74:
53:
356:
430:
284:
263:
179:
158:
464:
22:
84:
189:
822:
indicates multiple elements need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Overtime in sports is a primarily US English term. I'm not proposing this move, the onus is on those proposing the move to demonstrate an analysis of reliable sources. I'm more than happy to change my mind, but if an analysis
752:
indicates multiple elements for this purpose. There needs to be an analysis of reliable sourcing and also some awareness that there are quite widespread varieties of
English - overtime might be common in some US sports, but it is not, for example, the most common term in the most played sport in the
468:
718:
indicates 2k incoming views a month which makes sense for a topic of significance, and hatnote as the top link, though with only 53 identified outgoing clickstreams, which is quite unimpressive. There isn't a whole lot of obvious correlation, at logarithmic scale view, in
823:
cannot be presented with regard to reliable sources I do not see why a term which is universally used in one way acorss multiple
English speaking environments should not be primary against a term which is specific to one particular English speaking environment. Regards,
779:
A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that
912:
clearly indicates case-by-case analysis is required and further cautions around the sole use of pageviews/nav links etc: "Tools that may help to support the determination of a primary topic in a discussion (but are
803:
bias is showing here. "Overtime" can refer to many things, one of which is in the context of work hours. Your reply asserts that this meaning is the primary topic with no citation of any kind of sources.
367:
1064:
130:
1079:
1059:
744:
I'm really not aware of any circumstance where page views on
Knowledge determines primary topic and FWIW this is circular referencing, which is simply against guidelines (
235:
245:
1084:
1074:
531:
900:
There's no "failure" in this discussion - note: "While
Knowledge has no single criterion for defining a primary topic, two major aspects that editors commonly
632:
211:
867:, which is long-term significance. Both the work concept and the sports concept are notable. I'm not, however, buying the idea that the work concept
480:
140:
1069:
202:
163:
1094:
334:
324:
753:
world: football uses injury time and extra time. Overtime is overwhelmingly used in the context of work and the primary topic. Regards, --
516:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
652:
550:
106:
1089:
444:
672:
300:
467:
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
97:
58:
1004:
Natural disambiguation that is unambiguous, commonly used, and clear is generally preferable to parenthetical disambiguation
1046:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
33:
401:
396:
391:
909:
819:
749:
680:
660:
640:
361:
291:
268:
574:
507:
436:
374:
1011:
963:
21:
704:
544:
194:
105:
articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
818:
The first problem is self-referencing (ie self-generated content) *in the absence* of any other analysis.
774:
1007:
959:
676:
656:
636:
517:
39:
589:
727:
to avoid astonishing anyone, and check if the navigation outcomes changed significantly afterwards. --
1032:
926:
846:
828:
758:
569:
440:
883:
787:
769:" I'm really not aware of any circumstance where page views on Knowledge determines primary topic "
585:
520:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
299:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
210:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
73:
52:
989:
891:
809:
697:
619:
596:
538:
488:
380:
695:
in common usage I think the work meaning would be primary but its clearly not primary by views.
973:
949:
783:
472:
981:
872:
800:
414:
376:
1028:
999:
922:
842:
824:
754:
745:
720:
89:
283:
262:
611:
1053:
985:
887:
864:
858:
838:
805:
732:
724:
615:
607:
592:
484:
861:, which is the pageviews. The article about the work concept fails this criterion.
882:
fails one, and quite likely both, of the determining criteria. For this reason,
715:
463:
207:
178:
157:
795:"Overtime is overwhelmingly used in the context of work and the primary topic."
977:
184:
79:
83:
879:
728:
578:
565:
102:
206:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
188:
869:"has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value"
773:
Pageviews is one of two factors we consider in a primary topic. Per
723:. I suppose it makes sense to do this as an experiment, format with
378:
786:
actually gets the majority of the pageviews, but I am proposing a
588:. Sports-related overtime topics have a clear pageviews advantage
296:
1036:
1015:
993:
967:
930:
895:
850:
832:
813:
762:
736:
710:
684:
664:
644:
623:
600:
558:
492:
855:
There are two considerations when determining a primary topic.
424:
381:
15:
716:
https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Overtime
917:, due to unreliability, potential bias, and other reasons)"
435:
On 2 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be
954:
948:
per
Goldsztajn. There may even be an argument to move
458:
Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment
295:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1027:. Very clear primary topic internationally. --
8:
1065:Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
915:not considered absolute determining factors
19:
837:As a proverbial footnote, would highlight
506:The following is a closed discussion of a
350:
257:
152:
47:
1080:High-importance organized labour articles
1060:Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
481:Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
479:Above undated message substituted from
259:
154:
49:
1003:
675:has been notified of this discussion.
655:has been notified of this discussion.
635:has been notified of this discussion.
591:, and also have long-term notability.
220:Knowledge:WikiProject Organized Labour
1085:WikiProject Organized Labour articles
1075:Start-Class organized labour articles
223:Template:WikiProject Organized Labour
7:
721:a page views comparison of the three
525:The result of the move request was:
289:This article is within the scope of
200:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1042:The discussion above is closed.
1006:. That's why we seek consensus.
462:
428:
354:
282:
261:
187:
177:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
606:At first glance, it seems like
329:This article has been rated as
240:This article has been rated as
135:This article has been rated as
499:Requested move 2 February 2024
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Business
1:
1070:WikiProject Business articles
303:and see a list of open tasks.
214:and see a list of open tasks.
121:WikiProject Business articles
118:Template:WikiProject Business
109:and see a list of open tasks.
1095:Mid-importance Time articles
1037:14:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1016:19:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
998:Maybe, but it would satisfy
994:17:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
968:12:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
931:04:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
896:22:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
878:So the article currently at
851:20:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
833:20:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
814:17:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
763:11:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
737:09:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
711:17:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
685:16:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
665:16:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
645:16:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
633:WikiProject Organized Labour
624:09:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
601:07:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
559:17:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
493:08:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
203:WikiProject Organized Labour
1111:
748:). The corrrect guideline
335:project's importance scale
309:Knowledge:WikiProject Time
246:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
1090:Start-Class Time articles
575:Overtime (disambiguation)
413:This page is archived by
328:
312:Template:WikiProject Time
277:
239:
226:organized labour articles
172:
134:
67:
46:
1044:Please do not modify it.
782:Note that in this case,
513:Please do not modify it.
958:to avoid the dab term.
614:might also be options.
195:Organized Labour portal
28:This article is rated
871:on the sole basis of
471:. Student editor(s):
886:is the best choice.
653:WikiProject Business
98:WikiProject Business
980:would run afoul of
910:WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY
820:WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY
750:WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY
469:on the course page
34:content assessment
974:Overtime (sports)
950:Overtime (sports)
920:
907:
784:Overtime (sports)
687:
667:
647:
622:
535:
532:non-admin closure
455:
454:
423:
422:
418:
349:
348:
345:
344:
341:
340:
256:
255:
252:
251:
151:
150:
147:
146:
1102:
957:
919:(emphasis added)
918:
906:(emphasis added)
905:
707:
700:
677:Vanderwaalforces
673:WikiProject Time
670:
657:Vanderwaalforces
650:
637:Vanderwaalforces
630:
618:
557:
553:
547:
541:
529:
515:
495:
466:
443:. The result of
432:
431:
425:
412:
382:
358:
357:
351:
317:
316:
313:
310:
307:
292:WikiProject Time
286:
279:
278:
273:
265:
258:
228:
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:Organized Labour
208:Organized Labour
197:
192:
191:
181:
174:
173:
168:
164:Organized Labour
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
953:
775:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
705:
698:
570:Overtime (work)
551:
545:
539:
536:
511:
501:
478:
460:
441:Overtime (work)
429:
419:
383:
377:
355:
314:
311:
308:
305:
304:
271:
242:High-importance
225:
222:
219:
216:
215:
193:
186:
167:High‑importance
166:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
90:Business portal
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1108:
1106:
1098:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1052:
1051:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1008:YorkshireExpat
960:YorkshireExpat
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
876:
862:
856:
797:
791:
771:
739:
713:
689:
688:
668:
648:
627:
626:
612:Overtime hours
582:
581:
572:
562:
523:
522:
508:requested move
502:
500:
497:
459:
456:
453:
452:
445:the discussion
433:
421:
420:
411:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
399:
394:
386:
385:
384:
379:
375:
373:
372:
359:
347:
346:
343:
342:
339:
338:
331:Mid-importance
327:
321:
320:
318:
301:the discussion
287:
275:
274:
272:Mid‑importance
266:
254:
253:
250:
249:
238:
232:
231:
229:
212:the discussion
199:
198:
182:
170:
169:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Mid-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1107:
1096:
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1045:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
956:
951:
947:
944:
932:
928:
924:
916:
911:
903:
899:
898:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
874:
870:
866:
863:
860:
857:
854:
853:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
835:
834:
830:
826:
821:
817:
816:
815:
811:
807:
802:
799:I think your
798:
796:
792:
789:
785:
781:
776:
772:
770:
766:
765:
764:
760:
756:
751:
747:
743:
740:
738:
734:
730:
726:
725:MOS:DABCOMMON
722:
717:
714:
712:
708:
702:
701:
699:Crouch, Swale
694:
691:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
669:
666:
662:
658:
654:
649:
646:
642:
638:
634:
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:Overtime work
605:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
590:
587:
580:
576:
573:
571:
567:
564:
563:
561:
560:
556:
554:
548:
542:
533:
528:
521:
519:
514:
509:
504:
503:
498:
496:
494:
490:
486:
482:
476:
474:
470:
465:
457:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
427:
426:
416:
409:
408:
403:
400:
398:
395:
393:
390:
389:
388:
387:
370:
369:
364:
363:
353:
352:
336:
332:
326:
323:
322:
319:
315:Time articles
302:
298:
294:
293:
288:
285:
281:
280:
276:
270:
267:
264:
260:
247:
243:
237:
234:
233:
230:
213:
209:
205:
204:
196:
190:
185:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1043:
1024:
945:
914:
901:
884:WP:NOPRIMARY
868:
793:
788:WP:NOPRIMARY
778:
767:
741:
696:
692:
586:WP:NOPRIMARY
583:
537:
526:
524:
512:
505:
477:
473:Corbin Apple
461:
448:
366:
360:
330:
290:
241:
201:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
921:. Regards,
841:. Regards,
518:move review
415:ClueBot III
30:Start-class
1054:Categories
1029:Necrothesp
978:Extra time
955:Extra time
923:Goldsztajn
843:Goldsztajn
825:Goldsztajn
755:Goldsztajn
546:Howl at me
527:not moved.
982:WP:RETAIN
873:WP:ENGVAR
801:WP:NWFCTM
449:not moved
1000:WP:NCDAB
986:162 etc.
902:consider
888:162 etc.
880:Overtime
806:162 etc.
746:WP:USERG
616:Dekimasu
593:162 etc.
579:Overtime
566:Overtime
552:My hunts
485:PrimeBOT
362:Archives
112:Business
103:business
59:Business
972:Moving
693:Support
333:on the
244:on the
139:on the
1025:Oppose
946:Oppose
865:WP:PT2
859:WP:PT1
839:WP:PT2
790:setup.
742:Oppose
671:Note:
651:Note:
631:Note:
540:NW1223
36:scale.
794:: -->
780:term.
768:: -->
555:: -->
437:moved
368:Index
1033:talk
1012:talk
990:talk
964:talk
927:talk
892:talk
847:talk
829:talk
810:talk
759:talk
733:talk
706:talk
681:talk
661:talk
641:talk
597:talk
543:<
489:talk
447:was
402:2017
397:2016
392:2013
306:Time
297:Time
269:Time
236:High
976:to
952:to
729:Joy
709:)
610:or
483:by
439:to
325:Mid
131:Mid
1056::
1035:)
1014:)
1002:.
992:)
984:.
966:)
929:)
908:.
904:"
894:)
849:)
831:)
812:)
777:,
761:)
735:)
683:)
663:)
643:)
620:よ!
599:)
584:–
577:→
568:→
510:.
491:)
475:.
371:)
1031:(
1010:(
988:(
962:(
925:(
890:(
875:.
845:(
827:(
808:(
757:(
731:(
703:(
679:(
659:(
639:(
595:(
549:•
534:)
530:(
487:(
451:.
417:.
365:(
337:.
248:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
