 576: 382: 2312:
http://www.kpn.com/corporate/nl/pers/persber.htm?contentid=4409
1049:
Anonymous unverified users keep coming again to show their idea
295: 15: 2148: 1419:
you have decided to give a non standard-title to this article
709:
The posts above about the page moves seem to be addressed to
2487:
Low-importance Broadcast engineering and technology articles
2372:
http://www.digitag.org/WebLetters/2011/External-Nov2011.html
263: 2447: 2268:
http://www.dvb-h.org/Services/services-philippines-mytv.htm
2183: 2164: 2132: 2103: 2087: 2046: 2030: 2004: 1984: 1959: 1941: 1884: 1866: 1847: 1791: 1738: 1725: 1711: 1697: 1687: 1655: 1641: 1623: 1598: 1582: 1562: 1527: 1508: 1491: 1464: 1445: 1406: 1359: 1343: 1319: 1292: 1267: 1240: 1207: 1134: 1117: 1099: 1081: 1063: 1031: 1001: 980: 960: 942: 923: 905: 872: 853: 822: 803: 785: 767: 699: 683: 661: 646: 631: 603: 583: 565: 548: 525: 493: 479: 398: 389: 375: 366: 348: 319:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. 2208:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2064:
including Fact Sheets covering DVB-H, DVB-SH and DVB-IPDC
1702:
Good move, only that the acronym shoud be capitalized. --
473:
http://www.agcom.it/provv/c_p_DVB-H/Sintesi_c_p_DVB-H.pdf
2492:
Broadcast engineering and technology task force articles
2201: 751: 739: 2234:
http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2069424.cms
2482:
C-Class Broadcast engineering and technology articles
2362:
http://mdtvalliance.org/en/resources/publications.asp
2248:
http://www.tre.it/public/rassegna/Modulazione_ENG.pdf
1932:
But it is not a problem, for me, if they are kept. --
1670:, and moved some of the material to a new article on 1646:
And, please don't revert the article as anonymous. --
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2394:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2258:
http://www.expway.com/telechargement/1221664059.pdf
1825:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 275:
the Broadcast engineering and technology task force
1416:you have changed the page title without consensus 1971:Template:Table_Digital_video_broadcast_standards 2278:http://www.smart.com.ph/Gold/FAQs/myTV_FAQs.htm 2224:http://www.dvb.org/technology/dvb-ngh/index.xml 2074:List of cell phones with integrated DVB-H tuner 220:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2380:This message was posted before February 2018. 1108:DVB-H and DVB-SH, or DVB Mobile TV Standards. 2070:- DVB-H specifications available for download 8: 1382:1- you check with ETSI for DVB-H and DVB-SH 2467:Low-importance Telecommunications articles 2342:http://amuse.ftw.at/downloads/encapsulator 2196:I have just modified 14 external links on 1911:DVB-H and evolution to DVB-SH & DVB-H2 1823:polling is not a substitute for discussion 423:The described system is being promoted by 152: 47: 1533: 1518:and added the disputed title template. -- 1515:I have deleted the copypasted text from 1040:I wonder if we can accept the fact that 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Telecommunications 1162:Yes, there is extra-comment. There are 599:These should really be concrete dates. 575:Feel free to add a DVB-H column to the 154: 118:Template:WikiProject Telecommunications 49: 19: 879:Comment - Article title is mis-leading 1452:Oh, curious thing that the ETSI link 933:Comment posted by 195.207.101.112. -- 896:Comment posted by 195.207.101.112. -- 794:Comment posted by 195.207.101.112. -- 412:entry and came to these conclusions: 7: 206:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 2462:C-Class Telecommunications articles 849:", with redirects as appropriate. 408:I read the sources provided at the 313:by Knowledge editors, which is now 38:It is of interest to the following 2477:Low-importance television articles 14: 2352:http://www.dvb-h.org/services.htm 2200:. Please take a moment to review 705:Comment by an uninvolved observer 577:OFDM#OFDM system comparison table 2332:http://europe.nokia.com/A4797549 2053:What external links can be kept? 1534:What's the result of the voting? 596:What year are we talking about? 299: 230:Knowledge:WikiProject Television 193: 183: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 2497:WikiProject Television articles 2222:Corrected formatting/usage for 2068:ETSI Publications Download Area 614:I'll move back this article to 250:This article has been rated as 233:Template:WikiProject Television 135:This article has been rated as 1827:Knowledge's naming conventions 1666:I have renamed the article to 688:From the official DVB website 98:WikiProject Telecommunications 1: 2448:02:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC) 1942:08:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1916:DVB-H and evolution to DVB-SH 1885:11:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1867:10:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1848:08:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1815:, then sign your comment with 1792:01:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1739:12:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1726:12:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1712:10:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1698:10:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1688:09:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1656:13:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 1642:13:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 1624:01:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC) 1599:11:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 1583:11:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 1563:21:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1548:18:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1528:00:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1509:22:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 1492:04:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC) 272:This article is supported by 109:and see a list of open tasks. 2502:Old requests for peer review 2133:19:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 2104:17:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 2088:09:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 1985:19:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 1465:12:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1446:12:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1407:11:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1360:10:32, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1344:00:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC) 1320:20:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 1293:19:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 1286:Knowledge is not a democracy 1268:16:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 1241:13:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 1208:09:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 1184:DVB Terrestrial TV standards 1135:14:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 1118:11:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 1100:18:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 1082:15:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 1064:11:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 1032:01:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC) 1002:06:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC) 981:09:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 961:03:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 943:08:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 924:14:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 906:08:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 873:00:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 854:22:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 823:05:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 804:08:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 786:21:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 768:16:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 700:22:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 684:22:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 662:22:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC) 647:09:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC) 632:11:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 571:OFDM system comparison table 2472:C-Class television articles 2047:21:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 2031:17:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1662:The article is now splitted 121:Telecommunications articles 2518: 2411:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2193:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2165:19:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 1950:should go away as well. -- 1330:Why not split the article? 1188:DVB satellite TV standards 494:18:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 480:10:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 399:08:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 390:07:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 376:23:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 256:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 2005:14:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 1960:14:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1732:Knowledge:Requested_moves 618:and make a redirect from 604:04:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 584:11:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 549:16:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 526:11:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 367:17:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC) 349:14:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 271: 249: 178: 134: 67: 46: 2184:13:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 1897:Any additional comments: 756:, a recently registered 566:12:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC) 90:Telecommunication portal 2189:External links modified 2010:Modeo Shut Down In 2007 2110:There is no reason to 1192:DVB cable TV standards 953:19:55 CET 30/01/2008 758:single-purpose account 268: 209:WikiProject Television 28:This article is rated 267: 224:for the type of work. 2392:regular verification 2155:. Happy reading :-) 2139:Mobile TV Ressources 1878:uncontroversial move 889:14:55 CET 30/01/2008 610:Moving back to DVB-H 536:From some observers 2382:After February 2018 1196:DVB IP TV standards 236:television articles 218:join the discussion 214:television programs 2436:InternetArchiveBot 2387:InternetArchiveBot 1716:I don't know how. 1693:Why not "DVB-H"? 813:per Cantalamessa. 589:Non-explicit dates 269: 112:Telecommunications 103:Telecommunications 59:Telecommunications 34:content assessment 2412: 2033: 2021:comment added by 1626: 1610:comment added by 1585: 1573:comment added by 1494: 1482:comment added by 1409: 1393:comment added by 1284:Please note that 1243: 1231:comment added by 1151: 1142:comment added by 1034: 1022:comment added by 963: 945: 908: 806: 528: 512:comment added by 463: 450:comment added by 351: 339:comment added by 323: 322: 294: 293: 290: 289: 286: 285: 201:Television portal 151: 150: 147: 146: 2509: 2446: 2437: 2410: 2409: 2388: 2289: 2245: 2016: 1921:DVB-H and DVB-SH 1819: 1813: 1807: 1605: 1568: 1477: 1388: 1226: 1137: 1017: 990:DVB-H and DVB-SH 954: 932: 895: 793: 755: 728:deleted contribs 507: 445: 334: 303: 296: 238: 237: 234: 231: 228: 222:style guidelines 203: 198: 197: 187: 180: 179: 174: 171: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2452: 2451: 2440: 2435: 2403: 2396:have permission 2386: 2283: 2239: 2206:this simple FaQ 2191: 2172: 2141: 2062:DVB Fact Sheets 2055: 2012: 1993: 1946:Recently added 1893: 1817: 1811: 1805: 1799: 1753: 1664: 1536: 1332: 1024:218.208.192.176 713: 612: 591: 573: 534: 504: 418:DVB-H in S-Band 406: 360: 331: 235: 232: 229: 226: 225: 199: 192: 172: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2515: 2513: 2505: 2504: 2499: 2494: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2474: 2469: 2464: 2454: 2453: 2430: 2429: 2422: 2375: 2374: 2366:Added archive 2364: 2356:Added archive 2354: 2346:Added archive 2344: 2336:Added archive 2334: 2326:Added archive 2324: 2316:Added archive 2314: 2306:Added archive 2304: 2296:Added archive 2294: 2280: 2272:Added archive 2270: 2262:Added archive 2260: 2252:Added archive 2250: 2236: 2228:Added archive 2226: 2220: 2212:Added archive 2190: 2187: 2171: 2168: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2122: 2116: 2107: 2106: 2077: 2076: 2071: 2065: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2011: 2008: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1974: 1962: 1944: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1913: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1870: 1869: 1851: 1850: 1832: 1831: 1806:*'''Support''' 1798: 1795: 1752: 1751:Requested move 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1644: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1601: 1575:62.149.140.185 1565: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1512: 1511: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1449: 1448: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1387: 1385: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1363: 1362: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1233:219.95.213.202 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1144:218.208.199.97 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1044: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 986: 985: 984: 983: 965: 964: 929: 928: 927: 926: 891: 890: 881: 880: 876: 875: 857: 856: 826: 825: 789: 788: 707: 706: 650: 649: 611: 608: 590: 587: 572: 569: 533: 530: 503: 502:Phone pictures 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 483: 482: 469: 442: 441: 438: 435: 428: 421: 405: 402: 359: 356: 354: 330: 327: 325: 321: 320: 304: 292: 291: 288: 287: 284: 283: 280:Low-importance 270: 260: 259: 252:Low-importance 248: 242: 241: 239: 205: 204: 188: 176: 175: 173:Low‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2514: 2503: 2500: 2498: 2495: 2493: 2490: 2488: 2485: 2483: 2480: 2478: 2475: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2465: 2463: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2450: 2449: 2444: 2439: 2438: 2427: 2423: 2420: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2407: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2383: 2378: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2293: 2287: 2281: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2249: 2243: 2237: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2225: 2221: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2194: 2188: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2169: 2167: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2023:70.156.16.211 2020: 2009: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1991:Move to DVB-H 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1824: 1816: 1812:*'''Oppose''' 1810: 1804: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1750: 1740: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1602: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1587: 1586: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1484:219.93.152.11 1481: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1426: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1329: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 982: 978: 974: 969: 968: 967: 966: 962: 959:was added at 958: 952: 948: 947: 946: 944: 940: 936: 925: 921: 917: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 907: 903: 899: 888: 883: 882: 878: 877: 874: 870: 866: 862: 859: 858: 855: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 827: 824: 820: 816: 812: 809: 808: 807: 805: 801: 797: 787: 783: 779: 775: 772: 771: 770: 769: 766: 763: 759: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 726: 723: 720: 717: 712: 704: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 689: 686: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 664: 663: 659: 655: 648: 644: 640: 636: 635: 634: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 609: 607: 605: 602: 597: 594: 588: 586: 585: 582: 578: 570: 568: 567: 563: 559: 554: 551: 550: 547: 542: 540: 538: 532:DVB-H failure 531: 529: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 501: 495: 492: 487: 486: 485: 484: 481: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 461: 457: 453: 449: 439: 436: 433: 429: 426: 422: 419: 415: 414: 413: 411: 403: 401: 400: 397: 392: 391: 388: 384: 378: 377: 374: 369: 368: 365: 357: 355: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 329:Power Levels? 328: 326: 318: 317: 312: 308: 305: 302: 298: 297: 281: 278:(assessed as 277: 276: 266: 262: 261: 257: 253: 247: 244: 243: 240: 223: 219: 215: 211: 210: 202: 196: 191: 189: 186: 182: 181: 177: 170: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2434: 2431: 2406:source check 2385: 2379: 2376: 2195: 2192: 2173: 2142: 2111: 2096:Cantalamessa 2078: 2056: 2039:Cantalamessa 2013: 1997:Cantalamessa 1994: 1952:Cantalamessa 1934:Cantalamessa 1896: 1873: 1854: 1840:Cantalamessa 1835: 1820: 1814: 1808: 1802: 1767: 1764:User:Mange01 1754: 1704:Cantalamessa 1676:Dvb-h#DVB-SH 1665: 1648:Cantalamessa 1634:Cantalamessa 1591:Cantalamessa 1555:Cantalamessa 1537: 1520:Cantalamessa 1501:Cantalamessa 1474: 1457:Cantalamessa 1438:Cantalamessa 1379: 1352:Cantalamessa 1333: 1312:Cantalamessa 1260:Cantalamessa 1200:Cantalamessa 1176:Cantalamessa 1106: 1092:Cantalamessa 1070: 1056:Cantalamessa 1015: 987: 973:Cantalamessa 935:Cantalamessa 930: 916:Cantalamessa 898:Cantalamessa 892: 860: 833:". Even if 810: 796:Cantalamessa 790: 778:Cantalamessa 748: 742: 736: 730: 724: 718: 708: 692:Cantalamessa 687: 676:Cantalamessa 665: 654:Cantalamessa 651: 639:Cantalamessa 624:Cantalamessa 613: 606:GreenAsJade 598: 595: 592: 574: 555: 552: 546:Cantalamessa 535: 514:Eagle-slayor 505: 468:suggestions. 443: 417: 409: 407: 396:Cantalamessa 393: 379: 373:Cantalamessa 370: 364:Cantalamessa 361: 353: 341:138.162.0.41 332: 324: 314: 306: 273: 251: 207: 169:Broadcasting 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 2157:Mentalmoses 2017:—Preceding 1606:—Preceding 1569:—Preceding 1553:I agree. -- 1478:—Preceding 1389:—Preceding 1227:—Preceding 1138:—Preceding 1018:—Preceding 955:—Preceding 951:andytv_2009 601:GreenAsJade 544:article? -- 508:—Preceding 491:24.80.38.70 452:24.80.38.70 446:—Preceding 335:—Preceding 311:peer review 309:received a 2456:Categories 2443:Report bug 1891:Discussion 1198:, etc.? -- 1164:MilesAgain 994:MilesAgain 815:MilesAgain 746:block user 740:filter log 666:BTW, even 227:Television 164:Television 2426:this tool 2419:this tool 2286:dead link 2242:dead link 2153:Mobile TV 1882:Oli Filth 1736:Oli Filth 1695:Oli Filth 1290:Oli Filth 1168:Oli Filth 851:Oli Filth 762:Athaenara 752:block log 477:Armando82 2432:Cheers.— 2019:unsigned 1948:DVB-(S)H 1926:DVB-H/SH 1821:. Since 1730:List on 1620:contribs 1612:Steppu75 1608:unsigned 1571:unsigned 1480:unsigned 1403:contribs 1395:Steppu75 1391:unsigned 1229:unsigned 1180:steppu75 1140:unsigned 1127:steppu75 1074:steppu75 1020:unsigned 722:contribs 711:Steppu75 522:contribs 510:unsigned 460:contribs 448:unsigned 337:unsigned 316:archived 2290:tag to 2246:tag to 2202:my edit 2080:Mange01 1874:Support 1859:Mange01 1855:Support 1836:Support 1762:— From 1718:Mange01 1680:Mange01 1540:Mange01 1336:Mange01 1172:Mange01 1110:Eoghan1 957:comment 887:Eoghan1 865:Mange01 637:Done.-- 581:Mange01 432:DVB-SSP 425:Alcatel 387:Nolaviz 254:on the 139:on the 30:C-class 2282:Added 2238:Added 2176:Reslfj 1967:DVB-SH 1797:Survey 1784:JPG-GR 1780:, etc. 1778:DVB-SH 1672:DVB-SH 1174:, and 847:DVB-SH 845:" or " 839:DVB-SH 760:. — 620:DVB-SH 558:Reslfj 410:DVB-H+ 404:DVB-H+ 36:scale. 2198:DVB-H 2125:Nageh 1977:Nageh 1774:DVB-C 1770:DVB-T 1760:DVB-H 1756:Dvb-h 1668:Dvb-h 861:DVB-H 843:DVB-H 835:DVB-H 831:DVB-H 811:DVB-H 672:DVB-H 668:DVB-T 616:DVB-H 307:DVB-H 2180:talk 2161:talk 2151:and 2149:BMCO 2129:talk 2100:talk 2084:talk 2043:talk 2027:talk 2001:talk 1981:talk 1956:talk 1938:talk 1863:talk 1844:talk 1818:~~~~ 1788:talk 1734:... 1722:talk 1708:talk 1684:talk 1652:talk 1638:talk 1616:talk 1595:talk 1579:talk 1559:talk 1544:talk 1524:talk 1505:talk 1488:talk 1461:talk 1442:talk 1399:talk 1356:talk 1340:talk 1316:talk 1264:talk 1237:talk 1204:talk 1148:talk 1131:talk 1114:talk 1096:talk 1078:talk 1060:talk 1028:talk 998:talk 977:talk 939:talk 920:talk 902:talk 869:talk 837:and 819:talk 800:talk 782:talk 776:. -- 734:logs 716:talk 696:talk 680:talk 670:and 658:talk 643:talk 628:talk 562:talk 518:talk 456:talk 383:H264 345:talk 2400:RfC 2370:to 2360:to 2350:to 2340:to 2330:to 2320:to 2310:to 2300:to 2276:to 2266:to 2256:to 2232:to 2216:to 2115:in! 2112:not 1880:. 385:). 358:Ads 246:Low 131:Low 2458:: 2413:. 2408:}} 2404:{{ 2288:}} 2284:{{ 2244:}} 2240:{{ 2182:) 2163:) 2147:, 2131:) 2102:) 2094:-- 2086:) 2045:) 2029:) 2003:) 1983:) 1958:) 1940:) 1865:) 1857:. 1846:) 1809:or 1790:) 1776:, 1772:, 1766:, 1758:→ 1724:) 1710:) 1686:) 1654:) 1640:) 1632:-- 1622:) 1618:• 1597:) 1589:-- 1581:) 1561:) 1546:) 1526:) 1507:) 1499:-- 1490:) 1463:) 1444:) 1405:) 1401:• 1358:) 1350:-- 1342:) 1318:) 1310:-- 1266:) 1239:) 1206:) 1194:, 1190:, 1186:, 1170:, 1166:, 1150:) 1133:) 1116:) 1098:) 1080:) 1062:) 1030:) 1000:) 979:) 941:) 922:) 904:) 871:) 863:. 821:) 802:) 784:) 765:✉ 698:) 682:) 660:) 645:) 630:) 579:. 564:) 524:) 520:• 462:) 458:• 347:) 282:). 167:: 2445:) 2441:( 2428:. 2421:. 2178:( 2159:( 2127:( 2121:) 2098:( 2082:( 2041:( 2025:( 1999:( 1979:( 1954:( 1936:( 1861:( 1842:( 1829:. 1786:( 1720:( 1706:( 1682:( 1650:( 1636:( 1614:( 1593:( 1577:( 1557:( 1542:( 1522:( 1503:( 1486:( 1459:( 1440:( 1397:( 1354:( 1338:( 1314:( 1262:( 1235:( 1202:( 1146:( 1129:( 1112:( 1094:( 1076:( 1058:( 1026:( 996:( 975:( 937:( 918:( 900:( 867:( 817:( 798:( 780:( 754:) 749:· 743:· 737:· 731:· 725:· 719:· 714:( 694:( 678:( 656:( 641:( 626:( 560:( 516:( 454:( 420:. 343:( 258:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Telecommunications
WikiProject icon
Telecommunication portal
WikiProject Telecommunications
Telecommunications
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Television
Broadcasting
WikiProject icon
icon
Television portal
WikiProject Television
television programs
join the discussion
style guidelines
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
the Broadcast engineering and technology task force
Low-importance

peer review
archived

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑