225:
detail for the lead), 3) somehow merge the paragraph starting "Eventually most HIV-infected individuals develop AIDS." with the mentions elsewhere about opportunistic infections, antiretrovirals, etc (I'm not as sure about how to do this one). As for the epidemiology, it does seem like a lot of numbers, but we should hit high points like the huge impact on Africa (I've trimmed a bit of the language but it could probably be shorter still).
212:
lede being a readable overview. If something needs to be sacrificed at the Good
Article altar, my suggestion is that we reduce the epidemiological information (much of paragraph 3) to about a sentence, and combine it with paragraph 4. That will get the "magic number" for GA; but it should probably only be done if someone also feels it will improve the article. -
312:. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to update the access dates for the online sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing!
284:
Good work addressing some of the issues. I will leave the article on hold for another week for the remaining issues to be addressed. The sourcing issues are the main concerns, and if sources cannot be found for the content, then it should be removed for now until a source is found later. I had forgot
152:
This article covers the topic well and has a great source of free images. Due to the length of the article, I will wait to review the prose for any other issues until the above points have been addressed. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension
211:
to be is a concise, readable overview of the article. Therefore any criticism of its length should be based on content rather than an arbitrary number. Specifically, those who assert that it is too long should state what information there is superfluous or in some way detracts from the goal of the
224:
Well, here are my two cents about what to cut (based on what seems out of place for a lead, not based on any numeric target for length): 1) sentence starting "Previous names" (none of these are in wide use today), 2) sentence starting "HIV infection leads to low levels of CD4+ T cells" (too much
129:
The "Other routes" section consists of a single sentence. Either expand on the information or merge the subsection into another one. There are also other single sentences throughout the article. They should be expanded on or be incorporated into another
93:
157:. I'll contact all of the main contributors and related WikiProjects so the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing!
100:. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a GA. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that needs to be addressed.
308:
Good work addressing the sourcing issues. I went through and made some cleanup edits, please review them. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a
239:
I certainly agree on the previous names; not needed in intro. I will do that and attempt to squish into the arbitrary "4" paragraphs; feel free to revert, undo, or re-edit. -
119:
There's some errors with the spacing of the inline citations (such as ". " or ".."). Try and fix all occurrences. I'll fix any you miss when I copyedit the article.
285:
to watchlist this review page, so if you have any additional comments/questions, I'll try and reply quicker this time. --Happy editing!
89:
321:
294:
166:
153:
is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which can then later be renominated at
254:
numbers of deaths could be removed from the intro; we can content ourselves with history rather than prognostication. -
66:
140:
62:
207:
to be reduced to four paragraphs: four paragraphs is suggested as a guideline, with exceptions. What the lede
47:
317:
290:
162:
39:
124:
The "Blood or blood product", "The clinical course of infection", and "AIDS" sections are unsourced.
136:
230:
313:
286:
158:
275:
194:
180:
106:
256:
241:
214:
154:
309:
226:
114:
Address all of the "citation needed" tags. Some have been there since
October 2008.
97:
271:
190:
176:
55:
17:
144:
325:
298:
279:
260:
245:
234:
218:
198:
184:
170:
32:
189:#6 dabs are fixed. Still working on dead/redirects. --
74:
43:
105:
The lead needs to be reduced to four paragraphs, see
175:#3 is done (at least, I think I caught them all). --
8:
96:to determine if the article should remain a
139:that should be fixed as well as a few
7:
24:
203:As for, #1: no, the lede doesn't
1:
250:Probably the sentence about
147:can help with fixing those.
341:
326:19:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
299:05:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
280:04:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
261:10:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
246:10:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
235:14:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
219:22:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
199:21:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
185:21:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
171:18:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
90:WikiProject Good Articles
141:dead links/redirects
84:GA Sweeps: On hold
270:#6 completed. --
332:
259:
244:
217:
145:Internet Archive
135:There are a few
79:
70:
51:
340:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
330:
329:
306:
304:GA Sweeps: Kept
255:
240:
213:
109:for guidelines.
88:As part of the
86:
60:
37:
31:
29:
27:GA Reassessment
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
338:
336:
305:
302:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
150:
149:
132:
126:
121:
116:
111:
92:, we're doing
85:
82:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
337:
328:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
303:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
282:
281:
277:
273:
262:
258:
253:
249:
248:
247:
243:
238:
237:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
210:
206:
201:
200:
196:
192:
187:
186:
182:
178:
173:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
148:
146:
142:
138:
133:
131:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
108:
103:
102:
101:
99:
95:
91:
83:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
310:Good Article
307:
283:
269:
251:
208:
204:
202:
188:
174:
151:
134:
128:
123:
118:
113:
104:
98:Good article
87:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
314:Nehrams2020
287:Nehrams2020
159:Nehrams2020
44:visual edit
130:paragraph.
252:predicted
257:Nunh-huh
242:Nunh-huh
215:Nunh-huh
18:Talk:HIV
322:contrib
295:contrib
227:Kingdon
167:contrib
107:WP:LEAD
67:history
48:history
34:Article
155:WP:GAN
143:. The
94:Sweeps
272:Scray
209:needs
191:Scray
177:Scray
76:Watch
16:<
318:talk
291:talk
276:talk
231:talk
205:need
195:talk
181:talk
163:talk
137:dabs
63:edit
40:edit
324:)
320:•
297:)
293:•
278:)
233:)
197:)
183:)
169:)
165:•
65:|
46:|
42:|
316:(
289:(
274:(
229:(
193:(
179:(
161:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.