40:?" But after reading it, the topic is presented quite well and makes sense, and sheds a lot of light on the pop singer's health and appearance issues. The lead section summarizes the article very well also. It is well-cited, though perhaps a little too dependent on the Taraborrelli text -- could be an issue for the folks at
77:
Thanks for that, agree there is a slight over usage of
Taraborrelli, but as his book is the most respected on the subject (Mr. Jackson) it only seems like a logical choice to use it. As for FA, I don't think I could stomach it, getting
31:
Article is very well-written, though I did make a few minor copy-editting changes and fixed an issue with the reference citations. I have to admit, I kind of laughed at the topic when I first saw it at
44:, but I think with the other references cited, it's good for GA. As far as the completeness criterion, I think it covers all of the major aspects of his conditions.
17:
94:
71:
67:
37:
92:
63:
55:, with some help by others here and there. Nice work! The images are all tagged appropriately.
79:
59:
48:
83:
52:
41:
33:
51:or stability. Most of the edits were done by
18:Talk:Health and appearance of Michael Jackson
8:
7:
36:, thinking, "WTF? How did this pass
24:
82:to FA nearly killed me. :-) —
1:
47:I don't see any issues with
95:16:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
72:16:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
58:So this article passes the
111:
60:Good article criteria
62:and will be listed.
102:
90:
110:
109:
105:
104:
103:
101:
100:
99:
84:
80:Michael Jackson
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
108:
106:
98:
97:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
107:
96:
93:
91:
89:
88:
81:
76:
75:
74:
73:
69:
65:
61:
56:
54:
50:
45:
43:
39:
38:WP:NOTABILITY
35:
26:
19:
86:
85:
57:
46:
30:
27:GA Review
64:Dr. Cash
53:Realist2
87:Realist
49:WP:NPOV
42:WP:FAC
34:WP:GAN
16:<
68:talk
70:)
66:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.