3249:.) In my experience, there is a general tendency in Indian publications to expand the geographical extent of the "Indian subcontinent," a vaguely defined 19th-century or early 20th-century term, and to prefer it to the more neutral "South Asia," which references regions of a large continent. As for "Greater India," except for specialty usage geophysics, it is now mostly an outdated term, popular once with nationalistic linguists and cultural historians of India (in the 20s and 30s). I'm surprised that all this is being discussed again. I had thought these issues had been resolved long ago. Also: Afghanistan and (especially not Burma) have never been a part of the Indian subcontinent, except perhaps in outliers (among usage)
1734:
the core countries" followed by a completely separate sentence that says something like, "Usually, _____ are excluded, although sometimes they are included, especially for geological purposes". The two things that this achieves are: (1) most people will end up with an answer that is applicable to whatever they're reading, and (2) it emphasizes the exclusion of
Afghanistan while acknowledging that there is disagreement about the 'correct' place to draw the line (e.g., depending upon whether you're talking about politics or
3575:
and you can also of course expand that section below. This version you suggest now is basically almost the same as the initial version with “rarely” , the user who agreed to this are only the ones who were also already agreeing to that version, the other users against it already had left their opinion on it in the RFC, so you can’t expect everybody to respond the same thing to a statement which they already disagreed to but with only a word changed(just an albeit before the rare)
1182:. Please note that the sentence you cherrypicked is followed by "It should establish the context in which the topic is being considered by supplying the set of circumstances or facts that surround it. If appropriate, it should give the location and time. It should also establish the boundaries of the topic; for example, the lead for the article List of environmental issues succinctly states that the list covers "harmful aspects of human activity on the biophysical environment"."
3755:
Pakistan to the west, as it falls under the "Asian" racial category whilst
Afghanistan under the "White" racial. Afghanistan is also not only considered as a Central Asian country, but also a Middle Eastern by the FBI and some institutes. Overall, its too distinct to be labelled as a part of the Indian subcontinent,it makes no sense to consider a Turkmen or Uzbek, for example, to belong to a so called Indian subcontinent and there isn't much of a case to include them in.
31:
1642:
nonsense(Kabul part of
Gandhara, seriously ?) . Especially, the part “South Asia and the Subcontinent are often interchangeable” should be clearly mentioned(even though it’s complicated with the SAARC and Afghanistan again since Afghanistan only recently joined for economic reasons but that’s why we have the term “often” or maybe we can say “sometimes”, either way it shouldn’t just say “are used interchangeably”). What do you think ?
5275:
3597:, the version before the disputes started (which means re-instating the information without the tweaks). But ofcourse there can be another RfC, or even a DRN. I would prefer to get out of this with a consensus, which neither needs to be unanimous, nor win a majority vote. Ideally an uninvolved admin can decide if there is a consensus or not, at the end of the 30 days. If needed we can resort to requesting a
1377:. However, some compromise could be reached on the second sentence, around that "often". Could add more balance with something more like: "The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "South Asia" may be used interchangeably to denote all or large parts of the region," where "large parts" is acknowledging that some people (e.g., these editors!) would disagree with some of the categorisation.
2507:
sometimes included in the Indian subcontinent as a boundary territory between
Central Asia and northwestern parts of the Indian subcontinent, the socio-religious history of Afghanistan are related to the Turkic-influenced Central Asia. The Maldives, a country consisting of a small archipelago southwest of the peninsula, is considered part of the Indian subcontinent.“
3808:
712:
5566:
I want to complain about the main map used in the
Infobox. Why use the national colour of India? The Indian subcontinent is not India! All maps in Knowledge use the dark green colour, why is this one using the national colour of India? It is an insult to the other six South Asian countries. I am very
5362:
Geographically or geologically? Geographically, they are obviously not part of the physical "subcontinent", they are undisputedly island countries instead. Geologically, you are partly right, Sri Lanka shares the same continental shelf with the Indian mainland, but
Maldives isn't, the country is made
5346:
I would have to disagree that Sri Lanka and
Maldives are technically not part of the Indian subcontinent. Geologically they are. They are located on the Indian Plate. Sri Lanka, in particular, has always been connected to India geologically. Geologically and culturally, they are very much part of
5190:
Another example is “Indian classical music”. The definition of “Indian classical music” is “music from the Indian subcontinent”, but again, this only refers to the countries of India, Pakistan and
Bangladesh, with one form of Indian classical music being “Hindustani” belonging to Pakistan, Bangladesh
3658:
In fact, consensus requires an ability to agree to others, even if they don't agree to you. And you and شاه عباس clearly lack that ability. Also understand that two editors constantly protesting is no barrier to consensus. Also it is apparent that you have only one argument – posting cites to "prove"
3574:
An RFC usually goes for at least 30 days if there isn’t a unanimously consensus, which is far from being the case here. I still stand by what I said that
Afghanistan doesn’t deserve a mention in the lead but instead should be discussed further below as it already is, which you actually also agreed to
3335:
I guess the whole problem stemmed from the decision to keep two separate articles for the same entity - South Asia and Indian subcontinent. That definitely required a defination for the subcontinent, but unfortunately highly reputed sources are not in agreement. If we go by OED alone, then this needs
2506:
Seems like a fair solution, however don’t you think this text about
Afghanistan in the geopolitical section already covers your suggestion: “Afghanistan, despite often being considered as a part of South Asia, is usually not included in the Indian subcontinent. Even when some parts of Afghanistan are
1332:
Both should probably be included. The second sentence is important because the reader should know, up front, that the terms are often used interchangeably. The first sentence (Afghanistan and Myanmar) appears to be well sourced. The purpose of the lead is to succinctly explain what a topic covers and
994:
this isn't where you provide your opinion in regards to the information presented. The purpose of this RFC (although it takes a while to discern because of the lack of clarity) is to determine whether or not this information should be included in the lead section or not. That is to say: whether it is
5854:
It's important to acknowledge that 'Indian subcontinent' is a widely recognized term with historical and geographical significance. While 'Bareazam' might be another name, 'Indian subcontinent' is the commonly accepted term in English to describe this region. Changing it would only create confusion.
3754:
for reasons stated before, the term Indian subcontinent is generally used for the area under the control of the British, which Afghanistan as a whole was certainly never a part of. This is the standard view politically speaking, for example the US census recognizes the subcontinent as beginning with
3275:
Almost every source (RS or not) that provides a list of countries that belong to the Indian subcontinent includes Sri Lanka (apart from OED), and, apart from a handful, also Maldives. Some also include Afghanistan and Myanmar (not necessarily Indian sources). The article cites some of those sources.
2970:
The problem is that the term is a mess of geology, geography, and political identities and these regions, particularly Afghanistan, have strong historical ties with the region. The second problem is that, by having separate articles on South Asia and the Indian subcontinent, we're twisting ourselves
2590:
Merge discussion happened long time back with consensus that this article is about the geological/geograpical entity and South Asia is about the political/geopolitical entity. That is why this one doesn't require the continent infobox. The difference between these two entities is not Afghanistan. It
1472:
Essentially yes, I don't see Aditya emphasising and bringing this undue quagmire on this page constructive in any way. These terms are best mentioned as suggested or very rare names as mentioning those as alternative names gives readers a false notion that these terms have significant use in general
1244:
futile accusations of teaming. I assume you have not read "Assume good faith, and keep in mind that in almost all cases it is better to address other editors' reasoning than it is to accuse them of being on a team. Unsubstantiated accusations of tag teaming are uncivil. Care should be taken to frame
612:
Well as far as I understand, these two sentences are perfectly in compliance of every Knowledge standard (my understanding only, could be wrong), and almost all the opposition are in violation of multiple policies and guidelines. At that I may have done the right thing. But I am pretty sure I didn't
5737:
South Asia has been suffering from Indian domination for too long, mate. As far as I know, a lot of countries are now using "South Asian Subcontinent" instead of "Indian Subcontinent" to describe this region. This is a correct move, hopefully, more mainstream media will start to use the term "South
5718:
That link claims the first use of the term was in 1952, which is obviously incorrect. If you want to convince people to make this change to the article you're going to need a better source than a dictionary. In any case, we list alternative names in the 'Name' subection, where they can be presented
4996:
This is an edit I could just do but the topic is oddly sensitive. Use of the term “Indian Subcontinent” is “increasingly less” used. The phrase is strange to the ear. Can something be “increasingly less”? No easy change immediately comes to mind, perhaps “used less frequently”. I think a change is
4271:
The Indian subcontinent usually is used interchangeably with South Asia but the Indian subcontinent usually refers to the part of south asia that was a part of British Raj after WW2. As the British never fully controlled Afghanistan it isn't technically a part of the Indian subcontinent. However it
3850:
I am not sure if you really understood how things went down, but if there is no consensus the article indeed goes back to the status quo/the initial version, which is the version prior to you edits, as all of this only became a thing due to your forcefully putting in things into the article without
3799:
While the "no Afghanistan" block were busy fighting it out here (and in the past edit wars) to exclude Afghanistan, an annon had added it to the lead (along with BIOT), and no one noticed. It stayed there for days, until I removed it. Hilarious. By the way, the same block tried removing Afghanistan
3432:
Not at all, both the terms have sufficient distinctions mentioned in their independent coverages that we will be botching the entire topic even if considering any merger. Article anyway needs great amount of expansion relevant to geography what isn't really a problem if someone decides to work upon
597:
The interesting part is all of the editors disputing the content have kept removing increasing amount of material, all containing completely different information, and kept pretending that all were covered by the discussion for the first removal, which removed the least amount of material. The last
5513:
Yeah, which is already included in the lede of the South Asia article. Yet what one effectively defunct government considers, doesn't equal to what literally a vast corpus of non-defunct governmental and non-governmental institutions (including South Asia Studies programs) assert, i.e. putting the
5449:
The current situation is that the Afghan people consider their country as a part of Central Asia, the previous Afghan government (Islamic Republic) considers Afghanistan to be a transregional country which is a part of both Central Asia and South Asia. The position of the current Afghan government
3635:
also already made some good valid point why it doesn’t belong into the lede, why do you want everyone to re-write their comments now? Also if I remember correctly you more or less tended to agree about not including Afghanistan in the lede but instead elaborating on its ambiguous geography further
2556:
I was thinking of putting the line after "The precise definition of an "Indian subcontinent" in a geopolitical context is somewhat contested as there is no globally accepted definition on which countries are a part of South Asia or the Indian subcontinent. Whether called the Indian subcontinent or
1733:
weren't in the sentence at all. It's my experience that Knowledge editors pay more attention than others, so if they're skipping that word, then we should assume that a busy/distracted reader will get it wrong. The solution is to write more sentences. Imagine a paragraph that begins, "_____ are
1453:
isn't incorrect at all. These newly suggested terms have only found place in cherrypicked sources and are outpaced in prevalence by far if you use google results against existing name and aren't mentioned in sufficient frequency to be even noted on Knowledge. These names are essentially induced by
1150:
Moreover, nobody is arguing over the complete exclusion of Afghanistan in the article. As the article now stands, Afghanistan is talked about further down in a quite detailed section that perfectly suffices. It is unclear and vague why this state of affairs should undergo any alterations. Regards.
1018:
in the lead. The information is controversial and of uncertain nature. Just by judging by the fact that such a strong opposition has spontaneously risen to its inclusion one can see the reason for why it should not be included. This information is not accepted by all sources and the lead should be
3616:
for now, and request that you state the reason for your opposition. It is understood that Afghanistan is not generally included, but why stating exactly that should be excluded from the lead? Please, don't go posting cites, again, to prove Afghanistan doesn't belong, that's beyond the point here.
3604:
By the way, the version you opposed to have been proposed on October 3. You have commented in the discussion on October 8 without any mention of the proposal (which was supported by more than half the participating editors by that time). You commented only after I proposed to incorporate the text
3312:
Also the paragraph "Geologically, the Indian subcontinent ... Geographically, it is Geopolitically, the Indian subcontinent includes ..." should be removed in its entirety. It is both OR and Synthesis, witness the need for seven citations. It is not a good idea to conflate the "subcontinent" (a
3300:
I am sure we can smooth out these kinks out of our discussion/decision pretty easily. And, hey, thanks for joining. By the way, I had proposed to merge South Asia and Indian subcontinent quite some time back, and had taken some flak for the attempt (telling so you know where my heart lies, but we
5095:
The qualifier added is only in reference to the image it that is in use. I'm sure the reader would have an easy time understanding that the subcontinent has geographical as well as geopolitical connotations. This is in the lede. This is what is mentioned. If you believe it will confuse a reader,
3699:
I strongly disagree with the inclusion of Afghanistan in the lead of this article. The framing of Afghanistan as apart of the subcontinent is very shaky. Subjective aspects to the Subcontinent's classifications are best left to be addressed in later sections of the article. The introductory lead
3650:
I agrred to anything that had the agreement of a large number of editors, with valid reasons, including yours. That doesn't make your POV any more special than others. Stop repeating "you agreed", it is an absolutely lame reason to include or exclude something in an article. As for the very good
3478:
A merge at first seems like a good idea, however in a merged article the eternal on going discussions and edit wars about Afghanistan(not only the recent incidents, this happens regularly) will escalate even more, because Afghanistan is included in the South Asia article in the core definition (
3834:
By the way, if this not closed with a consensus then the article goes back to state before the war as per policies. That means concessions made to the contentious sentences will not be accomodated. We have waited three months for a consensus (over three discussion threads), long enough to apply
3419:
agrees. And I have tried a merger proposal already in the past. Perhaps there is reason enough discuss a merger again. If we again decide that Indian subcontinent is a geographical entity and South Asia is a geopolitical entity then we should seriously improve the geography/geology parts of the
119:
results in reverting proposed text to the version before the proposal. As clearly as can be determined from the edit history, this proposal grows out of an edit war over the inclusion of the phrase, "...although the latter term is used typically as a political term and is also used to sometimes
1641:
However we can include Afghanistan below in other sections, my intentions are definitely not the complete exclusion of the two sentences. As long as it is not in the core definition in the lead and well sourced then it is alright academically. Scarcely Khestwol’s proposal how to do it is just
1114:
breaches the principle that the opening paragraph is reserved for context and "facts". As the occasional inclusiveness of Afghanistan means that it lies on shaky foundation and not foundations of certainty and distinction. The picture presented furthermore, as argued before by others, does not
593:
The sh*tty part is that "I" happen to be the only person who is still in the discussion (Santoshsatvik left in 11 September, and ArvindPalaskar left in 15 September, while rejecting the idea of taking the discussion to an RfC or a DRN). I also am the only person personally attacked in the edit
5810:
Before the freedom of all countries in subcontinent or Bareazam or before it's division it is called "Bareazam". And it also a right word describe " subcontinent" . The word Indian subcontinent is totally wrong because it's name was " Bareazam" and is also called " subcontinent" to refer all
3279:
If the subcontinent is defined only as a peninsula, then Nepal and Bhutan may become ineligible for inclusion. If it is defined as the land part of the Indian plate, then Sri Lanka and Maldives, as well as parts of Afghanistan and Myanmar fit fine. The coinage came from the Brits during their
5248:
The current version says "or simply, the subcontinent". While South Asian Subcontinent may be an alternate name, you're completely changing the meaning of the statement. Feel free to add South Asian Subcontinent (though, note that "per" the existence of a redirect is generally not a reliable
5073:
The article is titled "Indian subcontinent" and adding a qualifier the way you've done is confusing to the reader. Does there, for example, another Indian subcontinent that requires us to use a qualifer here? I'm also not sure that geopolitical fits but that's merely a secondary issue. ( Per
1462:
which refers to a distinct cultural region of Asia Pacific, too has been rendered as a name for the geographical entity by giving undue weight to a couple of sources. This term is best to be excluded for Indian subcontinent unless supported by at least 10 good sources. The article refers to
5186:
Eg. “Indian cuisine” refers to food from the “Indian subcontinent” but it only really includes Pakistani, Indian and Bangladeshi food. Food from Nepal and Bhutan wouldn’t be listed as “Indian food” despite supposedly being part of “the Indian subcontinent”. Whereas Pakistani and Bangladeshi
1220:
equal a negative assumption. Moreover, this absence of an affirmative (albeit it is not truly affirmative given that it is forwarded with "rarely") is later remedied in the same article under a different section. Otherwise, as already mentioned by myself and conveniently ignored by yourself
1581:
generally per Regentspark. The statement regarding Afghanistan, Maldives, and the like is well-sourced. A source emphasizing its exclusion can and should be mentioned in the article, but it does not preclude mentioning Afghanistan because other sources mention it in their discussion of the
1465:
Since the partition of India, citizens of Pakistan (which became independent of British India in 1947) and Bangladesh (which became independent of Pakistan in 1971) often perceive the use of "Indian subcontinent" as offensive and suspicious because of the dominant placement of India in the
807:
I think the RfC should ask "Should Afghanistan and the Maldives be included in the lead" and "Should 'Used interchangably with South Asia' be included in the lead" or something to that effect. That should cover the disputed text, unless I have been mistaken. I haven't been around since my
687:
The timestamp at the end of the case wouldn't have helped. The presence of the "Case" subheading itself would have screwed the RfC listing entry, even if other problems had been addressed. If that were removed, the statement would then have been something like 9,900 bytes long, which is a
1609:
sources that mention Afghanistan as a border territory or “sometimes” included in the definition. however after reading through all the opinions and thinking about it for a while I changed my view a little bit regarding the Myanmar and “south Asia and Indian subcontinent sometimes used
1763:
Thanks for the suggestions. I am sure we can work out something in those lines. Initially my concern was to keep the sentence with a list of countries short (as is probably due for a non-political geographical/geological entity). But that shortness may not be the best way to go.
1103:, "The first paragraph should define or identify the topic with a neutral point of view, but without being too specific." Now, this is not about my personal feeling towards the use of this or that adverb. This is about encyclopedic honesty in regards to presenting a topic from a
1280:
the same as saying that "it is never included" as you have implied to be the argument of those opposing your POV. I will not respond to the "teaming" accusation, because it is hard to see it as anything other than a weak attempt not to be taken seriously at this point. Cheers.
1133:, both on this page and on pages recently edited by your 'opponents" on pages with little to no relevance to your general habits of editing, show that perhaps you are not engaging in this affair with good faith. By doing what I cited above, you have shown that you have been
505:
Edit summary: "Aditya Kabir (talk) This is a controversial inclusion, if you feel that it must be included, it should be placed elsewhere and definitely not in the lead of the article which is next to a map and list of countries which mentions neither of the two countries."
3216:
Comment: Sorry, I did not see this earlier. The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Third Edition, 2009, (not Oxford Dictionary of English, which is a much shorter dictionary), the ultimate arbiter of the English language, especially British and Commonwealth usage, says this:
1329:
Geopolitically, the Indian subcontinent includes all or part of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, as well as Maldives, and rarely Afghanistan and Myanmar. The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "South Asia" are often used interchangeably to denote the
110:
This discussion is very unfocused and the RfC questions were mostly ignored by the majority of participants except for the narrow question of inclusion of Afghanistan and Myanmar in the lead's definition of the subcontinent. The result of that discussion is that there is
842:
The problem is that these edit warriors have not removed country names from the lead, they removed it from article altogether. But they are pretending that they are removing it only from the lead. The amount of lies and fake comments they are thrwoing is muddling up this
3222:
Also used with wider application to include Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives. The term is roughly equivalent to South Asia, esp. in the wider use, although Indian subcontinent is sometimes considered to be more of a geophysical description, and South Asia more
5888:
and should be capitalized. It refers to the southern region of Asia, which includes countries such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka. It is important to use proper capitalization when referring to specific geographic regions or proper nouns."
1613:
2557:
South Asia, the definition of the geographical extent of this region varies." Along with the fact that some sources, including the IMF, consider Maldives to be outside the Indian subcontinent, though rarely. I also have the geological context of Maldives ready in my
1624:
1619:
1522:, all other countries being pushed here have highly ambiguous status. It is thus quite safe to use GDP, population and area of these countries only for infobox. Indian subcontinent is a more tightly defined term than South Asia and largely certain to its references.
616:
Since this is not my personal battle to fight, I hope I can get the community involved to help this reach a consensus (may be three consensus, because this is about three different things disguised as one). Now pinging the editors I was advised to ask for help:
3294:
Time magazine and Katzner may be very clear, but they are not explicit, and perhaps not as clear as a plain list of countries described as part of Indian subcontinent. A lot many sources provide that list rather explicitly, without a need to take leaps in
2575:
I am fine with that suggestion of you, however let the previous statement of you about the Afghanistan untouched. We can discuss a merge of this article with South Asia as RegentsPark suggested elsewhere, for the first we need to find a solution for this.
3670:
I would support this wording. It's factually accurate, and from the point of view of someone with no dog in the fight, an impartial way of phrasing it. In fact, I don't like the "albeit", as that is verging on editorialising. I would just leave "rarely".
5518:. "South Asia" (or any other "region" of the world), is largely a geopolitical construct, of which Afghanistan is very much part of per a vast amount of WR:RS. There's not enough WP:RS to have it included as part of the term "Indian subcontinent" though.
3479:
which I don’t necessarily agree with but that’s another topic for itself) but it isn’t included in the core definition of the Indian subcontinent, how would we handle that ? That’s why I think for the first we shouldn’t merge, however we should merge
1057:"The information is controversial". To whom? The team that assumed reverting as an alternative to discussion? "This information is not accepted by all sources". Really? Is that argument? The sources, respectable and reliable, clearly says Afghanistan
5431:
doesn't automatically qualify Afghanistan to be a part of the region geographically. Japan can apply to join the EU if they want to and the EU has the option to accept or decline their application, just like Australia applied and got accepted by the
1185:
Which means, if a list of countries are there, it will be a comprehensive list. Which also means, if something is "rearely included" by RS it will be not become "never included" because a couple of editors want it to be that way, even if they form a
5368:
The real controversial part is the inclusion of Afghanistan in South Asia. I have never met an Afghan person who actually considers their country to be a part of South Asia. If Afghanistan is included, we may as well include Iran in South Asia too.
1629:
4627:"If we included modern nation-states that have cultural continuities with an earlier Indian empire, the Mughal empire, we might look to the area of Persian influence and include modern Afghanistan and even Iran in our subject matter."
5401:. As it stands, an overwhelming number of governmental and non-governmental institutions (including South Asia Studies programs) put Afghanistan into South Asia, something which is not the case for Iran. Afghanistan is even part of
4588:"The subcontinent of South Asia consists of the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. To these we may add parts of Afghanistan, Tibet and Burma that clearly fall into the Indic civilisation sphere."
4443:"The subcontinent of South Asia consists of the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. To these we may add parts of Afghanistan, Tibet and Burma that clearly fall into the Indic civilisation sphere."
4122:"The subcontinent of South Asia consists of the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. To these we may add parts of Afghanistan, Tibet and Burma that clearly fall into the Indic civilisation sphere."
2836:"The subcontinent of South Asia consists of the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. To these we may add parts of Afghanistan, Tibet and Burma that clearly fall into the Indic civilisation sphere."
2359:"The subcontinent of South Asia consists of the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. To these we may add parts of Afghanistan, Tibet and Burma that clearly fall into the Indic civilisation sphere."
2280:"The subcontinent of South Asia consists of the nations of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives. To these we may add parts of Afghanistan, Tibet and Burma that clearly fall into the Indic civilisation sphere."
120:
include Afghanistan and Myanmar." The prior version, therefore, would exclude this phrase. Attempts to focus on the other issues raised should be addressed through much more narrowly-defined discussions. A thorough reading of
5182:
Although the Indian Subcontinent CAN include all of the countries stated, I think it’s important to note that a lot of the time it’s used to refer JUST to what USED to be “India” ie modern day India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
1118:
Part of encyclopedic honesty (I don't think it is necessary to point towards specific legislation here) is to follow consensus of the 'encyclopedians' involved. In regards to this, there was already a consensus reached in
3220:"Indian subcontinent n. the part of Asia south of the Himalayas which forms a peninsula extending into the Indian Ocean between the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal, now divided between India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.
3725:
Is that an Knowledge guideline? I thought it was about being "accurate", "verifiable" and "relevant", not "unanimous". Almost nothing is unanimous in this world, not even biological evolution or existence of god.
594:
summaries. And I also made three of the 10 reverts made since ArvindPalaskar's edit. Looks like my personal war, though I believe I have stayed within every single WP policy and guideline (I may be wrong though).
5925:
ChatGPT's responses don't give you correct answers, only those that sound like they are correct. "Indian subcontinent" is the correct term to use much like you wouldn't capitalist the letter 'M' in "Indian man"
3782:
Lol. Though, I'm beginning to understand why, despite the preponderance of evidence that Afghanistan is often included in references to the Indian subcontinent, there is this aversion to saying so on Knowledge!
3236:
It is clear in these examples, that in the primary sense, Sri Lanka and the Maldives are not part of the subcontinent (Colombo was just as busy a port as Bombay; the southernmost tip of the subcontinent speaks
1141:, and bringing the matter (which, for some reason, you appear to be taking personally) elsewhere on the encyclopedia, and providing little reasoning for doing so. Under wikipedia's internal legislature this is
1037:
Thanks for finally joining the discussion. It is never too late. About the reason for opposition, I would like to remind that "such a strong opposition has spontaneously risen" either is a misunderstanding of
4575:"South Asia is sometimes referred to as the Indian subcontinent of the Indo-Pak Subcontinent, and comprises the modern nation states of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka."
4430:"South Asia is sometimes referred to as the Indian subcontinent of the Indo-Pak Subcontinent, and comprises the modern nation states of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka."
4109:"South Asia is sometimes referred to as the Indian subcontinent of the Indo-Pak Subcontinent, and comprises the modern nation states of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka."
2823:"South Asia is sometimes referred to as the Indian subcontinent of the Indo-Pak Subcontinent, and comprises the modern nation states of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka."
2346:"South Asia is sometimes referred to as the Indian subcontinent of the Indo-Pak Subcontinent, and comprises the modern nation states of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka."
2267:"South Asia is sometimes referred to as the Indian subcontinent of the Indo-Pak Subcontinent, and comprises the modern nation states of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka."
1265:? I am sure you have noticed how other editors voiced their opinion against the preference of your team, reverted edits by the team, and even prtected the article against the team. Play by the rules, please.
5907:
As often happens, ChatGPT gave you a crap response. "Indian subcontinent" is an informal term without a complete consensus as to its precise limits or definition, and as such is not customarily capitalized.
4297:
We just had an RfC on this issue. Another RfC right away, without any real substantive discussion about whether this compromise could work, is against the spirit and wording of our policies and guidelines.
3231:
1975 K. Katzner Langs. of World ii. 199 Tamil..is spoken principally in the state of Tamil Nadu (formerly Madras), located on the eastern coast and extending down to the southernmost tip of the Indian
1586:
signifies there is disagreement over whether it belongs. The South Asia statement is also well sourced. It may be incorrect, but what reliable sources say is more important than our own opinions. --
5777:
5742:
5645:
5587:
1490:
for inclusion of Afghanistan in lead. Inclusion of Afghanistan is the core difference between very definitions of South Asia and Indian subcontinent. Unduly emphasing its rare mentions is just
676:
Really!! Dang. I thought ghere was a timestamp at the end of the case, which is the statement. Is that inappropriate? What would make it valid? A section called "statement" with a timestamp?
1706:
My understanding is that culturally, Afghanistan is not within the subcontinent, but geologically, the portion of Afghanistan that's to the southeast of the Hindu Kush would be within it.—
5811:
countries when in it before division. Indian subcontinent name is totally wrong because it refers only one country India.It should be " subcontinent " because we're part of it too.
846:
Also there are progressively more and more information removed, though they are pretending that they are removing the same information. It is so distressing to see thie team in action.
4653:, what bearing would the ongoing RfC have on the italicization of these terms one way or another? And the majority of the edit didn't pertain to content affected by the RfC, did it?
5427:
Well, it's a fact. Afghan communities can be found all over Western countries, this fact can be easily verified by having a conversation with them on the streets. Being a member of
1261:
Now the reliable sources explicitly including Afghanistan in Indian subcontinent is "a lack of an affirmative proposition"! Interesting. As for your continued attack... may I offer
1175:
that make up your comment. I also will ignore that your comment is netither about the topic in discussion, nor about the comment I made, rather it is about an editor you don't like.
365:
It has also been called the "Asian Subcontinent", the "Indian Subcontinent", or the "Indo-Pak subcontinent", as well as India or Greater India in the classical and pre-modern sense.
5391:
I have never met an Afghan person who actually considers their country to be a part of South Asia. (...) The real controversial part is the inclusion of Afghanistan in South Asia."
1232:
responded to the inevitability of internal contradiction in the lead section if Afghanistan is included, instead you have regarded this as just another conspiracy against you by a
5621:"Geopolitically, it includes the republics of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka." This reads wrong to me as Bhutan is a kingdom, not a republic.
2004:
3700:
paragraphs of this article should only contain definite information such as Pakistan's inclusion into the subcontinent, which is unanimously accepted among all commentators.
3291:
article for a long time to be aware that the term is neither applied exclusively to the Subcontinent nor is widely used anymore. But neither warrants an exclusion of the term.
605:". I promised to address that here: well, when I made my first edit to this article after years (as well as thousands of prior edits by other editors), all of the sentences
1670:
When a source explicitly and unambiguosly says something, it is not cherrypicking the source (read the page you linked). BTW, what earlier consensus are you talking about?
1216:
In regards to the only thing you said about the article: you hyperbolic usage of "never included" betrays a basic logical fallacy. The lack of an affirmative proposition
3317:. Baluchistan is not on the Indian plate, but is in the subcontinent; Mustang in Nepal is not on the Indian plate, whether or not Nepal is in the Indian subcontinent.
1962:; Quote: "The term people of the South continent refers to populations originating from the Indian subcontinent, effectively India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka;
4562:"The Indian Subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, bounded on the north by the great ranges of the Himalaya."
4417:"The Indian Subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, bounded on the north by the great ranges of the Himalaya."
4096:"The Indian Subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, bounded on the north by the great ranges of the Himalaya."
2810:"The Indian Subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, bounded on the north by the great ranges of the Himalaya."
2333:"The Indian Subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, bounded on the north by the great ranges of the Himalaya."
2254:"The Indian Subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, bounded on the north by the great ranges of the Himalaya."
5484:
Well, it's a fact. Afghan communities can be found all over Western countries, this fact can be easily verified by having a conversation with them on the streets."
3462:. That's supposed to be the geology part. Indian subcontinent and South Asia are used interchangeably in practice, with modern usage trending toward South Asia. --
880:
Since there is no discussion or consensus building or presentation of arguments by the PoV team, I guess, it is alright to reinstate the following in the lead per
4038:
4016:
3994:
2752:
2730:
2708:
2167:
2142:
2117:
1610:
interchangeably“ part though. A quick search among academic scholarly books will give you only the core nations with Myanmar and Indian ocean Islands mentioned:
275:
Use reverting as an alternative to discussion (especially in an article under DS)? ... 5 reverts and 0 discussion (all of them aware of DS) and a declaration to
538:
Edit summary: "Afghanistan should not be listed in the beginning but its occasional inclusion should be explained further below (my conclusion from talk page)"
2521:
This is confusing. How can the two terms be interchangeable when one does not include Afghanistan? The wording which Aditya initially suggested seems better.
3280:
imperial times, and is interpreted slightly differently by different acedemics and commentators. The article describes some of the arguments around the term.
3351:
I too believe that merging this article with South Asia is the best way forward. At least we all are in agreement that Afghanistan is part of South Asia. --
1426:
to continue edti warring. Interesting to see that it is possible on the Knowledge to declare your TEAM and its disruptive intentions, and get away with it.
4529:"Burma (Myanmar) was not only physically and historically identified with the Indian subcontinent, but it also shared India’s commitment to neutrality."
4384:"Burma (Myanmar) was not only physically and historically identified with the Indian subcontinent, but it also shared India’s commitment to neutrality."
4063:"Burma (Myanmar) was not only physically and historically identified with the Indian subcontinent, but it also shared India’s commitment to neutrality."
2777:"Burma (Myanmar) was not only physically and historically identified with the Indian subcontinent, but it also shared India’s commitment to neutrality."
2300:"Burma (Myanmar) was not only physically and historically identified with the Indian subcontinent, but it also shared India’s commitment to neutrality."
2221:"Burma (Myanmar) was not only physically and historically identified with the Indian subcontinent, but it also shared India’s commitment to neutrality."
208:
Asian Subcontinent", the "Indian Subcontinent", or the "Indo-Pak subcontinent", as well as India or Greater India in the classical and pre-modern sense"
3659:
that most authors exclude Afghanistan – and that is so irrelevant a point here (everyone knows that, and that's what is written in the proposed text).
231:
The same three editors are removing it repeatedly while pretending they are removing only the names of Maldives, Afghanistan and Myanmar from the lead.
219:
The same three editors are removing it repeatedly while pretending they are removing only the names of Maldives, Afghanistan and Myanmar from the lead.
3562:
If we don't have any other objection that was already not discussed, I probably should edit the text into the article. This has gone on for too long.
308:
4907:; Quote: "The term South Asian refers to populations originating from the Indian subcontinent, effectively India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka;
4169:; Quote: "The term South Asian refers to populations originating from the Indian subcontinent, effectively India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka;
2883:; Quote: "The term South Asian refers to populations originating from the Indian subcontinent, effectively India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka;
304:
5096:
perhaps a map underneath in terms of physical geography would suffice. The problem we have here is that we have two definitions and only one image.
303:(added) I couldn't also help noticing that this group of editors, despite being new to Knowledge, shows remarkable similrity in editing (example:
4970:
The Himalayas are actually not part of the Indian subcontinent. They are merely the border between the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
977:(part of ancient India) and from the 16th to the 18th century, Kabul was mostly ruled from the Indian Mughal Empire which was centered at Delhi.
315:), and have been accused of being each other's socks/meats, as well as of disruptive edits, over many noticeboards and talk pages (some example:
3605:
into the article, after waiting a while to see if someone disagrees (I even pinged dissenting editors to comment). I hope nobody sees this as a
3228:
1905 Times 10 Nov. 5/1 The busy harbour ..has become the chief centre of direct communication between Europe and the Indian sub-continent.
1631:“Afghanistan is disconnected from the subcontinent and considers itself a Central asian nation that connect Central asia to South Asia” page 33
1286:
1250:
1156:
1115:
highlight Afghanistan in any way, which means the lead will have internal contradictions if Afghanistan is included literally but not visually.
1024:
1000:
5675:
I’m not sure why this was ever in dispute anyway, to the person that reverted my edit. Why do you think it’s called the INDIAN subcontinent?
5348:
2195:
1276:
You have misread my comment. "Lack of an affirmative proposition" was referring to the exclusion of Afghanistan in the lead and how this is
5602:
5568:
5451:
4743:
because they are often used interchangeably as the sources provided by OP show. (Not that we need sources for something fairly obvious). --
4654:
633:. I have completely run out of depth, and am highly doubtful of my own conduct. If you find me guilty of anything, I stand guilty already.
5790:
The "accepted Indian Map" is irrelevant to whatever the consensus of reliable sources say. India is not the world, there are other views.
5134:
Any way we can use a switcher like the European page? Doesn't seem to allow for continental infobox pictures to have captions underneath.
3444:
I think that we generally benefit from having separate articles about geology and politics, especially when the borders aren't identical.
3276:
It would be difficult to maintain that the ultimate arbiter of English is also the ultimate arbiter of geography (political or otherwise).
1333:
that includes accurately summarizing the boundaries of a geographical region and areas that are sometimes included should be mentioned. --
609:. I only added the most well sourced and and well cited two words to it, "Indo-Pak subcontinent", while reducing five sentences to three.
5893:
5856:
4977:
1692:. Article is not supposed to mix up South Asia and Indian subcontinent but define how Indian subcontinent stands as a separate concept.
5781:
5761:
The map used doesn't show complete India. The Gilgit Baltistan and Aksai Chin are considered part of India as per accepted Indian Map.
5746:
5649:
5812:
5591:
1046:(though a lot of edit summaries assumed it to be a battle, with even declarations of continuing the war). It is seriously not about a
69:
64:
59:
1838:
5622:
5294:
4942:
4930:
4917:
4904:
4891:
4878:
4710:
4624:
4611:
4598:
4585:
4572:
4559:
4546:
4526:
4440:
4427:
4414:
4401:
4381:
4203:
4191:
4179:
4166:
4154:
4141:
4119:
4106:
4093:
4080:
4060:
3950:
3632:
3088:
2917:
2905:
2893:
2880:
2868:
2855:
2833:
2820:
2807:
2794:
2774:
2664:
2356:
2343:
2330:
2317:
2297:
2277:
2264:
2251:
2238:
2218:
2070:
2046:
2027:
1996:
1984:
1972:
1959:
1947:
1934:
1908:
1896:
1884:
1865:
1846:
1825:
1559:
Are we trying to make Indian subcontinent a smaller version of South Asia? Otherwise why are we discussing GDP etc. out of nowhere?
1441:
against the inclusion of alternative terms in existing form. Arvind Palaskar's claim about notability and general use of terms like
1282:
1246:
1152:
1020:
996:
153:
There's an edit war happening at this article by editors who are not participating in any discussion despite repeated requests. The
3715:
3651:
valid point by شاه عباس, isn't it apparent that you can agree only to the lone editor who is on your side of the dispute? Do not
3136:
No further input. I am ok with all the solutions proposed in this section. All this seems to me to be much ado about nothing. --
1717:
1110:
The inclusion of Afghanistan breaches neutrality in several ways. First of all, the lack of unequivocal inclusion in the sources
1085:" – I didn't get where that standard came from (or what you really mean by it), but curious to know if it is coming from . Is it?
3154:
as discussed below. There could be further opposition in future against including Afghanistan as part of Indian subcontinent. --
1305:
Consensus was to not have Afghanistan listed in the infobox. Please do not misconstrue the discussion and/or my own comments. --
5826:"Indian subcontinent" is a widely sourced term. And is also the common name of the land mass. There is no point changing it. -
5110:
Is there some way of captioning only the image and not the infobox? I see a caption attribute but it doesn't seem to show up.--
144:
3957:, 2001; p. 929: "the part of Asia south of the Himalayas which forms a peninsula extending into the Indian Ocean, between the
2671:, 2001; p. 929: "the part of Asia south of the Himalayas which forms a peninsula extending into the Indian Ocean, between the
2077:, 2001; p. 929: "the part of Asia south of the Himalayas which forms a peninsula extending into the Indian Ocean, between the
4676:
2602:
I shouldn't have brought that up :). Let's table the merge for the time being because this is complicated enough as it is. --
560:
Edit summery: "Aditya Kabir (talk) too specific to be included in lead. this looks like the obsessive editing of one person"
93:
5901:
4319:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1019:
for the information that is certain and unequivocal, the rest is part of the discussion of the topic not its introduction.
4961:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4460:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4222:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5586:
Saudi Arabia lies in the western part of the Asian continent at the junction of the European Asian and African continent
5433:
4920:
Quote: "The complex culture of the Indian subcontinent, or South Asia, presents a tradition comparable to Confucianism."
4277:
3942:
2656:
2062:
1245:
assertions in an appropriate way, citing evidence in the appropriate venues, following our dispute resolution process."
744:
The number of removals now stand at 11 (from the 10 I posted above), the number of discussion participation still zero.
4549:"The Indian subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and the Maldives."
4404:"The Indian subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and the Maldives."
4083:"The Indian subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and the Maldives."
2797:"The Indian subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and the Maldives."
2320:"The Indian subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and the Maldives."
2241:"The Indian subcontinent comprises Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh Sri Lanka and the Maldives."
5766:
5459:
5374:
4700:
324:
131:
3150:
Have no objection to the solution. Although if you ask me, a permanent solution would be to merge this article with
5831:
5514:
country in South Asia. Hence the effectively defunct government's statement is correctly shown as just a note, per
5499:
5397:
Unfortunately, your IRL experiences don't count as a source on Knowledge. On Knowledge, articles are written using
5078:
would you please get consensus on the talk page of an article when someone reverts a bold addition you've made?) --
4787:
3801:
3323:
3255:
2558:
38:
3965:. Historically forming the whole territory of Greater India, the region is now divided into three countries named
2679:. Historically forming the whole territory of Greater India, the region is now divided into three countries named
2535:
Ehhhm, that text I quoted was written by Aditya... Also the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, not always.
2085:. Historically forming the whole territory of Greater India, the region is now divided into three countries named
1729:, so I recommend separate sentences. For example, several editors have read the existing proposal as if the word
380:
Note 2: The sentence that was remove by ArvindPalaskar was already in the article as two different sentences (one
312:
4769:
4260:
3617:
Other users who oppose are also invited to state their reasons. I hope the reasons will be as valid, if not more.
1043:
601:
The sh*tty part is so sh*tty that one of the editors Deepfriedokra suggested me to go to, Vanamonde93, observed "
520:
On 15th September, Deepfriedokra protected the page from any edit for 2 days, reverting it to the wrong version (
200:
it from the article altogether, and not just the lead while pretending they are removing it just from the lead.}}
5945:
5931:
5352:
4658:
4601:"Historically, Afghanistan was a boundary territory, part of Central Asia and part of the Indian subcontinent."
3825:
is back with the mission to remove Afghanistan, the White-race country, from South Asia, the Dark-race region (
47:
17:
5606:
5572:
3433:
it. For me as I told before, don't have time and I may take a while before I start editing again like before.
3287:
seems to be the right thing to do on the Knowledge, irrespective of how we judge the names. I have edited the
316:
5897:
4981:
1081:, with all those sources and more telling otherwise. "lead should be for the information that is certain and
5860:
5816:
5762:
4273:
4236:
3954:
3337:
2668:
2074:
1697:
1606:
995:
important enough and bears enough weight to be the first thing a reader sees when clicking on this article.
5941:
5927:
5626:
5455:
5370:
5331:
5051:
3886:
3594:
3449:
3174:
1743:
1039:
163:
147:
5840:"We" who? This is the English page for a subcontinent. The word in your language is totally irrelevant.
5827:
5641:
5526:
5410:
5255:
5116:
5084:
4783:
4749:
4248:
4232:
3836:
3789:
3590:
3468:
3076:
2977:
2608:
1339:
881:
116:
3408:
3318:
3250:
5187:
restaurants will be labelled as “Indian restaurants”, Nepali restaurants are labelled as “Nepalese”.
4706:
2971:
into knots trying to explain the difference, when the differences in usage are almost non-existent. --
5915:
5552:
5548:
5316:
5227:
5223:
5210:
5206:
5196:
5192:
5163:
5139:
5101:
4973:
4804:
4763:
4254:
3890:
3760:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3435:
3284:
3100:
1713:
1550:
1524:
1475:
1237:
1142:
944:
420:
The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "South Asia" is often used interchangeably to denote the region.
5705:
5676:
5043:
5021:
4835:
4303:
3856:
3676:
3652:
3641:
3606:
3580:
3488:
3141:
2581:
2540:
2512:
1661:
1495:
1382:
1361:
1202:
777:
727:
660:
226:
The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "South Asia" is often used interchangeably to denote the region
141:
5892:
Whoever invented this term initially obviously made a grammatical error. Why don't we correct it?
3685:
If someone still have not commented, there are only five more days left for this RfC to go stale.
5709:
5680:
5326:
It looks like you figured out how to edit the page source. Let us know if you still need help. --
5298:
5220:
5002:
3108:
3061:
2996:
2938:
I'm not sure about this. My preference would be to include both in the lead. Perhaps as follows:
2526:
1693:
1463:
geographical region which lies on Indo-Australian while South Asia is for a geopolitical region.
1078:
982:
693:
626:
121:
789:
Ending disruption is purpose enough. Please, do not make personal attacks your signature style.
177:
Since there is a list of countries that belong to region in the lead, is it alright to include "
3873:. Since you are so hung up on the dishonest notion that I put that in, shall I remove the part
432:
that added more unsourced material without addressing those tagged (none were ever addressed).
370:
Edit summary: "WP:UNDUE terms. Greater India & South Asia further have their definitions."
292:
along with more smear and a clear awareness of policies (despite complete disregard for them).
5724:
5695:
5327:
5047:
4939:
4927:
4914:
4901:
4888:
4875:
4729:
4621:
4608:
4595:
4582:
4569:
4556:
4543:
4523:
4482:
4437:
4424:
4411:
4398:
4378:
4337:
4200:
4188:
4176:
4163:
4151:
4138:
4116:
4103:
4090:
4077:
4057:
3947:
3894:
3840:
3812:
3772:
3727:
3686:
3660:
3621:
3598:
3563:
3445:
3421:
3341:
3302:
3170:
3126:
3120:
3046:
2914:
2902:
2890:
2877:
2865:
2852:
2830:
2817:
2804:
2791:
2771:
2661:
2592:
2572:
2562:
2495:
2452:
2353:
2340:
2327:
2314:
2294:
2274:
2261:
2248:
2235:
2215:
2192:
2067:
2043:
2024:
1993:
1981:
1969:
1956:
1944:
1931:
1905:
1893:
1881:
1862:
1843:
1822:
1765:
1760:
1739:
1671:
1560:
1538:
1455:
1428:
1266:
1206:
1089:
950:
929:
853:
802:
790:
759:
745:
677:
637:
603:
as far as I can see, those terms were not in the lead prior to your involvement in the article
578:
336:
293:
238:
158:
5845:
5795:
5522:
5406:
5281:
5250:
5111:
5079:
4870:
4744:
4650:
4133:
3784:
3463:
3412:
3071:
2972:
2847:
2603:
2186:
2003:
The named reference "mcleodplus" was defined multiple times with different content (see the
1926:
1645:
1626:
Core nations are only mentioned + additional nations are mentioned but again not Afghanistan
1621:
Core nations are only mentioned + additional nations are mentioned but again not Afghanistan
1374:
1353:
1334:
1262:
1172:
630:
622:
5949:
5935:
5920:
5864:
5849:
5835:
5820:
5799:
5785:
5770:
5750:
5728:
5713:
5699:
5684:
5653:
5630:
5610:
5595:
5576:
5556:
5530:
5463:
5414:
5378:
5356:
5335:
5320:
5260:
5231:
5214:
5200:
5167:
5143:
5121:
5105:
5089:
5055:
5025:
5006:
4985:
4839:
4822:
4808:
4791:
4774:
4754:
4734:
4714:
4662:
4487:
4342:
4307:
4281:
4265:
4240:
3899:
3860:
3845:
3817:
3794:
3777:
3764:
3732:
3719:
3691:
3680:
3665:
3645:
3626:
3584:
3568:
3492:
3473:
3453:
3439:
3426:
3361:
3346:
3328:
3307:
3260:
3178:
3164:
3145:
3131:
3081:
3065:
3051:
3000:
2982:
2613:
2597:
2585:
2567:
2544:
2530:
2516:
2500:
1770:
1747:
1721:
1701:
1676:
1665:
1592:
1565:
1554:
1543:
1528:
1479:
1433:
1408:
1386:
1365:
1344:
1311:
1290:
1271:
1254:
1211:
1160:
1094:
1088:
But thanks for talking and not reverting. It is definitely an refreshing change in events.
1028:
1004:
986:
955:
858:
818:
795:
781:
764:
750:
731:
682:
664:
642:
583:
341:
298:
243:
5909:
5312:
5159:
5135:
5097:
5068:
4800:
3822:
3756:
3112:
2403:
Break down the first sentence, and keep the seven countries commonly included in the lead:
1735:
1707:
1689:
1582:
subcontinent. It just means that there is debate over its inclusion. The term "rarely" in
1168:
1051:
809:
649:
3631:
Everything from the opposition has been already mentioned, you can read through it again
1548:
Those essentially are for two different concerns. Split them for degree of disagreement.
479:
Edit summary: "Per the Talk, doesn’t belong in the lead, already explained further down"
5547:
Balochisan and FATA of pakistan does not lies in Indian Subcontinent please remove them
3877:
about how Afghanistan may not be a part of the Subcontinent? Shall I also reinstate the
3415:
have spontaneously suggested a merger potential of Indian subcontinent into South Asia.
770:
This isn't a creative writing competition. The purpose of this RFC is not clear *at all*
5738:
Asian Subcontinent" and eventually "Indian Subcontinent" will become a historical term.
5033:
5017:
4831:
4299:
3852:
3672:
3637:
3576:
3484:
3404:
3137:
3116:
3092:
2577:
2551:
2536:
2508:
2476:
2444:
1756:
1657:
1378:
1357:
1187:
1179:
1100:
1047:
773:
720:
671:
653:
285:
136:
125:
5601:
It is irrelevant. Saudi Arabia is never considered a part of the Indian Subcontinent.
5042:. You will need to support your assertion with reliable sources and achieve consensus
5038:
It doesn't matter what you think as an editor. Knowledge is based in reliable sources
5515:
5243:
5075:
4998:
3962:
3613:
3416:
3354:
3288:
3157:
3104:
3057:
2992:
2676:
2522:
2082:
1491:
1459:
1401:
991:
978:
970:
1902:
What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics?: Analysing the Present State and Future Agenda
5720:
5691:
5667:
5637:
5495:
5398:
5039:
4817:
3480:
3459:
3400:
3314:
3096:
1652:
1587:
1306:
1120:
837:
813:
5274:
1494:
unless there are sources that essentially emphasise inclusion of Afghanistan into
1061:
a part of Indian subcontinent, while the article tones it down a lot by including
4881:; note: McLeod does not include Afghanistan in Indian subcontinent or South Asia;
4144:; note: McLeod does not include Afghanistan in Indian subcontinent or South Asia;
2858:; note: McLeod does not include Afghanistan in Indian subcontinent or South Asia;
965:
with Aditya. Afghanistan (at least its eastern area, including its largest city,
5885:
5841:
5791:
5664:
I don’t know how to add citations in wiki articles, so I’ll post a source here:
4472:
4327:
3958:
3831:). That's a nice never-give-up spirit. Could continue until a topic ban someday.
3547:
3036:
2672:
2462:
2078:
1878:
Nuclear Non-proliferation Diplomacy: Nuclear Power Programmes in the Third World
1178:
Let me address the only bit about Knowledge content and guideline you address –
1015:
917:
618:
467:
206:
Does alternative names for the subject belong in the article, if not the lead ("
157:
happened right after this RfC was opened (still no participation, only revert).
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4614:"Geographically historically Afghanistan has been part of Indian subcontinent."
3800:
from South Asia and including it into Central Asia. Both unsuccessful. Perhaps
1236:. Is this really the level of honesty put forward? You have not justified your
5311:
article but it is not getting displayed correctly. Please correct it. Thanks!-
5308:
4723:
3966:
3555:
3519:
3151:
3008:
2941:
2680:
2486:
2410:
2086:
1499:
1054:. Faith in people-power over encyclopedic standards may be bit misplaced here.
936:
889:
435:
Note 2: The sentence that removed by Santoshsatvik was already in the article
5490:
Again, telling other users stuff like "it can be verified on the streets" is
5881:
why is the "Indian subcontinent" not capitalized, this is the answer I got:
3539:
3242:
3028:
2961:
2430:
1519:
1395:
909:
453:
On 14th September, Xerxes931 removed both the sentences removed earlier and
2188:
Public Interest Environmental Litigation in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh
1805:
1603:
4566:
The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE
4421:
The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE
4100:
The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE
3974:
3543:
3535:
3272:) While I can totally agree to you, I still can see a few problems here:
3032:
3024:
2965:
2957:
2814:
The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE
2688:
2434:
2426:
2337:
The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE
2258:
The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c.6500 BCE–200 CE
2094:
1515:
1498:(emphasise because existing sources emphasise its exclusion). Except for
974:
913:
905:
758:
The revert warriors continue to edit the article, still zero discussion.
463:
4799:
it definitely should belong to the article, As it's properly sourced. -
3589:
Indeed. An RfC can go on for 30 days before going stale. And in case of
2475:
No objection to the following remaining in the lead, now toned down per
1819:
Terrorist Attacks in Mumbai, India, and Implications for U. S. Interests
5878:
4894:
Quote: ""The term "South Asia" also signifies the Indian Subcontinent""
4476:
4331:
3620:
And... just in case, this RfC has about eight days to run out of time.
3551:
3246:
3040:
2466:
921:
513:
to work towards a consensus but didn't participate in the discussions.
471:
2379:
3885:
I made the edits? Do not mock someone else's efforts to keep up your
3523:
3514:
Looks like we have a consensus to include the following in the lead:
3012:
2945:
2414:
1503:
893:
598:
one that accused me of a personal agenda removed the maximum amount.
173:
The case is stated below. Against this case there are few questions:
5502:" you think you are. Its either verifiable with WP:RS, or its not.
5191:
and North India, and the other form, Carnatic, being South Indian.
1937:; note: McLeod does not include Afghanistan in Indian subcontinent
1616:
Core nations + additional nations are mentioned but not Afghanistan
973:). Historically, Kabul and eastern Afghanistan was part of ancient
5428:
5402:
3970:
3531:
3527:
3238:
3020:
3016:
2953:
2949:
2684:
2422:
2418:
2090:
1511:
1507:
1193:
The image that you think dictates WP guidelines, was put there by
1123:
which clearly is not being followed thoroughly or faithfully here.
966:
901:
897:
5307:
I just copied the names of the countries exactly as it is in the
3125:
Any further input on this? Looks like we are close to a closure.
1614:(page 1) 1.1 Introduction of Tectonics of the Indian Subcontinent
2369:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Doogh&oldid=979597222
888:
Geopolitically, the Indian subcontinent includes all or part of
5450:(Islamic Emirate) is unclear. As for the reliable sources, the
3313:
geographical synonym for the term "India" in British days) and
1121:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Talk:Indian_subcontinent#Afghanistan
272:
Use personal attacks in the edit summaries as a smear campaign?
5269:
1839:
Geography of the South Asian Subcontinent: A Critical Approach
196:
Three editors, constantly reverting and never discussing, are
184:
Three editors, constantly reverting and never discussing, are
25:
1223:
nobody is arguing over the complete exclusion of Afghanistan
1197:
signifies nothing. The consensus you talk about is just one
534:, along with more citations from other parts of the article.
4997:
worth it for quality control but realize this is exiguous.
4579:
A Guide to Information Sources in the Geographical Sciences
4434:
A Guide to Information Sources in the Geographical Sciences
4113:
A Guide to Information Sources in the Geographical Sciences
3518:
Generally, the Indian subcontinent includes all or part of
3007:
Generally, the Indian subcontinent includes all or part of
2827:
A Guide to Information Sources in the Geographical Sciences
2409:
Generally, the Indian subcontinent includes all or part of
2350:
A Guide to Information Sources in the Geographical Sciences
2271:
A Guide to Information Sources in the Geographical Sciences
4726:" are sometimes used interchangeably to denote the region.
3558:" are sometimes used interchangeably to denote the region.
2489:" are sometimes used interchangeably to denote the region.
2191:. Kluwer Law International. pp. 3 with footnotes 1 and 2.
1688:
Per Aman.kumar.goel. This is factually incorrect and also
1416:
The revert war continues, twice more since the RfC began.
1129:
and inconsiderate reverting and participating in numerous
969:) has often been included in the Indian subcontinent (and
5507:(...) of the previous Afghan government is a notable one"
3355:
3158:
1402:
5741:
Back to your question, no, Indian Subcontinent ≠ India.
4231:
Afghanistan 🇦🇫 is also a part of Indian subcontinent.
1892:, page 193, Indian Council of Historical Reseach, 2005,
5286:
4830:
considering that there are several sources backing it.
4646:
3878:
3870:
3866:
3829:
3826:
2561:. The broader Myanmar context is yet to be researched.
2368:
1423:
1419:
704:
698:
606:
602:
574:
563:
553:
541:
531:
514:
510:
498:
490:
482:
454:
446:
440:
429:
411:
410:
On 8 September, Santoshsatvik removed that part again,
403:
395:
389:
385:
374:
356:
351:
A very interesting thing is happening to this article:
332:
328:
320:
289:
276:
154:
4898:
Ethnicity, race, and health in multicultural societies
4160:
Ethnicity, race, and health in multicultural societies
2968:. Afghanistan and Myanmar are also sometimes included.
2874:
Ethnicity, race, and health in multicultural societies
1953:
Ethnicity, race, and health in multicultural societies
939:" are often used interchangeably to denote the region.
489:(Xerxes931 didn't participate). Gone into discussion (
3771:
Racial category!!! Now that is really scientific. :D
2443:
Move the rare inclusions into some other section per
2180:
2178:
1327:. I assume that the RfC is about these two sentences
5454:
of the previous Afghan government is a notable one.
4675:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
1201:
editor vehemently protesting, which doesn't imply a
92:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
5719:with proper context and without confusing readers.
5293:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
4816:
as the statement has many sources supporting it. --
4685:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1727:
I think you'll find it's more complicated than that
696:, and Legobot would have rejected it outright. But
636:Please... this needs serious outside intervention.
404:
Refactored the material to address the issue raised
102:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5284:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
5016:Hi, Myanmar is also a part of Indian Subcontinent
3056:Aditya I am OK with this one too. Seems balanced.
5567:angry, please change it immediately. (•̀へ •́ ╮ )
4227:Afghanistan is also a part of Indian subcontinent
3655:a discussion, that's not how you build consensus.
1537:Two "oppose" comments by one editor. That's new.
850:Any idea how to frame it in one or two questions?
425:Edit summary: "lets discuss this new edit first"
5776:They are disputed territories claimed by India.
5668:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/India
2940:the Indian subcontinent includes all or part of
2591:is the difference between geology and politics.
1890:Discourse on Indo European Languages and Culture
1137:the activities of the parties opposing your POV
5806:Subcontinent or Bareazam is right pronouncing:-
4926:, pages 465, Oxford University Press US, 2006,
4187:, pages 465, Oxford University Press US, 2006,
2901:, pages 465, Oxford University Press US, 2006,
1980:, pages 465, Oxford University Press US, 2006,
933:
886:
461:
418:
363:
5872:
5363:up of isolated oceanic islands (coral atolls).
4594:, page 698, Cambridge University Press, 2014,
3636:below, mind if I ask why that changed again ?
2399:The following looks like the consensus above.
85:A very long RfC, I hope it doesn't get ignored
5644:. Its foreign policy is controlled by India.
4913:, pages 133, Harvard University Press, 1985,
4688:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
4568:, page 33, Cambridge University Press, 2015,
4423:, page 33, Cambridge University Press, 2015,
4175:, pages 133, Harvard University Press, 1985,
4102:, page 33, Cambridge University Press, 2015,
2889:, pages 133, Harvard University Press, 1985,
2816:, page 33, Cambridge University Press, 2015,
2339:, page 33, Cambridge University Press, 2015,
2260:, page 33, Cambridge University Press, 2015,
1968:, pages 133, Harvard University Press, 1985,
1861:, page xiii, Harvard University Press, 2009,
1842:, page 17, Concept Publishing Company, 2009,
1099:Thank you for the response. In accordance to
266:Is it okay for the same group of editors to:
105:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
5660:“India” can refer to the entire subcontinent
4874:, page 1, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002,
4581:, page 115, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983,
4436:, page 115, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983,
4137:, page 1, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002,
4115:, page 115, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983,
2851:, page 1, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002,
2829:, page 115, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983,
2380:https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Tag_team#
2352:, page 115, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983,
2273:, page 115, Rowman & Littlefield, 1983,
2130:
2128:
2105:
2103:
1930:, page 1, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002,
1920:
1918:
1916:
652:: there is no statement and no timestamp. --
179:Maldives, and rarely Afghanistan and Myanmar
5690:Dictionaries aren't authoritative sources.
5636:Agreed. Bhutan is also the only modern-day
5285:
4900:, pages 33, Oxford University Press, 2007,
4522:, page 80, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003,
4377:, page 80, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003,
4162:, pages 33, Oxford University Press, 2007,
4056:, page 80, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003,
3070:A bit wordy, but sure. I'm fine with it. --
3035:. Albeit rarely, some authors also include
2876:, pages 33, Oxford University Press, 2007,
2770:, page 80, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003,
2293:, page 80, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003,
2214:, page 80, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003,
1955:, pages 33, Oxford University Press, 2007,
1904:, page 183, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013,
4971:
4844:
4616:Jacqueline Suthren Hirst and John Zavos,
4494:
4349:
3916:
3701:
3593:the article is supposed be go back to the
3546:.Albeit rarely, some authors also include
3387:
3205:
2630:
2451:section), and make the rarity obvious per
1780:
527:On 17th September the protection was over.
248:
4887:, pages 209, Taylor & Francis, 1988,
4885:The Third World: states of mind and being
4618:Religious Traditions in Modern South Asia
4471:Albeit rarely, some authors also include
4326:Albeit rarely, some authors also include
4150:, pages 209, Taylor & Francis, 1988,
4148:The Third World: states of mind and being
2864:, pages 209, Taylor & Francis, 1988,
2862:The Third World: states of mind and being
2461:Albeit rarely, some authors also include
2038:Kathleen M. Baker and Graham P. Chapman,
1943:, pages 209, Taylor & Francis, 1988,
1941:The Third World: states of mind and being
355:On 7th September, ArvindPalaskar removed
269:Constantly post dishonest edit summaries?
5873:Shouldn't it be the Indian Subcontinent?
4762:- properly sourced common sense indeed.
3752:Oppose including Afghanistan in the lead
3697:Oppose including Afghanistan in the lead
2155:
2153:
2056:
2054:
2021:Religions of South Asia: An Introduction
1806:Humanity's global battle with mosquitoes
5778:2001:8003:900C:5301:898B:4FEA:CDA1:CB8C
5743:2001:8003:900C:5301:898B:4FEA:CDA1:CB8C
5672:First definition provides affirmation.
5646:2001:8003:900C:5301:898B:4FEA:CDA1:CB8C
4924:The Oxford handbook of global religions
4861:
4607:, page 391, Atlantic Publishers, 2005,
4511:
4366:
4185:The Oxford handbook of global religions
4037:was invoked but never defined (see the
4015:was invoked but never defined (see the
3993:was invoked but never defined (see the
3933:
3851:any consensus. Is this your first RFC?
3554:. The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "
3390:
3208:
2899:The Oxford handbook of global religions
2751:was invoked but never defined (see the
2729:was invoked but never defined (see the
2707:was invoked but never defined (see the
2647:
2166:was invoked but never defined (see the
2141:was invoked but never defined (see the
2116:was invoked but never defined (see the
1978:The Oxford handbook of global religions
1859:Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia
1797:
251:
193:If not, do they belong in the article?
5704:Merriam-Webster is a reliable source.
5588:2409:4064:E88:8936:5D98:CBDD:7F90:72B3
4721:
4470:
4325:
3517:
2484:
2460:
2408:
1464:
1167:I will, for now, ignore the breach of
573:Gone to Deepfriedokra's talk page and
548:. Farmoneyy haven't participated yet.
225:
207:
178:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
5884:"The term "Indian subcontinent" is a
5249:reference) in the "Names" section. --
4722:The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "
4555:, page 421, Walter de Gruyter, 2000,
4410:, page 421, Walter de Gruyter, 2000,
4089:, page 421, Walter de Gruyter, 2000,
2803:, page 421, Walter de Gruyter, 2000,
2485:The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "
2326:, page 421, Walter de Gruyter, 2000,
2247:, page 421, Walter de Gruyter, 2000,
1454:political views. Further overlooking
935:The terms "Indian subcontinent" and "
570:. شاه عباس haven't participated yet.
443:shortly before the disputes started.
400:with a request to maintain status quo
7:
4883:Jim Norwine & Alfonso González,
4465:Discussion about a disputed sentence
4315:The following discussion is closed.
4146:Jim Norwine & Alfonso González,
3805:
3045:? A tad too wordy, but still safer.
2860:Jim Norwine & Alfonso González,
1939:Jim Norwine & Alfonso González,
1602:, like we did on earlier Consensuses
1394:as explained by RegentsPark and per
4668:RfC about another disputed sentence
4542:, page 237, Editions OPHRYS, 2011,
4397:, page 237, Editions OPHRYS, 2011,
4076:, page 237, Editions OPHRYS, 2011,
4029:
4007:
3985:
3336:to go to the Wiktionary, not here (
2790:, page 237, Editions OPHRYS, 2011,
2743:
2721:
2699:
2313:, page 237, Editions OPHRYS, 2011,
2234:, page 237, Editions OPHRYS, 2011,
2158:
2133:
2108:
1999:
1073:instead. And I hope you don't want
546:with an inviation to the discussion
487:with an inviation to the discussion
2494:Please, correct me if I am wrong.
1821:, page 7, Diane Publishing, 2011,
1808:", Health check, BBC World Service
1804:Lizzie Crouch and Paula McGrath, "
1240:, and already are making baseless
24:
5562:Indian subcontinent is not India!
5494:allowed according to Knowledge's
4909:Lucian W. Pye & Mary W. Pye,
4693:The result of this discussion is
4171:Lucian W. Pye & Mary W. Pye,
3804:on the Knowledge is not as easy.
2885:Lucian W. Pye & Mary W. Pye,
1964:Lucian W. Pye & Mary W. Pye,
1880:, page 365, Lancers Books, 1993,
575:asked for a look at the situation
441:reduced redudancy and removed two
428:Note 1: Came immediately after I
5273:
5158:Nevermind, I've figured it out.
4957:The discussion above is closed.
4934:Sugata Bose & Ayesha Jalal,
4564:Robin Coningham and Ruth Young,
4456:The discussion above is closed.
4419:Robin Coningham and Ruth Young,
4218:The discussion above is closed.
4195:Sugata Bose & Ayesha Jalal,
4098:Robin Coningham and Ruth Young,
3943:New Oxford Dictionary of English
3806:
3802:righting the wrongs of the world
2909:Sugata Bose & Ayesha Jalal,
2812:Robin Coningham and Ruth Young,
2657:New Oxford Dictionary of English
2335:Robin Coningham and Ruth Young,
2256:Robin Coningham and Ruth Young,
2063:New Oxford Dictionary of English
2019:Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby,
1988:Sugata Bose & Ayesha Jalal,
710:
568:with a request to the discussion
373:Note 1: It came shortly after I
29:
4520:Geopolitics of the World System
4375:Geopolitics of the World System
4054:Geopolitics of the World System
2768:Geopolitics of the World System
2291:Geopolitics of the World System
2212:Geopolitics of the World System
1112:cited in the article as a whole
430:tagged Rockgod01's further edit
357:some cited and sourced material
188:it doesn't (in edit summaries).
5336:18:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
5321:17:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
5178:Pakistan, India and Bangladesh
4592:A History of Islamic Societies
4253:please read the thread above.
2040:The Changing Geography of Asia
1702:14:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
1677:01:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1666:18:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
1600:Oppose Afghanistan’s inclusion
1593:00:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
1555:12:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
1544:17:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
1529:16:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
1480:16:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
1434:23:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1409:16:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1387:10:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1366:19:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1345:17:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1312:00:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
1291:03:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1272:01:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1255:01:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1212:00:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
1161:17:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1095:16:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1029:15:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
1005:15:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
987:14:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
956:11:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
859:01:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
819:19:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
796:17:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
782:11:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
765:11:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
751:05:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
732:08:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
683:04:35, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
665:21:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
643:19:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
584:19:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
532:removed as much Foxhound03 did
342:03:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
299:02:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
244:01:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
164:19:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
5950:21:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
5936:21:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
4840:13:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
4715:12:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
4551:Bob Parry and Chris Perkins,
4406:Bob Parry and Chris Perkins,
4287:RfC about a disputed sentence
4282:17:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
4266:06:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
4241:05:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
4085:Bob Parry and Chris Perkins,
3900:21:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
3861:12:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
3846:11:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
3225:Attested examples of usage:
2799:Bob Parry and Chris Perkins,
2322:Bob Parry and Chris Perkins,
2243:Bob Parry and Chris Perkins,
1473:what they don't have at all.
1195:one of your team members, and
216:) Not in discussion anymore.
148:21:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
5921:01:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
5902:01:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
5865:19:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
5850:23:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
5836:16:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
5821:16:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
5800:23:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
5434:Asian Football Confederation
5046:to include this information
4986:18:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
4938:, pages 3, Routledge, 2004,
4823:02:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
4809:23:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
4792:09:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
4775:05:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
4755:02:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
4735:01:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
4663:02:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
4488:14:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
4343:23:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
4308:01:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
4199:, pages 3, Routledge, 2004,
3818:01:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
3795:01:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
3778:00:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
3765:15:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
3733:01:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
3720:14:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
3692:01:12, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
3681:09:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
3666:01:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
3646:20:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
3627:18:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
3585:15:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
2991:This seems a good solution.
2913:, pages 3, Routledge, 2004,
2042:, page 10, Routledge, 2002,
1992:, pages 3, Routledge, 2004,
648:This is an invalid RfC, see
5596:12:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
5531:15:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
5521:I think we're done here. -
5498:guidelines. No matter how "
5464:05:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
5415:15:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
5379:14:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
5357:03:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
5297:, or consider visiting the
3569:05:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
3493:00:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
3474:21:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3454:20:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3440:11:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3427:18:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
3362:16:52, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
3347:18:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
3340:). I am fine with a merge.
3329:17:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
3308:18:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
3261:17:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
3179:20:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3165:17:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3146:10:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3132:09:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
3082:01:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
3066:17:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
3052:17:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
3001:16:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2983:16:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2614:01:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
2598:23:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2586:21:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2568:16:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2545:14:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
2531:18:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
2517:14:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
2501:05:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
2469:in the Indian subcontinent.
2023:, page 3, Routledge, 2006,
1771:17:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
1748:16:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
1722:14:44, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
1566:17:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
1077:as that would be seriously
1065:. I am sure you don't want
530:On 21 September, Farmoneyy
388:, cutting off some fat and
84:
5968:
5631:05:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
5611:01:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
5577:06:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
5557:07:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
5056:11:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
5026:10:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
5007:07:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
4272:is included in South Asia
3483:into Indian subcontinent.
3301:play by the rules, aye?).
5786:03:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
5751:03:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
5685:08:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
5654:02:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
5261:12:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
4728:" belong to the article?
4620:page 1, Routledge, 2013,
4540:The Geopolitics of Energy
4481:" belong to the article?
4395:The Geopolitics of Energy
4336:" belong to the article?
4074:The Geopolitics of Energy
2788:The Geopolitics of Energy
2395:Solution 1 (now rejected)
2311:The Geopolitics of Energy
2232:The Geopolitics of Energy
1888:Daya Nath Tripathi (ed),
1422:TEAM is fulfilling their
812:, so I could be wrong. --
497:In two hours, Foxhound03
228:" belong to the article?
5729:17:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
5714:17:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
5700:13:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
5617:Bhutan is not a republic
5347:the Indian subcontinent.
5237:South Asian Subcontinent
5232:06:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
5215:03:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
5201:03:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
4959:Please do not modify it.
4911:Asian Power and Politics
4682:Please do not modify it.
4603:Radhey Shyam Chaurasia,
4458:Please do not modify it.
4317:Please do not modify it.
4220:Please do not modify it.
4173:Asian Power and Politics
2887:Asian Power and Politics
1966:Asian Power and Politics
1447:South Asian subcontinent
449:. Gone into discussion.
406:. Gone into discussion.
386:merged the two sentences
99:Please do not modify it.
18:Talk:Indian subcontinent
5771:16:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
5168:20:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
5144:20:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
5122:19:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
5106:18:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
5090:17:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
4697:the sentence as it is.
3955:Oxford University Press
3940:"Indian subcontinent".
2669:Oxford University Press
2654:"Indian subcontinent".
2075:Oxford University Press
2060:"Indian subcontinent".
1205:even remotely. Thanks.
1105:"neutral point of view"
499:removed that part again
375:tagged Rockgod01's edit
115:on this narrow point.
4605:History of Middle East
4538:Jean-Pierre Favennec,
4393:Jean-Pierre Favennec,
4072:Jean-Pierre Favennec,
3234:
3169:I have no objections.
2786:Jean-Pierre Favennec,
2309:Jean-Pierre Favennec,
2230:Jean-Pierre Favennec,
2185:Jona Razzaque (2004).
1638:And this can go on……….
1584:and rarely Afghanistan
1131:edit warring incidents
941:
926:
613:do it the right way.
476:
422:
367:
5642:United Nations System
4992:Tiny edit recommended
3865:Indeed. It was there
3399:In last eight weeks,
3218:
1900:Muhammad Akram Khan,
1492:righting great wrongs
1451:Indo Pak subcontinent
1050:rising to uphold the
412:along with a bit more
277:continue edit warring
261:Behavioural questions
42:of past discussions.
5288:ask another question
5012:Myanmar is also part
4922:Mark Juergensmeyer,
4871:The history of India
4518:Saul Bernard Cohen,
4373:Saul Bernard Cohen,
4183:Mark Juergensmeyer,
4134:The history of India
4052:Saul Bernard Cohen,
4033:The named reference
4011:The named reference
3989:The named reference
2897:Mark Juergensmeyer,
2848:The history of India
2766:Saul Bernard Cohen,
2747:The named reference
2725:The named reference
2703:The named reference
2289:Saul Bernard Cohen,
2210:Saul Bernard Cohen,
2162:The named reference
2137:The named reference
2112:The named reference
1976:Mark Juergensmeyer,
1927:The history of India
1199:of your team members
447:Reverted by Kmzayeem
4720:Does the sentence "
4677:request for comment
4553:World Mapping Today
4469:Does the sentence "
4408:World Mapping Today
4324:Does the sentence "
4087:World Mapping Today
3383:Another possibility
3201:Another observation
2801:World Mapping Today
2324:World Mapping Today
2245:World Mapping Today
1817:K. Alan Kronstadt,
1496:Indian subcontinent
522:I love that epithet
94:request for comment
5436:as a member state.
4782:- Well sourced. -
4318:
4274:Pappu pistawl wala
3879:repeated inclusion
1836:Aijazuddin Ahmad,
1443:Asian subcontinent
1044:WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND
607:were already there
564:Reverted again by
552:13 minutes later,
455:removed a bit more
390:removed the repeat
181:" into that list?
5763:Pranav Maheshwari
5456:James Ker-Lindsay
5371:James Ker-Lindsay
5305:
5304:
5290:on your talk page
5259:
5120:
5088:
4988:
4976:comment added by
4955:
4954:
4936:Modern South Asia
4753:
4704:
4701:non-admin closure
4638:
4637:
4577:Stephen Goddard,
4454:
4453:
4432:Stephen Goddard,
4316:
4216:
4215:
4197:Modern South Asia
4111:Stephen Goddard,
3793:
3722:
3706:comment added by
3612:I would stick to
3506:
3505:
3472:
3409:Fowler&fowler
3379:
3378:
3320:Fowler&fowler
3283:The inclusion of
3271:
3252:Fowler&fowler
3224:
3080:
2981:
2930:
2929:
2911:Modern South Asia
2825:Stephen Goddard,
2612:
2573:User:Aditya Kabir
2392:
2391:
2348:Stephen Goddard,
2269:Stephen Goddard,
2197:978-90-411-2214-8
1990:Modern South Asia
1720:
1343:
872:
871:
852:Added questions.
523:
198:actually removing
135:
132:non-admin closure
82:
81:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5959:
5942:Infernomoonsault
5928:Infernomoonsault
5918:
5912:
5828:Fylindfotberserk
5452:official website
5399:reliable sources
5292:
5277:
5270:
5253:
5247:
5205:@historyofiran
5114:
5082:
5072:
5037:
4945:
4866:
4845:
4820:
4784:Fylindfotberserk
4772:
4766:
4747:
4732:
4707:Soumya-8974 (he)
4698:
4684:
4628:
4590:Ira M. Lapidus,
4536:
4530:
4516:
4495:
4485:
4444:
4391:
4385:
4371:
4350:
4340:
4263:
4257:
4252:
4206:
4129:
4123:
4070:
4064:
4050:
4044:
4043:
4042:
4036:
4028:
4022:
4021:
4020:
4014:
4006:
4000:
3999:
3998:
3992:
3984:
3978:
3938:
3917:
3897:
3843:
3815:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3787:
3775:
3730:
3689:
3663:
3624:
3566:
3466:
3424:
3392:Extended content
3388:
3357:
3344:
3338:WP:NOTDICTIONARY
3326:
3321:
3305:
3269:
3258:
3253:
3221:
3210:Extended content
3206:
3160:
3129:
3124:
3074:
3049:
2975:
2920:
2843:
2837:
2784:
2778:
2764:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2750:
2742:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2728:
2720:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2706:
2698:
2692:
2652:
2631:
2606:
2595:
2565:
2555:
2498:
2382:
2377:
2371:
2366:
2360:
2307:
2301:
2287:
2281:
2228:
2222:
2208:
2202:
2201:
2182:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2165:
2157:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2140:
2132:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2115:
2107:
2098:
2058:
2049:
2036:
2030:
2017:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
1922:
1911:
1874:
1868:
1855:
1849:
1834:
1828:
1815:
1809:
1802:
1781:
1768:
1712:
1674:
1656:
1649:
1607:WP:CHERRYPICKING
1590:
1563:
1541:
1439:Qualified oppose
1431:
1424:declared promise
1404:
1337:
1309:
1269:
1209:
1092:
953:
856:
841:
816:
806:
793:
762:
748:
723:
718:
714:
713:
707:
701:
680:
675:
656:
640:
581:
521:
515:Reported to ANB.
477:
423:
368:
339:
296:
253:Extended content
249:
241:
161:
139:
129:
128:is recommended.
101:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
5967:
5966:
5962:
5961:
5960:
5958:
5957:
5956:
5916:
5910:
5875:
5808:
5759:
5662:
5619:
5584:
5564:
5545:
5349:207.255.243.110
5344:
5268:
5241:
5239:
5180:
5066:
5064:
5031:
5014:
4994:
4968:
4963:
4962:
4951:
4950:
4949:
4948:
4896:Raj S. Bhopal,
4867:
4863:
4850:
4818:
4770:
4765:Joshua Jonathan
4764:
4730:
4717:
4713:
4680:
4670:
4643:
4634:
4633:
4632:
4631:
4537:
4533:
4517:
4513:
4500:
4483:
4467:
4462:
4461:
4450:
4449:
4448:
4447:
4392:
4388:
4372:
4368:
4355:
4338:
4321:
4312:
4311:
4310:
4294:
4289:
4261:
4256:Joshua Jonathan
4255:
4246:
4229:
4224:
4223:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4209:
4158:Raj S. Bhopal,
4130:
4126:
4071:
4067:
4051:
4047:
4034:
4032:
4030:
4025:
4012:
4010:
4008:
4003:
3990:
3988:
3986:
3981:
3939:
3935:
3922:
3895:
3887:WP:STONEWALLING
3881:of Afghanistan
3841:
3813:
3807:
3773:
3728:
3687:
3661:
3622:
3595:WP:WRONGVERSION
3564:
3512:
3507:
3436:Aman Kumar Goel
3422:
3393:
3385:
3380:
3342:
3324:
3319:
3303:
3256:
3251:
3211:
3203:
3127:
3101:Aman.kumar.goel
3086:
3047:
2935:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2872:Raj S. Bhopal,
2844:
2840:
2785:
2781:
2765:
2761:
2748:
2746:
2744:
2739:
2726:
2724:
2722:
2717:
2704:
2702:
2700:
2695:
2653:
2649:
2636:
2593:
2563:
2549:
2496:
2447:(I propose the
2397:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2378:
2374:
2367:
2363:
2308:
2304:
2288:
2284:
2229:
2225:
2209:
2205:
2198:
2184:
2183:
2176:
2163:
2161:
2159:
2151:
2138:
2136:
2134:
2126:
2113:
2111:
2109:
2101:
2059:
2052:
2037:
2033:
2018:
2014:
2002:
2000:
1951:Raj S. Bhopal,
1923:
1914:
1875:
1871:
1856:
1852:
1835:
1831:
1816:
1812:
1803:
1799:
1786:
1766:
1736:Plate tectonics
1672:
1650:
1643:
1588:
1561:
1551:Aman Kumar Goel
1539:
1525:Aman Kumar Goel
1476:Aman Kumar Goel
1429:
1307:
1267:
1207:
1139:in this article
1090:
1040:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY
1014:with including
1012:firmly disagree
951:
878:
873:
854:
835:
814:
800:
791:
760:
746:
721:
711:
709:
703:
697:
692:way from being
678:
669:
654:
638:
591:
579:
460:
417:
362:
349:
337:
294:
263:
254:
239:
171:
159:
150:
137:
97:
87:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5965:
5963:
5955:
5954:
5953:
5952:
5923:
5874:
5871:
5870:
5869:
5868:
5867:
5838:
5807:
5804:
5803:
5802:
5788:
5758:
5755:
5754:
5753:
5739:
5735:
5734:
5733:
5732:
5731:
5661:
5658:
5657:
5656:
5618:
5615:
5614:
5613:
5603:120.16.231.111
5583:
5580:
5569:120.16.115.111
5563:
5560:
5544:
5541:
5540:
5539:
5538:
5537:
5536:
5535:
5534:
5533:
5519:
5511:
5510:
5509:
5500:right or wrong
5488:
5487:
5486:
5471:
5470:
5469:
5468:
5467:
5466:
5442:
5441:
5440:
5439:
5438:
5437:
5420:
5419:
5418:
5417:
5395:
5394:
5393:
5382:
5381:
5365:
5364:
5343:
5340:
5339:
5338:
5303:
5302:
5295:user talk page
5278:
5267:
5264:
5238:
5235:
5179:
5176:
5175:
5174:
5173:
5172:
5171:
5170:
5151:
5150:
5149:
5148:
5147:
5146:
5127:
5126:
5125:
5124:
5063:
5060:
5059:
5058:
5013:
5010:
4993:
4990:
4967:
4964:
4956:
4953:
4952:
4947:
4946:
4933:
4921:
4908:
4895:
4882:
4860:
4859:
4856:
4855:
4852:
4851:
4848:
4843:
4842:
4825:
4811:
4794:
4777:
4757:
4718:
4709:
4692:
4691:
4690:
4671:
4669:
4666:
4655:207.161.86.162
4647:your reversion
4642:
4639:
4636:
4635:
4630:
4629:
4615:
4602:
4589:
4576:
4563:
4550:
4531:
4510:
4509:
4506:
4505:
4502:
4501:
4498:
4492:
4479:in the region.
4466:
4463:
4455:
4452:
4451:
4446:
4445:
4431:
4418:
4405:
4386:
4365:
4364:
4361:
4360:
4357:
4356:
4353:
4347:
4322:
4313:
4296:
4295:
4292:
4291:
4290:
4288:
4285:
4269:
4268:
4228:
4225:
4217:
4214:
4213:
4208:
4207:
4194:
4182:
4170:
4157:
4145:
4124:
4110:
4097:
4084:
4065:
4045:
4023:
4001:
3979:
3932:
3931:
3928:
3927:
3924:
3923:
3920:
3915:
3914:
3913:
3912:
3911:
3910:
3909:
3908:
3907:
3906:
3905:
3904:
3903:
3902:
3837:WP:NOCONSENSUS
3832:
3750:
3749:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3737:
3736:
3735:
3656:
3618:
3610:
3602:
3591:WP:NOCONSENSUS
3511:
3508:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3499:
3498:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3395:
3394:
3391:
3386:
3384:
3381:
3377:
3376:
3375:
3374:
3373:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3366:
3365:
3364:
3298:
3297:
3296:
3292:
3281:
3277:
3232:subcontinent."
3213:
3212:
3209:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3195:
3194:
3193:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3181:
2986:
2985:
2934:
2931:
2928:
2927:
2922:
2921:
2908:
2896:
2884:
2871:
2859:
2838:
2824:
2811:
2798:
2779:
2759:
2737:
2715:
2693:
2646:
2645:
2642:
2641:
2638:
2637:
2634:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2492:
2491:
2481:
2480:
2472:
2471:
2457:
2456:
2440:
2439:
2405:
2404:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2389:
2384:
2383:
2372:
2361:
2347:
2334:
2321:
2302:
2282:
2268:
2255:
2242:
2223:
2203:
2196:
2174:
2149:
2124:
2099:
2050:
2031:
2012:
1987:
1975:
1963:
1950:
1938:
1912:
1899:
1887:
1869:
1857:Ayesha Jalal,
1850:
1829:
1810:
1796:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1787:
1784:
1778:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1751:
1750:
1724:
1704:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1596:
1595:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1532:
1531:
1483:
1482:
1469:
1468:
1436:
1411:
1389:
1368:
1347:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1226:
1191:
1183:
1176:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1124:
1116:
1086:
1055:
1032:
1031:
1009:
1008:
1007:
882:WP:NOCONSENSUS
877:
874:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
847:
844:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
590:
587:
558:
557:
536:
535:
528:
525:
503:
502:
459:
458:
416:
415:
382:repeated twice
377:for citation.
361:
360:
348:
345:
282:
281:
280:
279:
273:
270:
262:
259:
256:
255:
252:
247:
235:
234:
233:
232:
222:
221:
220:
203:
202:
201:
191:
190:
189:
170:
167:
151:
117:WP:NOCONSENSUS
109:
108:
107:
88:
86:
83:
80:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5964:
5951:
5947:
5943:
5939:
5938:
5937:
5933:
5929:
5924:
5922:
5919:
5913:
5906:
5905:
5904:
5903:
5899:
5895:
5894:120.16.38.160
5890:
5887:
5882:
5880:
5866:
5862:
5858:
5857:207.96.13.213
5853:
5852:
5851:
5847:
5843:
5839:
5837:
5833:
5829:
5825:
5824:
5823:
5822:
5818:
5814:
5805:
5801:
5797:
5793:
5789:
5787:
5783:
5779:
5775:
5774:
5773:
5772:
5768:
5764:
5756:
5752:
5748:
5744:
5740:
5736:
5730:
5726:
5722:
5717:
5716:
5715:
5711:
5707:
5703:
5702:
5701:
5697:
5693:
5689:
5688:
5687:
5686:
5682:
5678:
5673:
5670:
5669:
5665:
5659:
5655:
5651:
5647:
5643:
5639:
5635:
5634:
5633:
5632:
5628:
5624:
5616:
5612:
5608:
5604:
5600:
5599:
5598:
5597:
5593:
5589:
5581:
5579:
5578:
5574:
5570:
5561:
5559:
5558:
5554:
5550:
5542:
5532:
5528:
5524:
5520:
5517:
5512:
5508:
5504:
5503:
5501:
5497:
5493:
5489:
5485:
5481:
5480:
5479:
5478:
5477:
5476:
5475:
5474:
5473:
5472:
5465:
5461:
5457:
5453:
5448:
5447:
5446:
5445:
5444:
5443:
5435:
5430:
5426:
5425:
5424:
5423:
5422:
5421:
5416:
5412:
5408:
5404:
5400:
5396:
5392:
5388:
5387:
5386:
5385:
5384:
5383:
5380:
5376:
5372:
5367:
5366:
5361:
5360:
5359:
5358:
5354:
5350:
5341:
5337:
5333:
5329:
5325:
5324:
5323:
5322:
5318:
5314:
5310:
5300:
5296:
5291:
5289:
5283:
5279:
5276:
5272:
5271:
5265:
5263:
5262:
5257:
5252:
5245:
5236:
5234:
5233:
5229:
5225:
5222:
5221:HistoryofIran
5217:
5216:
5212:
5208:
5203:
5202:
5198:
5194:
5188:
5184:
5177:
5169:
5165:
5161:
5157:
5156:
5155:
5154:
5153:
5152:
5145:
5141:
5137:
5133:
5132:
5131:
5130:
5129:
5128:
5123:
5118:
5113:
5109:
5108:
5107:
5103:
5099:
5094:
5093:
5092:
5091:
5086:
5081:
5077:
5070:
5061:
5057:
5053:
5049:
5045:
5041:
5035:
5030:
5029:
5028:
5027:
5023:
5019:
5011:
5009:
5008:
5004:
5000:
4991:
4989:
4987:
4983:
4979:
4978:24.126.12.145
4975:
4966:The Himalayas
4965:
4960:
4944:
4943:0-415-30787-2
4941:
4937:
4932:
4931:0-19-513798-1
4929:
4925:
4919:
4918:0-674-04979-9
4916:
4912:
4906:
4905:0-19-856817-7
4903:
4899:
4893:
4892:0-04-910121-8
4890:
4886:
4880:
4879:0-313-31459-4
4877:
4873:
4872:
4868:John McLeod,
4865:
4862:
4858:
4854:
4853:
4847:
4846:
4841:
4837:
4833:
4829:
4826:
4824:
4821:
4815:
4812:
4810:
4806:
4802:
4798:
4795:
4793:
4789:
4785:
4781:
4778:
4776:
4773:
4767:
4761:
4758:
4756:
4751:
4746:
4742:
4741:Yeah, it does
4739:
4738:
4737:
4736:
4733:
4727:
4725:
4716:
4712:
4708:
4702:
4696:
4689:
4686:
4683:
4678:
4673:
4672:
4667:
4665:
4664:
4660:
4656:
4652:
4648:
4640:
4626:
4625:9781136626685
4623:
4619:
4613:
4612:9788126904488
4610:
4606:
4600:
4599:9780521514309
4597:
4593:
4587:
4586:9780389204039
4584:
4580:
4574:
4573:9781316418987
4571:
4567:
4561:
4560:9783110959444
4558:
4554:
4548:
4547:9782710811459
4545:
4541:
4535:
4532:
4528:
4527:9780847699070
4525:
4521:
4515:
4512:
4508:
4504:
4503:
4497:
4496:
4493:
4490:
4489:
4486:
4480:
4478:
4474:
4464:
4459:
4442:
4441:9780389204039
4439:
4435:
4429:
4428:9781316418987
4426:
4422:
4416:
4415:9783110959444
4413:
4409:
4403:
4402:9782710811459
4400:
4396:
4390:
4387:
4383:
4382:9780847699070
4380:
4376:
4370:
4367:
4363:
4359:
4358:
4352:
4351:
4348:
4345:
4344:
4341:
4335:
4333:
4329:
4320:
4309:
4305:
4301:
4286:
4284:
4283:
4279:
4275:
4267:
4264:
4258:
4250:
4249:ShikaDikaMika
4245:
4244:
4243:
4242:
4238:
4234:
4233:ShikaDikaMika
4226:
4221:
4205:
4204:0-415-30787-2
4202:
4198:
4193:
4192:0-19-513798-1
4190:
4186:
4181:
4180:0-674-04979-9
4178:
4174:
4168:
4167:0-19-856817-7
4165:
4161:
4156:
4155:0-04-910121-8
4153:
4149:
4143:
4142:0-313-31459-4
4140:
4136:
4135:
4131:John McLeod,
4128:
4125:
4121:
4120:9780389204039
4118:
4114:
4108:
4107:9781316418987
4105:
4101:
4095:
4094:9783110959444
4092:
4088:
4082:
4081:9782710811459
4079:
4075:
4069:
4066:
4062:
4061:9780847699070
4059:
4055:
4049:
4046:
4040:
4027:
4024:
4018:
4005:
4002:
3996:
3983:
3980:
3976:
3972:
3968:
3964:
3963:Bay of Bengal
3960:
3956:
3952:
3951:0-19-860441-6
3949:
3945:
3944:
3937:
3934:
3930:
3926:
3925:
3919:
3918:
3901:
3898:
3892:
3891:WP:POVPUSHING
3888:
3884:
3880:
3876:
3872:
3868:
3864:
3863:
3862:
3858:
3854:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3844:
3838:
3833:
3830:
3827:
3824:
3821:
3820:
3819:
3816:
3803:
3798:
3797:
3796:
3791:
3786:
3781:
3780:
3779:
3776:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3766:
3762:
3758:
3753:
3734:
3731:
3724:
3723:
3721:
3717:
3713:
3709:
3705:
3698:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3690:
3684:
3683:
3682:
3678:
3674:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3664:
3657:
3654:
3649:
3648:
3647:
3643:
3639:
3634:
3633:User:شاه عباس
3630:
3629:
3628:
3625:
3619:
3615:
3611:
3608:
3603:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3588:
3587:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3573:
3572:
3571:
3570:
3567:
3560:
3559:
3557:
3553:
3549:
3545:
3542:, as well as
3541:
3537:
3533:
3529:
3525:
3521:
3515:
3509:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3482:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3470:
3465:
3461:
3458:We also have
3457:
3456:
3455:
3451:
3447:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3438:
3437:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3428:
3425:
3418:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3397:
3396:
3389:
3382:
3363:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3350:
3349:
3348:
3345:
3339:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3330:
3327:
3322:
3316:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3306:
3299:
3293:
3290:
3289:Greater India
3286:
3285:WP:OTHERNAMES
3282:
3278:
3274:
3273:
3270:Edit conflict
3267:
3266:
3265:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3259:
3254:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3233:
3229:
3226:
3223:geopolitical.
3215:
3214:
3207:
3200:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3168:
3167:
3166:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3153:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3130:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3109:Santoshsatvik
3106:
3102:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3063:
3059:
3055:
3054:
3053:
3050:
3044:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3031:, as well as
3030:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3010:
3004:
3003:
3002:
2998:
2994:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2984:
2979:
2974:
2969:
2967:
2963:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2937:
2936:
2932:
2919:
2918:0-415-30787-2
2916:
2912:
2907:
2906:0-19-513798-1
2904:
2900:
2895:
2894:0-674-04979-9
2892:
2888:
2882:
2881:0-19-856817-7
2879:
2875:
2870:
2869:0-04-910121-8
2867:
2863:
2857:
2856:0-313-31459-4
2854:
2850:
2849:
2845:John McLeod,
2842:
2839:
2835:
2834:9780389204039
2832:
2828:
2822:
2821:9781316418987
2819:
2815:
2809:
2808:9783110959444
2806:
2802:
2796:
2795:9782710811459
2793:
2789:
2783:
2780:
2776:
2775:9780847699070
2773:
2769:
2763:
2760:
2754:
2741:
2738:
2732:
2719:
2716:
2710:
2697:
2694:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2677:Bay of Bengal
2674:
2670:
2666:
2665:0-19-860441-6
2663:
2659:
2658:
2651:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2639:
2633:
2632:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2596:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2574:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2566:
2560:
2553:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2499:
2490:
2488:
2483:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2464:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2441:
2438:
2436:
2433:, as well as
2432:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2407:
2406:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2394:
2381:
2376:
2373:
2370:
2365:
2362:
2358:
2357:9780389204039
2355:
2351:
2345:
2344:9781316418987
2342:
2338:
2332:
2331:9783110959444
2329:
2325:
2319:
2318:9782710811459
2316:
2312:
2306:
2303:
2299:
2298:9780847699070
2296:
2292:
2286:
2283:
2279:
2278:9780389204039
2276:
2272:
2266:
2265:9781316418987
2263:
2259:
2253:
2252:9783110959444
2250:
2246:
2240:
2239:9782710811459
2237:
2233:
2227:
2224:
2220:
2219:9780847699070
2217:
2213:
2207:
2204:
2199:
2194:
2190:
2189:
2181:
2179:
2175:
2169:
2156:
2154:
2150:
2144:
2131:
2129:
2125:
2119:
2106:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2083:Bay of Bengal
2080:
2076:
2072:
2071:0-19-860441-6
2069:
2065:
2064:
2057:
2055:
2051:
2048:
2047:9781134933846
2045:
2041:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2028:9781134593224
2026:
2022:
2016:
2013:
2006:
1998:
1997:0-415-30787-2
1995:
1991:
1986:
1985:0-19-513798-1
1983:
1979:
1974:
1973:0-674-04979-9
1971:
1967:
1961:
1960:0-19-856817-7
1958:
1954:
1949:
1948:0-04-910121-8
1946:
1942:
1936:
1935:0-313-31459-4
1933:
1929:
1928:
1924:John McLeod,
1921:
1919:
1917:
1913:
1910:
1909:9781782544159
1907:
1903:
1898:
1897:9788178271200
1895:
1891:
1886:
1885:9788170950363
1883:
1879:
1876:K. D. Kapur,
1873:
1870:
1867:
1866:9780674039070
1864:
1860:
1854:
1851:
1848:
1847:9788180695681
1845:
1841:
1840:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1826:9781437929539
1824:
1820:
1814:
1811:
1807:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1783:
1782:
1779:
1772:
1769:
1762:
1758:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1705:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1678:
1675:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1654:
1647:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1612:
1611:
1608:
1604:
1601:
1598:
1597:
1594:
1591:
1585:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1567:
1564:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1552:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1542:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1527:
1526:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1486:Furthermore,
1485:
1484:
1481:
1478:
1477:
1471:
1470:
1467:
1461:
1460:Greater India
1457:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1427:
1425:
1421:
1420:self-declared
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1397:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1323:
1322:
1313:
1310:
1304:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1270:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1224:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1210:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1189:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1013:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
993:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:Greater India
968:
964:
960:
959:
958:
957:
954:
947:
946:
945:WP:OTHERNAMES
940:
938:
932:
931:
925:
923:
919:
916:, and rarely
915:
912:, as well as
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
885:
883:
876:No discussion
875:
860:
857:
851:
848:
845:
839:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
820:
817:
811:
804:
799:
798:
797:
794:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
763:
757:
753:
752:
749:
743:
733:
729:
725:
717:
706:
700:
695:
691:
686:
685:
684:
681:
673:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
641:
634:
632:
628:
627:SpacemanSpiff
624:
620:
614:
610:
608:
604:
599:
595:
588:
586:
585:
582:
576:
571:
569:
567:
561:
555:
551:
550:
549:
547:
545:
539:
533:
529:
526:
519:
518:
517:
516:
512:
507:
500:
496:
495:
494:
492:
488:
486:
480:
475:
473:
469:
466:, and rarely
465:
456:
452:
451:
450:
448:
444:
442:
438:
433:
431:
426:
421:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
401:
399:
393:
391:
387:
383:
378:
376:
371:
366:
358:
354:
353:
352:
346:
344:
343:
340:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
300:
297:
291:
290:self declared
287:
278:
274:
271:
268:
267:
265:
264:
260:
258:
257:
250:
246:
245:
242:
237:Any comment?
230:
229:
227:
223:
218:
217:
215:
211:
209:
204:
199:
195:
194:
192:
187:
183:
182:
180:
176:
175:
174:
168:
166:
165:
162:
156:
149:
146:
143:
140:
133:
127:
123:
118:
114:
106:
103:
100:
95:
90:
89:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5940:capitalise*
5891:
5883:
5876:
5813:39.41.201.56
5809:
5760:
5674:
5671:
5666:
5663:
5638:puppet state
5620:
5585:
5565:
5546:
5506:
5491:
5483:
5390:
5345:
5342:Disagreement
5328:Salimfadhley
5306:
5287:
5282:help request
5240:
5218:
5204:
5189:
5185:
5181:
5065:
5062:Geopolitical
5048:Robynthehode
5044:WP:CONSENSUS
5015:
4995:
4972:— Preceding
4969:
4958:
4935:
4923:
4910:
4897:
4884:
4869:
4864:
4857:
4827:
4813:
4796:
4779:
4759:
4740:
4719:
4694:
4687:
4681:
4674:
4644:
4617:
4604:
4591:
4578:
4565:
4552:
4539:
4534:
4519:
4514:
4507:
4491:
4468:
4457:
4433:
4420:
4407:
4394:
4389:
4374:
4369:
4362:
4346:
4323:
4314:
4270:
4230:
4219:
4196:
4184:
4172:
4159:
4147:
4132:
4127:
4112:
4099:
4086:
4073:
4068:
4053:
4048:
4031:Cite error:
4026:
4009:Cite error:
4004:
3987:Cite error:
3982:
3953:) New York:
3941:
3936:
3929:
3882:
3874:
3751:
3702:— Preceding
3696:
3653:WP:STONEWALL
3607:WP:STONEWALL
3561:
3516:
3513:
3481:Indian Plate
3460:Indian plate
3446:WhatamIdoing
3434:
3398:
3353:
3352:
3315:Indian plate
3235:
3230:
3227:
3219:
3171:WhatamIdoing
3156:
3155:
3121:WhatamIdoing
3006:
2939:
2910:
2898:
2886:
2873:
2861:
2846:
2841:
2826:
2813:
2800:
2787:
2782:
2767:
2762:
2745:Cite error:
2740:
2723:Cite error:
2718:
2701:Cite error:
2696:
2667:) New York:
2655:
2650:
2643:
2493:
2453:WhatamIdoing
2448:
2398:
2375:
2364:
2349:
2336:
2323:
2310:
2305:
2290:
2285:
2270:
2257:
2244:
2231:
2226:
2211:
2206:
2187:
2160:Cite error:
2135:Cite error:
2110:Cite error:
2073:) New York:
2061:
2039:
2034:
2020:
2015:
2001:Cite error:
1989:
1977:
1965:
1952:
1940:
1925:
1901:
1889:
1877:
1872:
1858:
1853:
1837:
1832:
1818:
1813:
1800:
1793:
1777:
1761:WhatamIdoing
1740:WhatamIdoing
1730:
1726:
1708:
1685:
1605:. Aditya is
1599:
1583:
1579:Include both
1578:
1549:
1523:
1487:
1474:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1417:
1413:
1400:
1399:
1392:Include both
1391:
1371:Include both
1370:
1350:Include both
1349:
1328:
1325:Include both
1324:
1277:
1241:
1233:
1229:
1222:
1217:
1203:WP:CONSENSUS
1198:
1194:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1111:
1104:
1082:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1011:
962:
948:
942:
934:
927:
887:
879:
849:
803:Aditya Kabir
769:
768:
755:
754:
741:
740:
719:for that. --
715:
689:
635:
615:
611:
600:
596:
592:
572:
565:
562:
559:
556:by شاه عباس.
543:
542:Reverted by
540:
537:
508:
504:
484:
483:Reverted by
481:
478:
462:
445:
436:
434:
427:
424:
419:
397:
396:Reverted by
394:
381:
379:
372:
369:
364:
350:
302:
283:
236:
213:
205:
197:
185:
172:
152:
113:no consensus
112:
104:
98:
91:
75:
43:
37:
5911:Orange Mike
5886:proper noun
5640:within the
5623:190.99.68.2
5523:LouisAragon
5407:LouisAragon
5251:RegentsPark
5112:RegentsPark
5080:RegentsPark
4771:Let's talk!
4745:RegentsPark
4651:RegentsPark
4473:Afghanistan
4328:Afghanistan
4262:Let's talk!
3959:Arabian Sea
3785:RegentsPark
3548:Afghanistan
3464:RegentsPark
3413:RegentsPark
3072:RegentsPark
3037:Afghanistan
2973:RegentsPark
2673:Arabian Sea
2604:RegentsPark
2463:Afghanistan
2449:Geopolitics
2079:Arabian Sea
1646:RegentsPark
1375:RegentsPark
1354:RegentsPark
1335:RegentsPark
1083:unequivocal
1079:WP:ORIGINAL
1016:Afghanistan
918:Afghanistan
705:this effect
699:these edits
631:Vanamonde93
623:RegentsPark
511:was invited
509:Foxhound03
468:Afghanistan
437:three times
155:last revert
122:WP:RFCBRIEF
36:This is an
5549:Nitesh1908
5313:Baamiyaan2
5309:South Asia
5224:Genius2622
5207:Genius2622
5193:Genius2622
5160:Foxhound03
5136:Foxhound03
5098:Foxhound03
5069:Foxhound03
4801:Rondolinda
4724:South Asia
3967:Bangladesh
3823:Foxhound03
3757:Foxhound03
3708:Arachosite
3599:WP:CLOSURE
3556:South Asia
3520:Bangladesh
3510:Consensus?
3295:reasoning.
3152:South Asia
3113:S Marshall
3009:Bangladesh
3005:How about
2942:Bangladesh
2933:Solution 2
2681:Bangladesh
2487:South Asia
2411:Bangladesh
2087:Bangladesh
1709:S Marshall
1500:Bangladesh
1456:WP:CONTEXT
937:South Asia
930:WP:BALANCE
890:Bangladesh
5757:Wrong Map
5034:Vhhhhjhgy
5018:Vhhhhjhgy
4832:Idealigic
4300:Barkeep49
4039:help page
4017:help page
4013:pirbhai14
3995:help page
3991:dkumar889
3853:Xerxes931
3673:DanHobley
3638:Xerxes931
3577:Xerxes931
3540:Sri Lanka
3485:Xerxes931
3420:article.
3405:Xerxes931
3243:Sinhalese
3138:Kautilya3
3117:DanHobley
3093:Kautilya3
3029:Sri Lanka
2962:Sri Lanka
2753:help page
2731:help page
2727:pirbhai14
2709:help page
2705:dkumar889
2578:Xerxes931
2552:Xerxes931
2537:Xerxes931
2509:Xerxes931
2477:DanHobley
2445:Xerxes931
2431:Sri Lanka
2168:help page
2143:help page
2139:pirbhai14
2118:help page
2114:dkumar889
2005:help page
1757:DanHobley
1694:Santosh L
1658:Xerxes931
1520:Sri Lanka
1396:MOS:INTRO
1379:DanHobley
1358:Kautilya3
1263:WP:KETTLE
1173:WP:ATTACK
1127:Obsessive
1067:generally
910:Sri Lanka
774:Xerxes931
716:Thank you
702:have had
672:Redrose64
491:elsewhere
288:is quite
169:Questions
145:(contrib)
138:Eggishorn
76:Archive 4
70:Archive 3
65:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
5877:I asked
5706:Seth9719
5677:Seth9719
5543:Mistakes
5299:Teahouse
5244:Ytpks896
4974:unsigned
4711:contribs
3975:Pakistan
3961:and the
3871:2018 too
3716:contribs
3704:unsigned
3544:Maldives
3536:Pakistan
3417:Kmzayeem
3105:Kmzayeem
3089:شاه عباس
3058:Khestwol
3033:Maldives
3025:Pakistan
2993:Khestwol
2966:Maldives
2958:Pakistan
2689:Pakistan
2675:and the
2523:Khestwol
2435:Maldives
2427:Pakistan
2095:Pakistan
2081:and the
1690:WP:UNDUE
1516:Pakistan
1283:شاه عباس
1247:شاه عباس
1238:Hounding
1230:have not
1218:does not
1169:WP:CIVIL
1153:شاه عباس
1143:Hounding
1135:stalking
1052:WP:TRUTH
1021:شاه عباس
997:شاه عباس
992:Khestwol
979:Khestwol
975:Gandhara
949:Thanks.
914:Maldives
906:Pakistan
843:further.
810:WP:SYNTH
756:Update 2
650:WP:RFCST
589:Comments
554:reverted
464:Maldives
214:Redacted
5879:ChatGPT
5721:MrOllie
5692:MrOllie
5256:comment
5117:comment
5085:comment
4849:Sources
4819:Danre98
4750:comment
4641:Italics
4499:Sources
4477:Myanmar
4354:Sources
4332:Myanmar
3921:Sources
3875:I wrote
3867:in 2019
3790:comment
3552:Myanmar
3469:comment
3401:Danre98
3247:Dhivehi
3119:, and
3097:Danre98
3077:comment
3041:Myanmar
2978:comment
2964:, and
2635:Sources
2609:comment
2559:sandbox
2467:Myanmar
1785:Sources
1653:Danre98
1589:Danre98
1340:comment
1330:region.
1308:Danre98
1188:WP:TEAM
1180:WP:LEAD
1101:WP:LEAD
1048:WP:TEAM
943:...per
928:...per
922:Myanmar
838:Danre98
815:Danre98
472:Myanmar
286:WP:TEAM
126:WP:WRFC
39:archive
5516:WP:DUE
5076:WP:BRD
4731:Aditya
4484:Aditya
4339:Aditya
4293:CLOSED
3896:Aditya
3883:before
3842:Aditya
3814:Aditya
3774:Aditya
3729:Aditya
3688:Aditya
3662:Aditya
3623:Aditya
3614:WP:AGF
3565:Aditya
3524:Bhutan
3423:Aditya
3356:Zayeem
3343:Aditya
3325:«Talk»
3304:Aditya
3257:«Talk»
3241:, not
3159:Zayeem
3128:Aditya
3048:Aditya
3013:Bhutan
2946:Bhutan
2594:Aditya
2564:Aditya
2497:Aditya
2415:Bhutan
1767:Aditya
1731:rarely
1686:Oppose
1673:Aditya
1562:Aditya
1540:Aditya
1504:Bhutan
1488:Oppose
1458:, the
1430:Aditya
1414:Update
1403:Zayeem
1373:, per
1352:- per
1268:Aditya
1208:Aditya
1091:Aditya
1071:always
1063:rarely
1042:or of
952:Aditya
894:Bhutan
855:Aditya
792:Aditya
761:Aditya
747:Aditya
742:Update
724:rose64
679:Aditya
657:rose64
639:Aditya
629:, and
619:Sitush
580:Aditya
338:Aditya
295:Aditya
240:Aditya
224:Does "
186:saying
160:Aditya
142:(talk)
5496:WP:RS
5429:SAARC
5403:SAARC
5280:This
5040:WP:RS
4035:mmann
3971:India
3532:Nepal
3528:India
3239:Tamil
3021:Nepal
3017:India
2954:Nepal
2950:India
2749:mmann
2685:India
2423:Nepal
2419:India
2164:mmann
2091:India
1512:Nepal
1508:India
1466:term.
1356:. --
1075:never
967:Kabul
963:agree
902:Nepal
898:India
708:, so
694:brief
384:). I
16:<
5946:talk
5932:talk
5917:Talk
5898:talk
5861:talk
5846:talk
5832:talk
5817:talk
5796:talk
5782:talk
5767:talk
5747:talk
5725:talk
5710:talk
5696:talk
5681:talk
5650:talk
5627:talk
5607:talk
5592:talk
5573:talk
5553:talk
5527:talk
5460:talk
5411:talk
5405:. -
5375:talk
5353:talk
5332:talk
5317:talk
5266:Help
5228:talk
5211:talk
5197:talk
5164:talk
5140:talk
5102:talk
5052:talk
5022:talk
5003:talk
4999:Sych
4982:talk
4940:ISBN
4928:ISBN
4915:ISBN
4902:ISBN
4889:ISBN
4876:ISBN
4836:talk
4805:talk
4797:Yes,
4788:talk
4695:keep
4659:talk
4622:ISBN
4609:ISBN
4596:ISBN
4583:ISBN
4570:ISBN
4557:ISBN
4544:ISBN
4524:ISBN
4475:and
4438:ISBN
4425:ISBN
4412:ISBN
4399:ISBN
4379:ISBN
4330:and
4304:talk
4278:talk
4237:talk
4201:ISBN
4189:ISBN
4177:ISBN
4164:ISBN
4152:ISBN
4139:ISBN
4117:ISBN
4104:ISBN
4091:ISBN
4078:ISBN
4058:ISBN
3973:and
3948:ISBN
3889:and
3869:and
3857:talk
3828:and
3761:talk
3712:talk
3677:talk
3642:talk
3581:talk
3550:and
3538:and
3489:talk
3450:talk
3411:and
3175:talk
3142:talk
3062:talk
3039:and
3027:and
2997:talk
2915:ISBN
2903:ISBN
2891:ISBN
2878:ISBN
2866:ISBN
2853:ISBN
2831:ISBN
2818:ISBN
2805:ISBN
2792:ISBN
2772:ISBN
2687:and
2662:ISBN
2582:talk
2541:talk
2527:talk
2513:talk
2465:and
2429:and
2354:ISBN
2341:ISBN
2328:ISBN
2315:ISBN
2295:ISBN
2275:ISBN
2262:ISBN
2249:ISBN
2236:ISBN
2216:ISBN
2193:ISBN
2093:and
2068:ISBN
2044:ISBN
2025:ISBN
1994:ISBN
1982:ISBN
1970:ISBN
1957:ISBN
1945:ISBN
1932:ISBN
1906:ISBN
1894:ISBN
1882:ISBN
1863:ISBN
1844:ISBN
1823:ISBN
1759:and
1744:talk
1738:).
1698:talk
1662:talk
1518:and
1418:The
1398:. --
1383:talk
1362:talk
1287:talk
1251:talk
1234:team
1228:You
1171:and
1157:talk
1025:talk
1001:talk
983:talk
920:and
908:and
778:talk
728:talk
726:🌹 (
690:long
661:talk
659:🌹 (
470:and
439:. I
347:Case
284:The
124:and
5582:Sst
5492:not
4828:Yes
4814:Yes
4780:Yes
4760:Yes
4645:Re
3839:.
3245:or
1449:or
1278:not
1242:and
1069:or
722:Red
655:Red
493:).
335:).
5948:)
5934:)
5914:|
5908:--
5900:)
5863:)
5848:)
5842:JM
5834:)
5819:)
5798:)
5792:JM
5784:)
5769:)
5749:)
5727:)
5712:)
5698:)
5683:)
5652:)
5629:)
5609:)
5594:)
5575:)
5555:)
5529:)
5462:)
5413:)
5377:)
5355:)
5334:)
5319:)
5230:)
5213:)
5199:)
5166:)
5142:)
5104:)
5054:)
5024:)
5005:)
4984:)
4838:)
4807:)
4790:)
4705:--
4679:.
4661:)
4649:,
4306:)
4280:)
4239:)
4041:).
4019:).
3997:).
3977:."
3969:,
3893:.
3859:)
3783:--
3763:)
3718:)
3714:•
3679:)
3644:)
3583:)
3534:,
3530:,
3526:,
3522:,
3491:)
3452:)
3407:,
3403:,
3177:)
3144:)
3115:,
3111:,
3107:,
3103:,
3099:,
3095:,
3091:,
3064:)
3023:,
3019:,
3015:,
3011:,
2999:)
2960:,
2956:,
2952:,
2948:,
2944:,
2755:).
2733:).
2711:).
2691:."
2683:,
2584:)
2543:)
2529:)
2515:)
2425:,
2421:,
2417:,
2413:,
2177:^
2170:).
2152:^
2145:).
2127:^
2120:).
2102:^
2097:."
2089:,
2053:^
2007:).
1915:^
1746:)
1700:)
1664:)
1514:,
1510:,
1506:,
1502:,
1445:,
1385:)
1364:)
1289:)
1253:)
1159:)
1107:.
1059:is
1027:)
1003:)
985:)
961:I
904:,
900:,
896:,
892:,
884::
780:)
772:--
730:)
663:)
625:,
621:,
577:.
566:me
544:me
524:).
485:me
402:.
398:me
392:.
333:05
331:,
329:04
327:,
325:03
323:,
321:02
319:,
317:01
313:03
311:,
309:02
307:,
305:01
210:)?
96:.
5944:(
5930:(
5896:(
5859:(
5844:(
5830:(
5815:(
5794:(
5780:(
5765:(
5745:(
5723:(
5708:(
5694:(
5679:(
5648:(
5625:(
5605:(
5590:(
5571:(
5551:(
5525:(
5505:"
5482:"
5458:(
5409:(
5389:"
5373:(
5351:(
5330:(
5315:(
5301:.
5258:)
5254:(
5246::
5242:@
5226:(
5219:@
5209:(
5195:(
5162:(
5138:(
5119:)
5115:(
5100:(
5087:)
5083:(
5071::
5067:@
5050:(
5036::
5032:@
5020:(
5001:(
4980:(
4834:(
4803:(
4786:(
4768:-
4752:)
4748:(
4703:)
4699:(
4657:(
4334:.
4302:(
4276:(
4259:-
4251::
4247:@
4235:(
3946:(
3855:(
3792:)
3788:(
3759:(
3710:(
3675:(
3640:(
3609:.
3601:.
3579:(
3487:(
3471:)
3467:(
3448:(
3268:(
3173:(
3140:(
3123::
3087:@
3079:)
3075:(
3060:(
3043:.
2995:(
2980:)
2976:(
2660:(
2611:)
2607:(
2580:(
2554::
2550:@
2539:(
2525:(
2511:(
2479::
2455::
2437:.
2200:.
2066:(
1742:(
1718:C
1716:/
1714:T
1696:(
1660:(
1655::
1651:@
1648::
1644:@
1381:(
1360:(
1342:)
1338:(
1285:(
1249:(
1225:.
1190:.
1155:(
1145:.
1023:(
999:(
981:(
924:.
840::
836:@
805::
801:@
776:(
674::
670:@
501:.
474:.
457::
414::
359::
212:(
134:)
130:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.