Knowledge

Talk:Onaka (grape)

Source đź“ť

105: 84: 1101:
adequate in my mind to support a page for Onaka. I think considering all varieties notable by default is probably safer than not doing so. I would also disagree with the idea that there is nothing much written about it anywhere. There may be very little available on the web, but there are numerous references in books more published during the era of its release. Also, it's a little silly to suggest that this is promotional for Nels Hansen, who is long dead, and never patented the variety. The only lasting value of Onaka is historical, at this stage.
497: 210: 189: 327: 115: 300: 220: 427: 53: 21: 337: 1100:
this decision to merge the Onaka article into a summary list. I agree that to do so would necessarily involve losing relevant information. The connection with Kay Gray, a well-known grape which has played a very significant role in the breeding of varieties for extremely cold environments, is
989:
varietal, there is obviously information available in viticultural circles. As for spamming, grape articles are low risk targets. Spammers (at least in the wine industry) are far more prevalent with winery and wine region article.
1073:
as there is no way that the relevant information on a grape variety (pedigree, properties, history...) can be compressed into a list. And I can't see how that information wouldn't be relevant in an encyclopedia. I added a link to
1008:
commercial. Breeding, which is a very slow process, is typically carried out at government-supported institutes, but some sort of licensing fee (which hardly recovers the whole cost) is typically charged for the end product.
1078:
for this variety. In principle, I consider all registered, released and named varieties as notable. On the other hand, experimental varieties that never got anything more than a serial number, such as a portion of the
984:
didn't even know about this article. The project members have access to quiet a bit of wine related sources including some subscription online resources. Considering this grape's connection to the well known
966:
The problem with this particular cultivar, is that there is nothing much apparently written about it anywhere. Given that cultivars are often commercial products, how do you avoid spamming on the topic?
897:
and shouldn't included merged content talking about the history and description of the grape. Furthermore, it should be well established that all botanical species are inherently notable.
893:
this merger of a valid grape article into the list article. Besides setting a dangerous precedent and this is obviously a bad idea. The grape variety list is suppose to be just that-
435: 310: 822: 1155: 387: 1145: 1051: 282: 272: 31: 923:
are notable (we are not talking about different species, but different cultivars) then I would change my opinion. Does the notability rule extend to varieties?
1160: 1130: 731: 171: 161: 1150: 1140: 1135: 363: 1125: 778:
Just about all of them! Any pictures of wine regions, grape varieties or wine would be useful. In particular we need wine region maps that can be
248: 137: 1075: 849: 397: 350: 305: 937:
While I don't know if it has ever been written down, but it has been accepted practice for years that all varieties are notable, such as
440: 233: 194: 128: 89: 841: 104: 83: 793: 712: 826: 807: 773: 779: 691: 598: 994: 956: 901: 590: 563: 519: 64: 528: 1004:
And on that note, I would consider grape varieties and clones (e.g. virus-free clones of old grape varieties) to be
971: 928: 797: 788: 740: 547: 508: 458: 362:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
27: 582: 938: 811: 586: 555: 37: 52: 967: 924: 757: 70: 524: 20: 551: 543: 537: 225: 247:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
136:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1106: 696: 120: 986: 1088: 1014: 496: 997: 959: 904: 623: 1063: 1046: 704: 619: 607: 981: 749: 671: 577: 326: 299: 1119: 1102: 1080: 1041: 615: 611: 568: 209: 188: 1084: 1010: 765: 667: 663: 647: 631: 243: 991: 953: 898: 761: 679: 639: 635: 342: 133: 1055: 745: 683: 659: 655: 572: 332: 238: 215: 110: 941:. Wine grapes in particular are notable because not only are they individual 426: 1054:
swiftly took place without much participation, and ought to be reopened.
946: 722: 700: 643: 718: 627: 1110: 1092: 1065: 1018: 999: 975: 961: 932: 906: 336: 753: 651: 675: 359: 603: 355: 46: 15: 919:- I nominated the article; if there is a principle that all 425: 237:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 1083:
should typically be kept in lists or summary articles.
857: 853: 845: 484: 479: 474: 469: 354:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 132:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 945:varieties but they are also potentially individual 408: 830: 438:, a project which is currently considered to be 8: 732:Unreferenced biographies of living persons 453: 405: 294: 183: 78: 50: 717:Cleanup lists of wine-related articles: 296: 185: 80: 1156:Low-importance Food and drink articles 829:. Add to the Wikiquote page for wine: 1076:Vitis International Variety Catalogue 30:on 29 July 2009 (UTC). The result of 7: 1146:Low-importance South Dakota articles 798:Nominations for top level importance 434:This article is within the scope of 372:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink 348:This article is within the scope of 231:This article is within the scope of 126:This article is within the scope of 1161:WikiProject Food and drink articles 1131:Low-importance Agriculture articles 505:Here are some tasks you can do for 375:Template:WikiProject Food and drink 69:It is of interest to the following 1151:Stub-Class Food and drink articles 257:Knowledge:WikiProject South Dakota 14: 260:Template:WikiProject South Dakota 146:Knowledge:WikiProject Agriculture 1141:Stub-Class South Dakota articles 1136:WikiProject Agriculture articles 939:all varieties of apple cultivars 529:Great Wine Capitals of the World 495: 335: 325: 298: 218: 208: 187: 149:Template:WikiProject Agriculture 113: 103: 82: 51: 19: 1126:Stub-Class Agriculture articles 392:This article has been rated as 277:This article has been rated as 166:This article has been rated as 26:This article was nominated for 808:Template:Infobox grape variety 1: 366:and see a list of open tasks. 251:and see a list of open tasks. 140:and see a list of open tasks. 840: 1111:07:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1093:15:52, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 1019:15:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 1177: 1066:05:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1000:08:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 976:08:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 962:08:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 933:06:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 907:16:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 398:project's importance scale 351:WikiProject Food and drink 283:project's importance scale 172:project's importance scale 452: 433: 404: 391: 320: 276: 203: 165: 98: 77: 583:wine serving temperature 234:WikiProject South Dakota 1040:this decision to merge 812:Template:Infobox winery 587:Western Australian wine 556:Western Australian wine 378:Food and drink articles 129:WikiProject Agriculture 38:List of grape varieties 823:grape article template 430: 59:This article is rated 980:Well up until today, 794:Operation stub-killer 758:Robert M. Parker, Jr. 429: 263:South Dakota articles 723:articles by category 591:Start class articles 152:Agriculture articles 546:, particularly the 409:Related taskforces: 226:South Dakota portal 697:Cabernet Sauvignon 431: 121:Agriculture portal 65:content assessment 876: 875: 872: 871: 868: 867: 864: 863: 839: 838: 525:Sebastiani family 457:WikiProject Wine 448: 447: 293: 292: 289: 288: 182: 181: 178: 177: 45: 44: 1168: 1061: 1058: 968:VsevolodKrolikov 925:VsevolodKrolikov 624:Champagne (wine) 542:any of the ~700 509:WikiProject Wine 499: 491: 490: 454: 436:Wines task force 416: 406: 380: 379: 376: 373: 370: 345: 340: 339: 329: 322: 321: 316: 313: 302: 295: 265: 264: 261: 258: 255: 228: 223: 222: 221: 212: 205: 204: 199: 191: 184: 154: 153: 150: 147: 144: 123: 118: 117: 116: 107: 100: 99: 94: 86: 79: 62: 56: 55: 47: 23: 16: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1116: 1115: 1059: 1056: 887: 860: 835: 821:Comment on the 705:Sauvignon blanc 620:California wine 608:Australian wine 520:Article request 500: 489: 414: 377: 374: 371: 368: 367: 341: 334: 314: 308: 262: 259: 256: 253: 252: 224: 219: 217: 197: 151: 148: 145: 142: 141: 119: 114: 112: 92: 63:on Knowledge's 60: 12: 11: 5: 1174: 1172: 1164: 1163: 1158: 1153: 1148: 1143: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1095: 1068: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 886: 883: 881: 878: 874: 873: 870: 869: 866: 865: 862: 861: 837: 836: 834: 833: 831:Wikiquote wine 815: 814: 801: 800: 784: 783: 782:for Knowledge. 769: 768: 750:Cabernet franc 736: 735: 727: 726: 708: 707: 692:Articles to FA 687: 686: 672:Sparkling wine 599:Articles to GA 594: 593: 578:Vitis vinifera 559: 558: 533: 532: 515: 502: 501: 494: 488: 487: 482: 477: 472: 466: 463: 462: 450: 449: 446: 445: 432: 422: 421: 419: 417: 411: 410: 402: 401: 394:Low-importance 390: 384: 383: 381: 369:Food and drink 364:the discussion 347: 346: 330: 318: 317: 315:Low‑importance 306:Food and drink 303: 291: 290: 287: 286: 279:Low-importance 275: 269: 268: 266: 249:the discussion 230: 229: 213: 201: 200: 198:Low‑importance 192: 180: 179: 176: 175: 168:Low-importance 164: 158: 157: 155: 138:the discussion 125: 124: 108: 96: 95: 93:Low‑importance 87: 75: 74: 68: 57: 43: 42: 32:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1173: 1162: 1159: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1081:Seibel grapes 1077: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1053: 1049: 1048: 1043: 1042:Onaka (grape) 1039: 1036: 1035: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 998: 995: 993: 988: 983: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964: 963: 960: 957: 955: 951: 948: 944: 940: 936: 935: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 905: 902: 900: 896: 892: 884: 882: 879: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 832: 828: 827:grape infobox 824: 820: 817: 816: 813: 809: 806: 803: 802: 799: 795: 792: 790: 789:Collaboration 786: 785: 781: 777: 775: 774:Photo request 771: 770: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 744: 742: 738: 737: 734: 733: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 714: 710: 709: 706: 702: 698: 695: 693: 689: 688: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 616:Burgundy wine 613: 612:Bordeaux wine 609: 605: 602: 600: 596: 595: 592: 588: 584: 580: 579: 574: 570: 569:Canadian wine 567: 565: 561: 560: 557: 553: 552:miscellaneous 549: 545: 541: 539: 535: 534: 530: 526: 523: 521: 517: 516: 514: 512: 511: 510: 503: 498: 493: 492: 486: 483: 481: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 467: 465: 464: 460: 456: 455: 451: 443: 442: 437: 428: 424: 423: 420: 418: 413: 412: 407: 403: 399: 395: 389: 386: 385: 382: 365: 361: 357: 353: 352: 344: 338: 333: 331: 328: 324: 323: 319: 312: 307: 304: 301: 297: 284: 280: 274: 271: 270: 267: 250: 246: 245: 240: 236: 235: 227: 216: 214: 211: 207: 206: 202: 196: 193: 190: 186: 173: 169: 163: 160: 159: 156: 139: 135: 131: 130: 122: 111: 109: 106: 102: 101: 97: 91: 88: 85: 81: 76: 72: 66: 58: 54: 49: 48: 40: 39: 33: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 1097: 1070: 1045: 1037: 1005: 949: 942: 920: 916: 894: 890: 888: 880: 877: 818: 804: 787: 772: 766:Rioja (wine) 739: 730: 719:all articles 711: 690: 668:Spanish wine 664:Rioja (wine) 648:Italian wine 632:Dessert wine 597: 576: 562: 536: 518: 507: 506: 504: 439: 393: 349: 278: 254:South Dakota 244:South Dakota 242: 232: 195:South Dakota 167: 127: 71:WikiProjects 35: 825:and on the 762:Pinot blanc 680:Tempranillo 640:German wine 636:French wine 343:Food portal 143:Agriculture 134:agriculture 90:Agriculture 1120:Categories 684:Winemaking 660:Pinot noir 656:Pinot gris 573:Greek wine 544:wine stubs 459:open tasks 239:U.S. state 61:Stub-class 921:varieties 36:merge to 1103:Elakazal 987:Kay Gray 947:varietal 917:Question 805:Infobox: 780:licensed 741:Copyedit 701:Riesling 644:Grenache 589:, other 554:" ones, 441:inactive 28:deletion 1085:Tomas e 1044:into a 1011:Tomas e 982:WP:WINE 854:history 850:discuss 746:Aligoté 713:Cleanup 628:Chianti 564:Improve 475:history 396:on the 281:on the 170:on the 1098:Oppose 1071:Oppose 1050:. The 1038:Oppose 895:a list 891:oppose 885:Merger 819:Other: 754:Malbec 652:Merlot 548:region 538:Expand 67:scale. 1006:semi- 950:wines 943:grape 858:watch 676:Syrah 550:and " 485:purge 480:watch 360:drink 1107:talk 1089:talk 1060:URGH 1047:list 1015:talk 992:Agne 972:talk 954:Agne 929:talk 899:Agne 846:edit 842:view 721:and 604:Wine 470:edit 358:and 356:food 311:Wine 34:was 1052:AFD 952:. 630:, 388:Low 273:Low 241:of 162:Low 1122:: 1109:) 1091:) 1017:) 974:) 931:) 889:I 856:• 852:• 848:• 844:• 810:, 796:, 764:, 760:, 756:, 752:, 748:, 703:, 699:, 682:, 678:, 674:, 670:, 666:, 662:, 658:, 654:, 650:, 646:, 642:, 638:, 634:, 626:, 622:, 618:, 614:, 610:, 606:, 585:, 581:, 575:, 571:, 527:, 513:: 415:/ 309:: 1105:( 1087:( 1057:M 1013:( 996:/ 970:( 958:/ 927:( 903:/ 791:: 776:: 743:: 725:. 715:: 694:: 601:: 566:: 540:: 531:. 522:: 461:: 444:. 400:. 285:. 174:. 73:: 41:.

Index

Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion
List of grape varieties

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Agriculture
WikiProject icon
Agriculture portal
WikiProject Agriculture
agriculture
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
South Dakota
WikiProject icon
South Dakota portal
WikiProject South Dakota
U.S. state
South Dakota
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Food and drink
Wine
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑