Talk:List of best-selling books/Archive 3

761:

than 400 million copies sold" reports originate. (They don't come, for instance, from Nielsen BookScan.) So perhaps, at some time, such a reliable source will report total sales estimates for one of the books apart from "Deathly Hallows." However, for whatever reason, the only such estimates that have been reported, so far as we are aware, are on the page you are viewing right now. Since Knowledge is not a reliable source and since original research is not allowed, these estimates may not be used in the article itself. And I agree with Fram that figures known to be grossly incomplete should not be listed, since we have not done that for any other item on this list. I hope that Bloomsbury will eventually report sales figures for the individual books (which can then be vetted by "independent, reliable" sources), but (apparently) with the single exception of Deathly Hallows, they have not done so.

884:

items with sales figures coincide with the Howstuffworks list. (Although "Watership Down" is omitted, it was only in a tie for the last place so would not displace another item.) It is obvious that the Howstuffworks list was lifted directly from here during that period, as so many other "facts" on the web are simply lifted from Knowledge without attribution and without verification. It is impossible for the reverse to be the case because on this page, each of the item sales figures was continuously shifting up and down, literally day by day, with the revisions being made by dozens of different editors--many of whom constantly disagreed with each other--and most certainly not by one single editor. The items did NOT all suddenly change in unison on a single day, which is exactly what they would have had to have done had they been lifted all together directly from the Howstuffworks list.

283:

where actual controversies exist regarding sales figures. In most cases, we simply cite the most recent--and therefore, most likely to be up-to-date--figures referenced in a reliable source. Regarding sold vs. printed, our policy has long been to include only sales figures in cases where sources allow the two to be distinguished, which is only very rarely. Decisions regarding items to exclude were primarily based on the practical impossibility of verifying sales figures in those cases, as is clearly stated in the article. Regarding other distinctions such as what constitutes a book, a series, etc., those sometimes difficult judgments are discussed on this page. The fact that such editorial distinctions and judgments may sometimes be challenging does not imply that they constitute Original Research.

1015:

the 21 entries has 10 different possible values--roughly the number of different figures we ordinarily see on this page, over time, for a particular item--then the probability of obtaining one specific set of figures for all 21 entries--even assuming that the titles of the entries are the same and in the same order--is approximately 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. It can't happen. If there were only THREE different possible values for each entry, the probability of observing one particular set is less than 1 in 10,000,000,000. The "Howstuffworks" page was simply copied from Knowledge; there is absolutely no reason to believe that any other references were used to create that page.

1638:

of millions or tens of millions of printed but not distributed books. The only thing that would need changing is the name of the column entitled "Approximate sales" to "Approximate copies printed". Although "best-selling" is arguably a colloquialism for a highly printed books which is used because of a lack of pleasant-sounding alternatives, a list of most-printed religious and political books within this list without any name change might not be accepted by some people because of their interpretations of the Knowledge naming policy, and much the same reason why political and religious books aren't already included.

1763:. But since we are talking about online book sellers here, and not articles, I'm not sure if the source will be accepted. (And unfortunately, because there is little information about how many books in total that has been sold by one of the creators, Warren Murphy, they simply add the sales numbers from Destroyer to the list (despite the fact that most of the Destroyer books have been written by ghost writers), and then writes something like "Murphy's books and stories have sold fifty million copies worldwide and won a dozen national awards", which makes it even harder to find the required info.) 1340:

selling books of all time. Every single one belongs on this page. And yet they are not on this page, and there is no footnote or mention of this fact anywhere. Now this page is worthless. It is less than worthless, it is misleading. Someone who comes to this page to learn what the best-selling books of all time are would be left with the impression that Don Quixiote and the top 6 Harry Potter books do not belong on this list. It would be better if this page did not exist, because then no one would be misled by its false promise to inform you what the best-selling books of all time are.

1290:

Bloomsbury (the UK publisher), though clearly not an "independent" source, to be the ONLY reliable source for worldwide Harry Potter sales figures. They are the only ones in a position to have reports from all of the more than 100 nations and territories in which sales have been made. Proprietary reporting agencies such as Nielsen are simply not able to offer complete figures, and many (or most) territories have no such reporting agencies. I believe we have to exercise judgment as to which non-independent sources are reliable, and this is such a case.

906:

myself to find reliable figures for the individual books. (The minute I found such figures for Deathly Hallows I posted them.) Although it is possible that I and all of the other editors of this page have missed some obscure set of references unearthed by the Howsuffworks page editor in 2007, it is extraordinarily unlikely. Far more probable is the simple explanation that Howstuffworks had no source beyond this Knowledge page on a particular day in mid-2007.

193:" Despite these difficulties, the lists offer all kind of interesting and valuable information about books. Anything that is known about bestselling books is useful for what it tells about public taste, reading habits, and trends in bookselling. Also, the titles included on these three lists do rank among the all-time bestsellers and deserve to be acknowledged." Eerily resembling this discussion, but it is a quote from the 1985 Book Publishing Annual 31: 2094:

not printed. Even the citation "The Bible listed here refers to all versions ever printed, many of which have been given away freely, not sold (for example, during missionary work)." contradicts this. If this will be the basis for the article (proven units sold), then the bible should be removed. However, if not, Quotations should be added, as its estimated print/give away etc, may very well be more then that of the bible. Please discuss. (

159:, but so far no one has done the work to improve the list in this way (and in all fairness, usually there is only one estimate, or the estimates are pretty close). As for the distinction between printed / sold / given, the list tries to go with reliable, independent sources indicating sales figures. Whether these are correct is not for us to decide (unless they really appear to be errors), as indicated in 244:(is Wii Sports really a best-selling video game, when it is automatically shipped with the console, and is thus not actually sold but given away?), ... Best-selling books is a popular, often discussed topic, but without one defining authority. We are a reference work, we present what has been written about this in reliable sources, and present it in a comprehensive, unbiased manner, as requested by 213:) offer very different rankings convinces me that we should not attempt to do this. We could report about different rankings, but we can't offer one when there's so much variability. It's OR because, at the end, it's us choosing the works that are included, the sources for the sales, and taking arbitrary decisions on what constitutes a "sale" and what constitutes a "book".-- 1938:

Tale of Two Cities in the which the figure of 200 million was mentioned. I hunted around on the net for other sources and found lots, all quoting 200 million sales and all cut and pasted from Wiki. A while later the source on the lists page changed to the David Mitchell article in the Telegraph that is currently quoted and which itself doesn't quote a source.

1869:.) However, there are a lot of people how just don't care. I corrected it also on this list, placed the correct source but someone undid it afterwards again. So even the 30 million figure seems too high and should be replaced with the 21 million figure from that book edition. I think you can find a lot of wrong figures on this list. -- 3463:

individual novel it could be assumed each novel sold around 41-42 million copies each. Since this is a vague estimate each individual book cannot be listed as standalone until we have their figures. As well the series again cannot be among the over 100 million sales as a standalone novel it would only be considered 42 million sales.

1687:

Bible, Mao's sayings, Mao's poetry, the Qur'an and the unabridged Chinese dictionary (which was given away free quite often and might be classified as a textbook for purposes of this listing) are actually the five most printed books in the world. There are also several others titles with about a 100 million copies printed or more

1755:. Since the more than 25 years that have passed since then, many more books have been written and sold in new millions. According to book sellers like Barnes & Noble, more than 50 million copies have been sold to date: "There are now over 50 million copies of the Destroyer novels in print in 11 languages." Link: 519:

reliable. If we start including reasonable guesses, where do we draw the line? By following Knowledge standards, we have a more incomplete but also more reliable list where it is fairly easy to conclude if an entry is legitimate or not (examples of the contrary, as with the Twilight series, exist of course).

571:

its overwhelming influence on the publishing industry over the last decade or so. Something has to be done about this. I for one, am going to attempt to find citations for the other six books, especially since the oldest of the lot is less than 20 years old, so this information must be available somewhere.

2207:

audience is much broader than the Bible". You would probably argue that I'm soapboxing for the Quotations and so on. The appeal, the audience, the intended message, and so on, are completely irrelevant here. The only things that matter are independently sourced figures, and the discussion if these are

620:

sales figures for the other books. Although you can find various sales figures for those books around the web, it is obvious that they originated from unreliable estimates published on Knowledge and elsewhere. I believe the best estimates available are those shown in this Discussion, a few lines above.

3209:

150 million sales. But if we see it as what it was published (which would only be right since that what people buy) it has reported sales figures of 450 million Books, + 100 million from it's Prequel, the Hobbit. that makes 550 Million alone from the Books published during his Lifetimem and would put

2093:

While I do not disagree with including the bible here on sheer numbers in existence alone, seeing as how Quotations of Chairman Mao was removed, due to the numbers mentioned being numbers PRINTED, this should be as well. It clearly states at the beginning of the article that this is about units sold,

1957:

Two points: first, you are right that the figure seems too high. Second, the lack of other novels by Dickens in this list doesn't mean that none of them sold over 10 million copies, only that for none of them any sources could be found. If we had all information and only correct information, probably

1937:

The sales figure for A Tale of Two Cities is unbelievable, especially as no other Dickens novel – not Great Expectations, not David Copperfield, not A Christmas Carol – features at all in the lists. When I first noticed this anomaly, the sole source was a review of a Broadway musical production of A

1789:

Also, the 83 million copies of She (H. Rider Haggard) that is sold, is based on numbers from the 60s. Not impossible that it is over 100 million these days. It's also most likely that more copies of The Neverending Story has been sold since the source used on this page was published. Just some of the

1587:

Rates for publishing can and have been aggregated relatively reliably for things like the Bible, Qur'an and Mao's Little Red Book because most copies of these have come into existence since the existence of printing and credible record-keeping, especially in the last one or two hundred years. Figures

1394:

Along with this, the only criteria for a book to be on this article is that it sell at least 10 Million copies. The last few books sold more than that in 24 hours. So as long as it can be proven a book sold more than 10 million copies, it should be listed in this table, as it can be proven it belongs

1339:

The rule to "ignore all rules" was created for exactly this purpose. The rule in question is that all content in this encyclopedia needs to be cited to a reliable source. The problem is, this rule makes this page completely worthless. Don Quixiote and the seven Harry Potter books are some of the best

1044:

Regarding the Qu'ran figure, I agree that it is worthless. It is simply a copy of a copy of somebody's guess. Feel free to substitute a reference to a reliable source and correct the entry, re-ranking the item if need be. I have no objection to putting the HP books (aside from Deathly Hallows) in the

502:

Why aren't these figures used in the article? Surely they are reasonable estimates and would remove the confusion caused by only one Harry Potter book being listed and improve completeness. The article makes clear that figures are not necessarily acurate. I changed the article some months ago, but my

252:

since we don't add a ranking or claim any completeness. We don't "advance a position", we present a summary of reliabley sourced, pertinent info. having just reread WP:OR, I don't see how this article fails it. But, if you would like to add a column presenting lower estimates as well (instead of only

3583:

Why is it at all necessary to split these categories into ranges of numbers (50-100 million, 30-50 million, etc.)? It seems arbitrary to me and considering that these numbers are not considered particularly precise anyway, it seems misleading. I propose to consolidate each of the sub-categories into

2733:

Many of them (e.g. comic books) are magazines, not books, making it harder to distinguish between those tw-hat can be included (Tintin, Asterix, Lucky Luke, ...), those that can't (Batman, Spiderman, ...) and those that are more on the fence (most manga). A discussion about whether true comic albums

2231:

We put it back up because the simple fact is the bible sources are also numbers printed, not actually sold. I think the assumption is wither it is churches or the Chinese government, the books are being sold in some form. If that is not the assumption, then both books need to be removed, as they are

2113:

What makes the issue sticky is that Quotations was largely distributed only a few decades ago, yet come claim its copies sold rivals the Bible, parts of which have been around for over 2 millennia. Personally, have over 6 billion people lived and died in China since Quotations was published? If they

2109:

The issue with this list is that there are truly no exact figures for most of these books, especially the Bible due to its sheer age, popularity, distribution methods, and staying power. We must remember that a Bible distributed is purchased by a church, a group, an individual, and given to someone.

1614:

Your list was a 99% duplication of this one (without acknowledgement of it, which is required). It makes no sense to duplicate that much information over two articles, which will then certainly start to grow apart and present two versions of the same topic. You can create a list of those books which

1014:

The probability of a chance match between two random sequences of 21 numbers--when EACH ONE of the 21 numbers has an effectively infinite number of possible values--is zero. It is not simply the ordering of titles that is identical; it is the sales figures themselves. More conservatively, if each of

634:

The problem with the Harry Potter books, it seems, is that the publisher has always preferred to attribute a bulk sales figure to the entire series, rather than ascribe the appropriate sales figure for each particular book. In turn, this has caused confusion, where sometimes the sales figure for the

603:

The source for the 72 million (Baltimore Sun) is indexed in Google News and gives results for that date, but no articles on Harry Potter that day... But any reliable source with figures for worldwide sales of individual HP books is more than welcome, just like a source with sales of Don Quichote and

1686:

Then I probably will just restart the other listing, but only based on the top ten or twenty books listed on this list and let others expand it from there. They may only be a few dozen books excluded from this list, but the copies sold are a great many. For example, I've seen listings show that the

1637:

and just have the other current name redirect here? I would guess that the majority of books on this list are primarily sold rather than given away, so that the figures for books-printed and books-sold would be about the same and not required new citations for each entry - I don't know of any cases

1233:

I disagree. We shouldn't be using any non-independent sources, to avoid all discussions to what is reliable and what isn't. Furthermore, it doesn't make much sense to include books based on US figures alone, which are obviously too low, and which have the result that our individual listings for the

760:

Realistically, the only way a "reliable, independent" source is likely to report a Harry Potter sales figure is by getting information from the publishers and, after due consideration, publishing it with the implication that they believe it is trustworthy. That, after all, is where all of the "more

570:

Also, in regard to how incomplete this entire listing is, should there not be at least a disclaimer to that effect? The Harry Potter series is grossly underestimated given that it accounts for some half-a-billion in sales, yet, as of yet, we have one book, listed at 44 million copies to account for

535:

Sticking to all these standards will almost certainly make several articles remain forever incomplete. Filling the tables with approximations (by the way, the title of the referred coloumn is Approximate sales) and then inserting and linking footnotes will both make the table more complete and keep

518:

These reasonable estimates are original research. Everything in the article is (or should be) sourced to a reliable source. This means that the article is clearly incomplete (see other sctions on this talk page about the lack of Pilgrim's Progress and Don Quixote, for example), but what is there is

346:

If the 400M figure for sales of all Harry Potter books is correct, then each book on average has sold 57M, or 44M if we assume the novelty books sold as much as the main ones. But no individual book has been listed as selling more than 30M copies. The list doesn't claim to be complete, but should

103:

Also, a lot of assumptions that are being made are completely arbitrary. Each the books that are "given" have been "sold" before (to the publisher), and many of the references included are for printed books, not sold. The decisions of what constitutes a series and what not are also arbitrarily made

99:

This list is original research. Even if we accepted that all the different sources referenced were reliable and comparable (and that's a big if), we can't assure that we are not missing books that should be in the list. Therefore, we are presenting a ranking that is not enclyclopedic because it may

2268:

To not include the Bible among "sellers" is simply a recognition that it tops the list each year. To not include it because it is often given away (although purchased first) is silly. Are you excluding all books, novels, and classics that are purchased by schools and force fed to students? They

2206:

Try changing your "the Bible is a message for all people regardless of race, gender, or political regime. In other words, its appeal and audience is much broader than Quotations" to "the Quotations are a message for all people regardless of race, gender, or religion. In other words, its appeal and

2118:

saying Quotations has sold only about 900 million. Lastly, we cannot forget that the Bible is a message for all people regardless of race, gender, or political regime. In other words, its appeal and audience is much broader than Quotations, and further supports the 6 billion figure for the Bible.

1343:

No, I do not have reliable sales figures for the Harry Potter books, or Don Quixiote, and I will not make them up. I am going to make a special section for books that are known to be on this list, but do not have reliable sales figure information. This section will have a note making it abundantly

647:

Why is it better to add original research for this one series, and not for anything else? We should stick to what is reported in reliable sources, not make an exception for a book series with a large fan base. There are many other books and series missing where we know for sure that they should be

642:

That being said, this problem is not unsolvable, at least in my view. We know the lowest possible sales figure for any of the books is 44 million (and this is probably a gross underestimation since the books continue to sale at a brisk pace). We also know that is it unlikely that any single one of

3254:

Actually, LotR is just a case in point of a larger issue: The term "volume" is simply misleading. LotR is not the only book that was published in different formats over its lifetime. For example, a lot of Dickens' works was published as serials, on their own or in magazines. That does not fit the

2545:

While TOTAL sales of books has a certain level of validity, it does NOT, in a historical sense represent influence as reflected by sales over the long term. A similar list - very hard/laborious/difficult to compile, granted - which shows sales in proportion to population could be of great value.

2373:

I've readded Simenon, with the 853 million copies source, and an older source that claimed 550 million for Maigret. Please, unsigned IP, explain how Simenon sold 1.4 billion novels if his most famous and prolific creation, Maigret, only sold 80 million? This is self-contradictory. It is much more

1831:

There seems to have been confusion here. Careful reading of the back cover of the paperback edition of the Alchemist seems to clear up the misunderstanding, for 65 million copies of ALL of the author's books had been sold by the printing of that edition of that book. According to the author's own

1750:

Considering that the Destroyer series has sold tens of millions copies, it should be on the list. But where do you find reliable numbers? There is an article from 19885 saying "Remo, the hero of more than sixty action-adventure paperbacks that have sold over 25 million copies, comes to the screen

1380:

The Harry Potter series has sold 450 Million books, which includes, at most, 10 books. The policy on No original research says that routine calculations are acceptable. This means that each book sold, on average, at least 45 Million copies (although it should be noted that the 7 main series books

883:

It is not the other way around. You can do the same thing that I did--go back to the history archives for this page and follow the day-by-day changes in 2007 to observe the continuous shifts in figures for one entry after the other. You will see that only for a very brief period do all the top 21

643:

the books has crossed over 100 million in sales. So I believe the other six books should be listed in the 50-100 million section, written thus: ~ 50 to 100 million. This is a temporary measure that should be adopted until we get more exact figures, and is better than not listing the books at all.

619:

The 72 million figure was simply wrong, and a rather bizarre claim at that. It was disseminated just a few days after the book went on sale without any substantiation. The official publisher's figure of 44 million came many months later. I don't know why the publishers have not released worldwide

598:

I agree that these books have to be included. They have been the most successful and influential books of the 21st century and among the most successful and influential of all time, so omitting them is unnacceptable. The original is one of the best selling books of all time, with an estimated 120

551:

Even an approximation needs a reliable source, and neither Knowledge nor original research are acceptable sources according to Knowledge rules. We're just trying to follow the rules and be consistent about it. Incompleteness is unavoidable given the constraints of the rules, and given the lack of

2413:

Why hasn't Middle Earth been added as a best-selling series? Combining the sales of both The Hobbit and The Lord of the rings the sales of the series is more than 250 million. I am saying this from the sales figures of both books from this article itself. Even though it does not include sales of

2354:

Thanks. There are many books and series that should have an entry here, but which don't have reliable independent sales figures. I tis hard to get this list complete and reliable at the same time, and for the moment we have chosen to have an incomplete but reliable list. But the more complete it

1941:

Does it seem at all reasonable to anyone that a Dickens novel, most of which were originally published in serial form in newspapers has sold 50 million more copies than any other book and at least 190 million more than any of his other works? Doesn't it seem more likely that the original source

1704:

Sales figures and print figures may differ sometimes, but I don't imagine very much in most cases on this list. If there are 200 copies of a particular title that were sold over time, for example, I don't imagine that there would be even 10% in reserve. A book that was rapidly printed and widely

905:

However, I have a more direct basis for my assertion. I have been editing this page myself since 2007 and monitoring it since well before that time. I have had a specific interest in the Harry Potter books and have attempted to follow up each and every reference to sales figures for them, trying

848:

How do you know? It might have been the other way round, or both "Howstuffworks" and the 2007 Knowledge editor used a third source. (Note that the old Knowledge article you link to has 4 entries in the "Top 20" that are not in the HSW table (the places 5 to 7 which do not have numbers given, and

282:

make decisions about what is and what is not a reliable source; those decisions constitute editing, not research. Such decisions are always subject to discussion on this page and many, many such discussions have occurred. Decisions are not made "arbitrarily," particularly in those very few cases

170:

was also nominated for deletion as being OR, and was kept as being a compilation based on reliable sources. The incompleteness of the list is the main reason that we don't add numbers to the list, we don't want to conclude that X is the 6th bestselling book of all time: but we do need to offer a

3462:

The entire series was put as a standalone book in the over 100 million section, with a note saying (published as a series). Since unlike lord of the rings or other examples each book was written as a separate novel, I have removed it from that list. Since there is no figure for the sale of each

2117:

In the end, I see copies distributed for the Bible, and copies forced upon for Quotations, to render each a moot point. I support adding Quotations, but at the 900 million copies sold mark. There are simply too little sources supporting 6 billion copies sold for Quotations, and too many sources

1135:

On second thought, I think I will remove the need for "independent" sources from the intro and add the first six HP books with the above Scholastic figures as a lower limit. We agreed above that the Scholastic press release is a reliable source, and I see no reason why this article should have

277:

This article is not Original Research since every item cites a published source that was judged to be reliable: "To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are both directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the

2183:

And Fram, I'm not sure if you were referring to my last post regarding soapboxing, but if so, I'm citing the Bible's worldwide influence and audience of the Bible as support of its numbers sold, not to endorse its message. If that's what you're referring to, that's more oversensitivity toward

1289:

We can not assume that all HP books printed by 2007 were sold because we have no basis for such an assumption; books remain on store shelves even without reported reprintings, and we have no information about what percentage were actually sold. On the related issue, I must say that I consider

2689: 2683: 2269:

are purchased...and given away. Do you exclude library purchases? And I very much doubt that the children reading Harry Potter, or Goosebumps are purchasing these books themselves... so the 'gifting' of a book is a big part of what makes any of them part of the "sellers" list at all.

2686: 712:

of the number of copies, I think Scholastic is a valid source. And the US figures show that the HP books belong to this list, so they should be present. Just add "more than" or "at least" (or "US alone") to the numbers so that readers are aware that the "real" numbers are still higher.

235:

Z. In most cases, it is very obvious that it is a book and not something else (like a magazine or a CD), and if a reliable source claims the number are sales figures and not print figures, then that should be good enough for us. The problems you list are also applicable to

2114:

each got a copy (some forced to), would that justify over 6 billion copies? The current population of China is estimated at about 900 million right now. I just don't think it adds up, and I consider the estimate of a billion copies sold for Quotations to be more accurate.

1357:

I've added a further disclaimer that the page is incomplete and missing some books that obviously would be included if only we had reliable sources for them. Now, how do you propse to make these "gross estimates" for these books? Please make sure that you don't violate

1810: 1045:"lack of reliable sources" section, but the reference to Howstuffworks should be omitted. Rest assured that the very same day a genuinely reliable source of sales figures for any one of the remaining 6 HP books appears anywhere, it will be reflected on this page. 2144:

I agree that both should be included, or neither. I also agree that 5 or 6 billion for the "Quotations" seems a highly dubious figure. But please don't continue with your soapboxing in your last lines, it is utterly irrelevant. And the current population of the

104:

by the article's editors. And when two sources ofer different information, the higher amount is chosen with no critical analysis. Seriously: if we can't find a reputed source with a comprehensive list of the best-selling books, this article should not exist.--

194: 1323:

It seems that Associated Press has directly quoted Neil Blair, spokesman for Christopher Little Literary Agency (agent for J.K. Rowling), as saying that "about 450 million copies" of the Harry Books have been sold. On that basis, I will update the figures.

944:

be a (erroneous) Knowledge mirror, but it may also be a coincidence. Given the hundreds of different versions of this article over time it's not too unlikely that one of these has 21 (of 22+3 without numbers) entries identical. May I suggest two possible

1916:

This article usually takes the highest figure from reliable sources, unless it is really clearly a typo or figure of speech. For the Alchemist, we have figures going from 20 million to 100 million, so there is no reason not to use the 65 million figure.

184: 566:

In regard to the final book of the series, I note that one of the linked sources to its sales figures states that the book has sold over 72 million copies (footnote #35). Is there a specific reason the lower sales figure is listed (i.e., 44 million)?

253:

the higher one we have now), feel free to do so. I have suggested this in earlier discussions as well, but no one so far was willing to do the legwork. Note though that the fact that an article needs improvement is not an accepted reason for deletion.

817:

Unfortunately, this is not a reliable source. In fact, these figures were lifted directly from an old version of this same Knowledge page (without attribution), as can be seen by comparing the version of this page from 20:20 on 31 March 2007 here:

1583:

deleted and redirected to the current page? The reason why I made it is because the only real justification for excluding religious and political books from this List of best-selling books is that they are usually given away rather than sold.

3563:

It is a bit to provide only a russian sales figure and ranking based on that. At least in the Tolstoi case, i'd guess the international sales probably double the russian figure or at least their inclusion will lead to a significantly higher

2567: 1182:

There's another problem: the press release mentions books printed, not necessarily sold. But I think we can safely assume that all HP books printed until 2007 will be sold by now, at least for the first six books. Does someone disagree?

1958:

four or five books by Dickens would be in this list, and Two Cities wouldn't be at the top with 200 million, but lower down with X million. But it's either going with the sources, or adding our own guesses... 12:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

536:

clear the fact that those numbers are assumptions. Imho, paradoxes like these are much more important to avoid (for the sake of consistency) than some extra footnotes regarding uncertainty. Please feel free to express disagreement. --

2826:. As wikipedia said, "A book is a set of written, printed, illustrated, or blank sheets, made of ink, paper, parchment, or other materials, usually fastened together to hinge at one side.". I don't see why it shouldn't be included. 1864:

about the book as well I subsequently replaced the figure (down to 30 million copies) in the article, explaining on the talk page that the wrong figure is referring to an error in an AFP-article. (Read the section on the talk page

1670:

Because the vast majority of sources are about best-selling books, about sales figures, not about print figures. We shouldn't change a page title to accommodate a few books that otherwise wouldn't fit in it. 07:02, 5 July 2012

1990:

One entry quotes 60 million copies, from its 2012 source, while the other quotes 40 million from its 2011 source. 20 million in a year. Clearly the series should only be in the list once. Which is the more reliable source?

1759:. Also Amazon use the same numbers: "Murphy is probably best known for the Destroyer series, which he created with the late Dick Sapir, and which has produced 150 books with worldwide sales of over 50 million copies." Link 1647:

I guess I could just create a list of most-printed political and religious books separately from this, but it seems like it would be more convenient for people looking into this just to have it all together on one list.

2179:

Quotations is back on there as it was before, cited at 6.5 billion copies PRINTED, not sold. I agree with including it on the list at about 1 billion, but now it's back to square one. Did someone else post it back up?

2773:

seem to be very much a gray area but, as with some of the other excluded categories that have ambiguous or incomplete sales data, it would be extremely difficult to maintain consistency if any of them are included.

2005:

I think the 60 million is talking about international sales, while the 40 million is only United States sales. Can't be sure though about the 40 million. Try finding a third source which verifies one number of the

2858:

was the highest selling novel in the world (he may have meant that year). He was prone to getting his facts wrong, but can anyone find a reliable source for how many copies Ayn Rand's books have sold in total?

2252:

figures so there should no longer be a dispute. (For the Bible, I could only verify the first reference given (for 2.5 billion copies); in case the second is only about print numbers, it should be removed IMO.)

2484:, released an additional 26 Land of Oz books. That is a total of 40 books, with many of them being quite popular. I have no information or sources, but I would assume that the series would fit the criteria. 2962: 2682:

If we need to have a section on "in the media" for this talk page, then instead of a seemingly random blog, we can include quite a few other more reliable media, like "How to Write a Book That Sells You"

776:

Okay, I did not notice the sentence from the intro. But then the word "Claims" in the subchapter titles should be removed - reliable and independent sources are not usually called "claims" on Knowledge.

154:

Note that "incomplete" doesn't mean "original research", and that the list explicitly indicates that it is incomplete. I have previously suggested to include both lower and higher estimates, as I did on

1615:

are explcitly excluded from this one, or we can discuss whether adding a fourth section to this page (apart from books, series, and regularly updated books) would be the better and easier solution.

3529: 163:: verifiability, not truth. The division between series vs. single books is pretty clearcut in the vast majority of cases, only the Tolkien books are a problem in that regard as far as I am aware. 2662: 795:(already used in the article for Qu'ran figures, so apparently a reliable source) The numbers given there seem reasonable to me. So I think we can now add the first six HP books to the article.-- 409:

These add up to 140 million. Multiplying each of these by 2.5 (to get the announced worldwide total of at least 350 million), we could get reasonably good estimates for each of the seven titles.

739:

The intro to the article states "The books are listed according to the highest sales estimate as reported in reliable, independent sources." Scholastic is reliable but clearly not independent.

822:

It was some time later that we first eliminated all unsourced figures from this page. The sales figures shown on this page and reprinted by the "howstuffworks" site are therefore not reliable.

2655:

That's stupid and not neutral, please include every religious books, as far as the number of sells are in the top list. PLEASE REVERSE THE SILLY SUPPRESSION OF BIBLE AND QURAN IN THIS LIST;

2437:

Google confirms in about a million places the book sold at least 30M copies. Can't seem to nail down a solid wikipedia quality source, be that is sold most of the books before the internet.

1347:

If someone has a problem with this, let me know. But I can't stand by and do nothing while what is normally a perfectly reasonable rule is making this page a complete waste of server space.

361:

One possible approach is to note the number of in-print copies of the U.S. editions, and then estimate the worldwide total from these numbers. Scholastic Publishers report the following: (

166:

In the end, the only serious problem I see with the list is that, indeed, many books that should be on it are missing. We try to correct this, and improve the list all the time. E.g. the

2021:

Thanks, I've removed the lower estimate, since that is older and the list (arbitrarily) goes with the highest reliable estimate in all cases (excluding obvious mistakes or hyperbole).

1515:

Dickens' "A Tale of Two Cities" sells 200 million copies, but "Great Expectations" doesn't even sell 10 million? Anyone got a source that would at least put Expectations on the list?

1234:

HP books will not add up by far to the overall 400 million total. Internal consistency in a list is a good thing, and using the Scholastic figures will diminish said consistency.

1385:

original research). However, the first 4 books have sold a combined 200 Million copies, which means they will appear somewhere on this list, although exactly where is not clear.

2563: 2215:(and given away or forced to people). Why any book or series on this list has a a large circulation is not relevant, nor whether any book deserves it more than another. 312:

According to BBC, Lady Chatterley's Lover "sold two million copies, outselling even the Bible." I find the Bible part to be arguable but I notice it's not in the list.

2635:

Oh, Hinduism is no longer a major religion then? Only a billion adherents, third largest religion in the world, nah, that's not really major of course... Please check

2607:

Please do not include any other Religious books other than Bible and Quran because there are many religions in the world and we are considering only major religions.

639:, which is usually given as 120 million copies, when this is actually the sales figure of the entire series at the time the first movie, on the first book, came out. 3358: 3354: 3340: 3091: 3087: 3073: 1493:

First and third done, not certain about the second. Small chance that any book has exactly 100 million copies, so it's not as if the current title is wrong.

976:

However, for consistency, the Qu'ran has to be given the same "status" as the HP books, since it is also based solely on the same Howstuffworks reference. --

648:

included somewhere (Maigret and Poirot, Don Quixote, The Count of Monte Cristo, ...). We can create a list of books we think should be included but aren't

3213:

And yes, the LotR was published as a Sequel to the Hobbit, just like every HP book was published as a Sequel, so that should also count for the Hobbit.

3481:

article on the book (which see). My personal copy of the paperback novel (2011) states "over 100 million copies sold." The second novel in the series,

2875: 227:

Well, the Time one is from 1968, so that can explain some of the differences ;-). Apart from that, we report that according to source X, author Y has

86: 81: 76: 64: 59: 3169:

Judging by the lack of response, I'm going to assume that everyone else has realized that you were wrong too, but were not nice enough to tell you.

3528:

It will soon be the third-best-selling manga ever, and if we're keeping manga on this "book" list (they are there now)... Naruto should be included.

1588:

show that these and other political and religious books are very widely printed and would be on this list if it were a list of most-printed books.

171:

reliable checklist as a counterweight to all the newspaper sources claiming that X or Y is the bestselling novel of all time. Note also that there

2110:

Technically it's sold, but the distribution is not conventional (for example, the person who has it didn't necessarily buy it in a bookstore).

686:

Scholastic is not an independent source, it's the publisher. And I'ld rather not include figures than include hugely incomplete (US only) ones.

1599:

so that it can include other figures that people might be interested in when they look for a list of books by distribution or copies in print.

2751:

Due to the controversy maybe there should be a separate list, but somehow compare them and have links from each to the other. How about that?

1467:

the "More than 100 million copies" and "No reliable sales figures" table are the only ones with a "genre" column - no obvious reason for that.

3191: 2448: 237: 3430: 3256: 3154: 2294: 2191: 1560: 322: 156: 2526: 2074: 1992: 1764: 1535: 1516: 948:

a) to add the HP books with that particular reference to the list, but clearly noting that it may be an unreliable Knowledge mirror, or

3533: 2982: 1812:

It looks to be a good source to expand this list, including as far as I can tell figures for e.g. some individual Harry Potter novels.

1470:

should not first table be "At least 100 million copies"? What about the subsequent headings? Perhaps there is a WP standard for such?

3464: 3220: 2666: 1791: 1419: 587: 3509:

Best Seller list at number three. In the UK the novel sold over two million copies." I would say that your list is badly out of date.

2796: 2270: 2048: 537: 428: 3184:

I think it is listed as a single volume because Tolkein wrote it as a single book, and then it was made into 3 books to publish.

635:

entire series has been confused as the one for a single book. The most obvious example of this is the sales figure often given to

2623: 2133: 668:

The first six HP books should at least be included with the American sales figures given above, which are all above 10 million.--

241: 3235:

I would hate the see the Lord of the Rings taken off the list, but I find a consistency problem when the article for the novel,

1751:

October 11 in Remo: The Adventure Begins , one of the most elaborately promoted movies in the history of Orion Pictures." Link:

47: 17: 3051: 2904:

Chances are Wiliam Buckley was talking just plain nonsense here (probably to a typical of ideological wishful thinking).--

2636: 313: 1752: 441:

That's correct, so that would imply a multiplicative factor of approximately 2.9, which would yield the following sales:

2692: 1809:

Has anyone (access to) a copy of the book "Media of Mass Communication" by John Vivian? (A recent edition, 2011 or 2012)

3239:, on this very site, consistently defines it as a 3 volume novel. It was published as such, therefore it is as such.-- 951:

b) to only add them under the "lack of reliable sources" section, again with mentioning the possibly unreliable source.

2399: 1848: 1756: 3041: 2748:

Comics are not books. Comic sales should be in a separate page. (November 31, 2009, by alias: Bob Dole Fan Page Guy)

488:

is close to the recently reported total sales figure of 44 million, so these estimates might be reasonably accurate.

180: 3278: 3013: 2813: 2302: 1977: 1894: 1866: 38: 3447: 2990: 2970: 2590: 1534:

When organizing by "number of installments" the lists treat 1 and 10 and 100 as equal numbers. 1,10,2,27,33,4,...

124: 3357:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3090:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1473:

the wikilinking of languages is highly inconsistent and of little utility - better with none in a table context.

3426: 3260: 3195: 2896: 2317: 2258: 2195: 1188: 1141: 1096: 981: 858: 800: 792: 782: 718: 673: 167: 3306: 3158: 2298: 2293:

says that he sold 225 million copies. Can anyone find a breakdown of how many sales were Mike Hammer titles?

1782:

Quote from the net: "The Count of Monte Cristo” is estimated to have exceeded 200 million copies sold". Link:

1564: 326: 2798: 2696: 2530: 2056: 1768: 1539: 3468: 2370:

His Maigret novels sold EIGHTY million not 800; however his total single novel sales reached 1.4 billion. .

2078: 1996: 1520: 1423: 583: 330: 2274: 541: 508: 3224: 3174: 2779: 2619: 2462: 2237: 2167: 2099: 1795: 1329: 1295: 1050: 911: 827: 766: 625: 557: 493: 414: 288: 1344:

clear these figures are gross estimates, and only used to put these books on the page where they belong.

3396: 3376:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3364: 3236: 3129: 3109:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3097: 2864: 2801: 2489: 2052: 1412:

10 millions sales? it's ludicrous..since mid 50s in italy we study it at school...eveybody must buy it

432: 352: 2775: 2551: 1947: 1760: 1731:

I believe that it should be on the list but I need help trying to find how many books have been sold --

1325: 1291: 1046: 907: 823: 820:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_best-selling_books&direction=next&oldid=118946832

762: 621: 579: 553: 489: 410: 362: 284: 504: 348: 3444: 3418: 3331: 3216: 3187: 3150: 2987: 2967: 2658: 2615: 2611: 2587: 2522: 2419: 2344: 2329: 2187: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2070: 2044: 1965: 1836: 1556: 1481: 1415: 575: 318: 3593: 3573: 3552: 3537: 3518: 3472: 3453: 3434: 3404: 3264: 3248: 3228: 3199: 3178: 3162: 3137: 2952: 2937: 2913: 2899: 2886: 2868: 2835: 2817: 2783: 2760: 2743: 2727: 2708: 2670: 2648: 2627: 2576: 2555: 2534: 2508: 2493: 2466: 2423: 2383: 2364: 2348: 2333: 2278: 2262: 2241: 2224: 2199: 2171: 2162:

Well, seems like we all agree it at least should be at the billion mark, and included on the list.

2156: 2137: 2103: 2082: 2030: 2015: 2000: 1951: 1926: 1910: 1878: 1852: 1821: 1799: 1772: 1740: 1732: 1714: 1657: 1624: 1608: 1568: 1543: 1524: 1502: 1485: 1453: 1427: 1399: 1371: 1351: 1333: 1299: 1243: 1192: 1145: 1100: 1054: 985: 915: 862: 831: 804: 786: 770: 748: 722: 695: 677: 661: 629: 613: 591: 561: 545: 528: 512: 497: 436: 418: 356: 292: 262: 222: 204: 145: 131: 113: 3510: 3422: 2892: 2254: 2248:

In case someone still reads this discussion: Now both the Bible and the Quotations have referenced

2089:

Removing bible from top of list, or adding Quotations of Chairman Mao, printed or proven units sold

1736: 1553:

Yes ... the design is clearly needed to be changed :) The dark green color would fit perfectly xD

1184: 1137: 1092: 977: 854: 796: 778: 714: 669: 249: 2547: 1943: 176: 3514: 3244: 2948: 2933: 2756: 2723: 2444: 2433:

Not listed in this list, sold between 30 and 35 million copies, if Knowledge is to be believed:

2339:

I have now entered Simenon in the "series" table, after checking some more statistical records.--

1396: 1348: 3361:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3094:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1840: 1706: 1649: 1600: 3377: 3110: 2041:

On it's own wikipedia page "Uncle Tom's Cabin was the best-selling novel of the 19th century"

1902: 1870: 3589: 3288: 3170: 3023: 2831: 2572: 2233: 2163: 2095: 1449: 1790:

stuff that should have been updated, if it was only possible to find the information needed.

1783: 3569: 3414:

The series is included in the list, but for some reason, none of the standalone books are.

3392: 3125: 2909: 2860: 2485: 2011: 3384: 3117: 2877:, so not enough to be included, never mind being "the highest selling novel in the world". 3296: 3031: 2823: 2458: 2415: 2340: 2325: 2290: 1844: 1710: 1653: 1604: 1477: 245: 2562:

Honestly I think we already cover that with the many articles we have along the lines of

2481: 1439: 3052:

https://web.archive.org/20080212104619/http://www.zoshindo.co.jp:80/Gakusan/syoudocA.htm

3548: 3343:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3076:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2882: 2855: 2739: 2704: 2644: 2504: 2379: 2360: 2220: 2184:

religion on your part, but if you're talking about another comment, then that's fine.

2152: 2026: 1973: 1922: 1906: 1874: 1817: 1620: 1498: 1367: 1239: 850: 744: 691: 657: 609: 524: 314:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/10/newsid_2965000/2965194.stm

258: 200: 3383:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3210:

him in the Palce he deseveres, above Rowling, on Top of the best selling Series list.

3116:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

188: 3240: 2944: 2929: 2752: 2719: 2477: 2440: 1890: 1861: 210: 120: 3477:

The single novel is listed as having sold 125 million copies as of June 2015 in the

2499:

Probably, but we need a reliable source to include it, otherwise we start guessing.

424: 3585: 2827: 2788: 1445: 1359: 218: 141: 109: 3042:

https://web.archive.org/20071207214907/http://www.rjmlicensing.com:80/clients.html

2400:

http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2007/nov/02/noadjectivesnecessarysimeno

1381:

would average higher than this, and the 3 spin-offs would average lower, but this

3055: 2928:

Hmm, something is really wrong with this list, AC has sold over 4 BILLION books.

1860:

I agree with you, Jonw. When I found the wrong figure (65 million copies) in the

3565: 3350: 3083: 2905: 2766: 2007: 1705:

demanded for a little while, like the Da Vinci code, might be a rare exception.

1591:

If the list was deleted because it was too similar to this one, then maybe this

160: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3349:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3082:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2568:

Publishers Weekly list of bestselling novels in the United States in the 1920s

2414:

other Middle-Earth books, it is still one of the highest-selling book series.

209:

The fact that the three sources you quote (Time, GUardian and PW, and I'd add

1087:

Unfortunately, I don't have a reliable source for Qu'ran numbers. So I'd ask

136:

Sure. I'd just wanted to hear any arguments you might have here beforehand.--

3544: 3543:

No manga should be on this book list, if any are included it is by mistake.

2878: 2792: 2770: 2735: 2700: 2640: 2500: 2375: 2356: 2216: 2148: 2022: 1969: 1918: 1813: 1616: 1494: 1363: 1235: 793:

http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/21-best-selling-books-of-all-time.htm

740: 687: 653: 605: 520: 254: 196: 3307:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110910141720/http://www.bigtent.tv/dragon.html

3255:

term "volume" at all. Please find some other means of expressing the idea.-

3045: 3147:

The Lord of the Rings is listed here as a single volume. Clearly, false.

2321: 3293:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

3028:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

2480:

authored 14 books in the series, and after Baum's death, his publisher,

2434: 2691:. If we want to include random blogs, then we should also mention e.g. 791:

Done. BTW, I found a reference for individual Harry Potter book sales:

214: 137: 105: 2734:(not magazines like the comic books) should be included is maybe due. 3205:

My only Problem here is, of we see the LotR as a single Book, it has

3310: 2822:

The current table include even 连环画铁道游击队 which are in the format of

2316:

books sold, I think he should remembered somehow... Some statistics

2067:

Is this because no data had been collected from Indian publishers?

363:

http://www.scholastic.com/aboutscholastic/news/press_08022007_CP.htm

1463:

Looks as if the tables need a "consistency edit". In particular,

3442:

Do you have the figures for the individual volumes? All the best:

3301:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

3036:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

2063:

Why is no Hindi or other Indic languages book present in the list?

189:

http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.17/common/images/button_sig.png

2718:

Why are comics excluded from this list? Are they not books too?

1805:

Good source for individual Harry Potter books and perhaps others

599:

million sales, so we must act to include these in this article.

3524:

If anyone cares about keep the various manga up to date: Naruto

3501:, the third novel in the trilogy, was released in 2012 and its 25: 1757:

BARNES & NOBLE | Slave Safari by Murphy, Speaking Volumes

3316:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

3061:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

2603:

Do Not include any other Religious books than Bible andQuran

1832:

site, 21 million copies of "The Alchemist" have been sold.

1438:

it had sold 65 million copies world wild according to BBC

423:

Harry Potter has sold at least 400 million check the link (

2374:

likely that the "80 million" is a typo for "800 million".

175:

reputed sources with comparable comprehensive lists, e.g.

119:

If you think that, then you should take this rationale to

3497:

to be #11 on the Top 100 Bestselling Books of All Time."

3277:

I have just added archive links to one external link on

1395:

on this page, but it cannot be proven where it belongs.

3282: 3017: 3012:

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

2454: 1889:

Once again. The figure of sold copies (65 million) for

940:

I'm still not quite convinced. I agree "Howstuffworks"

819: 2428: 1136:

stricter inclusion rules than Knowledge in general. --

3410:

Why is 50 Shades of Grey not considered in this list?

652:, but we should not include these in the main list. 3353:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3086:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2564:

The New York Times Non-Fiction Best Sellers of 2013

2429:

Wayne Dyer's Your Erroneous Zones 30-35M not listed

1942:

miscopied thousand as million or something similar?

3489:article (which see): "The novel reached #2 on the 425:http://www.thebookseller.com/news/61161-page.html 369:Harry Potter books in print in the U.S. by title: 2147:] is closer to 1.3 billion than to 900 million. 1091:to add one or remove the Qu'ran from the list.-- 3339:This message was posted before February 2018. 3072:This message was posted before February 2018. 3056:http://www.zoshindo.co.jp/Gakusan/syoudocA.htm 1633:Why not just change the title of this list to 3579:Stratification into various ranges necessary? 2457:. Other references are welcome. Greetings, -- 8: 3505:article (which see) states that it "entered 2435:http://en.wikipedia.org/Your_Erroneous_Zones 2854:William Buckley said on Charlie Rose that 2656: 347:any notice be made of this inconsistency? 465:Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix 393:Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix 3584:one list for each category. Thoughts? -- 3046:http://www.rjmlicensing.com/clients.html 637:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone 455:Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 383:Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 3530:2605:E000:2384:BA00:6478:4966:40B7:EF67 2392: 450:Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 378:Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 3493:best seller list and is considered by 3143:Lord of the Rings -- Not Single Volume 2663:2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:C581:CB6B:6A94:89A4 1784:Top Ten Best-Selling Books of All Time 470:Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince 398:Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3328:to let others know (documentation at 2409:Middle-Earth Legendarium as a series? 445:Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone 373:Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone 278:material as presented." Editors must 238:List of best-selling albums worldwide 7: 1727:Percy Jackson series by Rick Riordan 604:many other classics we are missing. 475:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 403:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 157:List of best-selling fiction authors 2791:sold 400 million books world wide. 708:Since the article explicitly notes 460:Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 388:Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 2891:I had the same question, thanks!-- 24: 3311:http://www.bigtent.tv/dragon.html 3281:. Please take a moment to review 3016:. Please take a moment to review 1893:is wrong. Read about the reasons 552:reliable sources for this topic. 2795:sold 200 million books in Japan. 481:(These add up to 406 million.) 242:List of best-selling video games 29: 1986:Jack Reacher series is in twice 18:Talk:List of best-selling books 3179:22:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 2519:the article no longer exists 2285:Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer? 2232:both going on print numbers. ( 2083:18:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC) 2057:09:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC) 1530:List do not organize correctly 1300:17:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1244:10:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC) 1193:16:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 662:06:58, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 630:18:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 614:14:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 592:17:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 529:11:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 513:10:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 3473:05:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC) 3405:11:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC) 3200:04:19, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 2953:20:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 2836:20:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC) 2784:05:57, 25 December 2010 (UTC) 2685:, "The Anthropology of Magic" 2671:12:31, 27 November 2014 (UTC) 2637:List of religious populations 2596:02:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC). 2577:20:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2556:16:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 2424:17:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC) 2384:08:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 2303:20:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 1400:16:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1372:08:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 1352:04:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC) 771:08:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC) 749:13:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 723:13:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 696:20:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC) 678:18:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC) 503:alteration has been removed. 3265:12:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 3138:15:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 2914:03:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC) 2874:"More than 7 million copies" 2818:03:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC) 2761:21:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 2744:08:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 2728:16:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC) 2709:20:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC) 2467:10:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 2355:gets, the better of course. 2284: 1927:08:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC) 1911:19:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1879:19:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC) 1853:18:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 1822:09:32, 11 October 2012 (UTC) 1428:12:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 3454:02:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 2365:08:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 2349:15:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 2334:14:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 2279:20:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC) 2263:15:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 2037:Where is Uncle Tom's Cabin? 1800:22:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 1761:Amazon's Warren Murphy Page 1146:15:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 331:14:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 95:This page should be deleted 3609: 3553:07:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 3538:06:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC) 3519:21:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC) 3370:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3299:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 3279:List of best-selling books 3274:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3163:22:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 3103:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3034:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 3014:List of best-selling books 3009:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2996:01:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC). 2976:01:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC). 2887:06:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 2869:22:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC) 2649:09:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 2628:19:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC) 2585:population? All the best: 2546:Other people's thoughts? 1952:10:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC) 1773:00:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 1635:List of most-printed books 1597:List of most-printed books 1593:List of best-selling books 1581:List of most-printed books 1575:List of most-printed books 1544:23:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 1503:07:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 1486:21:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 1454:13:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 1055:00:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC) 986:16:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 916:06:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 863:12:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 832:04:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 562:02:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 546:18:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 342:Harry Potter inconsistency 231:a number of copies of the 3435:14:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC) 3249:00:12, 24 July 2013 (UTC) 2938:15:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC) 2541:Legitimacy of TOTAL sales 2535:01:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC) 2509:06:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC) 2494:15:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC) 2242:15:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2225:19:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 2200:19:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC) 2104:01:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC) 2031:06:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC) 2016:22:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 2001:20:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 1778:The Count of Monte Cristo 1741:09:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 1525:06:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC) 1444:i hope you will add it.-- 1334:16:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC) 1101:18:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC) 805:16:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 787:14:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 498:04:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 437:23:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 3594:14:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC) 3574:23:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC) 3229:11:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2900:00:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC) 2449:03:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 2308:...and where is Simenon? 2172:13:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2157:07:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 2138:02:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC) 1715:00:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 1658:00:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 1625:06:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 1609:22:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 1569:16:31, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 419:05:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 357:02:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 293:06:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC) 263:10:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 223:09:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 205:07:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 168:List of important operas 146:07:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 132:16:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 114:14:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 3270:External links modified 3005:External links modified 1753:Heroes We Don't Deserve 303:Lady Chatterley's Lover 2473:The Land of Oz series? 2036: 1459:Tables and wikilinking 853:" which does have). -- 650:here, on the talk page 127:— Bill william compton 3237:The Lord of the Rings 302: 42:of past discussions. 3351:regular verification 3285:. If necessary, add 3084:regular verification 3069:to let others know. 3020:. If necessary, add 2289:The main article on 1933:A Tale Of Two Cities 1897:on the talk page of 1746:The Destroyer series 121:article for deletion 3485:, as stated in its 3483:Fifty Shades Darker 3341:After February 2018 3320:parameter below to 3074:After February 2018 3065:parameter below to 2714:Comics not included 1434:"Millennium series" 3507:The New York Times 3499:Fifty Shades Freed 3346:InternetArchiveBot 3079:InternetArchiveBot 2769:such as those for 1595:should be renamed 1511:Great Expectations 248:. We don't do any 3457: 3438: 3421:comment added by 3403: 3371: 3219:comment added by 3190:comment added by 3165: 3153:comment added by 3136: 3104: 2997: 2977: 2673: 2661:comment added by 2631: 2614:comment added by 2597: 2581:In proportion to 2525:comment added by 2202: 2190:comment added by 2140: 2124:comment added by 2073:comment added by 2047:comment added by 1982: 1968:comment added by 1856: 1839:comment added by 1579:Why was the page 1559:comment added by 1418:comment added by 1408:La divina cmmedia 1362:when doing this. 595: 578:comment added by 321:comment added by 185:Publishers Weekly 92: 91: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3600: 3452: 3437: 3415: 3399: 3398:Talk to my owner 3394: 3369: 3368: 3347: 3335: 3300: 3292: 3231: 3202: 3148: 3132: 3131:Talk to my owner 3127: 3102: 3101: 3080: 3035: 3027: 2995: 2975: 2965:. All the best: 2810: 2809: 2806:Globalphilosophy 2630: 2608: 2595: 2575: 2537: 2515:source 9 is gone 2482:Reilly & Lee 2402: 2397: 2185: 2119: 2085: 2059: 1981: 1962: 1855: 1833: 1571: 1430: 594: 572: 333: 129: 128: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3581: 3561: 3526: 3416: 3412: 3402: 3397: 3362: 3355:have permission 3345: 3329: 3294: 3286: 3272: 3214: 3192:148.167.217.120 3185: 3145: 3135: 3130: 3095: 3088:have permission 3078: 3029: 3021: 3007: 2926: 2924:Agatha Christie 2852: 2803: 2802: 2716: 2680: 2609: 2605: 2571: 2543: 2520: 2517: 2475: 2431: 2411: 2406: 2405: 2398: 2394: 2310: 2291:Mickey Spillane 2287: 2091: 2068: 2065: 2042: 2039: 1988: 1963: 1935: 1887: 1834: 1829: 1807: 1780: 1748: 1729: 1577: 1554: 1551: 1549:Web site design 1532: 1513: 1461: 1436: 1413: 1410: 573: 486:Deathly Hallows 484:The figure for 344: 316: 305: 126: 125: 100:be incomplete. 97: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3606: 3604: 3580: 3577: 3560: 3559:russian novels 3557: 3556: 3555: 3525: 3522: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3423:Electricmaster 3411: 3408: 3395: 3389: 3388: 3381: 3314: 3313: 3305:Added archive 3271: 3268: 3257:217.248.32.212 3252: 3251: 3182: 3181: 3155:131.215.22.188 3144: 3141: 3128: 3122: 3121: 3114: 3059: 3058: 3050:Added archive 3048: 3040:Added archive 3006: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2985:All the best: 2979: 2978: 2956: 2955: 2925: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2856:Atlas Shrugged 2851: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2749: 2715: 2712: 2679: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2652: 2651: 2604: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2579: 2542: 2539: 2516: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2474: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2430: 2427: 2410: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2352: 2351: 2309: 2306: 2295:216.184.15.103 2286: 2283: 2266: 2265: 2255:Roentgenium111 2230: 2228: 2227: 2192:69.178.167.194 2160: 2159: 2090: 2087: 2064: 2061: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2033: 1987: 1984: 1960: 1959: 1934: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1886: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1828: 1825: 1806: 1803: 1779: 1776: 1747: 1744: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1628: 1627: 1576: 1573: 1561:178.125.19.248 1550: 1547: 1531: 1528: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1460: 1457: 1435: 1432: 1409: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1375: 1374: 1338: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1267: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1185:Roentgenium111 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1138:Roentgenium111 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1093:Roentgenium111 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 978:Roentgenium111 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 949: 946: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 855:Roentgenium111 851:Watership Down 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 810: 809: 808: 807: 797:Roentgenium111 779:Roentgenium111 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 715:Roentgenium111 701: 700: 699: 698: 681: 680: 670:Roentgenium111 665: 664: 617: 616: 549: 548: 532: 531: 478: 473: 468: 463: 458: 453: 448: 406: 401: 396: 391: 386: 381: 376: 371: 343: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 323:204.38.187.193 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 191: 164: 151: 150: 149: 148: 96: 93: 90: 89: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3605: 3596: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3578: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3523: 3521: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3475: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3455: 3450: 3449: 3446: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3409: 3407: 3406: 3400: 3393: 3386: 3382: 3379: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3366: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3342: 3337: 3333: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3298: 3290: 3284: 3280: 3275: 3269: 3267: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3211: 3208: 3203: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3152: 3142: 3140: 3139: 3133: 3126: 3119: 3115: 3112: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3099: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3075: 3070: 3068: 3064: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3033: 3025: 3019: 3015: 3010: 3004: 2993: 2992: 2989: 2984: 2980: 2973: 2972: 2969: 2964: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2923: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2849: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2808: 2807: 2799: 2797: 2794: 2790: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2713: 2711: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2687: 2684: 2677: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2602: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2584: 2580: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2540: 2538: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2527:91.181.70.180 2524: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2478:L. Frank Baum 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2436: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2408: 2401: 2396: 2393: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2307: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2282: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2088: 2086: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075:182.73.85.182 2072: 2062: 2060: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1993:81.157.86.102 1985: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1939: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899:The Alchemist 1896: 1892: 1891:The Alchemist 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1863: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1827:The Alchemist 1826: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1804: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1787: 1785: 1777: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1765:84.210.17.201 1762: 1758: 1754: 1745: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1726: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1582: 1574: 1572: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1548: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1536:72.187.96.236 1529: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517:66.66.149.221 1510: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1433: 1431: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1407: 1401: 1398: 1397:littlebum2002 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1349:littlebum2002 1345: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 987: 983: 979: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 950: 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 929: 928: 917: 913: 909: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 864: 860: 856: 852: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 833: 829: 825: 821: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 789: 788: 784: 780: 775: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 750: 746: 742: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 724: 720: 716: 711: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 682: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 663: 659: 655: 651: 646: 645: 644: 640: 638: 632: 631: 627: 623: 615: 611: 607: 602: 601: 600: 596: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 568: 564: 563: 559: 555: 547: 543: 539: 534: 533: 530: 526: 522: 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 482: 479: 476: 471: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 442: 439: 438: 434: 430: 426: 421: 420: 416: 412: 407: 404: 399: 394: 389: 384: 379: 374: 370: 366: 364: 359: 358: 354: 350: 341: 332: 328: 324: 320: 315: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 294: 290: 286: 281: 276: 275: 274: 273: 272: 271: 264: 260: 256: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 202: 198: 195: 192: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177:Time magazine 174: 169: 165: 162: 158: 153: 152: 147: 143: 139: 135: 134: 133: 130: 122: 118: 117: 116: 115: 111: 107: 101: 94: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3582: 3562: 3527: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3495:The Guardian 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3476: 3465:72.53.64.124 3461: 3443: 3417:— Preceding 3413: 3390: 3365:source check 3344: 3338: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3315: 3276: 3273: 3253: 3221:78.34.140.91 3215:— Preceding 3212: 3206: 3204: 3183: 3171:Dfsghjkgfhdg 3146: 3123: 3098:source check 3077: 3071: 3066: 3062: 3060: 3011: 3008: 2986: 2966: 2927: 2853: 2805: 2804: 2789:Harry Potter 2776:Fragesteller 2717: 2681: 2678:In the media 2657:— Preceding 2610:— Preceding 2606: 2586: 2582: 2544: 2521:— Preceding 2518: 2476: 2439: 2432: 2412: 2395: 2353: 2313: 2311: 2288: 2281:Dave Fowler 2267: 2249: 2234:Majin Takeru 2229: 2212: 2208: 2182: 2178: 2175: 2164:Majin Takeru 2161: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2096:Majin Takeru 2092: 2069:— Preceding 2066: 2043:— Preceding 2040: 2004: 1989: 1964:— Preceding 1961: 1940: 1936: 1898: 1888: 1885:Wrong figure 1835:— Preceding 1830: 1808: 1792:84.210.10.52 1788: 1781: 1749: 1730: 1634: 1596: 1592: 1590: 1586: 1580: 1578: 1555:— Preceding 1552: 1533: 1514: 1476: 1462: 1443: 1437: 1420:93.36.138.71 1414:— Preceding 1411: 1382: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1326:Fragesteller 1322: 1292:Fragesteller 1266: 1088: 1047:Fragesteller 945:compromises: 941: 908:Fragesteller 824:Fragesteller 763:Fragesteller 759: 709: 649: 641: 636: 633: 622:Fragesteller 618: 597: 580:Alleluiacone 569: 565: 554:Fragesteller 550: 501: 490:Fragesteller 485: 483: 480: 477:- 41 million 474: 472:- 49 million 469: 467:- 49 million 464: 462:- 55 million 459: 457:- 58 million 454: 452:- 70 million 449: 447:- 84 million 444: 443: 440: 422: 411:Fragesteller 408: 405:- 14 million 402: 400:- 17 million 397: 395:- 17 million 392: 390:- 19 million 387: 385:- 20 million 382: 380:- 24 million 377: 375:- 29 million 372: 368: 367: 360: 345: 317:— Preceding 285:Fragesteller 279: 250:WP:SYNTHESIS 232: 228: 172: 102: 98: 70: 43: 37: 3332:Sourcecheck 3186:—Preceding 3149:—Preceding 2861:Gregcaletta 2688:, and so on 2486:Gstridsigne 2314:1.4 billion 2271:74.91.72.67 2186:—Preceding 2176:Hey Majin, 2120:—Preceding 2049:24.6.85.234 574:—Preceding 538:84.3.34.195 505:Leongrubach 429:70.60.0.160 349:Mark Foskey 36:This is an 3448:Farmbrough 2991:Farmbrough 2981:Topped 4b 2971:Farmbrough 2616:Shake16725 2591:Farmbrough 2459:Qaswed-Ger 2416:KahnJohn27 2341:Monozigote 2326:Monozigote 2126:Lidstrom82 1478:Davidships 3564:figure.-- 3503:Knowledge 3491:USA Today 3487:Knowledge 3479:Knowledge 3385:this tool 3378:this tool 3118:this tool 3111:this tool 2793:One Piece 2771:One Piece 1733:Kittyluna 87:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 3511:Gdthayer 3431:contribs 3419:unsigned 3391:Cheers.— 3289:cbignore 3241:Tornvmax 3217:unsigned 3188:unsigned 3151:unsigned 3124:Cheers.— 3024:cbignore 2945:Jcmcc450 2943:Source? 2930:Twobells 2850:Ayn Rand 2767:Tankōbon 2753:Stripy42 2720:Stripy42 2697:this one 2693:this one 2659:unsigned 2624:contribs 2612:unsigned 2558:DKCwiki 2523:unsigned 2455:added it 2441:Darrellx 2211:or just 2188:unsigned 2134:contribs 2122:unsigned 2071:unsigned 2045:unsigned 1978:contribs 1966:unsigned 1849:contribs 1837:unsigned 1557:unsigned 1446:hosam007 1416:unsigned 588:contribs 576:unsigned 319:unsigned 246:WP:UNDUE 181:Guardian 3586:Ibenami 3401::Online 3318:checked 3283:my edit 3134::Online 3063:checked 3018:my edit 2961:2-4 bn 2828:C933103 2548:DKCwiki 2213:printed 1944:Stevecb 1862:article 39:archive 3566:Kmhkmh 3326:failed 3297:nobots 3032:nobots 2906:Kmhkmh 2893:Kiyarr 2765:Manga 2573:Andrew 2008:Kude90 2006:other. 710:claims 427:) -- 280:always 2312:With 2250:sales 1841:Jondw 1707:Nanib 1671:(UTC) 1650:Nanib 1601:Nanib 1360:WP:OR 16:< 3590:talk 3570:talk 3549:talk 3545:Fram 3534:talk 3515:talk 3469:talk 3445:Rich 3427:talk 3322:true 3261:talk 3245:talk 3225:talk 3207:only 3196:talk 3175:talk 3159:talk 3067:true 2988:Rich 2983:here 2968:Rich 2963:here 2949:talk 2934:talk 2910:talk 2897:talk 2895:lls- 2883:talk 2879:Fram 2865:talk 2832:talk 2824:this 2814:talk 2780:talk 2757:talk 2740:talk 2736:Fram 2724:talk 2705:talk 2701:Fram 2667:talk 2645:talk 2641:Fram 2620:talk 2588:Rich 2583:what 2566:and 2552:talk 2531:talk 2505:talk 2501:Fram 2490:talk 2463:talk 2445:talk 2420:talk 2380:talk 2376:Fram 2361:talk 2357:Fram 2345:talk 2330:talk 2322:here 2320:and 2318:here 2299:talk 2275:talk 2259:talk 2238:talk 2221:talk 2217:Fram 2209:sold 2196:talk 2168:talk 2153:talk 2149:Fram 2130:talk 2100:talk 2079:talk 2053:talk 2027:talk 2023:Fram 2012:talk 1997:talk 1974:talk 1970:Fram 1948:talk 1923:talk 1919:Fram 1907:talk 1903:Eusc 1895:here 1875:talk 1871:Eusc 1867:here 1845:talk 1818:talk 1814:Fram 1796:talk 1769:talk 1737:talk 1711:talk 1654:talk 1621:talk 1617:Fram 1605:talk 1565:talk 1540:talk 1521:talk 1499:talk 1495:Fram 1482:talk 1450:talk 1440:here 1424:talk 1368:talk 1364:Fram 1330:talk 1296:talk 1240:talk 1236:Fram 1189:talk 1142:talk 1097:talk 1051:talk 982:talk 912:talk 859:talk 828:talk 801:talk 783:talk 767:talk 745:talk 741:Fram 719:talk 692:talk 688:Fram 674:talk 658:talk 654:Fram 626:talk 610:talk 606:Fram 584:talk 558:talk 542:talk 525:talk 521:Fram 509:talk 494:talk 433:talk 415:talk 353:talk 327:talk 289:talk 259:talk 255:Fram 233:book 229:sold 219:talk 201:talk 197:Fram 161:WP:V 142:talk 110:talk 3359:RfC 3336:). 3324:or 3309:to 3092:RfC 3054:to 3044:to 2695:or 2570:. 2324:.-- 1901:.-- 1089:you 942:may 211:IPL 173:are 3592:) 3572:) 3551:) 3536:) 3517:) 3471:) 3433:) 3429:• 3372:. 3367:}} 3363:{{ 3334:}} 3330:{{ 3295:{{ 3291:}} 3287:{{ 3263:) 3247:) 3227:) 3198:) 3177:) 3161:) 3105:. 3100:}} 3096:{{ 3030:{{ 3026:}} 3022:{{ 2994:, 2974:, 2951:) 2936:) 2912:) 2885:) 2867:) 2834:) 2816:) 2800:-- 2782:) 2759:) 2742:) 2726:) 2707:) 2699:. 2669:) 2647:) 2639:. 2626:) 2622:• 2594:, 2554:) 2533:) 2507:) 2492:) 2465:) 2447:) 2422:) 2382:) 2363:) 2347:) 2332:) 2301:) 2277:) 2261:) 2253:-- 2244:) 2240:) 2223:) 2198:) 2170:) 2155:) 2136:) 2132:• 2106:) 2102:) 2081:) 2055:) 2029:) 2014:) 1999:) 1980:) 1976:• 1950:) 1925:) 1909:) 1877:) 1851:) 1847:• 1820:) 1798:) 1786:. 1771:) 1739:) 1713:) 1656:) 1623:) 1607:) 1567:) 1542:) 1523:) 1501:) 1484:) 1452:) 1426:) 1383:is 1370:) 1332:) 1298:) 1242:) 1191:) 1183:-- 1144:) 1099:) 1053:) 984:) 914:) 861:) 830:) 803:) 785:) 777:-- 769:) 747:) 721:) 713:-- 694:) 676:) 660:) 628:) 612:) 590:) 586:• 560:) 544:) 527:) 511:) 496:) 435:) 417:) 365:) 355:) 329:) 291:) 261:) 240:, 221:) 215:RR 203:) 183:, 179:, 144:) 138:RR 123:. 112:) 106:RR 3588:( 3568:( 3547:( 3532:( 3513:( 3467:( 3456:. 3451:, 3425:( 3387:. 3380:. 3259:( 3243:( 3223:( 3194:( 3173:( 3157:( 3120:. 3113:. 2947:( 2932:( 2908:( 2881:( 2863:( 2830:( 2812:( 2778:( 2755:( 2738:( 2722:( 2703:( 2665:( 2643:( 2618:( 2550:( 2529:( 2503:( 2488:( 2461:( 2443:( 2418:( 2378:( 2359:( 2343:( 2328:( 2297:( 2273:( 2257:( 2236:( 2219:( 2194:( 2166:( 2151:( 2128:( 2098:( 2077:( 2051:( 2025:( 2010:( 1995:( 1972:( 1946:( 1921:( 1905:( 1873:( 1843:( 1816:( 1794:( 1767:( 1735:( 1709:( 1652:( 1619:( 1603:( 1563:( 1538:( 1519:( 1497:( 1480:( 1448:( 1422:( 1366:( 1328:( 1294:( 1238:( 1187:( 1140:( 1095:( 1049:( 980:( 910:( 857:( 849:" 826:( 799:( 781:( 765:( 743:( 717:( 690:( 672:( 656:( 624:( 608:( 582:( 556:( 540:( 523:( 507:( 492:( 431:( 413:( 351:( 325:( 287:( 257:( 217:( 199:( 187:. 140:( 108:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index