Talk:Disney (disambiguation)

2605:"refer to other stuff": all of it properties of this company. They're all subtopics, and in no version of the world are they regularly referred to just as "Disney" by themselves without having already been clarified earlier in the name material, or being uniquely clear already due to the specific context in which the sentence was found. In particular, since you and a several others here keep harping on this, I challenge you to find any source anywhere on planet earth referring to the person Walt Disney simply as "Disney" without also giving his full name in the same material to make it clear they mean the person not the company, the latter being overwhelmingly what the string "Disney" means to virtually everyone all the time. 1580:

the rest of the text. Regardless, the sheer amount of it is suspect. Conventionally, we'd be looking for e.g. ~90% people landing at the primary topic and not reaching for navigation aids, and while we can't confirm that measurement here because we can't discern the Walt links, it sure sounds like the ratio might not be that good. From the WikiNav graph at the disambiguation page, it's apparent that most people who got there were looking for people, so even if those ratios are relatively small (around 6-8% in this sample) they're also indicative of ambiguity.

1685:

just 2001, #7 Gabler (2006) about the person, #8 Wills (2017) about company culture referencing the person in the blurb, #9 Quinn (2014) about the person, #10 Sandlin & Garlen (2016) about the company. Adding &pws=0 to the query string didn't change this. It seems Google thinks it's very likely their readers meant Walt when they look for Disney in a book search. And then we're back at the perennial question - is a lookup into an encyclopedia more like a book search or a general search or what. I'd lean towards the more academic options there. --

159: 997:

2015, 2017, and 2022) to see Disney fans from different fandoms share their interest in "Disney" and slowly realize that the word "Disney" means very different things to different people. For example, like most normal people, visiting a Disney park once every five years is more than enough, because I am primarily a fan of Disney films and television shows. I find it very amusing that there are people who visit a Disney park every year, every month, every week, or even every day. --

1035: 287: 149: 131: 233: 215: 22: 71: 53: 1394:, but the idea that there were films specifically associated with Walt Disney is perfectly sensible as well. There's other phrases that could be particularly associated with people, like "Disney dynasty", but we wouldn't use them as the determinative example of what constitutes the entire extent of the meaning of "Disney". -- 2768:

technically correct and legally. The disambiguation page for Disney is really only necessary for other secondary and tertiary meanings of the term and that includes the company's founder who is rarely mentioned compared to the company itself ... without taking anything away from his accomplishments or historic importance.

1958:

Yeah, we have a long history of doing that, and I've probably done that myself in the past, but I started to waver when I learned more about the behaviors of the readers from the clickstream visualizations in WikiNav. (That tool was made in 2021, so for example it wasn't even available at the time of

1579:

The two most common topics are the person and their eponymous company, clearly, yet because they're so intertwined, and we don't have measurements that are that precise, it's still hard to say how many people click the Walt Disney link in the hatnote as opposed to the Walt Disney links in the lead or

1139:

are convincing, I feel the company still has greater long-term significance and modern-day relevance (considering it's still around and actively contributing to society) that gives it an edge over what readers are likely looking for. Within articles, when we say "Disney did this", we usually mean the

2673:

No, I'm saying that this distinction of "except as a shorthand after already giving his full name" is critical there, and that it is not helpful for the purposes of reader navigation. We're effectively pretending that that sort of usage is not a good source of ambiguity and we decide not to help the

996:

applies here. As I pointed out in opposing the recent proposed RM to move the company to this title, "Disney" can refer to the man, the company, the animated movies, the live-action movies, the TV shows, the parks, the merchandise, etc. It is always funny at D23 Expo (I have attended three times, in

2290:

That's because they both have two uses that are widely used on their own (that is, without tacking on extra words). But when it comes to Disney, no one will say "Disney" without stating his first name, but you'll find many, many articles (both in the news and on Knowledge) that say "Disney" without

1684:

To try to verify this, I tried going to Google Books, clicked show English sources and 21st century, which showed me #1 Stewart (2005) about the company, #2 Schickel (2019) about the person, #3 Watts (2013) about the person, #4 ditto just 2001, #5 Disney Institute (2003) about the company, #6 ditto

1018:

and my comments at the prior RM mentioned. There is clearly no primary target for "Disney" as some, like myself, mainly think of the company while others think of the studio, Walt Disney, etc. Several trade reports and news headlines use "Disney" to refer to a multitude of these differing subjects,

2651:

with no basis. I've actually done quite a bit of source-background checking (when this was RMed before), and RS that refer to the person Walt Disney as simply "Disney" (except as a shorthand after already giving his full name) verge on non-existent. "Disney" in modern RS material almost invariably

1270:

You're describing the article style when editing, but what we care most when discussing primary topic by usage is reader behavior and expectations. The idea that an average English reader encounters the term "Disney" in reference to a person and then looks that up in the encyclopedia, expecting in

1182:

Sure you can use the single word 'Disney' to refer to Walt. Disney created Mickey Mouse. Disney introduced children to the possibility of space travel. Disney's vision created "Disneyland". And if I may, let me apologize on behalf of Walt Disney that he died, thereby shirking his responsibility to

1285:

It's the same outside of editing. When you hear "Disney film", you are more likely to interpret that as "a film produced by Walt Disney Pictures", not "a film produced by Walt Disney (the person)". If you type "Disney" into the search bar, you are more likely looking for the company — if you were

1344:

The relevancy exists in the full honor and recognition of the life and accomplishments of Walt Disney, and all of the corporate logos containing his signature attest to this long-term historical importance of the name 'Disney' when referring to both 'Walt Disney' and the companies which bear his

1725:

Yes, as I already said in my last couple of sentences above... let me try to be a bit more illustrative with this line of reasoning: if we think of Knowledge as the equivalent of the regular search or the news search, as something that should be guided by the same principles, then it's clear we

1241:

Hmm. I don't think the idea that a person is typically introduced with a full name and is then referred to by a surname is any more relevant here than the idea that typically the readers are looking for the company. It's probably fair to say that the terms "Disney" and "Walt Disney" are largely

1067:

and their impact on societal norms in both the early age of television and later, is profound. Walt Disney catapulted several cartoon characters to icons, introduced a generation to space, and had a vision which came about at exactly the right time to create these affects. The individual has at

2767:

I am late to this discussion but I would also like to register my opinion against such a rename. "Disney" commonly refers to the corporation and this is completely compatible with the article having the name "The Walt Disney Company" as a natural disambiguation and as the name that is more

2052:

the primary topic. The number of times that Walt Disney, as a biographical subject, is referred to as just "Disney" is vanishingly small by comparison and almost always in a context in which his first and last name were just given a moment earlier in the material. The article presently at

1670:, without qualification, it's unlikely anyone would think they meant him. That the previous RM failed to reach a conclusion to actually move it there is immaterial. This change of primary topic from the long-term status quo is not at all merited, for procedural reasons or any other. — 2674:

readers who encounter that usage navigate faster. At the same time we decide it's fine to use the shorthand for the company, and we will help the readers who encounter that to navigate faster. This is a fairly arbitrary choice of which contingent of readers to assist more. --

2632:

There's no proof whatsoever this number of times is "vanishingly small", and indeed we have the clickstreams to actually indicate otherwise (though it can't be conclusive because of the large amount of topical overlap). Can you please not reach for so much hyperbole? :)

2538:

Also there's an ongoing RM to move Flint to Flint (rock) and the DAB to Flint, I do support that as Flint, MI is the highest in usage I would also support redirecting Flint to Flint, MI. Primary topic should not just matter by long term-significance but also usage.

1329:

I clearly wrote "Walt Disney Pictures" in my comment, not "Walt Disney Studios". No one really uses the term "Disney film" to refer to films distributed by Walt Disney Studios (which includes Fox, Marvel, Star Wars, etc.). But I'm not sure how that's relevant?

1359:"honor and recognition" have absolutely nothing to do with WP title policy and procedures. This very strange perception of yours to the contrary is also behind your constant attept to overcapitalize things as signification of importance/prominence, against 2697:, my opinion has not changed since the last one I participated in. And also there have been 2 previous move requests since then on this page, both having been closed the same way. That to me suggests that this isn't likely to get much support. ― 2356:

Disney can even refer to other stuff. The Disney family, the theme parks, the studios, the cities, the people, the companies, and etc!. I strongly believe there's no primary topic for Disney despite the company being the most common use.

1889:

I like the argument about a broad concept. I don't think the links are too relevant, because that would be deciding on what we show to (a huge amount of) readers based on the behavior of (a comparatively tiny amount of) editors.

1835:

Some of these are probably problematic, and it's possible they haven't been thoroughly evaluated with the primary topic guidelines in mind, but have rather grown organically like that. Two wrongs don't make a right, though.

2065:, since that is far and away the most common name used to refer to the company in independent sources, and matchingly the vast majority of mentions of "Disney" in those sources is in reference to the company) already links 1140:

company (which can be referred to as "Disney" without ever using its expanded form), whereas it is not possible for us to use "Disney" to refer to Walt Disney without mentioning his full name once. The RM that did not move

440:. I find that using The Walt Disney Company as the catch all would force the reader of the original page to try to figure out what subsidiary was intended to be referred to by the link. ppblais 18:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 2495: 2145:

Prove me wrong. Just because we have a page at a policy-non-compliant title for the time being doesn't mean I'm going to sit idly by and let the situation get worse with a related RM that also should not happen.

2094:

It seems like that it feels too simple to call it just "Disney" as there are other purposes, if anything. it could be called just Disney (company) although I oppose moving The Walt Disney Company to Disney

2553:

You seem to think a primary topic is determined solely by pageviews, which like I said is not the case. Unlike the two Disneys and the two Coachellas, flint has existed since ... the Stone Age, literally.

1583:

Trying to present all this ambiguity to the readers in a more straightforward way is probably a worthwhile endeavor. If not, in a few months time we'll have the data to support a revert either way, and

1256:

See my reply above. "Disney" can act as a shorthand for the company without ever invoking its full name; "Disney" can only act as a shorthand for the person only after his full name is stated once.

2716:

per many of the above comments. The term "Disney" in 2024 (or really any time in the last 20+ years) almost always is in reference to the company, not its founder. 05:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

1708: 1291: 545: 638:

The company is obviously primary. The man is/was not mononymous; Disney is just his surname, so to refer to him by just that name you have to establish context for it, such as in his bio.

2227:

If it were not precise enough, then it would not be possible for about 95% of references to the company in the mainstream media to simply be "Disney" without further disambiguation. QED.

1462:

Compared to the time of the previous RM, these days we have more clickstream analysis tools and a better understanding of them - still not great, but better. We can look at the data from

2823: 2490:

Probably because you argued solely on the basis of pageviews (and from a single month), which are often not convincing enough to establish a primary topic. You should have pointed to

1778:

Joy disproved that in the comment just above yours. The company named for Walt Disney and Walt Disney as a historical figure share the name and should share the disamb primary page.

782:. While there are other Disneys, Walt Disney is clearly the most famous, and he is more famous for creating a fictional universe and founding a company than as a private person. 1019:

so automatically assuming someone searching "Disney" is looking for the company when they could be looking for the studio or individual is a bad precedent to maintain.

549: 710: 1201:. By contrast, an article can use "Disney" to refer to the company without ever mentioning the full name "The Walt Disney Company". In fact, there are presently 2833: 1711:

show a significant lead for "Disney" (excluding references of "Walt Disney") and "Walt Disney" (which probably includes references to the company's full name).

2838: 1574:

Sorry for the extra use of grep, it's just a speed optimization, as it seems to be 6x faster for me in this environment than just checking $ 1 with this awk.

2330:

Because as I explained above, New York City and New York state are widely referred to as simply "New York", without ever mentioning their extended forms.

2808: 97: 945:– Follows on the RM that failed to move the main company to Disney. There is no primary topic although the company and the person may be likely. see 2813: 1308: 249: 2818: 1757:. The Walt Disney Company is the primary topic for "Disney" nowadays. It's even better known than Walt Disney himself who founded the company. 1571:% grep -P '^'The_Walt_Disney_Company'\t' clickstream-enwiki-2023-12.tsv %7C awk '$ 2 ~ /^(Walt_)?Disney/ { c++; t += $ 4 } END { print c, t }' 2828: 1730:, and while we're at it, we might in turn want to consider sprinkling in a few ads or sponsored products to monetize all those views. :) -- 93: 78: 58: 915:

After much-extended time for discussion, there is a clear absence of consensus for the proposed move, and more like a consensus against.

902:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

694:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

507:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

596:. There's some claim that Disney could be a mononymous reference to Walt Disney, but the company eclipses that usage in every aspect. 240: 220: 2663: 2616: 2238: 2157: 2084: 1422: 1374: 1312: 1068:

least, and arguably much more, long-term historical significance as the company and deserves equal billing under the name 'Disney'.

181: 292:

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

2731: 1390:

I don't think this is a good example that it's the "same" outside of editing, because these phrases are particularly affected by

824: 336: 322: 1242:

synonymous for the average reader, which in itself means that there's a clear ambiguity between the person and their company. --

2460:

The festival is clearly the primary topic and should be moved to just Coachella. I'll likely start an RM once I have the time.

2306: 1442: 308: 180:

and its affiliated companies on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2759:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2199:(which redirects there) — but we shouldn't. Those PRIMARYREDIRECTs shouldn't point to disambiguation pages either. As for 880:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

544:– The term most commonly refers to either the company or the founder. I don't believe any of these are the primary topic. 1471: 1703:

doesn't show me anything related to the person for many pages, and the Knowledge Graph is that of the company, nor does

172: 136: 33: 847: 1555:

66 total identifiable outgoing clickstream destinations where the article name starts with "Disney" or "Walt Disney"

1530:

56 total identifiable outgoing clickstream destinations where the article name starts with "Disney" or "Walt Disney"

1505:

62 total identifiable outgoing clickstream destinations where the article name starts with "Disney" or "Walt Disney"

1905: 2648: 2570: 2544: 2481: 2451: 2423: 2380: 2362: 2321: 2281: 2255: 2172: 2100: 2034: 2016: 1149: 956: 893: 685: 657: 498: 1904:

I mentioned the broad-concept thing because I've seen that as an argument in terms of primariness: for example,

1645:

Per my statement in the previous move discussion. There's no primary topic between the company or Walt Disney.

1024: 83: 1085:"more, long-term historical significance as the company" The individual also influenced other companies. His 1061:'s place in western civilization and the shaping of the 20th century in entertainment, film, and the various 969:

no clear primary topic given other uses as well even though the company is likely to be the most common use.

2787: 2578: 2559: 2507: 2465: 2437: 2401: 2335: 2296: 2216: 2208: 2136: 2117: 2070: 2054: 1921: 1864: 1826: 1716: 1450: 1430: 1335: 1298: 1261: 1230: 1173: 1141: 978: 936: 768: 729: 567: 535: 474: 466: 458: 437: 405: 177: 21: 2527: 1947: 1878: 1856: 807: 760: 601: 2660: 2613: 2235: 2154: 2081: 1371: 903: 695: 667: 508: 39: 2499: 1992: 2727: 2719: 2703: 2540: 2477: 2447: 2419: 2415: 2376: 2358: 2317: 2277: 2251: 2096: 2058: 2030: 2012: 1988: 1783: 1625: 1612: 1350: 1320: 1188: 1073: 1063: 1043: 1002: 952: 866: 820: 759:

Nothing has changed since the above RM discussion from two years ago, the company is still the clear

643: 584: 369: 1467: 739: 2184: 2128: 1959:

the two linked discussions, in 2011 and 2020. The clickstream archive only starts in late 2017.) --

1136: 1020: 1015: 993: 949: 719: 698:

after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

361: 906:

after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

248:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2783: 2574: 2555: 2503: 2491: 2461: 2433: 2397: 2331: 2292: 2250:

If anything, Disney could be a DAB page (which I agree on) or become a redirect to the DAB page.

2212: 2132: 2113: 1984: 1822: 1712: 1633: 1446: 1426: 1331: 1294: 1257: 1226: 1169: 1118: 971: 764: 746: 563: 525: 432:

Actually, in my work on shortcutting links to the disambiguation page, I found that most uses of

2516:

It also had low participation, though I worry trying again so soon would come of as excessive. -

2502:, etc. The festival literally has six times the number of attendees than the city's population. 1936:, which attracted links referring to the city when the state was considered the primary topic. - 1859:-ish target. I might feel differently, though, if we find that a significant number of links to 1463: 1034: 400:

I think this move was misguided and worked out terribly. There are over 600 pages that link to

2746: 2519: 2204: 2168: 2109: 1939: 1870: 1675: 1650: 597: 562:

the company is clearly primary on both counts. This isn't a mononym like "Mozart" or "Stalin"

158: 1666:. The man himself was an important figure, no doubt, but when sources in 2024 talk of simply 1148:

is actually not relevant; a name can be too ambiguous as a title but at the same time be the

740:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:The_Walt_Disney_Company/Archive/2015#Requested_move_18_May_2015

2773: 2655: 2608: 2353: 2310: 2230: 2200: 2149: 2076: 2026: 1727: 1391: 1366: 925: 806:. There are definitely other Disneys, but the Disney company is clearly the primary topic. ( 623: 478: 1662:. The Walt Disney Company is clearly and unambiguously the primary topic for the bare name 1287: 841: 2723: 2698: 2276:

is a DAB, while the festival is the most common use! The same should apply to Disney too!

1996: 1779: 1608: 1475: 1346: 1316: 1184: 1103: 1097: 1069: 1039: 998: 862: 811: 639: 580: 1038:

Please note that Walt Disney's signature is used as the company's logo. For good reason.

416:

link refers to the person) as we find them. In short, I think it should be moved back. –

2167:

As you have been told many times, it's not just a matter of COMMONNAME. "Disney" is not

2474: 2000: 1109: 1086: 715: 634: 385: 373: 1699:

Perhaps Google Maps skews to the person, but have you looked at other search engines?

2802: 2679: 2638: 2004: 1980: 1964: 1895: 1841: 1770: 1735: 1704: 1690: 1629: 1593: 1585: 1399: 1276: 1247: 1114: 947:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:The_Walt_Disney_Company#Requested_move_11_December_2023

795: 742: 521: 462: 425: 393: 164: 148: 130: 2791: 2777: 2749: 2742: 2708: 2683: 2668: 2642: 2621: 2582: 2563: 2548: 2533: 2511: 2485: 2469: 2455: 2441: 2427: 2405: 2384: 2366: 2339: 2325: 2300: 2285: 2259: 2243: 2220: 2192: 2162: 2140: 2121: 2104: 2089: 2038: 2020: 1968: 1953: 1899: 1884: 1845: 1830: 1787: 1773: 1754: 1739: 1720: 1694: 1679: 1671: 1654: 1646: 1637: 1616: 1597: 1454: 1434: 1403: 1379: 1354: 1339: 1324: 1302: 1280: 1265: 1251: 1234: 1192: 1177: 1165: 1153: 1122: 1091: 1077: 1047: 1028: 1006: 984: 960: 946: 930: 870: 853: 828: 798: 772: 750: 723: 647: 628: 605: 588: 571: 553: 529: 481: 417: 245: 2652:

refers to the company (or, in a narrow enough context, one of its subsidiaries).

2272:

is a DAB. Disney should be a DAB, despite Disney being the most common use. Even

2769: 2372: 2066: 2008: 1918:

of them (back of the napkin, over 99%) meant to point to the television channel.

1911: 1360: 1058: 916: 614: 365: 837: 1307:

Just to get this straight, when you are talking of "Disney films" do you mean

666:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

389: 154: 1271:

turn to be navigated in a reasonably efficient way, is perfectly sensible. --

738:– Rename this to just Disney. Disney should not redirect to the company, see 392:

03:22, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) Seeing no opposition, I have performed this move. -

2411: 2273: 2176: 836:

the status quo is fine. No actual evidence presented in favor of a change.

232: 214: 1818: 1286:

looking for the person, you would type "Walt Disney". Just take a look at

2675: 2634: 2265: 2188: 2171:

enough, even though it should continue to redirect to the company as the

1960: 1933: 1891: 1837: 1814: 1758: 1731: 1700: 1686: 1589: 1395: 1272: 1243: 783: 2269: 2069:

in the lead paragraph, and in the hatnote, and links in the hatnote to

1927: 1363:

and against title policy. This really needs to come to an end, Randy.

477:

with some appropriate disambiguation header links added to that page?

2062: 1860: 1810: 1802: 1798: 1206: 1145: 470: 449:

It doesnt say how is Mike Disney related to the rest of the Disneys.

433: 413: 401: 381: 357: 332: 318: 304: 1624:

per InfiniteNexus, plus the article on the company serves as a good

1089:

series influenced imitators (copycats) with similar titles, such as

436:

should really refer to a specific subsidiary. Very few really meant

412:

task), or else make Disney a rd and deal with the problems (where a

70: 52: 2196: 2180: 1855:. I feel like the company's article makes for a decent of sort of 1161: 1157: 1033: 424:

Walt Disney Company is clearly, to me, the most dominant of uses.

1806: 1476:

page views for the primary redirect and the disambiguation page

2057:(due to a "local consensus" that is directly in conflict with 1290:

for "Disney" — how many of those are referring to the person?

281: 15: 364:, it seems reasonable that a significant minority would mean 1524:

The_Walt_Disney_Company Disney_(disambiguation) link 699

1499:

The_Walt_Disney_Company Disney_(disambiguation) link 587

1549:

The_Walt_Disney_Company Disney_(disambiguation) link 796

2782:

The RM has been closed, so no further !votes can be cast.

2571:

Talk:Coachella (festival)#Requested move 12 February 2024

2029:, the nominator of previous discussion also gets pinged. 2291:

stating the full corporate name. That's the difference.

2414:

has no primary topic by long-term significance but the

1930:, and they are always meant to link to the entertainer. 1558:

42213 total identifiable outgoing clickstreams to those

1533:

36132 total identifiable outgoing clickstreams to those

1508:

35313 total identifiable outgoing clickstreams to those

1210: 1202: 941: 734: 540: 88: 1588:

will make sure the average reader isn't astonished. --

1521:

The_Walt_Disney_Company Walt_Disney link 12688

1496:

The_Walt_Disney_Company Walt_Disney link 12358

1197:

I said you can't use "Disney" to refer to Walt Disney

96:, where you can join the project or contribute to the 1546:

The_Walt_Disney_Company Walt_Disney link 16696

1309:

the ones represented by this signature of Walt Disney

656:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

360:. Although those who type Disney most often mean the 1183:

continue contributing to society (couldn't resist).

244:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 176:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2061:and other principles, and really should just be at 1922:

Talk:Madonna/Archive 22#Requested move 18 July 2020

511:. No further edits should be made to this section. 670:. No further edits should be made to this section. 408:. We either should disambiguate all 600+ pages (a 2011:all those who participated in the previous move. 707:Consensus has not changed since the previous RM. 520:the page at this time, per the discussion below. 457:How about the company specific stuff merges into 372:, which actually produces the "Disney movies." -- 86:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can 238:This disambiguation page is within the scope of 170:This disambiguation page is within the scope of 76:This disambiguation page is within the scope of 2824:Disambig-Class Disney articles of NA-importance 2741:, I agree with  SMcCandlish and InfiniteNexus. 1801:point to the company or the person? What about 2316:be the primary topic for the word "New York". 1906:Talk:Nickelodeon/Archive 2#Move to Nickelodeon 1199:without mentioning his full name at least once 1483:Statistics snapshot for the last three months 8: 2475:I actually tried before, but it didn't work. 1567:The totals calculated with queries such as: 404:, and 99%+ would work just fine pointing to 1910:I have done many hundreds of DAB fixes for 82:, an attempt to structure and organize all 19: 2717: 892:The following is a closed discussion of a 684:The following is a closed discussion of a 497:The following is a closed discussion of a 209: 125: 47: 92:attached to this talk page, or visit the 32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 2705: 376:05:04, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) I agree too. 211: 127: 49: 2393: 2389: 1925: 1909: 1445:has been notified of this discussion. 1425:has been notified of this discussion. 1728:to the topic that first comes to mind 1552:1180 views of Disney (disambiguation) 1527:1048 views of Disney (disambiguation) 546:2601:183:101:58D0:5D57:4B1C:A325:C74C 7: 2834:Disambig-Class Anthroponymy articles 2446:Moved to what, and outcome of what? 1502:955 views of Disney (disambiguation) 911:The result of the move request was: 703:The result of the move request was: 579:. The company is the primary topic. 516:The result of the move request was: 106:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation 2839:NA-importance Anthroponymy articles 1926:I frequently disambiguate links to 1472:meta:Research:Knowledge clickstream 1468:WikiNav for the disambiguation page 1311:or the films made under the banner 1217:(which should really be changed to 109:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation 38:It is of interest to the following 861:. Very clear primary redirect. -- 258:Knowledge:WikiProject Anthroponymy 14: 2211:and is thus out of the question. 261:Template:WikiProject Anthroponymy 2809:WikiProject Disambiguation pages 2755:The discussion above is closed. 1209:to refer to the company, versus 876:The discussion above is closed. 285: 231: 213: 157: 147: 129: 69: 51: 20: 2418:is the primary topic by usage. 2392:is the literal definition of a 677:Requested move 26 November 2021 461:, the family stuff merges into 2814:Disambig-Class Disney articles 2307:August 2016, it was discovered 1221:if referring to the person or 885:Requested move 24 January 2024 711:closed by non-admin page mover 1: 2819:NA-importance Disney articles 2750:17:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 2684:15:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 2669:07:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 2653: 2622:07:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 2606: 2583:23:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2564:23:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2549:23:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2534:22:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2512:22:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2486:22:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2470:22:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2456:22:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2442:22:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2428:22:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2406:22:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2385:21:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2367:21:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2340:22:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2326:22:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2301:22:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2286:21:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2260:21:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2244:07:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 2228: 2221:20:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC) 2191:(which redirects there), and 2147: 2074: 1380:07:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 1364: 1313:of this Walt Disney signature 1225:if referring to his company. 931:02:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 854:17:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC) 829:02:16, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 799:01:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC) 773:17:53, 26 November 2021 (UTC) 751:11:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC) 252:and see a list of open tasks. 184:and see a list of open tasks. 2709:04:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2643:11:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2163:09:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2141:01:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2122:01:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2105:00:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2090:00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 2073:. This is more than enough. 2039:23:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 2021:23:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC) 1969:06:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 1954:00:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 1900:22:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 1885:15:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 1846:05:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 1831:18:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1788:11:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1774:10:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1740:05:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 1721:18:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1695:09:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC) 1680:10:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC) 1655:08:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 1638:15:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 1617:15:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC) 1598:08:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1455:20:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 1435:20:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 1404:11:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC) 1355:11:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 1340:01:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 1325:01:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 1303:01:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC) 1288:the most recent news results 1281:17:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1266:16:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1252:08:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1235:16:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1193:00:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1178:20:16, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 1123:00:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1078:12:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC) 1048:00:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC) 1029:17:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 1007:17:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 985:16:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 961:10:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 871:14:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC) 724:12:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC) 190:Knowledge:WikiProject Disney 2829:WikiProject Disney articles 2432:That page should be moved. 1863:were not meant to point to 490:Requested move 20 June 2018 428:05:08, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 246:the study of people's names 193:Template:WikiProject Disney 2855: 482:21:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 396:12:10, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC) 79:WikiProject Disambiguation 2792:17:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 2778:17:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 2649:argument from incredulity 2390:Being the most common use 2183:(which redirects there), 1164:should still redirect to 648:02:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC) 629:11:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC) 606:23:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC) 589:15:22, 20 June 2018 (UTC) 572:13:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC) 554:10:51, 20 June 2018 (UTC) 530:20:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 420:June 30, 2005 02:46 (UTC) 226: 142: 64: 46: 2757:Please do not modify it. 2573:, for those interested. 1569: 1392:what first comes to mind 899:Please do not modify it. 878:Please do not modify it. 691:Please do not modify it. 663:Please do not modify it. 504:Please do not modify it. 241:WikiProject Anthroponymy 2410:Another thing to tell, 2375:himself or the person! 2209:The Walt Disney Company 2175:. We could easily move 2071:Disney (disambiguation) 2055:The Walt Disney Company 1865:The Walt Disney Company 1156:should not be moved to 1142:The Walt Disney Company 1135:Although arguments for 937:Disney (disambiguation) 730:Disney (disambiguation) 536:Disney (disambiguation) 475:The Walt Disney Company 467:Disney (disambiguation) 465:, the rest is moved to 459:The Walt Disney Company 438:The Walt Disney Company 406:The Walt Disney Company 317:, 26 November 2021, to 178:The Walt Disney Company 112:Disambiguation articles 2371:And most importantly! 2207:and more awkward than 1050: 331:, 24 January 2024, to 1916:overwhelming majority 1726:should point readers 1701:Regular Google Search 1543:10002 views of Disney 1037: 518:consensus not to move 264:Anthroponymy articles 1518:9444 views of Disney 1493:9270 views of Disney 1464:WikiNav for the TWDC 370:Walt Disney Pictures 2500:year-long pageviews 2203:, that is far less 2185:Stanford University 384:. For the reasons 362:Walt Disney Company 303:, 20 June 2018, to 30:disambiguation page 2173:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT 1423:WikiProject Disney 1150:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT 1051: 173:WikiProject Disney 34:content assessment 2735: 2722:comment added by 2523: 2311:state of New York 2131:, SMcCandlish... 1943: 1874: 1563:Methodology notes 1457: 1437: 1064:Walt Disney Shows 714: 528: 473:is redirected to 345: 344: 280: 279: 276: 275: 272: 271: 208: 207: 204: 203: 124: 123: 120: 119: 2846: 2667: 2620: 2521: 2242: 2201:Disney (company) 2161: 2088: 1941: 1872: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1630:feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 1443:WikiProject Film 1440: 1420: 1378: 1224: 1220: 1216: 981: 974: 944: 923: 901: 850: 844: 792: 789: 786: 737: 708: 693: 665: 621: 543: 524: 506: 289: 288: 282: 266: 265: 262: 259: 256: 235: 228: 227: 217: 210: 198: 197: 194: 191: 188: 167: 162: 161: 151: 144: 143: 133: 126: 114: 113: 110: 107: 104: 91: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 25: 24: 16: 2854: 2853: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2799: 2798: 2761: 2760: 2707: 2647:That's blatant 2541:GabrielPenn4223 2478:GabrielPenn4223 2448:GabrielPenn4223 2420:GabrielPenn4223 2377:GabrielPenn4223 2359:GabrielPenn4223 2318:GabrielPenn4223 2278:GabrielPenn4223 2252:GabrielPenn4223 2097:GabrielPenn4223 2048:The company is 2031:GabrielPenn4223 2013:GabrielPenn4223 1989:GalaxyFighter55 1857:WP:BROADCONCEPT 1765: 1762: 1759: 1576: 1575: 1573: 1572: 1484: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1104:Happy Harmonies 1098:Merrie Melodies 992:. Concur that 979: 972: 953:GabrielPenn4223 940: 917: 897: 887: 882: 881: 848: 842: 808:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 790: 787: 784: 761:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 733: 689: 679: 674: 661: 615: 613:per the above. 539: 502: 492: 455: 447: 350: 286: 263: 260: 257: 254: 253: 196:Disney articles 195: 192: 189: 186: 185: 163: 156: 111: 108: 105: 102: 101: 87: 12: 11: 5: 2852: 2850: 2842: 2841: 2836: 2831: 2826: 2821: 2816: 2811: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2736: 2711: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2268:is a DAB, and 2262: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2051: 2050:overwhelmingly 2043: 2042: 2041: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1657: 1640: 1619: 1601: 1600: 1581: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1459: 1458: 1438: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1211:a mere 82 uses 1205:of an unpiped 1200: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1110:Swing Symphony 1087:Silly Symphony 1032: 1031: 1021:Trailblazer101 1012:Strong support 1009: 987: 934: 909: 908: 894:requested move 888: 886: 883: 875: 874: 873: 856: 831: 801: 776: 775: 727: 701: 700: 686:requested move 680: 678: 675: 673: 672: 658:requested move 652: 651: 650: 631: 608: 591: 574: 533: 514: 513: 499:requested move 493: 491: 488: 486: 454: 451: 446: 443: 442: 441: 422: 421: 349: 346: 343: 342: 341: 340: 326: 312: 290: 278: 277: 274: 273: 270: 269: 267: 250:the discussion 236: 224: 223: 218: 206: 205: 202: 201: 199: 182:the discussion 169: 168: 152: 140: 139: 134: 122: 121: 118: 117: 115: 103:Disambiguation 84:disambiguation 74: 62: 61: 59:Disambiguation 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2851: 2840: 2837: 2835: 2832: 2830: 2827: 2825: 2822: 2820: 2817: 2815: 2812: 2810: 2807: 2806: 2804: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2784:InfiniteNexus 2781: 2780: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2704: 2702: 2701: 2696: 2695:Strong oppose 2693: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2665: 2662: 2659: 2658: 2650: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2631: 2623: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2611: 2604: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2575:InfiniteNexus 2572: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556:InfiniteNexus 2552: 2551: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2529: 2525: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2504:InfiniteNexus 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2462:InfiniteNexus 2459: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2434:InfiniteNexus 2431: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398:InfiniteNexus 2395: 2394:primary topic 2391: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2355: 2351: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2332:InfiniteNexus 2329: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2293:InfiniteNexus 2289: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2240: 2237: 2234: 2233: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2213:InfiniteNexus 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2159: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2133:InfiniteNexus 2130: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114:InfiniteNexus 2111: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059:WP:COMMONNAME 2056: 2049: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1985:320th Century 1982: 1978: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1949: 1945: 1935: 1931: 1929: 1923: 1919: 1917: 1913: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1880: 1876: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823:InfiniteNexus 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1756: 1752: 1749: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713:InfiniteNexus 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1660:Strong oppose 1658: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1626:WP:CONCEPTDAB 1623: 1620: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586:MOS:DABCOMMON 1582: 1578: 1577: 1568: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1477: 1474:archives and 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1447:InfiniteNexus 1444: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427:InfiniteNexus 1424: 1419: 1418: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1381: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1332:InfiniteNexus 1328: 1327: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295:InfiniteNexus 1292: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258:InfiniteNexus 1255: 1254: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1227:InfiniteNexus 1212: 1208: 1204: 1198: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170:InfiniteNexus 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1106: 1105: 1100: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1066: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1004: 1000: 995: 991: 988: 986: 982: 976: 975: 973:Crouch, Swale 968: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 954: 951: 948: 943: 938: 933: 932: 929: 928: 924: 922: 921: 914: 907: 905: 900: 895: 890: 889: 884: 879: 872: 868: 864: 860: 857: 855: 851: 845: 839: 835: 832: 830: 826: 825:contributions 822: 818: 817: 815: 809: 805: 804:Strong oppose 802: 800: 797: 793: 781: 778: 777: 774: 770: 766: 765:InfiniteNexus 762: 758: 755: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 741: 736: 731: 726: 725: 721: 717: 712: 706: 699: 697: 692: 687: 682: 681: 676: 671: 669: 664: 659: 654: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 636: 632: 630: 627: 626: 622: 620: 619: 612: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 592: 590: 586: 582: 578: 575: 573: 569: 565: 564:In ictu oculi 561: 558: 557: 556: 555: 551: 547: 542: 537: 532: 531: 527: 523: 519: 512: 510: 505: 500: 495: 494: 489: 487: 484: 483: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463:Disney family 460: 452: 450: 444: 439: 435: 431: 430: 429: 427: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398: 397: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 347: 338: 334: 330: 327: 324: 320: 316: 313: 310: 306: 302: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295:Discussions: 291: 284: 283: 268: 251: 247: 243: 242: 237: 234: 230: 229: 225: 222: 219: 216: 212: 200: 183: 179: 175: 174: 166: 165:Disney portal 160: 155: 153: 150: 146: 145: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 116: 99: 95: 90: 89:edit the page 85: 81: 80: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 31: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2764: 2756: 2738: 2718:— Preceding 2713: 2699: 2694: 2656: 2609: 2518: 2517: 2313: 2231: 2193:Barack Obama 2150: 2077: 2045: 1993:IceWalrus236 1938: 1937: 1932:). See also 1915: 1869: 1868: 1852: 1794: 1755:User:Amakuru 1750: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1642: 1621: 1607:per nom. -- 1604: 1566: 1367: 1166:Barack Obama 1154:Barack Obama 1137:WP:NOPRIMARY 1130: 1129: 1108: 1102: 1096: 1092:Looney Tunes 1090: 1082: 1062: 1054: 1016:WP:NOPRIMARY 1011: 994:WP:NOPRIMARY 989: 970: 967:Weak support 966: 950:WP:NOPRIMARY 935: 926: 919: 918: 912: 910: 898: 891: 877: 858: 833: 813: 812: 803: 779: 756: 728: 704: 702: 690: 683: 662: 655: 633: 624: 617: 616: 610: 598:Nohomersryan 593: 576: 559: 534: 517: 515: 503: 496: 485: 456: 448: 423: 409: 377: 353: 351: 328: 314: 300: 294: 293: 255:Anthroponymy 239: 221:Anthroponymy 171: 94:project page 77: 40:WikiProjects 29: 2706:blaze__wolf 2657:SMcCandlish 2610:SMcCandlish 2492:WP:TITLEPTM 2373:Walt Disney 2354:SMcCandlish 2232:SMcCandlish 2151:SMcCandlish 2078:SMcCandlish 2067:Walt Disney 2027:SMcCandlish 1912:Nickelodeon 1705:Google News 1368:SMcCandlish 1361:MOS:SIGCAPS 1059:Walt Disney 904:move review 696:move review 668:move review 509:move review 479:Ewlyahoocom 366:Walt Disney 2803:Categories 2724:Jessintime 2700:Blaze Wolf 2522:RAINULATOR 2264:You know, 2205:WP:NATURAL 2169:WP:PRECISE 2110:WP:NATURAL 1997:Blaze Wolf 1942:RAINULATOR 1914:, and the 1873:RAINULATOR 1780:Randy Kryn 1609:Necrothesp 1347:Randy Kryn 1317:Randy Kryn 1203:3,753 uses 1185:Randy Kryn 1070:Randy Kryn 1040:Randy Kryn 999:Coolcaesar 913:not moved. 863:Necrothesp 705:not moved. 640:Hairy Dude 581:Rreagan007 337:discussion 323:discussion 309:discussion 98:discussion 2412:Coachella 2274:Coachella 2177:Las Vegas 2129:Let it go 2001:Waylon111 1979:Pinging @ 1293:as well. 840:(powera, 716:Lennart97 453:Merge to? 386:Plainsong 374:Plainsong 352:I agree. 329:Not moved 315:Not moved 301:Not moved 2732:contribs 2720:unsigned 2416:festival 2266:New York 2189:Stanford 2005:WiinterU 1981:162 etc. 1934:New York 1815:Chrysler 1513:November 1488:December 1115:Dimadick 743:Aalaa324 522:Dekimasu 426:Cburnett 394:UtherSRG 348:Comments 2314:cannot 2305:And in 2270:Mercury 2046:Oppose. 1928:Madonna 1795:Comment 1672:Amakuru 1647:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ 1643:Support 1605:Support 1538:October 1470:, from 1083:Comment 1055:Support 990:Support 635:WP:SNOW 418:Quadell 2770:Jorahm 2765:Oppose 2739:Oppose 2714:Oppose 2496:ngrams 2063:Disney 2009:Jorahm 1920:) and 1861:Disney 1853:Oppose 1819:Nestlé 1811:Forbes 1803:Armani 1799:Chanel 1751:Oppose 1709:Ngrams 1668:Disney 1664:Disney 1622:Oppose 1441:Note: 1421:Note: 1345:name. 1207:Disney 1160:, but 1146:Disney 1133:oppose 1107:, and 942:Disney 920:BD2412 859:Oppose 838:User:力 834:Oppose 814:cheeze 810:). - 780:Oppose 757:Oppose 735:Disney 618:bd2412 611:Oppose 594:Oppose 577:Oppose 560:Oppose 541:Disney 471:Disney 469:, and 434:Disney 414:Disney 402:Disney 388:said. 382:Disney 358:Disney 335:, see 333:Disney 321:, see 319:Disney 307:, see 305:Disney 187:Disney 137:Disney 36:scale. 2747:wiser 2743:older 2197:Obama 2181:Vegas 2007:and @ 1797:Does 1162:Obama 1158:Obama 390:Remes 28:This 2788:talk 2774:talk 2728:talk 2680:talk 2639:talk 2579:talk 2560:talk 2545:talk 2528:TALK 2508:talk 2482:talk 2466:talk 2452:talk 2438:talk 2424:talk 2402:talk 2381:talk 2363:talk 2336:talk 2322:talk 2309:the 2297:talk 2282:talk 2256:talk 2217:talk 2137:talk 2118:talk 2101:talk 2035:talk 2017:talk 1965:talk 1948:TALK 1896:talk 1879:TALK 1842:talk 1827:talk 1807:Dell 1784:talk 1771:Talk 1753:per 1736:talk 1717:talk 1691:talk 1676:talk 1634:talk 1613:talk 1594:talk 1451:talk 1431:talk 1400:talk 1351:talk 1336:talk 1321:talk 1299:talk 1277:talk 1262:talk 1248:talk 1231:talk 1189:talk 1174:talk 1131:Weak 1119:talk 1074:talk 1044:talk 1025:talk 1014:per 1003:talk 980:talk 957:talk 867:talk 821:talk 816:jack 796:Talk 769:talk 747:talk 720:talk 644:talk 602:talk 585:talk 568:talk 550:talk 445:Mike 410:huge 378:Move 354:Move 2676:Joy 2666:😼 2635:Joy 2619:😼 2241:😼 2195:to 2187:to 2179:to 2160:😼 2087:😼 1999:, @ 1991:, @ 1987:, @ 1983:, @ 1961:Joy 1892:Joy 1867:. - 1838:Joy 1732:Joy 1687:Joy 1590:Joy 1396:Joy 1377:😼 1273:Joy 1244:Joy 1213:of 1144:to 983:) 660:. 380:to 368:or 356:to 2805:: 2790:) 2776:) 2745:≠ 2734:) 2730:• 2682:) 2654:— 2641:) 2633:-- 2607:— 2581:) 2562:) 2547:) 2510:) 2498:, 2494:, 2484:) 2468:) 2454:) 2440:) 2426:) 2404:) 2396:. 2383:) 2365:) 2338:) 2324:) 2299:) 2284:) 2258:) 2229:— 2219:) 2148:— 2139:) 2120:) 2112:. 2103:) 2075:— 2037:) 2019:) 1967:) 1898:) 1890:-- 1844:) 1836:-- 1829:) 1821:? 1817:? 1813:? 1809:? 1805:? 1786:) 1769:| 1738:) 1719:) 1707:. 1693:) 1678:) 1653:) 1636:) 1628:. 1615:) 1596:) 1466:, 1453:) 1433:) 1402:) 1365:— 1353:) 1338:) 1323:) 1315:? 1301:) 1279:) 1264:) 1250:) 1233:) 1191:) 1176:) 1168:. 1152:. 1121:) 1113:. 1101:, 1095:, 1076:) 1057:. 1046:) 1027:) 1005:) 959:) 939:→ 896:. 869:) 852:) 846:, 827:- 823:| 819:| 794:| 771:) 763:. 749:) 732:→ 722:) 688:. 646:) 604:) 587:) 570:) 552:) 538:→ 526:よ! 501:. 2786:( 2772:( 2726:( 2678:( 2664:¢ 2661:☏ 2637:( 2617:¢ 2614:☏ 2577:( 2558:( 2543:( 2530:) 2526:( 2524:9 2520:B 2506:( 2480:( 2464:( 2450:( 2436:( 2422:( 2400:( 2379:( 2361:( 2352:@ 2334:( 2320:( 2295:( 2280:( 2254:( 2239:¢ 2236:☏ 2215:( 2158:¢ 2155:☏ 2135:( 2116:( 2099:( 2085:¢ 2082:☏ 2033:( 2025:@ 2015:( 2003:@ 1995:@ 1963:( 1950:) 1946:( 1944:9 1940:B 1924:( 1908:( 1894:( 1881:) 1877:( 1875:9 1871:B 1840:( 1825:( 1782:( 1766:P 1763:I 1760:J 1734:( 1715:( 1689:( 1674:( 1651:ᴛ 1649:( 1632:( 1611:( 1592:( 1478:. 1449:( 1429:( 1398:( 1375:¢ 1372:☏ 1349:( 1334:( 1319:( 1297:( 1275:( 1260:( 1246:( 1229:( 1223:] 1219:] 1215:] 1187:( 1172:( 1117:( 1072:( 1042:( 1023:( 1001:( 977:( 955:( 927:T 865:( 849:ν 843:π 791:P 788:I 785:J 767:( 745:( 718:( 713:) 709:( 642:( 625:T 600:( 583:( 566:( 548:( 339:. 325:. 311:. 100:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index