Knowledge

Talk:French wine

Source đź“ť

1183:
vine. But it's hardly a prominent grape. It was simply a way of echoing Agne27's "to-do"-list. You can call it "other regions" or you can make a level 2 heading for all of them. I'm not trying to be in the make an upscale anything. Regarding the Trend-discussion, we should move it to the history-section as "recent history" or something. And if we decide to keep it, we should keep an eye on it, as it's an area open to change (obviously). And if someone's read the newest rant from some critic (and someone will), they might want to put that in there. Reminds me of a line once written on Chateau Petrus, that Parker now found Penfold's Grange to be a superiour wine.--
827:
often accompanies with a promotion of some other type of wine. There are also written in an extremely sweeping assumptive language as if the editor knows what a large population wants or needs. The more I delve into this, the more I assume a vested interest by the editor(s) involved. It seems that there are few editors present in Knowledge that care enough about French wine to promote an unbiased viewpoint, so it seems these edits have been allowed to infiltrate almost every level. I appeal to the editor(s) in question to define their motivation to further a pretty bald bias. --
355: 185: 158: 1290: 285: 74: 53: 84: 22: 1769:
Spain) and competes with Italy for the position of having the world's largest wine production. The history of French wine goes back to the 6th century BCE, with many of France's regions dating their wine-making history to Roman times. The wines produced today range from expensive high-end wines sold internationally, to more modest wines usually only seen within France.
195: 2023:
quality and moderation now, and buy 750ml bottles, as people are going away from Soda, they redevelop the taste and pleasure of wines, after some time, a good idea is moving to drinking water after leaving sugar-filled soda drinks, and then to wine, and see the results on their skin appearance, weight and drinking pleasure. --
1781:
producers have benefited in recent years from the increased demand and prices for some of the prestige wines from Burgundy and Bordeaux, the French wine industry as a whole has suffered from a decline in domestic consumption as well as growing competition from both the New World and other European countries.
1369:.. does not, in this context, mean "at the estate", but "at the cooperative". In a few cases the grapes will be vinified separately and the wine bottled under the name of the grower's 'chateau', but most growers simply sell their grapes to the cooperative (getting paid by quantity and sugar content). 2045:
ONIVINS doesn't exist anymore. This governlment agency has been merged with others to form, first, VINIFLHOR, then FranceAgriMer. It has never been an association of vintners, but a government agency, whose mission is to control the application of French laws about vineyard planting and quality, to
1942:
I'm growing pretty tired of the obvious vandalism that permeates all the France-related articles. If you tiresome, whining Americans don't have something better to do than to vandalise wikipedian pages please just sod off! I removed the links, because both of them was very critical towards the French
1780:
France is the source of many grape varieties (such as Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Sauvignon Blanc and Syrah) that are now planted throughout the world, as well as several wine-making practices and styles of wine that are copied and imitated in other producing countries. Although some
1583:
problem is touched upon in your original assessment. Tomas e doesn't agree with this "selection" where we (you and I) emphazises a small group of regions and, well neglects the rest. To me, emphazising the big six makes sense. It doesn't make sense to equalize all regions in, say USA, then why should
1234:
I was thinking about the referencing of the page. I'm looking into a rewrite of the "big 6+" section to expand them slightly, and came to think of the referencing of those sections. How do we reference on summaries that are throughly referenced in their proper articles? Do I find new (my own) sources
972:
article already. But I agree with your assessment that the lead needs some reworking. While it should include a brief summary of history about France's first vineyards and monumental events like phylloxera, at the bare minimum the lead should include comments on where France ranks in world production
826:
It is my view that much of French wine is infected with a negative POV. There is much talk of the problems facing French wine here and elsewhere which are very real and germane. However, not only are the problems listed in a much larger volume compared to any other type of information, but they are
769:
BTW- tasters at The St. Catharines Wine Tasting of 2005 were all Canadian and included writers for Canadian wine magazines, professors and students at the local University, and 8 members of the Ontario wine industry(!). Nothing against Canadian wine, but this trumpeting of the results of this (minor)
1818:
OK, well that's one vote! I'll swap them over and people can always add in any small points that they feel are missing (for example it doesn't tackle the food issue). Other than that I think it's got about the right level of introductory detail - more info is there in the main part of the article of
1726:
I note the article as a whole is already the topic of some discussion, but particularly with some recent changes, the lead is getting very unwieldy (I note someone's just tagged it as too long) and also probably a little too exuberant in saying how great French wine is and in making generalisations,
1421:
Hectoliter is the standard measure for larger quantities of wine. Almost all wine statistics is reported in hl (rather than liter or m), so it's the unit that facilitates comparison across countries and sources. Feel free to add the same figure in additional measures (the number of bottles have been
811:
Having browsed around the French Wine entries in Knowledge, I have to say that in general, the representation of French wine here is in a shambles. Far from wishing only to complain, I plan on adding what I can. There's certainly a lot to be done. Is anyone else interested in rallying a concerted
792:
for example, although those figures are from 1998 and show Italy just slightly ahead and Italian production decining faster than French. I've heard mentioned that France produces the most 'quality' wine in the world, whatever that means, presumably wine over a certain base price threshold. Maybe the
1774:
Two concepts central to higher end French wines are the notion of “terroir”, which links the style of the wines to the specific locations where the grapes are grown and the wine is made, and the Appellation d'Origine Contrôlée (AOC) system. Appellation rules closely define which grape varieties and
1463:
This paragraph in "Trends" is highly misleading:  "The result has been a continuing wine glut, often called the wine lake. This has led to the distillation of wine into industrial alcohol as well as a government program to pay farmers to pull up their grape vines through vine pull schemes. A large
1219:
I've made some edits, added a few sources and a picture et al. - However, I think the article lacks some technical data, such as amount of wine produced, area under vines and so on and so forth. Is there some tempelate we can borrow from somewhere, that we can institute on more pages (italian wine,
1197:
Well, I don't really see the need for grouping the regions into "quality classes" in the overview article. The description of each region and the history section will make it obvious that Bordeaux has been traded for long, that Champagne is the world's most noted sparkling wine and so on. But we do
1182:
Then call it something else. I may be wrong, but I don't see any of those regions as particularily prominent. They have a history, repeat history, of producing bulk wine. Not wine of prominence. And while the regions may be large, that hardly constitutes prominence. Arien is the worlds most planted
1163:
that you can label Languedoc-Roussillon (by far the largest region, and arguably the one where most new things have happened over the last decade or two) and South-West (parts of which had a quality reputation centuries before Bordeaux) as "less prominent" without being very POV. To me, that's more
993:
My geography is a bit sketchy, but I seem to remember that Paris is somewhere inland on the Seine. However, I was surprised to see on the wine map that it is now a huge island off the West coast of France. On a serious note it seems unnecessary as Paris doesn't itself produce wine that the 'island'
1768:
French wine is produced in several regions throughout France on over 800,000 hectares (over 2 million acres) of vineyards. In a typical year between 50 and 60 million hectolitres of wine is produced, or some 7 to 8 billion bottles. France has the world's second-largest total vineyard area (behind
1562:
The only significant section that I think is missing is something commenting on the role of wine in French culture. This is touched upon in the lead but there is no where else in the article where it is given more extensive treatment. It would be a tricky section to write, and one that needs rock
1540:
is a tricky part. With the short 1-3 line sections, it looks pretty bad. But at the same time, this is a section that could easily overwhelm the article. I mentioned in my Feb assessment that I think the "Big Six" should have at least a strong paragraph worth of content and I still think that is
1405:
I'm an American, which is apparently a dangerous thing to be on this page, but I notice that the production estimates are 50-60 million hectoliters. To me, this would sound better as 5-6 gigaliters or 5-6 billion liters. 50-60 million hectoliters just sounds odd. Are hectoliters commonly used to
1140:
I've done some of the things listed (VdP, Wine regions), though a cleanup and expansion may be needed. Regarding the "trend" section: Is it really needed? Why not delete it all together? After all, from what I read, the "trend" is very alternating, sometimes prominent wine personalities declares
1118:
Good thoughts, although I think that if everything in the list was fixed, it would reasonably be a GA. The trends section could probably be split between the history section and a new "commercial aspects" section, but here more than for many other parts, extensive referencing is needed. Not just
2074:
Apparently, the French wine industry was saved by importing California vines that were resistant to Phylloxera , which is native to North America. The Wik article "Great French Wine Blight" (which does not have a French page)pretty much supports this, naming Texas as the source of the savior
2022:
Anyway, is the wine consumption decreasing in Latin Europe? That sounds misleading. In the past in here (northern portugal) people bought 5L wine bottles. In recent years, it is a whole world apart, it is trendy and healthier than drinking soda drinks filled with sugar, people search for better
1155:
Perhaps "trends" was a badly chosen term; what I meant was "developments of the last few decades" as distinct from "history over several centuries". Things like decreasing domestic consumption, increased new world competition, vineyard restructuring, improvement in southern France, branding and
1506:
section needs significant referencing and a little NPOV revision. My comments from Feb still have some relevance as much more content could be added. It may be worth to start the section off talking about the different styles (sparkling, fortified, etc) and then create a sub-header about grape
1584:
it be so in France. However Tomas e has a valid point. So unless we can reach some sort of agreement, I think we should go with the way it looks now. The "culture" thingy will be difficult, but I'll look into it. I'll cross out each paragraph as I finish (everyone is welcome to join in).--
1489:
The "summary" history section is a little disjointed and needs to be fleshed out a little more. It certainly doesn't need to include everything, especially now that we have a splinter history article, but it probably needs about 2 full paragraphs in order to give a broad overview of the
855:
I wonder about our current statistic that American importation of wine from France dropped 50% in 2003. I had previously read that this "boycott" was largely a fabrication of anti-French individuals like Bill O'Reilly and that there was little or no discernable impact on the
1675:
I must say that I'm surprised to see Sotheby having such a weak coverage of Languedoc-Roussillon and Sud-Ouest! To me, that seems like taking a bit outdated view on French wine. Other figures to consider could be production volume, economic volume, number of appellations...
1995:
This is the current caption to one of the photos in the article: "French wines are usually made to accompany food." It seems a rather sweeping (and fairly false) statement. Should it be changed? I think it should be changed. But I don't have the wikinerve to change it...
1727:
eg with phrases like "the world leader regarding not only quantity but also quality", "many other countries find inspiration in the french system", "French wine plays an important role in French identity and pride" etc. Plus isn't it standard for the lead to start "
866:
Negative POV, indeed: "...it's becoming increasingly difficult for French producers to compete internationally, and in traditional French fashion, they are beginning to surrender." Perhaps the article would be better off without this cheap crack at the French.
1339:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1464:
part of this glut is caused by the re-emergence of Languedoc wine." The wine glut existed 20 years ago and the wine pull-up scheme was dropped almost a decade ago. That the wine glut would be due to "the re-emergence of Languedoc wine" is simply false.
1440:
Thanks for the explanation, I didn't know that. In that case, I think it's fine. I suppose we could put "(~1.4 billion US gallons)" after the figure, but I don't think it's a requirement. It's just as hard to visualize 1.4B gallons as it is to visualize
1606:. As interesting as the wines of Jura and Savoie are, there is no balanced encyclopedic reason that they should be devoted equal space to Burgundy or the Loire Valley. I think our coverage should be on par with what is found in reliable sources like 837:
I agree. It is infected and attempts to promote some wines. This occurs in several articles. Are grape varieties that important for the consumer? In here the trend is the wine region followed by brand. And most wines mix different grape varieties.
1087:
Climate & Geography. Some type of summary about major features like rivers, Massif Central, Mistral winds etc and the varying influences of continental, maritime and Mediterranean climates. Brief summary on different soil types in the major
1075:
Wine styles. Currently it is merged into a grape variety section. Ideally this should probably be split out into its own section and go into some summary about the particular sparkling, fortified, botrytized wines. Maybe also a brief touch on
1249:
I'm looking to give this article another go. It seems to have stalled despite being the wine-drive on Wikiproject Wine. However, I'd like it if someone (Agne?) would review his list of 18 february 2008 (above). Nice to have a to-do-list. Any
1017:? :-) On a more serious note, the magnification of the Paris area, set to the left of the French mainland is obviously quite irrelevant to a map of French wine regions. I replaced it with another, much less cluttered and more stylized map. 1422:
calculated for the benefit of the general reader), but please do not change the basic figure, since it's actually quoted from the source given. I assume that the historical background is that most wine barrels are a couple of hl in size (
1406:
measure quanitites of wine? I know that hecto- and deca- don't get much love, but I propose changing the phrasing here. Anyway, I'm off to McDonald's to whine, sod-off, and look for France on the map of Asia on the back of the placemat.
1158:
By the way, I disagree strongly with your classification of several regions into a bunch of "less prominent regions". You could probably put Jura and Savoy under such a label because of their very limited production, but there is
895:
has been put up for deletion. A potential outcome could be a request to merge the relevant information into this article so any input (or improvements) that could be given from the editors of this article would be appreciated.
1426:= 225 l, for example), so it has stuck as the most convenient metric (if not basic SI) measure at winery level. Statistics for grapes harvest is usually in tonnes, while vineyards are in hectares (Europe) or acres (e.g. US). 1867:
I am going to rewrite this, giving a footnote for the two very important details that I am changing. If anyone thinks that I (and the website I cite) have got this wrong, by all means correct me and cite another source!
1763:
Further to the above I thought I'd post a proposed draft here rather than plonk it in the article immediately. Grateful for any thoughts - I've based it mostly on previous versions, but just stripped quite a bit out -
1384:
Well, the statement about what "au domaine" means is wrong as well, as far as I can say... But what this article really needs are not just corrected statements, but reliably sourced statements. Feel free to help...
1731:
is ..."? Currently it does more of less cover all the key points (as below), so I guess it just needs some copyediting and the removal of both some of the detail/wordiness and some of the broader generalisations -
892: 1123:
of the world's #1 wine country. IMHO, wine and food pairing is an even more difficult subject than description of wine flavours if you want to avoid POV. But perhaps there are better sources than I'm aware of.
973:(sort of like the current third paragraph but it is a little inaccurate since Italy surpasses Frances in some years) and a overview of the major wine regions as well as a brief touch on the concept of terroir. 1068:
Languedoc & Provence) should probably have at least a paragraph summary leading into their main articles. It is hard to truly be an overview of "French wine" without providing some summary about these
1541:
needed. Some of the smaller regions like Jura, Corsica and Southwest France should maybe grouped into a sub heading titled "Other regions". I'm also wondering if it is worthwhile to make another splinter
1053:
The history section is missing ALOT of important detail. It is not bad considering that until a few weeks ago, this article didn't have a history section at all. In the long run there problem should be a
1895:
Although it now says that bottled at the domaine means it was bottled where it was grown (or at a co-op), and means it is the product of a single vineyard - isn't that still a little restrictive? --
1471: 1702:
Regarding the "Wine in french culture"-part, wouldn't it be useful to get one from the France-project to look into that? Most of my material on Wine only deals with that subject superficially.
1736:
Production levels, history, prestige (and the fact that the main grape varieties are now planted throughout the world and the key styles are imitated and copied. Or over-imitated if you will)
1050:. While a lot of wine articles have the opposite problem of not having enough of a summary, this one actually has too much and several details that are not found in the rest of the article. 1336:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1775:
winemaking practices are allowed in each of France's several hundred geographically defined appellations, which can cover entire regions, individual villages or even specific vineyards.
1871:
The translation "domaine" = "field" was just a simple mistake: no need to cite a source for changing that, I think. No one can imagine that wines are bottled "at the field", surely.
1559:
section with its one line should either be eliminated or expanded. There is some benefit in keeping the content and expanding it to include some of the major regional organizations.
1141:
french wine "dead" or "struggeling" sometimes it's the latest craze and have been "reborn" and so on. I see a hornets nest that just begs for a lot of PoV and all that follows.--
293: 168: 1507:
varieties and their association with major region. If we have a reliable, updated source-maybe a listing of the top 10 grape varieties by plantings would be helpful as well.
1946:
So. That's what you call thinking? The most vandalized articles in this so called encyclopedia are American and it's done by whining Europeans which includes you British.
1936:"the typical French person drank local wine and, although proud of France's reputation for making some of the world's outstanding wines, knew relatively little about them" 1061:
There could be more details and summary about the Vin de Pays system, especially since those wines are developing more of an emerging presence on the world's wine market.
680: 847:
Dear BridgeBurner- Please see the message I left on your talk page several days ago. In the meantime, I'm workiing on a general wine competitions page. Best regards.
2178: 245: 953:. While the history is quite interesting, the first 9 lines of the article (in my browser) are only about history; they would belong better in a history section. 927: 1064:
Wine Regions-This area has certainly been improved in the last few weeks but I think the "Big 6" regions (Bordeaux, Loire, Burgundy, Alsace, Champagne, Rhone---
2183: 1841:
I'm the one who tagged the lead as too long. It's still on the long side, but more importantly, your version is much better in terms of neutrality. Thanks. ~
589: 1317:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with 221: 2173: 2163: 130: 1514:
section needs referencing. It could use some expansion but I'm wondering if that would be too much content. We may want to think about creating a
1314: 636:
Just about all of them! Any pictures of wine regions, grape varieties or wine would be useful. In particular we need wine region maps that can be
140: 1614:
where major regions are giving significantly more coverage than minor ones. Take for example Sotheby's with the breakdown of pages per regions.
1552:
section should probably be incorporated into the history section, at least as a sub-section. It also needs a good POV scrubbing and referencing.
1341: 1333: 1329: 1306: 2168: 707: 255: 2056: 1094:
section could do a little better summary than a few lines. It maybe best to merge it into the intro on the Wine region section as a segway.
1058:
article with this section serving as a summary. In the meantime though, a B class article would have a more well developed history section.
208: 163: 2003: 1976:
is omitted. I don't have access to the stats, but it's worth a better look, and the figures being dated, as they will evolve over time.
1745:
Recent issues (eg decline in domestic consumption, greater competition in world markets, split between the elite producers and the rest)
1345: 298: 1529:
section seems out of place. II t could be either expanded to a more full fledged section or maybe incorporated as a sub-section of the
2099: 2080: 1953: 1917: 1475: 106: 2158: 699: 2018:
why it seems false to you? to me it sounds quite trivial. But the article is written for a global audience, for instance Asians.
651: 570: 2098:
Whether it is due to changing tastes or some other factor(s), the addition of RS material on this would improve the article.
1883: 1072:
Trends section seems awfully OR. Ideally it should be referencing and merged into the history section as part of "Modern day"
684: 665: 1119:
because it could be OR, it's POV-prone territory where some edits may want to either engage in France-bashing or defend the
1961: 1749:
It should be possible to keep to a very brief neutral/factual paragraph on each, and leave it a manageable size overall? --
631: 1485:
This article has certainly improved significantly since I last reviewed it. Here are some thoughts on future improvement.
789: 637: 549: 456: 742: 2113:
That section has zero citations already, so any claims it makes are suspicious. Any citations at all would improve it. ~
2042:
The page says: L'Office national interprofessionnel des vins, abbreviated ONIVINS, is a French association of vintners.
1618: 1567: 1271: 1104: 977: 934: 448: 421: 377: 97: 58: 33: 1325: 1297: 386: 655: 646: 598: 405: 366: 316: 220:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1043:
Referencing. While not horrendous, there are a couple section and several important claims that need referencing.
746: 2140: 1374: 1355: 440: 2060: 949:
I'm quite unhappy with the way the article starts right now. This is an article on French wine, not about the
2007: 1957: 1563:
solid references, but if it could be done it would be a very educational and important part of the article.
669: 444: 413: 2103: 2084: 1921: 1879: 1055: 969: 788:
produced the most wine in the world, often in the context of it being underappreciated outside Italy! See
1542: 2119: 615: 39: 1515: 382: 857: 1999: 1981: 1949: 1913: 1545:
which could go more indepth about each regions and scrap this entire section in lieu a summary style.
1467: 1014: 878: 750: 1301:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
21: 2136: 1446: 1411: 1370: 1351: 1165: 999: 409: 401: 395: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2028: 1847: 1805: 1707: 1589: 1302: 1255: 1240: 1225: 1188: 1146: 554: 868: 1873: 1681: 1519: 1431: 1390: 1235:
or do I rely on the ones in the proper article (and don't source at all in theses segments)?--
1203: 1173: 1129: 1022: 958: 848: 828: 813: 354: 2114: 1900: 1824: 1790: 1754: 1621: 1570: 1274: 1107: 980: 937: 481: 1977: 1603: 1100:
Two MAJOR topics on the relationship of French wine to the culture and cuisine of France.
562: 477: 465: 1442: 1407: 1047: 995: 968:
I'm surprise there is not already a history section, heck I'm surprise we don't have a
771: 761: 607: 529: 435: 1289: 994:
can be removed from the map. If of course someone has moved Paris please ignore this.
741:
BTW- Our wine industry in Canada has been doing great in recent competitions. See the
184: 157: 2152: 2024: 1842: 1801: 1703: 1585: 1251: 1236: 1221: 1184: 1142: 839: 473: 469: 426: 89: 2046:
produce socio-economic data on grapevine sector and to support experimentations.
1677: 1427: 1386: 1318: 1199: 1169: 1125: 1018: 1010: 954: 623: 525: 521: 505: 489: 1896: 1820: 1786: 1750: 1615: 1564: 1268: 1101: 974: 931: 897: 619: 537: 497: 493: 200: 798: 603: 541: 517: 513: 430: 190: 79: 73: 52: 2135:
What about Bergerac? It's Knowledge entry says it's a wine-growing region.
284: 2076: 1498:
section needs some referencing but overall seems to cover the topic well.
794: 580: 558: 501: 576: 485: 1046:
The Lead section could use some editorial discretion in accordance to
194: 1931: 1077: 611: 509: 102: 1267:
Sure, I'll have some free time tomorrow and I'll take another look.
1037:
Here are some thoughts on ways to get this article up to a B class:
893:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Problems in the French Wine Industry
2144: 2124: 2107: 2088: 2064: 2032: 2011: 1985: 1925: 1904: 1889: 1852: 1828: 1809: 1794: 1758: 1711: 1685: 1623: 1593: 1572: 1479: 1450: 1435: 1415: 1394: 1378: 1359: 1276: 1259: 1244: 1229: 1207: 1192: 1177: 1150: 1133: 1109: 1026: 1003: 982: 962: 939: 900: 881: 871: 860: 831: 816: 812:
effort to make the entries on French Wine full and informative? --
801: 774: 764: 753: 785: 533: 217: 461: 213: 2050: 1973: 1081: 15: 2079:) has info from the Columbia Encyc. and a book on the blight. 1579:
Thanks Agne. I agree with most of your thoughts. However the
1288: 283: 1313:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1932:
I'm thinking about to start vandalising American pages...
1156:
changing labelling practices, more corporate influence...
715: 711: 703: 342: 337: 332: 327: 910:
This is an English-language entry so one should use
759:
Ottawa Wine Tasting of 2005 article has been deleted
212:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1344:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 1285:
Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-vigneron Thmb.jpg
266: 688: 296:, a project which is currently considered to be 1943:wine industry and is an ill disguised POV... 928:L'Office national interprofessionnel des vins 8: 888:Relevant French wine article up for deletion 1465: 1033:Thoughts on getting this article up to a B 590:Unreferenced biographies of living persons 311: 263: 152: 47: 1533:section since it is intimately connected. 770:tasting needs to be kept in perspective. 575:Cleanup lists of wine-related articles: 1198:need better sourcing for this article! 154: 49: 19: 2179:Low-importance Food and drink articles 2094:reasons for declining wine consumption 2077:http://arlindo-correia.com/060904.html 1472:2A01:CB04:110:C800:1CAD:92D0:15A9:C2BB 1334:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline 687:. Add to the Wikiquote page for wine: 1974:http://en.wikipedia.org/Petit_Manseng 1602:Well I think we should be mindful of 1531:Quality levels and appellation system 1496:Quality levels and appellation system 7: 1972:This is incomplete: for example the 1168:thinking than encyclopedic writing. 656:Nominations for top level importance 292:This article is within the scope of 230:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink 206:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 2184:WikiProject Food and drink articles 1220:american wine, german wine etc.)?-- 926:section is from the merged article 743:St. Catharines Wine Tasting of 2005 363:Here are some tasks you can do for 233:Template:WikiProject Food and drink 38:It is of interest to the following 1939:Why is this phrase in wikipedia ? 877:I've removed the biased vandalism. 14: 793:most wine in bottles rather than 1332:. Using one of the templates at 1098:Culture and Food pairing section 387:Great Wine Capitals of the World 353: 193: 183: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 2174:C-Class Food and drink articles 2164:High-importance France articles 1504:Wine styles and grape varieties 1459:Updated thoughts on improvement 250:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 2012:17:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC) 1658:Provence & Corsica-5 pages 1346:Media copyright questions page 666:Template:Infobox grape variety 1: 2065:11:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 1905:11:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 1890:18:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 1853:19:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1829:09:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1810:09:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1795:09:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC) 1612:Jancis Robinson's Wine Course 1451:00:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 1436:00:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC) 1416:23:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1315:boilerplate fair use template 1134:11:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 1110:01:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 1004:09:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 983:22:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 963:20:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 224:and see a list of open tasks. 109:and see a list of open tasks. 2169:All WikiProject France pages 2051:http://www.franceagrimer.fr/ 1926:12:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 1759:19:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 1712:12:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 1686:00:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC) 1624:23:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1594:20:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1573:19:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 1342:criteria for speedy deletion 1298:Image:Logo-vigneron Thmb.jpg 1277:17:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 1260:12:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) 1080:and wine based spirits like 940:03:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 901:20:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 802:19:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 775:20:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 765:20:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 698: 115:Knowledge:WikiProject France 1608:Sotheby's Wine Encyclopedia 1027:02:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 922:Some of the content in the 747:Ottawa Wine Tasting of 2005 118:Template:WikiProject France 2200: 2033:12:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 1395:16:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1379:13:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC) 1326:the image description page 861:10:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC) 832:18:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC) 256:project's importance scale 209:WikiProject Food and drink 141:project's importance scale 2145:18:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 2125:15:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 2108:04:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC) 2089:02:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC) 1649:Jura & Savoie-4 pages 1518:splinter, similar to the 1480:17:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC) 1360:13:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1328:and edit it to include a 1245:08:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 842:14:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC 817:19:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC) 784:I have always heard that 310: 291: 262: 249: 178: 134: 67: 46: 1986:13:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 1652:Southwest France-7 pages 1307:explanation or rationale 1230:16:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 1208:13:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 1193:12:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 1178:12:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 1151:09:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC) 882:18:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 872:13:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 754:15:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 441:wine serving temperature 2159:C-Class France articles 1962:14:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC) 945:Introduction of article 670:Template:Infobox winery 445:Western Australian wine 414:Western Australian wine 236:Food and drink articles 2131:Wine regions of France 1581:Wine regions of France 1538:Wine regions of France 1401:50 million hectoliters 1293: 1056:History of French wine 989:Paris in the Atlantic? 970:History of French wine 951:history of French wine 681:grape article template 288: 28:This article is rated 1309:as to why its use in 1292: 652:Operation stub-killer 616:Robert M. Parker, Jr. 287: 1863:Mis en bouteille ... 581:articles by category 449:Start class articles 1543:French wine regions 1424:Barrique bordelaise 807:Rallying the Troops 780:Largest production? 404:, particularly the 267:Related taskforces: 2075:vines. This page ( 1637:Champagne-15 pages 1512:Labeling practices 1330:fair use rationale 1294: 1166:upscale wine guide 555:Cabernet Sauvignon 289: 98:WikiProject France 34:content assessment 2123: 2002:comment added by 1952:comment added by 1916:comment added by 1851: 1655:Languedoc-8 pages 1634:Burgundy-34 pages 1631:Bordeaux-68 pages 1520:German wine label 1516:French wine label 1482: 1470:comment added by 1009:Well, there is a 734: 733: 730: 729: 726: 725: 722: 721: 697: 696: 383:Sebastiani family 315:WikiProject Wine 306: 305: 151: 150: 147: 146: 2191: 2117: 2055:A French reader 2014: 1964: 1928: 1888: 1886: 1876: 1845: 1800:Looks fine to me 1305:but there is no 918:Attribution note 482:Champagne (wine) 400:any of the ~700 367:WikiProject Wine 357: 349: 348: 312: 294:Wines task force 274: 264: 238: 237: 234: 231: 228: 203: 198: 197: 187: 180: 179: 174: 171: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 85: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2149: 2148: 2133: 2096: 2072: 2040: 1997: 1993: 1970: 1968:Grape Varieties 1947: 1934: 1911: 1884: 1874: 1872: 1865: 1724: 1640:Alsace-12 pages 1461: 1403: 1367: 1287: 1035: 1015:Paris, Atlantic 1013:, so why not a 991: 947: 920: 908: 890: 824: 809: 782: 739: 718: 693: 679:Comment on the 563:Sauvignon blanc 478:California wine 466:Australian wine 378:Article request 358: 347: 272: 235: 232: 229: 226: 225: 199: 192: 172: 166: 137:High-importance 121:France articles 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 83: 81: 62:High‑importance 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 2197: 2195: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2161: 2151: 2150: 2137:Paul Magnussen 2132: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2095: 2092: 2071: 2068: 2057:147.100.144.97 2039: 2036: 2020: 2019: 1992: 1989: 1969: 1966: 1933: 1930: 1908: 1907: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1813: 1812: 1783: 1782: 1777: 1776: 1771: 1770: 1747: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1646:Rhone-11 pages 1644: 1643:Loire-17 pages 1641: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1597: 1596: 1576: 1575: 1560: 1553: 1546: 1534: 1523: 1508: 1500: 1491: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1371:Philip Trueman 1366: 1365:à la propriété 1363: 1352:BetacommandBot 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1157: 1137: 1136: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1095: 1089: 1085: 1073: 1070: 1062: 1059: 1051: 1044: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 990: 987: 986: 985: 946: 943: 919: 916: 907: 904: 889: 886: 885: 884: 864: 863: 852: 851: 844: 843: 823: 820: 808: 805: 781: 778: 772:Steve.Moulding 762:Steve.Moulding 738: 735: 732: 731: 728: 727: 724: 723: 720: 719: 695: 694: 692: 691: 689:Wikiquote wine 673: 672: 659: 658: 642: 641: 640:for Knowledge. 627: 626: 608:Cabernet franc 594: 593: 585: 584: 566: 565: 550:Articles to FA 545: 544: 530:Sparkling wine 457:Articles to GA 452: 451: 436:Vitis vinifera 417: 416: 391: 390: 373: 360: 359: 352: 346: 345: 340: 335: 330: 324: 321: 320: 308: 307: 304: 303: 290: 280: 279: 277: 275: 269: 268: 260: 259: 252:Low-importance 248: 242: 241: 239: 227:Food and drink 222:the discussion 205: 204: 188: 176: 175: 173:Low‑importance 164:Food and drink 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2196: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2154: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2130: 2126: 2121: 2116: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2093: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2069: 2067: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2053: 2052: 2047: 2043: 2037: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2004:86.139.40.179 2001: 1991:Photo Caption 1990: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1967: 1965: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1944: 1940: 1937: 1929: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1869: 1862: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1779: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1721: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1561: 1558: 1557:Organizations 1554: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1539: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1499: 1497: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1458: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348:. Thank you. 1347: 1343: 1337: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1324:Please go to 1322: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1291: 1284: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1138: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1116: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 988: 984: 981: 978: 976: 971: 967: 966: 965: 964: 960: 956: 952: 944: 942: 941: 938: 935: 933: 929: 925: 924:Organizations 917: 915: 913: 905: 903: 902: 899: 894: 887: 883: 880: 876: 875: 874: 873: 870: 862: 859: 854: 853: 850: 846: 845: 841: 836: 835: 834: 833: 830: 821: 819: 818: 815: 806: 804: 803: 800: 796: 791: 787: 779: 777: 776: 773: 767: 766: 763: 760: 756: 755: 752: 748: 744: 736: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 690: 686: 685:grape infobox 682: 678: 675: 674: 671: 667: 664: 661: 660: 657: 653: 650: 648: 647:Collaboration 644: 643: 639: 635: 633: 632:Photo request 629: 628: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 602: 600: 596: 595: 592: 591: 587: 586: 582: 578: 574: 572: 568: 567: 564: 560: 556: 553: 551: 547: 546: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 474:Burgundy wine 471: 470:Bordeaux wine 467: 463: 460: 458: 454: 453: 450: 446: 442: 438: 437: 432: 428: 427:Canadian wine 425: 423: 419: 418: 415: 411: 410:miscellaneous 407: 403: 399: 397: 393: 392: 388: 384: 381: 379: 375: 374: 372: 370: 369: 368: 361: 356: 351: 350: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 329: 326: 325: 323: 322: 318: 314: 313: 309: 301: 300: 295: 286: 282: 281: 278: 276: 271: 270: 265: 261: 257: 253: 247: 244: 243: 240: 223: 219: 215: 211: 210: 202: 196: 191: 189: 186: 182: 181: 177: 170: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 90:France portal 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 2134: 2100:50.111.44.55 2097: 2081:64.53.191.77 2073: 2054: 2048: 2044: 2041: 2021: 1998:— Preceding 1994: 1971: 1954:50.32.45.168 1945: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1918:87.33.97.130 1909: 1878: 1870: 1866: 1784: 1762: 1748: 1742:Link to food 1728: 1725: 1611: 1607: 1580: 1556: 1549: 1537: 1530: 1526: 1511: 1503: 1495: 1493: 1484: 1466:— Preceding 1462: 1423: 1404: 1368: 1350: 1338: 1323: 1310: 1296: 1295: 1248: 1233: 1218: 1160: 1120: 1097: 1091: 1065: 1036: 1011:Paris, Texas 992: 950: 948: 923: 921: 911: 909: 891: 865: 849:David Justin 829:BridgeBurner 825: 814:BridgeBurner 810: 783: 768: 758: 757: 740: 676: 662: 645: 630: 624:Rioja (wine) 597: 588: 577:all articles 569: 548: 526:Spanish wine 522:Rioja (wine) 506:Italian wine 490:Dessert wine 455: 434: 420: 394: 376: 365: 364: 362: 297: 251: 207: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 2115:Anachronist 1948:—Preceding 1912:—Preceding 1739:Terroir/AOC 1729:French wine 1250:thoughts?-- 858:64.12.116.6 737:Canada wine 683:and on the 620:Pinot blanc 538:Tempranillo 498:German wine 494:French wine 201:Food portal 2153:Categories 2070:Phylloxera 1978:Richardhod 879:Cloudy Bay 751:Ted Howell 542:Winemaking 518:Pinot noir 514:Pinot gris 431:Greek wine 402:wine stubs 317:open tasks 2049:Website: 1819:course.-- 1443:Chaotic42 1408:Chaotic42 996:Macgruder 906:Bourgogne 2000:unsigned 1950:unsigned 1914:unsigned 1843:Amatulić 1802:Nwinther 1722:The lead 1704:Nwinther 1604:WP:UNDUE 1586:Nwinther 1522:article. 1490:history. 1468:unsigned 1319:fair use 1303:fair use 1252:Nwinther 1237:Nwinther 1222:Nwinther 1185:Nwinther 1143:Nwinther 1088:regions. 1069:regions. 912:Burgundy 856:economy. 795:Tetrapak 745:and the 663:Infobox: 638:licensed 599:Copyedit 559:Riesling 502:Grenache 447:, other 412:" ones, 299:inactive 2038:ONIVINS 1678:Tomas e 1527:Terroir 1428:Tomas e 1387:Tomas e 1200:Tomas e 1170:Tomas e 1126:Tomas e 1092:Terroir 1048:WP:LEAD 1019:Tomas e 955:Tomas e 797::-) -- 712:history 708:discuss 604:Aligoté 571:Cleanup 486:Chianti 422:Improve 333:history 254:on the 139:on the 30:C-class 1910:hola 1897:Nickhh 1821:Nickhh 1787:Nickhh 1751:Nickhh 1550:Trends 1161:no way 1121:gloire 1078:Cognac 677:Other: 612:Malbec 510:Merlot 406:region 396:Expand 112:France 103:France 59:France 36:scale. 2025:Pedro 1880:rew D 1066:maybe 869:Benwk 840:Pedro 799:Blorg 786:Italy 716:watch 534:Syrah 408:and " 343:purge 338:watch 218:drink 2141:talk 2120:talk 2104:talk 2085:talk 2061:talk 2029:talk 2008:talk 1982:talk 1958:talk 1922:talk 1901:talk 1885:alby 1848:talk 1825:talk 1806:talk 1791:talk 1755:talk 1708:talk 1682:talk 1616:Agne 1590:talk 1565:Agne 1555:The 1548:The 1536:The 1525:The 1510:The 1502:The 1494:The 1476:talk 1447:talk 1441:5GL. 1432:talk 1412:talk 1391:talk 1375:talk 1356:talk 1311:this 1269:Agne 1256:talk 1241:talk 1226:talk 1204:talk 1189:talk 1174:talk 1147:talk 1130:talk 1102:Agne 1023:talk 1000:talk 975:Agne 959:talk 932:Agne 898:Agne 790:here 704:edit 700:view 579:and 462:Wine 328:edit 216:and 214:food 169:Wine 131:High 1875:And 1610:or 1082:Kir 822:POV 488:, 246:Low 2155:: 2143:) 2106:) 2087:) 2063:) 2031:) 2010:) 1984:) 1960:) 1924:) 1903:) 1827:) 1808:) 1793:) 1785:-- 1757:) 1710:) 1684:) 1626:` 1592:) 1478:) 1449:) 1434:) 1414:) 1393:) 1377:) 1358:) 1321:. 1258:) 1243:) 1228:) 1206:) 1191:) 1176:) 1149:) 1132:) 1025:) 1002:) 961:) 930:. 914:. 867:-- 838:-- 714:• 710:• 706:• 702:• 668:, 654:, 622:, 618:, 614:, 610:, 606:, 561:, 557:, 540:, 536:, 532:, 528:, 524:, 520:, 516:, 512:, 508:, 504:, 500:, 496:, 492:, 484:, 480:, 476:, 472:, 468:, 464:, 443:, 439:, 433:, 429:, 385:, 371:: 273:/ 167:: 2139:( 2122:) 2118:( 2102:( 2083:( 2059:( 2027:( 2006:( 1980:( 1956:( 1920:( 1899:( 1850:) 1846:( 1823:( 1804:( 1789:( 1753:( 1706:( 1680:( 1620:/ 1588:( 1569:/ 1474:( 1445:( 1430:( 1410:( 1389:( 1373:( 1354:( 1273:/ 1254:( 1239:( 1224:( 1202:( 1187:( 1172:( 1145:( 1128:( 1106:/ 1084:. 1021:( 998:( 979:/ 957:( 936:/ 749:. 649:: 634:: 601:: 583:. 573:: 552:: 459:: 424:: 398:: 389:. 380:: 319:: 302:. 258:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
France
WikiProject icon
France portal
WikiProject France
France
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Food and drink
Wine
WikiProject icon
icon
Food portal
WikiProject Food and drink
food
drink
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Wines task force
inactive
open tasks
edit
history

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑