306:
285:
418:
316:
602:
577:
712:
652:
505:
484:
408:
390:
254:
223:
1144:
Here's the issue. If someone sees a claim missing that they "know" to be true they will add it back. This article, unfortunately, is the major source for third party claims of numbers of books sold, that are then used as sources. I happen to believe that the HP claims are substantially correct, as
1145:
it is a modern book published by a reputable publisher. However some of the other top ranked items are almost certainly wrong, in some cases I have spent considerable time researching them. I believe that we need an RFC to resolve these longstanding issues, and if necessary an AFD. All the best:
815:
from the list due to it lacking a comprehensive, reliable sales figure and the "500 million" figure lacking basis in reliable sources. Yet, over the course of four days since the most recent addition, only two challenges have been made, both of which were promptly reverted. And this isn't the first
881:
has a "rational basis" due to the sheer number of editions and translations over the span of 400 years, it is a "speculative and ultimately unprovable claim" and "we cannot how know how many copies have been made, sold, or, much less, read in the four hundred years since
1058:, was said to have sold 77 million copies, and the books published afterward were said to have sold 65 million. I removed them due to the sources being, at most, questionable, seemingly written by no-name websites that are more focused on entertainment than journalism.
876:
is the "most published work of literature in history". I believe his argument strongly applies in this discussion as it pretty much serves as an academic vindication of our rationale since 2008. Egginton states that while the claim bestseller status of
901:
are insufficient to actually support a questionable sales figure that, as corroborated by a prolific university professor, is impossible to determine with any degree of certainty. As such, I move to revert this and any additional attempt at including
954:
which puts the number at around 60 million, a much more realistic estimate. 500 million is just preposterous for a non-religious book and any source claiming such a high number cannot be taken seriously unless they provide some hard evidence.--
153:
872:. While he never mentions the claimed 500 million sales figure, in footnote 20 of the introduction, Egginton addresses the similar claim that Cervantes is the "most widely read author of all time" and that
372:
827:
To Demian's credit, he does supply sources that are more reputable than the ones I previously reverted. However, this does not mean they are good enough. Looking at the sources include, we got
147:
1063:
I also could not verify the sales figures myself through other sources. In the edit summary of my removal, I asked that if anyone disagreed, we could discuss it in the talk page.
44:
214:
1270:
1235:
362:
1230:
79:
851:. I do not find these to be sufficient sources for backing up the "500 million" claim, especially since such a figure would be unheard of for a book.
338:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
1054:
559:
1260:
840:
670:
549:
85:
329:
290:
168:
1265:
1250:
1240:
438:
135:
1192:
1081:
730:
1061:
1255:
1245:
816:
time someone has added this entry; the last time it was added in
September 2023, I reverted it due to it lacking reliable sources
525:
442:
1108:
836:
608:
582:
99:
30:
104:
20:
928:
Please feel free to remove any entry you feel is insufficiently well sourced. We can discuss here if there is disagreement.
906:
in the list unless an excellent, high-quality source can be found declaring once-and-for-all the sales figure of the novel.
129:
74:
1162:
I'd support an RfC, though not an AfD, to resolve the issues this list currently has. In the meantime, I've removed the
265:
125:
521:
517:
512:
489:
432:
395:
65:
828:
887:
222:
185:
24:
175:
1150:
1025:
994:
965:
936:
915:
674:
981:
While our 45 million is less than some claims for this book (60 million is the most I've seen) not only is this
811:
to this list with the widely contested figure of 500 million. The consensus ever since 2008 has been to exclude
305:
284:
233:
720:
660:
1196:
1013:
852:
109:
1075:
951:
868:
271:
141:
1069:
1147:
1022:
991:
933:
804:
613:
587:
446:
956:
783:
1171:
1135:
1116:
960:
911:
824:
to this list. I want to try to settle this once and for all without turning this into an edit war.
787:
678:
161:
55:
337:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
238:
70:
1087:
848:
771:
51:
888:
university professor, prolific writer, and researcher that specializes in
Spanish literature
863:
759:
Number of copies sold seems to be wrong. This source says it's 100 million sold worldwide:
235:
989:. Adding to the uncertainty in this case the author bought the publisher. All the best:
450:
1111:, I am opening up a discussion. What do you think? Should we keep or remove these books?
1215:
1211:
1200:
1175:
1167:
1155:
1139:
1131:
1120:
1112:
1030:
999:
941:
907:
791:
691:
Wikipedians have their own word for malignant and self-sustaining cycles of this kind:
334:
844:
237:
1224:
1127:
1059:
1016:
from 2014 gives a claim of 65 million, far less than the 140 million we give, though
986:
731:"Umberto Eco, The Da Vinci Code, and the Intellectual in the Age of Popular Culture"
417:
315:
423:
321:
832:
601:
576:
711:
651:
413:
311:
1098:
1207:
504:
483:
407:
389:
1020:
it has sold another 75 million in the subsequent decade. All the best:
1128:
WP:RSN#Hypable, Fansided, and
Wordsrated in list of best-selling books
1101:
that I find to be even more questionable, considering it comes from a
437:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can
1103:
841:
a listicle by a book publisher that might suffer from citogenesis
890:
and he is saying that we don't know the actual sales figure of
706:
646:
247:
239:
15:
755:
Number of copies of sold of Your
Erroneous Zones is erroneous
524:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
897:
TL;DR the sources used for the latest attempt including
1094:
1045:
921:
There is unlikely to ever be such a source for that or
849:
a listicle from a website that specializes in geography
817:
985:
a very unlikely figure, in 2010 the touted figure was
894:. The claimed figure of 500 million is unverifiable.
160:
1191:
Why is Anne Franks diary not marked as non-fiction?
333:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1066:It appears someone did disagree, as 13 days later,
1052:books from the list. At the time, the second book,
837:a listicle from the questionable Business Insider
611:, a project which is currently considered to be
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
449:. To improve this article, please refer to the
925:as given at the moment. We really need a FAQ.
853:Exceptional claims require exceptional sources
174:
8:
516:, an attempt to structure and organize all
571:
478:
445:. To use this banner, please refer to the
384:
279:
253:
251:
1012:Our sources are not great for this one.
520:. If you wish to help, please visit the
443:discuss matters related to book articles
1271:Knowledge pages referenced by the press
1055:Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
858:However, the main reason why I believe
796:
762:
573:
480:
451:relevant guideline for the type of work
386:
281:
1236:Top-importance Bibliographies articles
1107:tool. So, to complete the process of
7:
1097:I had removed from this list with a
886:was first published". Egginton is a
862:should not be included is Professor
818:nine days after the edit in question
607:This article is within the scope of
510:This article is within the scope of
429:This article is within the scope of
347:Knowledge:WikiProject Bibliographies
327:This article is within the scope of
820:. Right now, I object to including
350:Template:WikiProject Bibliographies
270:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1231:List-Class Bibliographies articles
829:a random trivia game by Britannica
14:
721:mentioned by a media organization
661:mentioned by a media organization
833:a BBC listicle aimed at children
710:
650:
600:
575:
503:
482:
416:
406:
388:
314:
304:
283:
252:
221:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
800:- Let's just get this over with
729:Douglas Merrell (5 June 2017).
671:"The all-conquering Knowledge?"
669:Peter Thonemann (26 May 2016).
623:Knowledge:WikiProject Retailing
554:This article has been rated as
367:This article has been rated as
1126:Started similar discussion at
626:Template:WikiProject Retailing
1:
845:a random writer's advice blog
341:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1261:Mid-importance List articles
869:The Man Who Invented Fiction
1216:11:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
1201:11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
534:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
459:Knowledge:WikiProject Books
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1287:
1266:WikiProject Lists articles
1251:WikiProject Books articles
1241:WikiProject Bibliographies
916:05:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
807:is the latest user to add
792:00:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
560:project's importance scale
537:Template:WikiProject Lists
462:Template:WikiProject Books
330:WikiProject Bibliographies
25:List of best-selling books
1176:16:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
675:Times Literary Supplement
595:
553:
498:
401:
366:
299:
278:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1256:List-Class List articles
1246:List-Class Book articles
1156:15:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
1140:14:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
1121:00:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
1109:WP:Bold, revert, discuss
1048:, I removed most of the
966:11:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
1093:, without explanation,
1031:13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
1000:06:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
942:13:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
518:list pages on Knowledge
353:Bibliographies articles
1187:Anne Frank is Fiction?
974:Another dubious claim
719:This article has been
659:This article has been
260:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
773:I Can See Clearly Now
677:(TLS). Archived from
609:WikiProject Retailing
215:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
105:No original research
1206:Thanks, corrected.
1095:restored the books
923:Tale of Two Cities
629:Retailing articles
266:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1159:
1034:
1003:
969:
945:
750:
749:
705:
704:
645:
644:
641:
640:
637:
636:
570:
569:
566:
565:
513:WikiProject Lists
477:
476:
473:
472:
433:WikiProject Books
383:
382:
379:
378:
246:
245:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1278:
1154:
1092:
1091:
1072:
1046:On June 14, 2024
1029:
998:
964:
940:
864:William Egginton
778:
777:
767:
742:
740:
738:
714:
707:
697:
688:
686:
654:
647:
631:
630:
627:
624:
621:
604:
597:
596:
591:
579:
572:
542:
541:
538:
535:
532:
507:
500:
499:
494:
486:
479:
467:
466:
463:
460:
457:
439:join the project
426:
421:
420:
410:
403:
402:
392:
385:
373:importance scale
355:
354:
351:
348:
345:
324:
319:
318:
308:
301:
300:
295:
287:
280:
263:
257:
256:
255:
248:
240:
226:
225:
216:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1221:
1220:
1189:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1043:
1010:
979:
805:DemianStratford
802:
781:
769:
768:
764:
757:
746:
745:
736:
734:
728:
724:
701:
700:
684:
682:
668:
664:
628:
625:
622:
619:
618:
585:
539:
536:
533:
530:
529:
492:
464:
461:
458:
455:
454:
422:
415:
352:
349:
346:
343:
342:
320:
313:
293:
264:on Knowledge's
261:
242:
241:
236:
213:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1284:
1282:
1274:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1042:
1037:
1035:
1009:
1006:
1004:
987:over 2 million
978:
976:The Ginger Man
972:
970:
948:
947:
946:
931:All the best:
929:
926:
801:
795:
780:
779:
761:
756:
753:
748:
747:
744:
743:
725:
718:
717:
715:
703:
702:
699:
698:
681:on 26 May 2016
665:
658:
657:
655:
643:
642:
639:
638:
635:
634:
632:
605:
593:
592:
580:
568:
567:
564:
563:
556:Mid-importance
552:
546:
545:
543:
508:
496:
495:
493:Mid‑importance
487:
475:
474:
471:
470:
468:
428:
427:
411:
399:
398:
393:
381:
380:
377:
376:
369:Top-importance
365:
359:
358:
356:
344:Bibliographies
339:the discussion
335:Bibliographies
326:
325:
309:
297:
296:
294:Top‑importance
291:Bibliographies
288:
276:
275:
269:
258:
244:
243:
234:
232:
231:
228:
227:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1283:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1228:
1226:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1186:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1100:
1096:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1071:
1064:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1051:
1047:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1019:
1015:
1008:The Alchemist
1007:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
993:
988:
984:
977:
973:
971:
967:
962:
958:
953:
943:
939:
938:
935:
930:
927:
924:
920:
919:
918:
917:
913:
909:
905:
900:
895:
893:
889:
885:
880:
875:
871:
870:
865:
861:
856:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
825:
823:
819:
814:
810:
806:
799:
794:
793:
789:
785:
775:
774:
770:Dyer, Wayne.
766:
763:
760:
754:
752:
732:
727:
726:
722:
716:
713:
709:
708:
696:
694:
680:
676:
672:
667:
666:
662:
656:
653:
649:
648:
633:
616:
615:
610:
606:
603:
599:
598:
594:
589:
584:
581:
578:
574:
561:
557:
551:
548:
547:
544:
540:List articles
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
509:
506:
502:
501:
497:
491:
488:
485:
481:
469:
465:Book articles
452:
448:
447:documentation
444:
440:
436:
435:
434:
425:
419:
414:
412:
409:
405:
404:
400:
397:
394:
391:
387:
374:
370:
364:
361:
360:
357:
340:
336:
332:
331:
323:
317:
312:
310:
307:
303:
302:
298:
292:
289:
286:
282:
277:
273:
267:
259:
250:
249:
230:
229:
224:
220:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1193:185.6.70.178
1190:
1164:Harry Potter
1163:
1146:
1102:
1084:
1078:
1070:198.24.95.26
1065:
1053:
1050:Harry Potter
1049:
1044:
1040:Harry Potter
1039:
1021:
1017:
1014:This article
1011:
990:
982:
980:
975:
949:
932:
922:
903:
898:
896:
891:
883:
878:
873:
867:
859:
857:
826:
821:
812:
808:
803:
797:
782:
772:
765:
758:
751:
735:. Retrieved
692:
690:
683:. Retrieved
679:the original
612:
555:
522:project page
511:
431:
430:
424:Books portal
368:
328:
322:Books portal
272:WikiProjects
218:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
983:prima facie
952:this source
904:Don Quixote
899:Don Quixote
892:Don Quixote
884:Don Quixote
879:Don Quixote
874:Don Quixote
860:Don Quixote
822:Don Quixote
813:Don Quixote
809:Don Quixote
798:Don Quixote
693:citogenesis
148:free images
31:not a forum
1225:Categories
1151:Farmbrough
1026:Farmbrough
995:Farmbrough
937:Farmbrough
733:. Springer
526:discussion
262:List-class
1168:Lazman321
1166:entries.
1132:Lazman321
1113:Lazman321
957:Adriano 7
908:Lazman321
784:Yairharel
776:. p. 150.
737:14 August
620:Retailing
583:Retailing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1082:contribs
950:I found
614:inactive
588:inactive
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
558:on the
371:on the
219:90 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1104:Wordle
1099:source
847:, and
685:26 May
268:scale.
126:Google
1088:WHOIS
1018:maybe
531:Lists
490:Lists
456:Books
396:Books
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1212:talk
1208:Fram
1197:talk
1172:talk
1148:Rich
1136:talk
1117:talk
1076:talk
1023:Rich
992:Rich
961:talk
934:Rich
912:talk
788:talk
739:2018
687:2016
441:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
866:'s
550:Mid
363:Top
176:TWL
1227::
1214:)
1199:)
1174:)
1138:)
1130:.
1119:)
914:)
855:.
843:,
839:,
835:,
831:,
790:)
689:.
673:.
217::
209:,
205:,
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1210:(
1195:(
1170:(
1158:.
1134:(
1115:(
1090:)
1085:·
1079:·
1074:(
1033:.
1002:.
968:.
963:)
959:(
944:.
910:(
786:(
741:.
723::
695:.
663::
617:.
590:)
586:(
562:.
528:.
453:.
375:.
274::
211:6
207:5
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.