31:
2489:, or in in any topic between any two of these files, should mean less work to come if/when those files are merged later: e.g. if the matter about theophoric names is only on one of these files, then it will not have to be merged later as files are merged. If we gradually remove all content forking and information duplication between these files, then merging all or some of the files at the end will be easy.
1386:: Early Christian Greek transcriptions are the only transcriptions that we have from the early Hebrew spoken priestly tradition straight into an alphabet with a full vowel system. The Roman-alphabet spelling "Yahweh" is a modern reconstruction partly based on the early Greek transcriptions. The Roman-alphabet spelling "Jehovah" came from the well-known medieval European error misreading the Hebrew text.
2637:" where the latter is an example only that might be modified, depending on where this information is supposed to be. (It could also be a section in an article). I may try it out as example. On the other hand, if you want to consolidate the information in one place, why would you want to redirect related terms not there but to a dab page?--
273:
The
Knowledge Article:Jehovah and the Knowledge Article:Yahweh are two different articles. The Knowledge Article:Jehovah was started by persons who wanted to write an article on the name Jehovah, not by persons who wanted to write an article on the name Yahweh. Persons who want to write an article on
2628:
was still a separate article and seemed to me the logical target for most content related redirects such as the ones you mention while I see the dab purpose more on the lexigraphical side. We do not know what someone actually has in mind when typing or checking a link to, or being redirected to e.g.
2468:
Since I presently find myself on
Knowledge, trying to support efforts by Jehovah's Witnesses to have an article titled Jehovah-xxx, and since I don't believe in what I consider to be their non-Christian Doctrines, I am going to drop out of further discussions concerning the Article:Jehovah, and just
2461:
One reason
Jehovah's Witnesses disagree with KJVO Christians, is that the underlying Hebrew of the Old Testament of the KJV preserves (Y)Jehovah 6518 times, but the KJV translators only translated (Y)Jehovah as Jehovah seven times. That forces KJVO Christians to offer a reasonable explanation of why
2390:
I took a brief look at the article as a whole. My impression is the article is derailed right out of the gate by the introduction mentioning particular religious perspectives. Such information should be part of the body of presentation and not the introduction. Jehovah or Yahweh or
Whatever is first
2186:
The article
Jehovah_JW would appeal to Jehovah's Witnesses, the article Jehovah_KJV hopefully would appeal to KJVO Christians and to persons wanting to get a thourough understanding of why there is almost a 100% consensus among scholars that Jehovah is not actually God's name, yet there are scholars
1784:
but the fact remains that, for the average reader, this is not something that they can really understand or that they care about that deeply. I would wager that the average JW "knows" that "Jehovah" is the "right name" for their God but not many would be able to give you a deep erudite discourse on
1716:
articles risks "losing the forest for the trees". The average reader will not want to understand and follow the linguistic issues since most readers probably won't know enough Hebrew to follow it. (I certainly don't). My proposal is that we give the reader a synopsis of the linguistic issues and a
1310:
which discuss briefly the history of how that form of the name came to be differentiated from other transcriptions and who uses that particular transcription. However, I think there should be a single article that discusses the transcription issue. I don't understand why there should be an article
521:
Historical information about the rendering "Jehovah" belongs in
Tetragrammaton; there is not enough content to justify a separate article. Even if there were, that isn't the issue right now. The issue is whether there should be an article devoted to a sectarian defense of a mistaken transliteration;
2135:
Ah, but this still doesn't explain why Seeker02421 suggests that there should be separate articles for
Jehovah that the JWs can edit to their heart's content. I oppose this idea on the grounds that it would create a POV fork. What I'm trying to understand is what problem this solution is intended
1796:
and that this isn't something a Hebrew or Jew would say but that many
Christians would (except for JWs and some others). Thus, I would restructure the article with the sections in the following order "Usage", "Attributes", "Derivation", "The Name" with much of the section "The Name" being moved to
1066:
to try to cure some of the content-forking, but the job got complicated and it got late at night (my time here in
England is Knowledge signature time plus one hour: Wiki 22:57 = 3 minutes to midnight here), so I realized that I better back out and try again in the morning, and that I better discuss
2623:
It seems now to me that the main discrepancy is between approaching "disambiguation as the process of resolving conflicts in article titles that occur when a single term can be associated with more than one topic", while you're trying to solve the problem that more than one term is associated with
2764:
The name written as YeHoWaH (Jehovah) is as old as the Hebrew scrolls of the Hebrew bible manuscripts from at least 1000 years ago. Everybody knows best en they say we know best but they dont even know the name of source of all. All bibles en the koran are just copies and are written by their own
1998:
Jehovah’s
Witnesses seem to look at the name Jehovah as being the traditional name of God, that is known all over the world, although it may be spelled slightly differently in each language. The official Watchtower Site acknowledges up front, that they don’t believe that Jehovah actually has the
1881:
Are you therefore asserting that it is folly to try and park all the "transcription issues" in a separate article because these issues are at the very core of whether to use "Jehovah" rather than "Yahweh"? That we can't have a brief summary of the issues in Jehovah and Yahweh and a "main article"
679:
article. That makes a certain amount of sense but I have to say that it is not very satisfying because who the hell says "Hear O Israel, the Lord our Tetragrammaton is One" or "I believe in Tetragrammaton the Father and in Jesus Christ his only Son"? Ain't nobody but a Biblical scholar going to
2542:
and added the Jehova related entries there. While this has some merit, it also results immediately in questions about how exactly the respective entries should be represented and my further edits have been reverted. I have now separated the two disambiguation pages again and linked them two each
1026:
A fact.. "Jehovah" has been used by many Christian groups for many many years as Gods name. There is a group of people numbering in the 6-7 million range that go door to door in virtually every country pretty much at least once a week or more telling people that Gods name is Jehovah. Millions of
2609:
Well, from my side your additions looked like a variation of earlier unilaterally redirecting Jehovah to Yahweh or wherelse. However, I saw some advantages in having only one dab page, so I did not revert your edit but was neither satisfied with the new unified page. (My first edit was in my
2595:
wants narrow information on that English rendering rather than about all renderings or the Deity Himself? The only way to make sure everyone gets where they're going is to consolidate the information about the name into one article and make the others redirects to the disambiguation page.
1747:
The history of attempts to write the Tetragrammaton in the Greek and Roman alphabets, including the old "Jehovah" mistranscription and how the resulting scholarly dispute was eventually resolved. This will inevitably tie in with the history of theories about how Y-H-W-H was pronounced in
1407:
is intended to include all transcriptions not just into English but into other languages. Why not include the Greek transcriptions in the article as the earliest transcriptions from which Yahweh was derived. My goal is to put all information about transcriptions of any sort in the
2380:
Unfortunately I do not have time to offer a studied reply to your request (of which side). I was not trying to enter a fray. My comments were intended only to offer a brief statement of fact from the Watchtower perspective, just in case that is/was somehow party to a sticking
160:
Because this type of format allows people to change info obviously those opposed to the use of Jehovah's name will take advantage of the oppurtunity to erase all mention of this name. But for all who will erase there will always be someone to write. It can work both ways.
1536:
However some Bible Believing Protestant Christians refuse to accept the scholarly consensus that Jehovah does not have the actual vowel points of God’s name, they sincerely believe that the scholars are mistaken, and they continue to honor God by using the name
1954:
It is quite possible that both Knowledge:Yahweh and Knowledge:Tetragrammaton could continue to exist basically as they are today, and that possibly Yahweh and Tetragrammaton might be merged. It was not too long ago some users sought for that merger to take
1573:
Are you therefore asserting that it is folly to try and park all the "transcription issues" in a separate article because these issues are at the very core of whether to use "Jehovah" rather than "Yahweh"? That we can't have a brief summary of the issues in
1597:
Also, can you explain in a nutshell why one would wish for the ability to have a separate article about Jehovah that fits the JW point of view? What is different about Jehovah for them that is not true for other Christians who prefer the name Jehovah over
2922: = Yod + patah; resh + sheva ; dalet + dagesh forte + tsere; nun. Probably why you don't have an actual source for your statement: your statement is factually incorrect :) The following is quite a basic site, but it will assist you in your understanding:
1885:
Also, can you explain in a nutshell why one would wish for the ability to have a separate article about Jehovah that fits the JW point of view? What is different about Jehovah for them that is not true for other Christians who prefer the name Jehovah over
2071:
I have nothing against "thoroughness". I do think that a good encyclopedia should present information at a level aimed at the "average reader" with additional detail for the reader with greater sophistication and interest. I do not think that the
2047:
I’m glad you agree it is speculative to suggest what the average reader cares about deeply or does not care about deeply. Frankly, for encyclopedic content it should be assumed that readers interested in a particular subject desire an objective and
2450:
I still don't understand the nature of the controversy between JWs and KJVO Christians regarding the Jehovah article. Presumably they both agree that the use of the name Jehovah is the appropriate name for God. What is it that they disagree about?
1700:. The transcription issues are vaguely interesting but not relevant to my understanding of God. What's interesting from an encyclopedic perspective is that different groups of Christians do care about these names and I think the articles on
435:; there appear to have been a confused series of page moves and I don't know where the successor (if any) to the original article is now to be found. But this is clear: for the large majority of the time since then, this has been a redirect.
103:
Why is this article part of the JW Project? No doubt they have an interest in the subject, but it's about the name of God in the Bible, which is not owned by them. Unless they really are the only ones who support using this form of the name?
2633:, but right now they will see on top a dab link to take care of other literal uses. If not explained or linked sufficiently in the article itself, maybe one could add a second note such as "For other renderings of the name of the deity, see
2242:
I suspect the hang up stems from aggressive editing by honest individuals untrained in objective research and presentation, which leads to honest but unlearned presentation and dispute. (Not talking about you or other recent editors on this
2156:
Years of history of the Article:Jehovah appears to have been deleted, but when the history existed, it was obvious that any attempt to write an article on Jehovah was almost impossible. Somebody was always adding a revert to some other
2113:
As for Jehovah’s Witnesses and Yahweh versus Jehovah, for whatever it’s worth, though the Watchtower organization asserts Jehovah is the best known English rendering it nevertheless admits Yahweh is actually favored by most Hebrew
1335:
Sorting out the Jehovah matter and the Yahweh matter each onto its own file, and then seeing how far each could be sorted and information duplications removed, would seem to be needed to be done first, before putting them into
1532:
and I think that the Article Yahweh has done an excellent job of presenting the evidence that scholars are using to state more or less dogmatically that the vowel points of Jehovah are not the actual vowel points of God’s
1999:
correct vowel points. Further more the Old Testament that Jehovah‘s Witnesses translate the name Jehovah from, only preserves the spelling (Y)Jehovah about 44 times out of the 6823 times that the Tetragrammaton is found.
1877:
The following questions are not meant to be rhetorical or argumentative but are truly meant in the spirit of wanting to understand your points without my having to read all the previous discussion on all the relevant
1559:
The following questions are not meant to be rhetorical or argumentative but are truly meant in the spirit of wanting to understand your points without my having to read all the previous discussion on all the relevant
2565:
This last at least has some rational consideration behind it. I got the impression your previous two were done for the sake of having been the last one to alter the page. Your first post-merge edit was borderline
1935:
I am open to the idea of there being articles at Jehovah and Yahweh which discuss briefly the history of how that form of the name came to be differentiated from other transcriptions and who uses that particular
1452:
I am open to the idea of there being articles at Jehovah and Yahweh which discuss briefly the history of how that form of the name came to be differentiated from other transcriptions and who uses that particular
1984:
which left Jehovah‘s Witnesses very unhappy, because every attempt they made to create a Knowledge Article:Jehovah ended up being reverted to Knowledge:Tetragrammaton, where they were not allowed to post their
372:
I think I agree and, if we can agree on this, the solution is to merge the two articles. The problem would be to choose which article to keep and which to make the redirect. The third article in this mix is
181:
Verbose heading names such as "Modern scholars believe that Jehovah is a hybrid name" are not encyclopedic. Article needs a lot of rewriting. I don't have time to overhaul at the moment, but someone should.--
2555:. If above discussion results in a consensus on some unification, this may be revisited, but for the moment I would ask all not to not unilaterally anticipate any conclusion on the dab pages. Thanks! --
1514:
Is it possible to create a single Article:Jehovah that could be sectioned off in such a way that Jehovah’s Witnesses and Bible Believing Protestant Christians could work together on the same article,
1968:
If separate Jehovah articles existed, the Jehovah sections in Knowledge:Yahweh and Knowledge:Tetragrammaton could possibly both be reduced, with directs to the potentially 2 new Jehovah articles.
2750:
2543:
other. For once, there are right now two different wikipedia articles for Jehova and Yahweh, but more importantly becuse the dab pages are mostly interesting for their other uses (besides the
2200:
Hopefully, almost immediately the "Jehovah" sections of the articles "Yahweh" and "Tetragrammaton" could be minimized, and yet the previous information would still be accessable on Knowledge.
2025:
Bible Believing Protestant Christians and Jehovah’s Witnesses do not see eye-to-eye concerning the underlying Hebrew vocalization of the Tetragrammaton, from which Jehovah has been derived.
2803:
It's not my own research it's a word in the dictionary. Yarden starts with a 'Y' and the vowel 'Ah' the article states the rules of Hebrew grammar don't allow for a word that starts with a
1197:
Anthony, thank you for your efforts on these articles. Please do not take the following as an attack on those efforts but rather as an effort to achive some clarity in this muddled mess.
1027:
times each day the name Jehovah is being spoken by people worshipping a God whom they know as Jehovah. are these also true of the names Yahweh (a form like Jehovah) and Tetragrammaton?
1744:
The history of the God Yahweh / Yahu / etc and His Name from pre-Judaic times and among Jews, excepting the linguistic results of contact with people who use Greek or Roman alphabets.
2264:
So do you support Seeker02421's solution, my solution or Anthony Appleyard's solution (which he is implementing as we speak but without a clear exposition here on this Talk Page).
616:
It appears I may have jumped the gun in my revert, IMO however I am concerned about the need to have an article titled "Jehovah". This is a very well known english spelling of the
603:
Unless Iaoue is included in the merge - and it does seem a good self-contained article at the moment - then I do not see merit in holding just Jehovah and Yahweh in one article. -
522:"Knowledge Article:Jehovah has been created by persons whose primary interest is in wanting to write a positive Article on the name Jehovah", according to one of those very people.
1035:, though it means God. Jehovah is an anglicised pronunciation of the Divine name meaning "He Causes to Become". It needs to be a stand alone article, at least out of respect.
1981:
I am not a Jehovah’s Witness but, there was a time when considerable Jehovah’s Witness input could be found on Knowledge:Tetragrammaton. Almost all of that input was purged,
151:
Where is the nice very articulate article information that was here a few months ago? Has all that info been erased? I suspect some vandalism based on POV is going on here.
278:. It is my impression that the Knowledge Article:Jehovah has been created by persons whose primary interest is in wanting to write a positive Article on the name Jehovah,
2876:
book or article (from a reliable publisher; self-published books/articles are frowned upon in this area) which uses yarden, mentions hataf-patah, and how that relates to
1315:. First, why "Hebrew Divine Name" instead of "Tetragrammaton" and why only "Greek transcriptions" instead of including all transcriptions including Yahweh and Jehovah?
1299:
should have stand-alone articles as they are both transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton and we don't need three separate articles about three names for the same concept.
2868:
in relation to the pronunciation of Yahweh in the Yarden entry? No, no it doesn't. Therefore you cannot use it as an example of your statement. I was not objecting to
1708:
should spend more effort explaining how the issue of naming arose and less time on the technical aspects of the transcriptions. In essence, the reader of the current
1529:
I think that the Article Yahweh has done an excellent job of presenting the evidence that scholars are using to make the case that God’s name may actually be “Yahweh”,
453:
is the fork". Let's figure out how many articles we need and then decide which titles to use as article titles and which to use as redirects. It seems obvious that
2173:
exists, which seems to indicate that Jehovah_2 or Jehovah_3 could also be created. However maybe something like Jehovah_JW and Jehovah_KJV might be more informative.
2660:
1668:
1645:
1629:
1371:
1312:
1166:
873:
812:
779:
766:
732:
213: occurs 6518 times in the Masoretic Text. In the beginning of the 17th century scholars had rose up to question whether or not the vowel points found in the
2698:
would be the better target. It is neutral, and also acceptable to Jews. The discussion about the Name can be moved there (from both Jehovah and Yahweh). Then
2330:
Re Yahu- theophoric names, I have just discovered (but not done anything about) serious content forking between the above theophoric name matter and the page
992:
and especially not a discussion of linguistic issues surrounding the transcription of the Tetragrammaton. For this reason, a better candidate is actually
2012:
In the case of the King James Bible, the Old Testament is translated from a Masoretic Text that preserved (Y)Jehovah 6518 times AND (Y)Jehovih 305 times.
1776:
article is highly likely to lose the average reader because it leads with the section on "The Name". I understand that there is a deep controversy over
1352:
would thereby become too big and need splitting: in that case the wordier sub-topics may have to stay in their own files. (I had that when I was editing
2237:
Given that Jehovah and Yahweh represent different conclusions of the same subject it is silly, to me, that either should be addressed without the other.
284:
It is my impression that the editors of the Knowledge Article:Yahweh are not primarilly interested in writing a positive article on the name "Jehovah",
1148:
What happens to the text about events AD when qere-vowel-pointed forms of Hebrew y-h-w-h were misread by European Christians, thus producing the form "
934:
etc. Right now all these articles are a mish-mash of linguistic and semantic content with heavy duplication and content forking all over the place.
2294:
article. Presumably they both agree that the use of the name Jehovah is the appropriate name for God. What is it that they disagree about?
1785:
why it is preferable to "Yahweh" and I doubt many would care. (I admit this is pure speculation on my part and am willing to be corrected.)
2391:
and foremost a scholarly question and afterward a religious issue. This is true from lexicographic, historical and theological perspectives.
1672:
1664:
1649:
1625:
1404:
865:
857:
828:
783:
701:
2826:
2086:
1798:
1583:
1409:
977:
960:
877:
861:
838:
787:
697:
653:
638:
425:
is the main article; it has the same information found here and more. (Am I mistaken in the impression that the current version carefully
1412:
article and then reserve other article titles for discussions about the nature and history of God. Whether these discussions happen in
2811:
the vowel 'Ah' at the beginning of the word. That is factually incorrect like in the word Yarden. The book I provided was a dictionary.
2776:
2754:
568:. The ideal would be one article but there is probably too much content, in which case my next best proposal would be one article on
221: were the actual vowel points of God's name and in return other scholars rose up to defend the accuracy of the vowel points found in
126:
1240:
The following is based on a review of the discussions here on this Talk Page and the edit summaries in the edit history of this page.
696:
For technical reasons regarding preservation of edit history, that is currently a redirect to Tetragrammaton. The original text of
2275:
articles more or less as is with the de-forking of the theophoric discussions that he has just finished implementing (see below).
2769:
are the the screenshots of digital scanned scrolls from all over the world. From Allepo codex, Cairo Codex and Leningrad Codex.
2465:
Jehovah's Witnesses are considered to be a non-Christian cult, by a large proportion of Protestant Christians, including myself.
320:
It is my opinion that any article on Jehovah should deal with the obvious controversy that exists concerning the vowel points of
1816:
article. The transcription-wonks have taken over this corner of Knowledge and it is time for the "rest of us" to take it back.
1377:
2400:
At the moment I do not have the time to engage this subject with the thoroughness it deserves for an encyclopedic presentation.
1808:
article is even worse. It seems to talk only about the transcription issues. If any Christian, especially a JW, came to the
1628:, and it seems to omit some of the Jehovah matter, and some of the matter about the pre-Judaic prehistory of Yahweh. Now that
140:
This article has be erroneously redirected to Tetragrammaton. I beseech some adminstrator out there to revert it back ASAP.
569:
2426:, but by now has life of its own and is accepted by millions of Christians who use it in hymns and prayers as a name of
2319:. That cured major content forking and much repeated text. Feel free to revert in both files if you disagree with this.
993:
478:
What I think we need to understand now is whether we need one article, two articles or three. Right now we have three
1055:
417:
Cut and pasted sections # 1 through sections # 4 from the Knowledge Article:Yahweh into this Knowledge Article:Jehovah
819:(considering original source info rather than who wrote what about it in recent centuries), and the rest merged into
2462:
the KJV translators did not translate (Y)Jehovah as Jehovah 6518 times. This can result in some heated discussions.
328: are the actual vowel points of God's name. In my opinion, their views should be allowed to be posted, as long as
1812:
article, he would expect a description of the God that "Jehovah" names. That description is sorely lacking in the
1421:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1288:
1243:
The current situation seems to be that Ice9Tea, Seeker02421, Fayenatic london and presumably yourself believe that
1216:
997:
607:
38:
2923:
360:
1200:
I think you are jumping the gun and presuming a resolution to the edit war over the redirect of this article to
2822:
2535:
1118:
I think it would be better to consolidate first into one article about God as depicted in the Old Testament at
532:
2930:
2893:
2780:
2539:
1667:
because I'm trying to gauge how much support there is for my proposed framework. Would you support merging
1357:
1318:
Thus your position represents a plurality (4/9) but not a majority and certainly not the consensus position.
130:
2735:
2680:
2516:
2490:
2431:
2359:
2320:
1764:
1653:
1387:
1361:
1187:
1170:
1155:
1106:
910:
757:
76:
71:
66:
2547:) and the two are different search terms: It is not evry leilely that someone typing Yahweh searches for
1126:
before deciding if any subtopics have enough content to warrant forking from the consolidated articles.
152:
143:
672:
645:
621:
604:
432:
Second, check the article history. There appears to have been a history before the first revision saved
2714:
2814:
2772:
2290:
I still don't understand the nature of the controversy between JWs and KJVO Christians regarding the
1384:
why only "Greek transcriptions" instead of including all transcriptions including Yahweh and Jehovah?
1237:
I think we should discuss the merits of your position before you invest a lot of time in these edits.
122:
2552:
206:
89:
This page has been provided so that Knowledge editors may comment on the Knowledge Article:Jehovah.
2839:
2818:
2734:
Point taken, but it is 11.40 pm here in England. I will have to look at the matter in the morning.
2410:
2249:
2120:
2058:
1220:
765:
The strategy seems to be to separate linguistic issues from semantic content. Anthony has created
715:
597:
2571:
But this is still highly ill-considered, because of the redirects. How do you know someone typing
2052:
presentation on that particular subject. Otherwise what is the point of encyclopedic presentation?
2926:
2889:
2798:
1540:
And Jehovah’s Witnesses have their own particular issues to defend, concerning the name “Jehovah“
1424:
is a secondary question to the question of where the discussions of linguistic issues should go.
2844:- You appear to not be understanding what I'm referring to when I remove your edits. Firstly,
2724:
2580:
2298:
2279:
2187:
like Gerard Gertoux that have written books defending the pronunciation "Yehowah" / "Jehovah".
2137:
2103:
1820:
1723:
1610:
1428:
1325:
1178:
I hereby request permission from the group to have a go at moving Jehovah-related matter from
1010:
885:
799:
705:
688:
508:
We need two articles, which should be arranged so as to make the disambiguation at the top of
496:
398:
262:
236:
2481:
Re queries above: e.g. getting rid of content-forking in text about theophoric names between
1465:
article on Jehovah would satisfy those editors that want an article on Jehovah to be written,
2611:
2472:
2213:
2033:
1543:
972:
If they are to be redirects, to what should they re-direct to? Obvious candidates would be
345:
304:
296:
90:
2864:." Where is any of this mentioned in the BDB entry? Does it say "hataf-patah"? Does it say
2766:
2676:
2672:
2501:
2331:
2308:
1040:
1036:
457:
is a more comprehensive article than this one is but that could mean that we should merge
980:. Both proposals make sense but are emotionally unsatisfying because people who look up
2707:
2695:
2656:
2634:
2625:
2544:
1274:
1123:
989:
973:
956:
869:
853:
842:
832:
751:
681:
676:
649:
617:
589:
585:
553:
549:
509:
487:
470:
378:
374:
2765:
denominations so are dont have a impartial view or voice in this. In this youtubelink
324:. However there are scholars that can be quoted who believe that the vowel points of
2638:
2556:
671:
I'm not sure where the discussion of the God of Judaism and Christianity should go.
629:
364:
182:
2530:
It seems that this discussion has spilled over to the related disambiguation pages.
922:
The key question is where to place the semantic discussion of what the god named by
235:
Why is this in the lead? Seems like it belongs in the main body of the article. --
2851:
394:
254:
165:
47:
17:
2872:, but rather your statement about the usage of the vowel points. Again you need a
2749:
The letter J first appeared in the 1629 1st Revision Cambridge King James Bible.
2085:
I am proposing that the more detailed information be moved to a separate article
261:. Would each side please explain the arguments for and against the redirect? --
2710:. They need not be redirects: there will be other material under these headings.
2597:
2531:
1127:
652:
article was "transcription" not "pronounciation" so I created an article titled
536:
436:
390:
250:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2745:
The letter J first appeared in the 1629 1st Revision Cambridge King James Bible
2423:
1403:
Yes, but my point is that they are all transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton.
740:
1344:
or wherever they are put. There is also a risk that if everything was put in
2548:
2170:
746:
I found (but so far I have done nothing about) much content-forking between
2934:
2897:
2830:
2784:
2758:
2738:
2727:
2717:
2683:
2641:
2600:
2559:
2519:
2493:
2475:
2434:
2413:
2362:
2323:
2301:
2282:
2252:
2216:
2140:
2123:
2106:
2061:
2036:
1823:
1767:
1726:
1656:
1613:
1546:
1431:
1390:
1364:
1328:
1190:
1173:
1158:
1130:
1109:
1043:
1013:
913:
888:
802:
760:
708:
691:
632:
610:
596:
of God as taught by each faith which claims to be based on the Bible, e.g.
539:
499:
439:
401:
367:
348:
307:
299:
265:
239:
185:
168:
155:
146:
134:
93:
1751:
The history of "Jehovah" as an established European Christian name of God.
1688:
I have to admit my personal bias. I don't much care whether we call God
1234:
should each continue on as stand-alone articles rather than as redirects.
620:. If we need a disambig page then all five of the articles mentioned by
535:, or that it should be copied onto this page and made a redirect here.
2703:
2668:
2630:
2592:
2588:
2510:
2486:
2469:
wait for the final decision by the Knowledge Moderators involved here.
2353:
2316:
2291:
2268:
2090:
2073:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1781:
1738:
1713:
1705:
1697:
1676:
1641:
1575:
1413:
1353:
1303:
1292:
1280:
1266:
1255:
1244:
1231:
1208:
1183:
1149:
1089:
1063:
985:
952:
931:
902:
791:
657:
577:
565:
483:
466:
386:
852:
Well, yes. I had tried to separate out the linguistic discussions in
624:
should be included on that page. Perhaps a better solution might be a
2699:
2691:
2664:
2584:
2576:
2482:
2349:
2346:
2343:
2340:
2312:
2272:
2094:
2077:
1789:
1777:
1773:
1734:
1709:
1701:
1693:
1680:
1637:
1633:
1579:
1490:
to limit the editors to only those who wanted to write about Jehovah.
1417:
1307:
1296:
1284:
1270:
1259:
1248:
1227:
1212:
1201:
1179:
1140:
1119:
1100:
1096:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1059:
981:
948:
927:
898:
881:
820:
816:
795:
747:
661:
581:
557:
479:
462:
458:
454:
422:
382:
275:
258:
214:
1095:
Also the statement that the Hebrew leters YHWH carry the vowels for
2089:
with a 2-3 paragraph summary aimed at the "average reader" kept in
2572:
1755:
1207:
You are also presuming a decision regarding my proposal that both
1028:
790:
and then merge in any other discussions of linguistic issues from
724:
665:
573:
561:
2723:
I agree... this is what I've been trying to say for some time. --
2339:
It also may be (but I have done nothing about) that the sections
1478:
any single Article on Jehovah is probably likely to be subject to
229: are the actual vowel points of God's name continues even today.
1793:
944:
923:
736:
728:
2857:
2427:
1772:
At the risk of repeating myself, the problem here is that the
1754:
Someone above mentioned "Abrahamic religions", but presumably
1689:
1356:: it got bigger and bigger, and in the end I had to split off
1032:
988:
are going to want a discussion of God not a discussion of the
111:
pronunciation is such an issue? Can you provide an example of
25:
2848:
state this: "However this is not the case in many words like
1717:
pointer to a more technical article on the linguistic issues.
1502:
one that would satisfy Bible Believing Protestant Christians,
1917:
Earlier I was basically responding to your previous comment:
1360:
and pages for each of some nations' frogman organizations.)
680:
look for the description of the Judaic and Christian God in
286:
while adhering to Knowledge's "Neutral point of view" rules.
280:
while adhering to Knowledge's "Neutral point of view" rules.
811:
After re-examination of these pages, it seems that much of
225:. The controversy over whether or not the vowel points of
1882:
link to the Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton article?
1846:
Please don't throw out the baby with the dirty washwater.
588:
to concentrate on the meaning of the word, incorporating
490:. Do we need three or can we merge some or all of these?
450:
446:
1675:
followed by merging transcription-related material from
943:
One question that also needs to be addressed is whether
718:
for a list of various Yahweh-related pages that I found.
2767:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA3VKpVP17U&t=1708s
2624:
the same topic. As far as I remember at that time also
1517:
without getting into endless edit wars with each other?
1139:
I have made a small addition to the end of the section
648:'s suggestion. I discovered that the word used in the
433:
410:
1673:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1665:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1650:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1626:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1405:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
868:, then obviously those sections would be removed from
866:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
858:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
829:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
784:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
702:
User:Richardshusr/Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
592:. Separate articles are required in any case for the
531:
BTW, I've come to think this page should redirect to
1092:
and merged in in time order of the topics discussed.
897:
There also seems to be some content forking between
409:
Most of the content now in the article was added in
2690:A lot of good work. But right now all redirects to
389:to that article. I would really like to hear from
1741:, and it seems that there are these topics here:-
1056:User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Recent edits to Yahweh
675:suggests that it should go into the now shortened
548:There are not three articles currently, but five:
115:name in the Bible that English-speakers pronounce
2591:? For that matter, how do we know someone typing
2422:It seems that the name "Jehovah" originated as a
1302:I am open to the idea of there being articles at
2902:Perhaps I should also point out the vowel below
656:whose scope is intended to be the discussion of
107:Another thing, can anyone explain to me why the
2350:Yahweh#Controversy in the 16th and 17th century
1636:at the same time as moving Jehovah matter from
1321:What do we need to do to form a consensus here?
1086:Yahweh#Controversy in the 16th and 17th century
955:, etc. have any reason to exist independent of
2661:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
2341:Yahweh#Early use of forms similar to "Jehovah"
1669:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
1646:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
1630:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
1372:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
1313:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
1167:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
1074:Yahweh#Early use of forms similar to "Jehovah"
874:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
813:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
780:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
767:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
733:Greek transcriptions of the Hebrew Divine Name
668:from the perspective of transcription only.
815:can be deleted as a wordy repeat of parts of
628:tag? Or a see alos section at the beginning.
429:linking there? Why, if not for POV reasons?)
8:
2509:I have corrected some links at the start of
2307:I have ventured to merge the "evidence from
363:; this is a rather clear example of that. --
1508:one that would satisfy Jehovah’s Witnesses?
1473:without careful structuring of the sections
1165:I have tidied up much duplicated matter in
1058:: I started to move the Jehovah stuff from
831:seems to be the same or nearly the same as
164:I have brought back the article "Jehovah"
99:Why is this article part of the JW Project?
2770:
1526:Concerning the Jehovah/Yahweh controversy,
1378:Greek transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1251:should both exist as stand-alone articles.
864:with the initial content being taken from
2267:I think Anthony intends that we keep the
1663:I have avoided doing any further work on
1499:Could two articles on Jehovah be created,
413:by Seeker02421. The actual edit summary:
330:Knowledge's "Neutral point of view" rules
2504:. Feel free to revert it if you want to.
1072:Anyway: it looks like that the sections
644:I was bold and implemented a variant of
445:I don't think that it is useful to say "
2675:among these pages and between them and
2258:(edit conflict with Anthony Appleyard)
1632:is fairly short, I could merge it into
1254:A.J.A., Whpq and Jpgordon believe that
2751:2601:589:4801:5660:483E:B81B:28E5:8973
735:, but put the non-linguistic parts of
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2856:יַרְדֵּן which begin with the letter
2511:Jehovah#"Yahweh" and theophoric names
7:
2087:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1799:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1584:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
1410:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
978:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
961:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
878:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
862:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
839:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
788:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
698:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
654:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
639:Transcriptions of the Tetragrammaton
2097:. Do you object to this framework?
872:. The next step would be to merge
570:Pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton
249:There has been an edit war between
195:The lead includes the following...
85:This page has been provided so that
2344:Yahweh#Use of "Jehovah" in English
1338:God in Abrahamic religions#Jehovah
1078:Yahweh#Use of "Jehovah" in English
24:
2884:. Without it, this is classed as
1582:and a "main article" link to the
1342:God in Abrahamic religions#Yahweh
1122:and one about the name itself at
377:. We could merge all three into
1291:. I do not believe that either
1031:by the way does not redirect to
963:or if they should be re-directs.
584:. That would leave room for the
29:
2910:is a patah, not a hataf-patah:
2706:can refer to the discussion in
1376:: OK OK, I could rename it was
996:which I am trying to rename to
880:and delete those sections from
207:the Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon
205: c. 6823", the editors of the
2551:and someone typing Jehova for
1644:. So far I see no sign of the
1:
2785:13:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
2610:understanding in the line of
1265:Johanneum believes that both
135:15:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
2935:18:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
2898:17:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
2831:12:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
994:Abrahamic conceptions of God
397:first before proceeding. --
2953:
1422:God in Abrahamic religions
1350:God in Abrahamic religions
1346:God in Abrahamic religions
1289:God in Abrahamic religions
1226:Presumably you think that
1217:God in Abrahamic religions
998:God in Abrahamic religions
274:the name Yahweh can go to
186:14:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
169:23:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
2919:
2915:
2911:
2671:. I have cleared up much
1788:What's important is that
860:. If we agree to create
361:Knowledge:Content forking
325:
321:
226:
222:
218:
210:
202:
156:21:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
147:21:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
119:like the ancient Hebrews?
94:13:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
2759:22:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
2536:Jehovah (disambiguation)
1758:can be left out of this.
1484:even if it was possible,
1103:, occurs more than once.
1039:01:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
778:I propose that we merge
533:Jehovah (disambiguation)
449:is the main article and
2914: is the hataf-patah ;
2739:22:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2728:22:43, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2718:22:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2684:11:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2642:22:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2601:18:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2560:07:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
2540:Yahweh (disambiguation)
2520:09:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
2494:22:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2476:21:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2435:20:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2414:20:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2363:20:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2324:19:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2302:19:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2283:19:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2253:19:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2217:19:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2141:19:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2124:18:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2107:19:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2062:18:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
2037:18:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1824:18:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1768:17:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1733:I have looked again at
1727:17:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1657:17:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1614:17:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1547:17:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1432:17:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1391:16:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1365:16:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1358:Anti-frogman techniques
1329:12:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1191:11:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1174:10:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1159:05:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1131:05:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1110:05:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1067:the matter longer here.
1044:01:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
1014:17:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
914:17:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
889:17:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
803:15:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
761:12:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
709:15:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
692:23:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
633:22:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
611:21:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
540:16:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
500:15:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
440:15:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
402:14:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
368:13:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
349:11:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
308:10:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
300:10:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
266:05:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
240:05:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
2924:Hebrew Grammar Lesson
1859:You previously wrote:
841:now is a redirect to
673:User:Fayenatic london
646:User:Fayenatic london
626:were you looking for]
421:This is the fork and
257:over the redirect to
42:of past discussions.
2526:Disambiguation pages
1287:should re-direct to
1279:I believe that both
1258:should re-direct to
572:which would combine
2352:would be better in
2261:To Marvin Shilmer,
1273:should redirect to
1088:should be moved to
716:Talk:Tetragrammaton
598:God in Christianity
201:Under the heading "
381:and redirect both
245:Redirect to Yahweh
2918: is the patah =
2886:original research
2817:comment added by
2787:
2775:comment added by
2736:Anthony Appleyard
2681:Anthony Appleyard
2581:Transcribing JHVH
2517:Anthony Appleyard
2491:Anthony Appleyard
2432:Anthony Appleyard
2360:Anthony Appleyard
2321:Anthony Appleyard
2232:Ah. I understand.
2080:articles do that.
1765:Anthony Appleyard
1654:Anthony Appleyard
1624:I have looked at
1461:In my opinion no
1388:Anthony Appleyard
1362:Anthony Appleyard
1215:be redirected to
1188:Anthony Appleyard
1171:Anthony Appleyard
1156:Anthony Appleyard
1107:Anthony Appleyard
1099:and occasionally
911:Anthony Appleyard
758:Anthony Appleyard
461:into this one or
137:
125:comment added by
82:
81:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2944:
2921:
2917:
2913:
2843:
2833:
2807:, 'Y' to have a
2802:
2447:To Seeker02421,
2309:theophoric names
2287:To Seeker02421,
1186:and vice-versa.
700:can be found in
622:Fayenatic london
605:Fayenatic london
327:
323:
228:
224:
220:
212:
204:
120:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2952:
2951:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2837:
2812:
2796:
2794:
2747:
2677:Theophoric name
2673:content forking
2652:
2528:
2502:Theophoric name
2440:Richard wrote:
2332:Theophoric name
1471:In my opinion,
642:
332:are adhered to.
247:
193:
179:
101:
87:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2950:
2948:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2840:Shandor Newman
2819:Shandor Newman
2793:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2746:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2731:
2730:
2712:
2711:
2708:Tetragrammaton
2696:Tetragrammaton
2687:
2686:
2657:Tetragrammaton
2655:I have merged
2651:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2635:tetragrammaton
2626:tetragrammaton
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2604:
2603:
2568:
2567:
2553:Prophet Yahweh
2545:tetragrammaton
2527:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2514:
2506:
2505:
2500:I have tidied
2497:
2496:
2452:
2446:
2438:
2437:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2411:Marvin Shilmer
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2366:
2365:
2357:
2336:
2335:
2327:
2326:
2311:" matter from
2256:
2255:
2250:Marvin Shilmer
2245:
2244:
2239:
2238:
2234:
2233:
2229:
2228:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2129:
2127:
2126:
2121:Marvin Shilmer
2116:
2115:
2110:
2109:
2099:
2098:
2082:
2081:
2067:
2065:
2064:
2059:Marvin Shilmer
2054:
2053:
2044:
2043:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1982:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1937:
1936:transcription.
1933:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1752:
1749:
1745:
1730:
1729:
1719:
1718:
1685:
1684:
1660:
1659:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1541:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1527:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1515:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1503:
1500:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1488:
1485:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1469:
1466:
1459:
1454:
1453:transcription.
1450:
1445:
1444:Richard wrote:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1425:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1381:
1332:
1331:
1322:
1319:
1316:
1300:
1277:
1275:Tetragrammaton
1263:
1252:
1241:
1238:
1235:
1224:
1205:
1198:
1194:
1193:
1176:
1162:
1161:
1153:
1145:
1144:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1124:Tetragrammaton
1113:
1112:
1104:
1093:
1069:
1068:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
990:Tetragrammaton
974:Tetragrammaton
967:
966:
965:
964:
957:Tetragrammaton
938:
937:
936:
935:
917:
916:
907:
906:
894:
893:
892:
891:
870:Tetragrammaton
854:Tetragrammaton
847:
846:
843:Tetragrammaton
836:
833:Tetragrammaton
825:
824:
808:
807:
806:
805:
773:
772:
771:
770:
755:
752:Tetragrammaton
744:
720:
719:
682:Tetragrammaton
677:Tetragrammaton
650:Tetragrammaton
641:
636:
618:Tetragrammaton
614:
613:
601:
590:I am that I am
586:Tetragrammaton
554:I am that I am
550:Tetragrammaton
545:
544:
543:
542:
526:
525:
524:
523:
516:
515:
514:
513:
510:Tetragrammaton
503:
502:
492:
491:
488:Tetragrammaton
475:
474:
471:Tetragrammaton
419:
418:
407:
406:
405:
404:
379:Tetragrammaton
375:Tetragrammaton
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
313:
312:
311:
310:
302:
291:
290:
289:
288:
282:
246:
243:
233:
232:
231:
230:
192:
189:
178:
175:
173:
153:70.178.120.190
144:70.178.120.190
100:
97:
86:
83:
80:
79:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2949:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2927:Stephen Walch
2925:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2900:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2890:Stephen Walch
2887:
2883:
2879:
2875:
2871:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2853:
2847:
2841:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2832:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2810:
2806:
2800:
2799:Stephen Walch
2791:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2768:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2756:
2752:
2744:
2740:
2737:
2733:
2732:
2729:
2726:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2716:
2709:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2693:
2689:
2688:
2685:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2653:
2649:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2627:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2613:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2599:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2579:? Why should
2578:
2574:
2570:
2569:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2561:
2558:
2554:
2550:
2546:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2525:
2521:
2518:
2515:
2512:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2498:
2495:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2463:
2459:
2456:
2448:
2441:
2436:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2420:
2415:
2412:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2364:
2361:
2358:
2355:
2351:
2348:
2345:
2342:
2338:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2328:
2325:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2300:
2295:
2293:
2288:
2285:
2284:
2281:
2276:
2274:
2270:
2265:
2262:
2259:
2254:
2251:
2247:
2246:
2241:
2240:
2236:
2235:
2231:
2230:
2226:
2225:
2218:
2215:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2172:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2155:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2142:
2139:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2125:
2122:
2118:
2117:
2112:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2063:
2060:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2046:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2035:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1983:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1938:
1934:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1822:
1817:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1802:
1800:
1795:
1791:
1786:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1769:
1766:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1728:
1725:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1661:
1658:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1622:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1548:
1545:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1516:
1513:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1460:
1455:
1451:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1433:
1430:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1392:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1375:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1334:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1323:
1320:
1317:
1314:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1239:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:
1221:Tetragrmmaton
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1196:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1141:Yahweh#Cultus
1138:
1137:
1132:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
999:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
970:
969:
968:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
941:
940:
939:
933:
929:
925:
921:
920:
919:
918:
915:
912:
909:
908:
904:
900:
896:
895:
890:
887:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
837:
834:
830:
827:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
809:
804:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
776:
775:
774:
768:
764:
763:
762:
759:
756:
753:
749:
745:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
721:
717:
713:
712:
711:
710:
707:
703:
699:
694:
693:
690:
685:
683:
678:
674:
669:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
640:
637:
635:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
612:
609:
606:
602:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
541:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
527:
520:
519:
518:
517:
511:
507:
506:
505:
504:
501:
498:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
438:
434:
430:
428:
424:
416:
415:
414:
412:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
371:
370:
369:
366:
362:
358:
357:
350:
347:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
331:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
309:
306:
303:
301:
298:
295:
294:
293:
292:
287:
283:
281:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
244:
242:
241:
238:
216:
208:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
190:
188:
187:
184:
176:
174:
171:
170:
167:
162:
158:
157:
154:
149:
148:
145:
141:
138:
136:
132:
128:
124:
118:
114:
110:
105:
98:
96:
95:
92:
84:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2907:
2903:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2849:
2845:
2813:— Preceding
2808:
2804:
2795:
2777:62.195.22.16
2771:— Preceding
2748:
2715:213.84.53.62
2713:
2587:rather than
2529:
2471:
2467:
2464:
2460:
2457:
2449:
2442:
2439:
2296:
2289:
2286:
2277:
2266:
2263:
2260:
2257:
2136:to solve. --
2128:
2066:
2049:
2032:
1818:
1803:
1787:
1771:
1763:
1472:
1462:
1383:
1369:
695:
686:
670:
643:
625:
615:
593:
431:
426:
420:
408:
395:User:Ice9Tea
329:
285:
279:
255:User:Ice9Tea
248:
234:
194:
180:
172:
163:
159:
150:
142:
139:
127:65.94.130.39
116:
112:
108:
106:
102:
88:
60:
43:
37:
18:Talk:Jehovah
2920:יַ-רְ-דֵּ-ן
2862:hataf-patah
2860:and have a
2809:hataf patah
2534:redirected
2473:Seeker02421
2214:Seeker02421
2034:Seeker02421
1544:Seeker02421
391:User:A.J.A.
346:Seeker02421
305:Seeker02421
297:Seeker02421
251:User:A.J.A.
209:write that
121:—Preceding
91:Seeker02421
36:This is an
2566:vandalism.
2424:ghost word
2347:Yahweh#J/Y
1792:came from
1648:matter in
1481:edit wars,
1082:Yahweh#J/Y
1041:Jellofever
1037:Jellofever
741:Samaritans
594:attributes
2874:published
2612:WP:MOSDAB
2549:Jehovah 1
2458:Richard,
2171:Jehovah_1
2114:scholars.
798:, etc. --
723:I merged
411:this edit
217:spelling
77:Archive 4
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
2866:anything
2827:contribs
2815:unsigned
2773:unsigned
2694:, where
2639:Tikiwont
2583:lead to
2557:Tikiwont
2371:Richard,
2243:subject)
2227:Richard,
2050:thorough
2042:Richard,
1904:Richard,
1833:Richard,
1652:so far.
1586:article?
1537:Jehovah.
512:correct.
365:jpgordon
183:Jeffro77
177:Headings
123:unsigned
2882:Jehovah
2725:Richard
2704:Jehovah
2669:Jehovah
2650:Merging
2631:Jehovah
2593:Jehovah
2589:Jehovah
2487:Jehovah
2354:Jehovah
2317:Jehovah
2299:Richard
2292:Jehovah
2280:Richard
2269:Jehovah
2157:aricle.
2153:Richard
2138:Richard
2104:Richard
2091:Jehovah
2074:Jehovah
1886:Yahweh?
1821:Richard
1814:Jehovah
1810:Jehovah
1806:Jehovah
1782:Jehovah
1748:Hebrew.
1739:Jehovah
1724:Richard
1714:Jehovah
1706:Jehovah
1698:Jehovah
1677:Jehovah
1642:Jehovah
1611:Richard
1598:Yahweh?
1576:Jehovah
1429:Richard
1414:Jehovah
1354:Frogman
1326:Richard
1304:Jehovah
1293:Jehovah
1281:Jehovah
1267:Jehovah
1256:Jehovah
1245:Jehovah
1232:Jehovah
1209:Jehovah
1184:Jehovah
1150:Jehovah
1090:Jehovah
1064:Jehovah
1011:Richard
986:Jehovah
953:Jehovah
932:Jehovah
903:Jehovah
886:Richard
800:Richard
792:Jehovah
706:Richard
689:Richard
658:Jehovah
578:Jehovah
566:Jehovah
497:Richard
484:Jehovah
467:Jehovah
399:Richard
387:Jehovah
326:יְהֹוָה
322:יְהֹוָה
263:Richard
237:Richard
227:יְהֹוָה
223:יְהֹוָה
219:יְהֹוָה
211:יְהֹוָה
166:Ice9Tea
117:exactly
39:archive
2908:yarden
2878:Yahweh
2870:yarden
2852:Yarden
2792:Yarden
2700:Yahweh
2692:Yahweh
2665:Yahweh
2598:A.J.A.
2585:Yahweh
2577:Yahweh
2575:wants
2483:Yahweh
2381:point.
2313:Yahweh
2273:Yahweh
2095:Yahweh
2078:Yahweh
1985:views.
1955:place.
1878:pages.
1790:Yahweh
1778:Yahweh
1774:Yahweh
1735:Yahweh
1710:Yahweh
1702:Yahweh
1694:Yahweh
1681:Yahweh
1638:Yahweh
1634:Yahweh
1580:Yahweh
1560:pages.
1418:Yahweh
1308:Yahweh
1297:Yahweh
1285:Yahweh
1271:Yahweh
1260:Yahweh
1249:Yahweh
1228:Yahweh
1213:Yahweh
1202:Yahweh
1180:Yahweh
1128:A.J.A.
1120:Yahweh
1101:Elohim
1097:Adonai
1060:Yahweh
982:Yahweh
976:or to
949:Yahweh
928:Yahweh
899:Yahweh
882:Yahweh
821:Yahweh
817:Yahweh
796:Yahweh
748:Yahweh
704:. --
662:Yahweh
630:George
608:(talk)
582:Yahweh
558:Yahweh
537:A.J.A.
480:Yahweh
463:Yahweh
459:Yahweh
455:Yahweh
437:A.J.A.
427:avoids
423:Yahweh
383:Yahweh
276:Yahweh
259:Yahweh
215:Hebrew
2663:into
2573:Iaoue
2532:A.J.A
2455:: -->
2454:: -->
2453:: -->
2445:: -->
2444:: -->
2443:: -->
1941:: -->
1940:: -->
1939:: -->
1932:: -->
1931:: -->
1930:: -->
1891:: -->
1890:: -->
1889:: -->
1874:: -->
1873:: -->
1872:: -->
1756:Allah
1671:into
1533:name.
1463:brief
1458:: -->
1457:: -->
1456:: -->
1449:: -->
1448:: -->
1447:: -->
1029:Allah
876:into
856:into
786:into
731:into
725:Iaoue
666:Iaoue
574:Iaoue
562:Iaoue
469:into
109:exact
16:<
2931:talk
2894:talk
2823:talk
2781:talk
2755:talk
2702:and
2667:and
2659:and
2485:and
2271:and
2093:and
2076:and
1804:The
1801:.
1794:YHWH
1780:and
1737:and
1712:and
1704:and
1679:and
1578:and
1370:Why
1340:and
1306:and
1283:and
1269:and
1247:and
1230:and
1211:and
959:and
945:YHWH
924:YHWH
901:and
884:. --
782:and
750:and
737:Iabe
729:Iabe
727:and
714:See
664:and
580:and
564:and
486:and
465:AND
393:and
385:and
359:See
253:and
203:יהוה
191:Lead
131:talk
2906:in
2904:yod
2880:or
2858:Yod
2846:you
2805:yod
2538:to
2428:God
2409:--
2315:to
2248:--
2119:--
2057:--
1696:or
1690:God
1640:to
1505:and
1468:and
1420:or
1311:on
1295:or
1219:or
1182:to
1062:to
1054:Re
1033:God
984:or
739:in
113:any
2933:)
2916:יַ
2912:יֲ
2896:)
2888:.
2829:)
2825:•
2783:)
2757:)
2679:.
2614:).
2430:.
2297:--
2278:--
2102:--
1819:--
1722:--
1692:,
1609:--
1511:or
1427:--
1416:,
1348:,
1324:--
1169:.
1152:"?
1084:,
1080:,
1076:,
1009:--
951:,
947:,
930:,
926:,
794:,
687:--
684:.
660:,
576:,
560:,
556:,
552:,
495:--
482:,
133:)
2929:(
2892:(
2854:’
2850:’
2842::
2838:@
2821:(
2801::
2797:@
2779:(
2753:(
2513:.
2356:.
2334:.
1683:?
1487:,
1475:,
1380:.
1374:?
1262:.
1223:.
1204:.
1143:.
1000:.
905:.
845:.
835:.
823:.
769:.
754:.
743:.
600:.
473:.
451:Y
447:X
129:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.