Knowledge

Talk:Doctor of Psychology

Source đź“ť

998:, this massive investment of training-time has been officially recognized by the APA and so moved it (that takes a lot) that it released a statement (look it up on apa.org) that the postdoc-requirement is obsolete, leading to the closure of many such training programs. Sadly, most states still require the postdoc for licensure, forcing the PhD or PsyD graduate to apply, in spite of the APA's benevolent conclusion, to many postdoctoral fellowship programs in the hope that s/he can finally get licensed. The competition is fierce now that there are fewer sites that are willing to offer postdoctoral supervision. In the end, our training (PhDs and PsyDs) from program-entry to licensure takes longer than that of most neurosurgeons, with none of the financial rewards. Finally, the archaic and partisan denigration of one degree or another harms our profession. It may satisfy some old-school adherents, but it does nothing to further our professional interests as well as our basic need to pay our astronomic academic debts and engage in the pedestrian activity of putting bread on our tables. As is, our profession is fighting for its life in the managed-care arena: It is far cheaper to employ midlevel psychotherapists (i.e., those with terminal master's degrees), so that is what managed-care by and large does. The golden era of psychologist as undisputed psychotherapist has been terminated by the money-vs.-health- conscious health conglomerates. MDs and DOs (both holders of prof. degrees, granted), have for the most part realized that their bickering about the merits of their respective training undermines their respective professions. And would it be so that clinical psychology had the "aura" and financial kickbacks of medicine. We've got miles to go before we blissfully sleep as a profession (while not @ work, of course): Our profession is evolving. We, I humbly submit, have much better things to do than putting "the other" path to the clinical doctorate down to the ground. I do not have the ref., but all of us remember the peer-reviewed article that demonstrated that Ph.D. grads in clinical psychology have a modal publications-number of zero. We all know that the mode, while a legit statistical "device," suffers from severe limitations. First, a minority of Ph.D. grads in clinical psychology 1063:
wouldn't argue the necessity for medicine too much; if you're bleeding and it won't stop, you'd do well to get yourself to a medical doctor, am I right?) Anyway, I left that part in but re-worded it it to bring it to more of a neutral state. Took out "highest standards" too and re-worked the sentence just a bit; currently American psychologists (and this is about the Doctor of Psychology degree, a US degree) are generally required to have either Ph.D's or Psy.D.s, they're trained to be supervisors, trained to take a leadership position, and trained to work collaboratively with first professionals in other areas of healthcare. It seemed reasonable enough for me since this last paragraph seems to reference BOTH of the two highest clinical psychology degrees in the US while emphasizing the Doctor of Psychology degree, which after all is the topic of the article. I disagree that the whole article needs to be re-written, speaking at least from an American perspective about this American degree; you should have seen it a few months ago, as I guess we can all gather by reading previous posts. On the other hand, there's always room for improvement I suppose. The "Clinical Psychologist" article seems to have references for the major areas of theoretical orientation... could those be repeated here I wonder? --
1350:(new user name but I'm the editor in the discussion above) I called the USNEI office at Dept of education today and spoke with two people about this list. They couldn't tell me who placed PsyD in that category but will get back to me, I'm told. I would suggest, based on the words of the USNEI webpage, that the EdD page should not be making the claim for equivalence. I know little about the EdD degree, though, so I hesitate to edit that page. But I would support someone removing that claim. Perhaps the argument should be made to remove any and all claims of degree equivalence in Knowledge articles. Trying to make claims about comparison of degrees requires an agreed upon criteria which may be impossible. (For example: Is a Dutch doctorate equivalent to an American online PhD? Certainly not. Is a D.B.A. equivalent to a D.P.H.? Who knows? How would you evaluate this claim?) So, yes, based on this problem with equivalence and on what the USNEI say about their ratings on their website, I would suggest that the claims on the EdD page should be deleted. 990:
the Psy.D. student trains many more hours in clinical practice, while the Ph.D. student trains many more hours in research and related academic subjects. If you are not scrambling to emerge from foreclosure and other financial woes many of us have been rewarded with as a result of our years of poverty-level living, you are more than welcome by all of us (I am sure) to study this in a rigorously quantitative manner. You want a reference? Make it! My family is hungry and I am broke. So far, that's my financial reward for breaking my back to acquire my degree.
1003:
cliched-but-so-true expression, do not yet all get along, if just begrudgingly. In the end, after all the tomatoes and eggs have been flung, nobody outside our profession cares about our guild issues. If they notice them, they find us laughable and head (if necessary) to the nearest LPC/LCPC/LCSW/LICSW/LMFT for some therapy. We're undermining the future of our profession, and I beg us all to please stop! We're committing mass suicide.
641: 624: 586: 470: 250: 558: 449: 222: 373: 348: 427: 326: 826: 191: 359: 236: 480: 885:"An individual who earns a doctorate in clinical psychology, educational psychology or counseling psychology from an American Psychological Association (APA) accredited program may become licensed to diagnose and treat mental disorders, conduct psychological testing and complete psychological evaluations, and provide psychotherapy and psychopharmacology. 260: 1287:
I am the editor who reverted. I reverted because a large claim needs some discussion and it is best to revert to current status and discuss before making any changes. I would agree with removing the claim that the degree is the equivalent of any other doctorate. It would be hard to prove that any two
1212:
This is not true. Your one source for this claim is USNEI, but they state in their information page that the purpose includes, "To honor the diversity and autonomy of the U.S. education system, and the spirit and letter of international educational agreements to which the United States is a party, by
881:
According to the APA 46 of the 50 states in the U.S. do not require APA accreditation for licensure. Those that do have this requirement, state that equivalency to an APA accredited program established by the applicant is sufficient to secure licensure. In fact the APA does not determine whether or
706:
The revisions I completed on 19April 2011 (see unsigned note above) seem to have stood the test of almost a year. Therefore I propose that a lot of the debate material here (which doesn't relate to the current page) be cleaned up. Many of the debates below are not germane to the current condition of
1062:
I agree to some extent and changed the quotes you added. "Such an argument holds little water" is out. As evidenced by our discussion here though, it does spark "debate" which replaced those words. My logic here is that it's commonly accepted that medicine is important to society... (I for one
989:
UnholyGhost: Although the licensure bar for clinical training is identical for both Ph.D. and Psy.D. graduates, it by-definition provides guidelines as to the minimal amount of training the APA deems acceptable. Review of Psy.D. coursework, as outlined in various school-brochures, will reveal that
1165:
Making the change without discussing it here is unacceptable. This is a contested source, it is in current discussions between the US Department of Education and the APA. The American Psychological Association states that the PhD and the PsyD are both terminal doctoral degrees. Finding one source
951:
The 2 sentences you've highlighted are also vaguely contradictory. The first says relative emphasis, whereas the second is about absolute emphasis. Coming from a non-US perspective, I'm only familiar with that. There, the clinical component is the same regardless of MA/MSc & clinical diploma,
938:
My issue is with the implication that the PsyD has a stronger clinical background that a PhD. Further, it is stated, albeit not exactly directly, that there is a difference in clinical competency between the two degrees. It all smacks of weasely statements that require citations to support.
1288:
PhDs are equivalent, and this sort of claim is wrong and cannot be supported. I am working on cleaning up the whole article right now. It is a biased mess, with a lot of unsupported claims and loaded adjectives. I'll try cleaning it up and then step aside and see what you think. How's that?
762:
What is the status of PsyD sorts of degrees outside the US? There is a challenge that this article is written from a US perspective, but if the PsyD does not exist outside the US (does it?) that challenge would not make sense. (That is, if it is a US issue, then it perforce must have a US
1045:
Expressions like "But such an argument holds little water", "long since proven themselves indispensable to humankind.", "Trained as clinicians and leaders in the field, Psy.D.'s provide informed, collaborative care at the highest standards" aren't exactly neutral, enyclopedic expressions.
1002:
go on to academic careers such as university/college tenure-track ones, and they publish so as not to perish. Second, we also know that an even smaller minority of Psy.D. grads (I'm one of them) publishes in peer-reviewed journals just like Ph.D. grads do. It is sad that we, to borrow a
965:
I concur. There is more contradiction when you contrast the clinical ability of PsyDs vs PhDs regarding licensing. The bar for obtaining a license is the same, so, one could assume (in the absense of any other information) that the PsyD and PhD would be equally capible clinicians.
838: 1272:, so I think the person who restored the old material made an error in restoring unverifiable material!!! If a better source cannot be found for the paragraph that was restored I will remove it again as it is NOT VERIFIED and does not meet wikipedia standards. 777:
In other countries there are comparable degrees with similar names. In the U.K., for example, the degree is often abbreviated as DClinPsych, DClinPsy or ClinPsyD. For example, here is the information on the DClinPsy degree from Kings College London:
670:
The background section on this page is filled with glaring inaccuracies. It shows signs of clear bias towards Psy.D and misleading claims against Ph.D training with no empirical support. Suggest that this be rewritten using data rather than opinion.
1188:
Both being "terminal" doesn't mean equal. The Master of Fine Arts is a terminal degree but is not a doctorate. I don't have an agenda other than improving wikipedia. By suggesting that I have an agenda I feel you are not assuming good faith (see
675:
Major clean up on 19 April 2011 - I have cleaned up and rewritten this whole page. I have added sources and removed promotional claims and comparisons to most other degrees. Please review the work that I have done and suggest additional changes.
1139:
Now that I have added a paragraph explaining that the Psy.D. is not equivalent to certain other doctorates (along with a verifiable citation), I have removed the contradictory and unverifiable paragraph saying that these degrees are all
1113:
I have also now added a paragraph that explicitly states that the Psy.D. is NOT the equivalent of the MD, JD, EdD, or PhD, as designated by the US Department of Education (which I take to be the highest authority on Education in the
1166:
that states otherwise is not a conclusive reason to make a drastic change to this article. If you have an agenda about the PsyD versus PhD degrees you should discuss it here and seek input before a radical revision to the article.
153: 1368:). This isn't a reason to make this claim here, as I would argue that all of these arguments about degree equivalence need to go away, but it is worth mentioning that the APA is one of the groups making the claim. 1330:
page and give the same reasons over there. Otherwise, it would seem that people are only trusting sources when they confirm a particular belief and casting doubt upon the source when it contradicts their belief :)
1213:
serving exclusively as an information center and not as a policymaking body on credential recognition, admissions, or mobility issues, which by U.S. law and practice are reserved to other competent authorities."
952:
PsyD, or PhD & clinical diploma. Slightly more contentiously, one could argue that if the PhD research is on a clinical topic (which it need not be), then that may make for a better clinician. --
1093:
To say that Psy.D. recipients were not included among respondents of a survey does not endorse the Psy.D. as equivalent to the degree held by those people who are respondents of the survey.
1089:
The most common research doctorate degree is the Ph.D. Doctorate recipients of professional doctorate degrees such as M.D., D.D.S., J.D., D.Pharm., and Psy.D are not included in the survey.
994:, both Psy.D. and Ph.D. graduates take an average of seven to ten years to complete their degrees (a ref. exists; by all means, please find it if you're not trying to find a postdoc). 882:
not an applicant is licensed by the state in which he or she works. Therefore, I propose that the following sentences in the introduction be edited to reflect these facts facts:
1736: 1731: 1706: 1085:
When I followed the citation that was given I was taken to a page discussing NSF's "Survey of Earned Doctorates." The Psy.D. was mentioned in this page only in this sentence:
147: 401: 737:
The way that the article is written makes it seem like the Doctor of Psychology program only confers the title of "doctor" outside the United States. Is this accurate?
1711: 1701: 1691: 1619: 1615: 1601: 1459: 1455: 1441: 648: 631: 572: 568: 1686: 306: 44: 1741: 1721: 1266:
The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. You may remove any material lacking a reliable source that directly supports it.
530: 397: 316: 1016:
A researcher is professional. One can be involved in the professional practice of psychology as a researcher. I think its clearer to use clinical here.
540: 79: 1407: 1326:
in education. If an editor here feels that the USNEI source is not appropriate for the Psy.D. page, I would suggest that they should also go edit the
858: 1696: 1681: 1726: 1716: 1561: 1364:
Part of the problem here is the APA itself. It seems to be making the claim that the PsyD is a degree equivalent to the M.D. (for example, here:
1193:). (Do you perhaps have an agenda?) Furthermore, I think it's entirely acceptable to make a change without discussing something in advance (see 691:
I have removed information on non-doctoral clinical psychology training problems around the world. These should be included in the page for . --
380: 353: 1551: 764: 748: 282: 85: 506: 813:), should these two articles be better coordinated? Or should a section be included in this article that compares it to the D.Clin.Psych.? 1082:
I added a "Failed Verification" tag to the section that claims that the Psy.D. is equivalent to the M.D., Pharm.D., and other degrees.
593: 563: 1597:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1295: 1218: 1173: 792: 677: 168: 273: 227: 135: 1224:
Oh, but National Science Foundation (which is the older citation) IS a valid source? How are they better suited than the USNEI?
493: 454: 99: 30: 104: 20: 935:
I do not contest that a PsyD may not have the research background that a PhD may have, but a source for that would be nice.
783: 1587: 888:
For non-clinical doctorates in psychology, programs are not accredited by the APA and there is no license to practice..."
810: 74: 1662: 1502: 202: 598: 129: 65: 1408:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110811131932/http://www.argosy.edu:80/colleges/american-school-professional-psychology/
1214: 1577: 125: 1618:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1458:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1562:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120125002559/http://www.du.edu/gspp/degree-programs/clinical-psychology/overview/
768: 752: 723:
According to my text book, the vail conf was in 1973, not 75...posted by adam freeman. adam.freeman@wmich.edu
190: 1653: 1529: 1493: 1399: 763:
perspective. Is there a non-US PsyD? I have never met one and I work with a lot of non-US psychologists.
175: 109: 747:
I know that the title of doctor is used for PsyD people inside the US, but don't have a reference for it.
1571: 1552:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111016040458/http://www.doh.wa.gov/hsqa/professions/psychology/licensure.htm
1411: 728: 505:
topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1637:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1625: 1477:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1465: 1299: 1177: 982: 796: 738: 681: 208: 1565: 1528:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1398:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1068: 782:
Here is the information from the University of Manchester, which abbreviates the degree as ClinPsyD:
1521: 1432: 1391: 1291: 1169: 788: 24: 1369: 1351: 1053: 708: 692: 1373: 1355: 1315: 712: 696: 161: 55: 1555: 281:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
141: 1539: 1064: 866: 850: 829:
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
502: 70: 1622:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1462:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1638: 1478: 1336: 1332: 1273: 1246: 1225: 1198: 1149: 1119: 1096: 265: 51: 1314:
that the USNEI may be a "contested" source among the editors of the Psy.D. page, but on the
1028:
There is no evidence that demonstrates that any given PsyD is any more competent than a PhD.
978: 485: 385: 1645: 1485: 920: 909: 846: 784:
http://www.phdportal.eu/students/browse/programme/19508/clinical-psychology-clinpsyd.html
1588:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141107004226/http://www.mspp.edu/admissions/apply/psyd.php
1604:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1444:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1194: 953: 1644:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1484:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1078:
US Department of Education does not classify Psy.D. as equivalent to M.D., Ph.D., etc.
1675: 1365: 1340: 1277: 1250: 1229: 1202: 1190: 1153: 1123: 1100: 1032: 967: 942: 862: 842: 1049:
I would suggest most of this article is in dire need of being completely rewritten.
358: 235: 1545: 1215:
http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/edlite-disclaim.html
640: 623: 1578:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141107001416/http://www.forest.edu/ad-req-psyd.aspx
1611: 1591: 1451: 1318:
page the USNEI is used as one of several sources to validate the claim that the
1270:
However, to restore material that is not verifiable fails the burden of evidence
1261: 825: 591:
This article was created or improved during the following events hosted by the
585: 557: 469: 448: 249: 221: 1667: 1507: 1377: 1359: 1344: 1303: 1281: 1254: 1233: 1206: 1181: 1157: 1127: 1104: 1072: 1056: 1035: 986: 970: 956: 945: 870: 800: 772: 756: 741: 731: 716: 700: 685: 1610:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1450:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 475: 426: 389: 325: 278: 255: 1217:
This is not a valid source to claim that the PsyD is not a full doctorate.
779: 498: 372: 347: 479: 1581: 1572:
http://www.argosy.edu/colleges/american-school-professional-psychology/
1412:
http://www.argosy.edu/colleges/american-school-professional-psychology/
1268:
I was fully within policy to remove material that failed verification.
894:
Edit: I removed the erroneous and fictitious entries myself 6/11/2013.
393: 1566:
http://www.du.edu/gspp/degree-programs/clinical-psychology/overview/
809:
There exists and article on the British version of this degree (the
1240:
Rather than reverting to the original version (which is flawed and
1327: 1323: 1319: 1556:
http://www.doh.wa.gov/hsqa/Professions/psychology/licensure.htm
184: 15: 1417:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
639: 622: 434:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
425: 333:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
324: 1532:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1402:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
396:
on Knowledge. Please visit the project page to join the
1525: 1395: 921:
http://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2004/04/accreditation.aspx
910:
http://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2004/04/accreditation.aspx
160: 820:
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
601:
regarding their contributions before making changes.
497:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 384:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 277:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1614:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1454:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 597:project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please 1366:http://www.apa.org/education/grad/faqs.aspx?item=6 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1546:http://www.asppb.org/HandbookPublic/before.aspx 891:Thanks. nightwatchdog@hotmail.com June 3, 2013 1600:This message was posted before February 2018. 1440:This message was posted before February 2018. 1244:) why didn't anyone improve the old version?!! 1592:http://www.mspp.edu/admissions/apply/psyd.php 174: 8: 1737:WikiProject Women in Red meetup 193 articles 1732:WikiProject Women in Red meetup 189 articles 727:Concur. This article would be better moved. 1707:Higher education articles needing attention 188: 1390:I have just modified one external link on 552: 443: 342: 216: 1520:I have just modified 5 external links on 859:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment 780:http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/virtual/?path=65 1015:changed professional to clinical -: --> 902: 857:Above undated message substituted from 554: 445: 344: 218: 1582:http://www.forest.edu/ad-req-psyd.aspx 410:Knowledge:WikiProject Higher education 1712:WikiProject Higher education articles 1702:Start-Class Higher education articles 1692:Psychology articles needing attention 1429:to let others know (documentation at 413:Template:WikiProject Higher education 7: 491:This article is within the scope of 378:This article is within the scope of 271:This article is within the scope of 1687:High-importance psychology articles 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1742:All WikiProject Women in Red pages 1722:High-importance education articles 1022:Its a direct quote fro the source. 1011:Ok, made some edits, this is why: 877:Please Remove False APA statements 834: 830: 607:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Red 14: 1524:. Please take a moment to review 1394:. Please take a moment to review 610:Template:WikiProject Women in Red 837:. Further details are available 824: 584: 556: 478: 468: 447: 371: 357: 346: 291:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology 258: 248: 234: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1697:WikiProject Psychology articles 1682:Start-Class psychology articles 1570:Corrected formatting/usage for 535:This article has been rated as 515:Knowledge:WikiProject Education 311:This article has been rated as 294:Template:WikiProject Psychology 1727:WikiProject Education articles 1717:Start-Class education articles 1668:23:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC) 518:Template:WikiProject Education 1: 1508:14:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC) 1036:18:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 971:17:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 957:21:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 946:17:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 509:and see a list of open tasks. 285:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 987:13:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 871:19:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC) 801:22:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 742:14:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC) 649:VisibleWikiWomen edit-a-thon 381:WikiProject Higher education 1021:change to explicitly -: --> 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1758: 1631:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1517:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1471:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1387:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1378:19:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1360:19:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1345:18:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1322:degree is equivalent to a 1304:16:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1282:15:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1255:15:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1234:15:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1207:15:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1182:07:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 1158:19:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC) 1128:19:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC) 1105:19:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC) 686:17:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 541:project's importance scale 317:project's importance scale 1073:03:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC) 1057:17:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC) 773:21:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 757:21:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 717:06:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 701:06:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 647: 630: 579: 534: 463: 433: 416:Higher education articles 366: 332: 310: 243: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1027:remove competency -: --> 732:20:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 400:, and see the project's 1513:External links modified 1383:External links modified 632:Black women edit-a-thon 573:VisibleWikiWomen (2021) 644: 627: 430: 329: 274:WikiProject Psychology 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 841:. Student editor(s): 643: 626: 613:Women in Red articles 494:WikiProject Education 429: 328: 100:Neutral point of view 1612:regular verification 1522:Doctor of Psychology 1452:regular verification 1392:Doctor of Psychology 1310:Sounds like a plan. 1007:rm weasel statements 105:No original research 25:Doctor of Psychology 1602:After February 2018 1442:After February 2018 1421:parameter below to 1316:Doctor of Education 1054:Felix the Cassowary 297:psychology articles 1656:InternetArchiveBot 1607:InternetArchiveBot 1496:InternetArchiveBot 1447:InternetArchiveBot 839:on the course page 645: 628: 569:Black women (2021) 521:education articles 431: 404:for useful advice. 330: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1632: 1472: 1333:confirmation bias 1294:comment added by 1172:comment added by 791:comment added by 663: 662: 659: 658: 655: 654: 599:assume good faith 551: 550: 547: 546: 503:education-related 442: 441: 438: 437: 402:article guideline 341: 340: 337: 336: 266:Psychology portal 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1749: 1666: 1657: 1630: 1629: 1608: 1543: 1506: 1497: 1470: 1469: 1448: 1436: 1306: 1242:fails validation 1184: 923: 918: 912: 907: 873: 836: 835:10 December 2019 832: 828: 803: 634:in February 2021 615: 614: 611: 608: 605: 588: 581: 580: 575: 560: 553: 523: 522: 519: 516: 513: 488: 486:Education portal 483: 482: 472: 465: 464: 459: 451: 444: 418: 417: 414: 411: 408: 407:Higher education 386:higher education 375: 368: 367: 362: 361: 360: 354:Higher education 350: 343: 299: 298: 295: 292: 289: 268: 263: 262: 261: 252: 245: 244: 239: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1672: 1671: 1660: 1655: 1623: 1616:have permission 1606: 1537: 1530:this simple FaQ 1515: 1500: 1495: 1463: 1456:have permission 1446: 1430: 1400:this simple FaQ 1385: 1289: 1167: 1080: 1043: 1009: 933: 931:PhD versus PsyD 928: 927: 926: 919: 915: 908: 904: 879: 856: 822: 786: 765:169.234.242.185 749:169.234.242.185 668: 612: 609: 606: 603: 602: 566: 537:High-importance 520: 517: 514: 511: 510: 484: 477: 458:High‑importance 457: 415: 412: 409: 406: 405: 356: 313:High-importance 296: 293: 290: 287: 286: 264: 259: 257: 233: 231:High‑importance 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1755: 1753: 1745: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1729: 1724: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1689: 1684: 1674: 1673: 1650: 1649: 1642: 1595: 1594: 1586:Added archive 1584: 1576:Added archive 1574: 1568: 1560:Added archive 1558: 1550:Added archive 1548: 1514: 1511: 1490: 1489: 1482: 1415: 1414: 1406:Added archive 1384: 1381: 1348: 1347: 1285: 1284: 1237: 1236: 1210: 1209: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1116: 1115: 1109: 1091: 1090: 1079: 1076: 1061: 1042: 1039: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1017: 1008: 1005: 976: 975: 974: 973: 960: 959: 932: 929: 925: 924: 913: 901: 900: 896: 878: 875: 831:23 August 2019 821: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 760: 759: 736: 726: 722: 720: 707:the webpage.-- 705: 690: 674: 667: 664: 661: 660: 657: 656: 653: 652: 646: 636: 635: 629: 619: 618: 616: 589: 577: 576: 561: 549: 548: 545: 544: 533: 527: 526: 524: 507:the discussion 490: 489: 473: 461: 460: 452: 440: 439: 436: 435: 432: 422: 421: 419: 376: 364: 363: 351: 339: 338: 335: 334: 331: 321: 320: 309: 303: 302: 300: 283:the discussion 270: 269: 253: 241: 240: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1754: 1743: 1740: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1730: 1728: 1725: 1723: 1720: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1677: 1670: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1658: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1627: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1573: 1569: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1547: 1541: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1518: 1512: 1510: 1509: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1487: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1467: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1443: 1438: 1434: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1243: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1059: 1058: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1026: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1006: 1004: 1001: 997: 993: 988: 984: 980: 972: 969: 964: 963: 962: 961: 958: 955: 950: 949: 948: 947: 944: 940: 936: 930: 922: 917: 914: 911: 906: 903: 899: 895: 892: 889: 886: 883: 876: 874: 872: 868: 864: 860: 854: 852: 851:Melissacherry 848: 844: 840: 827: 819: 812: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 802: 798: 794: 790: 785: 781: 775: 774: 770: 766: 758: 754: 750: 746: 745: 744: 743: 740: 739:DenimForce2.0 734: 733: 730: 724: 719: 718: 714: 710: 703: 702: 698: 694: 688: 687: 683: 679: 672: 665: 651:in March 2021 650: 642: 638: 637: 633: 625: 621: 620: 617: 600: 596: 595: 590: 587: 583: 582: 578: 574: 570: 565: 562: 559: 555: 542: 538: 532: 529: 528: 525: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 487: 481: 476: 474: 471: 467: 466: 462: 456: 453: 450: 446: 428: 424: 423: 420: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 377: 374: 370: 369: 365: 355: 352: 349: 345: 327: 323: 322: 318: 314: 308: 305: 304: 301: 284: 280: 276: 275: 267: 256: 254: 251: 247: 246: 242: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1654: 1651: 1626:source check 1605: 1599: 1596: 1519: 1516: 1494: 1491: 1466:source check 1445: 1439: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1416: 1389: 1386: 1363: 1349: 1311: 1286: 1269: 1265: 1241: 1239: 1238: 1211: 1164: 1132: 1108: 1095: 1092: 1084: 1081: 1060: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1031: 1010: 999: 995: 991: 977: 941: 937: 934: 916: 905: 897: 893: 890: 887: 884: 880: 855: 823: 776: 761: 735: 725: 721: 704: 689: 673: 669: 604:Women in Red 594:Women in Red 592: 564:Women in Red 536: 492: 390:universities 379: 312: 272: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1433:Sourcecheck 1312:Please note 1296:24.12.12.43 1290:—Preceding 1219:24.12.12.43 1174:24.12.12.43 1168:—Preceding 1140:equivalent. 979:UnholyGhost 793:24.12.12.43 787:—Preceding 678:24.12.12.43 199:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 1676:Categories 1663:Report bug 1503:Report bug 996:Regardless 992:Regardless 898:References 847:Galaxy8900 811:DClinPsych 398:discussion 288:Psychology 279:Psychology 228:Psychology 1646:this tool 1639:this tool 1540:dead link 1486:this tool 1479:this tool 1370:Dcroberts 1352:Dcroberts 954:Limegreen 709:Dcroberts 693:Dcroberts 512:Education 499:education 455:Education 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1652:Cheers.— 1492:Cheers.— 1292:unsigned 1170:unsigned 1033:Roodog2k 968:Roodog2k 943:Roodog2k 863:PrimeBOT 843:Valegria 789:unsigned 666:Untitled 394:colleges 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1544:tag to 1526:my edit 1419:checked 1396:my edit 1195:WP:BOLD 539:on the 315:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1536:Added 1427:failed 1191:WP:AGF 1065:Amy332 729:V. Joe 392:, and 205:scale. 126:Google 1328:Ed.D. 1324:Ph.D. 1320:Ed.D. 1260:From 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1423:true 1374:talk 1356:talk 1341:talk 1300:talk 1278:talk 1262:WP:V 1251:talk 1230:talk 1203:talk 1178:talk 1154:talk 1124:talk 1114:US). 1101:talk 1069:talk 1041:NPOV 983:talk 867:talk 833:and 797:talk 769:talk 753:talk 713:talk 697:talk 682:talk 531:High 501:and 307:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1620:RfC 1590:to 1580:to 1564:to 1554:to 1460:RfC 1437:). 1425:or 1410:to 1337:Ehb 1335:). 1274:Ehb 1247:Ehb 1226:Ehb 1199:Ehb 1197:). 1150:Ehb 1120:Ehb 1097:Ehb 861:by 176:TWL 1678:: 1633:. 1628:}} 1624:{{ 1542:}} 1538:{{ 1473:. 1468:}} 1464:{{ 1435:}} 1431:{{ 1376:) 1358:) 1343:) 1302:) 1280:) 1264:: 1253:) 1232:) 1205:) 1180:) 1156:) 1126:) 1103:) 1071:) 1000:do 985:) 869:) 853:. 849:, 845:, 799:) 771:) 755:) 715:) 699:) 684:) 571:/ 567:: 388:, 156:) 54:; 1665:) 1661:( 1648:. 1641:. 1505:) 1501:( 1488:. 1481:. 1372:( 1354:( 1339:( 1331:( 1298:( 1276:( 1249:( 1228:( 1201:( 1176:( 1152:( 1122:( 1099:( 1067:( 1052:— 981:( 865:( 795:( 767:( 751:( 711:( 695:( 680:( 543:. 319:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Doctor of Psychology
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Psychology
WikiProject icon
Psychology portal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑