21:
439:
418:
58:
201:
449:
346:
253:
325:
232:
779:
I was looking into whether this article should be delisted or not. I asked at the
Teahouse and the editor that responded didn't seem to think my rationale was necessarily bad, but I've recently had AfDs that went poorly so I figured I would drop my rationale here on the talk page and if someone else
879:
There are actually quite a lot of sources that talk about winning the fancast award - notable authors, publishers, etc. - but the problem in regards to composing a list is that it doesn't add anything to the list to cite them; it's just "I won!" or "an author that writes for us won!", which doesn't
867:
My contention is that the "Hugo Awards", as a concept, are very notable, and winning a Hugo, regardless of category, is considered winning a major sff award. I further contend that as an extension of that, it makes sense for the categories that are long enough to support a list to be split off into
799:
even for demonstrating notability of the award itself rather than this category specifically. Google Books and Google
Scholar yield even fewer results with nothing that contains in-depth or significant coverage of this specific award category. I don’t see how this specific category of the award is
787:, featured lists should “cover a topic that lends itself to list format and ... meet the requirements for all Knowledge content.” Most of the sources currently being cited are not reliable and independent secondary sources. Some of them don’t even mention the words “fancast” or “podcast” such as
833:
but I think the example maps on pretty well and I'm trying to explain where I'm coming from here rather than persuade anyone of my above rationale. I'm wondering if I'm missing some really obvious policy or guideline and wanted some input. Don't ping me though if you're just here to yell at me.
859:
Yes, in ~2010 I got all of the extant Hugo categories to FL. Since then, since they've added a few new categories in the past decade, I've gotten
Graphic Story promoted (2011), Fancast promoted (2015), and plan on getting Best Series to FL after the awards this year as it will have gotten long
915:
thank you for the prompt and thorough response. I didn't even realise you were still active on
Knowledge. I was expecting a much more abrasive answer and appreciate the tone you used. As I said above I'm not going to pursue the delisting, but hearing your rationale is much appreciated.
883:
I see where you're coming from with the iHeartRadio awards lists, but I think there's a big difference between trying to make lists for individual award ceremonies for a 7-year old awards show and having lists for the entire categories of a 68-year old "premier award in science
825:. The article was promoted to a featured list in 2015, but there doesn’t appear to be any discussion about the article’s notability during the nomination. I think the article should either be merged with the award or deleted, but delisting would likely be the first step.
887:
All that said, anyone can start an FLRC if they want! The process exists for a reason, and it will get a wider audience than this talk page. This is the first complaint of its nature in 11 years and 17 lists, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you're wrong.
821:(it appears the same editor got at least 15 award categories promoted to featured sometime around 2010), but claiming that this article should not be deleted or not be delisted because similar articles exist would likely be considered an example of
875:
Merging this or any of the sublists into Hugo Award would create major undue weight to that article, as you'd have the article spend most of it's length talking about the awards in general and then suddenly spend a lot of time on a specific award
171:
35:
828:
I previously tried creating articles for the separate years of the iHeartRadio awards and in the end none of mine got published and others got deleted, which I understand this rationale would be considered
955:
945:
400:
137:
118:
152:
880:
translate to useful information to the reader. Generally, sources that have longer, more relevant things to say talk about the Hugo awards as a group, not specific subcategories.
950:
1000:
505:
495:
872:
article. Most of these 17 lists are quite long, simply due to being around for decades; this one is one of the shorter lists as it's one of the shorter categories.
721:
717:
703:
611:
607:
593:
1005:
970:
307:
297:
995:
940:
471:
975:
985:
390:
965:
960:
462:
423:
273:
68:
860:
enough. There is one list per category, with the exception of the small one-off or short-lived categories, which are collected together in
791:
article, which is about a book not a podcast. The only result on Google News for “Hugo Award for Best
Fancast” is this trivial mention by
980:
699:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
589:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
366:
260:
237:
808:
that notability. The subject of the article is very specific and I don’t think it’s appropriate to have a stand alone list per
818:
573:
764:
654:
353:
330:
212:
689:
814:
812:. I also noticed while assessing the article that there are quite a few other “Hugo Award for Best <media type: -->
673:
531:
40:
788:
454:
563:
74:
720:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
610:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
990:
861:
30:
57:
921:
839:
755:
681:
645:
539:
200:
20:
739:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
727:
629:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
617:
218:
78:
44:
680:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
538:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
553:
830:
822:
547:
795:. Searching for “Hugo Award” “Best Fancast” gets some hits on Google News, but it’s all extremely
269:
470:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
365:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
272:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
917:
851:
835:
724:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
614:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
792:
740:
630:
805:
796:
583:
82:
48:
747:
637:
895:
809:
467:
925:
901:
843:
769:
659:
574:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141006193748/http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-categories/
784:
706:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
596:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
746:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
636:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
934:
690:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100103034223/http://locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Hugo.html
438:
417:
713:
693:
603:
577:
780:
decides to pursue the delisting process they can do so. Here was my reasoning:
910:
890:
869:
801:
712:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
602:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
564:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141006193748/http://www.thehugoawards.org/about/
444:
448:
77:. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the
783:
The article appears to have significant notability issues. According to
345:
324:
265:
567:
252:
231:
554:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090414154525/http://www.worldcon.org/
548:
http://www.litro.co.uk/index.php/2010/04/20/hugo-awards-announced/
362:
358:
194:
804:
and even if the Hugo Award is notable this category does not
264:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable
584:
http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/2012-hugo-awards/
557:
684:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
542:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
677:
535:
164:
130:
111:
956:
Featured lists that have not appeared on the main page
946:
Knowledge featured topics Hugo Awards featured content
868:
their own list articles, and not jammed into the main
466:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
357:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
716:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
606:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
702:This message was posted before February 2018.
592:This message was posted before February 2018.
694:http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Hugo.html
578:http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-categories/
8:
672:I have just modified one external link on
412:
319:
226:
90:
15:
530:I have just modified 5 external links on
951:High-importance Featured topics articles
1001:Low-importance science fiction articles
414:
321:
228:
480:Knowledge:WikiProject Science Fiction
198:
7:
1006:WikiProject Science Fiction articles
483:Template:WikiProject Science Fiction
460:This article is within the scope of
351:This article is within the scope of
258:This article is within the scope of
568:http://www.thehugoawards.org/about/
217:It is of interest to the following
81:. If you can update or improve it,
47:. If you can update or improve it,
971:Top-importance podcasting articles
14:
996:FL-Class science fiction articles
941:FL-Class Featured topics articles
676:. Please take a moment to review
534:. Please take a moment to review
447:
437:
416:
344:
323:
282:Knowledge:WikiProject Podcasting
251:
230:
199:
56:
19:
976:WikiProject Podcasting articles
800:independently notable from the
582:Corrected formatting/usage for
546:Corrected formatting/usage for
500:This article has been rated as
395:This article has been rated as
302:This article has been rated as
285:Template:WikiProject Podcasting
986:Low-importance awards articles
819:Hugo Award for Best Fan Writer
1:
474:and see a list of open tasks.
369:and see a list of open tasks.
276:and see a list of open tasks.
966:FL-Class podcasting articles
961:Old requests for peer review
375:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards
815:Hugo Award for Best Fanzine
674:Hugo Award for Best Fancast
532:Hugo Award for Best Fancast
463:WikiProject Science Fiction
378:Template:WikiProject Awards
270:podcast-related information
64:Hugo Award for Best Fancast
27:Hugo Award for Best Fancast
1022:
733:(last update: 5 June 2024)
669:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
623:(last update: 5 June 2024)
527:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
506:project's importance scale
455:Speculative fiction portal
308:project's importance scale
33:, which means it has been
926:16:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
902:16:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
844:15:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
660:06:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
499:
432:
394:
339:
301:
246:
225:
181:
93:
89:
981:FL-Class awards articles
862:Discontinued Hugo Awards
770:01:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
558:http://www.worldcon.org/
486:science fiction articles
153:Featured topic candidate
665:External links modified
523:External links modified
172:Featured list candidate
261:WikiProject Podcasting
207:This article is rated
714:regular verification
604:regular verification
704:After February 2018
594:After February 2018
288:podcasting articles
79:Knowledge community
45:Knowledge community
39:as one of the best
758:InternetArchiveBot
709:InternetArchiveBot
648:InternetArchiveBot
599:InternetArchiveBot
354:WikiProject Awards
213:content assessment
94:Article milestones
734:
624:
520:
519:
516:
515:
512:
511:
411:
410:
407:
406:
318:
317:
314:
313:
193:
192:
189:
188:
1013:
914:
898:
893:
855:
768:
759:
732:
731:
710:
658:
649:
622:
621:
600:
488:
487:
484:
481:
478:
457:
452:
451:
441:
434:
433:
428:
420:
413:
401:importance scale
383:
382:
379:
376:
373:
348:
341:
340:
335:
327:
320:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
255:
248:
247:
242:
234:
227:
210:
204:
203:
195:
182:Current status:
167:
148:October 29, 2013
133:
114:
91:
60:
43:produced by the
23:
16:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1012:
1011:
1010:
991:Awards articles
931:
930:
908:
896:
891:
856:Some comments:
849:
777:
762:
757:
725:
718:have permission
708:
682:this simple FaQ
667:
652:
647:
615:
608:have permission
598:
540:this simple FaQ
525:
485:
482:
479:
477:Science Fiction
476:
475:
468:science fiction
453:
446:
426:
424:Science Fiction
381:awards articles
380:
377:
374:
371:
370:
333:
287:
284:
281:
278:
277:
240:
211:on Knowledge's
208:
165:January 3, 2015
163:
131:October 7, 2013
129:
110:
66:is part of the
12:
11:
5:
1019:
1017:
1009:
1008:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
933:
932:
929:
928:
906:
905:
904:
885:
881:
877:
873:
865:
793:Locus Magazine
776:
773:
752:
751:
744:
697:
696:
688:Added archive
666:
663:
642:
641:
634:
587:
586:
580:
572:Added archive
570:
562:Added archive
560:
552:Added archive
550:
524:
521:
518:
517:
514:
513:
510:
509:
502:Low-importance
498:
492:
491:
489:
472:the discussion
459:
458:
442:
430:
429:
427:Low‑importance
421:
409:
408:
405:
404:
397:Low-importance
393:
387:
386:
384:
367:the discussion
349:
337:
336:
334:Low‑importance
328:
316:
315:
312:
311:
304:Top-importance
300:
294:
293:
291:
274:the discussion
256:
244:
243:
241:Top‑importance
235:
223:
222:
216:
205:
191:
190:
187:
186:
179:
178:
175:
168:
160:
159:
156:
149:
145:
144:
141:
134:
126:
125:
122:
115:
107:
106:
103:
100:
96:
95:
87:
86:
75:featured topic
61:
53:
52:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1018:
1007:
1004:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
938:
936:
927:
923:
919:
918:TipsyElephant
912:
907:
903:
900:
899:
894:
886:
882:
878:
874:
871:
866:
863:
858:
857:
853:
852:TipsyElephant
848:
847:
846:
845:
841:
837:
836:TipsyElephant
832:
831:WP:OTHERSTUFF
826:
824:
823:WP:OTHERSTUFF
820:
816:
811:
807:
803:
798:
794:
790:
786:
781:
774:
772:
771:
766:
761:
760:
749:
745:
742:
738:
737:
736:
729:
723:
719:
715:
711:
705:
700:
695:
691:
687:
686:
685:
683:
679:
675:
670:
664:
662:
661:
656:
651:
650:
639:
635:
632:
628:
627:
626:
619:
613:
609:
605:
601:
595:
590:
585:
581:
579:
575:
571:
569:
565:
561:
559:
555:
551:
549:
545:
544:
543:
541:
537:
533:
528:
522:
507:
503:
497:
494:
493:
490:
473:
469:
465:
464:
456:
450:
445:
443:
440:
436:
435:
431:
425:
422:
419:
415:
402:
398:
392:
389:
388:
385:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
350:
347:
343:
342:
338:
332:
329:
326:
322:
309:
305:
299:
296:
295:
292:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
254:
250:
249:
245:
239:
236:
233:
229:
224:
220:
214:
206:
202:
197:
196:
185:
184:Featured list
180:
176:
174:
173:
169:
166:
162:
161:
157:
155:
154:
150:
147:
146:
142:
140:
139:
135:
132:
128:
127:
123:
121:
120:
116:
113:
112:June 24, 2013
109:
108:
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
70:
65:
62:
59:
55:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
31:featured list
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
889:
827:
789:The Guardian
782:
778:
756:
753:
728:source check
707:
701:
698:
671:
668:
646:
643:
618:source check
597:
591:
588:
529:
526:
501:
461:
396:
352:
303:
259:
219:WikiProjects
183:
170:
151:
136:
117:
83:please do so
67:
63:
49:please do so
34:
26:
813:” such as
138:Peer review
119:Peer review
69:Hugo Awards
935:Categories
870:Hugo Award
806:WP:INHERIT
802:Hugo Award
797:WP:ROUTINE
765:Report bug
655:Report bug
279:Podcasting
238:Podcasting
36:identified
884:fiction".
876:category.
775:Delisting
748:this tool
741:this tool
638:this tool
631:this tool
810:WP:SALAT
754:Cheers.—
644:Cheers.—
266:podcasts
209:FL-class
177:Promoted
158:Promoted
143:Reviewed
124:Reviewed
785:WP:FLCR
678:my edit
536:my edit
504:on the
399:on the
306:on the
102:Process
372:Awards
363:prizes
359:awards
331:Awards
215:scale.
105:Result
71:series
911:PresN
41:lists
29:is a
922:talk
892:Pres
840:talk
817:and
361:and
268:and
99:Date
73:, a
722:RfC
692:to
612:RfC
576:to
566:to
556:to
496:Low
391:Low
298:Top
937::
924:)
888:--
842:)
735:.
730:}}
726:{{
625:.
620:}}
616:{{
920:(
913::
909:@
897:N
864:.
854::
850:@
838:(
767:)
763:(
750:.
743:.
657:)
653:(
640:.
633:.
508:.
403:.
310:.
221::
85:.
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
