31:
163:
91:
64:
514:~40Me. Not only do we know Kepler-22b cannot have a mass of ~40Me (through radial velocity), this is much greater than the mass required for a planet to start accreted hydrogen from the stellar disc (10Me), so what is most likely is a ~10Me rocky core and a 5-10Me Hydrogen envelope. That makes it a totally inhospitable, completely uninhabitable Neptune-like planet. Don't get sucked in by the NASA media hype.
2705:
math. If you watch Bill Boruki's presentation at the Kepler
Science Conference he shows a slide presenting the different composition possibilities for Kepler-22b. You can see from the slide that a higher mass planet would be a denser more ocean like planet. I tried to correct this error in the article, but someone reverted it. This should be fixed, since it is an obvious error in the referenced article.
1284:
1337:
22:
101:
3031:, which are pretty close to the final word in these matters. Except apparently they disagree. The Kepler-22 part seems to be pretty standard, but as to whether the b gets a space or not there does not seem to be a single answer. Argh! For now I think we should just leave the title be and go with the mantra of
3659:
Examples of acceptable images include * direct images, such as one used for GJ 758 b, in the rare cases where these are available; * output of a model that is integral to a cited paper, such as the image used in HD 80606 b; * user-generated images that clearly illustrate published properties, such as
3049:
The general question of whether there should be a space between the star number and the planet letter has been the subject of much past discussion, both are used in the literature, where the decision is generally a matter of a given publisher's editorial policy, and not one of established guidelines.
2623:
Okay everyone. Firstly, there is not enough information currently available about the planet. Secondly, too much information is being added which is either irrelevant or repetitive then being removed by one
Wikipedian, whilst being reverted by another. This has got to stop. This shouldn't be the most
2281:
I would also have to agree with this. Thing that makes this planet have such hype about it and a reason we are all here making edits is the fact that it is comparable to earth. I think it important to have an easy chart like this to allow us to see the details quick and easy. Also it allows a spot of
1831:
Millions of precedents speak for OR being completely removed. Astrophysics calculations are not BASIC to the general public. I could show you all kinds of RELEVANT math and no one would want it in the article if they disagree with what it says about their special planet. AND at the time that I posted
945:
This sentence should be reworked. Is the author saying that life supporting planets have a size/mass limit? Or is s/he referring to gravity in relation to Earth? Life can be anything from single cell microbes (which, floating in a vast planetary ocean, wouldn't be too bothered by gravity a few times
484:
This seems very unlikely. The radius is well-known, an Earth-like planet of that radius would have about 14 Earth masses. Neptune-like planets are much less dense than Earth-like planets. A Neptunian planet of that size would have only about 4 Earth masses. It is hard to imagine a planet 2.5 times as
3882:
In the first paragraph, it is stated that Kepler-22b is 600 light years or 180 parsecs away from the earth, but under physical characteristics, it's stated that the planet is 620ly and 190pc away. Both of these statements are cited in the article, but from different sources. I recommend amending the
1783:
It looks like the IP user 24.79.40.48 waffled a bit about how to address apparent OR in the
Composition and Structure section. That section does appear to be appropriately labeled; neither of the inline citations in that section contain gravity or density speculation. That being said, unless someone
1117:
transited 3 times, no doubt someone has done some spectroscopy on this planet's atmosphere if it exists and drawn some basic conclusions. It would be very interesting to know if any biosignatures have been detected although possibly NASA would have ruled this out before making the media release. --
2805:
The article says that additional confirmation data was provided by ground based telescopes, but doesn't clarify exactly which method/s were used. Would it be correct in assuming that it is also the transit method based on subsequent transits or was it observed also using another different method ?
2565:
I think citation #7 is wrong. If the object has the same density as earth, its surface gravity would be 2.4G. If it is neptune-like with a density of 1.7 then its 'surface' gravity would be 0.75G. (i.e. as compared to earth, 2.4^3 volume. 2.4 farther away. 1/2.4^2 for 1/r^2 so for same density
776:
There are other strong possible candidates, but they have been harder to confirm. There are also some that have been partially confirmed that are on the edge of the habitable zone (either in or out, but they aren't sure yet). And there is at least one that is tidally locked which does things to the
3410:
Actually I think the blue/green is supposed to reference Uranus and
Neptune, as given its size 22b is thought to be a mini-Neptune/waterworld and hence why there are no distinguishable landforms in the image. Unlike those two however Kepler-22b is assumed to have the right environmental conditions
2745:? According to it, a water planet of this size would only have some 4 Earth masses, even lower than the referenced article's value. And the 35 Earth-masses might correspond to an Earth-like composition, according to the slide. But such a massive "terrestrial" planet sounds very dubious to me... --
2704:
A Neptunian planet would have a low density, so for a fixed radius it would have a low mass. A more earth like ocean planet would have a higher density, so for a fixed radius it would have a higher mass. The referenced article either transposed the numbers or the writer doesn't understand basic
1396:
Also the the calculations are circular in supporting a Second Earth, if the mass is 13 times the mass of the Earth, then it is deceptive to only be multiplying the GHG effect by 1 rather than the full 13, if it is like Earth. This kind of perfect scenario speculation only leads to media hype that
1116:
Various media reports have made mention of atmospheric conditions conducive to live, however I haven't been able to find anything that specifically mentions if an atmosphere has been confirmed for the planet. Certainly being one of the first of its kind identified via the transit method and has
513:
Now take a planet with 10 times the material! Uncompressed density is still 4.4g/cm^3. But all that mass squeezing on top of itself produces serious compression. When you take that into account, the average compressed density of an Earth-like 2.4Re planet is MORE THAN 14G/CM^3, giving a mass of
3310:
Thanks for working on it, but which article has those transit dates? The BJD dates and the 1Oct. 2011 are in the discovery article, but the "cited" May dates aren't. This WP article needs a reliable source for them if they should stay. BTW, the 3rd transit wasn't in Oct. 2011, but in the "2010
1168:
Thanks. I thought as much I certainly wondered how they would make conclusions like surface temperature without details of an atmosphere. Sure the star is cooler than the sun, but it looks to be on the inner edge and assuming that larger more dense planets hold on to thicker atmospheres, and
280:
Too "far"? A fairly relative statement, no less so when it comes to cosmic distances and, I'd say, depends pretty much on your intentions. ;-) 600ly is not that far actually, not to my mind at least, and if it should turn out possible to eventually confirm that this is indeed a rocky planet--I
3244:
I'd like to know more accurate list of transit dates for this object. The current dates mentioned in the article are far too vague (ie 1st - "mid-2009". 3rd - "late 2010"). If the orbital period is 290 days (article also contradicts by claiming 289 on same page), then one should be able to
503:
In fact an Earth-like planet with a radius 2.4 times bigger than Earth should have a mass of around 40 earth masses (definitely not 14). The problem is you simply CANNOT scale planet size with density! What's the density of Earth? 5.5g/cm^3 right? Wrong. Earth's uncompressed density is only
3380:
I believe that this is misleading. It depicts a blue/green planet with clouds much like Earth, although little is actually known of whether there is even an atmosphere and may mislead people into making superficial assumptions about habitability. I propose that it should be replaced by a
2821:
The paper mentions data acquired at the WIYN 3.5m, although the radial velocity data was only an upper limit. The paper is now linked to in the external link sections so you can see for yourself. The secondary sources mentioned nothing beyond "Sptizer and ground based observatories."
901:
We definitely want the primary source, but the secondary sources show that the subject has received commentary, or attention, outside the primary source. Of course, we all know this is highly notable, but WP still requires that we "show our work" just as in science or math
2547:
In citation #7 it suggest that the gavity for the two different types of planets it could be. That is 1.75 for rocky planet and 6.17 for a neptune like planet. Would it be worth noting that is has an estimated gravity range between 1.75-6.17 or is this to early to even
3431:
In the infobox, the mass is marked as .97 Solar Mass, whereas the actual text gives an estimate by the
Habitable Exoplanets Catalog which provides a figure of 6.36 earth masses. Someone should check/update the infobox or the text, whichever is is need of more update.
2720:
Thanks for noting. It seems the reference uses "Neptunian" strictly in the sense of "mass similar to
Neptune's", so a "Neptunian" needs not be a gas giant. So they apparently made no factual errors, but only used unfortunate wordings. I've tried to fix it in the
1203:
Higher gravity actually increases the likelyhood of a hot planet having liquid water. Venus is supposed to have lost its water after a runaway green house effect. This wouldn't have happened if Venus' gravity was higher. Lookup the "Kombayashi-Ingersoll limit".
3992:
285:
much like Earth at shorter distance. Not least because there simply may not be any. As someone already noted further down, yes, as yet the planetbox is all corrupted, though I'm afraid I can't put this in order myself either. Someone else is wanted. Greetings,
3652:
This template is part of a group of templates that are used to display information about a specific extrasolar planet. Images of published planetary properties are preferred where available, especially when they are available from cited publications.
3080:
There may be a major database that uses it that way, but we should make
Knowledge articles on Kepler objects uniform in style, which means not using a space. Please check the other similar articles you started - I suspect you made a mistake.
1169:
possibly have strong magnetospheres, you'd imagine its more likely to be an incredibly hot place like Venus, especially if it is true that tidal acceleration would slow down the length of its days and cause any oceans to boil away. --
3883:
first paragraph to read 620ly, as that statement has more corroborated sources supporting it and also question whether the Brian Dunbar source is entirely accurate. A minor thing, but one that makes us look contradictory and sloppy.
989:
The gravity isn't clear yet, it will depend on the planets density. But even a rocky 2.4 Earth-mass planet could support life as we know it, given the presence of other factors like the right atmosphere and the presence of water.
3204:
There are no "official" rules for when stars or exoplanets qualify to get a proper name (unlike the situation e.g. for minor planets). Since no single exoplanet has received a proper name yet, I doubt this one will get one.
362:
your posts from now on? And, no, to the IP above, I'm afraid my username does not refer to modes of space travel (nor theories thereof), much less so to theories of "faster-than-light" travel. ;) It does however refer to a
2624:
massive article or even an average sized one. The amount of actual data available should be reflected in the article's size and if this means just one paragraph and an infobox, so be it. I just wanted to stress this.
740:
Is this really the first planet in the habitable zone? I thought there were some planets discovered earlier that fit that criteria, yet are unable to support life as we know it for other reasons (as gas giants IIRC).
1035:
I'm trying to find out the rating based on NASA/SETI's new ESI ratings system. Anyone know whether it has a higher score than Gliese 581 d ? If so it would officially be the most similar known planet yet to Earth.
3381:
nondescript ball with a comparison in size to the Earth (and possibly
Neptune) similarly to many similar articles and the artists conception should be moved to the "Possible Composition and Structure" section. --
1816:
Yeah, it's sort of a borderline case I could go either way on. As far as astrophysics goes, those are pretty basic calculations, but I think the article would be better served if a cite existed with that info. -
1739:
The article is all quotes from mainstream news articles and online NASA press releases. I don't see anything remotely original. Unless I am missing something, can someone point out where that is? Thanks,
3411:
for particularly bright cloud layers, such as Earth's, to form. So the image is not that bad and about as accurate as can be expected, though perhaps the reality could be misleading to the uninitiated.
1784:
can point me to a guideline that says otherwise, I don't think it's WP practice to put redundant message templates at the top and in the section under question; I'll remove the top template presently. -
3962:
3292:
I have attempted to reconcile these dates in UTC without much success. Though within the article, at least two of the transit dates are explicitly mentioned, though I'm not sure as to which format.--
612:
Can we seriously be using space.com and BBC news as astronomy resources in anything other than an article on media's role popularizing astronomy? -- G. Robert
Shiplett 20:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
35:
3117:
In that case a centralized discussion about changing all the article names to reflect your concerns should decide that. However, I don't see consensus on the discussion page you linked. Regards
1132:
As far as I know, atmospheres have only been detected on gas giant transiting planets. The atmospheric signature is too faint to detect for a planet of this size with our current telescopes.
3631:
3630:
The section Orbit states "It has an eccentricity of 0, meaning its orbit is basically circular.", which is not supported by the source and is contradicted in later information on the page.
1015:
13.8 times Earth's. So at Earth's density, it would have the same mass as Uranus! Neither is it expected to be rocky, it's either a small gas giant or (less probable) an ocean planet. --
3260:
The exact dates you added in 2012 ("Dec. 2010, May 2011") blatantly contradict the period claim... Did you just (mis)calculate them yourself, or did you have a (non-mentioned) source? --
2562:
It's not too early to suggest a range of masses and thus gravities. Something that size and dark must be planetary in composition. It must be in the earth-neptune range of densities.
2701:"It has been estimated that it is probably a "Neptunian" gas planet with a mass of ~35 Earth masses, but in the "best case" it could be an ocean world with only some 10 Earth masses."
3095:
I believe you misunderstand the point, which is to be have a style that reflects actual use. As explained, both the IAU and all databases use a space. This has been explained before.
2781:
Well, the slide doesn't say which of the compositions is most likely, which is a useful info from the PHL website IMO. Personally, I would expect Kepler-22b to be a "gas dwarf" like
3952:
389:
Canopus is 300 ly away, while the center of the milky way is 26000ly distant. canopus is a highly visible supergiant. This may give some scale if added to article.(mercurywoodrose)
777:
surface temperatures that we are not able to evaluate yet. So yes, in short, this is the first confirmed planet, with no qualifications or reservations on the part of scientists.
3982:
2649:
Personally I wouldn't sweat it. This happens any time an important scientific discovery is announced. Eventually the dust will settle and the article can be tidied up. Regards,
3967:
3189:
I notice that certain notable exo-bodies get proper names (like Wolf, or
Lalande, Crab Nebulae etc...) will Kepler 22b receive one? As it seems that it certainly does qualify.
3145:
2957:
153:
3356:
Added to article, removed unref.ed dates. If I calculated correctly, the sixth transit would have occurred on 3 May 2013, when Kepler was unfortunately in safe mode. --
3149:
2494:
684:
We need to make it where "Kepler 22b" redirects people to this article via the search bar. As of now it only comes up when you type "Kepler-22b" (with the hyphen).
3898:
I've changed the second one to 600ly as all 4 sources connected to the 2 paragraphs surrounding the distance all say 600ly, which remains the publish data by nasa.
2785:
with only some 2 Earth masses, since it's even cooler than 11f (thus being able to hold even more hydrogen). But I haven't seen any source stating that opinion. --
1798:
Yeah, only the sectional OR notice is necessary, or even an inline syn tag. I was waffling waffling on adding a tag there myself. The only thing stopping me was
3987:
3770:
3766:
3752:
3574:
3570:
3556:
2418:
2393:
882:
What is the reason behind using secondary or even tertiary sources, such as space.com, when all information is available on the official Kepler Mission report at
358:
Uh-hu.. like I wrote before: "depends much on intentions". ;) Your try at being funny is acknowledged notwithstanding, whatever it's worth. But why not at least
1802:. I'm pretty sure this goes beyond basic math though in that it involves scientific assumptions regarding density which are not covered by the linked policy.
202:. I also would like to suggest that the artist's conception be moved up, not to primary image status but to the point where it is not just touching the notes.
3839:
all link here (since 2011). Are any of these names recognised? If they are they the text ought to mention them, if not should there be links pointing here?
2941:
3977:
199:
The US Military is funding the Allen Radio Telescope Array to search for signals from Kepler-22. Thought that it might be a useful addition to the page.
172:
143:
74:
3947:
3957:
1254:
The first calculation is incorrect. Volume of a sphere is not approximately r cubed. The volume of a sphere is approximately 4 times r cubed.
411:
We seem to have an estimate of it's size. Can we get a window of the planets mass and therefor density from its orbital period around its star?
1211:
925:
891:
3397:
3225:
2905:
1860:
1236:
1152:
993:
840:
821:
800:
778:
742:
700:
666:
652:
589:
570:
550:
504:
4.4g/cm^3. The other 1.1g/cm^3 is due to the effect of pressure on Earth's interior, effectively squashing everything into a smaller space.
464:
323:
259:
2763:
Yes, that's the slide. The text in the article should be updated to reflect that slide, not the misreported line from the media. Thanks.
3972:
3884:
3433:
3190:
3170:
2268:
1741:
946:
stronger than Earth's) to beings who could be looking right back at us wondering how anything could survive OUTSIDE a planetary ocean.
3738:
2604:
1799:
956:
903:
861:
721:
390:
343:
3748:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
3702:
3635:
2357:
2298:
2250:
1889:
1833:
1766:
1721:
1421:
1398:
1383:
1371:
1318:
1261:
1190:
1885:
Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to make it a standard chart for all extra-solar planets that are compared to Earth?
2674:
2913:
921:
887:
3942:
3491:
3476:
2965:
1276:
How is this business not original research?? All the calculations need references specific to the planet or should be removed.
412:
222:
114:
69:
3148:
states that either form is acceptable and neither name has particular prominence on Google scholar, I'd like to suggest just
2953:
2901:
1347:
1294:
1052:
986:
I'm sorry that was my fault. I should have quoted the speaker from the article. Kirsten Z Jacob 08:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
479:
It has been estimated that it is probably a "Neptunian" (i.e. mass similar to Neptune) planet with a mass of ~35 Earth masses
2743:
3866:
3844:
3107:
3070:
3055:
2969:
446:
2884:" (space/no-space) - Or - Some Other? - Seems there may be ample examples for the various phrasings - For Example, see "
839:
This would be of interest to both scientists and non scientists, allowing people to know where it is located in the sky.
3813:
2640:
665:
I don't know about bogus sources, but the guy that started this section is using a bogus username (take a closer look).
44:
971:
That was more or less a paraphrase of what the AP article says. I've re-written it into something more sensible now.
603:
I don't think much information is yet available on the star at the moment. Kirsten Z Jacob 08:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
942:
From the article: "At 2.4 times the size of the Earth, the planet may be too large for life to exist on the surface."
3916:(generally the best source for stellar distances) puts the Kepler-22 system at a distance of about 644 light-years.
2436:
3526:
3487:
3472:
1416:
1185:
3678:
3386:
3297:
3250:
2811:
1302:
1174:
1122:
1041:
200:
3769:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3573:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
3840:
3361:
3339:
3316:
3276:
This article has the actual three transits used in the confirmation process listed in Barycentric Julian dates.
3265:
3210:
3003:
2790:
2750:
2731:
2582:
2338:
1864:
1362:
1215:
1063:
1020:
593:
574:
554:
468:
327:
263:
3401:
3229:
1240:
1156:
997:
844:
825:
804:
782:
746:
704:
670:
656:
3437:
3194:
3174:
2272:
1745:
3888:
3804:
3730:
3518:
2921:
2684:
2608:
1358:
1298:
960:
907:
865:
534:
External links should not be in the main body of the article, they should all be filed under external links
394:
347:
2361:
1265:
237:
3921:
3726:
3674:
3382:
3293:
3246:
3040:
2827:
2807:
1807:
1170:
1137:
1118:
1101:
1037:
976:
725:
616:
In what way are they "Bogus"? Are they factually incorrect? If not then they're perfectly good sources. --
539:
431:
3903:
3788:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3776:
3612:
3592:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3580:
2768:
2710:
2488:
2302:
2254:
1893:
1837:
1770:
1725:
1720:
For comparison only, not for the article. Until an eccentricity is publish, it is only a guessing game.
1425:
1402:
1387:
1194:
376:
371:, believe it or not. That said, let's better keep it a tad more on topic here--it's not a chat, thanks.
291:
50:
3729:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3517:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
3011:"Kepler-22b" is the formatting on the Kepler discoveries website, I think it makes sense to keep this.
535:
3899:
3836:
2459:
Mallama, A.; Wang, D.; Howard, R.A. (2006). "Venus phase function and forward scattering from H2SO4".
1055:, it has an ESI of either 0.64 or 0.79, and is not even among the top ten "Earth similarity" planets:
3547:
3456:
3416:
2925:
2628:
2600:
2553:
2520:
2468:
2333:
In fact, none of the temperatures seems to be supported by either of the sources. Dubious indeed...--
2287:
1856:
1257:
1207:
1056:
952:
796:
765:
717:
689:
460:
359:
339:
245:
3649:
The image in the infobox should not be used as it does not follow the usage guide for the template:
3331:
PS: The three BJD dates are 15 May 2009, 1 March 2010, 15 Dec. 2010 (Univ. Time each) according to
1007:
Kepler-22b does not have only 2.4 Earth masses, even if it has a lower density than Earth. It has a
21:
3832:
3828:
3739:
https://web.archive.org/web/20111022051955/http://www.imcce.fr/en/grandpublic/temps/jour_julien.php
3357:
3335:
3312:
3261:
3206:
3000:
2786:
2746:
2727:
2578:
2334:
2324:
1059:
1016:
621:
416:
226:
177:
1853:
its a long shot to see if it has life on it but lets give it a try. get to work people!!!!!!!!!!
1183:
I agree, Venus-Like is much more likely give the size of the planet. This planet could still be a
486:
2985:
2680:
1822:
1789:
1082:
639:
3773:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3577:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
949:
Certainly, "life as we know it" may not be possible on this world, but life most certainly is.
3789:
3593:
2949:
2675:
http://www.exoplanet.eu/catalog-all.php?&munit=&runit=&punit=&mode=-7&more=
1148:
Not yet, in our lifetime it's very likely we will be able to see the atmosphere, but not yet...
162:
3917:
3862:
3122:
3103:
3086:
3066:
3036:
3016:
2961:
2823:
2263:
I do think Earth's comparable figure should be included. I believe it is 14C from the article
1803:
1133:
1097:
972:
490:
442:
3221:
If it does, I vote for "Krypton", just for the fun of it. It fits the general description. :D
569:
I don't know how to do those, but the constellation, as well as other times, is not showing.
3695:
3664:
3608:
3157:
2893:
2764:
2706:
2654:
2636:
2528:
2476:
1086:
372:
287:
207:
106:
3796:
3742:
3600:
3332:
3026:
3689:
3452:
3412:
2549:
2283:
761:
685:
427:
241:
820:
That would be a great secondary picture (the artists conception should stay at the top).
3169:
It could be made searchable by all of those. I forget how to do it, but there is a way.
2524:
2472:
3755:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
3559:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
3032:
3029:
2909:
2320:
2267:. Comparison with Earth is I imagine a point of great interest in an article like this
2142:
1967:
617:
3795:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3599:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2316:
3936:
2981:
1818:
1785:
635:
3471:
It is listed here as a "Start Class" article, but that is hardly the case anymore.
322:"Zero Thrust", does that refer to any theories of space travel? Interesting idea...
3857:
3118:
3098:
3082:
3061:
3012:
2973:
2937:
2933:
2698:
This line from the page is misreported in the media and makes no sense whatsoever.
1880:
437:
3486:
It has become a really good article as well. Compliments to whoever did the work.
2532:
2480:
457:
i say its far but might have life on it its worth a shot even if it is too far.
3993:
Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
3762:
3566:
3527:
http://news.discovery.com/space/alien-planet-found-in-habitable-zone-111205.html
3153:
2977:
2650:
2632:
2225:
2054:
203:
1397:
will eventually be proven unwarranted and embarassing, as the presedents show.
523:
I've tried to edit this article twice to explain this and it just gets deleted.
281:
wouldn't run a bet on the premise that we'll ever find an exoplanet presumably
3761:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
3722:
3565:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
3510:
3051:
2889:
2885:
2782:
2095:
96:
3670:
The habitable zone diagram belongs in the orbit section, not in the infobox.
1090:
857:
793:
This is first planet in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star (G-type star)
588:
If it has a planet like this, it deserves an article, if only first a stub.
119:
90:
63:
2917:
2315:
These charts are nonsense and should not be used. Please see discussion at
3913:
2673:
Exoplanet has updated it to .21 jupiter radi from .234? Some good news.
1762:- Because it was removed by the time you got here, Here is where it was,
3281:
BJD2454966.69775 +/-0.002182 (three dates cited: 13, 14 & 15 of May)
2352:
the references have to be corrected as they didn't copy over correctly
238:
http://www.space.com/13821-nasa-kepler-alien-planets-habitable-zone.html
2726:
Do you have a link to Boruki's slide? That would be a good source... --
3311:
holiday season", according to the source we have (as well as maths).--
3146:
Knowledge:Naming conventions (astronomical objects)#Extrasolar planets
3854:
These should all be deleted. (All have been nominated for deletion.)
2945:
2897:
364:
1365:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
1078:"Natalie Batalha, one of the scientists on the poject, speculated"
3925:
3907:
3892:
3871:
3848:
3818:
3707:
3682:
3660:
the size comparisons currently used in GJ 1214 b or Gliese 436 b.
3639:
3620:
3495:
3480:
3460:
3441:
3420:
3405:
3390:
3365:
3343:
3320:
3301:
3269:
3254:
3233:
3214:
3198:
3178:
3163:
3126:
3112:
3090:
3075:
3044:
3020:
3006:
2989:
2831:
2815:
2794:
2772:
2754:
2735:
2714:
2688:
2660:
2612:
2597:
This should be on the newsfeed at the front wiki page --NarlySai
2586:
2557:
2365:
2342:
2328:
2306:
2291:
2276:
2264:
2258:
2087:
1910:
1897:
1868:
1841:
1826:
1811:
1793:
1774:
1749:
1729:
1429:
1406:
1391:
1269:
1244:
1219:
1198:
1178:
1160:
1141:
1126:
1105:
1067:
1045:
1024:
1001:
980:
964:
929:
911:
895:
869:
848:
829:
808:
786:
769:
750:
729:
708:
693:
674:
660:
643:
625:
597:
578:
558:
543:
494:
472:
451:
420:
398:
380:
351:
331:
295:
267:
249:
230:
211:
3656:
Artist's conception, regardless of the source, should be avoided.
2282:
the information to be added quickly as it continues to come out.
2929:
2100:
1921:
368:
2353:
1330:
1277:
651:
Space.com is highly respected and always uses science sources.
15:
312:
Good point! It's not very far to anyone who lives there! :-)
3532:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
161:
3245:
accurately extrapolate a complete list of transit dates. --
2566:
2.4G. For (1.7/5.5) times the density, 2.4*1.7/5.5=0.75G)
1420:
depending on the eccentricity of orbit, and the atmosphere.
1189:
depending on the eccentricity of orbit, and the atmosphere.
3733:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
3521:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
920:
Very well, if it is "The more, the merrier" - so be it. --
2297:
Since no one disagree with two agree votes I will add it.
883:
3743:
http://www.imcce.fr/en/grandpublic/temps/jour_julien.php
2958:
Official Knowledge "Extrasolar Planet" Naming Convention
2577:. (It's now ref. #8.) (And please sign your post(s)!) --
2511:
Mallama, A. (2007). "The magnitude and albedo of Mars".
3663:
My edits followed these guidelines but were revered by
3514:
3287:
BJD2455546.42440 +/-0.00191 (one date cited: 1 October)
1759:
1354:
3963:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
2078:
1901:
1879:
This chart is copied straight out of the article for
634:
The BBC are an excellent source of science stories.--
336:Yeah it's not to far, I've been there last summer.
3765:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
3569:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1433:
760:in the habitable zone, as it says in the article.
2978:Official IAU "Extrasolar Planet" Naming Convention
2319:. Also, 2 of the references don't point anywhere.
3396:I've done so. Feel free to make it look nicer. --
3054:include a space and this corresponds to the only
2354:http://en.wikipedia.org/Gliese_581_g#Temperatures
430:measurements, which will likely this summer when
2431:
2429:
699:Should probably also have one for Keppler 22b.
3451:is listed as .97 Solar Masses, not the planet.
1235:OK all you garage-lab geniuses, get to work! --
3751:This message was posted before February 2018.
3555:This message was posted before February 2018.
2454:
2452:
1887:With the relevent values swapped in of course.
1832:the OR tags the calulations had NO references.
3953:Knowledge vital articles in Physical sciences
2506:
2504:
860:article provides the location in the sky. --
8:
3983:B-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
3185:Does it Meet the Criteria for a Proper Name?
2854:Is the Article Title Name best phrased as: "
2493:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
176:, which collaborates on articles related to
118:, which collaborates on articles related to
3968:B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
3692:, rather then on all of the other pages. --
2966:Astronomical Naming of "Extrasolar Planets"
3721:I have just modified one external link on
3509:I have just modified one external link on
2406:
2404:
1011:2.4 times Earth's, which corresponds to a
58:
2999:without spaces seems more appropriate. –
1372:Learn how and when to remove this message
1319:Learn how and when to remove this message
584:Article Needed for Parent Star Kepler 22b
3688:I would like if the discussion was held
3667:. I'm opening discussion as to why ...
1308:Relevant discussion may be found on the
2569:Please be skeptical about citation #7.
2417:was invoked but never defined (see the
2392:was invoked but never defined (see the
2375:
60:
19:
2486:
2381:
2379:
2243:
2072:
3988:B-Class Astronomical objects articles
3544:to let others know (documentation at
2574:
7:
3632:2003:6F:8F18:C300:288D:9EA3:B14:94AD
2962:Nomenclature of "Extrasolar Planets"
112:This article is within the scope of
3467:Article is now beyond "Start Class"
2409:
2384:
1875:Equilibrium Temperature comparisons
565:Stat Box (On the right) Has Problem
49:It is of interest to the following
1031:Earth Similarity Index (ESI) score
14:
3978:Mid-importance Astronomy articles
3725:. Please take a moment to review
3513:. Please take a moment to review
3058:on the matter that I'm aware of.
2437:"NASA, Mars: Facts & Figures"
758:confirmed by the Kepler Telescope
3948:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1335:
1282:
1081:Should be spelled "project". --
221:Anyone know how far away it is?
173:WikiProject Astronomical objects
99:
89:
62:
29:
20:
3525:Corrected formatting/usage for
148:This article has been rated as
128:Knowledge:WikiProject Astronomy
3958:B-Class level-5 vital articles
131:Template:WikiProject Astronomy
1:
3878:Apparent conflict of sources.
3640:12:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
3421:13:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
3406:07:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
3376:Artists Conception in Infobox
3234:17:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
3215:20:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
3199:19:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
3179:19:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
3164:16:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
3127:15:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
3113:02:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
3091:21:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
3076:18:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
3045:13:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
3021:13:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
3007:03:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
2990:23:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
2832:21:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
2816:20:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
2795:19:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
2773:02:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
2755:00:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
2736:00:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
2715:16:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
2689:03:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
2587:00:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
2366:22:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
2329:10:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
2307:00:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
1898:17:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
1842:00:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
1775:02:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
1414:This planet could still be a
756:It is the first planet to be
170:This article is supported by
3893:03:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
3819:00:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
3284:BJD2455256.55988 +/-0.001853
2860:" (hyphen/no-space) - Or - "
2661:17:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
2613:16:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
2558:16:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
2533:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07.011
2481:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.12.014
2343:19:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
2292:16:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
2277:12:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
2259:07:59, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
2238:
2235:
2232:
2229:
2222:
2217:
2214:
2211:
2208:
2203:
2183:
2162:
2139:
2106:
2099:
2094:
2091:
2086:
2081:
2067:
2064:
2061:
2058:
2051:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2037:
2032:
2012:
1987:
1964:
1927:
1920:
1917:
1914:
1909:
1904:
1827:14:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
1812:13:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
1794:13:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
1750:04:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
1730:09:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1436:
1430:08:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1407:08:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1392:07:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1270:23:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1245:01:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1220:06:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
1199:08:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1179:01:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1161:00:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1142:21:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1127:21:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1106:21:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1091:14:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1074:Small typo - I can't correct
1068:21:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
1046:21:13, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
1025:14:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
1002:01:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
981:21:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
965:21:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
930:02:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
912:02:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
896:02:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
870:00:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
849:23:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
835:What Constellation is It In?
830:23:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
809:15:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
787:23:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
770:22:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
751:22:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
709:06:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
694:22:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
675:00:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
661:23:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
644:21:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
626:21:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
598:19:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
579:19:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
559:19:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
544:18:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
495:09:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
452:22:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
421:13:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
399:02:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
381:22:27, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
352:20:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
332:19:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
296:19:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
268:19:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
250:19:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
231:19:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
212:23:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
3391:05:28, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
3255:05:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
2968:- AND - an earlier related
2838:Extrasolar Planet Naming: "
2742:PS: Do you mean this slide
1869:14:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
1361:the claims made and adding
730:18:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
473:14:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
367:being momentarily equal to
4009:
3973:B-Class Astronomy articles
3926:21:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
3908:06:08, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
3872:12:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
3849:09:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
3782:(last update: 5 June 2024)
3718:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3708:11:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
3683:09:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
3621:17:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
3586:(last update: 5 June 2024)
3506:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3461:15:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
3442:15:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
3050:Most comprehensive online
3028:and the exoplanet database
2980:- in any case - Enjoy! :)
2878:" (space/hyphen) - Or - "
1735:Original Research? Where?!
154:project's importance scale
3645:Incorrect Planetbox usage
3496:03:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
3481:03:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
2866:" (hyphen/space) - Or - "
169:
147:
84:
57:
3366:13:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
3344:20:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
3321:15:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
3302:14:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
3270:16:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
2872:" (space/space) - Or - "
1800:this little policy blurb
1291:This article or section
3714:External links modified
3502:External links modified
2668:Exoplanet update radius
2619:Stop The Reckless Edits
2317:Equilibrium_Temperature
1073:
902:class.(mercurywoodrose)
736:First in habitable zone
485:dense as the Earth. --
258:Yes, it's too far! ;-)
236:About 600 light-years (
3943:B-Class vital articles
2801:Confirmation process ?
1309:
884:http://kepler.nasa.gov
166:
3488:Cliffswallow-vaulting
3473:Cliffswallow-vaulting
1295:synthesis of material
165:
115:WikiProject Astronomy
36:level-5 vital article
3763:regular verification
3626:Orbit - Eccentricity
3567:regular verification
3240:Actual Transit Dates
2413:The named reference
2388:The named reference
816:Picture of the Star?
178:astronomical objects
75:Astronomical objects
3841:Martin of Sheffield
3753:After February 2018
3557:After February 2018
3536:parameter below to
3025:I'd go with SIMBAD
2956:) - ALSO SEE - the
2940:" - AS WELL AS - "
2525:2007Icar..192..404M
2473:2006Icar..182...10M
1760:"Calculation Notes"
3912:The parallax from
3807:InternetArchiveBot
3758:InternetArchiveBot
3562:InternetArchiveBot
2948:) - AS WELL AS - "
2932:) - AS WELL AS - "
2900:) - AS WELL AS - "
1346:possibly contains
1305:to the main topic.
1299:verifiably mention
1293:possibly contains
434:gets a good look.
167:
134:Astronomy articles
45:content assessment
3869:
3783:
3619:
3587:
3110:
3073:
2970:Naming Discussion
2645:
2631:comment added by
2603:comment added by
2248:
2247:
2077:
2076:
2004:−37 °C to −12 °C
1859:comment added by
1718:
1717:
1382:
1381:
1374:
1348:original research
1329:
1328:
1321:
1260:comment added by
1210:comment added by
1096:Thanks! Fixed.
955:comment added by
938:Too Big For Life?
799:comment added by
720:comment added by
463:comment added by
449:
342:comment added by
192:
191:
188:
187:
184:
183:
4000:
3870:
3861:
3837:Christmas planet
3817:
3808:
3781:
3780:
3759:
3665:User:MarioProtIV
3615:
3614:Talk to my owner
3610:
3585:
3584:
3563:
3551:
3447:The mass of the
3111:
3102:
3074:
3065:
2850:" Or Some Other?
2694:Mass and Density
2644:
2625:
2615:
2537:
2536:
2508:
2499:
2498:
2492:
2484:
2456:
2447:
2446:
2444:
2443:
2433:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2416:
2408:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2391:
2383:
2079:
1953:−83 °F to −49 °F
1951:−64 °C to −45 °C
1902:
1871:
1434:
1377:
1370:
1366:
1363:inline citations
1339:
1338:
1331:
1324:
1317:
1313:
1286:
1285:
1278:
1272:
1222:
967:
811:
732:
475:
450:
441:
354:
136:
135:
132:
129:
126:
109:
107:Astronomy portal
104:
103:
102:
93:
86:
85:
80:
77:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
4008:
4007:
4003:
4002:
4001:
3999:
3998:
3997:
3933:
3932:
3880:
3855:
3826:
3824:"Planet Manley"
3811:
3806:
3774:
3767:have permission
3757:
3731:this simple FaQ
3716:
3705:
3675:EvenGreenerFish
3661:
3657:
3647:
3628:
3618:
3613:
3578:
3571:have permission
3561:
3545:
3519:this simple FaQ
3504:
3469:
3429:
3383:EvenGreenerFish
3378:
3294:EvenGreenerFish
3247:EvenGreenerFish
3242:
3187:
3096:
3059:
2852:
2808:EvenGreenerFish
2803:
2696:
2671:
2626:
2621:
2598:
2595:
2593:Front News Feed
2545:
2540:
2510:
2509:
2502:
2485:
2458:
2457:
2450:
2441:
2439:
2435:
2434:
2427:
2414:
2412:
2410:
2402:
2389:
2387:
2385:
2377:
2373:
2006:−35 °F to 10 °F
2002:236 K to 261 K
1877:
1854:
1737:
1378:
1367:
1352:
1340:
1336:
1325:
1314:
1307:
1297:which does not
1287:
1283:
1255:
1252:
1233:
1212:178.198.224.157
1205:
1171:EvenGreenerFish
1119:EvenGreenerFish
1114:
1076:
1038:EvenGreenerFish
1033:
950:
940:
880:
837:
818:
794:
738:
715:
714:Udnduenimexim
682:
610:
586:
567:
532:
458:
435:
428:radial velocity
409:
337:
219:
197:
133:
130:
127:
124:
123:
105:
100:
98:
78:
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
4006:
4004:
3996:
3995:
3990:
3985:
3980:
3975:
3970:
3965:
3960:
3955:
3950:
3945:
3935:
3934:
3931:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3879:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3825:
3822:
3801:
3800:
3793:
3746:
3745:
3737:Added archive
3715:
3712:
3711:
3710:
3701:
3655:
3651:
3646:
3643:
3627:
3624:
3611:
3605:
3604:
3597:
3530:
3529:
3503:
3500:
3499:
3498:
3468:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3428:
3425:
3424:
3423:
3408:
3398:107.203.16.194
3377:
3374:
3373:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3369:
3368:
3358:Roentgenium111
3349:
3348:
3347:
3346:
3336:Roentgenium111
3326:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3313:Roentgenium111
3305:
3304:
3289:
3288:
3285:
3282:
3278:
3277:
3273:
3272:
3262:Roentgenium111
3241:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3226:72.196.104.217
3222:
3218:
3217:
3207:Roentgenium111
3186:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3129:
3001:Phoenix B 1of3
2976:) - AND - the
2851:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2802:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2787:Roentgenium111
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2758:
2757:
2747:Roentgenium111
2739:
2738:
2728:Roentgenium111
2723:
2722:
2695:
2692:
2670:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2620:
2617:
2594:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2579:Roentgenium111
2544:
2541:
2539:
2538:
2519:(2): 404–416.
2500:
2448:
2425:
2400:
2374:
2372:
2369:
2356:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2335:Roentgenium111
2310:
2309:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2240:
2237:
2234:
2231:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2219:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2207:
2205:
2201:
2200:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2189:
2187:
2185:
2181:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2171:
2168:
2166:
2164:
2160:
2159:
2157:
2155:
2153:
2151:
2149:
2146:
2141:
2137:
2136:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2124:
2122:
2119:
2117:
2115:
2112:
2110:
2108:
2104:
2103:
2098:
2093:
2090:
2085:
2083:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2066:
2063:
2060:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2045:
2042:
2039:
2036:
2034:
2030:
2029:
2027:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2018:
2016:
2014:
2010:
2009:
2007:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1982:
1980:
1978:
1976:
1974:
1971:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1959:
1957:
1954:
1952:
1950:
1949:209 K to 228 K
1947:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1908:
1906:
1888:
1886:
1884:
1876:
1873:
1861:205.222.248.61
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1736:
1733:
1716:
1715:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1703:
1700:
1697:
1694:
1692:
1689:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1675:
1673:
1671:
1669:
1667:
1665:
1663:
1661:
1659:
1657:
1655:
1652:
1651:
1648:
1645:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1610:
1607:
1604:
1601:
1598:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1579:Semi-Maj. Axis
1577:
1574:
1573:
1570:
1567:
1564:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1536:
1535:
1533:
1531:
1529:
1527:
1525:
1523:
1521:
1519:
1517:
1515:
1513:
1510:
1509:
1506:
1503:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1470:
1468:
1466:
1464:
1462:
1460:
1455:
1453:
1448:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1380:
1379:
1343:
1341:
1334:
1327:
1326:
1290:
1288:
1281:
1251:
1248:
1237:64.134.236.146
1232:
1231:Lets Go There!
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1181:
1153:64.134.236.146
1150:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1060:Roentgenium111
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1017:Roentgenium111
994:64.134.236.146
984:
983:
939:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
915:
914:
879:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
841:64.134.124.157
836:
833:
822:64.134.124.157
817:
814:
813:
812:
801:115.87.233.211
790:
789:
779:64.134.124.157
773:
772:
743:178.190.34.207
737:
734:
712:
711:
701:69.108.160.153
681:
678:
667:64.134.124.157
653:64.134.124.157
649:
648:
647:
646:
629:
628:
609:
606:
605:
604:
590:205.169.70.175
585:
582:
571:205.169.70.175
566:
563:
562:
561:
551:205.169.70.175
531:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
518:
517:
516:
515:
508:
507:
506:
505:
498:
497:
465:205.222.248.61
455:
454:
426:This requires
408:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
384:
383:
324:205.169.70.175
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
273:
272:
271:
270:
260:205.169.70.175
253:
252:
218:
215:
196:
193:
190:
189:
186:
185:
182:
181:
168:
158:
157:
150:Mid-importance
146:
140:
139:
137:
111:
110:
94:
82:
81:
79:Mid‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4005:
3994:
3991:
3989:
3986:
3984:
3981:
3979:
3976:
3974:
3971:
3969:
3966:
3964:
3961:
3959:
3956:
3954:
3951:
3949:
3946:
3944:
3941:
3940:
3938:
3927:
3923:
3919:
3915:
3911:
3910:
3909:
3905:
3901:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3890:
3886:
3885:103.251.15.64
3877:
3873:
3868:
3864:
3859:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3846:
3842:
3838:
3834:
3833:Planet manley
3830:
3829:Planet Manley
3823:
3821:
3820:
3815:
3810:
3809:
3798:
3794:
3791:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3778:
3772:
3768:
3764:
3760:
3754:
3749:
3744:
3740:
3736:
3735:
3734:
3732:
3728:
3724:
3719:
3713:
3709:
3704:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3691:
3687:
3686:
3685:
3684:
3680:
3676:
3671:
3668:
3666:
3658:
3650:
3644:
3642:
3641:
3637:
3633:
3625:
3623:
3622:
3616:
3609:
3602:
3598:
3595:
3591:
3590:
3589:
3582:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3558:
3553:
3549:
3543:
3539:
3535:
3528:
3524:
3523:
3522:
3520:
3516:
3512:
3507:
3501:
3497:
3493:
3489:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3478:
3474:
3466:
3462:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3443:
3439:
3435:
3434:68.190.33.136
3426:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3409:
3407:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3375:
3367:
3363:
3359:
3355:
3354:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3350:
3345:
3341:
3337:
3333:
3330:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3322:
3318:
3314:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3306:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3290:
3286:
3283:
3280:
3279:
3275:
3274:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3220:
3219:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3191:64.134.29.243
3184:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3171:64.134.29.243
3168:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3161:
3160:
3155:
3151:
3150:leaving it be
3147:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3109:
3105:
3100:
3094:
3093:
3092:
3088:
3084:
3079:
3078:
3077:
3072:
3068:
3063:
3057:
3053:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3027:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3009:
3008:
3005:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2935:
2931:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2882:
2877:
2876:
2871:
2870:
2865:
2864:
2859:
2858:
2849:
2848:
2843:
2842:
2837:
2833:
2829:
2825:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2779:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2741:
2740:
2737:
2733:
2729:
2725:
2724:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2702:
2699:
2693:
2691:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2681:Matthurricane
2677:
2676:
2669:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2657:
2652:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2630:
2618:
2616:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2573:See my reply
2572:
2571:
2570:
2567:
2563:
2560:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2542:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2507:
2505:
2501:
2496:
2490:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2455:
2453:
2449:
2438:
2432:
2430:
2426:
2420:
2407:
2405:
2401:
2395:
2382:
2380:
2376:
2370:
2368:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2270:
2269:86.184.160.59
2266:
2261:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2242:
2227:
2221:
2202:
2194:
2192:
2190:
2188:
2182:
2179:
2176:
2169:
2167:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2154:
2147:
2144:
2138:
2130:
2127:
2120:
2113:
2105:
2102:
2097:
2089:
2080:
2071:
2056:
2050:
2031:
2023:
2021:
2019:
2017:
2011:
2008:
2001:
1994:
1992:
1986:
1983:
1981:
1979:
1972:
1969:
1963:
1955:
1948:
1941:
1934:
1926:
1923:
1918:Gliese 581 g
1912:
1903:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1882:
1874:
1872:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1782:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1765:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1742:129.82.55.209
1734:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1698:
1695:
1693:
1690:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1672:
1670:
1668:
1666:
1664:
1662:
1660:
1658:
1656:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1646:
1643:
1640:
1637:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1618:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1578:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1568:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1530:
1528:
1526:
1524:
1522:
1520:
1518:
1516:
1514:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1480:
1478:Eccentricity:
1477:
1475:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1467:
1465:
1463:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1376:
1373:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1350:
1349:
1344:This article
1342:
1333:
1332:
1323:
1320:
1311:
1306:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1289:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1249:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1230:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1147:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1079:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:According to
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
982:
978:
974:
970:
969:
968:
966:
962:
958:
954:
947:
943:
937:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:
917:
916:
913:
909:
905:
900:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
885:
877:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
834:
832:
831:
827:
823:
815:
810:
806:
802:
798:
792:
791:
788:
784:
780:
775:
774:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
754:
753:
752:
748:
744:
735:
733:
731:
727:
723:
719:
710:
706:
702:
698:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
679:
677:
676:
672:
668:
663:
662:
658:
654:
645:
641:
637:
633:
632:
631:
630:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
613:
608:Bogus sources
607:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
583:
581:
580:
576:
572:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
529:
522:
521:
520:
519:
512:
511:
510:
509:
502:
501:
500:
499:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
481:
480:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
453:
448:
444:
439:
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
406:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
356:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
334:
333:
329:
325:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
297:
293:
289:
284:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
228:
224:
216:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
195:SETI Research
194:
179:
175:
174:
164:
160:
159:
155:
151:
145:
142:
141:
138:
122:on Knowledge.
121:
117:
116:
108:
97:
95:
92:
88:
87:
83:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
3918:SevenSpheres
3881:
3827:
3805:
3802:
3777:source check
3756:
3750:
3747:
3720:
3717:
3694:
3693:
3672:
3669:
3662:
3654:
3648:
3629:
3606:
3581:source check
3560:
3554:
3541:
3537:
3533:
3531:
3508:
3505:
3470:
3448:
3430:
3427:Mass Section
3379:
3243:
3188:
3158:
3143:
3037:Sailsbystars
2997:"Kepler-22b"
2996:
2938:Gliese 581 g
2934:Gliese 581 d
2880:
2879:
2874:
2873:
2868:
2867:
2862:
2861:
2856:
2855:
2853:
2846:
2845:
2840:
2839:
2824:Sailsbystars
2804:
2703:
2700:
2697:
2678:
2672:
2667:
2655:
2627:— Preceding
2622:
2605:82.42.184.75
2599:— Preceding
2596:
2568:
2564:
2561:
2546:
2516:
2512:
2489:cite journal
2467:(1): 10–22.
2464:
2460:
2440:. Retrieved
2411:Cite error:
2386:Cite error:
2351:
2280:
2262:
2249:
2109:equilibrium
2084:comparisons
1930:equilibrium
1907:comparisons
1881:Gliese 581 g
1878:
1855:— Preceding
1852:
1804:Sailsbystars
1763:
1738:
1719:
1587:
1457:
1450:
1415:
1413:
1368:
1345:
1315:
1292:
1256:— Preceding
1253:
1234:
1206:— Preceding
1184:
1151:
1134:Sailsbystars
1115:
1098:Sailsbystars
1080:
1077:
1034:
1012:
1008:
992:
988:
985:
973:Sailsbystars
957:96.251.20.61
951:— Preceding
948:
944:
941:
904:75.61.141.86
881:
862:98.28.22.128
838:
819:
795:— Preceding
757:
739:
722:69.21.173.46
716:— Preceding
713:
683:
664:
650:
611:
587:
568:
536:Ottawakismet
533:
478:
477:
459:— Preceding
456:
410:
391:75.61.141.86
344:83.11.87.161
338:— Preceding
335:
321:
282:
220:
198:
171:
149:
113:
51:WikiProjects
34:
3900:Lilsharkman
3696:MarioProtIV
3548:Sourcecheck
3449:parent star
3152:. Regards,
2972:(thanks to
2942:Kepler 22-b
2926:Kepler-10 b
2918:Kepler-22 b
2910:Kepler-22 b
2906:UPR Arecibo
2902:Kepler-22 b
2875:Kepler 22-b
2869:Kepler 22 b
2863:Kepler-22 b
2847:Kepler-22 b
2765:Martin Cash
2707:Martin Cash
2358:24.79.38.15
2299:24.79.40.48
2251:24.79.40.48
2226:Bond Albedo
2111:temperature
2082:Temperature
2055:Bond Albedo
1932:temperature
1905:Temperature
1890:24.79.40.48
1834:24.79.40.48
1767:24.79.40.48
1722:24.79.40.48
1622:Irradiance:
1582:Irradiance:
1544:Irradiance:
1422:24.79.40.48
1399:24.79.40.48
1384:24.79.40.48
1262:24.19.55.58
1191:24.79.40.48
680:Redirecting
373:Zero Thrust
288:Zero Thrust
3937:Categories
3814:Report bug
3723:Kepler-22b
3511:Kepler-22b
3453:ChiZeroOne
3413:ChiZeroOne
2995:I believe
2950:Kepler 22b
2894:Kepler-22b
2890:Kepler-16b
2886:Kepler-10b
2881:Kepler 22b
2857:Kepler-22b
2841:Kepler-22b
2783:Kepler-11f
2550:MathewDill
2442:2010-01-28
2371:References
2284:MathewDill
2186:GHG effect
2165:GHG effect
2096:Kepler 22b
2065:0.5 to 0.3
2015:GHG effect
1990:GHG effect
1541:Perihelion
1490:0.01671123
1485:0.01671123
1458:Kepler 22b
1355:improve it
1112:Atmosphere
762:Samcashion
686:Samcashion
242:Samcashion
3797:this tool
3790:this tool
3601:this tool
3594:this tool
3056:statement
3052:databases
2960:- AND -
2419:help page
2394:help page
2321:Q Science
2163:+ Earth's
2135:−88.6 °F
1988:+ Earth's
1960:−88.6 °F
1359:verifying
1310:talk page
1053:this site
858:Kepler-22
618:Hibernian
413:198.2.4.2
407:Mass/size
360:"signing"
223:198.2.4.2
125:Astronomy
120:Astronomy
70:Astronomy
39:is rated
3914:Gaia DR3
3803:Cheers.—
3703:contribs
3607:Cheers.—
2982:Drbogdan
2964:- AND -
2721:article.
2641:contribs
2629:unsigned
2601:unsigned
2548:suggest?
2415:Stephens
2204:Tidally
2140:+ Venus'
2044:Probably
2033:Tidally
1965:+ Venus'
1857:unsigned
1819:Sangrolu
1786:Sangrolu
1714:169.78%
1683:Variance
1619:Aphelion
1612:117.16%
1572:239.11%
1443:Planets:
1417:hellhole
1258:unsigned
1208:unsigned
1186:hellhole
953:unsigned
922:Hatteras
888:Hatteras
797:unsigned
718:unsigned
636:GwydionM
461:unsigned
340:unsigned
217:Distance
3858:Aldaron
3727:my edit
3617::Online
3534:checked
3515:my edit
3119:Hekerui
3099:Aldaron
3083:Hekerui
3062:Aldaron
3033:WP:AINT
3013:Hekerui
2974:Aldaron
2952:" (per
2944:" (per
2936:" and "
2928:" (per
2924:) and "
2920:" (per
2916:) and "
2912:" (per
2908:) and "
2904:" (per
2896:" (per
2892:" and "
2888:" and "
2543:Gravity
2521:Bibcode
2469:Bibcode
2244:Refs.
2223:Global
2199:−81 °F
2184:+ Mars'
2131:206 K
2125:−0.4 °F
2073:Refs.
2052:Global
2028:−81 °F
2013:+ Mars'
1956:206 K
1946:−0.4 °F
1711:101.70%
1686:Ranges:
1650:69.33%
1641:106.27%
1638:110.44%
1635:112.61%
1632:113.34%
1609:117.16%
1606:117.16%
1603:117.16%
1600:117.16%
1597:117.16%
1594:117.16%
1588:100.00%
1569:183.06%
1566:144.64%
1563:129.82%
1560:124.52%
1557:121.99%
1554:121.18%
1549:103.43%
1353:Please
878:Sources
487:Ligneus
438:Aldaron
152:on the
41:B-class
3542:failed
3004:(talk)
2946:Sci Am
2898:SIMBAD
2844:" Or "
2633:KirtZJ
2513:Icarus
2461:Icarus
2236:♦ ?? ♦
2215:♦ ?? ♦
2209:Almost
2206:locked
2197:−63 °C
2195:210 K
2177:♦ ?? ♦
2170:288 K
2152:867 °F
2150:464 °C
2148:737 K
2145:effect
2133:−67 °C
2128:-11 °C
2123:−18 °C
2121:255 K
2116:34 °C
2114:307 K
2107:Global
2092:Earth
2038:Almost
2035:locked
2026:−63 °C
2024:210 K
1995:288 K
1977:867 °F
1975:464 °C
1973:737 K
1970:effect
1958:−67 °C
1944:−18 °C
1942:255 K
1937:34 °C
1935:307 K
1928:Global
1915:Earth
1764:Thanks
1708:47.82%
1705:23.55%
1702:14.08%
1647:81.36%
1644:96.83%
1627:96.74%
1303:relate
1250:Calc 1
1083:nexxai
1013:volume
1009:radius
549:Done.
365:thrust
204:Wer900
47:scale.
3334:...--
2575:below
2265:Earth
2239:0.25
2174:59 °F
2172:15 °C
2118:93 °F
2088:Venus
2068:0.25
1999:59 °F
1997:15 °C
1939:93 °F
1911:Venus
1699:9.38%
1696:7.84%
1691:6.69%
1451:Earth
530:Links
28:This
3922:talk
3904:talk
3889:talk
3845:talk
3835:and
3690:here
3679:talk
3636:talk
3538:true
3492:talk
3477:talk
3457:talk
3438:talk
3417:talk
3402:talk
3387:talk
3362:talk
3340:talk
3317:talk
3298:talk
3266:talk
3251:talk
3230:talk
3211:talk
3195:talk
3175:talk
3159:talk
3123:talk
3087:talk
3041:talk
3017:talk
2986:talk
2930:NASA
2828:talk
2812:talk
2791:talk
2769:talk
2751:talk
2732:talk
2711:talk
2685:talk
2656:talk
2637:talk
2609:talk
2583:talk
2554:talk
2495:link
2390:Vogt
2362:talk
2339:talk
2325:talk
2303:talk
2288:talk
2273:talk
2255:talk
2233:0.29
2101:Mars
2062:0.29
1922:Mars
1894:talk
1865:talk
1838:talk
1823:talk
1808:talk
1790:talk
1771:talk
1746:talk
1726:talk
1508:0.3
1499:0.05
1496:0.03
1493:0.02
1426:talk
1403:talk
1388:talk
1266:talk
1241:talk
1216:talk
1195:talk
1175:talk
1157:talk
1138:talk
1123:talk
1102:talk
1087:talk
1064:talk
1058:. --
1042:talk
1021:talk
998:talk
977:talk
961:talk
926:talk
908:talk
892:talk
886:? --
866:talk
856:The
845:talk
826:talk
805:talk
783:talk
766:talk
747:talk
726:talk
705:talk
690:talk
671:talk
657:talk
640:talk
622:talk
594:talk
575:talk
555:talk
540:talk
491:talk
469:talk
432:Keck
417:talk
395:talk
377:talk
369:zero
348:talk
328:talk
292:talk
264:talk
246:talk
227:talk
208:talk
3771:RfC
3741:to
3575:RfC
3552:).
3540:or
3154:RJH
3144:As
3035:.
2954:CAS
2922:EDE
2914:EPE
2651:RJH
2529:doi
2517:192
2477:doi
2465:182
2230:0.9
2218:No
2143:GHG
2059:0.9
2047:No
1968:GHG
1505:0.2
1502:0.1
1357:by
1301:or
144:Mid
3939::
3924:)
3906:)
3891:)
3860:•
3856:—
3847:)
3831:,
3784:.
3779:}}
3775:{{
3706:)
3700:(/
3681:)
3673:--
3638:)
3588:.
3583:}}
3579:{{
3550:}}
3546:{{
3494:)
3479:)
3459:)
3440:)
3419:)
3404:)
3389:)
3364:)
3342:)
3319:)
3300:)
3268:)
3253:)
3232:)
3224:--
3213:)
3205:--
3197:)
3177:)
3162:)
3125:)
3101:•
3097:—
3089:)
3064:•
3060:—
3043:)
3019:)
2988:)
2830:)
2814:)
2806:--
2793:)
2771:)
2753:)
2734:)
2713:)
2687:)
2679:--
2659:)
2643:)
2639:•
2611:)
2585:)
2556:)
2527:.
2515:.
2503:^
2491:}}
2487:{{
2475:.
2463:.
2451:^
2428:^
2421:).
2403:^
2396:).
2378:^
2364:)
2341:)
2327:)
2305:)
2290:)
2275:)
2257:)
2212:No
2041:No
1896:)
1883:.
1867:)
1840:)
1825:)
1810:)
1792:)
1773:)
1748:)
1728:)
1428:)
1405:)
1390:)
1268:)
1243:)
1218:)
1197:)
1177:)
1159:)
1140:)
1125:)
1104:)
1089:)
1066:)
1044:)
1036:--
1023:)
1000:)
979:)
963:)
928:)
910:)
894:)
868:)
847:)
828:)
807:)
785:)
768:)
749:)
728:)
707:)
692:)
673:)
659:)
642:)
624:)
596:)
577:)
557:)
542:)
493:)
471:)
440:•
436:—
419:)
397:)
379:)
350:)
330:)
294:)
283:so
266:)
248:)
240:)
229:)
210:)
73::
3920:(
3902:(
3887:(
3867:C
3865:/
3863:T
3843:(
3816:)
3812:(
3799:.
3792:.
3677:(
3634:(
3603:.
3596:.
3490:(
3475:(
3455:(
3436:(
3415:(
3400:(
3385:(
3360:(
3338:(
3315:(
3296:(
3264:(
3249:(
3228:(
3209:(
3193:(
3173:(
3156:(
3121:(
3108:C
3106:/
3104:T
3085:(
3071:C
3069:/
3067:T
3039:(
3015:(
2984:(
2826:(
2810:(
2789:(
2767:(
2749:(
2730:(
2709:(
2683:(
2653:(
2635:(
2607:(
2581:(
2552:(
2535:.
2531::
2523::
2497:)
2483:.
2479::
2471::
2445:.
2360:(
2337:(
2323:(
2301:(
2286:(
2271:(
2253:(
1892:(
1863:(
1836:(
1821:(
1806:(
1788:(
1769:(
1744:(
1724:(
1424:(
1401:(
1386:(
1375:)
1369:(
1351:.
1322:)
1316:(
1312:.
1264:(
1239:(
1214:(
1193:(
1173:(
1155:(
1136:(
1121:(
1100:(
1085:(
1062:(
1040:(
1019:(
996:(
975:(
959:(
924:(
906:(
890:(
864:(
843:(
824:(
803:(
781:(
764:(
745:(
724:(
703:(
688:(
669:(
655:(
638:(
620:(
592:(
573:(
553:(
538:(
489:(
467:(
447:C
445:/
443:T
415:(
393:(
375:(
346:(
326:(
290:(
262:(
244:(
225:(
206:(
180:.
156:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.