Talk:Deadpool/Archive 2

1134:

that get their fictional biographies, Cartoon, TV, Book, Game & many other fictional characters, every single fictional character in history gets his/her own biography, from Sonic the Hedgehog to Jesus Christ, all fictional characters who are in Knowledge have a bio, so in your logic we have to go through every fictional character in history & delete everything in their bio section? & 3) yes, he is, but, I have this theory that every form of fiction is really an alternate reality, eg, in some reality Osborn is taken over the world, in another everyone is yellow, & another Chandler & Monica did adopt twins, while this is just a theory & means nothing, is there any evidence saying that it isn't true, but let me ask you this, if someone goes to wiki for information about a characters past, or to catch up with what's happened lately, & they find nothing, won that ruin wiki's reputation with people?--

731:

also in question. What exactly was so crappy with the Deadpool page besides the need for some small edits here and there? It does seem from the Doctor Strange Talk Page, you seem a bit angry. While I am a Deadpool fan, I do not want to take a stance on who is right. Please, Deadpoolfan77, do not proceed to just post random stuff on talk pages, and Cameron, please control yourself because you seem a bit aggressive. As for the current set up for his history, while it does not have the detail of the old one, it better fits Knowledge because I have to admit that a detailed history of Deadpool better fits Marvel Wikia or similar sites. However, there is something that I have a problem with. Why did you decide to basically cut down an entire history of a comic book character but leave others intact? But whatever, just improve on both of your conducts and that will be the end of that.

1248:

has gone too far. Your so called "editing" is nothing more than the eradication of crucial data most of us users appreciate. True to earlier statements that this article was lengthy and did include some insignificant material, this is far from "chewing the fat." If anything, it seems you are skinning it bare. Not only that, but you apparently decided to follow such actions without any actual consent. Your motives may have been just at the beginning, but now, it seems that this has gotten way out of hand. If anything, it seems as though this is nothing more than vandalism with an excuse. If you really wish to maintain this article, why not return the information from a couple weeks past and then take away the bits and pieces from that article instead of allowing these corrupted protocols to continue.

1661:

those changes keep getting reverted (mostly by Dodds, who seems to have a separate view on what constitutes relevant information). It's clear that every here wants the best for the page, but while some of us are more focused on the article being as descriptive and all inclusive as possible, some of us alternatively more focused on making the page more of an sourced analysis of the character than a profile, and it's hard to achieve that middle ground between the two. I'd feel a lot better about all this if we could get the opinion of a neutral party who hasn't been a part of this whole debate, and it'd probably make things a lot easier for everyone involved since we'd have a more clear idea of what the finished product should look like. --

955:

deleted or merged - I think for comics we now have less than five and I doubt those will last much longer. The clash you seen on this types of pages is one of culture, pages with lavish plot summaries represent wikipedia as it was, not how it is now and as people notice articles and try and bring them in line with how policy *now* says an article should be written, you can expect to see more of those discussions. For example, while it's not policy yet, more and people connected with writing the comic articles are coming around to the idea that they should not a fictional bio of more than three or four paragraphs - in a couple of years, that could be the norm and the articles could be further edited to reflect that. --

900:

is shorter than what existed here before the clean-up. The point about writing Knowledge articles, is that as even as a fan of a character or series you have to check that in at the door and write according to our policies and MOS. The weakness with most comic articles (and with this one) is that a) they treat the fictional character as real and b) they rely on primary sources. For a Knowledge fiction article to progress to Good and then Featured, it has to treat the character as an object of the narrative and concentrate on their cultural impact, their reception in third party sources not simply be a lavish plot summary etc – this article does this only in a marginal way at the moment).

1180:, character pages should include sections for a fictional biography, powers and abilities, and other versions, all of which were things you deleted without consulting the larger community of editors first. So unless you want to singlehandedly rewrite Knowledge's guidelines for comics-related articles and alter the pages for Batman, Robin, Spider-Man, and all the other characters with biographies, I'd STRONGLY recommend restoring the deleted information, then trimming out the excess events that don't play a critical role to Deadpool's backstory (particularly in regards to the needlessly long section on the newest series). And if you don't, I will. -- 1176:

information, especially the fictional biography? I agree that it was a bit too lengthy and could use some revisions to condense it, but as it stands now, anyone who actually wants to learn about the character himself and not the influences has been left totally in the dark. Not to mention that a lot of relevant information's been deleted, including some in-other-media appearances and anything having to do with the character's alternate universe versions (two things which, again, almost every other major comic book character article has). Not to mention that according to the character pages section of

1266:

Yet the article which has displayed the most effect of these changes was this one. Is it because you wished to dismember information on a character who, compared to more famous fictional icons, have a smaller to moderate following and their more recent inception to the public eye, which would mean fewer people would take notice compared to more popular characters such as Spiderman or even Aquaman? Or perhaps you are truly making an this subject in the crossfire due to some cyber quarrel with another user. Either way, these extreme alterations must cease and everything should be normalized.

2423:

the information himself! Here he is talking about how they wanted the character's biography to be within wiki's guidelines, yet there have been little (sorry) no steps being made to do so. Not even a separate page has been created. So tell me, no, everyone, what you plan to do? Unless someone else is supposed to sift the all of Deadpool's appearances (both previous adventures and currents stories) to make the page acceptable (in other words, have someone clean your own mess because you don't give a damn)?

912:

that says something like "Fictional Biography of Deadpool" or "More information here." True I can understand that some of these pages can overexert the reality of some things which do or do not exist, but that doesn't mean that entire history should be deleted and replaced with something that wouldn't even pass for a 4th grade book report (not that I know of a grade school student who would write one about a fictional character mind you, but you know what I'm getting at).

412:

with that being added. And don't get me wrong, if there's an appropriate source then there's no reason for it to be excluded. But the source that was given when you added the info was not any proof one way or another. If you or any other editor would cite, for example, an interview with the fimmakers that confirms the assumption, it would be fine. But so far it's only a large number of bloggers, editors, etc. who saw the film and made their own assumption.

2485:(let's go round around) - a fictional bio that is written in publication order, which is not written as if the character is real, which treats the characters as an object of the narrative. The previous bio did none of those things and was based around 25 issues of over 300 appearances! If you can write a fictional bio that confirms to policy, nobody will be able to remove it. The sort of shit we had previously? People will scrub that on sight. -- 3058: 31: 882:

a large page long article on their biography, Scott, why? You think it's too long, (Wolverine has it's own page for his biography) you wanted to mess with everyone as a joke, you're a bully, what reason do you have? I'm going to try to find the information & repost it, but don't delete it, I may be new as an accont but I have worked as an IP user for some time & I know that they deserve more information than that on an article.--

1598:

use Caps on names & use words instead of numbers that sound like the word, & yes, The Merc with a Mouth, Deadpool is 'KK' which is why we're not deleting his page, instead, we're doing a democratic debate on weather or not he should get is Bio & Alt's back, which he should, the only reason not to makes no sense, & yeah Scott, stop calling it Crap, this is wiki, be civilized.--

1406:

far by constantly deleting material instead of working together with the rest of us to create an article that is as informative as possible and yet still following Knowledge guidelines. Since I've read every issue of every series Deadpool has ever starred in, the character has a special place in my heart, and I just want to make sure that the page achieves its maximum potential. --

232:

seems more not that you think its unsourced, so much as you dont agree with the sound. Well if you cant agree that the sound is a sh (and once again I'm not putting in about the fourth wall break because I have no proof for that) why not at least allow someone to put on the page that he opens his eyes and makes a noise, because as is, it doesnt tell the whole story of the scene.

325:

portrayed in the film, or perhaps the result of an inability to understand the english language. Please continue to discuss. The way the article is written now ("...and makes a noise.") is ridiculous. If someone reads this article it will leave them asking the question "What noise does Deadpool make?" This is not informative at all.

1397:

other editors first). Also, Deadpool's relevance has been established throughout previous citations in the article (not to mention the fact that he has has multiple books and currently two, soon three, ongoing series), whereas a plot summary is meant to be based around primary sources. If you look at the biographies on the

2364:

information on these characters now, and Cable has been like that for at least a year, with minimal updates made by some other people. It just seems a little selfish to go ahead and change a whole article but not put anything back in there so people who are interested can learn about that particular character.

3017:

About the Superman/Batman thing, it shouldn't be in AU section, but perhaps the 2000's section? I know someone said this before, but I just want to suggest it again. It is DC, and it's not really Deadpool, but it should at least be mentioned because of how much they are alike. Just my thinking on it,

2542:

You're resorting to personal attacks instead of actually trying to help? Talk about immature. I've glanced over the history of this page, and far as I can tell, you've never once ADDED anything to the page; only removed existing information. So tell me, how can you consider yourself to be superior

2458:

And yet WP:COMICS still says that characters are entitled to fictional biographies. So if you're going to shred up a page, then do nothing to fix it, then you shouldn't have messed with the damn page in the first place. We have lives too, and we don't want to spend them cleaning up YOUR mistakes. --

1842:

Cameron Scott, if you're gonna do this to Deadpool and Dpc Strange's page you need to do it to every other comic character as well. I know for a fact that Wolverine, Spiderman, and Batman have "Fictional Character Biographies", and that's just off the top of my head. I'm not saying what you are doing

1597:

Because we don't delete a page because its messed up, we only delete a page if the thing its based on isn't deserving of a page, it gets merged, or if some vandel thinks its funny to delete it, also, seriously, use real English! Yes it is a talk page, but this isn't a message board, you still need to

1265:

Not only this, but there has been a question which I've asked myself ever since this whole issue first began. Why did you choose the Deadpool article as the primary target of your so called editing? As stated before, there are so many other characters which had similar "invalid" items on their pages.

1175:

I have to ask, Cameron and Dodds, what the hell were you thinking? Why on earth would you do such a thorough removal of content, especially without consulting with anyone else first? Unless you're going to do the same for EVERY OTHER COMIC BOOK CHARACTER, why would you even consider removing so much

954:

The discussion material has been archived, you can see the link at the top - it's done every so often to stop the pages from getting too long. As for the "fictional history of..." articles, we used to have quite a few of those but over time, as wikipedia policy has been come codified, those have been

911:

That may be true, but don't articles like Batman and even Wolverine usually have a separate page which has the most of character biography and is linked to it's main page? So in a way, you could have simply cut and pasted Deadpool's information which was on here to a separate page and then set a link

754:

Universe. Unless this is going to be remade like the Ms. Marvel article (or this really is just some stupid rivalry going south and placing a fictional, yet favorable character as a victim in the middle a war of cyberbullying), then please return the article to its previous, more descriptive status.

730:

First, Deadpoolfan 77 - You do realize that the talk pages are for things concerning the article such as edits new info etc. Not for you personal opinion, especially if it is on a different talk page. I have to say that your opinions are rather....well you could have handled it better. But Cameron is

411:

of what "shh" means that it shouldn't be in the article. It means that he was, as you say, interjecting and urging silence, and therefore breaking the fourth wall. Saying that he makes a hissing sound is fine because that's a fact which isn't really open to interpretation, so I don't have any problem

231:

By that rationale then you can argue much plots or articles on wikipedia then can be a violation of wiki's term. When commenting about the plot of a movie you can use the movie as a source, which is being used as a source for the sound because its what the sound sounds like. So how is it unsorced. It

168:

is. Hear the noise however you want, but realize that this is entirely speculation, which, as stated before, is against wikipedia policy. I've gone over this with you before on your talk page, making it perfectly clear that this is not appropriate to add to an article, but you have instead decided to

2947:

Also, I don't know whether or not you should keep the DC Superman/Batman character as an actual AU Deadpool. Though it is possible that he may be the merc, you have to remember that it's still a DC publication. Even if the same writer was involved, he had the same mannerisms, and kept saying "Dea-",

2939:

A second version is the Exiles teammate turned antagonist. He first appeared as part of AOA Sabretooth's Weapon X team before being frozen within the headquarters. After being brought back by Exile's Dr. Strange, he tried to take over the HQ. However, he was stopped by the heroic Exiles team and was

2935:

There are two other Deadpool versions that have not been added. The first is the Millennial Visions imagining which has Deadpool become a hunter of mutants. He was hired by Sebastion Shaw and used his resources to exterminate most of the mutated population. The only ones remaining were about four or

1421:

If you can write a bio from secondary sources that provide critical analysis and are not simple a recap of the plot, you go for it. Where you get this idea that a plot summary should be based around primary sources is beyond me - without secondary sources to indicate importance, how do you decide on

1405:

pages, you'll see that they are entirely based around primary sources and not analyses. I honestly don't mean to sound like I'm attacking you, and I will not argue that the comments of users like Deadpoolfan and Tubesgirl were out of line, but it honestly feels like you're taking this thing WAY too

1345:

dispute resolution moderators, best of luck in look finding one. We have a dispute resolution process but since everyone of my edits has been in line with common practice and policy, while you are welcome to enter the process, it's not something that worries me. But while we are handing out threats,

1313:

I saw the comment in question, and based on that, this seems much less like a series of good faith edits and more like a personal vendetta. And seeing that award near the bottom of your user page would seem to indicate that this isn't the first time you've one out of the way and over other editors'

1069:

says that we should ignore any guideline or policy that gets in the way of writing an article that properly covers its subject matter. Accepted practice Wiki-wide appears to be to include a primary-source-sourced biography section in articles about fictional characters. If you want to change that,

881:

I return from a week long holiday & someone removes all of the fictional info on the greatest comic book character of all time, & replaces itwith a small bit about his origin, that's not fictional character Bio, that's, fictional Origin, Yes he's not real, but every other comic character has

787:

While I do miss the full history, and I do have to agree that getting rid of all of it is a mistake, I'm wishing that we can soon get a article which will honor The Merc With A Mouth's rightful place as a comic book character. As much as I want to dicuss this to further lengths, it is getting rather

472:

I don't want to get into a fight about this. But just because Reynolds has been confirmed to be playing the Green Lantern in the up and coming film in no way discredits him as the actor portraying Deadpool in the future Deadpool feature. There are several sources that have interviewed with him and

324:

I have read this discussion and do not feel it is finished. Deadpool clearly says "Shh", which according to the Random House Dictionary is an interjection used to urge silence. I have added a source but user Friginator insists on removing it due to some personal bias against the way the character is

2805:

My problem is that he's lumping everything together as a whole, and deleting the stuff that HAS reliable sources as well. A lot of them HAVE reliable sources, and yet they're still getting removed. I'm in the process of finding more sources to fill in the blanks (though progress will be slow since

2399:

Tell me, Cameron, since you and Dodds are the ones who cleared out most of the info (a necessary move, though I still think it was taken a step too far), what would you say would be relevant story points to include in the bio? (considering that DP's starred in several minis and ongoings over his 20

2334:

Alrighty, I've updated both Deadpool and Cable & Deadpool's collected editions. I removed White Tiger and X-Force from Deadpool's because in White Tiger, I think he's in all of two pages, and the X-Force book actually takes place in the middle of Cable & Deadpool vol.3, so I added it there

1917:

For those who might not remember, Deadpool appeared in the alternate reality Earth of 5700. He was a member of the X-Men which was lead by Wolverine. Even here, he still retained most of his witty, psychotic character (though not his fourth wall breaking style) and even says that the only reason he

1660:

Pardon my lack of familiarity; I don't usually go much in depth with editing aside from fixing links and removing vandalism. I suppose a more accurate path of action would be to ask for mediation, since it doesn't feel like we're getting anywhere even after making changes to the article, since all

1396:

for character pages, Bio, Powers, and Alt Version sections are clearly listed. I agree that the section needs to be an outline and not a series of issue-by-issue occurences, but that's just it: you didn't outline anything; you guys just deleted the whole section outright (again, without consulting

1247:

I find the recent occurrences that have befallen this page to be quite disturbing. It wasn't enough that this little spat has caused the character's biography to be trashed. But now there is no information of the character to speak of, nor of its alternate versions. I say that whoever is doing this

899:

You understand the Knowledge rating quality system for articles? (I’ll presume you do) Well, Captain Marvel which is a featured article and that does not even *have* a fictional character bio, similarly Batman who has a 60 year plus history (deadpool has a 20 year history?) has a fictional bio that

753:

Still, did everything have to be erased. The only thing remaining of Deadpool's biography is a short snippet of his origins from where he was born to how he became the character. If anything, its earlier version was more informative about his involvement through many of the major arcs in the Marvel

712:

Honestly, I don't believe anyone here has a main job of trying to attack you and you alone. The editors focus on trying to clean up articles to get them to the best possible format that they can. You might have mentioned something that was going to be deleted anyway, no one is trying to offend you.

570:

Part of Deadpool's history, including his role in Secret Invasion as well as Dark Reign with his ongoing series, has been deleted. For what reason, I do not know. It could be a mistake but I added it back to be sure. I need someone to fix the links inside it because I am rather inexperienced at it.

177:

this was intended to be seen as the character "shushing" the audience then their may be a case for adding the info again. When a character looks into the camera, this does not, by most regular guidelines, constitute breaking the fourth wall, as it does not entail a character becoming aware of their

2422:

Clearly, the bio for this character will not be rewritten. It's been months since most of this information was terminated from the site. If there were to have been any progress, it would have been done sooner. And you know what would be good? If the high and mighty wizards Cameron and Dodds posted

1637:

You seem to be a bit confused about what WP:Comics is - anyone who edits it is "from" WP:COMICS. 1) treat the subject as object of the narrative. 2) using critical analysis from secondary sources to discuss plot points 3) avoid blow by blow issue by issue plot summaries. You stick to those and you

1548:

Well yes, it proberly is useless as a source but it can't just be edited by anyone, you need to login, but anyway, that realy isn't important, but what I was saying is that even though the information is too big, it is still needed for it to have bio & alt. versions, which this one doesn't, so

1503:

From what I see, the only real problem is two rules that Contradict each other, The Policy for Comic characters states that they should have a bio, but the primary source thing contradicts the way to get it, but to be honestly clear, almost everything, fictional or real world, comes from a primary

1220:

Thanks, glad to see someone's willing to lend a hand. I just re-did the In Other Media section, and I've already started re-writing the biography based on the previous one; I started with the new series since I figured it'd take the least time to do, and I managed to compress all 13 issues down to

1133:

From what I've gathered is that the three main points of removing the information is 1) It's too long, & 2) Fictional character Biographies break several policies, & 3) He's a fictional character, not real, well answers: 1) take out the fat or give it it's own page, 2) It's not just comics

274:

thank you. hopefully this will be a good enough compromise for everyone. i mean those like myself think because of the history of the character and the sound that its a "sh" get something, but those who, for an also equally valid reason like yourself, think that because it wasn't stated to be said

1994:

Well I'm not comic book expert, but I'm fairly certain Deadpool has the power to teleport. I mean wasn't that how he god rid of Al and escaped Tiamat (among other things). Just putting it out there, I'm not adding it because I don't feel like it and I have no source, but it is something that is

1719:

following the events of the past few issues, Deadpool is left very poor, to the point of doing very quick and easy hits, after assasinating a pizza boy Deadpool discovers that Osborn has diclared him a traitor to all humans after te events of the secret invasion storyline, as he's about to leave,

1005:

I've yet to see a fictional character bio/plot summary section that was sourced to anything but the primary sources. The bio is not the assertation of importance, but a thumbnail of the character's history. While I agree we need to take out the chainsaws and carve out a *lot* of fat in the bio,

989:

the comics themselves. As the comics are primary sources, they cannot assert importance, and imparting importance upon them without a citation by a secondary source constitutes original research, and any such information added to the article can be challenged and removed per Knowledge guidelines.

656:

Look Cameron Scott your just a bully with a computer if you don't get along with some one you delete stuff from that page, just go look for more spam and leave the comic section alone, oh your so great deleting information for no reason for your own gain, i mean does this really help some one who

342:

There's no need for personal insults. Please keep this civil. There isn't an official source (that I've found, at least) saying that it's intended to be a "Shh" noise. Knowledge is a place for encyclopedic facts, and anything open to interpretation shouldn't be commented on in the article. If you

249:

It's fine to state things that are clearly there, like the noise itself, but calling it a "shh" or "shush" is unsourced because it gives the sound meaning that isn't backed up with citations or references. Even if it's meant by the editor as onomatopoeia it can still be taken as meaning something

195:

i dont know if its breaking the fourth wall, nor do i care. but in the film it clearly is a "shhh". but it keeps being removed because its on the basis of speculation. but when it sounds excatly like a "shhh" and not a hsss, why is it speculation? i'm not speculating the reason behind it, im just

1009:

Since this seems to have become an issue as a result of a flubbed attempt at restoring an inappropriately-removed section of the bio, I'm going to go ahead and revert to the version that the section was removed from. There's no deadline, so let's discuss how to trim the fat out of the bio here

2786:

job to make sure that the section you restored is sourced properly. I think that it could be useful information worth including, but unless it's sourced soon it needs to be removed. Though not all unsourced material is original research, like WesleyDodds seems to be saying. And no, it doesn't

2168:

On the bibliography I took out some of the TPBs in the appearances list; I realise the having every single Deadpool appearance included is important, but the reader may be confused into buying the Wolverine: Origins Our War TPB, where if memory serves me right 'Pool appeared in one page only,

1774:

But we can't use them simply to provide lavish summaries of the plot. If all you can find about something in secondary sources is a review, then that's what you cite. People do actually write about notable works - Maus, Dark Knight Returns, Tin Tin in the Congo, Watchmen, Marvels, Miracleman,

1739:

Which is simply a summary of the plot based on the primary sources... You have to understand this, why we mention something is not because it happened in the comics but because independent reliable sources wrote about it. Batman Year one is a notable story because of the impact it had on the

2670:

You need to establish notability of super-powers via reliable secondary sources that deal with the subject in an out-of-universe manner. "Alternate versions" do not warrant a separate section, despite what you might see in other character articles; if they are notable, deal with them in the

2363:

I see that the same person that deleted Cable's history had a hand in doing this as well. I just don't see why we can't discuss this before ONE persone decides for everyone else what should be in the article. I understand Wiki's policies, but the fact of the matter is, there is barely any

2528:- does your passive aggressive manner normally get a response? Besides making you look like you lack the control of an adult, it does nothing for me. Drop me a line on my talkpage when you have worked on your selfcontrol and you aren't embarrassing yourself in a such a sorry manner. -- 473:

he is involved with the project. That doesn't mean that he won't be in the DP movie. Afterall, James Marsden still appeared in X3 despite being in Superman Returns. Sure, his role was reduced, but being in one did not remove him from the other. Until there is a source saying he

1376:

which is what I have been doing. One of the few articles in the comic area about a superhero that has been graded as FA (our highest level of quality) is that of Captain Marvel that does not even have a fictional bio, so it's a bizarre idea to suggest that one must be included.

2040:. However, Deadpool has not shown the ability to do so since he and Cable had their "divorce" (as the comics call it), and he certainly hasn't done it since Cable went to the future. So, with the exception of the film, Deadpool does not have the power to teleport.-- 1755:

If you read the policy for Primary sources closely then you can will read that they're usable but must be taken care of, & not misused, so we CAN use primary sources, especially since any secondary source would just be a review or summary of the primary sources.

2603:

Sorry. Anyway, Cameron's agreed to do some rewriting regarding the backstory, and I'm in the middle of searching for an external source with which to reinforce the existing sections. With any luck, we should have this whole thing taken care of relatively soon. --

2587:

Can we keep this discussion civil, please? It's not worth attacking each other. I definitely think that the info should stay, but it needs some work. Deleting it all doesn't seem helpful, but right now it lacks sources and isn't written in an encyclopedic manner.

211:

Because it's unsourced, for one thing. It's a hissing sound, but saying it's a "shhh" would mean something else. Regardless of how many times someone has seen it, that doesn't change what it is. "Shhh" is an interpretation of that paricular sound. That violates

289:

I'm sorry but he does break the fourth wall. It is OBVIOUSLY a shush or "shhh". Why would he look at the camera and hiss? He broke the fourth wall, it's obvious. You don't need the producers or directors to come out and say it, use your own brains.

536:, burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. So unless you can find a source in which Reynolds confirms that the Green Lantern casting won't mess with the Deadpool film, the older info shouldn't be kept in the article. 1460:

Basically we have a lot of crap articles that needs re-writing - part of the problem is that when people see the in-universe content, they thinks that's the right way to proceed. Clean-up of all of those types of articles is going to take years.

98:. While his mouth makes a hissing sound at the end, there's no good source given for that breaking the fourth wall. There was no gesture to indicate he was "shushing" in the first place. If this is going to be in an article, there needs to be a 599:

It was merged and edited into the publication section as part of an on-going effort to remove the lavish in-universe overdetail that exists in the fictional history. We treat characters as an object of the narrative not as if they are real.

196:

saying what happened considering ive had to hear that noise on a daily basis form having to clean up theaters as an usher. but if there must be decention about the noise, why cant it at the very least be put in the page that a noise is made?

1197:

At first, I was okay with the edits, not happy but okay. But now they have deleted so much, including his alt. versions. I will back you up if you decide to bring back the missing parts. Those two have ruined the page of a great anti-hero.

1100:

There is nothing in the Comics guidelines that rationalizes unsourced original research and overrelianece on in-universe descrption. In fact, the page has been tagged for cleanup to addess these problems. Please familiarize yourself with

2948:

that still doesn't mean the character's a direct alternate of Deadpool. If that were the case, then that would mean the actual Deathstroke could be considered an alternate version of Deadpool himself (which would be an oddity in itself).

2943:

Thirdly, there is the Swordsman of the Heroes Reborn Universe. Though he is rather normal and serious, it turns out that he was that universe's Deadpool who used to be the leader of that world's superhero group known as "The Remnants".

1221:

about a paragraph or two, so that gives us some room to work with. I'll try to knock out the Agent X run tonight, then work on Cable & Deadpool. If you could get a start on the Powers and Abilities section, that'd be great. --

1028:

What makes you think "fictional character biographies" are even approprite per general Wiki guidelines? It violates a number of policies, espcially concerning the use of primary sources, copyrighed material, and original research.

129:

Deadpool's actions do so. When he opens his eyes, he is looking directly to the audience through the camera shushes them verbally. In this case, a gesture such as raising a finger to his lips is irrelevant, as such an action as

1616:

we can ask about this so we have exact clarification regarding source citation for fictional bios? There's way too much conflicting information regarding both sides, and it'd be great if we could just get a straight answer. --

434:

If it wasn't written in books or websites or sourced in any way should we not add that the sun is hot to Knowledge? It's not our personal knowledge that it's hot, just our interpretation. Face it Friginator, you're on your own

1918:

was invited to join was so the team would have "a token human." Anyway, the character was part of a strike force to defeat the Director (and/or Sublime), but was killed when that world's Agent Zero was taken over by the foe.

1870:

There is a gap in the article in that no versions in the history has anyone written about the vol 1 period between issue 30 and the end of the series. Anyone want to add something to the publication history about this period?

1568:

KK, guys...just delete the freakin article, then, if its got SO many freakin probs...wilson's like, KK, but...this skeleton pg is just sad 2 look at...look, im srry, but mr. scott callin the pg crap is...nuff said, guyz...

2763:

Unless you actually HELP us look for 3rd party sources. Why are you so insistent on deleting anything you don't like instead of helping us actually improve the page WITHOUT sacrificing the article's informative nature? --

2400:

years, and it's not too hard to find sites that discuss them down to the issue) I mean, if you're paying such close attention to this page, you obviously must have knowledge of the character and his backstory, correct? --

2820:

Provide reliable third-party sources for this information. Right now the section is mere speculation and extrapolation of the source materiral, which is original research. It certainly doesn't warrant it's own section.

614:

yo, peepls, some1 stop dis guy...hes gonna delete evrytinh, like he did with taht doc dude's...plz, guys, dont let him do dis...HE'S ONLY DOIN IT CUZ I SAID I LIKED DEADPOOOL ON DR. STRANGE TALK, YO! SEE FR URSELVES!

1294:"Why did you choose the Deadpool article as the primary target of your so called editing?" because someone on another article said "why did you start with this article why not another article like deadpool?" We have 657:

just got in to deadpool and wanted to look him up, instead of taking the easy way out and deleting stuff you don't like why don't you actually read the comic and contribute to it (no wonder people don't like you)

2057:

I don't know where to add this, but doesn't Deadpool think in french at the end of Cable and Deadpool, issue #50 "my bon mots" after getting self-speared in the head? Shouldn't that be added to the languages he

2730:, the very first Deadpool solo comic. He recognizes and repeats the "KLIK" sound effect when a gun is pointed at his head. Something similar happens in Joe Kelly's first issue with the sound effect "PWANGG." 802:

Haha, I agree. And as for the comment below, by Mr. Deadpoolfan77, seriously, you speak of SPAM, and yet your messages look to me like SPAM. I'd much prefer proper English, if that is in any way possible. ;)

2618:

Okay, the Alternate Versions, Powers and Abilities, and Breaking the Fourth Wall sections are now sourced. Now that there's no risk of those being removed, we can concentrate on the Fictional Biography. --

2153:

I don't think there's a need for a bibliography in the article as long as you mention the titles that Deadpool starred in in the prose. Definitely don't need to list every single comic he ever appeared in.

1507:

The Merc's OFFICIAL Bio from Marvel's OFFICIAL website, which coincidently uses Wiki software, anyway, this is Marvel using it's primary source, creating this (Making it a secondary source) so it should be

2378:

Well write a bio then - but make sure it a) does not treats the character as an object of the narrative and b) is not written in an in-universe fashion. if you do it that way, it's impossible to delete.

1800:

has reviews & summaries about almost every issue of X-Men & related comics, I can't find a real character bio on Wade with this site, but it has the summary for most/all of his comic apearances.

1314:

heads to get what you want. Now unless you're going to stop acting like a baby and help us clean up the bio, powers, and alt versions sections (which, I might add, every character is entitled to under

1699:

At the same time, though, a lot of the details regarding development, reception, etc. have been deleted or moved to the publication history section, and I'd rater not have to repeat information... --

528:) is the opposite of how citations ought to work. Knowledge's content is based on reliable sources. You say we shouldn't jump the gun, yet that's exactly what you're doing. If someone were to write, " 2726:

I've removed the sentence claiming Deadpool's first example of breaking the fourth wall was in Deadpool #4. Just to clear thingfs up, the first example of Deadpool breaking the fourth wall was in

2093:

So, I've been keeping pretty up to date on DP's bib (particularly in the collected editions section), but I have a question: is Deadpool's collected editions more up to Wiki standards, or is the

2704:

Do you have reliable secondary sources to establish their notability? Because it not, it needs to be removed. Even if there are, it's best to deal with them in the publication history section.

1717:

All I see from all this is that we need to restore Wade's ifno & cut out some non important stuff, & then write every so often that he's a comic book character, or reference it, e.g.

1775:

Sandman, Preacher, Lost Girls, the league of extraordinary Gentlemen - the list is endless. If someone hasn't written about why Wade had an ham sandwich in page 34, why would we want to ? --

2073:

No. After all, a lot of people say things like "adios" and "gracias" when they can't speak spanish. Knowing a phrase or two doesn't necessarily constitute being fluent in the language.--

160:

I'm tired of you edit warring about this. Please stop adding unsourced, arbitrary, open-to-interpretation information to the article. That's not what Also understand that the article

2097:'s collected editions? I ask, becuase they are vastly different. I'd be willing to update either to meet Wiki standards, I'm just not positive on which is more correct. Help?-- 1549:

someone should repost them, I mean you can't just remove every in-verse info from every page on a fictional character or story plotline, & it would be pointless to try, --

377:

means. It also seems that you did not know, or perhaps forgotten, that Knowledge seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge. It is common knowledge that Deadpool says

2892:

It's not ready for GA - nowhere near. It could easily be a GA, but I think it will take a lot of work. I can agree with High importance due to popularity, but not Top.

1445:. I mean, if really necessary, I'll track down sources, but shouldn't Deadpool be held to the same standards as other comic book character articles or vice versa? -- 2877:

WikiProject Comics article. Seems to me like we ought to whip it into shape. Another editor suggested starting a Good Article Review for it. Thoughts/comments? --

788:

late and I can't work when I'm tired. However, I want to stress that while wiping out so much is a bad idea, the current set up will work for now. Good night.

2847:

I noticed that at the bottom bar of this page there is a hyperlink that says "c-class marvel characters." I personally think Deadpool is above the alphabet.

257:), as you did before is going too far. Obviously bringing the fourth wall into this is out of the question too. I'm fine with it the way it is now, though. 1720:

however, Osborn has a Hawkeye-dressed Bullseye attack him, after several fights, Deadpool beats Bullseye until he eventually gets taken to a local hospital

2874: 2032:. The comics' versions have had several teleportation devices that allow him to teleport to various locations. He did temporarily have the ability to 854:

guys, PLZ. i mean, scotts way obssessed with deletin EVRYTING HERE. mr. scott, serius, go cleen up SPAM. KK? ty much, yo. were cool, rite, mr,. scott?

684:

mr, scott, really...plz...i mean, this is just ridiculus...deadpool is really awsome; why u no do dis before, then, and second AFTER i mentioned? ???

1318:) instead of just going on a deletion spree for everything you don't like, I'll be forced to call in a dispute resolution moderator to remove you. -- 2499:

Fair enough, but then why aren't YOU helping to fix it since you were the one who scrapped it in the first place? Take some damn responsibility. --

1680:

You could ask for mediation but they are not going to tell you any different. The problems with in-universe entries and lengthy bios is discussed at

532:," THAT would be jumping the gun. If we don't know about something, we don't put it in the article. We don't assume when there is reason not to. Per 493: 2906:

Didn't it use to have a good article sticker? You know, that gold star on the top right of the page before it became the steamy remains it is now?

102:

good source. A blog claiming he was breaking the fourth wall wouldn't work. It would have to be Ryan Reynolds confirming it or something like that.

1337:

1) instead of just going on a deletion spree for everything you don't like, I'll be forced to call in a dispute resolution moderator to remove you.

2564:

I'll gladly drop you a line when you can show that you're actually willing to help FIX the page instead of just removing what's already there. --

2690:

The exemplar for WP:Comics disagrees with you on that point. It's clearly listed that Alternate Versions are deserving of their own section. --

1393: 1177: 309:

Well I feel the same way but I also agree as to why it should not be added. Unless you have something new to point out its just our opinions.

1475:

Cameron, please...not evry1 so happy you call their edits 'crap'...so...;) Coolio! gl here, man! ur a grate guy! hope evry1 likes u! :) :)

2791:

to be The section in question is all true, but just that doesn't work on Knowledge. There should be reliable sources to back up the facts.

2010:

Oh, he does (thanks to different incarnations of his teleportation belt over the years), but certain parties refuse to acknowledge it... --

1940:

Btw, "where is the ALternate version of Deadpool" section? The one with the altenate reality version of him.It seems someone deleted that.

351:

have been intended as a "Shh," but until there is a definitive source that confirms this, it shouldn't be added to an encyclopedia article.

2955: 2913: 2430: 2059: 1947: 1925: 1273: 932: 761: 2893: 2169:

similarly very limited appearances in Ms Marvel and Weapon X: First Class; I reserve judgement on White Tiger since I've not read that.

1827: 1070:

you should see about either doing an RfC or investigate policy on the Village Pump. I've re-reverted the article to status quo; can we

870: 700: 631: 511: 436: 3045: 2978: 2854: 811: 721: 2970:

Thanks for pointing out the DC addition! Also, could you give me a few sources that I could actually list in the article? ;) thanks!

2744:

There is no way this section can be kept without discussion by reliable third-party sources. As it stands it's original research and

3000: 297: 178:

fictional existence. I'm tired of fighting about this. I would like to ask you again to please stop acting like this. Thank you.

3033:

Ehh... I understand where you're coming from, but you know, just having similarities doesn't make it acceptable for an article.

2637:

You can't use mirrors of wikipedia content as a source for the article. It's a complete no-no as far as reliable sources go. --

2250: 2199: 2142: 1978: 1901: 1585: 1491: 1164: 843: 642:

Yes that's it - I'm cleaning up the article to comply with our minimum standards because you said you liked the character... --

925:

Another question. Why is it that all of the information (albeit theoretical or dry) of the discussion page has been deleted?

1526:

It's an open wiki which can be edited by anyone and therefore is worthless as a source and cannot be used in the article. --

1373:

editors should describe fictional elements in terms of how they relate to the real world, as fictional characters or topics.

2173:

21 August 2009 (P.S. btw how do you do that template thingie that automatically signs your name and date in talk pages?)

673: 585:

I assume it was deleted because it's so long, but I'm fine with it like that. Shortening it a bit wouldn't hurt, though.

2036:, which is essentially teleporting, but it had to do with being linked to Cable due to events in the first storyarc of 1102: 982: 2873:

In addition to being in the Top 50 most popular Knowledge articles for 2009 as mentioned above, this article is the

1130:(sighs...) well, this sure is gonna make cameron real popular with marvel users here...but not my business, so...:) 3065: 1442: 1441:

I get the idea because every other character's biography I've read uses nothing BUT primary sources. Just look at

38: 494:

http://splashpage.mtv.com/2009/07/21/ryan-reynolds-says-theres-no-rule-against-playing-deadpool-and-green-lantern/

1106: 978: 2882: 2369: 1929: 1277: 936: 765: 95: 2959: 2917: 2434: 2063: 1951: 1831: 347:"), I don't see why removing that would be a problem. I agree that it's not phrased very well. It definitely 173:. I'm sorry to seem rude, but please stop this. If you or another editor can find an appropriate source that 3108: 3103: 3098: 3086: 2897: 2858: 2642: 2533: 2490: 2384: 2340: 2117: 2102: 2078: 2045: 1876: 1780: 1745: 1689: 1643: 1531: 1466: 1431: 1382: 1303: 960: 866: 696: 647: 627: 605: 556: 507: 482: 440: 386: 330: 147: 81: 76: 71: 59: 3004: 1843:

is wrong, just that if you do it to 1 comic book character you have to do it fo rthe rest of them as well.

3043: 2976: 2811: 2769: 2695: 2656: 2624: 2609: 2569: 2504: 2464: 2405: 2267: 2015: 1806: 1761: 1727: 1704: 1666: 1622: 1603: 1554: 1513: 1450: 1411: 1323: 1226: 1185: 1139: 887: 809: 719: 301: 551:

As evident by my accidently unsigned post, there is a source. I have added it to the page now as well.--

2826: 2753: 2709: 2680: 2449: 2159: 1114: 1034: 995: 2444:

Two things: 1. We have lives, and 2. Fictional character biographies are being discouraged these days.

1371:

Editors should approach the discussion of fictional concepts within a "real world context"; this means

1362:

Since WP:COMIC says nothing of the sort I have no idea why you think that. What it *does* say is that

2996: 2951: 2909: 2850: 2796: 2735: 2593: 2426: 2238: 2187: 2176: 2130: 1966: 1943: 1921: 1889: 1854: 1823: 1573: 1479: 1269: 1152: 928: 858: 831: 757: 688: 661: 619: 590: 541: 499: 417: 356: 293: 262: 221: 183: 107: 216:. Unless there's a good source it'll need stay off the article. Knowledge is for proven facts only. 2878: 2365: 2354: 2246: 2195: 2138: 2094: 1974: 1897: 1581: 1487: 1424:

plot descriptions must include cited reference to critical analysis published in secondary sources.

1369:

plot descriptions must include cited reference to critical analysis published in secondary sources.

1160: 839: 314: 276: 233: 197: 2638: 2529: 2486: 2380: 2336: 2113: 2098: 2074: 2041: 1872: 1776: 1741: 1685: 1639: 1527: 1462: 1427: 1378: 1299: 1091: 1052: 1019: 956: 862: 692: 643: 623: 601: 552: 503: 478: 459:

How can it possibly be anything other than a shh? A hiss and a shh is a night and day difference.

382: 326: 143: 2300: 2170: 1996: 1844: 530:

Reynolds' casting in an upcoming Green Lantern film will delay his role in a Deadpool soo movie

3038: 2971: 2807: 2765: 2691: 2652: 2620: 2605: 2565: 2500: 2460: 2401: 2393:

Your inflexibility and your unwillingness to admit fault are truly awe-inspiring Pope Cameron

2321: 2263: 2011: 1802: 1757: 1723: 1700: 1662: 1618: 1599: 1550: 1509: 1446: 1407: 1319: 1222: 1181: 1135: 883: 804: 714: 669: 280: 237: 201: 2211:

For ~s (~~~~). Three of them will do just your signature, and five will do just a timestamp.

3023: 2822: 2779: 2749: 2705: 2676: 2445: 2286: 2221: 2155: 1613: 1355: 1315: 1203: 1110: 1081: 1044: 1030: 991: 793: 736: 576: 121:

to the title of the section in order to avoid confusion with the section on the page titled

2792: 2731: 2589: 2304: 2282: 2217: 2000: 1848: 586: 537: 413: 352: 258: 217: 179: 103: 2986: 407:

that may or may not be correct. It's definitely shared by a lot of people. It's actually

2990: 2350: 2242: 2191: 2134: 1970: 1893: 1681: 1577: 1483: 1156: 974: 835: 310: 1858: 1835: 1749: 1693: 1589: 1495: 1470: 1435: 1386: 1307: 1189: 1168: 1143: 999: 891: 874: 847: 704: 677: 651: 635: 609: 594: 580: 3074: 3034: 2067: 2004: 1087: 1075: 1066: 1048: 1015: 1011: 47: 17: 2317: 1367:

and should only outline the plot rather than describe minor details. Additionally,

1006:

dumping it entirely, just because it's sourced to primary sources, isn't necessary.

665: 213: 170: 165: 373:

I meant no offense Friginator, only that it seems that you do not understand what

1962:

um, no duh...ppls whos scared of wade erased EVERYTHING. but its ok with dem...

275:

noise also get something because we arent stating what the argument is. thank you

3073:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3019: 1199: 789: 732: 572: 533: 161: 126: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2126:

hmmm...maybe delte whole sec. to improve WIKIPEDEA? (just suggestion, man...)

2277: 2212: 1740:

development of the character, this can be sourced to secondary sources etc. --

1398: 1061:

Well, there's the fact that WP policy states that policies and guidelines are

1010:

instead of just hashing it out on the article itself, all right? (The "D" in

250:

completely different through reader interpretation. Even calling it dialogue (

139: 2543:

in this scenario when you've done absolutely nothing to help fix the problem?

1820:

He doesn't even have a character history anymore. Seriously, what the hell?

3047: 3027: 3008: 2980: 2963: 2921: 2901: 2886: 2862: 2830: 2815: 2800: 2773: 2757: 2739: 2713: 2699: 2684: 2660: 2646: 2628: 2613: 2597: 2573: 2537: 2508: 2494: 2468: 2453: 2438: 2409: 2388: 2373: 2358: 2344: 2325: 2308: 2293: 2271: 2254: 2228: 2203: 2163: 2146: 2121: 2106: 2082: 2049: 2019: 1982: 1955: 1933: 1905: 1880: 1810: 1784: 1765: 1731: 1708: 1670: 1647: 1626: 1607: 1558: 1535: 1517: 1454: 1415: 1350:

will have you blocked for personal attacks - just so we are clear on that.

1327: 1281: 1230: 1207: 1118: 1095: 1056: 1047:

standards, too, for guidance on these issues. Just thought of that now...

1038: 1023: 964: 940: 813: 797: 769: 740: 560: 545: 515: 486: 444: 421: 390: 360: 334: 318: 284: 266: 241: 225: 205: 187: 169:

add unsourced content to the article, which could very easily be considered

151: 111: 985:. Anything added to the page must be backed by reliable secondary sources, 2651:

Dammit, I didn't even notice that. This is harder than I thought... --

524:

I don't want to fight about it either, but the argument you're using, (

1505: 713:

If you're a deadpool fan, go write on him on the X-Men Wikia website.

1402: 2940:

killed by an alternate She-Hulk (who I think was her worlds Hulk).

2671:"Publication history" section. Overall, the stories themselves are 1346:

if you continue to make statements like "Stop acting like a baby",

1078:

to work out what material needs to be cut to trim down the article

2024:

Actually, the only version of Deadpool to have teleportation as a

1333:

Some fairly bizzare statements, it's hard to know where to start:

94:

I've removed the statement that, in the post-credits scene from

134:

does not actually require it. The sound he makes is clearly a

3052: 1798: 1298:

of articles and you can't edit them all at the same time... --

977:

and junked the fictional characer bio. It was based solely on

25: 3037:, so it doesn't work. DC and Marvel are completely separate. 1422:

relevance without getting into original research? read again

1043:

Now that I think about it, we should probably also check the

1354:

2)(which, I might add, every character is entitled to under

1148:

yeah...but no1 cares now bout marvel WIKIPEDIA pgs...so...

1109:

to understand why most of the article needs to be removed.

1086:, as that's the appropriate WikiProject for the article? 827:...Cute...like, she watns proper english...on TALK pg... 2987:

http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix3/deadpoolvisions.htm

1684:

which is a good read for anyone new to the concept. --

343:

feel that the way it's currently stated is unclear ("

2991:

http://marvel.wikia.com/Wade_Wilson_%28Earth-5021%29

2985:Here's the source for Millennial Visions version ( 1365:Summarization should never be on a per-issue basis 2936:five X-Men and they all hid out in Tokyo, Japan. 1885:Um, not really...no1 likes the pg now, so...:) 1065:, not prescriptive, and the little issue that 477:playing Deadpool, we shouldn't jump the gun.-- 8: 2234:girl, yo, just tell me were the buton IS!! 2179:comment added 11:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC). 125:. Under the description made on the page 526:Until there is a source saying he isn't 3071:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2112:Cable and deadpool needs a rewrite. -- 1394:Knowledge:WikiProject_Comics/exemplars 1392:And yet according to the exemplars at 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2183:ditto! tell us, sine! HOW? (plz...) 7: 468:Reynolds: Deadpool and Green Lantern 1722:or something among those lines. -- 24: 3018:but I'll leave it alone for now. 2869:Third most popular comics article 2778:Actually Cyberlink, according to 2262:Directly below toe "Esc" button. 1074:follow the D ("Discuss") part of 3056: 2806:I'll be busy all weekend)... -- 2722:Breaking the Fourth Wall Section 29: 2675:acceptable forms of reference. 2349:this 'damn article'...? lol... 1178:WP:WikiProject_Comics/exemplars 90:Movie: Breaking the fourth wall 2740:00:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 2389:20:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2374:19:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2359:21:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 138:and not a hiss as can be seen 1: 3048:03:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC) 3028:21:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 3009:07:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC) 2981:05:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 2964:04:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 2728:Deadpool: The Circle Chase #1 2526:Take some damn responsibility 2083:03:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 2068:02:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 1859:10:39, 21 November 2009 (UTC) 1443:Fictional history of Superman 1076:the Bold-Revert-Discuss cycle 2922:19:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) 2902:23:58, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 2887:23:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 2831:23:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC) 2816:04:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 2801:23:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2774:15:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2758:08:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2714:10:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC) 2700:13:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2685:08:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 2661:15:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2647:15:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2629:15:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2614:14:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2598:02:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2574:21:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 2538:15:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 2509:15:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 2495:10:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 2469:00:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 2454:11:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 2439:01:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 1836:22:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 2863:22:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 2410:01:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 2345:04:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2326:01:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 2309:11:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2294:05:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 2272:18:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 2255:18:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 2229:15:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 2204:15:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 2164:07:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 2147:18:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 2122:05:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 2107:17:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 2050:14:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 2020:12:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 2005:08:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1983:17:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1956:15:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 1934:05:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 1906:18:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1881:09:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 1811:19:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 1785:13:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 1766:13:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 1750:08:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC) 1732:17:16, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1709:23:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1694:22:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1671:20:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1648:20:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1627:20:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1608:20:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1590:18:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1559:17:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1536:16:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1518:16:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1496:17:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1471:16:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1455:14:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1436:14:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1416:14:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1387:13:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1328:12:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1308:06:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1282:04:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1231:00:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1208:00:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1190:19:46, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1169:16:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 1144:19:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1119:01:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 1103:Knowledge:Original research 1096:23:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1057:23:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC) 1039:09:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC) 1024:23:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC) 1000:10:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC) 965:20:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 941:15:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 892:14:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC) 875:09:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 848:17:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 814:21:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 798:03:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 770:01:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 741:23:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 705:17:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 678:07:25, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 652:07:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 636:07:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 610:06:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 595:03:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 581:01:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 445:13:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 422:03:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 391:00:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC) 361:20:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 335:20:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 164:is not policy of any kind. 3127: 2989:) and the Exiles version ( 723:22:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC 2028:is the film version from 1504:source, but I have this: 1107:Knowledge:Primary sources 561:01:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 546:01:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 516:01:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 487:01:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 319:16:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC) 2316:Fix this damn article! ( 2030:X-Men Origins: Wolverine 285:02:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 267:01:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 242:22:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 226:17:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 206:05:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 188:07:59, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 152:05:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 123:Breaking the fourth wall 112:03:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 96:X-Men Origins: Wolverine 565: 1989: 1612:Is there someone from 3069:of past discussions. 42:of past discussions. 2095:Cable & Deadpool 2038:Cable & Deadpool 1080:while still meeting 2931:Alternate Deadpools 2875:third most popular 1803:The One & Only 1758:The One & Only 1724:The One & Only 1638:can't go wrong. -- 1600:The One & Only 1551:The One & Only 1510:The One & Only 1136:The One & Only 884:The One & Only 566:Deadpool's History 3114: 3113: 3081: 3080: 3075:current talk page 2999:comment added by 2954:comment added by 2912:comment added by 2853:comment added by 2429:comment added by 2258: 2241:comment added by 2207: 2190:comment added by 2150: 2133:comment added by 1990:Deadpool's powers 1986: 1969:comment added by 1946:comment added by 1924:comment added by 1909: 1892:comment added by 1826:comment added by 1593: 1576:comment added by 1499: 1482:comment added by 1272:comment added by 1172: 1155:comment added by 983:original research 931:comment added by 878: 861:comment added by 851: 834:comment added by 760:comment added by 708: 691:comment added by 681: 664:comment added by 639: 622:comment added by 519: 502:comment added by 296:comment added by 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3118: 3095: 3083: 3082: 3060: 3059: 3053: 3041: 3011: 2974: 2966: 2924: 2865: 2441: 2292: 2289: 2276:I'm not a girl. 2257: 2235: 2227: 2224: 2206: 2184: 2180: 2149: 2127: 1985: 1963: 1958: 1936: 1908: 1886: 1862: 1838: 1797:Well this site: 1592: 1570: 1498: 1476: 1284: 1171: 1149: 943: 877: 855: 850: 828: 807: 772: 717: 707: 685: 680: 658: 638: 616: 518: 496: 305: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3126: 3125: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3091: 3057: 3039: 2994: 2972: 2949: 2933: 2907: 2871: 2848: 2845: 2724: 2424: 2287: 2280: 2236: 2222: 2215: 2185: 2174: 2128: 2091: 1992: 1964: 1941: 1919: 1915: 1887: 1868: 1852: 1821: 1571: 1477: 1267: 1150: 981:and constiuted 979:primary sources 926: 856: 829: 805: 755: 715: 686: 659: 617: 568: 497: 492:Recent source: 470: 291: 92: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3124: 3122: 3112: 3111: 3106: 3101: 3096: 3089: 3079: 3078: 3061: 3051: 3050: 3040:JesterCountess 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 2973:JesterCountess 2956:67.166.142.254 2932: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2914:67.166.142.254 2879:GentlemanGhost 2870: 2867: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2723: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2632: 2631: 2616: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2431:67.166.142.254 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2366:Drunknesmonsta 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2297: 2296: 2274: 2232: 2231: 2111: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2060:98.122.133.114 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 1991: 1988: 1960: 1959: 1948:67.224.232.184 1926:67.172.178.127 1914: 1911: 1867: 1864: 1857:comment added 1841: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1769: 1768: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1712: 1711: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1521: 1520: 1458: 1457: 1419: 1418: 1331: 1330: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1274:67.172.178.127 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1041: 1007: 972: 970: 969: 968: 967: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 933:67.172.178.127 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 904: 903: 902: 901: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 762:67.172.178.127 746: 745: 744: 743: 725: 724: 567: 564: 549: 548: 521: 520: 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 427: 426: 425: 424: 405:interpretation 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 366: 365: 364: 363: 322: 321: 272: 271: 270: 269: 229: 228: 193: 192: 191: 190: 155: 154: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3123: 3110: 3107: 3105: 3102: 3100: 3097: 3094: 3090: 3088: 3085: 3084: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3067: 3062: 3055: 3054: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3042: 3036: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2979: 2977: 2975: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2930: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2894:204.153.84.10 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2868: 2866: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2842: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2742: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2721: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2674: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2639:Cameron Scott 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2617: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530:Cameron Scott 2527: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2487:Cameron Scott 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2442: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2381:Cameron Scott 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2361: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337:TriPredRavage 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2299:Cheers buddy 2295: 2290: 2284: 2279: 2275: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2230: 2225: 2219: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2181: 2178: 2172: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2151: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114:Cameron Scott 2109: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2099:TriPredRavage 2096: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075:TriPredRavage 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2042:TriPredRavage 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1987: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1912: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1883: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873:Cameron Scott 1865: 1863: 1860: 1856: 1850: 1846: 1839: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828:24.13.140.179 1825: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777:Cameron Scott 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1742:Cameron Scott 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686:Cameron Scott 1683: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1640:Cameron Scott 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528:Cameron Scott 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463:Cameron Scott 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1428:Cameron Scott 1425: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1404: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1379:Cameron Scott 1375: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1360: 1359: 1357: 1351: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1300:Cameron Scott 1297: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1131: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1083: 1077: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 988: 984: 980: 976: 966: 962: 958: 957:Cameron Scott 953: 952: 951: 950: 942: 938: 934: 930: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 879: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863:Deadpoolfan77 860: 852: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 815: 812: 810: 808: 801: 800: 799: 795: 791: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 771: 767: 763: 759: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 742: 738: 734: 729: 728: 727: 726: 722: 720: 718: 711: 710: 709: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693:Deadpoolfan77 690: 682: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 654: 653: 649: 645: 644:Cameron Scott 640: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624:Deadpoolfan77 621: 612: 611: 607: 603: 602:Cameron Scott 597: 596: 592: 588: 583: 582: 578: 574: 563: 562: 558: 554: 553:TriPredRavage 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 517: 513: 509: 505: 504:TriPredRavage 501: 495: 491: 490: 489: 488: 484: 480: 479:TriPredRavage 476: 467: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 446: 442: 438: 437:60.240.126.92 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 423: 419: 415: 410: 406: 402: 401: 400: 399: 392: 388: 384: 383:Faethon Ghost 380: 376: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 345:makes a noise 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 332: 328: 327:Faethon Ghost 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 306: 303: 299: 295: 287: 286: 282: 278: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 239: 235: 227: 223: 219: 215: 210: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 189: 185: 181: 176: 172: 167: 163: 159: 158: 157: 156: 153: 149: 145: 144:TriPredRavage 141: 137: 133: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 114: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 18:Talk:Deadpool 3092: 3070: 3064: 3016: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2872: 2855:66.25.91.182 2846: 2808:Cyberlink420 2788: 2783: 2766:Cyberlink420 2748:be removed. 2745: 2743: 2727: 2725: 2692:Cyberlink420 2672: 2669: 2653:Cyberlink420 2621:Cyberlink420 2606:Cyberlink420 2586: 2566:Cyberlink420 2525: 2501:Cyberlink420 2461:Cyberlink420 2402:Cyberlink420 2392: 2377: 2362: 2348: 2333: 2298: 2264:DurinsBane87 2233: 2182: 2167: 2152: 2125: 2110: 2092: 2089:Bibliography 2056: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2012:Cyberlink420 1993: 1961: 1916: 1884: 1869: 1840: 1819: 1738: 1718: 1701:Cyberlink420 1679: 1663:Cyberlink420 1619:Cyberlink420 1567: 1474: 1459: 1447:Cyberlink420 1423: 1420: 1408:Cyberlink420 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1332: 1320:Cyberlink420 1295: 1293: 1223:Cyberlink420 1182:Cyberlink420 1174: 1147: 1132: 1129: 1079: 1071: 1062: 986: 971: 880: 853: 826: 683: 655: 641: 613: 598: 584: 569: 550: 529: 525: 474: 471: 408: 404: 403:It's common 378: 374: 348: 344: 323: 288: 273: 253: 251: 230: 194: 174: 171:edit warring 135: 131: 122: 118: 99: 93: 65: 43: 37: 3063:This is an 3001:76.20.30.41 2995:—Preceding 2950:—Preceding 2908:—Preceding 2849:—Preceding 2823:WesleyDodds 2750:WesleyDodds 2706:WesleyDodds 2677:WesleyDodds 2446:WesleyDodds 2425:—Preceding 2237:—Preceding 2186:—Preceding 2175:—Preceding 2156:WesleyDodds 2129:—Preceding 1965:—Preceding 1942:—Preceding 1920:—Preceding 1888:—Preceding 1853:—Preceding 1822:—Preceding 1572:—Preceding 1478:—Preceding 1268:—Preceding 1151:—Preceding 1111:WesleyDodds 1063:descriptive 1031:WesleyDodds 992:WesleyDodds 927:—Preceding 857:—Preceding 830:—Preceding 756:—Preceding 687:—Preceding 660:—Preceding 618:—Preceding 498:—Preceding 292:—Preceding 162:fourth wall 127:Fourth Wall 117:I've added 36:This is an 2793:Friginator 2732:Friginator 2590:Friginator 2335:instead.-- 2171:User:Ermol 2034:Body Slide 1913:Earth-5700 1399:Spider-Man 1343:don't have 587:Friginator 538:Friginator 414:Friginator 353:Friginator 298:82.34.35.2 259:Friginator 218:Friginator 180:Friginator 104:Friginator 3109:Archive 5 3104:Archive 4 3099:Archive 3 3093:Archive 2 3087:Archive 1 2780:WP:BURDEN 2351:Tubesgirl 2243:Tubesgirl 2192:Tubesgirl 2135:Tubesgirl 1995:missing. 1971:Tubesgirl 1894:Tubesgirl 1614:WP:COMICS 1578:Tubesgirl 1508:useful.-- 1484:Tubesgirl 1356:WP:COMICS 1341:Since we 1316:WP:COMICS 1296:thousands 1157:Tubesgirl 1084:standards 1082:WP:COMICS 1045:WP:COMICS 836:Tubesgirl 311:Thefro552 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2997:unsigned 2952:unsigned 2910:unsigned 2851:unsigned 2427:unsigned 2251:contribs 2239:unsigned 2200:contribs 2188:unsigned 2143:contribs 2131:unsigned 1979:contribs 1967:unsigned 1944:unsigned 1922:unsigned 1902:contribs 1890:unsigned 1851:)red08 1824:unsigned 1586:contribs 1574:unsigned 1492:contribs 1480:unsigned 1270:unsigned 1165:contribs 1153:unsigned 1088:rdfox 76 1049:rdfox 76 1016:rdfox 76 929:unsigned 871:contribs 859:unsigned 844:contribs 832:unsigned 758:unsigned 701:contribs 689:unsigned 674:contribs 662:unsigned 632:contribs 620:unsigned 571:Thanks. 512:contribs 500:unsigned 294:unsigned 132:shushing 3066:archive 2782:, it's 2318:JoeLoeb 2177:undated 2058:speaks? 1855:undated 1682:WP:IN-U 975:WP:BOLD 666:Wadex92 435:here.-- 409:because 277:Largoss 234:Largoss 198:Largoss 39:archive 3035:WP:NOR 3020:Atin25 1426:. -- 1403:Batman 1200:Atin25 1072:please 1067:WP:IAR 1012:WP:BRD 973:I was 806:Aparna 790:Atin25 733:Atin25 716:Aparna 573:Atin25 175:proves 2301:Ermol 2278:EVula 2213:EVula 2026:power 1997:Adroa 1845:Red08 475:isn't 349:could 214:WP:OR 166:WP:OR 142:. -- 119:Movie 16:< 3024:talk 3005:talk 2960:talk 2918:talk 2898:talk 2883:talk 2859:talk 2827:talk 2812:talk 2797:talk 2789:have 2784:your 2770:talk 2754:talk 2746:must 2736:talk 2710:talk 2696:talk 2681:talk 2657:talk 2643:talk 2625:talk 2610:talk 2594:talk 2570:talk 2534:talk 2505:talk 2491:talk 2465:talk 2450:talk 2435:talk 2406:talk 2385:talk 2370:talk 2355:talk 2341:talk 2322:talk 2305:talk 2283:talk 2268:talk 2247:talk 2218:talk 2196:talk 2160:talk 2139:talk 2118:talk 2103:talk 2079:talk 2064:talk 2046:talk 2016:talk 2001:talk 1975:talk 1952:talk 1930:talk 1898:talk 1877:talk 1849:talk 1832:talk 1807:talk 1781:talk 1762:talk 1746:talk 1728:talk 1705:talk 1690:talk 1667:talk 1644:talk 1623:talk 1604:talk 1582:talk 1555:talk 1532:talk 1514:talk 1488:talk 1467:talk 1451:talk 1432:talk 1412:talk 1383:talk 1324:talk 1304:talk 1278:talk 1227:talk 1204:talk 1186:talk 1161:talk 1140:talk 1115:talk 1105:and 1092:talk 1053:talk 1035:talk 1020:talk 1014:.) 996:talk 961:talk 937:talk 888:talk 867:talk 840:talk 794:talk 766:talk 737:talk 697:talk 670:talk 648:talk 628:talk 606:talk 591:talk 577:talk 557:talk 542:talk 534:WP:V 508:talk 483:talk 441:talk 418:talk 387:talk 357:talk 331:talk 315:talk 302:talk 281:talk 263:talk 254:says 238:talk 222:talk 202:talk 184:talk 148:talk 140:here 108:talk 100:very 2993:) 2673:not 2285:// 2281:// 2220:// 2216:// 1866:gap 1401:or 987:not 379:Shh 375:shh 252:he 136:shh 3026:) 3007:) 2962:) 2920:) 2900:) 2885:) 2861:) 2843:C- 2829:) 2814:) 2799:) 2772:) 2756:) 2738:) 2712:) 2698:) 2683:) 2659:) 2645:) 2627:) 2612:) 2596:) 2572:) 2536:) 2507:) 2493:) 2467:) 2452:) 2437:) 2408:) 2387:) 2379:-- 2372:) 2357:) 2343:) 2324:) 2307:) 2291:// 2270:) 2253:) 2249:• 2226:// 2202:) 2198:• 2162:) 2145:) 2141:• 2120:) 2105:) 2081:) 2066:) 2048:) 2018:) 2003:) 1981:) 1977:• 1954:) 1932:) 1904:) 1900:• 1879:) 1871:-- 1834:) 1809:) 1801:-- 1783:) 1764:) 1756:-- 1748:) 1730:) 1707:) 1692:) 1669:) 1646:) 1625:) 1606:) 1588:) 1584:• 1557:) 1534:) 1516:) 1494:) 1490:• 1469:) 1461:-- 1453:) 1434:) 1414:) 1385:) 1377:-- 1326:) 1306:) 1280:) 1229:) 1206:) 1188:) 1167:) 1163:• 1142:) 1117:) 1094:) 1055:) 1037:) 1022:) 998:) 963:) 939:) 890:) 873:) 869:• 846:) 842:• 796:) 768:) 739:) 703:) 699:• 676:) 672:• 650:) 634:) 630:• 608:) 600:-- 593:) 579:) 559:) 544:) 514:) 510:• 485:) 443:) 420:) 389:) 381:. 359:) 333:) 317:) 304:) 283:) 265:) 240:) 224:) 204:) 186:) 150:) 110:) 3077:. 3022:( 3003:( 2958:( 2916:( 2896:( 2881:( 2857:( 2825:( 2810:( 2795:( 2768:( 2752:( 2734:( 2708:( 2694:( 2679:( 2655:( 2641:( 2623:( 2608:( 2592:( 2568:( 2532:( 2503:( 2489:( 2463:( 2448:( 2433:( 2404:( 2383:( 2368:( 2353:( 2339:( 2328:) 2320:( 2303:( 2288:☯ 2266:( 2245:( 2223:☯ 2194:( 2158:( 2137:( 2116:( 2101:( 2077:( 2062:( 2044:( 2014:( 1999:( 1973:( 1950:( 1928:( 1896:( 1875:( 1861:. 1847:( 1830:( 1805:( 1779:( 1760:( 1744:( 1726:( 1703:( 1688:( 1665:( 1642:( 1621:( 1602:( 1580:( 1553:( 1530:( 1512:( 1486:( 1465:( 1449:( 1430:( 1410:( 1381:( 1358:) 1348:I 1322:( 1302:( 1276:( 1225:( 1202:( 1184:( 1159:( 1138:( 1113:( 1090:( 1051:( 1033:( 1018:( 994:( 959:( 935:( 886:( 865:( 838:( 792:( 764:( 735:( 695:( 668:( 646:( 626:( 604:( 589:( 575:( 555:( 540:( 506:( 481:( 439:( 416:( 385:( 355:( 329:( 313:( 300:( 279:( 261:( 236:( 220:( 200:( 182:( 146:( 106:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index