74:
53:
252:
534:
509:
611:
425:
404:
22:
435:
163:
142:
601:
580:
173:
1047:
A few do, but it's clearly a minority usage. Its coming out of nowhere (the company no longer uses that variant in their logo, nor in running text). And it doesn't make any sense; we wouldn't do this to any other contraction. When's the last time anyone saw, e.g., a song title in the form "D'Ont
1093:
shows a weaker (60%+) preference for Kosh/Gosh, with a pretty strong showing for kosh/Gosh(the choice of ONR and
Dolotta here). The least prevalent appears to be the proposal here of no camel case. All told, I'd say that argues for the status quo, which is the most common variant in books and
876:
I object to the claim that the G is only capitalized for stylization, because it may be a contraction of "By Gosh", which would make "Gosh" a separate word and capitalized in title-case. However, the K is a clear case of only being capitalized in stylization.
1172:
935:– agree with No such user that the G in B'gosh should be lowercase. To CamelCase OshKosh or not is trickier. It is commonly done, but not always and not crucial; essentially decorative, especially in light of its reference to
1234:
being a proper name, I wouldn't put much weight on that – the brand has a long life of its own, and I would say that the city is pretty well-know internationally due to the brand, rather than the other way round.
1175:
747:
Oshkosh now operates two plants in
Kentucky, making less than 10% of the companys merchandise. The rest is produced by subsidiaries in Mexico and Honduras, or outsourced to third-party manufacturers.
270:
373:
841:
1185:, all that's required is lack of a strong showing of consistency for a particular unusual capitalization case; if there's not one, we use lower-case, ergo "Oshkosh B'gosh". Furthermore,
940:
976:
With over 90% sources using "OshKosh", I have little doubt about the judgment. While I support the spirit of MOS:TM, I'm wary of occasional holier-than-thou applications.
73:
52:
1119:. The company isn't even consistent; their present logo reads "OshKosh B'gosh", and RS rarely try to mimic either over-capitalizing stylization, so WP doesn't either.
309:
296:
1362:
669:
659:
229:
1352:
1337:
491:
481:
219:
1357:
1342:
1322:
124:
114:
733:"Oshkosh B'Gosh clothes are no longer made in Oshkosh" - but there's no indication of where production moved to. Please insert this if you know.
1347:
1332:
1327:
1317:
1261:. Since sources are inconclusive, we may as well defer to the way the company styles itself in literature (rather than in logos etc). From
734:
635:
283:
195:
974:
Trademarks in CamelCase are a judgment call. CamelCase may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable.
798:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
698:
303:
457:
845:
1204:
1130:
1090:
1059:
90:
769:
1177:, there's a wild mix of "Oshkosh B'gosh", "OshKosh B'gosh", and "OshKosh B'Gosh", even "Oshkosh B'Gosh", all owing to differing
624:
585:
540:
514:
186:
147:
364:
448:
409:
277:
264:
81:
58:
33:
290:
1219:
Well, YMMV what constitutes a "wild mix", and "strong showing". From your searches above, first 40 hits (two pages):
1268:
1289:
789:
738:
718:
21:
1149:, I usually bow to (or at least seriously consider) your opinion, but this is a pretty obvious case where RS
916:
When deciding how to format a trademark, editors should examine styles already in use by independent sources.
702:
1230:"B'gosh" and "B'Gosh" are more evenly split indeed. I'd call that a "strong showing" for camel case. As for
1009:
879:
1240:
1162:
981:
923:
336:
815:. A bit of a mess, but I think sentiment of the majority and the sourcing provided was in favour of K/g.
714:
1299:
1201:
1127:
1056:
799:
316:
39:
1089:
shows a clear (80%+) preference for Kosh/Gosh, quite a few kosh/Goshes and very few kosh/goshes. And a
1086:
765:
757:
694:
545:
519:
990:
I have no strong objection to the CamelCase here, but I think
Oshkosh is as clear, and is in use.
634:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
456:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
194:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
89:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1231:
1186:
1099:
1038:
995:
952:
936:
906:, which shows that "OshKosh" is near-universally camel-cased. However, it is capitalization of
1275:
1236:
1158:
1082:
1024:
977:
919:
902:(if anywhere). The best litmus test for establishing COMMONNAME for companies is probably the
858:
820:
903:
1196:
1146:
1122:
1051:
616:
322:
178:
1257:
1181:
at different publishers. No convergence on the non-overcapitalized form is required. Per
1015:
899:
871:
831:
812:
761:
353:
440:
329:
251:
1311:
1095:
1034:
991:
963:
948:
1271:
1020:
854:
816:
751:
1157:
consistently, but the proposed form certainly isn't near a point of convergence.
1085:
is correct that a Google News search shows 90%+ usage of "OshKosh B'gosh". But a
1178:
533:
508:
424:
403:
1298:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
885:
606:
430:
168:
1193:
in it; the capitalization in the logo is just stylization for its own sake.
1189:
is a proper name, not a made-up text string, and it does not have a capital-
630:
1279:
1244:
1214:
1166:
1140:
1103:
1069:
1042:
1028:
999:
985:
956:
927:
890:
862:
824:
773:
742:
722:
706:
1182:
1116:
972:
explicitly addresses camel case and its standard is not "not always" but
1094:
scholarship. NSU's alternative of Kosh/gosh would also be supportable.
691:
No details about the origins of the name? What does B'Gosh stand for?
453:
191:
162:
141:
628:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of
1112:
969:
944:
911:
600:
579:
86:
840:– "K" and "G" are only capitalized as a means of stylization.
15:
271:
Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
1153:
try to mimic the "over-capitalizing" stylization. Maybe not
910:
in "B'gosh" that is almost always on the lower-case side.
1265:"OshKosh B'gosh owned by subsidiaries of Carter's, Inc."
1263:], in the legal blurb at the bottom, they tell us that
836:
1288:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
452:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
190:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1019:seems, to me at any rate, to be the best solution.
802:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1302:. No further edits should be made to this section.
543:, a project which is currently considered to be
1081:. What a mess! Sources are all over the place.
752:http://www.answers.com/topic/oshkosh-b-gosh-inc
1033:But sources never cap the G, so why would we?
8:
310:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
297:Category:Company articles needing attention
19:
788:The following is a closed discussion of a
574:
503:
398:
259:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
237:
136:
47:
576:
505:
400:
138:
49:
1264:
973:
915:
943:. I'd downcase both the K and G per
842:2601:8C:4001:DCB9:710B:C71E:5A7F:BF09
335:Help expand stub articles located at
7:
918:, which are rather consistent here.
807:The result of the move request was:
622:This article is within the scope of
539:This article is within the scope of
446:This article is within the scope of
284:Category:Unassessed company articles
184:This article is within the scope of
79:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1363:Low-importance Wisconsin articles
1267:Bloomberg also write it that way.
609:
599:
578:
532:
507:
433:
423:
402:
361:Tag company talk pages with the
250:
171:
161:
140:
72:
51:
20:
1353:Low-importance fashion articles
1338:Low-importance company articles
848:) 19:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
664:This article has been rated as
644:Knowledge:WikiProject Wisconsin
555:Knowledge:WikiProject Retailing
486:This article has been rated as
224:This article has been rated as
204:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies
119:This article has been rated as
1358:Start-Class Wisconsin articles
1343:WikiProject Companies articles
1323:Mid-importance Brands articles
781:Requested move 22 October 2017
743:16:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
647:Template:WikiProject Wisconsin
558:Template:WikiProject Retailing
350:Tag company articles with the
207:Template:WikiProject Companies
1:
1225:Books: OshKosh 25, Oshkosh 15
1194:
1120:
1049:
729:So where *are* they made now?
638:and see a list of open tasks.
466:Knowledge:WikiProject Fashion
460:and see a list of open tasks.
198:and see a list of open tasks.
93:and see a list of open tasks.
1348:Start-Class fashion articles
1333:Start-Class company articles
1280:11:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
1245:09:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
1215:23:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
1167:22:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
1141:20:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
1104:15:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
1070:23:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
1043:01:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
1029:00:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
1000:00:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
986:21:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
957:16:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
928:12:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
891:20:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
863:10:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
825:19:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
723:01:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
707:10:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
469:Template:WikiProject Fashion
241:WikiProject Companies To-do:
99:Knowledge:WikiProject Brands
1328:WikiProject Brands articles
1318:Start-Class Brands articles
1222:News: OshKosh 39, Oshkosh 1
713:"By gosh", presumably... --
102:Template:WikiProject Brands
1379:
670:project's importance scale
492:project's importance scale
230:project's importance scale
125:project's importance scale
774:23:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
663:
594:
527:
485:
418:
236:
223:
156:
118:
67:
46:
1295:Please do not modify it.
795:Please do not modify it.
337:Category:Company stubs
28:This article is rated
1091:Google Scholar search
914:is pretty clear that
625:WikiProject Wisconsin
541:WikiProject Retailing
374:requests for comments
365:WikiProject Companies
187:WikiProject Companies
1087:Google Books search
449:WikiProject Fashion
1232:Oshkosh, Wisconsin
1010:Old Naval Rooftops
939:. For example in
937:Oshkosh, Wisconsin
904:Google news search
650:Wisconsin articles
561:Retailing articles
82:WikiProject Brands
34:content assessment
1083:User:No such user
865:
777:
760:comment added by
697:comment added by
684:
683:
680:
679:
676:
675:
573:
572:
569:
568:
502:
501:
498:
497:
397:
396:
393:
392:
389:
388:
385:
384:
135:
134:
131:
130:
1370:
1297:
1213:
1171:In news sources
1139:
1068:
967:
888:
882:
849:
839:
797:
776:
754:
709:
652:
651:
648:
645:
642:
619:
617:Wisconsin portal
614:
613:
612:
603:
596:
595:
590:
582:
575:
563:
562:
559:
556:
553:
536:
529:
528:
523:
511:
504:
474:
473:
472:fashion articles
470:
467:
464:
443:
438:
437:
436:
427:
420:
419:
414:
406:
399:
368:
357:
323:Portal:Companies
265:Article requests
254:
247:
246:
238:
212:
211:
210:company articles
208:
205:
202:
181:
179:Companies portal
176:
175:
174:
165:
158:
157:
152:
144:
137:
107:
106:
103:
100:
97:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1293:
1211:
1137:
1066:
961:
886:
880:
835:
793:
783:
755:
731:
692:
689:
649:
646:
643:
640:
639:
615:
610:
608:
588:
560:
557:
554:
551:
550:
517:
471:
468:
465:
462:
461:
439:
434:
432:
412:
381:
378:
362:
351:
209:
206:
203:
200:
199:
177:
172:
170:
150:
105:Brands articles
104:
101:
98:
95:
94:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1376:
1374:
1366:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1350:
1345:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1325:
1320:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1304:
1290:requested move
1284:
1283:
1282:
1258:OshKosh B'gosh
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1223:
1209:
1135:
1106:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1064:
1016:Oshkosh B'Gosh
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
930:
900:OshKosh B'gosh
893:
872:Oshkosh B'Gosh
837:Oshkosh B'gosh
832:OshKosh B'Gosh
830:
828:
813:OshKosh B'gosh
805:
804:
790:requested move
784:
782:
779:
735:86.136.250.154
730:
727:
726:
725:
715:Midnight Bliss
688:
685:
682:
681:
678:
677:
674:
673:
666:Low-importance
662:
656:
655:
653:
636:the discussion
621:
620:
604:
592:
591:
589:Low‑importance
583:
571:
570:
567:
566:
564:
537:
525:
524:
512:
500:
499:
496:
495:
488:Low-importance
484:
478:
477:
475:
458:the discussion
445:
444:
441:Fashion portal
428:
416:
415:
413:Low‑importance
407:
395:
394:
391:
390:
387:
386:
383:
382:
380:
379:
377:
376:
370:
369:project banner
359:
347:
339:
325:
312:
299:
286:
273:
258:
256:
255:
243:
242:
234:
233:
226:Low-importance
222:
216:
215:
213:
196:the discussion
183:
182:
166:
154:
153:
151:Low‑importance
145:
133:
132:
129:
128:
121:Mid-importance
117:
111:
110:
108:
91:the discussion
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1375:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1341:
1339:
1336:
1334:
1331:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1303:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1254:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1221:
1220:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1206:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1071:
1061:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1011:
1008:I agree with
1007:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
988:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
965:
960:
959:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
931:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
894:
892:
889:
884:
883:
875:
873:
868:
867:
866:
864:
860:
856:
852:
847:
843:
838:
833:
827:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
803:
801:
796:
791:
786:
785:
780:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
753:
748:
745:
744:
740:
736:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
711:
710:
708:
704:
700:
699:212.143.238.2
696:
686:
671:
667:
661:
658:
657:
654:
637:
633:
632:
627:
626:
618:
607:
605:
602:
598:
597:
593:
587:
584:
581:
577:
565:
548:
547:
542:
538:
535:
531:
530:
526:
521:
516:
513:
510:
506:
493:
489:
483:
480:
479:
476:
459:
455:
451:
450:
442:
431:
429:
426:
422:
421:
417:
411:
408:
405:
401:
375:
371:
366:
360:
355:
349:
348:
346:
344:
340:
338:
334:
332:
331:
326:
324:
321:
319:
318:
313:
311:
308:
306:
305:
300:
298:
295:
293:
292:
287:
285:
282:
280:
279:
274:
272:
269:
267:
266:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
248:
245:
244:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
221:
218:
217:
214:
197:
193:
189:
188:
180:
169:
167:
164:
160:
159:
155:
149:
146:
143:
139:
126:
122:
116:
113:
112:
109:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1294:
1287:
1255:
1237:No such user
1197:
1190:
1179:house styles
1159:No such user
1154:
1150:
1123:
1108:
1078:
1052:
1013:
978:No such user
932:
920:No such user
907:
898:and move to
895:
878:
869:
850:
829:
808:
806:
794:
787:
749:
746:
732:
690:
665:
629:
623:
544:
487:
447:
356:|Companies}}
342:
341:
328:
327:
315:
314:
302:
301:
289:
288:
276:
275:
263:
262:
225:
185:
120:
80:
40:WikiProjects
1300:move review
1198:SMcCandlish
1147:SMcCandlish
1124:SMcCandlish
1053:SMcCandlish
941:latest news
800:move review
756:—Preceding
693:—Preceding
30:Start-class
1312:Categories
1174:and books
762:Willyandre
641:Wisconsin
631:Wisconsin
586:Wisconsin
552:Retailing
515:Retailing
201:Companies
192:companies
148:Companies
1256:Move to
1183:MOS:CAPS
1117:MOS:CAPS
1096:Dohn joe
1035:Dicklyon
1014:Move to
992:Dicklyon
964:Dicklyon
949:Dicklyon
870:Move to
851:Relisted
770:contribs
758:unsigned
750:Source:
695:unsigned
687:Untitled
546:inactive
520:inactive
358:template
317:Maintain
291:Copyedit
1272:Amakuru
1187:Oshkosh
1109:Support
1021:Dolotta
933:Support
887:(talk)
855:Jenks24
817:Jenks24
668:on the
490:on the
463:Fashion
454:Fashion
410:Fashion
372:Answer
304:Infobox
228:on the
123:on the
1212:ⱷ<
1145:Huh?!
1138:ⱷ<
1113:MOS:TM
1079:Oppose
1067:ⱷ<
970:MOS:TM
945:MOS:TM
912:MOS:TM
896:Oppose
354:portal
278:Assess
96:Brands
87:brands
59:Brands
36:scale.
1207:: -->
1155:quite
1133:: -->
1062:: -->
1048:Go"?
809:moved
343:Other
330:Stubs
1276:talk
1241:talk
1163:talk
1111:per
1100:talk
1039:talk
1025:talk
996:talk
982:talk
953:talk
924:talk
881:ONR
859:talk
846:talk
821:talk
766:talk
739:talk
719:talk
703:talk
1292:.
811:to
660:Low
482:Low
220:Low
115:Mid
1314::
1278:)
1270:—
1243:)
1208:ⱷ҅
1195:—
1165:)
1151:do
1134:ⱷ҅
1121:—
1115:,
1102:)
1063:ⱷ҅
1050:—
1041:)
1027:)
1012:.
998:)
984:)
968::
955:)
947:.
926:)
861:)
853:.
834:→
823:)
792:.
772:)
768:•
741:)
721:)
705:)
367:}}
363:{{
352:{{
1274:(
1239:(
1210:ᴥ
1205:¢
1202:☏
1191:K
1161:(
1136:ᴥ
1131:¢
1128:☏
1098:(
1065:ᴥ
1060:¢
1057:☏
1037:(
1023:(
994:(
980:(
966::
962:@
951:(
922:(
908:g
874:.
857:(
844:(
819:(
764:(
737:(
717:(
701:(
672:.
549:.
522:)
518:(
494:.
345::
333::
320::
307::
294::
281::
268::
232:.
127:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
