1183:
vine. But it's hardly a prominent grape. It was simply a way of echoing Agne27's "to-do"-list. You can call it "other regions" or you can make a level 2 heading for all of them. I'm not trying to be in the make an upscale anything. Regarding the Trend-discussion, we should move it to the history-section as "recent history" or something. And if we decide to keep it, we should keep an eye on it, as it's an area open to change (obviously). And if someone's read the newest rant from some critic (and someone will), they might want to put that in there. Reminds me of a line once written on
Chateau Petrus, that Parker now found Penfold's Grange to be a superiour wine.--
827:
often accompanies with a promotion of some other type of wine. There are also written in an extremely sweeping assumptive language as if the editor knows what a large population wants or needs. The more I delve into this, the more I assume a vested interest by the editor(s) involved. It seems that there are few editors present in
Knowledge that care enough about French wine to promote an unbiased viewpoint, so it seems these edits have been allowed to infiltrate almost every level. I appeal to the editor(s) in question to define their motivation to further a pretty bald bias. --
355:
185:
158:
1290:
285:
74:
53:
84:
22:
1769:
Spain) and competes with Italy for the position of having the world's largest wine production. The history of French wine goes back to the 6th century BCE, with many of France's regions dating their wine-making history to Roman times. The wines produced today range from expensive high-end wines sold internationally, to more modest wines usually only seen within France.
195:
2023:
quality and moderation now, and buy 750ml bottles, as people are going away from Soda, they redevelop the taste and pleasure of wines, after some time, a good idea is moving to drinking water after leaving sugar-filled soda drinks, and then to wine, and see the results on their skin appearance, weight and drinking pleasure. --
1781:
producers have benefited in recent years from the increased demand and prices for some of the prestige wines from
Burgundy and Bordeaux, the French wine industry as a whole has suffered from a decline in domestic consumption as well as growing competition from both the New World and other European countries.
1369:.. does not, in this context, mean "at the estate", but "at the cooperative". In a few cases the grapes will be vinified separately and the wine bottled under the name of the grower's 'chateau', but most growers simply sell their grapes to the cooperative (getting paid by quantity and sugar content).
2045:
ONIVINS doesn't exist anymore. This governlment agency has been merged with others to form, first, VINIFLHOR, then FranceAgriMer. It has never been an association of vintners, but a government agency, whose mission is to control the application of French laws about vineyard planting and quality, to
1942:
I'm growing pretty tired of the obvious vandalism that permeates all the France-related articles. If you tiresome, whining
Americans don't have something better to do than to vandalise wikipedian pages please just sod off! I removed the links, because both of them was very critical towards the French
1780:
France is the source of many grape varieties (such as
Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Sauvignon Blanc and Syrah) that are now planted throughout the world, as well as several wine-making practices and styles of wine that are copied and imitated in other producing countries. Although some
1583:
problem is touched upon in your original assessment. Tomas e doesn't agree with this "selection" where we (you and I) emphazises a small group of regions and, well neglects the rest. To me, emphazising the big six makes sense. It doesn't make sense to equalize all regions in, say USA, then why should
1234:
I was thinking about the referencing of the page. I'm looking into a rewrite of the "big 6+" section to expand them slightly, and came to think of the referencing of those sections. How do we reference on summaries that are throughly referenced in their proper articles? Do I find new (my own) sources
972:
article already. But I agree with your assessment that the lead needs some reworking. While it should include a brief summary of history about France's first vineyards and monumental events like phylloxera, at the bare minimum the lead should include comments on where France ranks in world production
826:
It is my view that much of French wine is infected with a negative POV. There is much talk of the problems facing French wine here and elsewhere which are very real and germane. However, not only are the problems listed in a much larger volume compared to any other type of information, but they are
769:
BTW- tasters at The St. Catharines Wine
Tasting of 2005 were all Canadian and included writers for Canadian wine magazines, professors and students at the local University, and 8 members of the Ontario wine industry(!). Nothing against Canadian wine, but this trumpeting of the results of this (minor)
1818:
OK, well that's one vote! I'll swap them over and people can always add in any small points that they feel are missing (for example it doesn't tackle the food issue). Other than that I think it's got about the right level of introductory detail - more info is there in the main part of the article of
1726:
I note the article as a whole is already the topic of some discussion, but particularly with some recent changes, the lead is getting very unwieldy (I note someone's just tagged it as too long) and also probably a little too exuberant in saying how great French wine is and in making generalisations,
1421:
Hectoliter is the standard measure for larger quantities of wine. Almost all wine statistics is reported in hl (rather than liter or m), so it's the unit that facilitates comparison across countries and sources. Feel free to add the same figure in additional measures (the number of bottles have been
811:
Having browsed around the French Wine entries in
Knowledge, I have to say that in general, the representation of French wine here is in a shambles. Far from wishing only to complain, I plan on adding what I can. There's certainly a lot to be done. Is anyone else interested in rallying a concerted
792:
for example, although those figures are from 1998 and show Italy just slightly ahead and
Italian production decining faster than French. I've heard mentioned that France produces the most 'quality' wine in the world, whatever that means, presumably wine over a certain base price threshold. Maybe the
1774:
Two concepts central to higher end French wines are the notion of “terroir”, which links the style of the wines to the specific locations where the grapes are grown and the wine is made, and the
Appellation d'Origine Contrôlée (AOC) system. Appellation rules closely define which grape varieties and
1463:
This paragraph in "Trends" is highly misleading: Â "The result has been a continuing wine glut, often called the wine lake. This has led to the distillation of wine into industrial alcohol as well as a government program to pay farmers to pull up their grape vines through vine pull schemes. A large
1219:
I've made some edits, added a few sources and a picture et al. - However, I think the article lacks some technical data, such as amount of wine produced, area under vines and so on and so forth. Is there some tempelate we can borrow from somewhere, that we can institute on more pages (italian wine,
1197:
Well, I don't really see the need for grouping the regions into "quality classes" in the overview article. The description of each region and the history section will make it obvious that
Bordeaux has been traded for long, that Champagne is the world's most noted sparkling wine and so on. But we do
1182:
Then call it something else. I may be wrong, but I don't see any of those regions as particularily prominent. They have a history, repeat history, of producing bulk wine. Not wine of prominence. And while the regions may be large, that hardly constitutes prominence. Arien is the worlds most planted
1163:
that you can label Languedoc-Roussillon (by far the largest region, and arguably the one where most new things have happened over the last decade or two) and South-West (parts of which had a quality reputation centuries before Bordeaux) as "less prominent" without being very POV. To me, that's more
993:
My geography is a bit sketchy, but I seem to remember that Paris is somewhere inland on the Seine. However, I was surprised to see on the wine map that it is now a huge island off the West coast of France. On a serious note it seems unnecessary as Paris doesn't itself produce wine that the 'island'
1768:
French wine is produced in several regions throughout France on over 800,000 hectares (over 2 million acres) of vineyards. In a typical year between 50 and 60 million hectolitres of wine is produced, or some 7 to 8 billion bottles. France has the world's second-largest total vineyard area (behind
1562:
The only significant section that I think is missing is something commenting on the role of wine in French culture. This is touched upon in the lead but there is no where else in the article where it is given more extensive treatment. It would be a tricky section to write, and one that needs rock
1540:
is a tricky part. With the short 1-3 line sections, it looks pretty bad. But at the same time, this is a section that could easily overwhelm the article. I mentioned in my Feb assessment that I think the "Big Six" should have at least a strong paragraph worth of content and I still think that is
1405:
I'm an American, which is apparently a dangerous thing to be on this page, but I notice that the production estimates are 50-60 million hectoliters. To me, this would sound better as 5-6 gigaliters or 5-6 billion liters. 50-60 million hectoliters just sounds odd. Are hectoliters commonly used to
1140:
I've done some of the things listed (VdP, Wine regions), though a cleanup and expansion may be needed. Regarding the "trend" section: Is it really needed? Why not delete it all together? After all, from what I read, the "trend" is very alternating, sometimes prominent wine personalities declares
1118:
Good thoughts, although I think that if everything in the list was fixed, it would reasonably be a GA. The trends section could probably be split between the history section and a new "commercial aspects" section, but here more than for many other parts, extensive referencing is needed. Not just
2074:
Apparently, the French wine industry was saved by importing California vines that were resistant to Phylloxera , which is native to North America. The Wik article "Great French Wine Blight" (which does not have a French page)pretty much supports this, naming Texas as the source of the savior
2022:
Anyway, is the wine consumption decreasing in Latin Europe? That sounds misleading. In the past in here (northern portugal) people bought 5L wine bottles. In recent years, it is a whole world apart, it is trendy and healthier than drinking soda drinks filled with sugar, people search for better
1155:
Perhaps "trends" was a badly chosen term; what I meant was "developments of the last few decades" as distinct from "history over several centuries". Things like decreasing domestic consumption, increased new world competition, vineyard restructuring, improvement in southern France, branding and
1506:
section needs significant referencing and a little NPOV revision. My comments from Feb still have some relevance as much more content could be added. It may be worth to start the section off talking about the different styles (sparkling, fortified, etc) and then create a sub-header about grape
1584:
it be so in France. However Tomas e has a valid point. So unless we can reach some sort of agreement, I think we should go with the way it looks now. The "culture" thingy will be difficult, but I'll look into it. I'll cross out each paragraph as I finish (everyone is welcome to join in).--
1489:
The "summary" history section is a little disjointed and needs to be fleshed out a little more. It certainly doesn't need to include everything, especially now that we have a splinter history article, but it probably needs about 2 full paragraphs in order to give a broad overview of the
855:
I wonder about our current statistic that American importation of wine from France dropped 50% in 2003. I had previously read that this "boycott" was largely a fabrication of anti-French individuals like Bill O'Reilly and that there was little or no discernable impact on the
1675:
I must say that I'm surprised to see Sotheby having such a weak coverage of Languedoc-Roussillon and Sud-Ouest! To me, that seems like taking a bit outdated view on French wine. Other figures to consider could be production volume, economic volume, number of appellations...
1995:
This is the current caption to one of the photos in the article: "French wines are usually made to accompany food." It seems a rather sweeping (and fairly false) statement. Should it be changed? I think it should be changed. But I don't have the wikinerve to change it...
1727:
eg with phrases like "the world leader regarding not only quantity but also quality", "many other countries find inspiration in the french system", "French wine plays an important role in French identity and pride" etc. Plus isn't it standard for the lead to start "
866:
Negative POV, indeed: "...it's becoming increasingly difficult for French producers to compete internationally, and in traditional French fashion, they are beginning to surrender." Perhaps the article would be better off without this cheap crack at the French.
1339:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
1464:
part of this glut is caused by the re-emergence of Languedoc wine." The wine glut existed 20 years ago and the wine pull-up scheme was dropped almost a decade ago. That the wine glut would be due to "the re-emergence of Languedoc wine" is simply false.
1440:
Thanks for the explanation, I didn't know that. In that case, I think it's fine. I suppose we could put "(~1.4 billion US gallons)" after the figure, but I don't think it's a requirement. It's just as hard to visualize 1.4B gallons as it is to visualize
1606:. As interesting as the wines of Jura and Savoie are, there is no balanced encyclopedic reason that they should be devoted equal space to Burgundy or the Loire Valley. I think our coverage should be on par with what is found in reliable sources like
837:
I agree. It is infected and attempts to promote some wines. This occurs in several articles. Are grape varieties that important for the consumer? In here the trend is the wine region followed by brand. And most wines mix different grape varieties.
1087:
Climate & Geography. Some type of summary about major features like rivers, Massif Central, Mistral winds etc and the varying influences of continental, maritime and Mediterranean climates. Brief summary on different soil types in the major
1075:
Wine styles. Currently it is merged into a grape variety section. Ideally this should probably be split out into its own section and go into some summary about the particular sparkling, fortified, botrytized wines. Maybe also a brief touch on
1249:
I'm looking to give this article another go. It seems to have stalled despite being the wine-drive on Wikiproject Wine. However, I'd like it if someone (Agne?) would review his list of 18 february 2008 (above). Nice to have a to-do-list. Any
1017:? :-) On a more serious note, the magnification of the Paris area, set to the left of the French mainland is obviously quite irrelevant to a map of French wine regions. I replaced it with another, much less cluttered and more stylized map.
1422:
calculated for the benefit of the general reader), but please do not change the basic figure, since it's actually quoted from the source given. I assume that the historical background is that most wine barrels are a couple of hl in size (
1406:
measure quanitites of wine? I know that hecto- and deca- don't get much love, but I propose changing the phrasing here. Anyway, I'm off to McDonald's to whine, sod-off, and look for France on the map of Asia on the back of the placemat.
1158:
By the way, I disagree strongly with your classification of several regions into a bunch of "less prominent regions". You could probably put Jura and Savoy under such a label because of their very limited production, but there is
895:
has been put up for deletion. A potential outcome could be a request to merge the relevant information into this article so any input (or improvements) that could be given from the editors of this article would be appreciated.
1426:= 225 l, for example), so it has stuck as the most convenient metric (if not basic SI) measure at winery level. Statistics for grapes harvest is usually in tonnes, while vineyards are in hectares (Europe) or acres (e.g. US).
1867:
I am going to rewrite this, giving a footnote for the two very important details that I am changing. If anyone thinks that I (and the website I cite) have got this wrong, by all means correct me and cite another source!
1763:
Further to the above I thought I'd post a proposed draft here rather than plonk it in the article immediately. Grateful for any thoughts - I've based it mostly on previous versions, but just stripped quite a bit out -
1384:
Well, the statement about what "au domaine" means is wrong as well, as far as I can say... But what this article really needs are not just corrected statements, but reliably sourced statements. Feel free to help...
1731:
is ..."? Currently it does more of less cover all the key points (as below), so I guess it just needs some copyediting and the removal of both some of the detail/wordiness and some of the broader generalisations -
892:
1123:
of the world's #1 wine country. IMHO, wine and food pairing is an even more difficult subject than description of wine flavours if you want to avoid POV. But perhaps there are better sources than I'm aware of.
973:(sort of like the current third paragraph but it is a little inaccurate since Italy surpasses Frances in some years) and a overview of the major wine regions as well as a brief touch on the concept of terroir.
1068:
Languedoc & Provence) should probably have at least a paragraph summary leading into their main articles. It is hard to truly be an overview of "French wine" without providing some summary about these
1541:
needed. Some of the smaller regions like Jura, Corsica and Southwest France should maybe grouped into a sub heading titled "Other regions". I'm also wondering if it is worthwhile to make another splinter
1053:
The history section is missing ALOT of important detail. It is not bad considering that until a few weeks ago, this article didn't have a history section at all. In the long run there problem should be a
1895:
Although it now says that bottled at the domaine means it was bottled where it was grown (or at a co-op), and means it is the product of a single vineyard - isn't that still a little restrictive? --
1471:
1702:
Regarding the "Wine in french culture"-part, wouldn't it be useful to get one from the France-project to look into that? Most of my material on Wine only deals with that subject superficially.
1736:
Production levels, history, prestige (and the fact that the main grape varieties are now planted throughout the world and the key styles are imitated and copied. Or over-imitated if you will)
1050:. While a lot of wine articles have the opposite problem of not having enough of a summary, this one actually has too much and several details that are not found in the rest of the article.
1336:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1775:
winemaking practices are allowed in each of France's several hundred geographically defined appellations, which can cover entire regions, individual villages or even specific vineyards.
1871:
The translation "domaine" = "field" was just a simple mistake: no need to cite a source for changing that, I think. No one can imagine that wines are bottled "at the field", surely.
1559:
section with its one line should either be eliminated or expanded. There is some benefit in keeping the content and expanding it to include some of the major regional organizations.
1141:
french wine "dead" or "struggeling" sometimes it's the latest craze and have been "reborn" and so on. I see a hornets nest that just begs for a lot of PoV and all that follows.--
293:
168:
1507:
varieties and their association with major region. If we have a reliable, updated source-maybe a listing of the top 10 grape varieties by plantings would be helpful as well.
1946:
So. That's what you call thinking? The most vandalized articles in this so called encyclopedia are American and it's done by whining Europeans which includes you British.
1936:"the typical French person drank local wine and, although proud of France's reputation for making some of the world's outstanding wines, knew relatively little about them"
1061:
There could be more details and summary about the Vin de Pays system, especially since those wines are developing more of an emerging presence on the world's wine market.
680:
847:
Dear BridgeBurner- Please see the message I left on your talk page several days ago. In the meantime, I'm workiing on a general wine competitions page. Best regards.
2178:
245:
953:. While the history is quite interesting, the first 9 lines of the article (in my browser) are only about history; they would belong better in a history section.
927:
1064:
Wine Regions-This area has certainly been improved in the last few weeks but I think the "Big 6" regions (Bordeaux, Loire, Burgundy, Alsace, Champagne, Rhone---
2183:
1841:
I'm the one who tagged the lead as too long. It's still on the long side, but more importantly, your version is much better in terms of neutrality. Thanks. ~
589:
1317:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
221:
2173:
2163:
130:
1514:
section needs referencing. It could use some expansion but I'm wondering if that would be too much content. We may want to think about creating a
1314:
636:
Just about all of them! Any pictures of wine regions, grape varieties or wine would be useful. In particular we need wine region maps that can be
140:
1614:
where major regions are giving significantly more coverage than minor ones. Take for example Sotheby's with the breakdown of pages per regions.
1552:
section should probably be incorporated into the history section, at least as a sub-section. It also needs a good POV scrubbing and referencing.
1341:
1333:
1329:
1306:
2168:
707:
255:
2056:
1094:
section could do a little better summary than a few lines. It maybe best to merge it into the intro on the Wine region section as a segway.
1058:
article with this section serving as a summary. In the meantime though, a B class article would have a more well developed history section.
208:
163:
2003:
1976:
is omitted. I don't have access to the stats, but it's worth a better look, and the figures being dated, as they will evolve over time.
1745:
Recent issues (eg decline in domestic consumption, greater competition in world markets, split between the elite producers and the rest)
1345:
298:
1529:
section seems out of place. II t could be either expanded to a more full fledged section or maybe incorporated as a sub-section of the
2099:
2080:
1953:
1917:
1475:
106:
2158:
699:
2018:
why it seems false to you? to me it sounds quite trivial. But the article is written for a global audience, for instance Asians.
651:
570:
2098:
Whether it is due to changing tastes or some other factor(s), the addition of RS material on this would improve the article.
1883:
1072:
Trends section seems awfully OR. Ideally it should be referencing and merged into the history section as part of "Modern day"
684:
665:
1119:
because it could be OR, it's POV-prone territory where some edits may want to either engage in France-bashing or defend the
1961:
1749:
It should be possible to keep to a very brief neutral/factual paragraph on each, and leave it a manageable size overall? --
631:
1485:
This article has certainly improved significantly since I last reviewed it. Here are some thoughts on future improvement.
789:
637:
549:
456:
742:
2113:
That section has zero citations already, so any claims it makes are suspicious. Any citations at all would improve it. ~
2042:
The page says: L'Office national interprofessionnel des vins, abbreviated ONIVINS, is a French association of vintners.
1618:
1567:
1271:
1104:
977:
934:
448:
421:
377:
97:
58:
33:
1325:
1297:
386:
655:
646:
598:
405:
366:
316:
220:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1043:
Referencing. While not horrendous, there are a couple section and several important claims that need referencing.
746:
2140:
1374:
1355:
440:
2060:
949:
I'm quite unhappy with the way the article starts right now. This is an article on French wine, not about the
2007:
1957:
1563:
solid references, but if it could be done it would be a very educational and important part of the article.
669:
444:
413:
2103:
2084:
1921:
1879:
1055:
969:
788:
produced the most wine in the world, often in the context of it being underappreciated outside Italy! See
1542:
2119:
615:
39:
1515:
382:
857:
1999:
1981:
1949:
1913:
1545:
which could go more indepth about each regions and scrap this entire section in lieu a summary style.
1467:
1014:
878:
750:
1301:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
21:
2136:
1446:
1411:
1370:
1351:
1165:
999:
409:
401:
395:
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2028:
1847:
1805:
1707:
1589:
1302:
1255:
1240:
1225:
1188:
1146:
554:
868:
1873:
1681:
1519:
1431:
1390:
1235:
or do I rely on the ones in the proper article (and don't source at all in theses segments)?--
1203:
1173:
1129:
1022:
958:
848:
828:
813:
354:
2114:
1900:
1824:
1790:
1754:
1621:
1570:
1274:
1107:
980:
937:
481:
1977:
1603:
1100:
Two MAJOR topics on the relationship of French wine to the culture and cuisine of France.
562:
477:
465:
1442:
1407:
1047:
995:
968:
I'm surprise there is not already a history section, heck I'm surprise we don't have a
771:
761:
607:
529:
435:
1289:
994:
can be removed from the map. If of course someone has moved Paris please ignore this.
741:
BTW- Our wine industry in Canada has been doing great in recent competitions. See the
184:
157:
2152:
2024:
1842:
1801:
1703:
1585:
1251:
1236:
1221:
1184:
1142:
839:
473:
469:
426:
89:
2046:
produce socio-economic data on grapevine sector and to support experimentations.
1677:
1427:
1386:
1318:
1199:
1169:
1125:
1018:
1010:
954:
623:
525:
521:
505:
489:
1896:
1820:
1786:
1750:
1615:
1564:
1268:
1101:
974:
931:
897:
619:
537:
497:
493:
200:
798:
603:
541:
517:
513:
430:
190:
79:
73:
52:
2135:
What about Bergerac? It's Knowledge entry says it's a wine-growing region.
284:
2076:
1498:
section needs some referencing but overall seems to cover the topic well.
794:
580:
558:
501:
576:
485:
1046:
The Lead section could use some editorial discretion in accordance to
194:
1931:
1077:
611:
509:
102:
1267:
Sure, I'll have some free time tomorrow and I'll take another look.
1037:
Here are some thoughts on ways to get this article up to a B class:
893:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Problems in the French Wine Industry
2144:
2124:
2107:
2088:
2064:
2032:
2011:
1985:
1925:
1904:
1889:
1852:
1828:
1809:
1794:
1758:
1711:
1685:
1623:
1593:
1572:
1479:
1450:
1435:
1415:
1394:
1378:
1359:
1276:
1259:
1244:
1229:
1207:
1192:
1177:
1150:
1133:
1109:
1026:
1003:
982:
962:
939:
900:
881:
871:
860:
831:
816:
812:
effort to make the entries on French Wine full and informative? --
801:
774:
764:
753:
785:
533:
217:
461:
213:
2050:
1973:
1081:
15:
2079:) has info from the Columbia Encyc. and a book on the blight.
1579:
Thanks Agne. I agree with most of your thoughts. However the
1288:
283:
1313:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
1932:
I'm thinking about to start vandalising American pages...
1156:
changing labelling practices, more corporate influence...
715:
711:
703:
342:
337:
332:
327:
910:
This is an English-language entry so one should use
759:
Ottawa Wine Tasting of 2005 article has been deleted
212:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1344:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
1285:
Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-vigneron Thmb.jpg
266:
688:
296:, a project which is currently considered to be
1943:wine industry and is an ill disguised POV...
928:L'Office national interprofessionnel des vins
8:
888:Relevant French wine article up for deletion
1465:
1033:Thoughts on getting this article up to a B
590:Unreferenced biographies of living persons
311:
263:
152:
47:
1533:section since it is intimately connected.
770:tasting needs to be kept in perspective.
575:Cleanup lists of wine-related articles:
1198:need better sourcing for this article!
154:
49:
19:
2179:Low-importance Food and drink articles
2094:reasons for declining wine consumption
2077:http://arlindo-correia.com/060904.html
1472:2A01:CB04:110:C800:1CAD:92D0:15A9:C2BB
1334:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
687:. Add to the Wikiquote page for wine:
1974:http://en.wikipedia.org/Petit_Manseng
1602:Well I think we should be mindful of
1531:Quality levels and appellation system
1496:Quality levels and appellation system
7:
1972:This is incomplete: for example the
1168:thinking than encyclopedic writing.
656:Nominations for top level importance
292:This article is within the scope of
230:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink
206:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
2184:WikiProject Food and drink articles
1220:american wine, german wine etc.)?--
926:section is from the merged article
743:St. Catharines Wine Tasting of 2005
363:Here are some tasks you can do for
233:Template:WikiProject Food and drink
38:It is of interest to the following
1939:Why is this phrase in wikipedia ?
877:I've removed the biased vandalism.
14:
793:most wine in bottles rather than
1332:. Using one of the templates at
1098:Culture and Food pairing section
387:Great Wine Capitals of the World
353:
193:
183:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
2174:C-Class Food and drink articles
2164:High-importance France articles
1504:Wine styles and grape varieties
1459:Updated thoughts on improvement
250:This article has been rated as
135:This article has been rated as
2012:17:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
1658:Provence & Corsica-5 pages
1346:Media copyright questions page
666:Template:Infobox grape variety
1:
2065:11:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
1905:11:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
1890:18:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
1853:19:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1829:09:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1810:09:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1795:09:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
1612:Jancis Robinson's Wine Course
1451:00:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
1436:00:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
1416:23:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
1315:boilerplate fair use template
1134:11:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
1110:01:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
1004:09:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
983:22:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
963:20:43, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
224:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
2169:All WikiProject France pages
2051:http://www.franceagrimer.fr/
1926:12:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
1759:19:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1712:12:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
1686:00:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
1624:23:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
1594:20:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
1573:19:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
1342:criteria for speedy deletion
1298:Image:Logo-vigneron Thmb.jpg
1277:17:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1260:12:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1080:and wine based spirits like
940:03:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
901:20:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
802:19:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
775:20:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
765:20:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
698:
115:Knowledge:WikiProject France
1608:Sotheby's Wine Encyclopedia
1027:02:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
922:Some of the content in the
747:Ottawa Wine Tasting of 2005
118:Template:WikiProject France
2200:
2033:12:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
1395:16:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1379:13:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
1326:the image description page
861:10:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
832:18:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
256:project's importance scale
209:WikiProject Food and drink
141:project's importance scale
2145:18:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
2125:15:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
2108:04:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
2089:02:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
1649:Jura & Savoie-4 pages
1518:splinter, similar to the
1480:17:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
1360:13:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
1328:and edit it to include a
1245:08:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
842:14:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC
817:19:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
784:I have always heard that
310:
291:
262:
249:
178:
134:
67:
46:
1986:13:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
1652:Southwest France-7 pages
1307:explanation or rationale
1230:16:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1208:13:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1193:12:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1178:12:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
1151:09:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
882:18:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
872:13:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
754:15:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
441:wine serving temperature
2159:C-Class France articles
1962:14:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
945:Introduction of article
670:Template:Infobox winery
445:Western Australian wine
414:Western Australian wine
236:Food and drink articles
2131:Wine regions of France
1581:Wine regions of France
1538:Wine regions of France
1401:50 million hectoliters
1293:
1056:History of French wine
989:Paris in the Atlantic?
970:History of French wine
951:history of French wine
681:grape article template
288:
28:This article is rated
1309:as to why its use in
1292:
652:Operation stub-killer
616:Robert M. Parker, Jr.
287:
1863:Mis en bouteille ...
581:articles by category
449:Start class articles
1543:French wine regions
1424:Barrique bordelaise
807:Rallying the Troops
780:Largest production?
404:, particularly the
267:Related taskforces:
2075:vines. This page (
1637:Champagne-15 pages
1512:Labeling practices
1330:fair use rationale
1294:
1166:upscale wine guide
555:Cabernet Sauvignon
289:
98:WikiProject France
34:content assessment
2123:
2002:comment added by
1952:comment added by
1916:comment added by
1851:
1655:Languedoc-8 pages
1634:Burgundy-34 pages
1631:Bordeaux-68 pages
1520:German wine label
1516:French wine label
1482:
1470:comment added by
1009:Well, there is a
734:
733:
730:
729:
726:
725:
722:
721:
697:
696:
383:Sebastiani family
315:WikiProject Wine
306:
305:
151:
150:
147:
146:
2191:
2117:
2055:A French reader
2014:
1964:
1928:
1888:
1886:
1876:
1845:
1800:Looks fine to me
1305:but there is no
918:Attribution note
482:Champagne (wine)
400:any of the ~700
367:WikiProject Wine
357:
349:
348:
312:
294:Wines task force
274:
264:
238:
237:
234:
231:
228:
203:
198:
197:
187:
180:
179:
174:
171:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2199:
2198:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2149:
2148:
2133:
2096:
2072:
2040:
1997:
1993:
1970:
1968:Grape Varieties
1947:
1934:
1911:
1884:
1874:
1872:
1865:
1724:
1640:Alsace-12 pages
1461:
1403:
1367:
1287:
1035:
1015:Paris, Atlantic
1013:, so why not a
991:
947:
920:
908:
890:
824:
809:
782:
739:
718:
693:
679:Comment on the
563:Sauvignon blanc
478:California wine
466:Australian wine
378:Article request
358:
347:
272:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:
199:
192:
172:
166:
137:High-importance
121:France articles
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
62:High‑importance
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
2197:
2195:
2187:
2186:
2181:
2176:
2171:
2166:
2161:
2151:
2150:
2137:Paul Magnussen
2132:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2095:
2092:
2071:
2068:
2057:147.100.144.97
2039:
2036:
2020:
2019:
1992:
1989:
1969:
1966:
1933:
1930:
1908:
1907:
1864:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1813:
1812:
1783:
1782:
1777:
1776:
1771:
1770:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1740:
1737:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1647:
1646:Rhone-11 pages
1644:
1643:Loire-17 pages
1641:
1638:
1635:
1632:
1597:
1596:
1576:
1575:
1560:
1553:
1546:
1534:
1523:
1508:
1500:
1491:
1460:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1371:Philip Trueman
1366:
1365:à la propriété
1363:
1352:BetacommandBot
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1157:
1137:
1136:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1095:
1089:
1085:
1073:
1070:
1062:
1059:
1051:
1044:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1029:
990:
987:
986:
985:
946:
943:
919:
916:
907:
904:
889:
886:
885:
884:
864:
863:
852:
851:
844:
843:
823:
820:
808:
805:
781:
778:
772:Steve.Moulding
762:Steve.Moulding
738:
735:
732:
731:
728:
727:
724:
723:
720:
719:
695:
694:
692:
691:
689:Wikiquote wine
673:
672:
659:
658:
642:
641:
640:for Knowledge.
627:
626:
608:Cabernet franc
594:
593:
585:
584:
566:
565:
550:Articles to FA
545:
544:
530:Sparkling wine
457:Articles to GA
452:
451:
436:Vitis vinifera
417:
416:
391:
390:
373:
360:
359:
352:
346:
345:
340:
335:
330:
324:
321:
320:
308:
307:
304:
303:
290:
280:
279:
277:
275:
269:
268:
260:
259:
252:Low-importance
248:
242:
241:
239:
227:Food and drink
222:the discussion
205:
204:
188:
176:
175:
173:Low‑importance
164:Food and drink
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2196:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2175:
2172:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2160:
2157:
2156:
2154:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2130:
2126:
2121:
2116:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2093:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2069:
2067:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2053:
2052:
2047:
2043:
2037:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2004:86.139.40.179
2001:
1991:Photo Caption
1990:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1967:
1965:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1944:
1940:
1937:
1929:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1887:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1869:
1862:
1854:
1849:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1779:
1778:
1773:
1772:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1744:
1741:
1738:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1730:
1721:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1561:
1558:
1557:Organizations
1554:
1551:
1547:
1544:
1539:
1535:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1499:
1497:
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1458:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1348:. Thank you.
1347:
1343:
1337:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1324:Please go to
1322:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1291:
1284:
1278:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1162:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1099:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
988:
984:
981:
978:
976:
971:
967:
966:
965:
964:
960:
956:
952:
944:
942:
941:
938:
935:
933:
929:
925:
924:Organizations
917:
915:
913:
905:
903:
902:
899:
894:
887:
883:
880:
876:
875:
874:
873:
870:
862:
859:
854:
853:
850:
846:
845:
841:
836:
835:
834:
833:
830:
821:
819:
818:
815:
806:
804:
803:
800:
796:
791:
787:
779:
777:
776:
773:
767:
766:
763:
760:
756:
755:
752:
748:
744:
736:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
690:
686:
685:grape infobox
682:
678:
675:
674:
671:
667:
664:
661:
660:
657:
653:
650:
648:
647:Collaboration
644:
643:
639:
635:
633:
632:Photo request
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
602:
600:
596:
595:
592:
591:
587:
586:
582:
578:
574:
572:
568:
567:
564:
560:
556:
553:
551:
547:
546:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:Burgundy wine
471:
470:Bordeaux wine
467:
463:
460:
458:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
432:
428:
427:Canadian wine
425:
423:
419:
418:
415:
411:
410:miscellaneous
407:
403:
399:
397:
393:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
374:
372:
370:
369:
368:
361:
356:
351:
350:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
325:
323:
322:
318:
314:
313:
309:
301:
300:
295:
286:
282:
281:
278:
276:
271:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
247:
244:
243:
240:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:
202:
196:
191:
189:
186:
182:
181:
177:
170:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
90:France portal
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2134:
2100:50.111.44.55
2097:
2081:64.53.191.77
2073:
2054:
2048:
2044:
2041:
2021:
1998:— Preceding
1994:
1971:
1954:50.32.45.168
1945:
1941:
1938:
1935:
1918:87.33.97.130
1909:
1878:
1870:
1866:
1784:
1762:
1748:
1742:Link to food
1728:
1725:
1611:
1607:
1580:
1556:
1549:
1537:
1530:
1526:
1511:
1503:
1495:
1493:
1484:
1466:— Preceding
1462:
1423:
1404:
1368:
1350:
1338:
1323:
1310:
1296:
1295:
1248:
1233:
1218:
1160:
1120:
1097:
1091:
1065:
1036:
1011:Paris, Texas
992:
950:
948:
923:
921:
911:
909:
891:
865:
849:David Justin
829:BridgeBurner
825:
814:BridgeBurner
810:
783:
768:
758:
757:
740:
676:
662:
645:
630:
624:Rioja (wine)
597:
588:
577:all articles
569:
548:
526:Spanish wine
522:Rioja (wine)
506:Italian wine
490:Dessert wine
455:
434:
420:
394:
376:
365:
364:
362:
297:
251:
207:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
2115:Anachronist
1948:—Preceding
1912:—Preceding
1739:Terroir/AOC
1729:French wine
1250:thoughts?--
858:64.12.116.6
737:Canada wine
683:and on the
620:Pinot blanc
538:Tempranillo
498:German wine
494:French wine
201:Food portal
2153:Categories
2070:Phylloxera
1978:Richardhod
879:Cloudy Bay
751:Ted Howell
542:Winemaking
518:Pinot noir
514:Pinot gris
431:Greek wine
402:wine stubs
317:open tasks
2049:Website:
1819:course.--
1443:Chaotic42
1408:Chaotic42
996:Macgruder
906:Bourgogne
2000:unsigned
1950:unsigned
1914:unsigned
1843:Amatulić
1802:Nwinther
1722:The lead
1704:Nwinther
1604:WP:UNDUE
1586:Nwinther
1522:article.
1490:history.
1468:unsigned
1319:fair use
1303:fair use
1252:Nwinther
1237:Nwinther
1222:Nwinther
1185:Nwinther
1143:Nwinther
1088:regions.
1069:regions.
912:Burgundy
856:economy.
795:Tetrapak
745:and the
663:Infobox:
638:licensed
599:Copyedit
559:Riesling
502:Grenache
447:, other
412:" ones,
299:inactive
2038:ONIVINS
1678:Tomas e
1527:Terroir
1428:Tomas e
1387:Tomas e
1200:Tomas e
1170:Tomas e
1126:Tomas e
1092:Terroir
1048:WP:LEAD
1019:Tomas e
955:Tomas e
797::-) --
712:history
708:discuss
604:Aligoté
571:Cleanup
486:Chianti
422:Improve
333:history
254:on the
139:on the
30:C-class
1910:hola
1897:Nickhh
1821:Nickhh
1787:Nickhh
1751:Nickhh
1550:Trends
1161:no way
1121:gloire
1078:Cognac
677:Other:
612:Malbec
510:Merlot
406:region
396:Expand
112:France
103:France
59:France
36:scale.
2025:Pedro
1880:rew D
1066:maybe
869:Benwk
840:Pedro
799:Blorg
786:Italy
716:watch
534:Syrah
408:and "
343:purge
338:watch
218:drink
2141:talk
2120:talk
2104:talk
2085:talk
2061:talk
2029:talk
2008:talk
1982:talk
1958:talk
1922:talk
1901:talk
1885:alby
1848:talk
1825:talk
1806:talk
1791:talk
1755:talk
1708:talk
1682:talk
1616:Agne
1590:talk
1565:Agne
1555:The
1548:The
1536:The
1525:The
1510:The
1502:The
1494:The
1476:talk
1447:talk
1441:5GL.
1432:talk
1412:talk
1391:talk
1375:talk
1356:talk
1311:this
1269:Agne
1256:talk
1241:talk
1226:talk
1204:talk
1189:talk
1174:talk
1147:talk
1130:talk
1102:Agne
1023:talk
1000:talk
975:Agne
959:talk
932:Agne
898:Agne
790:here
704:edit
700:view
579:and
462:Wine
328:edit
216:and
214:food
169:Wine
131:High
1875:And
1610:or
1082:Kir
822:POV
488:,
246:Low
2155::
2143:)
2106:)
2087:)
2063:)
2031:)
2010:)
1984:)
1960:)
1924:)
1903:)
1827:)
1808:)
1793:)
1785:--
1757:)
1710:)
1684:)
1626:`
1592:)
1478:)
1449:)
1434:)
1414:)
1393:)
1377:)
1358:)
1321:.
1258:)
1243:)
1228:)
1206:)
1191:)
1176:)
1149:)
1132:)
1025:)
1002:)
961:)
930:.
914:.
867:--
838:--
714:•
710:•
706:•
702:•
668:,
654:,
622:,
618:,
614:,
610:,
606:,
561:,
557:,
540:,
536:,
532:,
528:,
524:,
520:,
516:,
512:,
508:,
504:,
500:,
496:,
492:,
484:,
480:,
476:,
472:,
468:,
464:,
443:,
439:,
433:,
429:,
385:,
371::
273:/
167::
2139:(
2122:)
2118:(
2102:(
2083:(
2059:(
2027:(
2006:(
1980:(
1956:(
1920:(
1899:(
1850:)
1846:(
1823:(
1804:(
1789:(
1753:(
1706:(
1680:(
1620:/
1588:(
1569:/
1474:(
1445:(
1430:(
1410:(
1389:(
1373:(
1354:(
1273:/
1254:(
1239:(
1224:(
1202:(
1187:(
1172:(
1145:(
1128:(
1106:/
1084:.
1021:(
998:(
979:/
957:(
936:/
749:.
649::
634::
601::
583:.
573::
552::
459::
424::
398::
389:.
380::
319::
302:.
258:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.