284:"Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes; however, physical geographic articles – for example, mountains, valleys, rivers, lakes, and swamps – should not. Where a single article covers both human and physical geographic subjects (e.g. Manhattan), or where the status of the territory is subject to a political dispute, the consensus of editors at that article will determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not."
74:
53:
84:
180:
162:
22:
190:
306:
also use flags in their infoboxes. As a settlement with no defined area or boundaries, Jericho is most certainly a human geographic feature; it clearly neither covers both human and physical geographic subjects nor is it a subject of a political dispute. Feel free to make your case that it should be
321:
Let us know if you have any response to the fact that this article is not one that "covers both human and physical geography". There is no consensus supporting removal. If you won't be seeking a consensus elsewhere to support your interpretation, I will be happy to restore the deleted content after
290:-- the example provided for a place that has the joint characteristics of human and physical geography -- has flags for the US, New York State and New York City, and Manhattan meets the good article standard. Featured articles for
374:
I can go either way on this, but falling to the lowest standard used by municipal articles in other states seems to be a rather weak argument for removing the flags; nor does
Magnolia677 help his cause by misrepresenting
258:
I have again removed the flag from the infobox. Because this article covers both human and physical geography, I am seeking a consensus of editors to determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not, per
438:
379:
and incorrectly describing
Jericho as an article that "covers both human and physical geography". Who started adding these flags in New Jersey in the first place?
428:
144:
134:
433:
423:
443:
110:
106:
220:
97:
58:
393:
I think you started to add them? Then I did after seeing them, but then had a second opinion. Many are still left without them.
340:
states that they can be distracting to the reader, which I agree with. Several places in surrounding states, such as PA (
352:), but with the exception of big cities, don't use them and our region should remain consistent with the others, stated
203:
167:
33:
21:
353:
341:
268:
39:
402:
388:
369:
331:
316:
272:
349:
219:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
384:
327:
312:
398:
365:
345:
89:
264:
216:
376:
337:
279:
260:
336:
Honestly I believe the flags cause some clutter, IMO. The top part of that section of
417:
380:
323:
308:
299:
195:
394:
361:
73:
52:
179:
161:
185:
102:
79:
287:
303:
295:
291:
307:
removed, just let me know where you are seeking this consensus.
212:
208:
15:
207:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
101:, an effort to create, expand, and improve
156:
47:
19:
158:
49:
439:Stub-Class WikiProject Cities articles
7:
201:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
429:Low-importance New Jersey articles
14:
278:To quote the relevant text from
188:
178:
160:
119:Knowledge:WikiProject New Jersey
82:
72:
51:
20:
434:WikiProject New Jersey articles
139:This article has been rated as
122:Template:WikiProject New Jersey
424:Stub-Class New Jersey articles
1:
317:22:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
273:21:17, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
223:and see a list of open tasks.
109:standard. Please join in the
444:All WikiProject Cities pages
229:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities
403:21:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
389:20:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
370:19:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
332:18:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
235:WikiProject Cities articles
232:Template:WikiProject Cities
460:
145:project's importance scale
173:
138:
107:Knowledge feature-quality
67:
46:
95:This article is part of
360:in non-major cities.
356:. I think they should
98:WikiProject New Jersey
28:This article is rated
342:Indiana, Pennsylvania
105:–related articles to
350:Hempstead, New York
254:Flag use in infobox
125:New Jersey articles
344:for example), DE (
215:and various other
204:WikiProject Cities
34:content assessment
346:Milford, Delaware
251:
250:
247:
246:
243:
242:
155:
154:
151:
150:
90:New Jersey portal
451:
286:The article for
237:
236:
233:
230:
227:
198:
193:
192:
191:
182:
175:
174:
164:
157:
127:
126:
123:
120:
117:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
459:
458:
454:
453:
452:
450:
449:
448:
414:
413:
377:MOS:INFOBOXFLAG
358:not be included
338:MOS:INFOBOXFLAG
280:MOS:INFOBOXFLAG
263:. Thank you.
261:MOS:INFOBOXFLAG
256:
234:
231:
228:
225:
224:
194:
189:
187:
124:
121:
118:
115:
114:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
457:
455:
447:
446:
441:
436:
431:
426:
416:
415:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
391:
255:
252:
249:
248:
245:
244:
241:
240:
238:
221:the discussion
200:
199:
183:
171:
170:
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
141:Low-importance
137:
131:
130:
128:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
456:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
430:
427:
425:
422:
421:
419:
404:
400:
396:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
305:
301:
300:San Francisco
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
253:
239:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:
197:
196:Cities portal
186:
184:
181:
177:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
146:
142:
136:
133:
132:
129:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
357:
283:
257:
202:
140:
96:
40:WikiProjects
265:Magnolia677
217:settlements
418:Categories
348:) and NY (
116:New Jersey
111:discussion
103:New Jersey
59:New Jersey
30:Stub-class
288:Manhattan
381:Alansohn
324:Alansohn
309:Alansohn
395:Tinton5
362:Tinton5
322:today.
304:Seattle
296:Houston
143:on the
292:Boston
226:Cities
209:cities
168:Cities
36:scale.
213:towns
399:talk
385:talk
366:talk
354:here
328:talk
313:talk
302:and
269:talk
135:Low
420::
401:)
387:)
368:)
330:)
315:)
298:,
294:,
282::
271:)
211:,
397:(
383:(
364:(
326:(
311:(
267:(
147:.
113:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
