84:
53:
148:
22:
168:
70:
310:
No, I don't think that would be an improvement (it seems like testimonials, which I've not found to inspire confidence, recalling a popular program whose developers wrote their own). Focusing on finding reviews by individuals who are critical and well-known for their relevant expertise is the route
287:
With "change commentary" you refer to my comment "With thousands of installations - some of them serving several million users - I don't see how it could be less notable than its contenders
Roundcube and Squirrelmail"? So would it make sense to link to the large installations in the same way as the
217:
I don't think merging this to the main Horde framework is such a good idea. IMP has been the original software that Chuck established. It was rather successful and got installed on thousands of servers many of which still use it today. As a webmailer it really has its own profile and competes with
272:
The phpmagazine link is an example of a random comment by an anonymous person (not a good source). The techworld link has the appearance of a press release. Given the claims in change commentary, there should be better sources than these. If I'm reading a "review", I'm looking for someone who
218:
alternatives such as
Squirrelmail and Roundcube. Horde on the other hand is a web application framework and delivers a well known groupware. While both are linked they have their own characteristics that do not fit that well together on a single page.I will remove the merge suggestion.
69:
497:
256:
So I removed that note too early. I added two additional external links for now but I planned on expanding the article anyway and will request removal of the note once it has a bit more meat.
507:
292:
page does this? It would not be much of a problem and as mentioned the installations tend to be larger. But I somehow felt this is not the right way to approach this.
482:
415:
411:
397:
132:
492:
138:
477:
273:
gives the reader the impression that they've looked at something critically, not merely echoing what the vendor has to say about their product
487:
108:
344:
241:
in particular sources which are demonstrably third-party and knowledgeable about the topic area, there's not much for the reader here
393:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
512:
91:
58:
502:
157:
63:
458:
33:
367:
414:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
449:
375:
348:
297:
261:
223:
176:
21:
371:
104:
433:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
421:
383:
293:
257:
219:
39:
374:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
340:
107:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
316:
278:
246:
418:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
434:
335:
211:
441:
237:
It seems that the topic is sourced from "horde" and its developers. Without some useful
463:
400:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
352:
320:
301:
282:
265:
250:
227:
188:
180:
440:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
471:
312:
274:
242:
238:
407:
147:
83:
52:
406:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
167:
289:
100:
96:
384:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120128114924/https://codebits.eu/Ghunti
191:. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the
15:
387:
166:
146:
378:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
336:
http://lists.horde.org/archives/announce/2012/000844.html
95:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
410:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
498:Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
331:IMP version H5 (6.0.2) is out since November 2012
137:This article has not yet received a rating on the
396:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
366:I have just modified one external link on
47:
19:
508:Automatically assessed Computing articles
49:
192:
483:Unknown-importance Computing articles
7:
493:Unknown-importance software articles
89:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
233:Notability and third party sources
14:
370:. Please take a moment to review
82:
68:
51:
20:
117:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing
120:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
478:Stub-Class Computing articles
464:13:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
155:This article is supported by
111:and see a list of open tasks.
488:Stub-Class software articles
321:09:11, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
302:07:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
283:00:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
266:23:59, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
251:21:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
228:20:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
353:04:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
529:
427:(last update: 5 June 2024)
388:https://codebits.eu/Ghunti
368:Internet Messaging Program
363:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
139:project's importance scale
174:
154:
136:
77:
46:
359:External links modified
513:All Computing articles
175:This article has been
171:
151:
105:information technology
28:This article is rated
503:All Software articles
170:
150:
92:WikiProject Computing
408:regular verification
158:WikiProject Software
398:After February 2018
311:that I would take.
177:automatically rated
452:InternetArchiveBot
403:InternetArchiveBot
187:because it uses a
172:
152:
123:Computing articles
34:content assessment
428:
343:comment added by
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
183:or other tool as
520:
462:
453:
426:
425:
404:
355:
194:
125:
124:
121:
118:
115:
86:
79:
78:
73:
72:
71:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
528:
527:
523:
522:
521:
519:
518:
517:
468:
467:
456:
451:
419:
412:have permission
402:
376:this simple FaQ
361:
338:
329:
235:
215:
122:
119:
116:
113:
112:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
526:
524:
516:
515:
510:
505:
500:
495:
490:
485:
480:
470:
469:
446:
445:
438:
391:
390:
382:Added archive
360:
357:
328:
325:
324:
323:
307:
306:
305:
304:
269:
268:
234:
231:
214:
208:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
173:
163:
162:
153:
143:
142:
135:
129:
128:
126:
109:the discussion
87:
75:
74:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
525:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
475:
473:
466:
465:
460:
455:
454:
443:
439:
436:
432:
431:
430:
423:
417:
413:
409:
405:
399:
394:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
377:
373:
369:
364:
358:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
337:
332:
327:Update needed
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
308:
303:
299:
295:
294:Gunnar Wrobel
291:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
271:
270:
267:
263:
259:
258:Gunnar Wrobel
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
232:
230:
229:
225:
221:
220:Gunnar Wrobel
213:
210:Merging into
209:
190:
189:stub template
186:
182:
178:
169:
165:
164:
160:
159:
149:
145:
144:
140:
134:
131:
130:
127:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
450:
447:
422:source check
401:
395:
392:
365:
362:
345:91.38.94.154
339:— Preceding
333:
330:
236:
216:
184:
156:
90:
40:WikiProjects
472:Categories
459:Report bug
195:parameter.
185:Stub-class
30:Stub-class
442:this tool
435:this tool
290:Roundcube
114:Computing
101:computing
97:computers
59:Computing
448:Cheers.—
341:unsigned
313:TEDickey
275:TEDickey
243:TEDickey
64:Software
372:my edit
193:|auto=
103:, and
36:scale.
239:WP:RS
212:Horde
179:by a
349:talk
334:See
317:talk
298:talk
279:talk
262:talk
247:talk
224:talk
416:RfC
386:to
181:bot
133:???
474::
429:.
424:}}
420:{{
351:)
319:)
300:)
281:)
264:)
249:)
226:)
99:,
62::
461:)
457:(
444:.
437:.
347:(
315:(
296:(
277:(
260:(
245:(
222:(
161:.
141:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
