Knowledge

Talk:Joint Venture Protective Carbine/Archive 1

Source šŸ“

31: 87:. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly. 137: 74:
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Knowledge. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good
805:
in English, which is what the naming criteria prefer. "Precision" in this case refers to what is necessary in order to distinguish this article's title from the topics of other articles. It does not refer to the "correctness" of a particular title, an issue on which Knowledge takes no position.
545:
Sorry, I missed where you said "precision" before. So you're saying the current title is ambiguous? And the first-cited 2015 article uses both names. We don't usually go so much by official as by common names, so that's what you need to provide evidence of.
851:
from the JVPC. The MSMC was a prototype, and the JVPC is a different weapon. So why not just create a new article about the JVPC instead of trying to change the topic of this article? We seem to have more information here about the MSMC than about the JVPC.
801:. That isnā€™t valid since 'Modern Sub Machine Carbine' is no longer even a nickname." However, whether one or the other name is official or a nickname or neither is immaterial. There has been no evidence presented that the proposed title is the 955:
If people think Iā€™m right, then I think the page should be changed. If Iā€™m incorrect, well, it wonā€™t be the first or last time I was wrong, no problem. Didnā€™t want to change the article without making sure these changes are ok, though.
742:
The MSMC also was unable to clear the Indian Army's requirements and DRDO and OFB jointly started development of a carbine from scratch called the JVPC which showed promise in the initial round of trials.
975:
Article has unneeded duplicate citations. When several sentences in a row are ended with the same cite, the final cite in the series is the only necessary one. Still, better over-cited than non-cited.
195: 83:. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the 722:. That isnā€™t valid since ā€œModern Sub Machine Carbineā€ is no longer even a nickname. It has been subtly abandoned without much publicity, even though it sounds cooler than ā€œJVPCā€. 870:
I doubt the prototype and production version are notable enough to justify separate articles. The former can be covered in a subsection of the article since it is background.
949:
The reason I think this is because it fires a PDW cartridge and, what is basically the definition of a PDW, was fired a higher caliber to beat contemporary body armor.
79:. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the 342: 247: 243: 229: 196:
https://web.archive.org/web/20151006031925/http://www.defencenow.com/news/284/arde-develops-new-version-of-modern-sub-machine-carbine-for-indian-army.html
381:
states this to be the gun's actual name and we should stick to that. Since 2014, virtually every official document have used JVPC as the gun's name.
797:
unless evidence of the common name in reliable, independent sources is presented. It is written above that "The primary opposition to this move is
199: 766:
Yes. As I wrote above, MSMC appears to have been a concept study (a prototype). JVPC is the final product. Read the reply by Sandeep Unnithan to
47: 17: 318:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
225:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
215: 185: 830:
of COMMONNAME please, form either side of the debate. In the lack of either I think that the name defaults to the established one.
740:
This line currently in the article gives me an indication the two (MSMC & JVPC) are not the same thing, not even a renaming - "
560:
I guess if new documents and articles have more prevalence of use of JVPC instead of MSMC, it qualifies to be the new common name.
366: 464:: I am fairly surprised that people are even thinking of opposing the move. This should ideally have been an unambiguous move. 144:
This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.ā€”
80: 76: 290: 757: 706: 205: 897: 378: 362: 169: 38: 912: 446: 416: 309: 246:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
495: 374: 200:
http://www.defencenow.com/news/284/arde-develops-new-version-of-modern-sub-machine-carbine-for-indian-army.html
984: 980: 965: 939: 902: 879: 861: 839: 815: 783: 761: 753: 735: 715: 710: 702: 685: 660: 642: 616: 598: 584: 566: 555: 540: 507: 485: 449: 418: 355: 336: 295: 281: 177: 155: 129: 835: 798: 719: 648: 173: 961: 924: 920: 857: 780: 767: 732: 682: 613: 581: 537: 482: 391: 331:. Consensus is against moving the page. There has been no evidence given that the proposed title is the 319: 265:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
253: 150: 124: 892: 176:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 957: 802: 638: 562: 434: 404: 332: 322:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
84: 701:
simple enough, please could someone take the time to simplify this discussion a bit more. Thanks!
976: 875: 811: 656: 594: 551: 503: 469: 431:
members of WikiProjects Military history, Firearms and India have been notified of this request.
351: 216:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110116175817/http://bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=14166
186:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110723085406/http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensenews.jsp?id=4106
112: 524: 250:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
266: 831: 466:
Not even a single official Indian government document calls this "Modern Sub Machine Carbine"
219: 853: 774: 749: 726: 676: 607: 575: 531: 476: 385: 145: 119: 891:
Per Dekimasu, Gog the Mild, and others. Usual waste of time by "official XYZ" promoters.
273: 189: 943: 232:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 75:
link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the
847:: After reading the article and reviewing the comments, it appears that the MSMC is a 272:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
871: 807: 667: 652: 590: 547: 514: 499: 347: 672:
I am assuming you understand the difference between offical name and rechristening.
206:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110301114359/http://www.thegunzone.com/556dw-16.html
523:
to call it MSMC now. All Offical press releases since 2014 call it JVPC. Here's
472:) for quite sometime now. All of them call it "Join Venture Protective Carbine". 239: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
460: 238:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 745: 636:- In case we have an official name, its shift is supposed to be reflected. 111:
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact
209: 339:
is according to primary sources such as official websites and tweets.
441: 411: 519:
Precision: MSMC has been renamed JVPC sometime in 2014. It would be
25: 919:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
946:(SMG). I think the article should reflect it being a PDW. 220:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=14166
180:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
91:
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
718:, It is simple. The primary opposition to this move is 494:ā€“Ā I don't understand the rationale. What provision at 190:
http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensenews.jsp?id=4106
911:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
744:" The CLAWS site to which this is cited also gives a 571:
MSMC was a concept study; JVPC is the final product.
96:
http://www.army-technology.com/news/news104162.html
242:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 927:. No further edits should be made to this section. 228:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 589:Sounds plausible. Do sources support that? 308:The following is a closed discussion of a 115:and ask him to program me with more info. 168:I have just modified 4 external links on 70:Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 210:http://www.thegunzone.com/556dw-16.html 161:External links modified (February 2018) 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 118:From your friendly hard working bot.ā€” 18:Talk:Joint Venture Protective Carbine 7: 327:The result of the move request was: 826:I am with Dekimasu. Could we have 468:(emphasis purposefully added; not 24: 952:Itā€™s even called a SMG Carbine. 647:My point is that that's not what 172:. Please take a moment to review 603:See my reply to DTM below. Best, 367:Joint Venture Protective Carbine 135: 29: 301:Requested move 2 December 2019 1: 903:02:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 880:01:02, 15 December 2019 (UTC) 862:23:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC) 840:17:08, 14 December 2019 (UTC) 816:10:51, 11 December 2019 (UTC) 450:17:03, 14 December 2019 (UTC) 419:16:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC) 394:17:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 356:02:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 77:request page for whitelisting 985:23:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC) 966:12:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC) 784:18:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 762:12:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 752:, please help explain this. 736:13:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 711:11:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 686:08:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 661:05:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 643:05:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 617:12:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC) 599:04:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC) 585:08:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 567:05:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 556:04:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC) 541:18:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 508:18:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 486:19:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 296:08:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC) 934:Changes to call weapon PDW? 1000: 363:Modern Sub Machine Carbine 259:(last update: 5 June 2024) 170:Modern Sub Machine Carbine 165:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 938:I think this weapon is a 335:, regardless of what the 156:22:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC) 130:11:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC) 917:Please do not modify it. 498:is nom relying on here? 315:Please do not modify it. 102:\barmy-technology\.com\b 942:(PDW), as opposed to a 940:Personal Defense Weapon 104:on the local blacklist 81:blacklist request page 42:of past discussions. 240:regular verification 85:request page on meta 230:After February 2018 284:InternetArchiveBot 235:InternetArchiveBot 113:User:Cyberpower678 894:Fowler&fowler 814: 527:official website. 496:WP:NAMINGCRITERIA 453: 452: 421: 375:WP:NAMINGCRITERIA 346: 343:non-admin closure 260: 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 991: 900: 895: 810: 782: 777: 734: 729: 684: 679: 671: 615: 610: 583: 578: 539: 534: 518: 484: 479: 448: 444: 437: 427: 414: 407: 395: 393: 388: 340: 333:most common name 317: 294: 285: 258: 257: 236: 148: 143: 139: 138: 122: 103: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 999: 998: 994: 993: 992: 990: 989: 988: 973: 936: 931: 898: 893: 849:different topic 799:WP:OFFICIALNAME 775: 771: 727: 723: 720:WP:OFFICIALNAME 677: 673: 665: 649:WP:OFFICIALNAME 639:Aman Kumar Goel 608: 604: 576: 572: 563:Aman Kumar Goel 532: 528: 512: 477: 473: 442: 435: 412: 405: 386: 382: 379:Offical website 313: 303: 288: 283: 251: 244:have permission 234: 178:this simple FaQ 163: 154: 146: 136: 134: 128: 120: 101: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 997: 995: 972: 969: 944:submachine gun 935: 932: 930: 929: 913:requested move 907: 906: 905: 885: 884: 883: 882: 865: 864: 842: 818: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 569: 457: 456: 455: 454: 361: 359: 325: 324: 310:requested move 304: 302: 299: 278: 277: 270: 223: 222: 214:Added archive 212: 204:Added archive 202: 194:Added archive 192: 184:Added archive 162: 159: 152: 126: 109: 108: 107: 106: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 996: 987: 986: 982: 978: 977:Georgejdorner 970: 968: 967: 963: 959: 953: 950: 947: 945: 941: 933: 928: 926: 922: 918: 914: 909: 908: 904: 901: 896: 890: 887: 886: 881: 877: 873: 869: 868: 867: 866: 863: 859: 855: 850: 846: 843: 841: 837: 833: 829: 825: 824: 819: 817: 813: 809: 804: 800: 796: 793: 785: 781: 779: 778: 769: 765: 764: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 733: 731: 730: 721: 717: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 693: 687: 683: 681: 680: 669: 664: 663: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 641: 640: 635: 632: 631: 618: 614: 612: 611: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 582: 580: 579: 570: 568: 565: 564: 559: 558: 557: 553: 549: 544: 543: 542: 538: 536: 535: 526: 522: 516: 511: 510: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 490: 489: 488: 487: 483: 481: 480: 471: 467: 463: 462: 451: 447: 445: 440: 439: 438: 430: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 420: 417: 415: 410: 409: 408: 401: 400: 392: 390: 389: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 358: 357: 353: 349: 344: 338: 337:official name 334: 330: 323: 321: 316: 311: 306: 305: 300: 298: 297: 292: 287: 286: 275: 271: 268: 264: 263: 262: 255: 249: 245: 241: 237: 231: 226: 221: 217: 213: 211: 207: 203: 201: 197: 193: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 179: 175: 171: 166: 160: 158: 157: 151: 149: 142: 132: 131: 125: 123: 116: 114: 105: 100:Triggered by 98: 97: 95: 94: 93: 92: 88: 86: 82: 78: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 974: 954: 951: 948: 937: 916: 910: 888: 848: 844: 832:Gog the Mild 827: 822: 820: 794: 773: 741: 725: 698: 694: 675: 637: 633: 606: 574: 561: 530: 520: 491: 475: 465: 459: 458: 436:PIĀ Ellsworth 433: 432: 429:Relist note: 428: 406:PIĀ Ellsworth 403: 402: 398: 397: 384: 370: 360: 328: 326: 314: 307: 282: 279: 254:source check 233: 227: 224: 167: 164: 140: 133: 117: 110: 99: 90: 89: 73: 60: 43: 37: 958:Doobiedoo86 925:move review 854:BarrelProof 803:common name 776:Vaibhavafro 750:Vaibhavafro 728:Vaibhavafro 678:Vaibhavafro 609:Vaibhavafro 577:Vaibhavafro 533:Vaibhavafro 478:Vaibhavafro 470:WP:SHOUTING 387:Vaibhavafro 320:move review 147:cyberbot II 121:cyberbot II 36:This is an 971:Over-cited 768:this tweet 697:Though it 461:Postscript 291:Report bug 921:talk page 872:-Fnlayson 746:404 error 521:imprecise 399:Relisted. 371:precision 329:Not moved 274:this tool 267:this tool 61:ArchiveĀ 1 923:or in a 828:evidence 808:Dekimasu 695:Comment: 668:Dicklyon 653:Dicklyon 591:Dicklyon 548:Dicklyon 515:Dicklyon 500:Dicklyon 348:Surachit 280:Cheers.ā€” 141:Resolved 845:Comment 823:Comment 770:by him. 634:Support 525:another 373:as per 174:my edit 39:archive 899:Ā«TalkĀ» 889:Oppose 821:Oppose 795:Oppose 651:says. 492:Oppose 369:ā€“ For 153:Online 127:Online 699:seems 16:< 981:talk 962:talk 876:talk 858:talk 836:talk 758:talk 707:talk 657:talk 595:talk 552:talk 504:talk 352:talk 754:DTM 716:DTM 703:DTM 443:ed. 413:ed. 248:RfC 218:to 208:to 198:to 188:to 983:) 964:) 915:. 878:) 860:) 838:) 812:悈! 772:ā€” 760:) 748:. 724:ā€” 709:) 674:ā€” 659:) 605:ā€” 597:) 573:ā€” 554:) 529:ā€” 506:) 474:ā€” 383:ā€” 377:. 365:ā†’ 354:) 312:. 261:. 256:}} 252:{{ 979:( 960:( 874:( 856:( 852:ā€” 834:( 756:( 705:( 670:: 666:@ 655:( 593:( 550:( 517:: 513:@ 502:( 396:ā€” 350:( 345:) 341:( 293:) 289:( 276:. 269:. 50:.

Index

Talk:Joint Venture Protective Carbine
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 1
request page for whitelisting
blacklist request page
request page on meta
User:Cyberpower678
cyberbot II

11:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
cyberbot II

22:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Modern Sub Machine Carbine
my edit
this simple FaQ
https://web.archive.org/web/20110723085406/http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensenews.jsp?id=4106
http://www.defenseworld.net/go/defensenews.jsp?id=4106
https://web.archive.org/web/20151006031925/http://www.defencenow.com/news/284/arde-develops-new-version-of-modern-sub-machine-carbine-for-indian-army.html
http://www.defencenow.com/news/284/arde-develops-new-version-of-modern-sub-machine-carbine-for-indian-army.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20110301114359/http://www.thegunzone.com/556dw-16.html
http://www.thegunzone.com/556dw-16.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20110116175817/http://bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=14166
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=14166
After February 2018
regular verification
have permission
RfC
source check

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘