Knowledge

Talk:Kepler-22b

Source 📝

31: 163: 91: 64: 514:~40Me. Not only do we know Kepler-22b cannot have a mass of ~40Me (through radial velocity), this is much greater than the mass required for a planet to start accreted hydrogen from the stellar disc (10Me), so what is most likely is a ~10Me rocky core and a 5-10Me Hydrogen envelope. That makes it a totally inhospitable, completely uninhabitable Neptune-like planet. Don't get sucked in by the NASA media hype. 2705:
math. If you watch Bill Boruki's presentation at the Kepler Science Conference he shows a slide presenting the different composition possibilities for Kepler-22b. You can see from the slide that a higher mass planet would be a denser more ocean like planet. I tried to correct this error in the article, but someone reverted it. This should be fixed, since it is an obvious error in the referenced article.
1284: 1337: 22: 101: 3031:, which are pretty close to the final word in these matters. Except apparently they disagree. The Kepler-22 part seems to be pretty standard, but as to whether the b gets a space or not there does not seem to be a single answer. Argh! For now I think we should just leave the title be and go with the mantra of 3659:
Examples of acceptable images include * direct images, such as one used for GJ 758 b, in the rare cases where these are available; * output of a model that is integral to a cited paper, such as the image used in HD 80606 b; * user-generated images that clearly illustrate published properties, such as
3049:
The general question of whether there should be a space between the star number and the planet letter has been the subject of much past discussion, both are used in the literature, where the decision is generally a matter of a given publisher's editorial policy, and not one of established guidelines.
2623:
Okay everyone. Firstly, there is not enough information currently available about the planet. Secondly, too much information is being added which is either irrelevant or repetitive then being removed by one Wikipedian, whilst being reverted by another. This has got to stop. This shouldn't be the most
2281:
I would also have to agree with this. Thing that makes this planet have such hype about it and a reason we are all here making edits is the fact that it is comparable to earth. I think it important to have an easy chart like this to allow us to see the details quick and easy. Also it allows a spot of
1831:
Millions of precedents speak for OR being completely removed. Astrophysics calculations are not BASIC to the general public. I could show you all kinds of RELEVANT math and no one would want it in the article if they disagree with what it says about their special planet. AND at the time that I posted
945:
This sentence should be reworked. Is the author saying that life supporting planets have a size/mass limit? Or is s/he referring to gravity in relation to Earth? Life can be anything from single cell microbes (which, floating in a vast planetary ocean, wouldn't be too bothered by gravity a few times
484:
This seems very unlikely. The radius is well-known, an Earth-like planet of that radius would have about 14 Earth masses. Neptune-like planets are much less dense than Earth-like planets. A Neptunian planet of that size would have only about 4 Earth masses. It is hard to imagine a planet 2.5 times as
3882:
In the first paragraph, it is stated that Kepler-22b is 600 light years or 180 parsecs away from the earth, but under physical characteristics, it's stated that the planet is 620ly and 190pc away. Both of these statements are cited in the article, but from different sources. I recommend amending the
1783:
It looks like the IP user 24.79.40.48 waffled a bit about how to address apparent OR in the Composition and Structure section. That section does appear to be appropriately labeled; neither of the inline citations in that section contain gravity or density speculation. That being said, unless someone
1117:
transited 3 times, no doubt someone has done some spectroscopy on this planet's atmosphere if it exists and drawn some basic conclusions. It would be very interesting to know if any biosignatures have been detected although possibly NASA would have ruled this out before making the media release. --
2805:
The article says that additional confirmation data was provided by ground based telescopes, but doesn't clarify exactly which method/s were used. Would it be correct in assuming that it is also the transit method based on subsequent transits or was it observed also using another different method ?
2565:
I think citation #7 is wrong. If the object has the same density as earth, its surface gravity would be 2.4G. If it is neptune-like with a density of 1.7 then its 'surface' gravity would be 0.75G. (i.e. as compared to earth, 2.4^3 volume. 2.4 farther away. 1/2.4^2 for 1/r^2 so for same density
776:
There are other strong possible candidates, but they have been harder to confirm. There are also some that have been partially confirmed that are on the edge of the habitable zone (either in or out, but they aren't sure yet). And there is at least one that is tidally locked which does things to the
3410:
Actually I think the blue/green is supposed to reference Uranus and Neptune, as given its size 22b is thought to be a mini-Neptune/waterworld and hence why there are no distinguishable landforms in the image. Unlike those two however Kepler-22b is assumed to have the right environmental conditions
2745:? According to it, a water planet of this size would only have some 4 Earth masses, even lower than the referenced article's value. And the 35 Earth-masses might correspond to an Earth-like composition, according to the slide. But such a massive "terrestrial" planet sounds very dubious to me... -- 2704:
A Neptunian planet would have a low density, so for a fixed radius it would have a low mass. A more earth like ocean planet would have a higher density, so for a fixed radius it would have a higher mass. The referenced article either transposed the numbers or the writer doesn't understand basic
1396:
Also the the calculations are circular in supporting a Second Earth, if the mass is 13 times the mass of the Earth, then it is deceptive to only be multiplying the GHG effect by 1 rather than the full 13, if it is like Earth. This kind of perfect scenario speculation only leads to media hype that
1116:
Various media reports have made mention of atmospheric conditions conducive to live, however I haven't been able to find anything that specifically mentions if an atmosphere has been confirmed for the planet. Certainly being one of the first of its kind identified via the transit method and has
513:
Now take a planet with 10 times the material! Uncompressed density is still 4.4g/cm^3. But all that mass squeezing on top of itself produces serious compression. When you take that into account, the average compressed density of an Earth-like 2.4Re planet is MORE THAN 14G/CM^3, giving a mass of
3310:
Thanks for working on it, but which article has those transit dates? The BJD dates and the 1Oct. 2011 are in the discovery article, but the "cited" May dates aren't. This WP article needs a reliable source for them if they should stay. BTW, the 3rd transit wasn't in Oct. 2011, but in the "2010
1168:
Thanks. I thought as much I certainly wondered how they would make conclusions like surface temperature without details of an atmosphere. Sure the star is cooler than the sun, but it looks to be on the inner edge and assuming that larger more dense planets hold on to thicker atmospheres, and
280:
Too "far"? A fairly relative statement, no less so when it comes to cosmic distances and, I'd say, depends pretty much on your intentions. ;-) 600ly is not that far actually, not to my mind at least, and if it should turn out possible to eventually confirm that this is indeed a rocky planet--I
3244:
I'd like to know more accurate list of transit dates for this object. The current dates mentioned in the article are far too vague (ie 1st - "mid-2009". 3rd - "late 2010"). If the orbital period is 290 days (article also contradicts by claiming 289 on same page), then one should be able to
503:
In fact an Earth-like planet with a radius 2.4 times bigger than Earth should have a mass of around 40 earth masses (definitely not 14). The problem is you simply CANNOT scale planet size with density! What's the density of Earth? 5.5g/cm^3 right? Wrong. Earth's uncompressed density is only
3380:
I believe that this is misleading. It depicts a blue/green planet with clouds much like Earth, although little is actually known of whether there is even an atmosphere and may mislead people into making superficial assumptions about habitability. I propose that it should be replaced by a
2821:
The paper mentions data acquired at the WIYN 3.5m, although the radial velocity data was only an upper limit. The paper is now linked to in the external link sections so you can see for yourself. The secondary sources mentioned nothing beyond "Sptizer and ground based observatories."
901:
We definitely want the primary source, but the secondary sources show that the subject has received commentary, or attention, outside the primary source. Of course, we all know this is highly notable, but WP still requires that we "show our work" just as in science or math
2547:
In citation #7 it suggest that the gavity for the two different types of planets it could be. That is 1.75 for rocky planet and 6.17 for a neptune like planet. Would it be worth noting that is has an estimated gravity range between 1.75-6.17 or is this to early to even
3431:
In the infobox, the mass is marked as .97 Solar Mass, whereas the actual text gives an estimate by the Habitable Exoplanets Catalog which provides a figure of 6.36 earth masses. Someone should check/update the infobox or the text, whichever is is need of more update.
2720:
Thanks for noting. It seems the reference uses "Neptunian" strictly in the sense of "mass similar to Neptune's", so a "Neptunian" needs not be a gas giant. So they apparently made no factual errors, but only used unfortunate wordings. I've tried to fix it in the
1203:
Higher gravity actually increases the likelyhood of a hot planet having liquid water. Venus is supposed to have lost its water after a runaway green house effect. This wouldn't have happened if Venus' gravity was higher. Lookup the "Kombayashi-Ingersoll limit".
3992: 285:
much like Earth at shorter distance. Not least because there simply may not be any. As someone already noted further down, yes, as yet the planetbox is all corrupted, though I'm afraid I can't put this in order myself either. Someone else is wanted. Greetings,
3652:
This template is part of a group of templates that are used to display information about a specific extrasolar planet. Images of published planetary properties are preferred where available, especially when they are available from cited publications.
3080:
There may be a major database that uses it that way, but we should make Knowledge articles on Kepler objects uniform in style, which means not using a space. Please check the other similar articles you started - I suspect you made a mistake.
1169:
possibly have strong magnetospheres, you'd imagine its more likely to be an incredibly hot place like Venus, especially if it is true that tidal acceleration would slow down the length of its days and cause any oceans to boil away. --
3883:
first paragraph to read 620ly, as that statement has more corroborated sources supporting it and also question whether the Brian Dunbar source is entirely accurate. A minor thing, but one that makes us look contradictory and sloppy.
989:
The gravity isn't clear yet, it will depend on the planets density. But even a rocky 2.4 Earth-mass planet could support life as we know it, given the presence of other factors like the right atmosphere and the presence of water.
3204:
There are no "official" rules for when stars or exoplanets qualify to get a proper name (unlike the situation e.g. for minor planets). Since no single exoplanet has received a proper name yet, I doubt this one will get one.
362:
your posts from now on? And, no, to the IP above, I'm afraid my username does not refer to modes of space travel (nor theories thereof), much less so to theories of "faster-than-light" travel. ;) It does however refer to a
2624:
massive article or even an average sized one. The amount of actual data available should be reflected in the article's size and if this means just one paragraph and an infobox, so be it. I just wanted to stress this.
740:
Is this really the first planet in the habitable zone? I thought there were some planets discovered earlier that fit that criteria, yet are unable to support life as we know it for other reasons (as gas giants IIRC).
1035:
I'm trying to find out the rating based on NASA/SETI's new ESI ratings system. Anyone know whether it has a higher score than Gliese 581 d ? If so it would officially be the most similar known planet yet to Earth.
3381:
nondescript ball with a comparison in size to the Earth (and possibly Neptune) similarly to many similar articles and the artists conception should be moved to the "Possible Composition and Structure" section. --
1816:
Yeah, it's sort of a borderline case I could go either way on. As far as astrophysics goes, those are pretty basic calculations, but I think the article would be better served if a cite existed with that info. -
1739:
The article is all quotes from mainstream news articles and online NASA press releases. I don't see anything remotely original. Unless I am missing something, can someone point out where that is? Thanks,
3411:
for particularly bright cloud layers, such as Earth's, to form. So the image is not that bad and about as accurate as can be expected, though perhaps the reality could be misleading to the uninitiated.
1784:
can point me to a guideline that says otherwise, I don't think it's WP practice to put redundant message templates at the top and in the section under question; I'll remove the top template presently. -
3962: 3292:
I have attempted to reconcile these dates in UTC without much success. Though within the article, at least two of the transit dates are explicitly mentioned, though I'm not sure as to which format.--
612:
Can we seriously be using space.com and BBC news as astronomy resources in anything other than an article on media's role popularizing astronomy? -- G. Robert Shiplett 20:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
35: 3117:
In that case a centralized discussion about changing all the article names to reflect your concerns should decide that. However, I don't see consensus on the discussion page you linked. Regards
1132:
As far as I know, atmospheres have only been detected on gas giant transiting planets. The atmospheric signature is too faint to detect for a planet of this size with our current telescopes.
3631: 3630:
The section Orbit states "It has an eccentricity of 0, meaning its orbit is basically circular.", which is not supported by the source and is contradicted in later information on the page.
1015:
13.8 times Earth's. So at Earth's density, it would have the same mass as Uranus! Neither is it expected to be rocky, it's either a small gas giant or (less probable) an ocean planet. --
3260:
The exact dates you added in 2012 ("Dec. 2010, May 2011") blatantly contradict the period claim... Did you just (mis)calculate them yourself, or did you have a (non-mentioned) source? --
2562:
It's not too early to suggest a range of masses and thus gravities. Something that size and dark must be planetary in composition. It must be in the earth-neptune range of densities.
2701:"It has been estimated that it is probably a "Neptunian" gas planet with a mass of ~35 Earth masses, but in the "best case" it could be an ocean world with only some 10 Earth masses." 3095:
I believe you misunderstand the point, which is to be have a style that reflects actual use. As explained, both the IAU and all databases use a space. This has been explained before.
2781:
Well, the slide doesn't say which of the compositions is most likely, which is a useful info from the PHL website IMO. Personally, I would expect Kepler-22b to be a "gas dwarf" like
3952: 389:
Canopus is 300 ly away, while the center of the milky way is 26000ly distant. canopus is a highly visible supergiant. This may give some scale if added to article.(mercurywoodrose)
777:
surface temperatures that we are not able to evaluate yet. So yes, in short, this is the first confirmed planet, with no qualifications or reservations on the part of scientists.
3982: 2649:
Personally I wouldn't sweat it. This happens any time an important scientific discovery is announced. Eventually the dust will settle and the article can be tidied up. Regards,
3967: 3189:
I notice that certain notable exo-bodies get proper names (like Wolf, or Lalande, Crab Nebulae etc...) will Kepler 22b receive one? As it seems that it certainly does qualify.
3145: 2957: 153: 3356:
Added to article, removed unref.ed dates. If I calculated correctly, the sixth transit would have occurred on 3 May 2013, when Kepler was unfortunately in safe mode. --
3149: 2494: 684:
We need to make it where "Kepler 22b" redirects people to this article via the search bar. As of now it only comes up when you type "Kepler-22b" (with the hyphen).
3898:
I've changed the second one to 600ly as all 4 sources connected to the 2 paragraphs surrounding the distance all say 600ly, which remains the publish data by nasa.
2785:
with only some 2 Earth masses, since it's even cooler than 11f (thus being able to hold even more hydrogen). But I haven't seen any source stating that opinion. --
1798:
Yeah, only the sectional OR notice is necessary, or even an inline syn tag. I was waffling waffling on adding a tag there myself. The only thing stopping me was
3987: 3770: 3766: 3752: 3574: 3570: 3556: 2418: 2393: 882:
What is the reason behind using secondary or even tertiary sources, such as space.com, when all information is available on the official Kepler Mission report at
358:
Uh-hu.. like I wrote before: "depends much on intentions". ;) Your try at being funny is acknowledged notwithstanding, whatever it's worth. But why not at least
1802:. I'm pretty sure this goes beyond basic math though in that it involves scientific assumptions regarding density which are not covered by the linked policy. 202:. I also would like to suggest that the artist's conception be moved up, not to primary image status but to the point where it is not just touching the notes. 3839:
all link here (since 2011). Are any of these names recognised? If they are they the text ought to mention them, if not should there be links pointing here?
2941: 3977: 199:
The US Military is funding the Allen Radio Telescope Array to search for signals from Kepler-22. Thought that it might be a useful addition to the page.
172: 143: 74: 3947: 3957: 1254:
The first calculation is incorrect. Volume of a sphere is not approximately r cubed. The volume of a sphere is approximately 4 times r cubed.
411:
We seem to have an estimate of it's size. Can we get a window of the planets mass and therefor density from its orbital period around its star?
1211: 925: 891: 3397: 3225: 2905: 1860: 1236: 1152: 993: 840: 821: 800: 778: 742: 700: 666: 652: 589: 570: 550: 504:
4.4g/cm^3. The other 1.1g/cm^3 is due to the effect of pressure on Earth's interior, effectively squashing everything into a smaller space.
464: 323: 259: 2763:
Yes, that's the slide. The text in the article should be updated to reflect that slide, not the misreported line from the media. Thanks.
3972: 3884: 3433: 3190: 3170: 2268: 1741: 946:
stronger than Earth's) to beings who could be looking right back at us wondering how anything could survive OUTSIDE a planetary ocean.
3738: 2604: 1799: 956: 903: 861: 721: 390: 343: 3748:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
3702: 3635: 2357: 2298: 2250: 1889: 1833: 1766: 1721: 1421: 1398: 1383: 1371: 1318: 1261: 1190: 1885:
Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it a standard chart for all extra-solar planets that are compared to Earth?
2674: 2913: 921: 887: 3942: 3491: 3476: 2965: 1276:
How is this business not original research?? All the calculations need references specific to the planet or should be removed.
412: 222: 114: 69: 3148:
states that either form is acceptable and neither name has particular prominence on Google scholar, I'd like to suggest just
2953: 2901: 1347: 1294: 1052: 986:
I'm sorry that was my fault. I should have quoted the speaker from the article. Kirsten Z Jacob 08:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
479:
It has been estimated that it is probably a "Neptunian" (i.e. mass similar to Neptune) planet with a mass of ~35 Earth masses
2743: 3866: 3844: 3107: 3070: 3055: 2969: 446: 2884:" (space/no-space) - Or - Some Other? - Seems there may be ample examples for the various phrasings - For Example, see " 839:
This would be of interest to both scientists and non scientists, allowing people to know where it is located in the sky.
3813: 2640: 665:
I don't know about bogus sources, but the guy that started this section is using a bogus username (take a closer look).
44: 971:
That was more or less a paraphrase of what the AP article says. I've re-written it into something more sensible now.
603:
I don't think much information is yet available on the star at the moment. Kirsten Z Jacob 08:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
942:
From the article: "At 2.4 times the size of the Earth, the planet may be too large for life to exist on the surface."
3916:(generally the best source for stellar distances) puts the Kepler-22 system at a distance of about 644 light-years. 2436: 3526: 3487: 3472: 1416: 1185: 3678: 3386: 3297: 3250: 2811: 1302: 1174: 1122: 1041: 200: 3769:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3573:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3840: 3361: 3339: 3316: 3276:
This article has the actual three transits used in the confirmation process listed in Barycentric Julian dates.
3265: 3210: 3003: 2790: 2750: 2731: 2582: 2338: 1864: 1362: 1215: 1063: 1020: 593: 574: 554: 468: 327: 263: 3401: 3229: 1240: 1156: 997: 844: 825: 804: 782: 746: 704: 670: 656: 3437: 3194: 3174: 2272: 1745: 3888: 3804: 3730: 3518: 2921: 2684: 2608: 1358: 1298: 960: 907: 865: 534:
External links should not be in the main body of the article, they should all be filed under external links
394: 347: 2361: 1265: 237: 3921: 3726: 3674: 3382: 3293: 3246: 3040: 2827: 2807: 1807: 1170: 1137: 1118: 1101: 1037: 976: 725: 616:
In what way are they "Bogus"? Are they factually incorrect? If not then they're perfectly good sources. --
539: 431: 3903: 3788:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3776: 3612: 3592:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3580: 2768: 2710: 2488: 2302: 2254: 1893: 1837: 1770: 1725: 1720:
For comparison only, not for the article. Until an eccentricity is publish, it is only a guessing game.
1425: 1402: 1387: 1194: 376: 371:, believe it or not. That said, let's better keep it a tad more on topic here--it's not a chat, thanks. 291: 50: 3729:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3517:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3011:"Kepler-22b" is the formatting on the Kepler discoveries website, I think it makes sense to keep this. 535: 3899: 3836: 2459:
Mallama, A.; Wang, D.; Howard, R.A. (2006). "Venus phase function and forward scattering from H2SO4".
1055:, it has an ESI of either 0.64 or 0.79, and is not even among the top ten "Earth similarity" planets: 3547: 3456: 3416: 2925: 2628: 2600: 2553: 2520: 2468: 2333:
In fact, none of the temperatures seems to be supported by either of the sources. Dubious indeed...--
2287: 1856: 1257: 1207: 1056: 952: 796: 765: 717: 689: 460: 359: 339: 245: 3649:
The image in the infobox should not be used as it does not follow the usage guide for the template:
3331:
PS: The three BJD dates are 15 May 2009, 1 March 2010, 15 Dec. 2010 (Univ. Time each) according to
1007:
Kepler-22b does not have only 2.4 Earth masses, even if it has a lower density than Earth. It has a
21: 3832: 3828: 3739:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111022051955/http://www.imcce.fr/en/grandpublic/temps/jour_julien.php
3357: 3335: 3312: 3261: 3206: 3000: 2786: 2746: 2727: 2578: 2334: 2324: 1059: 1016: 621: 416: 226: 177: 1853:
its a long shot to see if it has life on it but lets give it a try. get to work people!!!!!!!!!!
1183:
I agree, Venus-Like is much more likely give the size of the planet. This planet could still be a
486: 2985: 2680: 1822: 1789: 1082: 639: 3773:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3577:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
949:
Certainly, "life as we know it" may not be possible on this world, but life most certainly is.
3789: 3593: 2949: 2675:
http://www.exoplanet.eu/catalog-all.php?&munit=&runit=&punit=&mode=-7&more=
1148:
Not yet, in our lifetime it's very likely we will be able to see the atmosphere, but not yet...
162: 3917: 3862: 3122: 3103: 3086: 3066: 3036: 3016: 2961: 2823: 2263:
I do think Earth's comparable figure should be included. I believe it is 14C from the article
1803: 1133: 1097: 972: 490: 442: 3221:
If it does, I vote for "Krypton", just for the fun of it. It fits the general description. :D
569:
I don't know how to do those, but the constellation, as well as other times, is not showing.
3695: 3664: 3608: 3157: 2893: 2764: 2706: 2654: 2636: 2528: 2476: 1086: 372: 287: 207: 106: 3796: 3742: 3600: 3332: 3026: 3689: 3452: 3412: 2549: 2283: 761: 685: 427: 241: 820:
That would be a great secondary picture (the artists conception should stay at the top).
3169:
It could be made searchable by all of those. I forget how to do it, but there is a way.
2524: 2472: 3755:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3559:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3032: 3029: 2909: 2320: 2267:. Comparison with Earth is I imagine a point of great interest in an article like this 2142: 1967: 617: 3795:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3599:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2316: 3936: 2981: 1818: 1785: 635: 3471:
It is listed here as a "Start Class" article, but that is hardly the case anymore.
322:"Zero Thrust", does that refer to any theories of space travel? Interesting idea... 3857: 3118: 3098: 3082: 3061: 3012: 2973: 2937: 2933: 2698:
This line from the page is misreported in the media and makes no sense whatsoever.
1880: 437: 3486:
It has become a really good article as well. Compliments to whoever did the work.
2532: 2480: 457:
i say its far but might have life on it its worth a shot even if it is too far.
3993:
Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
3762: 3566: 3527:
http://news.discovery.com/space/alien-planet-found-in-habitable-zone-111205.html
3153: 2977: 2650: 2632: 2225: 2054: 203: 1397:
will eventually be proven unwarranted and embarassing, as the presedents show.
523:
I've tried to edit this article twice to explain this and it just gets deleted.
281:
wouldn't run a bet on the premise that we'll ever find an exoplanet presumably
3761:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3722: 3565:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3510: 3051: 2889: 2885: 2782: 2095: 96: 3670:
The habitable zone diagram belongs in the orbit section, not in the infobox.
1090: 857: 793:
This is first planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star (G-type star)
588:
If it has a planet like this, it deserves an article, if only first a stub.
119: 90: 63: 2917: 2315:
These charts are nonsense and should not be used. Please see discussion at
3913: 2673:
Exoplanet has updated it to .21 jupiter radi from .234? Some good news.
1762:- Because it was removed by the time you got here, Here is where it was, 3281:
BJD2454966.69775 +/-0.002182 (three dates cited: 13, 14 & 15 of May)
2352:
the references have to be corrected as they didn't copy over correctly
238:
http://www.space.com/13821-nasa-kepler-alien-planets-habitable-zone.html
2726:
Do you have a link to Boruki's slide? That would be a good source... --
3311:
holiday season", according to the source we have (as well as maths).--
3146:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (astronomical objects)#Extrasolar planets
3854:
These should all be deleted. (All have been nominated for deletion.)
2945: 2897: 364: 1365:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. 1078:"Natalie Batalha, one of the scientists on the poject, speculated" 3925: 3907: 3892: 3871: 3848: 3818: 3707: 3682: 3660:
the size comparisons currently used in GJ 1214 b or Gliese 436 b.
3639: 3620: 3495: 3480: 3460: 3441: 3420: 3405: 3390: 3365: 3343: 3320: 3301: 3269: 3254: 3233: 3214: 3198: 3178: 3163: 3126: 3112: 3090: 3075: 3044: 3020: 3006: 2989: 2831: 2815: 2794: 2772: 2754: 2735: 2714: 2688: 2660: 2612: 2597:
This should be on the newsfeed at the front wiki page --NarlySai
2586: 2557: 2365: 2342: 2328: 2306: 2291: 2276: 2264: 2258: 2087: 1910: 1897: 1868: 1841: 1826: 1811: 1793: 1774: 1749: 1729: 1429: 1406: 1391: 1269: 1244: 1219: 1198: 1178: 1160: 1141: 1126: 1105: 1067: 1045: 1024: 1001: 980: 964: 929: 911: 895: 869: 848: 829: 808: 786: 769: 750: 729: 708: 693: 674: 660: 643: 625: 597: 578: 558: 543: 494: 472: 451: 420: 398: 380: 351: 331: 295: 267: 249: 230: 211: 3656:
Artist's conception, regardless of the source, should be avoided.
2282:
the information to be added quickly as it continues to come out.
2929: 2100: 1921: 368: 2353: 1330: 1277: 651:
Space.com is highly respected and always uses science sources.
15: 312:
Good point! It's not very far to anyone who lives there!  :-)
3532:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
161: 3245:
accurately extrapolate a complete list of transit dates. --
2566:
2.4G. For (1.7/5.5) times the density, 2.4*1.7/5.5=0.75G)
1420:
depending on the eccentricity of orbit, and the atmosphere.
1189:
depending on the eccentricity of orbit, and the atmosphere.
3733:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3521:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
920:
Very well, if it is "The more, the merrier" - so be it. --
2297:
Since no one disagree with two agree votes I will add it.
883: 3743:
http://www.imcce.fr/en/grandpublic/temps/jour_julien.php
2958:
Official Knowledge "Extrasolar Planet" Naming Convention
2577:. (It's now ref. #8.) (And please sign your post(s)!) -- 2511:
Mallama, A. (2007). "The magnitude and albedo of Mars".
3663:
My edits followed these guidelines but were revered by
3514: 3287:
BJD2455546.42440 +/-0.00191 (one date cited: 1 October)
1759: 1354: 3963:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
2078: 1901: 1879:
This chart is copied straight out of the article for
634:
The BBC are an excellent source of science stories.--
336:Yeah it's not to far, I've been there last summer. 3765:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3569:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1433: 760:in the habitable zone, as it says in the article. 2978:Official IAU "Extrasolar Planet" Naming Convention 2319:. Also, 2 of the references don't point anywhere. 3396:I've done so. Feel free to make it look nicer. -- 3054:include a space and this corresponds to the only 2354:http://en.wikipedia.org/Gliese_581_g#Temperatures 430:measurements, which will likely this summer when 2431: 2429: 699:Should probably also have one for Keppler 22b. 3451:is listed as .97 Solar Masses, not the planet. 1235:OK all you garage-lab geniuses, get to work! -- 3751:This message was posted before February 2018. 3555:This message was posted before February 2018. 2454: 2452: 1887:With the relevent values swapped in of course. 1832:the OR tags the calulations had NO references. 3953:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences 2506: 2504: 860:article provides the location in the sky. -- 8: 3983:B-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance 3185:Does it Meet the Criteria for a Proper Name? 2854:Is the Article Title Name best phrased as: " 2493:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 176:, which collaborates on articles related to 118:, which collaborates on articles related to 3968:B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences 3692:, rather then on all of the other pages. -- 2966:Astronomical Naming of "Extrasolar Planets" 3721:I have just modified one external link on 3509:I have just modified one external link on 2406: 2404: 1011:2.4 times Earth's, which corresponds to a 58: 2999:without spaces seems more appropriate. – 1372:Learn how and when to remove this message 1319:Learn how and when to remove this message 584:Article Needed for Parent Star Kepler 22b 3688:I would like if the discussion was held 3667:. I'm opening discussion as to why ... 1308:Relevant discussion may be found on the 2569:Please be skeptical about citation #7. 2417:was invoked but never defined (see the 2392:was invoked but never defined (see the 2375: 60: 19: 2486: 2381: 2379: 2243: 2072: 3988:B-Class Astronomical objects articles 3544:to let others know (documentation at 2574: 7: 3632:2003:6F:8F18:C300:288D:9EA3:B14:94AD 2962:Nomenclature of "Extrasolar Planets" 112:This article is within the scope of 3467:Article is now beyond "Start Class" 2409: 2384: 1875:Equilibrium Temperature comparisons 565:Stat Box (On the right) Has Problem 49:It is of interest to the following 1031:Earth Similarity Index (ESI) score 14: 3978:Mid-importance Astronomy articles 3725:. Please take a moment to review 3513:. Please take a moment to review 3058:on the matter that I'm aware of. 2437:"NASA, Mars: Facts & Figures" 758:confirmed by the Kepler Telescope 3948:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 1335: 1282: 1081:Should be spelled "project". -- 221:Anyone know how far away it is? 173:WikiProject Astronomical objects 99: 89: 62: 29: 20: 3525:Corrected formatting/usage for 148:This article has been rated as 128:Knowledge:WikiProject Astronomy 3958:B-Class level-5 vital articles 131:Template:WikiProject Astronomy 1: 3878:Apparent conflict of sources. 3640:12:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC) 3421:13:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC) 3406:07:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC) 3376:Artists Conception in Infobox 3234:17:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 3215:20:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 3199:19:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 3179:19:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 3164:16:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 3127:15:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 3113:02:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 3091:21:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 3076:18:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 3045:13:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 3021:13:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 3007:03:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2990:23:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 2832:21:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 2816:20:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 2795:19:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2773:02:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2755:00:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2736:00:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2715:16:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 2689:03:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC) 2587:00:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC) 2366:22:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC) 2329:10:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 2307:00:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1898:17:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC) 1842:00:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1775:02:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1414:This planet could still be a 756:It is the first planet to be 170:This article is supported by 3893:03:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC) 3819:00:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC) 3284:BJD2455256.55988 +/-0.001853 2860:" (hyphen/no-space) - Or - " 2661:17:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 2613:16:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 2558:16:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 2533:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07.011 2481:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.12.014 2343:19:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC) 2292:16:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 2277:12:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 2259:07:59, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 2238: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2222: 2217: 2214: 2211: 2208: 2203: 2183: 2162: 2139: 2106: 2099: 2094: 2091: 2086: 2081: 2067: 2064: 2061: 2058: 2051: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2037: 2032: 2012: 1987: 1964: 1927: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1909: 1904: 1827:14:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1812:13:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1794:13:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1750:04:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1730:09:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1436: 1430:08:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1407:08:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1392:07:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1270:23:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1245:01:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1220:06:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1199:08:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1179:01:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1161:00:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1142:21:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1127:21:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1106:21:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1091:14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1074:Small typo - I can't correct 1068:21:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 1046:21:13, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 1025:14:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1002:01:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC) 981:21:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 965:21:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 930:02:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 912:02:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 896:02:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 870:00:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 849:23:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 835:What Constellation is It In? 830:23:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 809:15:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 787:23:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 770:22:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 751:22:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 709:06:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 694:22:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 675:00:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 661:23:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 644:21:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 626:21:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 598:19:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 579:19:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 559:19:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 544:18:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 495:09:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 452:22:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 421:13:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 399:02:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 381:22:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 352:20:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 332:19:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 296:19:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 268:19:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 250:19:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 231:19:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC) 212:23:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC) 3391:05:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 3255:05:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 2968:- AND - an earlier related 2838:Extrasolar Planet Naming: " 2742:PS: Do you mean this slide 1869:14:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 1361:the claims made and adding 730:18:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 473:14:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 367:being momentarily equal to 4009: 3973:B-Class Astronomy articles 3926:21:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC) 3908:06:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC) 3872:12:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 3849:09:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC) 3782:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3718:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3708:11:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC) 3683:09:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC) 3621:17:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC) 3586:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3506:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3461:15:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3442:15:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 3050:Most comprehensive online 3028:and the exoplanet database 2980:- in any case - Enjoy! :) 2878:" (space/hyphen) - Or - " 1735:Original Research? Where?! 154:project's importance scale 3645:Incorrect Planetbox usage 3496:03:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 3481:03:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 2866:" (hyphen/space) - Or - " 169: 147: 84: 57: 3366:13:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC) 3344:20:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 3321:15:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 3302:14:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC) 3270:16:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 2872:" (space/space) - Or - " 1800:this little policy blurb 1291:This article or section 3714:External links modified 3502:External links modified 2668:Exoplanet update radius 2619:Stop The Reckless Edits 2317:Equilibrium_Temperature 1073: 902:class.(mercurywoodrose) 736:First in habitable zone 485:dense as the Earth. -- 258:Yes, it's too far! ;-) 236:About 600 light-years ( 3943:B-Class vital articles 2801:Confirmation process ? 1309: 884:http://kepler.nasa.gov 166: 3488:Cliffswallow-vaulting 3473:Cliffswallow-vaulting 1295:synthesis of material 165: 115:WikiProject Astronomy 36:level-5 vital article 3763:regular verification 3626:Orbit - Eccentricity 3567:regular verification 3240:Actual Transit Dates 2413:The named reference 2388:The named reference 816:Picture of the Star? 178:astronomical objects 75:Astronomical objects 3841:Martin of Sheffield 3753:After February 2018 3557:After February 2018 3536:parameter below to 3025:I'd go with SIMBAD 2956:) - ALSO SEE - the 2940:" - AS WELL AS - " 2525:2007Icar..192..404M 2473:2006Icar..182...10M 1760:"Calculation Notes" 3912:The parallax from 3807:InternetArchiveBot 3758:InternetArchiveBot 3562:InternetArchiveBot 2948:) - AS WELL AS - " 2932:) - AS WELL AS - " 2900:) - AS WELL AS - " 1346:possibly contains 1305:to the main topic. 1299:verifiably mention 1293:possibly contains 434:gets a good look. 167: 134:Astronomy articles 45:content assessment 3869: 3783: 3619: 3587: 3110: 3073: 2970:Naming Discussion 2645: 2631:comment added by 2603:comment added by 2248: 2247: 2077: 2076: 2004:−37 °C to −12 °C 1859:comment added by 1718: 1717: 1382: 1381: 1374: 1348:original research 1329: 1328: 1321: 1260:comment added by 1210:comment added by 1096:Thanks! Fixed. 955:comment added by 938:Too Big For Life? 799:comment added by 720:comment added by 463:comment added by 449: 342:comment added by 192: 191: 188: 187: 184: 183: 4000: 3870: 3861: 3837:Christmas planet 3817: 3808: 3781: 3780: 3759: 3665:User:MarioProtIV 3615: 3614:Talk to my owner 3610: 3585: 3584: 3563: 3551: 3447:The mass of the 3111: 3102: 3074: 3065: 2850:" Or Some Other? 2694:Mass and Density 2644: 2625: 2615: 2537: 2536: 2508: 2499: 2498: 2492: 2484: 2456: 2447: 2446: 2444: 2443: 2433: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2416: 2408: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2391: 2383: 2079: 1953:−83 °F to −49 °F 1951:−64 °C to −45 °C 1902: 1871: 1434: 1377: 1370: 1366: 1363:inline citations 1339: 1338: 1331: 1324: 1317: 1313: 1286: 1285: 1278: 1272: 1222: 967: 811: 732: 475: 450: 441: 354: 136: 135: 132: 129: 126: 109: 107:Astronomy portal 104: 103: 102: 93: 86: 85: 80: 77: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 4008: 4007: 4003: 4002: 4001: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3933: 3932: 3880: 3855: 3826: 3824:"Planet Manley" 3811: 3806: 3774: 3767:have permission 3757: 3731:this simple FaQ 3716: 3705: 3675:EvenGreenerFish 3661: 3657: 3647: 3628: 3618: 3613: 3578: 3571:have permission 3561: 3545: 3519:this simple FaQ 3504: 3469: 3429: 3383:EvenGreenerFish 3378: 3294:EvenGreenerFish 3247:EvenGreenerFish 3242: 3187: 3096: 3059: 2852: 2808:EvenGreenerFish 2803: 2696: 2671: 2626: 2621: 2598: 2595: 2593:Front News Feed 2545: 2540: 2510: 2509: 2502: 2485: 2458: 2457: 2450: 2441: 2439: 2435: 2434: 2427: 2414: 2412: 2410: 2402: 2389: 2387: 2385: 2377: 2373: 2006:−35 °F to 10 °F 2002:236 K to 261 K 1877: 1854: 1737: 1378: 1367: 1352: 1340: 1336: 1325: 1314: 1307: 1297:which does not 1287: 1283: 1255: 1252: 1233: 1212:178.198.224.157 1205: 1171:EvenGreenerFish 1119:EvenGreenerFish 1114: 1076: 1038:EvenGreenerFish 1033: 950: 940: 880: 837: 818: 794: 738: 715: 714:Udnduenimexim 682: 610: 586: 567: 532: 458: 435: 428:radial velocity 409: 337: 219: 197: 133: 130: 127: 124: 123: 105: 100: 98: 78: 72: 43:on Knowledge's 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 4006: 4004: 3996: 3995: 3990: 3985: 3980: 3975: 3970: 3965: 3960: 3955: 3950: 3945: 3935: 3934: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3879: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3825: 3822: 3801: 3800: 3793: 3746: 3745: 3737:Added archive 3715: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3701: 3655: 3651: 3646: 3643: 3627: 3624: 3611: 3605: 3604: 3597: 3530: 3529: 3503: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3468: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3428: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3408: 3398:107.203.16.194 3377: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3358:Roentgenium111 3349: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3336:Roentgenium111 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3313:Roentgenium111 3305: 3304: 3289: 3288: 3285: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3273: 3272: 3262:Roentgenium111 3241: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3226:72.196.104.217 3222: 3218: 3217: 3207:Roentgenium111 3186: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3001:Phoenix B 1of3 2976:) - AND - the 2851: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2802: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2787:Roentgenium111 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2758: 2757: 2747:Roentgenium111 2739: 2738: 2728:Roentgenium111 2723: 2722: 2695: 2692: 2670: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2620: 2617: 2594: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2579:Roentgenium111 2544: 2541: 2539: 2538: 2519:(2): 404–416. 2500: 2448: 2425: 2400: 2374: 2372: 2369: 2356: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2335:Roentgenium111 2310: 2309: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2234: 2231: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2219: 2216: 2213: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2201: 2200: 2198: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2189: 2187: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2171: 2168: 2166: 2164: 2160: 2159: 2157: 2155: 2153: 2151: 2149: 2146: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2124: 2122: 2119: 2117: 2115: 2112: 2110: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2098: 2093: 2090: 2085: 2083: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2060: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2018: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2009: 2007: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1991: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1982: 1980: 1978: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1966: 1962: 1961: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1950: 1949:209 K to 228 K 1947: 1945: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1936: 1933: 1931: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1908: 1906: 1888: 1886: 1884: 1876: 1873: 1861:205.222.248.61 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1736: 1733: 1716: 1715: 1712: 1709: 1706: 1703: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1692: 1689: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1673: 1671: 1669: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1661: 1659: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1585: 1583: 1580: 1579:Semi-Maj. Axis 1577: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1535: 1533: 1531: 1529: 1527: 1525: 1523: 1521: 1519: 1517: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1481: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1468: 1466: 1464: 1462: 1460: 1455: 1453: 1448: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1380: 1379: 1343: 1341: 1334: 1327: 1326: 1290: 1288: 1281: 1251: 1248: 1237:64.134.236.146 1232: 1231:Lets Go There! 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1181: 1153:64.134.236.146 1150: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1060:Roentgenium111 1032: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1017:Roentgenium111 994:64.134.236.146 984: 983: 939: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 915: 914: 879: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 841:64.134.124.157 836: 833: 822:64.134.124.157 817: 814: 813: 812: 801:115.87.233.211 790: 789: 779:64.134.124.157 773: 772: 743:178.190.34.207 737: 734: 712: 711: 701:69.108.160.153 681: 678: 667:64.134.124.157 653:64.134.124.157 649: 648: 647: 646: 629: 628: 609: 606: 605: 604: 590:205.169.70.175 585: 582: 571:205.169.70.175 566: 563: 562: 561: 551:205.169.70.175 531: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 518: 517: 516: 515: 508: 507: 506: 505: 498: 497: 465:205.222.248.61 455: 454: 426:This requires 408: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 384: 383: 324:205.169.70.175 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 314: 313: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 273: 272: 271: 270: 260:205.169.70.175 253: 252: 218: 215: 196: 193: 190: 189: 186: 185: 182: 181: 168: 158: 157: 150:Mid-importance 146: 140: 139: 137: 111: 110: 94: 82: 81: 79:Mid‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4005: 3994: 3991: 3989: 3986: 3984: 3981: 3979: 3976: 3974: 3971: 3969: 3966: 3964: 3961: 3959: 3956: 3954: 3951: 3949: 3946: 3944: 3941: 3940: 3938: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3890: 3886: 3885:103.251.15.64 3877: 3873: 3868: 3864: 3859: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3833:Planet manley 3830: 3829:Planet Manley 3823: 3821: 3820: 3815: 3810: 3809: 3798: 3794: 3791: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3778: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3754: 3749: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3719: 3713: 3709: 3704: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3691: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3671: 3668: 3666: 3658: 3650: 3644: 3642: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3625: 3623: 3622: 3616: 3609: 3602: 3598: 3595: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3582: 3576: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3558: 3553: 3549: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3507: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3434:68.190.33.136 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3409: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3375: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3290: 3286: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3275: 3274: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3220: 3219: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3191:64.134.29.243 3184: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3171:64.134.29.243 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3160: 3155: 3151: 3150:leaving it be 3147: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3109: 3105: 3100: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3072: 3068: 3063: 3057: 3053: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3027: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3005: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2877: 2876: 2871: 2870: 2865: 2864: 2859: 2858: 2849: 2848: 2843: 2842: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2724: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2702: 2699: 2693: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2681:Matthurricane 2677: 2676: 2669: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2618: 2616: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2573:See my reply 2572: 2571: 2570: 2567: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2542: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2496: 2490: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2455: 2453: 2449: 2438: 2432: 2430: 2426: 2420: 2407: 2405: 2401: 2395: 2382: 2380: 2376: 2370: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269:86.184.160.59 2266: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2242: 2227: 2221: 2202: 2194: 2192: 2190: 2188: 2182: 2179: 2176: 2169: 2167: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2154: 2147: 2144: 2138: 2130: 2127: 2120: 2113: 2105: 2102: 2097: 2089: 2080: 2071: 2056: 2050: 2031: 2023: 2021: 2019: 2017: 2011: 2008: 2001: 1994: 1992: 1986: 1983: 1981: 1979: 1972: 1969: 1963: 1955: 1948: 1941: 1934: 1926: 1923: 1918:Gliese 581 g 1912: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1882: 1874: 1872: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1782: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1765: 1761: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1742:129.82.55.209 1734: 1732: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1672: 1670: 1668: 1666: 1664: 1662: 1660: 1658: 1656: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1530: 1528: 1526: 1524: 1522: 1520: 1518: 1516: 1514: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1480: 1478:Eccentricity: 1477: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1467: 1465: 1463: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1418: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1376: 1373: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1350: 1349: 1344:This article 1342: 1333: 1332: 1323: 1320: 1311: 1306: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1289: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1249: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1230: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1182: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1079: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1054: 1051:According to 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 987: 982: 978: 974: 970: 969: 968: 966: 962: 958: 954: 947: 943: 937: 931: 927: 923: 919: 918: 917: 916: 913: 909: 905: 900: 899: 898: 897: 893: 889: 885: 877: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 846: 842: 834: 832: 831: 827: 823: 815: 810: 806: 802: 798: 792: 791: 788: 784: 780: 775: 774: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754: 753: 752: 748: 744: 735: 733: 731: 727: 723: 719: 710: 706: 702: 698: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 679: 677: 676: 672: 668: 663: 662: 658: 654: 645: 641: 637: 633: 632: 631: 630: 627: 623: 619: 615: 614: 613: 608:Bogus sources 607: 602: 601: 600: 599: 595: 591: 583: 581: 580: 576: 572: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 545: 541: 537: 529: 522: 521: 520: 519: 512: 511: 510: 509: 502: 501: 500: 499: 496: 492: 488: 483: 482: 481: 480: 476: 474: 470: 466: 462: 453: 448: 444: 439: 433: 429: 425: 424: 423: 422: 418: 414: 406: 400: 396: 392: 388: 387: 386: 385: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 361: 357: 356: 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 334: 333: 329: 325: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 297: 293: 289: 284: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 269: 265: 261: 257: 256: 255: 254: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234: 233: 232: 228: 224: 216: 214: 213: 209: 205: 201: 195:SETI Research 194: 179: 175: 174: 164: 160: 159: 155: 151: 145: 142: 141: 138: 122:on Knowledge. 121: 117: 116: 108: 97: 95: 92: 88: 87: 83: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 3918:SevenSpheres 3881: 3827: 3805: 3802: 3777:source check 3756: 3750: 3747: 3720: 3717: 3694: 3693: 3672: 3669: 3662: 3654: 3648: 3629: 3606: 3581:source check 3560: 3554: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3531: 3508: 3505: 3470: 3448: 3430: 3427:Mass Section 3379: 3243: 3188: 3158: 3143: 3037:Sailsbystars 2997:"Kepler-22b" 2996: 2938:Gliese 581 g 2934:Gliese 581 d 2880: 2879: 2874: 2873: 2868: 2867: 2862: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2853: 2846: 2845: 2840: 2839: 2824:Sailsbystars 2804: 2703: 2700: 2697: 2678: 2672: 2667: 2655: 2627:— Preceding 2622: 2605:82.42.184.75 2599:— Preceding 2596: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2546: 2516: 2512: 2489:cite journal 2467:(1): 10–22. 2464: 2460: 2440:. Retrieved 2411:Cite error: 2386:Cite error: 2351: 2280: 2262: 2249: 2109:equilibrium 2084:comparisons 1930:equilibrium 1907:comparisons 1881:Gliese 581 g 1878: 1855:— Preceding 1852: 1804:Sailsbystars 1763: 1738: 1719: 1587: 1457: 1450: 1415: 1413: 1368: 1345: 1315: 1292: 1256:— Preceding 1253: 1234: 1206:— Preceding 1184: 1151: 1134:Sailsbystars 1115: 1098:Sailsbystars 1080: 1077: 1034: 1012: 1008: 992: 988: 985: 973:Sailsbystars 957:96.251.20.61 951:— Preceding 948: 944: 941: 904:75.61.141.86 881: 862:98.28.22.128 838: 819: 795:— Preceding 757: 739: 722:69.21.173.46 716:— Preceding 713: 683: 664: 650: 611: 587: 568: 536:Ottawakismet 533: 478: 477: 459:— Preceding 456: 410: 391:75.61.141.86 344:83.11.87.161 338:— Preceding 335: 321: 282: 220: 198: 171: 149: 113: 51:WikiProjects 34: 3900:Lilsharkman 3696:MarioProtIV 3548:Sourcecheck 3449:parent star 3152:. Regards, 2972:(thanks to 2942:Kepler 22-b 2926:Kepler-10 b 2918:Kepler-22 b 2910:Kepler-22 b 2906:UPR Arecibo 2902:Kepler-22 b 2875:Kepler 22-b 2869:Kepler 22 b 2863:Kepler-22 b 2847:Kepler-22 b 2765:Martin Cash 2707:Martin Cash 2358:24.79.38.15 2299:24.79.40.48 2251:24.79.40.48 2226:Bond Albedo 2111:temperature 2082:Temperature 2055:Bond Albedo 1932:temperature 1905:Temperature 1890:24.79.40.48 1834:24.79.40.48 1767:24.79.40.48 1722:24.79.40.48 1622:Irradiance: 1582:Irradiance: 1544:Irradiance: 1422:24.79.40.48 1399:24.79.40.48 1384:24.79.40.48 1262:24.19.55.58 1191:24.79.40.48 680:Redirecting 373:Zero Thrust 288:Zero Thrust 3937:Categories 3814:Report bug 3723:Kepler-22b 3511:Kepler-22b 3453:ChiZeroOne 3413:ChiZeroOne 2995:I believe 2950:Kepler 22b 2894:Kepler-22b 2890:Kepler-16b 2886:Kepler-10b 2881:Kepler 22b 2857:Kepler-22b 2841:Kepler-22b 2783:Kepler-11f 2550:MathewDill 2442:2010-01-28 2371:References 2284:MathewDill 2186:GHG effect 2165:GHG effect 2096:Kepler 22b 2065:0.5 to 0.3 2015:GHG effect 1990:GHG effect 1541:Perihelion 1490:0.01671123 1485:0.01671123 1458:Kepler 22b 1355:improve it 1112:Atmosphere 762:Samcashion 686:Samcashion 242:Samcashion 3797:this tool 3790:this tool 3601:this tool 3594:this tool 3056:statement 3052:databases 2960:- AND - 2419:help page 2394:help page 2321:Q Science 2163:+ Earth's 2135:−88.6 °F 1988:+ Earth's 1960:−88.6 °F 1359:verifying 1310:talk page 1053:this site 858:Kepler-22 618:Hibernian 413:198.2.4.2 407:Mass/size 360:"signing" 223:198.2.4.2 125:Astronomy 120:Astronomy 70:Astronomy 39:is rated 3914:Gaia DR3 3803:Cheers.— 3703:contribs 3607:Cheers.— 2982:Drbogdan 2964:- AND - 2721:article. 2641:contribs 2629:unsigned 2601:unsigned 2548:suggest? 2415:Stephens 2204:Tidally 2140:+ Venus' 2044:Probably 2033:Tidally 1965:+ Venus' 1857:unsigned 1819:Sangrolu 1786:Sangrolu 1714:169.78% 1683:Variance 1619:Aphelion 1612:117.16% 1572:239.11% 1443:Planets: 1417:hellhole 1258:unsigned 1208:unsigned 1186:hellhole 953:unsigned 922:Hatteras 888:Hatteras 797:unsigned 718:unsigned 636:GwydionM 461:unsigned 340:unsigned 217:Distance 3858:Aldaron 3727:my edit 3617::Online 3534:checked 3515:my edit 3119:Hekerui 3099:Aldaron 3083:Hekerui 3062:Aldaron 3033:WP:AINT 3013:Hekerui 2974:Aldaron 2952:" (per 2944:" (per 2936:" and " 2928:" (per 2924:) and " 2920:" (per 2916:) and " 2912:" (per 2908:) and " 2904:" (per 2896:" (per 2892:" and " 2888:" and " 2543:Gravity 2521:Bibcode 2469:Bibcode 2244:Refs. 2223:Global 2199:−81 °F 2184:+ Mars' 2131:206 K 2125:−0.4 °F 2073:Refs. 2052:Global 2028:−81 °F 2013:+ Mars' 1956:206 K 1946:−0.4 °F 1711:101.70% 1686:Ranges: 1650:69.33% 1641:106.27% 1638:110.44% 1635:112.61% 1632:113.34% 1609:117.16% 1606:117.16% 1603:117.16% 1600:117.16% 1597:117.16% 1594:117.16% 1588:100.00% 1569:183.06% 1566:144.64% 1563:129.82% 1560:124.52% 1557:121.99% 1554:121.18% 1549:103.43% 1353:Please 878:Sources 487:Ligneus 438:Aldaron 152:on the 41:B-class 3542:failed 3004:(talk) 2946:Sci Am 2898:SIMBAD 2844:" Or " 2633:KirtZJ 2513:Icarus 2461:Icarus 2236:♦ ?? ♦ 2215:♦ ?? ♦ 2209:Almost 2206:locked 2197:−63 °C 2195:210 K 2177:♦ ?? ♦ 2170:288 K 2152:867 °F 2150:464 °C 2148:737 K 2145:effect 2133:−67 °C 2128:-11 °C 2123:−18 °C 2121:255 K 2116:34 °C 2114:307 K 2107:Global 2092:Earth 2038:Almost 2035:locked 2026:−63 °C 2024:210 K 1995:288 K 1977:867 °F 1975:464 °C 1973:737 K 1970:effect 1958:−67 °C 1944:−18 °C 1942:255 K 1937:34 °C 1935:307 K 1928:Global 1915:Earth 1764:Thanks 1708:47.82% 1705:23.55% 1702:14.08% 1647:81.36% 1644:96.83% 1627:96.74% 1303:relate 1250:Calc 1 1083:nexxai 1013:volume 1009:radius 549:Done. 365:thrust 204:Wer900 47:scale. 3334:...-- 2575:below 2265:Earth 2239:0.25 2174:59 °F 2172:15 °C 2118:93 °F 2088:Venus 2068:0.25 1999:59 °F 1997:15 °C 1939:93 °F 1911:Venus 1699:9.38% 1696:7.84% 1691:6.69% 1451:Earth 530:Links 28:This 3922:talk 3904:talk 3889:talk 3845:talk 3835:and 3690:here 3679:talk 3636:talk 3538:true 3492:talk 3477:talk 3457:talk 3438:talk 3417:talk 3402:talk 3387:talk 3362:talk 3340:talk 3317:talk 3298:talk 3266:talk 3251:talk 3230:talk 3211:talk 3195:talk 3175:talk 3159:talk 3123:talk 3087:talk 3041:talk 3017:talk 2986:talk 2930:NASA 2828:talk 2812:talk 2791:talk 2769:talk 2751:talk 2732:talk 2711:talk 2685:talk 2656:talk 2637:talk 2609:talk 2583:talk 2554:talk 2495:link 2390:Vogt 2362:talk 2339:talk 2325:talk 2303:talk 2288:talk 2273:talk 2255:talk 2233:0.29 2101:Mars 2062:0.29 1922:Mars 1894:talk 1865:talk 1838:talk 1823:talk 1808:talk 1790:talk 1771:talk 1746:talk 1726:talk 1508:0.3 1499:0.05 1496:0.03 1493:0.02 1426:talk 1403:talk 1388:talk 1266:talk 1241:talk 1216:talk 1195:talk 1175:talk 1157:talk 1138:talk 1123:talk 1102:talk 1087:talk 1064:talk 1058:. -- 1042:talk 1021:talk 998:talk 977:talk 961:talk 926:talk 908:talk 892:talk 886:? -- 866:talk 856:The 845:talk 826:talk 805:talk 783:talk 766:talk 747:talk 726:talk 705:talk 690:talk 671:talk 657:talk 640:talk 622:talk 594:talk 575:talk 555:talk 540:talk 491:talk 469:talk 432:Keck 417:talk 395:talk 377:talk 369:zero 348:talk 328:talk 292:talk 264:talk 246:talk 227:talk 208:talk 3771:RfC 3741:to 3575:RfC 3552:). 3540:or 3154:RJH 3144:As 3035:. 2954:CAS 2922:EDE 2914:EPE 2651:RJH 2529:doi 2517:192 2477:doi 2465:182 2230:0.9 2218:No 2143:GHG 2059:0.9 2047:No 1968:GHG 1505:0.2 1502:0.1 1357:by 1301:or 144:Mid 3939:: 3924:) 3906:) 3891:) 3860:• 3856:— 3847:) 3831:, 3784:. 3779:}} 3775:{{ 3706:) 3700:(/ 3681:) 3673:-- 3638:) 3588:. 3583:}} 3579:{{ 3550:}} 3546:{{ 3494:) 3479:) 3459:) 3440:) 3419:) 3404:) 3389:) 3364:) 3342:) 3319:) 3300:) 3268:) 3253:) 3232:) 3224:-- 3213:) 3205:-- 3197:) 3177:) 3162:) 3125:) 3101:• 3097:— 3089:) 3064:• 3060:— 3043:) 3019:) 2988:) 2830:) 2814:) 2806:-- 2793:) 2771:) 2753:) 2734:) 2713:) 2687:) 2679:-- 2659:) 2643:) 2639:• 2611:) 2585:) 2556:) 2527:. 2515:. 2503:^ 2491:}} 2487:{{ 2475:. 2463:. 2451:^ 2428:^ 2421:). 2403:^ 2396:). 2378:^ 2364:) 2341:) 2327:) 2305:) 2290:) 2275:) 2257:) 2212:No 2041:No 1896:) 1883:. 1867:) 1840:) 1825:) 1810:) 1792:) 1773:) 1748:) 1728:) 1428:) 1405:) 1390:) 1268:) 1243:) 1218:) 1197:) 1177:) 1159:) 1140:) 1125:) 1104:) 1089:) 1066:) 1044:) 1036:-- 1023:) 1000:) 979:) 963:) 928:) 910:) 894:) 868:) 847:) 828:) 807:) 785:) 768:) 749:) 728:) 707:) 692:) 673:) 659:) 642:) 624:) 596:) 577:) 557:) 542:) 493:) 471:) 440:• 436:— 419:) 397:) 379:) 350:) 330:) 294:) 283:so 266:) 248:) 240:) 229:) 210:) 73:: 3920:( 3902:( 3887:( 3867:C 3865:/ 3863:T 3843:( 3816:) 3812:( 3799:. 3792:. 3677:( 3634:( 3603:. 3596:. 3490:( 3475:( 3455:( 3436:( 3415:( 3400:( 3385:( 3360:( 3338:( 3315:( 3296:( 3264:( 3249:( 3228:( 3209:( 3193:( 3173:( 3156:( 3121:( 3108:C 3106:/ 3104:T 3085:( 3071:C 3069:/ 3067:T 3039:( 3015:( 2984:( 2826:( 2810:( 2789:( 2767:( 2749:( 2730:( 2709:( 2683:( 2653:( 2635:( 2607:( 2581:( 2552:( 2535:. 2531:: 2523:: 2497:) 2483:. 2479:: 2471:: 2445:. 2360:( 2337:( 2323:( 2301:( 2286:( 2271:( 2253:( 1892:( 1863:( 1836:( 1821:( 1806:( 1788:( 1769:( 1744:( 1724:( 1424:( 1401:( 1386:( 1375:) 1369:( 1351:. 1322:) 1316:( 1312:. 1264:( 1239:( 1214:( 1193:( 1173:( 1155:( 1136:( 1121:( 1100:( 1085:( 1062:( 1040:( 1019:( 996:( 975:( 959:( 924:( 906:( 890:( 864:( 843:( 824:( 803:( 781:( 764:( 745:( 724:( 703:( 688:( 669:( 655:( 638:( 620:( 592:( 573:( 553:( 538:( 489:( 467:( 447:C 445:/ 443:T 415:( 393:( 375:( 346:( 326:( 290:( 262:( 244:( 225:( 206:( 180:. 156:. 53::

Index


level-5 vital article
content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Astronomy
Astronomical objects
WikiProject icon
Astronomy portal
WikiProject Astronomy
Astronomy
Mid
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Astronomical objects
astronomical objects

Wer900
talk
23:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
198.2.4.2
talk
19:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
http://www.space.com/13821-nasa-kepler-alien-planets-habitable-zone.html
Samcashion
talk
19:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
205.169.70.175
talk
19:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.