Knowledge

Talk:Cé (Pictish territory)

Source 📝

669:– The name of the territory is usually spelt with the diacritic in scholarly literature (eg Fraser, James E. (2009). From Caledonia to Pictland: Scotland to 795. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-1231-4). The one recent work that didn't spell it this way was criticised for this in a scholarly review (Kilpatrick, Kelly, "Review - Gordon Noble and Nicholas Evans, The King in the North: The Pictish Realms of Fortriu and Ce." Northern Scotland; Nov 2020, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p209-211). Additionally, while it is perfectly possible that Cé was a kingdom, there is no evidence that it was, so using "Kingdom of" to disambiguate is misleading. The existing page at "Cé" is a redirect for the Gaelic name of a lough in Ireland whose page is at its unambiguous name in the English language. The need for this redirect could be dealt with effectively with a hatnote. 470: 449: 573: 832:“Nothing is known of the political status or structure of Cé and there is no evidence that it had its own kings.” is a peculiar statement, contradicting evidence already presented above. Eg “ Cé was the first and eponymous king, and his reign lasted fifteen years.:81 Some sources dispute this, giving him a reign of eleven, twelve or twenty years.” says there are sources, and that it’s own kings were the singular Cé (a person). 381: 360: 324: 272: 230: 286: 261: 32: 854:
Yes that section is treating an origin myth as if it is history - definitely a problem and needs to change. No historian would suggest that Cruithne actually existed, let alone that he had seven children who became kings of a territory each - it's pure story. The only Pictish territories that have
1000:
Strongly agree with that - the status of Pictland as an entity is pretty ambiguous. Treating it as a "country" in anything like the modern sense would be an anachronism. Pictish territory is fine. Do I need to relist the proposal or is this OK as a consensus (assuming nobody else objects)?
777:
Not sure I understand the basis of opposition here? Is there evidence in the annals of Loch Cé that Cé was a kingdom? If so this should definitely be added to the article. Without evidence that Cé was a kingdom though, disambiguating it with "Kingdom of.." seems actively incorrect.
192: 431: 297:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 186: 723:
in Irish or Lough Key in English, so a hatnote would seem ample. It also wouldn't add any more clicks for users looking for the Lough. There's also a disambiguation page at
1065: 421: 1050: 83: 1060: 641: 515: 509: 42: 397: 298: 293: 266: 118: 503: 388: 365: 1075: 551: 541: 124: 622:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1080: 207: 1070: 174: 1055: 1045: 591: 499: 342: 138: 69: 867:, which while possibly a bit cumbersome but is at least not actively wrong. In the absence of non-Pictish territories called 143: 59: 168: 1032:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
113: 241: 495: 482: 454: 164: 104: 975: 940: 934: 864: 826: 634: 613: 579: 476: 214: 63: 38: 271: 764: 469: 448: 148: 229: 623: 247: 180: 1006: 966: 900: 783: 736: 674: 336: 944: 872: 31: 991: 952: 837: 816: 804: 753: 697: 626:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
200: 94: 396:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
760: 109: 892: 393: 90: 650: 1002: 962: 896: 779: 732: 670: 332: 1010: 995: 970: 956: 947:. "Pictish" ties it to a place, but much more importantly ties to a historical period. 904: 841: 820: 787: 768: 740: 702: 678: 654: 987: 948: 833: 812: 693: 491: 1039: 808: 660: 494:. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the 380: 359: 929:
to be a good title to stand out of context, as all titles must do. I suggest that
498:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the 17: 646: 757: 323: 884: 983: 979: 727:
that includes all the many subtle variations on the "ce" combination (eg
486:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of the ancient 856: 860: 285: 260: 811:, but for distant and scant history cases, “kingdom” covers this. — 930: 926: 918: 910: 888: 876: 728: 587: 487: 875:
be a bit simpler? The logic of SMALLDETAIL seems to suggest that
807:, more correct and naturally disambiguated. It may have been a 567: 223: 54: 26: 322: 978:. I think we are forced to use “Pictish territory” because 922: 914: 880: 800: 724: 331:
This article was accepted on 29 December 2012 by reviewer
665: 583: 578:
On 25 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be
199: 392:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 803:. A diacritic is too small a SMALLDETAIL. Support 72:for general discussion of the article's subject. 711:I'm not sure a disambiguation page is needed - 731:) that would seem the sensible home for this. 863:. That said I can't see a major problem with 213: 8: 986:, the single word term, is not really used. 909:I disagree that SMALLDETAIL must mean that 307:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation 612:The following is a closed discussion of a 443: 354: 310:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 291:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 255: 227: 1066:Low-importance Medieval Scotland articles 691:between the Irish lough and the Kingdom? 1051:AfC submissions by date/29 December 2012 445: 406:Knowledge:WikiProject Medieval Scotland 356: 257: 409:Template:WikiProject Medieval Scotland 1061:Stub-Class Medieval Scotland articles 7: 883:, which should include an entry for 631:The result of the move request was: 386:This article is within the scope of 825:If there is no evidence of a king, 246:It is of interest to the following 62:for discussing improvements to the 41:on 22 November 2015. The result of 799:. The proposed is ambiguous with 25: 294:WikiProject Articles for creation 1028:The discussion above is closed. 855:historically attested kings are 571: 468: 447: 379: 358: 284: 270: 259: 228: 84:Click here to start a new topic. 30: 943:is much more recognisable than 689:make "Cé" a disambiguation page 546:This article has been rated as 426:This article has been rated as 37:This article was nominated for 642:closed by non-admin page mover 1: 1076:Low-importance Celts articles 961:Ok let's do that Thank you! 719:in any language, it's called 400:and see a list of open tasks. 389:WikiProject Medieval Scotland 81:Put new text under old text. 933:is fine to be a redirect to 913:should become a redirect to 879:should become a redirect to 605:Requested move 25 June 2021 526:Knowledge:WikiProject Celts 89:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1097: 1081:WikiProject Celts articles 552:project's importance scale 529:Template:WikiProject Celts 412:Medieval Scotland articles 1071:Stub-Class Celts articles 788:10:21, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 769:08:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 741:22:28, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 703:17:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC) 679:09:13, 25 June 2021 (UTC) 655:17:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC) 545: 463: 425: 374: 330: 279: 254: 119:Be welcoming to newcomers 1056:Accepted AfC submissions 1030:Please do not modify it. 1011:07:24, 7 July 2021 (UTC) 996:12:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 971:23:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 957:01:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 905:14:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 891:should probably move to 842:08:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 821:08:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 619:Please do not modify it. 1046:Stub-Class AfC articles 480:is within the scope of 976:Cé (Pictish territory) 941:Cé (Pictish territory) 935:Cé (Pictish territory) 865:Cé (Pictish territory) 827:Cé (Pictish territory) 715:isn't actually called 635:Cé (Pictish territory) 477:Cé (Pictish territory) 327: 236:This article is rated 114:avoid personal attacks 64:Cé (Pictish territory) 326: 304:Articles for creation 301:for more information. 267:Articles for creation 139:Neutral point of view 144:No original research 490:and the modern day 921:is too similar to 328: 242:content assessment 125:dispute resolution 86: 18:Talk:Kingdom of Ce 701: 645: 602: 601: 566: 565: 562: 561: 558: 557: 483:WikiProject Celts 442: 441: 438: 437: 403:Medieval Scotland 394:Medieval Scotland 366:Medieval Scotland 353: 352: 349: 348: 222: 221: 105:Assume good faith 82: 53: 52: 16:(Redirected from 1088: 692: 668: 639: 621: 590:. The result of 575: 574: 568: 534: 533: 530: 527: 524: 472: 465: 464: 459: 451: 444: 432:importance scale 414: 413: 410: 407: 404: 383: 376: 375: 370: 362: 355: 315: 314: 311: 308: 305: 288: 281: 280: 275: 274: 273: 263: 256: 239: 233: 232: 224: 218: 217: 203: 134:Article policies 55: 34: 27: 21: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 756:, cf Annals of 694:Paintspot Infez 664: 617: 607: 572: 531: 528: 525: 522: 521: 457: 411: 408: 405: 402: 401: 368: 312: 309: 306: 303: 302: 269: 240:on Knowledge's 237: 160: 155: 154: 153: 130: 100: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1094: 1092: 1084: 1083: 1078: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1058: 1053: 1048: 1038: 1037: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 945:Cé (territory) 938: 873:Cé (territory) 847: 846: 845: 844: 830: 793: 792: 791: 790: 772: 771: 746: 745: 744: 743: 706: 705: 658: 629: 628: 614:requested move 608: 606: 603: 600: 599: 592:the discussion 576: 564: 563: 560: 559: 556: 555: 548:Low-importance 544: 538: 537: 535: 532:Celts articles 492:Celtic nations 473: 461: 460: 458:Low‑importance 452: 440: 439: 436: 435: 428:Low-importance 424: 418: 417: 415: 398:the discussion 384: 372: 371: 369:Low‑importance 363: 351: 350: 347: 346: 329: 319: 318: 316: 289: 277: 276: 264: 252: 251: 245: 234: 220: 219: 157: 156: 152: 151: 146: 141: 132: 131: 129: 128: 121: 116: 107: 101: 99: 98: 87: 78: 77: 74: 73: 67: 51: 50: 43:the discussion 35: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1093: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1031: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 960: 959: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 939: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 843: 839: 835: 831: 829:is an option. 828: 824: 823: 822: 818: 814: 810: 809:petty kingdom 806: 805:Kingdom of Cé 802: 798: 795: 794: 789: 785: 781: 776: 775: 774: 773: 770: 766: 762: 761:In ictu oculi 759: 755: 754:Kingdom of Cé 751: 748: 747: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 708: 707: 704: 699: 695: 690: 686: 683: 682: 681: 680: 676: 672: 667: 662: 661:Kingdom of Ce 657: 656: 652: 648: 643: 638: 636: 627: 625: 620: 615: 610: 609: 604: 597: 593: 589: 585: 584:Kingdom of Ce 581: 577: 570: 569: 553: 549: 543: 540: 539: 536: 519: 518: 513: 512: 507: 506: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 484: 479: 478: 474: 471: 467: 466: 462: 456: 453: 450: 446: 433: 429: 423: 420: 419: 416: 399: 395: 391: 390: 385: 382: 378: 377: 373: 367: 364: 361: 357: 344: 341: 338: 334: 325: 321: 320: 317: 300: 296: 295: 290: 287: 283: 282: 278: 268: 265: 262: 258: 253: 249: 243: 235: 231: 226: 225: 216: 212: 209: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 166: 163: 162:Find sources: 159: 158: 150: 149:Verifiability 147: 145: 142: 140: 137: 136: 135: 126: 122: 120: 117: 115: 111: 108: 106: 103: 102: 96: 92: 91:Learn to edit 88: 85: 80: 79: 76: 75: 71: 65: 61: 57: 56: 48: 44: 40: 36: 33: 29: 28: 19: 1029: 868: 796: 752:but move to 749: 720: 716: 712: 688: 687:, but maybe 684: 659: 632: 630: 618: 611: 595: 547: 516: 510: 504: 496:project page 481: 475: 427: 387: 339: 313:AfC articles 299:project page 292: 248:WikiProjects 210: 204: 196: 189: 183: 177: 171: 161: 133: 58:This is the 46: 624:move review 187:free images 70:not a forum 1040:Categories 1003:JimmyGuano 963:JimmyGuano 897:JimmyGuano 893:cê (Album) 780:JimmyGuano 733:JimmyGuano 671:JimmyGuano 500:discussion 333:Alexrexpvt 238:Stub-class 988:SmokeyJoe 949:SmokeyJoe 887:too, and 885:Lough Key 834:SmokeyJoe 813:SmokeyJoe 633:moved to 502:. Please 127:if needed 110:Be polite 60:talk page 984:Pictavia 980:Pictland 343:contribs 95:get help 68:This is 66:article. 39:deletion 857:Fortriu 758:Loch Cé 721:Loch Cé 713:Loch Cé 685:Neutral 550:on the 430:on the 193:WP refs 181:scholar 871:would 861:Atholl 797:Oppose 750:Oppose 647:Vpab15 517:Assess 514:, and 511:Create 244:scale. 165:Google 596:moved 582:from 580:moved 523:Celts 488:Celts 455:Celts 208:JSTOR 169:books 123:Seek 1007:talk 992:talk 967:talk 953:talk 925:for 917:. 901:talk 859:and 838:talk 817:talk 784:talk 765:talk 737:talk 698:talk 675:talk 651:talk 594:was 505:Join 337:talk 201:FENS 175:news 112:and 47:keep 45:was 982:or 586:to 542:Low 422:Low 215:TWL 1042:: 1009:) 994:) 969:) 955:) 931:Cé 927:Cé 923:ce 919:Cé 915:CE 911:Cé 903:) 895:? 889:cê 881:CE 877:Cé 869:Cé 840:) 819:) 801:ce 786:) 767:) 739:) 729:cê 725:CE 717:Cé 677:) 666:Cé 663:→ 653:) 616:. 588:Cé 508:, 345:). 195:) 93:; 1005:( 990:( 965:( 951:( 937:. 899:( 836:( 815:( 782:( 763:( 735:( 700:) 696:( 673:( 649:( 644:) 640:( 637:. 598:. 554:. 520:. 434:. 340:· 335:( 250:: 211:· 205:· 197:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 172:· 167:( 97:. 49:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Kingdom of Ce
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
talk page
Cé (Pictish territory)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.