1035:
comparison to the criticism. Googling "Jan Wong was right" gives 8 hits, within which are mostly blogger comments which are not useful for citations. So her point seems to be unilaterally condemned in the media and it's I think legitimate then to portray it here as such unless someone can find some support (I couldn't). My own complaint with this article is that there is detail, comprehensive, and then over the top in terms of listing the criticisms. Should every notable
Canadian that spoke on this issue be listed within the article? Where is enough enough and where does it begin detracting from the content of the article and begin instead to be simply burying the journalist? How much is enough to make the point here? We can take any jerk in history and insert a long list of people's comments condemning them and it does not make a wikipedia article.
302:
427:
368:
740:, rather than the Knowledge author presenting aspects of critiques of Wong's essay from (mass) publications. Therefore, I am uncertain how to edit the copy so that it more neutrally presents Wong's arguments and the published critiques of them, since I often times cannot distinguish between those critiques that were published after Wong's article and those criticisms that are actually the product of the Knowledge author.
417:
396:
292:
839:
cannot be pursuaded to return to the wikiarticle and remove those cricial comments which cannot be substantiated by citation to independent writers, then perhaps the article should simply be deleted. This would be unfortunate as the entire Wong incident proved very insightful vis-à -vis the relationship of Québec to its immigrant populations and the place of Québec in the
Canadian confederation.
265:
190:
234:
550:
reporting, and I found her work to be of a consistently high standard. Sure, she is provocative. Good for her. It would appear that with this column, she touched a raw nerve indeed. We used to say, "If the shoe fits, wear it." Apparently that rule has changed to, "If the shoe fits, beat up on the cobbler."
1034:
I don't think it's so easy to find anything in print that supports her. As one article put it from
Edmonton (critical of her), she broke a Canadian Taboo. People either pile on in this situation or, seeing the dogpile, slowly step back. That said I would speculate that any support for her is small in
838:
Those that are the critical viewpoint of the wikiauthor violate
Knowledge policy and need to be excised from the text. Ultimately, only the wikiauthor knows which of the critical viewpoints are his/hers and which are those of independent authors and are merely being reported herein. If the wikiauthor
766:
I had the same experience reading the article, and the skill with which "those critiques that were published after Wong's article and those criticisms that are actually the product of the
Knowledge author" are confounded in the article leads me to suspect the a professional writer worked very hard to
797:
section had a statement to the effect that
Montreal has one of the lowest crime rates in North America. The phrase, “in North America,” is misleading since it is a truism that every Canadian metropolitan area has a lower, per capita crime rate than comparable American metropolitan areas. Total bans
743:
My understanding of the role of
Knowledge as it would relate to the so-called “Jan Wong Controversy” is that the author of an article relating to the matter is supposed to fairly present the two sides of the debate. He is not to use the creation of the Knowledge article for the purposes of producing
505:
This entry, in its current form, seems almost entirely concerned with painting with Mrs. Wong's article in the worst possible light. I don't have an opinion on Mrs. Wong's article itself (in fact, I haven't read it and didn't even know about the controversy until reading about it here on
Knowledge),
996:
This article is basically a "Let's dump as much trash on top of this woman" kind of article. It is a very sexist and racist article that gives a lot of undue weight to all these different statements condemning her. It should be trimmed, and there should be enough counter viewpoints in favour of her
873:
article. Is this allowed at
Knowledge? To just up and delete an entire article without any discussion? Also, the small section of the article of which the Jan Wong Controversy is now a part reads more like an op/ed piece and less like an encyclopedia article than did the larger Jan Wong article it
549:
This piece is shockingly biased and should be corrected or deleted. There is a valid discussion to be had around the Jan Wong column and the political reaction to it, but this entry constitutes character assassination masquerading as discussion. For the record, I have been the subject of Jan Wong's
834:
did give rise to controversy in Canada, particularly in the province of Québec where it was especially relevant. However, it is difficult when reading this wikiarticle to discern which of the criticisms and viewpoints in opposition to Ms. Wong are from articles published by other commentators and
1293:
Hi all, I'm not too familiar with this topic, so I wanted to pose an edit request for someone who knows the topic better than myself. Shouldn't the title of the article (Jan Wong controversy) be bolded in the first sentence of the introduction? Right now, the introduction doesn't use that phrase
694:
Jan Wong lived in Quebec for years and never bothered to learn the language. No wonder she feels discriminated against. If I lived in
Toronto for years and didn't bother to learn english I would feel discirminated against too. But then again, maybe i could learn ? She knows nothing about Quebec
559:
I agree completely. I don't have an opinion on Wong's opinion piece - I haven't read it - but she is a totally legit journalist. No one seems to be concerned with the absolute chutzpah of Parliament calling on a journalist to waive her free speech. Accordingly, I'm tagging the article.
713:
Actually, Wong was born and raised in the west end of Montreal during the 1950s and 60s. It was an entirely English-speaking part of town. There was no practical need for anglophones to speak French at the time. I think Wong's analysis was bullshit, but I don't think you can fault her
604:
Er, who exactly decided "pure laine" was "deprecated"? It may be deeply politically incorrect to use nowadays, rather like the terms "Negro" or "Jewess" in English, but "deprecated" suggests it has been excised from the somehow language, which is obviously false.
1094:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! --
948:"However, five Canadian shootings out of eight have actually occurred outside Quebec, according to Bryan's own newspaper." (cites "Quand les fusibles sautent Ă Toronto" by the Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society, CNW Telbec, September 18, 2006.) marked
801:
However, in Canada itself, Montreal has the fourth highest crime rate, while Canada's largest city, Toronto, bottoms out the list of cities having populations of 500,000 or more. (See: Sauvé, Julie. “Crime Statistics in Canada, 2004.”
153:
608:
We should be able to say Jan Wong used the term without some mealymouthed qualifier explaining modern Quebecers don't use the term much now. Come to think of it, if it's really that important to mention, then
625:
I recall "pure laine" being used all the time in Quebec. That's not good enough for wikipedia of course. It comes up more often when the sovereignty movement is strong. Reference google ngrams:
747:
I think that before anyone can copy edit this article, the origiator of it needs to return to the article and distinguish his critiques from those that can be sourced to publications.
1134:
668:
It is interesting to note that those who reacted so negatively to her article are successful bilingual individuals who would not have had experienced the bias the article speaks of.
1154:
1362:
1192:
147:
898:
which contains much less detail on this spat. I think this is sufficiently notable for its own article, especially since it's specifically linked from the FA-level article
1202:
1466:
348:
1394:
1390:
1376:
1234:
1230:
1216:
732:
I tried to simply copy edit this article, but never got past the “article” section. The problem for me was that many of the sentences read as critiques of Wong’s
977:
I don't think the removal of these two statements affects the POV of the article in any significant way given that many other sources condemned Wong's article.
630:
626:
44:
1491:
483:
473:
210:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them.
918:. Now that some time has elapsed since the spat discussed in this article was hot off the press, the potential for a NPOV article has increased methinks.
665:
If one is to interview those individuals who are not French bilingual, there would be ample evidence that Jan Wong's observations are highly perceptive.
79:
997:
added, and yes they are absolutely out there. This has to be one of the most racist and sexist articles I have ever come across. It is very slanderous.
807:
846:
at the top of the page and await discussion, or should we have discussion first? As a wikinewbie I feel insufficiently experienced to make the call.
1496:
1461:
1135:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070311075939/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=7e75959e-b11b-4a7f-865d-2ec86fc78f4d&k=53879
1476:
1456:
910:— the latter has some issues, but it provides a level of detail that would seriously detract from reading the main article. However, that's not a
633:(english). It would appear that use is falling off but it's certainly not deprecated. I expect that if a new referendum comes up it will return.
358:
718:
for not speaking French, especially considering the last time she lived in the city was in the early 1970s. Montreal was very different then. --
1155:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121023005926/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=7558331f-14b9-4b1a-bfc1-e5a68dbe3999&k=47772
197:
1366:
1481:
1363:
https://archive.is/20120716040357/http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/05/20/jan-wong-why-i-was-hated-in-quebec-and-abandoned-in-toronto/
678:
585:
449:
85:
1193:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121025033605/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/columnists/story.html?id=6b3b71de-f7b6-442b-83a8-4f6245f23404
1138:
1486:
702:
1042:
774:
640:
532:
1158:
525:
I agree, this article is just a long list of "OMG, then Billy said he didn't like it. OMG, then Jane said it made her mad. Then..."
1203:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121025040555/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=68973176-3342-4164-b62c-ed7eb0beaace
1372:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1212:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1196:
324:
1342:
168:
1471:
907:
440:
401:
135:
899:
213:
201:
99:
30:
1206:
104:
20:
631:
http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pure+laine&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3
627:
http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pure+laine&year_start=1800&year_end=2010&corpus=7&smoothing=3
74:
865:
I don’t know if anyone will ever notice, but the Jan Wong article has completely disappeared and insteads redirects to a
1437:
1277:
377:
315:
275:
270:
245:
1021:
129:
65:
1067:
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at
1299:
843:
682:
125:
1393:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1233:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1144:
589:
706:
1186:
1428:
1356:
1326:
1268:
1126:
1046:
778:
644:
536:
219:
175:
109:
1367:
http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/05/20/jan-wong-why-i-was-hated-in-quebec-and-abandoned-in-toronto/
1322:
1017:
884:
851:
816:
757:
570:
561:
1139:
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=7e75959e-b11b-4a7f-865d-2ec86fc78f4d&k=53879
1412:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1400:
1295:
1294:
verbatim. If no one takes care of this, I'll do my best to give it a stab in the next few days. Thanks.
1252:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1240:
895:
870:
512:
251:
1325:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1125:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
830:
The idea behind this wikiarticle is a good one. The Jan Wong essay published on the front page of the
719:
1318:
1118:
1077:
This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
1038:
866:
794:
770:
698:
674:
636:
581:
528:
24:
1159:
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=7558331f-14b9-4b1a-bfc1-e5a68dbe3999&k=47772
233:
1172:
982:
923:
161:
55:
448:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
323:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
141:
1350:
1336:
1197:
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/columnists/story.html?id=6b3b71de-f7b6-442b-83a8-4f6245f23404
1180:
1166:
1016:"in favour of her" that are missing? If not, I'm going to suggest we remove your neutrality tag.
903:
70:
1397:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1343:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060915.wxshooting-main16/BNStory/National/
1237:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1413:
1253:
671:
The lack of reaction from the rest of Canada should indicate that this entry lacks objectivity.
1100:
880:
847:
812:
753:
551:
432:
207:
51:
1083:
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
951:
You need a source that specifically points out this error in Wong's article. Otherwise it's
507:
1420:
1260:
1080:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
1207:
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=68973176-3342-4164-b62c-ed7eb0beaace
1002:
968:, two universities, and a vast number of health, media, and various other organizations.
902:. Articles like this are usually controversial, but they should still exist. Compare with
1379:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1219:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
978:
956:
938:
934:
919:
915:
614:
1419:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1259:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
806:
Volume 25, number 5. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Statistics Canada. 2005.
1450:
911:
307:
1096:
1068:
1061:
1013:
952:
367:
1386:
1226:
1442:
1303:
1282:
1104:
1050:
1025:
1006:
986:
964:
However, it is actually composed of over 400,000 individuals, controlling five
927:
888:
855:
820:
782:
761:
722:
648:
617:
593:
573:
564:
554:
540:
517:
1385:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1225:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
998:
610:
445:
422:
416:
395:
297:
291:
264:
578:
pure laine isn't that antiquated - I recall it being used pretty frequently
1145:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120220125124/http://www.davidhayes.ca/wong.htm
506:
but this entry is definitely not neutral in tone and needs to be fixed. --
222:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
1187:
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/entertainment/Wong%2Bblues/6566814/story.html
1086:
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
1357:
http://www.google.ca/blogsearch?hl=fr&q=%22Jan+Wong%22+Quebec&lr=
842:
My next question is, should I go ahead and place the appropriate tag for
320:
1148:
798:
on handguns will tend to reduce overall crime rates in any country.
965:
744:
a (self-)published essay in which he also takes Ms. Wong to task.
1173:
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/MediaNews/2006/09/21/1872721-cp.html
227:
184:
15:
662:
The subject of Jan Wong's article is a very relevant issue.
366:
1329:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1129:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
695:
because she never made the effort to understand anything.
1122:
160:
1288:
Edit Request: Bolding Topic in Introduction Paragraph
959:, especially since the cited article precedes Wong's.
835:
which are the critical viewpoints of the wikiauthor.
444:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
319:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1389:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1229:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
900:École_Polytechnique_massacre#Search_for_a_rationale
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1060:removing POV tag with no active discussion per
1375:This message was posted before February 2018.
1215:This message was posted before February 2018.
174:
8:
1317:I have just modified one external link on
696:
672:
390:
259:
1117:I have just modified 5 external links on
944:I've removed the following statements:
392:
261:
231:
1467:Low-importance Canada-related articles
7:
894:This article had been redirected to
438:This article is within the scope of
313:This article is within the scope of
250:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1492:Low-importance Journalism articles
738:as written by the Knowledge author
613:deserves an article of its own. --
14:
1321:. Please take a moment to review
1149:http://www.davidhayes.ca/wong.htm
1121:. Please take a moment to review
908:Opposition to water fluoridation
458:Knowledge:WikiProject Journalism
425:
415:
394:
300:
290:
263:
232:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1497:WikiProject Journalism articles
1462:B-Class Canada-related articles
690:Does anyone speak french here ?
478:This article has been rated as
461:Template:WikiProject Journalism
353:This article has been rated as
212:Content must be written from a
196:The subject of this article is
1477:Low-importance Quebec articles
1457:Knowledge controversial topics
767:make the article uneditable.
1:
1443:19:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
1026:14:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
987:20:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
971:The same observation applies.
928:19:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
889:23:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
856:06:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
821:06:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
783:07:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
762:11:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
574:01:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
565:01:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
452:and see a list of open tasks.
375:This article is supported by
327:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1482:All WikiProject Canada pages
861:Disappearance of the Article
618:21:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
555:15:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
333:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
1487:B-Class Journalism articles
1007:01:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
750:Any suggestions? Comments?
518:15:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
336:Template:WikiProject Canada
206:When updating the article,
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1513:
1406:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1314:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1304:17:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
1283:23:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
1246:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1114:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
992:Article gives undue weight
906:, which has a sub-article
723:09:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
569:Oh, there's the tag! Duh!
484:project's importance scale
359:project's importance scale
1105:15:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
658:Linguistic discrimination
477:
410:
374:
352:
285:
258:
208:be bold, but not reckless
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1051:15:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
877:… I just don’t get it …
649:14:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
594:16:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
541:14:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
1472:B-Class Quebec articles
1310:External links modified
1110:External links modified
339:Canada-related articles
914:for steamrolling over
441:WikiProject Journalism
371:
240:This article is rated
200:and content may be in
75:avoid personal attacks
896:Anti-Quebec sentiment
874:purports to replace!
871:Anti-Quebec sentiment
789:Montréal’s Crime Rate
370:
214:neutral point of view
100:Neutral point of view
1387:regular verification
1319:Jan Wong controversy
1227:regular verification
1119:Jan Wong controversy
105:No original research
25:Jan Wong controversy
1377:After February 2018
1217:After February 2018
464:Journalism articles
1431:InternetArchiveBot
1382:InternetArchiveBot
1271:InternetArchiveBot
1222:InternetArchiveBot
904:Water fluoridation
826:Mark for Deletion?
378:WikiProject Quebec
372:
316:WikiProject Canada
246:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1407:
1306:
1247:
1041:comment added by
1018:Shawn in Montreal
844:proposed deletion
773:comment added by
710:
701:comment added by
686:
685:) 5 November 2006
677:comment added by
639:comment added by
584:comment added by
571:Carolynparrishfan
562:Carolynparrishfan
531:comment added by
498:
497:
494:
493:
490:
489:
433:Journalism portal
389:
388:
385:
384:
226:
225:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1504:
1441:
1432:
1405:
1404:
1383:
1354:
1340:
1296:Thefjordhusky201
1292:
1281:
1272:
1245:
1244:
1223:
1184:
1170:
1053:
832:Globe & Mail
793:The text in the
785:
734:Globe & Mail
651:
596:
543:
466:
465:
462:
459:
456:
435:
430:
429:
428:
419:
412:
411:
406:
398:
391:
341:
340:
337:
334:
331:
310:
305:
304:
303:
294:
287:
286:
281:
278:
267:
260:
243:
237:
236:
228:
192:
191:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1447:
1446:
1435:
1430:
1398:
1391:have permission
1381:
1348:
1334:
1327:this simple FaQ
1312:
1290:
1275:
1270:
1238:
1231:have permission
1221:
1178:
1164:
1127:this simple FaQ
1112:
1065:
1036:
994:
942:
863:
828:
791:
768:
730:
709:) 20 April 2007
692:
679:205.188.116.133
660:
634:
602:
586:173.180.199.227
579:
526:
503:
463:
460:
457:
454:
453:
431:
426:
424:
404:
338:
335:
332:
329:
328:
306:
301:
299:
279:
273:
244:on Knowledge's
241:
189:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1510:
1508:
1500:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1449:
1448:
1425:
1424:
1417:
1370:
1369:
1361:Added archive
1359:
1345:
1311:
1308:
1289:
1286:
1265:
1264:
1257:
1210:
1209:
1201:Added archive
1199:
1191:Added archive
1189:
1175:
1161:
1153:Added archive
1151:
1143:Added archive
1141:
1133:Added archive
1111:
1108:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1029:
1028:
993:
990:
975:
974:
973:
972:
962:
961:
960:
941:
932:
931:
930:
862:
859:
827:
824:
790:
787:
729:
726:
703:132.204.116.31
691:
688:
659:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
601:
598:
547:
546:
545:
544:
502:
499:
496:
495:
492:
491:
488:
487:
480:Low-importance
476:
470:
469:
467:
450:the discussion
437:
436:
420:
408:
407:
405:Low‑importance
399:
387:
386:
383:
382:
373:
363:
362:
355:Low-importance
351:
345:
344:
342:
325:the discussion
312:
311:
295:
283:
282:
280:Low‑importance
268:
256:
255:
249:
238:
224:
223:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1509:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1452:
1445:
1444:
1439:
1434:
1433:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1402:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1358:
1352:
1346:
1344:
1338:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1315:
1309:
1307:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1287:
1285:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1273:
1262:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1242:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1188:
1182:
1176:
1174:
1168:
1162:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1115:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1070:
1063:
1059:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1043:24.57.246.210
1040:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1012:Can you cite
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
991:
989:
988:
984:
980:
970:
969:
967:
963:
958:
954:
950:
949:
947:
946:
945:
940:
936:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:carte blanche
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
892:
891:
890:
886:
882:
878:
875:
872:
868:
867:small section
860:
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
840:
836:
833:
825:
823:
822:
818:
814:
810:
808:
805:
799:
796:
788:
786:
784:
780:
776:
775:99.246.170.13
772:
764:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
745:
741:
739:
735:
727:
725:
724:
721:
717:
711:
708:
704:
700:
689:
687:
684:
680:
676:
669:
666:
663:
657:
650:
646:
642:
641:24.57.246.210
638:
632:
629:(french) and
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
616:
612:
606:
599:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
576:
575:
572:
567:
566:
563:
557:
556:
553:
542:
538:
534:
533:24.57.246.210
530:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
515:
514:
509:
500:
485:
481:
475:
472:
471:
468:
451:
447:
443:
442:
434:
423:
421:
418:
414:
413:
409:
403:
400:
397:
393:
380:
379:
369:
365:
364:
360:
356:
350:
347:
346:
343:
326:
322:
318:
317:
309:
308:Canada portal
298:
296:
293:
289:
288:
284:
277:
272:
269:
266:
262:
257:
253:
247:
239:
235:
230:
229:
221:
217:
215:
209:
205:
203:
199:
198:controversial
194:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1429:
1426:
1401:source check
1380:
1374:
1371:
1316:
1313:
1291:
1269:
1266:
1241:source check
1220:
1214:
1211:
1116:
1113:
1093:
1069:Template:POV
1066:
1062:Template:POV
1037:— Preceding
995:
976:
943:
881:SpikeToronto
879:
876:
864:
848:SpikeToronto
841:
837:
831:
829:
813:SpikeToronto
811:
803:
800:
792:
765:
754:SpikeToronto
752:
749:
746:
742:
737:
733:
731:
728:Copy editing
715:
712:
697:— Preceding
693:
673:— Preceding
670:
667:
664:
661:
635:— Preceding
607:
603:
580:— Preceding
577:
568:
558:
552:Serial Comma
548:
527:— Preceding
513:cheeks clone
511:
504:
501:NPOV dispute
479:
439:
376:
354:
314:
252:WikiProjects
211:
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
939:synthesized
769:—Preceding
720:Kilgore MTL
148:free images
31:not a forum
1451:Categories
1438:Report bug
1278:Report bug
716:personally
611:pure laine
600:Deprecated
455:Journalism
446:journalism
402:Journalism
1421:this tool
1414:this tool
1351:dead link
1337:dead link
1261:this tool
1254:this tool
1181:dead link
1167:dead link
979:Xasodfuih
935:Npovified
920:Xasodfuih
615:Saforrest
220:citations
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1427:Cheers.—
1267:Cheers.—
1039:unsigned
804:Juristat
771:unsigned
699:unsigned
675:unsigned
637:unsigned
582:unsigned
529:unsigned
218:Include
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1355:tag to
1341:tag to
1323:my edit
1185:tag to
1171:tag to
1123:my edit
1097:Khazar2
957:WP:SYNT
916:WP:NPOV
869:of the
795:ARTICLE
736:piece,
482:on the
357:on the
242:B-class
202:dispute
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1347:Added
1333:Added
1177:Added
1163:Added
966:CEGEPs
508:Schnee
330:Canada
321:Canada
276:Quebec
271:Canada
248:scale.
126:Google
1014:WP:RS
999:Laval
953:WP:OR
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1300:talk
1101:talk
1047:talk
1022:talk
1003:talk
983:talk
937:, de
924:talk
885:talk
852:talk
817:talk
779:talk
758:talk
707:talk
683:talk
645:talk
590:talk
537:talk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1395:RfC
1365:to
1235:RfC
1205:to
1195:to
1157:to
1147:to
1137:to
474:Low
349:Low
176:TWL
1453::
1408:.
1403:}}
1399:{{
1353:}}
1349:{{
1339:}}
1335:{{
1302:)
1248:.
1243:}}
1239:{{
1183:}}
1179:{{
1169:}}
1165:{{
1103:)
1071::
1049:)
1024:)
1005:)
985:)
926:)
887:)
854:)
819:)
809:)
781:)
760:)
647:)
592:)
539:)
516:)
274::
156:)
54:;
1440:)
1436:(
1423:.
1416:.
1298:(
1280:)
1276:(
1263:.
1256:.
1099:(
1045:(
1020:(
1001:(
981:(
955:/
922:(
883:(
850:(
815:(
777:(
756:(
705:(
681:(
643:(
588:(
535:(
510:(
486:.
381:.
361:.
254::
216:.
204:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
