1889:
measurement is correct, but moreso, which in practice is used more commonly to measure or indicate poverty, regardless of their intent or designation. I am not here to further a "left-wing" agenda, nor do I belong to a "left-wing group". My edits to poverty in Canada, which I fully stand by, is designed to accurately capture the debate about which measure to use, as opposed to propose an argument itself. Knowledge's role is not to create argumentative essays on a topic, but rather to accurately summarize debate. There is a debate in this country about what to use as a poverty measure, and what is accurate.
794:
596:
773:
575:
2421:
definition, whether the new general definition of poverty will be announced rather than the specific measurement of child poverty. Maria Eagle: ‘Measuring Child
Poverty: a consultation document’ was specific in its intention to cover only child poverty. We have a pledge to eradicate child poverty by 2020 and we need to ensure that we can monitor long-term progress in the best possible way. Our final conclusions will therefore centre on child poverty measures only.
2619:
most recent data from the world bank and CIA pages are. Then I will add an additional column for specific more recent citations from other sources that users individually add. Let me know if anyone either can think of better approaches. Oh I also do think the current structure of having two tables one for international poverty levels and one for domestic is sound. But would be good to add a colmn to the domestic one listing what those levels are.
297:
276:
166:
81:
883:
862:
1942:"To avoid endless edit wars, we can agree to present each of the significant views fairly and not assert any one of them as correct. That is what makes an article "unbiased" or "neutral" in the sense presented here. Disputes are characterized in Knowledge; they are not re-enacted." We are not here to have a debate on what is the correct way to measure poverty in Canada, we are here to summarize that debate.
71:
402:
495:
474:
381:
53:
606:
701:
680:
22:
307:
893:
1297:
Libya and a good portion of sub-Saharan Africa. The only Map which should be shown is the poverty line map as this Map is misleading on the premise that it does not account for 1 dollar meaning more and attributing more to a country's standard cost of living than another countries standard cost of living. On that premise, this map is absolutely useless and even harmful.
205:
2184:
28%? Argentina has actually 23% of poor. The data aren't well... Mexico have less poverty than in Greece? Less than 20% HA HA HA please, how do they calculate the poverty rate? Perhaps that of the 25% of poor in India, 90% lives in extreme poverty, and in Greece less than 10% of the 20% lives in, but the data are also weird!! Be careful!!
1945:"All Knowledge articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and, as much as possible, without bias all significant views (that have been published by reliable sources). This is non-negotiable and expected on all articles, and of all article editors"
2831:
Back on here after 2 years. Wow I can not believe it but 2 people actually used my program to keep the map and table updated. Anyway I just did another update. But I don't think our data source is holding up well. The world bank seems to have stopped returning data other than 1.90 a day. I think they
2138:
I'd like to know why do we use the CIA source for the poverty rate? It is way too biased. Look at
Venezuela, the UN and national source put the Venezuela's poverty rate in around 30-32%, the CIA states a rate of 37%, off course they don't want to accept the efforts that the new leftist government has
2038:
Glad to see you registered. I can live with listing both, but others may not. The definition at the start of this article (2nd sentence) is basically the definition used by the Fraser
Institute 4.9% calculation, not the StatsCan 10.8% measure. So others may understandably reject the inclusion of the
1296:
This map is clearly misleading and unnecessary. It drives towards little conclusive evidence because it has a total disregard for inflation or the cost of living in relation to purchasing power parity dollars. The map also doesn't provide data for the United States, nearly all of Europe, Australia,
2466:
Where does this 7.2% figure stem from? In terms of "national poverty line" per the UNDP source, this is completely blank for Libya. The only country that even has a similar statistic with that value is Qatar. Looking back at this article's revision history, this seemed to only come up recently (last
2420:
Jacob, please read the sources. Your document states that the 60% below median is to measure child poverty only, a specific question was asked in parliment: Mr. Sayeed: To ask the
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to his answer of 9 June 2003, Official Report, column 703W, on poverty
2391:
I have reverted back to the cited source on the % of poverty in the UK. The information is from the
British government website and clearly states that poverty is defined by the Government as ‘household income below 60 percent of median income’. The median is the income earned by the household in the
2183:
Perhaps the CIA World Fact Book is one of the most important sources for this kind of data, but it looks really wrong when you compare countries to others: Greece have 20% of poor, Israel around 23% and India has almost the same they have with at 25%?? Ah and
Argentina has 30% of poor, whereas China
2012:
Thus, StatsCan is not explicitly stating that the LICO cannot be used as a poverty measure, but that the LICO is not intended to be one. Maybe it should be and maybe it shouldn't be, but the role of
Knowledge is not to make that judgment, but to elaborate on the ongoing and existent debate in Canada
1966:
This clearly and directly establishes the existence of a debate on this issue, as per
Knowledge's neutrality policy, this article must represent the different sides in this debate. If one believes certain groups "exaggerates" the level of poverty and that they are "biased" (as you have stated), that
1785:
I went ahead and removed statistics with extreme contradicting figures where one source doubles the other in percent, as presenting information in this manner is uninformative and pointless. I used the CIA factbook as priority for two reasons: First reason being that the world bank doesn't have info
1232:
which add much higher figures, clearly going against the cited sources. I also wanted to add that in Panama, the minimum wage is 300$ per worker per month and the poverty line stands at 1200 per worker per year, also, the informal sector (which cannot cover this amount) is at 20%, meaning that only
1079:
The numbers are adjusted for PPP - 10 AUD a day is very little in Sydney, imagine the plight of someone earning 2 AUD a day. The numbers capture exactly that. Earning 2 AUD(PPP) a day anywhere in the world represents a level of poverty that most middle class people around the world cannot even begin
2665:
First mass edit using the program to generate the table. I plan on updating the national poverty line table and the map next. I think the map should use the absolute poverty line table though. Also looking into why the world bank data is so incomplete especially because some of the reports you find
2571:
I just noticed that the map we have for people living under $ 2 PPP per day is from 2009. However, I also noticed the new UNDP Publications no longer report the number. Shouldn't we replace the map for one using the $ 1.25 PPP per day figures? They are the only ones that remained in the new report.
1675:
I really wonder that who would accept such a non-sense that 18 percent of people in Iran live under poverty line. It means that Iran gained a better rank than Israel or Spain which is impossible and also I dont think that the U.K has 17 percent poverty and the U.S has 12 percent. This ranking needs
2962:
If anyone is interested, and if I may do so, I'd like to publish here the sum of all data on the first table labeled "Percent of population (including non-citizens) living under $ 1.90, $ 3.20 and $ 5.50 a day". I've added all values for < $ 1.90, < $ 3.20 and < $ 5.50 as different "total
2618:
These lists are clearly in need of major maintenance due to consistency issues. None of the numbers match the currenct world bank page cited as it has been totally changed. I have some time on my hands to do this. My general plan is going to be to write a python script to update these whatever the
1901:
You are correct in stating the after-tax measure is more relavent. I have reverted the figure to that measure. However, as it stands, the LICO (whether we like it or not) is used more widely as a poverty measure, far more widely, than the basic needs measure. It therefore, until further debate and
1888:
The concern here arises from what constitutes a "poverty measure". The
European Union, for example, uses a relative measure. This contrasts with the U.S. which uses an absolute measure. The Fraser Institute's basic needs measure constitutes an absolute measure. I am not here to argue which form of
3246:
Actually I wanna tell you the major cause that why
Pakistan is not a developed country As you know that the nation which has honest person always perform good than other nation In Pakistan every people want money and they are not thinking about the whole of country that what will be the effect of
2740:
There is not data of poverty in the USA and UK, there are thousand of homeless and everyday there are more, and millions people with home and single mothers does not have money to buy food. This article leads to believe that there is not poverty in "first world". A first world country should have
2053:
Read my response above to understand the rationale for the inclusion of both figures. The opinions of those who read this page are not my concern, the policies of Knowledge are. Furthermore, note "There are many working definitions of "poverty," with considerable debate on how to best define the
1994:
Additionally, as you have identified, many groups do not identify the LICO as a valid poverty measure. One of these groups is Statistics Canada, the group that compiles this measure, and this is explicitly noted in the article. It should be noted the article you cite from StatsCan about the LICO
2889:
AFAIK ratio of poor people to total population and not total number of poor people indicate poverty. Moreover, US and Argentina don't even same definition of poverties. US is by far very well off in terms of per capita GDP, poverty ratios and household wealths. Argentina is more of a high upper
2693:
On a different note: Maybe a list could be taken straight from an open source, instead of having to edit the tables tediously? There are so many doubts about comparing the available data that it may not be worth while trying to put together something that looks authoritative but isn’t really.
1654:
The question of the appropriateness of the word "parity" despite the lack of systematic purchasing power estimates for the "poor" (and thus the impossibility of basing any judgement about "parity" of purchasing power of the "poor" between countries) is in addition to the general problem:
1643:
Suppose prices of cheap items bought by the "poor" go down. Suppose that is outweighed by rises - smaller in percentage terms - for expensive items of the "rich". Then a macroeconomist might say "the poor have not got richer" when in reality they could now buy more with their money.
1469:
Are you seriously telling me 17% of people in the UK live below the poverty line? I don't think so some how, that means more than Malaysia or Egypt? What? The US has far more people living below the poverty line but it's only registered as 12%. And where is Australia? This is incorrect
2683:
Thanks for all the work done, but shouldn’t the title of the page be changed? Or the tables sorted differently? Both tables are sorted alphabetically, although their titles, as well as the article’s title, suggest that countries are sorted by the percentage of the population living in
2002:"The proposed poverty lines have included, among others, relative measures (you are poor if your means are small compared to others in your population) and absolute measures (you are poor if you lack the means to buy a specified basket of goods and services designated as essential)."
1818:
Well until you can find a more complete and up-to-date source, it will have to do. All of the national poverty line figures sourced to the Human Development Report in the current article are out-dated anyhow, and in the 2007/2008 report many countries previously listed have no data.
1636:
National price indices, and therefore inflation indices, are more influenced by luxury items than by basic items. That follows logically from a mathematical truth: the total money spent on a category (prices multiplied by sales) determines that category's influence on the index.
1028:
Objection: Living in a clean street, with public lights, crime safety, clean drinking water, medical facilities, civil rights, good clothes to be found, charities all around with $ 10 is way better than having to support a family of 5 with the same budget in sub-saharian Africa.
1569:
I added Germany to the list. However, I didn't find any English scources so my reference is a German document from the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. This will likely be the reason for other missing (European) countries: there aren't any internet sources
2832:
consider other stats more indicative of poverty. Wondering if there are any thoughts about moving to some of the newer combined metrics that use things like infant mortality, cell phone use, ect instead of PPP as this stat has a number of issues. But yea super thanks to
2005:
This means that StatsCan itself does not identify the Fraser Institute's measure as official, nor has it ever argued that is it is a valid poverty measure. StatsCan clearly states in the article that there is a debate about whether a relative or absolute line should be
1935:
To accurately convey the debate on how to measure poverty in Canada, I have included both the relative and absolute measurement standards, and identified them accordingly. This satisfies the need to accurately represent the fact there is a debate on this issue in
1357:
Good question. Where are the raw data to back up these percentages? Number of people (x) living under (y) dollars/total population (z). Total population is easy enough to find, but what are the sources for x and y? And please don't say y is 1 dollar per day.
1851:
does produce a poverty threshold metric. It is quite common for left-wing groups in Canada to misquote a statistic produced by Statistics Canada, called the low-income cut-off rate, as a poverty measure because it is quite high relative to the poverty threshold
1786:
on many countries (including places like Germany and South Korea). Second reason being that the links to the world bank statistics are still broken. The entire list, in fact, should be ranked by the CIA figures, because they're more consistent and complete.
1265:
since when Portugal , slovenia even poland and others countries in eu has people living with less 1 dollar? it's impossible...for example in Portugal the goverment gives a salary for people who doesn't have a job... i think this list and map is a bit stupid
2111:
Additionally when sorting countries by values, the sort is alphabetic rather than numeric. Data is grouped by the first character so all countries with 2% are also grouped together with countries with 20-29% before the countries which have 3% and so on.
1959:"Canada has no official definition of poverty, no official method of measuring poverty, and no official set of poverty lines. In the absence of any kind of official government-approved methodology the debate over how to measure poverty continues to boil."
3247:
these things in future They are selfish and do not want to see their country as a developed country Until the people's f Pakistan will not become honest with their country The country will not progress And the GDP of the country will countinue decrease
2555:(2012 data). Likewise Indonesia has 29,705,166 in poverty (using 2011 poverty percentage and 2010 population data). (It's interesting that USA has more poor people than Indonesia, and there are certainly problems with comparisons like that.)
1962:
It mentions there are two sides to this debate. These are "The first group — the anti-poverty coalition" and "The second group — the pro-business coalition", where "Christopher Sarlo of the Fraser Institute is a leading spokesperson for this
1759:
Can we stick to one single source for the national poverty line table? What good is it if we have a listing saying a country has 15% and 30% poverty rate, or 15% and 5%? Also, the links to the world development indicators site are broken.
1858:
All-in-all, this results in more than tripling the figure from the poverty threshold approach to the pre-tax relative income StatsCan measure. A user (who happens to edit many left-wing-topic articles) is now trying to reinsert the
1948:"All articles must adhere to Knowledge's neutrality policy, fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in rough proportion to the prominence of each view."
2310:
The first map (population living with less than $ 1,25/day) is wrong in which regards to Brazil. Given that Brazil has less than 6 % of its population in that situation, its color in the map should be blue, and not yellow.
1428:
It is wrong, that 17.6% figure is for extreme poverty, not the same as just poverty (which is just under 40% for Mexico). While other figures represent just Poverty (US for example), where extreme poverty is at around 6%)
3226:
Can somebody fix those India and Pakistan values please? I've tried to revert changes from some guys that are clearly fighting about numbers instead of showing the correct real value for those countries, and I had no luck!
1269:
It's not impossible from the fact that they're EU members, cause everyone knows that they are the poorest countries in the EU but it's impossible because even in Belarus less than 2% of the population lives in poverty...
1658:
As a result of economists' and politicians' use of the word "dollar a day", many people may falsely believe that those on a "dollar a day" actually spend, in local terms, two, three or four times what they really can.
2873:
In USA there are much more poor people than in Argentina. Here, in Argentina, we are 44.938.712 inhabitants, and in USA there are more than 50 million of poors, so their poverty rate is higher than the Argentinian.
1916:
Using a metric designed by StatsCan that StatsCan itself says is not a poverty measure is just plain wrong. The CBC article you quote is incomplete and does not even compare the two measures. According to the
1478:
poverty line, it should be said. Many countries have their own different levels - often because the costs of living standards vary between different places. For example, one could survive quite comfortable in
2396:. it should also be noted that this individual has gone to numerous contribution of mine and deleted content, without using the talk paged and based upon his/hers POV.Jacob805 08:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
1951:
The role of Knowledge is not to conclude what poverty measure is valid in Canada. Knowledge must summarize the debate on poverty in Canada, and present the different viewpoints on the issue. As this article
1650:
Since the World Bank system did not look at prices for the "poor", it is perhaps difficult to see the term "purchasing power parity", in the present context of poverty, as anything other than a misnomer.
2096:
I totally agree with you. I think there is an argument for having them in alphabetical order, but an additional table ordered from highest % to lowest would be very helpful for anybody trying to compare.
1679:
Iran does really have 18% of poverty, Venezuela has 12% and Guatemala 29%. Maybe you're just being too paranoic and the USA has 12%, Iran has surpassed Spain and Israel and is better than them right now.
1392:
According to the World Bank, the population below the poverty line in Mexico is 17.6% not the 10.1% that is listed. Either way, I don't know why the country is painted that color which represents : -->
1025:
For example, here in Sydney, if you earn $ 10 a day, you would effectively be living on the streets! Yet, this article openly classifies people living on the streets in Western countries as NOT poor!
2467:
August specifically). Before that, it had for awhile an out of place (but correct per the CIA World Factbook source) footnote stating that 1/3 of Libyans were at or below the national poverty line.
557:
2470:
If anyone can show how this 7.2% figure is calculated or where it comes from, it would be very helpful. Otherwise, it should be removed or revised to conform with what the other sources here say.
3365:
1586:
What about cuba? I couldn't find it on the page and I think it would be a very interesting comparison. I suspect they'd have a really low rate of people below their country's poverty line.
949:
939:
3315:
1855:
To exaggerate the point further, groups also quote StatsCan's pre-tax measure rather the after-tax measure, even though StatsCan favours the use of the after-tax measure for obvious reasons.
547:
3208:- Each time you want to execute the script again (to test against the different values I provided on the step above), you should reset your "totalValue" and "totalCountries" variables to 0
1967:
is applicable to other groups too. The low-income cut off or LICO is advocated as a poverty measure by the following groups that satisfy the criterion of prominence as per NPOV guidelines:
2773:
I would like to fill more in. Current left table uses world bank data but feel free to add points if you can get reliable stats from some where. The right table does have US data points.
2963:
results". Then divided those results by the quantity of countries listed on the table. I did this only for the cells in which there was an actual value (meaning I excluded "N/A" values)
3340:
1500:
What would be good is to list in the table what the "poverty line" is for each of the respective places. Add this as a third column. Otherwise (as we can see) the table is confusing. --
755:
745:
1416:
The list says that the 35% of the mexican population live under the poverty line, so the map is wrong cuz it indicate that the poverty in mexico is from 10% to 20%.. is contradictory.
3360:
3320:
2211:
3310:
2981:- Edit the tbody of the table you want to do this on (there are only 2 tables on this article at the time I'm writing this), by adding an "id" attribute. Set it to "only_this_table"
1867:
article, thus implying that Canada (a wealthy country with many social programs) has more poverty than countries like Columbia, Syria, and Thailand in the Knowledge poverty list.
3345:
915:
982:
There is some data about Finland. The column says < $ 3.10, the percentage is 13.7. However, the percentage source is about households having income of 60% of median income.
3335:
523:
1989:
1210:
721:
2716:
I don't know of a better source thats more open than world bank and CIA the program that pulls the data is open source(and needs run again bla I will get to it one day).
1640:
This means that price and inflation indices are mathematically biased in favour of the "rich" - if by that we mean people who buy expensive things and/or many things.
1022:
In most developed countries, if you earn $ 10 a day, you would be poorer than someone earning $ 2 a day in some developing countries. This article doesn't reflect that.
906:
867:
3206:- You can change the number where it reads "trNode.cells" to 1, 2 or 3. 1 represents < $ 1.90 cell, 2 represents < $ 3.20 cell and 3 represents < $ 5.50 cell
1633:
This problem is compounded by the mathematics of price indices. A related problem concerning representativeness affects measures of prices and inflation in general.
502:
479:
1627:
Things are generally cheaper in "poor" countries than in the USA. So the World Bank dollars are in those countries generally worth a fraction of a real dollar.
1233:
20% of the population may or may not earn the 300 per month. Thereby leaving 20% of the population or even less of the population living in poverty. That's all.
185:
708:
685:
3355:
844:
834:
1333:
Is this self-reported by each government in question or is it relative to some UN / US Government established poverty line? Might be good to add this info.
2009:
The article also notes: "As long as that represents their own considered opinion of how poverty should be defined in Canada, we have no quarrel with them"
1921:
article they are possibly the best statistical orgianization in the world and their opinions on their own metric should trump that of the CBC hands down.
3330:
3285:
2525:
the map is outdated. there is a new data already. for instance nepal is 24.82% for < $ 1.25/day in the table and the colour of the map shows over 40%
2489:
the map is outdated. there is a new data already. for instance nepal is 24.82% for < $ 1.25/day in the table and the colour of the map shows over 40%
1803:
Maybe after they find WMD in Iraq we can rely on CIA info, otherwise I don't see them as putting much effort into coming up with a comparable list here.
662:
652:
363:
353:
247:
3350:
1898:
To quote directly from this article by the CBC: "In Canada, there isn't a standard measure of poverty. The most accepted one, however, is the LICO."
1384:
I dont think that Egypt has only 16.7% of the population below poverty line..can someone verify this information or provide a more recent statistic
1496:
I think there is a strong need to have a column for Poverty line values. Does any one know any place where such data might be reliably available?
3290:
3275:
1701:
993:). Therefore the median net income per person is almost 30 euros a day, and 60% of that is 18 euros. The number is obviously totally incorrect.
3325:
3280:
810:
456:
3300:
2921:
446:
2054:
term." Additionally, many countries on this list are quoted according to a relative measure of poverty, the U.K. being a prominent example.
3270:
2907:
2875:
2860:
2757:
2353:
2119:
2098:
1277:
1180:
1000:
628:
329:
103:
1032:
Someone needs to update the article to reflect the fact that poverty in the West is actually A LOT higher than suggested by these tables.
3305:
3256:
3248:
3236:
3216:
2952:
2929:
2915:
2896:
2883:
2868:
2849:
2821:
2782:
2765:
2750:
2725:
2703:
2675:
2660:
2645:
2628:
2607:
2592:
2584:
2561:
2538:
2530:
2479:
2471:
2456:
2433:
2381:
2361:
2341:
2326:
2318:
2300:
2280:
2246:
2227:
2199:
2178:
2163:
2148:
2127:
2106:
2091:
2083:
2063:
2048:
2032:
1990:
http://www.socialplanningtoronto.org/Research%20&%20Policy%20Updates/New%20Data%20Access%20Pamphlets/Poverty%20Statistics%20html.htm
1930:
1911:
1903:
1876:
1830:
1812:
1797:
1779:
1748:
1744:
1717:
1688:
1665:
1616:
1601:
1593:
1578:
1561:
1531:
1504:
1459:
1444:
1423:
1410:
1373:
1323:
1305:
1285:
1253:
1188:
1164:
1156:
1131:
1117:
1103:
1089:
1072:
1058:
1043:
1008:
2651:
Making progress slowly but surely check the git repo. Anyway just noticed all the map comments I will make a replacement for that too.
3228:
2191:
1365:
1349:
1109:
3370:
3295:
1436:
801:
778:
2756:
Yes..and to expand your very good point..there are far to many entries with data not available, rather makes the list meaningless.
1179:
are still being deleted, the source is a legitimate CEPAL source. It SHOULDN'T be deleted again and replaced by a higher source.
422:
2502:
2633:
This is the git repo for this project probably put in a hour so far so don't judge too harsh yet. Happy to take contributions.
2552:
2551:
i.e. according to the US poverty line percentage of 15.1% in 2010, they have 47,508,073 in poverty if we use the population at
2214:
which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries. Editors are invited to participate.
1249:
619:
580:
320:
281:
94:
58:
2512:
2412:
2975:
If interested, this is how I did it, using only Chrome's DevTools. You'll probably need some HTML and JavaScript knowledge:
1971:
312:
1775:
1621:
The "dollar a day" and "two dollars a day" statements from the World Bank are based on what are known as PPP dollars.
178:
33:
1624:
PPP stands for "purchasing power parity", but the system has not considered specific prices relevant to the "poor".
2890:
middle income country in terms of most indicators and a developing country most certainly in terms of wealth holding.
1853:
418:
414:
409:
386:
1541:
What about Germany, Norway and other missing (European) countries? Why are they not ranked, isn't there any poverty?
1630:
But what people on one or two World Bank dollars a day can actually buy has not been estimated by the World Bank.
2943:
which is both a higher quality article and simple a better way of thinking about this issue. Any thoughts on this?
2082:
Why are countries listed in alphabetical order? Why not according to the values one of the columns to the right? --
2028:
1713:
911:
2859:
In USA there are many poorer than in Argentina. In USA there is much more poverty than population in Argentina. --
990:
1127:
1099:
1068:
1054:
1039:
507:
2925:
2253:
1953:
1856:
1511:
1281:
1184:
220:
2911:
2879:
2864:
2761:
2393:
2357:
2123:
2102:
1049:
Does anyone agree that the clarification needs to be included? Can anyone suggest the wording of the change?
1004:
3252:
2588:
2534:
2475:
2322:
2237:
This list needs to be updated with the more recent 2009 figures and the new measerment line of 1.25 a day. --
2087:
1863:
LICO figure into this article, even though they are aware of the dynamics above as they have also edited the
1740:
1597:
1557:
3232:
2508:
2195:
1907:
1369:
1345:
1160:
1113:
1085:
2372:
In the second table, Russia and Taiwan have a year listed in a column that should only have percentages. --
1440:
1845:
1406:
1123:
1095:
1064:
1050:
1035:
511:
970:
Why colour of India is not matching the Poverty rate? Can someone please fix it? Pakistan's is wrong too.
204:
2940:
2837:
2817:
2603:
2274:
1736:
1553:
1420:
39:
1341:
1081:
3212:
2906:
reliable. In USA there are much more poor people than in Argentina (52 million against 11 million). --
2346:
Data from Brazil was vandalized. Correct values from source: Under 5.5 20% Under 3.2 4% Under 1.9 4%
1698:
Pakistan has a population below poverty line of 25% as of 2006..............this needs to be updated.
1019:
It is meaningless to use one set amount (in this case $ 2) as a measure of poverty for all countries.
2892:
2557:
2400:
2349:
2314:
2187:
2115:
2016:
1763:
1732:
1589:
1549:
1432:
1401:
1361:
1337:
1273:
1237:
1229:
1152:
996:
236:
2583:
but its percentage of people living under less than $ 2 a day is higher. Does this even make sense?
522:, on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2429:
2404:
2296:
2140:
1996:
1684:
1455:
1245:
1221:
898:
2666:
online from them actually contain more data. Might also try to combine with the CIA factbook data
2216:
1199:
1144:
Pakistan has dropped it's poverty level by about 5%, to 17%. Please change your data now, thanks!
914:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
809:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
720:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
627:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
328:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
102:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2746:
2452:
2408:
2242:
2144:
2044:
1926:
1872:
1808:
2013:
about that judgment. This statistic, therefore, must include those on both sides of the issue.
2548:
Would it be possible to create a separate list of number of people in poverty in each country?
1705:
2948:
2845:
2833:
2778:
2721:
2671:
2656:
2641:
2624:
2516:
2222:
1983:
1918:
1893:
1864:
1841:
1662:
1613:
793:
772:
595:
574:
193:
1108:
If no-one objects, I will add a brief note in the article to reflect the point I made above.
2811:
2741:
statistics of poverty in its own territory, why there are not data or references about it?--
2599:
1977:
1848:
1826:
1793:
1771:
1302:
86:
2634:
1320:
200:
2291:
Why isn't Mexico's UNDP poverty rate source isn't from the UN? It should be on "Other".--
2699:
2425:
2337:
2292:
2174:
2059:
2024:
1972:
http://www.ncwcnbes.net/documents/publicstatements/Archives/2003_NCWResponse_mbmENG.htm
1709:
1680:
1451:
1241:
1147:
611:
213:
165:
2169:
The CIA World Fact Book is one of the most important sources for this kind of data. --
1483:
on $ 15,000 USD a year, and even buy the odd item like a fridge or a computer. In the
3264:
2920:
Short time ago, many activists denounced that in USA there are 43% of poor people. --
2742:
2580:
2448:
2444:
2377:
2238:
2159:
2040:
1922:
1868:
1804:
1484:
519:
2799:
1480:
2944:
2841:
2791:
OECD table would be useful for comparing poverty rates among more developed nations
2774:
2717:
2667:
2652:
2637:
2620:
1844:
article, Statistics Canada has abdicated the role of producing any poverty measure.
1575:
515:
1882:
Firstly, please do not dismiss my concerns by the fact I am not a registered user.
1729:
please, check those maps cuz are wrong and contradictory to the data below them.
296:
275:
80:
1902:
analysis by other parties, should be used as the poverty measure in this article.
1822:
1789:
1767:
806:
2804:
2572:
Alternatively, alter the map to allow indexes from the governments themselves?
991:
https://tilastokeskus.fi/til/tjt/2013/03/tjt_2013_03_2015-04-02_tau_001_fi.html
494:
473:
1501:
1317:
985:
The net median household income in Finland was over 22000 euros/year in 2014 (
888:
882:
861:
717:
605:
601:
302:
76:
2695:
2333:
2170:
2055:
2020:
1954:
http://www.streetlevelconsulting.ca/homepage/homelessness2InCanada_Part2.htm
1216:
1205:
1176:
624:
401:
380:
325:
70:
52:
2598:
I would wait as long as you will replace the removed picture with another.
2394:
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp2004/rp04-023.pdf
700:
679:
306:
2373:
2155:
1612:
Are these U.S. dollars or PPP dollars? There is a difference, i believe.
892:
712:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
1510:
Does anyone really believe that in China only 2.8% live in poverty? --
713:
99:
2501:
2941:
https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
1194:
2983:- Execute the following (copy + paste if you want) on the console:
2979:- Create variables "totalValue" and "totalCountries". Set both to 0
2576:
1647:
Similar considerations apply in relation to country comparisons.
2939:
I am considering deleting this page and just having it point to
1997:
http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/13F0027XIE/13F0027XIE.htm
1080:
to grasp. I have altered the disclaimer to represent this fact.
986:
2496:
1292:
Map showing perc. of pop. living on less than 1 dollar per day
15:
1301:
Actually, the data incorporates those things, see the source.
989:). The household size was about 2.05 persons per household (
2332:
I believe there is a similar error regarding Costa Rica. --
1984:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/economy/poverty-line.html
1894:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/economy/poverty-line.html
421:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1978:
http://www.ccsd.ca/pubs/2007/upp/measuring_low_income.htm
2515:
was declined. The reason is the same as your request at
979:
Sweden, Singapore, Norway, New Zealand, Italy, Finland?
2635:
https://github.com/utilitarianexe/wiki_poverty_list_bot
2212:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries
1398:
1140:
Pakistan is now at only 17% poverty, please change info
154:
149:
144:
139:
1094:
So where is the source that says it is PPP adjusted?
1063:
Added a brief note in the article myself to clarify.
1148:
http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=180567
910:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
805:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
623:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
506:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1397:When the map was uploaded Mexico was listed as 40%
3366:Low-importance Urban studies and planning articles
2977:- Open up DevTools inspector and go to the console
2567:No more data for people living under $ 2 PPP a day
2445:http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm
3316:Low-importance International development articles
2966:< $ 1.90 total percentage: 13.951829268292686
2810:Unfortunately, I may not be able to help much. --
2800:https://data.oecd.org/inequality/poverty-rate.htm
1316:Strictly, Gaza strip is not clearly a country? --
1228:These sources clearly oppose the changes made by
3341:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
2972:< $ 5.50 total percentage: 41.75243902439025
2969:< $ 3.20 total percentage: 26.21158536585365
924:Knowledge:WikiProject Urban studies and planning
2424:Per BRD please gain concensus for any changes.
1999:) not being a poverty measures also identifies:
927:Template:WikiProject Urban studies and planning
532:Knowledge:WikiProject International development
3361:List-Class Urban studies and planning articles
3321:WikiProject International development articles
2252:Did a new US figure of 14.3% just come out? --
730:Knowledge:WikiProject Finance & Investment
535:Template:WikiProject International development
3346:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
3311:List-Class International development articles
733:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment
8:
3336:List-Class Finance & Investment articles
2805:https://www.google.com/search?q=oecd+poverty
413:, an attempt to structure and organize all
2347:
994:
856:
767:
674:
569:
468:
375:
270:
173:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
127:
47:
21:
19:
2840:for keeping this going while I was gone.
1015:Wrong metric to use for measuring poverty
1976:Canadian Council on Social Development:
417:. If you wish to help, please visit the
1939:As per Knowledge:Neutral point of view,
858:
769:
676:
571:
470:
377:
272:
49:
1892:This article clearly identifies such:
1175:Why does sources to countries such as
975:Where is the data for these countries?
907:WikiProject Urban studies and planning
503:WikiProject International development
188:; see if anything catches your fancy.
7:
904:This article is within the scope of
799:This article is within the scope of
709:WikiProject Finance & Investment
706:This article is within the scope of
617:This article is within the scope of
500:This article is within the scope of
407:This article is within the scope of
318:This article is within the scope of
92:This article is within the scope of
3356:Low-importance Social work articles
2139:done to decrease the poverty rate.
1982:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation:
930:Urban studies and planning articles
38:It is of interest to the following
2935:Thoughts on replacing this article
2579:has a lower poverty rate than the
2392:middle of the income distribution.
538:International development articles
14:
3331:Low-importance sociology articles
3286:Mid-importance Economics articles
2827:Updates and ideas for new metrics
2210:A discussion has been started at
1393:40%, it should be colored green.
819:Knowledge:WikiProject Social Work
736:Finance & Investment articles
131:WikiProject Countries to-do list:
2500:
2443:I think we can update the chart
891:
881:
860:
822:Template:WikiProject Social Work
792:
771:
699:
678:
604:
594:
573:
493:
472:
400:
379:
305:
295:
274:
203:
164:
79:
69:
51:
20:
3351:List-Class Social work articles
2958:Total value for the first table
2553:List of countries by population
944:This article has been rated as
839:This article has been rated as
750:This article has been rated as
657:This article has been rated as
637:Knowledge:WikiProject Sociology
552:This article has been rated as
451:This article has been rated as
358:This article has been rated as
338:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics
246:pages of related articles, and
112:Knowledge:WikiProject Countries
3291:WikiProject Economics articles
3276:WikiProject Countries articles
2869:12:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
2766:11:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
2704:12:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
2281:17:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
1374:04:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
640:Template:WikiProject Sociology
341:Template:WikiProject Economics
201:clean-up listing for Countries
115:Template:WikiProject Countries
1:
3326:List-Class sociology articles
3281:List-Class Economics articles
3237:19:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
2953:03:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
2850:08:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
2822:04:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
2751:12:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
2629:02:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
2434:06:44, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
2382:22:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
2228:11:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
2164:22:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
2134:Can we remove the CIA source?
2092:06:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
1970:National Council on Welfare:
1931:19:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
1912:05:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
1877:08:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
1749:21:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
1424:02:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
1324:13:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
1261:Portugal and other EU members
1009:15:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
987:http://findikaattori.fi/fi/60
969:
918:and see a list of open tasks.
813:and see a list of open tasks.
724:and see a list of open tasks.
631:and see a list of open tasks.
526:and see a list of open tasks.
332:and see a list of open tasks.
313:Business and economics portal
106:and see a list of open tasks.
3301:Low-importance List articles
3257:09:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
3242:Pakistan the poorest country
2916:18:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
2897:14:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
2884:17:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
2855:USA more poor than Argentina
2783:06:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
2726:06:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
2676:02:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
2661:00:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
2646:02:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
2562:04:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
2539:23:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
2362:23:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
2301:01:03, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
2149:01:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
1831:21:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1813:21:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
1798:17:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
1780:20:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
1718:09:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
1617:18:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
1460:01:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
1450:But it is NOT from the UN.--
1445:02:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
1090:12:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
3271:List-Class country articles
2064:00:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
2049:21:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2039:10.8% figure in this list.
2033:13:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
1689:20:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1602:06:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
1286:21:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
1254:20:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
1073:06:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
1059:10:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
1044:08:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
431:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
3387:
3306:WikiProject Lists articles
3217:17:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
2930:09:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
2493:oudated map/ update needed
2247:23:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
2107:00:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
1666:17:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
1505:12:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
1411:22:14, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
1189:17:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
1132:07:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
1118:05:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
1104:03:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
950:project's importance scale
921:Urban studies and planning
912:Urban studies and planning
868:Urban studies and planning
845:project's importance scale
756:project's importance scale
663:project's importance scale
510:, including such areas as
457:project's importance scale
434:Template:WikiProject Lists
364:project's importance scale
2736:Poverty in the USA and UK
2457:01:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
2342:19:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
2327:18:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
2179:19:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
1988:Social Planning Toronto:
1579:11:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1532:14:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
1487:, that's close to penury.
1329:Who reports poverty line?
943:
876:
838:
787:
749:
694:
656:
589:
551:
529:International development
508:international development
488:
480:International development
450:
395:
357:
290:
126:
64:
46:
3371:Declined requested edits
3296:List-Class List articles
2985:
2608:08:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2593:06:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
2480:02:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
2200:15:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
2128:22:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
1545:That's called socialism.
1165:18:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
727:Finance & Investment
686:Finance & Investment
221:Category:Stubs by region
3222:India and Pakistan data
2529:Out of date info as of
2485:Outdated! update needed
2078:Reordering of countries
1306:17:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
802:WikiProject Social Work
415:list pages on Knowledge
2519:- no new map suggested
512:appropriate technology
28:This article is rated
3000:'#only_this_table tr'
2544:Poverty by population
1704:comment was added by
620:WikiProject Sociology
321:WikiProject Economics
95:WikiProject Countries
2513:conflict of interest
2511:by an editor with a
1840:As explained in the
825:Social work articles
219:de-stub articles in
3180:`Total percentage:
899:Architecture portal
643:sociology articles
344:Economics articles
34:content assessment
3211:Section added by
2523:
2522:
2517:Poverty threshold
2417:
2403:comment added by
2364:
2352:comment added by
2317:comment added by
2268:
2264:
2260:
2226:
2190:comment added by
2118:comment added by
2035:
2019:comment added by
1919:Statistics Canada
1865:Poverty in Canada
1842:poverty in Canada
1782:
1766:comment added by
1751:
1735:comment added by
1721:
1592:comment added by
1566:
1552:comment added by
1537:missing countries
1526:
1522:
1518:
1447:
1435:comment added by
1409:
1376:
1364:comment added by
1354:
1340:comment added by
1276:comment added by
1257:
1240:comment added by
1155:comment added by
1011:
999:comment added by
964:
963:
960:
959:
956:
955:
855:
854:
851:
850:
766:
765:
762:
761:
673:
672:
669:
668:
568:
567:
564:
563:
467:
466:
463:
462:
410:WikiProject Lists
374:
373:
370:
369:
269:
268:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
3378:
3202:
3199:
3196:
3193:
3190:
3187:
3184:
3181:
3178:
3175:
3172:
3169:
3166:
3163:
3160:
3157:
3154:
3151:
3148:
3145:
3142:
3139:
3136:
3133:
3130:
3127:
3124:
3121:
3118:
3115:
3112:
3109:
3106:
3103:
3100:
3097:
3094:
3091:
3088:
3085:
3082:
3079:
3076:
3073:
3070:
3067:
3064:
3061:
3058:
3055:
3052:
3049:
3046:
3043:
3040:
3037:
3034:
3031:
3028:
3025:
3022:
3019:
3016:
3013:
3010:
3007:
3004:
3001:
2998:
2995:
2994:querySelectorAll
2992:
2989:
2902:This article is
2614:Fixing this page
2560:
2504:
2497:
2416:
2397:
2329:
2271:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2220:
2202:
2154:No, we can't. --
2130:
2014:
1849:Fraser Institute
1761:
1730:
1699:
1604:
1565:
1546:
1529:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1430:
1404:
1359:
1353:
1334:
1288:
1256:
1234:
1167:
932:
931:
928:
925:
922:
901:
896:
895:
885:
878:
877:
872:
864:
857:
827:
826:
823:
820:
817:
796:
789:
788:
783:
775:
768:
738:
737:
734:
731:
728:
703:
696:
695:
690:
682:
675:
645:
644:
641:
638:
635:
614:
609:
608:
598:
591:
590:
585:
577:
570:
558:importance scale
540:
539:
536:
533:
530:
497:
490:
489:
484:
476:
469:
439:
438:
435:
432:
429:
404:
397:
396:
391:
383:
376:
346:
345:
342:
339:
336:
315:
310:
309:
299:
292:
291:
286:
278:
271:
241:
235:
208:
207:
179:Article requests
168:
161:
160:
128:
120:
119:
118:country articles
116:
113:
110:
89:
87:Countries portal
84:
83:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
23:
16:
3386:
3385:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3377:
3376:
3375:
3261:
3260:
3244:
3224:
3204:
3203:
3200:
3197:
3194:
3191:
3188:
3185:
3182:
3179:
3176:
3173:
3170:
3167:
3164:
3161:
3158:
3155:
3152:
3149:
3146:
3143:
3140:
3137:
3134:
3131:
3128:
3125:
3122:
3119:
3116:
3113:
3110:
3107:
3104:
3101:
3098:
3095:
3092:
3089:
3086:
3083:
3080:
3077:
3074:
3071:
3068:
3065:
3062:
3059:
3056:
3053:
3050:
3047:
3044:
3041:
3038:
3035:
3032:
3029:
3026:
3023:
3020:
3017:
3014:
3011:
3008:
3005:
3002:
2999:
2996:
2993:
2990:
2987:
2960:
2937:
2922:190.183.247.113
2893:Aman Kumar Goel
2857:
2829:
2793:
2738:
2616:
2575:Case in point,
2569:
2558:John Vandenberg
2556:
2546:
2495:
2487:
2464:
2462:Libyan figures?
2441:
2398:
2389:
2370:
2312:
2308:
2289:
2279:
2254:
2235:
2208:
2185:
2136:
2113:
2080:
1838:
1757:
1727:
1700:—The preceding
1696:
1676:to be updated.
1673:
1610:
1587:
1547:
1539:
1512:
1494:
1467:
1390:
1382:
1335:
1331:
1314:
1294:
1271:
1263:
1235:
1230:CieloEstrellado
1173:
1150:
1142:
1124:Marcopolo112233
1096:Marcopolo112233
1065:Marcopolo112233
1051:Marcopolo112233
1036:Marcopolo112233
1017:
977:
972:
929:
926:
923:
920:
919:
897:
890:
870:
824:
821:
818:
815:
814:
781:
735:
732:
729:
726:
725:
688:
642:
639:
636:
633:
632:
610:
603:
583:
537:
534:
531:
528:
527:
482:
436:
433:
430:
427:
426:
389:
343:
340:
337:
334:
333:
311:
304:
284:
253:
239:
233:
199:
159:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
78:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
3384:
3382:
3374:
3373:
3368:
3363:
3358:
3353:
3348:
3343:
3338:
3333:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3298:
3293:
3288:
3283:
3278:
3273:
3263:
3262:
3243:
3240:
3223:
3220:
3207:
3192:totalCountries
3153:totalCountries
3147:totalCountries
2986:
2982:
2980:
2978:
2976:
2959:
2956:
2936:
2933:
2908:190.183.247.61
2900:
2899:
2876:190.183.247.61
2861:186.111.145.80
2856:
2853:
2828:
2825:
2808:
2807:
2802:
2795:For example:
2792:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2758:86.183.140.255
2737:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2650:
2615:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2568:
2565:
2545:
2542:
2528:
2521:
2520:
2505:
2494:
2491:
2486:
2483:
2463:
2460:
2440:
2437:
2388:
2385:
2369:
2368:Cleanup needed
2366:
2354:198.49.164.173
2334:Crio de la Paz
2307:
2304:
2288:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2273:
2234:
2231:
2207:
2206:New Discussion
2204:
2171:Crio de la Paz
2167:
2166:
2135:
2132:
2120:124.148.152.39
2099:46.208.185.228
2079:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2010:
2007:
2003:
2000:
1992:
1986:
1980:
1974:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1957:
1949:
1946:
1943:
1940:
1937:
1899:
1896:
1890:
1886:
1883:
1837:
1834:
1816:
1815:
1756:
1753:
1726:
1725:Maps are wrong
1723:
1695:
1692:
1672:
1669:
1609:
1606:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1538:
1535:
1508:
1507:
1493:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1466:
1465:United Kingdom
1463:
1414:
1413:
1389:
1386:
1381:
1378:
1330:
1327:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1293:
1290:
1278:217.24.250.130
1262:
1259:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1181:201.218.79.101
1172:
1169:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1120:
1106:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1016:
1013:
1001:82.128.191.136
976:
973:
971:
968:
966:
962:
961:
958:
957:
954:
953:
946:Low-importance
942:
936:
935:
933:
916:the discussion
903:
902:
886:
874:
873:
871:Low‑importance
865:
853:
852:
849:
848:
841:Low-importance
837:
831:
830:
828:
811:the discussion
797:
785:
784:
782:Low‑importance
776:
764:
763:
760:
759:
752:Low-importance
748:
742:
741:
739:
722:the discussion
704:
692:
691:
689:Low‑importance
683:
671:
670:
667:
666:
659:Low-importance
655:
649:
648:
646:
629:the discussion
616:
615:
612:Society portal
599:
587:
586:
584:Low‑importance
578:
566:
565:
562:
561:
554:Low-importance
550:
544:
543:
541:
524:the discussion
498:
486:
485:
483:Low‑importance
477:
465:
464:
461:
460:
453:Low-importance
449:
443:
442:
440:
405:
393:
392:
390:Low‑importance
384:
372:
371:
368:
367:
360:Mid-importance
356:
350:
349:
347:
330:the discussion
317:
316:
300:
288:
287:
285:Mid‑importance
279:
267:
266:
263:
262:
259:
258:
255:
254:
252:
251:
224:
209:
189:
186:article alerts
184:Check out the
172:
170:
169:
158:
157:
152:
147:
142:
136:
133:
132:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3383:
3372:
3369:
3367:
3364:
3362:
3359:
3357:
3354:
3352:
3349:
3347:
3344:
3342:
3339:
3337:
3334:
3332:
3329:
3327:
3324:
3322:
3319:
3317:
3314:
3312:
3309:
3307:
3304:
3302:
3299:
3297:
3294:
3292:
3289:
3287:
3284:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3268:
3266:
3259:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3249:182.184.59.55
3241:
3239:
3238:
3234:
3230:
3221:
3219:
3218:
3214:
3209:
2984:
2973:
2970:
2967:
2964:
2957:
2955:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2942:
2934:
2932:
2931:
2927:
2923:
2918:
2917:
2913:
2909:
2905:
2898:
2895:
2894:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2871:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2854:
2852:
2851:
2847:
2843:
2839:
2838:User:फ़िलप्रो
2835:
2826:
2824:
2823:
2819:
2815:
2814:
2806:
2803:
2801:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2790:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2763:
2759:
2753:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2735:
2727:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2705:
2701:
2697:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2682:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2663:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2648:
2647:
2643:
2639:
2636:
2631:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2585:190.141.17.93
2582:
2581:United States
2578:
2573:
2566:
2564:
2563:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2543:
2541:
2540:
2536:
2532:
2531:81.158.228.59
2526:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2503:
2499:
2498:
2492:
2490:
2484:
2482:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2472:98.109.80.205
2468:
2461:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2438:
2436:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2395:
2386:
2384:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2367:
2365:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2344:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2330:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2319:201.94.199.31
2316:
2305:
2303:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2286:
2282:
2278:
2277:
2272:
2270:
2269:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2232:
2230:
2229:
2225:
2224:
2219:
2218:
2213:
2205:
2203:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2181:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2133:
2131:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2109:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2094:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2084:121.44.30.201
2077:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2037:
2036:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2011:
2008:
2004:
2001:
1998:
1993:
1991:
1987:
1985:
1981:
1979:
1975:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1958:
1955:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1904:24.85.222.215
1900:
1897:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1843:
1835:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1754:
1752:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1737:Shrewsbury333
1734:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1693:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1677:
1670:
1668:
1667:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1645:
1641:
1638:
1634:
1631:
1628:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1615:
1607:
1605:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1594:175.100.38.78
1591:
1580:
1577:
1573:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1554:71.102.78.245
1551:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1536:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1506:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1491:
1486:
1485:United States
1482:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1426:
1425:
1422:
1421:Shrewsbury333
1417:
1412:
1408:
1403:
1399:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1387:
1385:
1379:
1377:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1328:
1326:
1325:
1322:
1319:
1311:
1307:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1291:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1267:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1231:
1222:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1211:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1204:
1200:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1170:
1168:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1157:72.29.237.165
1154:
1149:
1145:
1139:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1014:
1012:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
992:
988:
983:
980:
974:
967:
951:
947:
941:
938:
937:
934:
917:
913:
909:
908:
900:
894:
889:
887:
884:
880:
879:
875:
869:
866:
863:
859:
846:
842:
836:
833:
832:
829:
812:
808:
804:
803:
798:
795:
791:
790:
786:
780:
777:
774:
770:
757:
753:
747:
744:
743:
740:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
705:
702:
698:
697:
693:
687:
684:
681:
677:
664:
660:
654:
651:
650:
647:
630:
626:
622:
621:
613:
607:
602:
600:
597:
593:
592:
588:
582:
579:
576:
572:
559:
555:
549:
546:
545:
542:
525:
521:
520:social issues
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
499:
496:
492:
491:
487:
481:
478:
475:
471:
458:
454:
448:
445:
444:
441:
437:List articles
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
406:
403:
399:
398:
394:
388:
385:
382:
378:
365:
361:
355:
352:
351:
348:
331:
327:
323:
322:
314:
308:
303:
301:
298:
294:
293:
289:
283:
280:
277:
273:
249:
245:
238:
231:
229:
225:
222:
218:
216:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
196:
195:
190:
187:
183:
181:
180:
175:
174:
171:
167:
163:
162:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
137:
135:
134:
130:
129:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
82:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
18:
17:
3245:
3229:98.28.177.15
3225:
3210:
3205:
2974:
2971:
2968:
2965:
2961:
2938:
2919:
2903:
2901:
2891:
2872:
2858:
2830:
2812:
2809:
2794:
2754:
2739:
2664:
2649:
2632:
2617:
2574:
2570:
2550:
2547:
2527:
2524:
2509:edit request
2488:
2469:
2465:
2442:
2423:
2419:
2399:— Preceding
2390:
2371:
2348:— Preceding
2345:
2331:
2309:
2290:
2275:
2256:
2255:
2236:
2221:
2215:
2209:
2192:90.29.12.133
2182:
2168:
2137:
2114:— Preceding
2110:
2095:
2081:
1885:To continue:
1860:
1839:
1821:
1817:
1788:
1784:
1758:
1728:
1697:
1678:
1674:
1663:Matt Berkley
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1646:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1614:EamonnPKeane
1611:
1588:— Preceding
1585:
1571:
1540:
1514:
1513:
1509:
1495:
1492:Poverty Line
1475:
1468:
1449:
1427:
1418:
1415:
1391:
1383:
1366:70.55.57.112
1356:
1342:70.22.104.32
1332:
1315:
1295:
1268:
1264:
1227:
1174:
1146:
1143:
1110:115.70.84.48
1082:BusSpotter23
1034:
1031:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1018:
995:— Preceding
984:
981:
978:
965:
945:
905:
840:
800:
751:
707:
658:
618:
553:
516:microfinance
501:
452:
419:project page
408:
359:
319:
243:
227:
226:
212:
211:
192:
191:
177:
176:
93:
40:WikiProjects
3213:Billy_Tunin
2813:Timeshifter
2600:Bladesmulti
2313:—Preceding
2186:—Preceding
2015:—Preceding
1762:—Preceding
1731:—Preceding
1548:—Preceding
1437:24.4.234.86
1431:—Preceding
1360:—Preceding
1336:—Preceding
1303:Ultramarine
1272:—Preceding
1236:—Preceding
1151:—Preceding
816:Social Work
807:Social Work
779:Social Work
237:WPCountries
3265:Categories
3186:totalValue
3138:totalValue
3132:totalValue
3108:parseFloat
3054:&&
3036:&&
2276:GOOD WORKS
1572:in English
1402:Astrokey44
1312:Gaza Strip
718:Investment
423:discussion
30:List-class
3144:moreValue
3126:innerText
3102:moreValue
3069:innerText
3051:innerText
2426:Outofsinc
2293:Kanzler31
1956:) states,
1852:approach.
1681:Cocoliras
1452:Kanzler31
1242:Cocoliras
1217:Venezuela
1206:Guatemala
1177:Guatemala
634:Sociology
625:sociology
581:Sociology
335:Economics
326:Economics
282:Economics
109:Countries
100:countries
59:Countries
3215:- Date:
2988:document
2743:P2prules
2684:poverty.
2449:J intela
2439:New Data
2413:contribs
2405:Jacob805
2401:unsigned
2387:Outasinc
2350:unsigned
2315:unsigned
2239:J intela
2188:unsigned
2141:Tony0106
2116:unsigned
2029:contribs
2017:unsigned
1776:contribs
1764:unsigned
1745:contribs
1733:unsigned
1714:contribs
1702:unsigned
1694:Pakistan
1590:unsigned
1562:contribs
1550:unsigned
1481:Việt Nam
1433:unsigned
1362:unsigned
1350:contribs
1338:unsigned
1274:unsigned
1250:contribs
1238:unsigned
1153:unsigned
997:unsigned
3168:console
3075:indexOf
3006:forEach
2945:Lonjers
2842:Lonjers
2775:Lonjers
2718:Lonjers
2668:Lonjers
2653:Lonjers
2638:Lonjers
2621:Lonjers
2263:OUNDERS
2217:Pfainuk
1963:group."
1936:Canada.
1861:pre-tax
1755:Sources
1608:Dollars
1576:Mintaru
1521:OUNDERS
1171:because
948:on the
843:on the
754:on the
714:Finance
661:on the
556:on the
455:on the
362:on the
194:Cleanup
145:history
3114:trNode
3057:trNode
3039:trNode
3027:trNode
3015:=: -->
3012:trNode
2306:Brazil
2287:Mexico
2267:NTENT
2233:Update
1836:Canada
1823:Sbw01f
1790:Sbw01f
1768:Sbw01f
1525:NTENT
1474:Below
1195:Panama
248:assess
36:scale.
3120:cells
3063:cells
3045:cells
3033:cells
2834:James
2755:: -->
2577:Chile
2507:This
2006:used.
1502:Tphcm
1476:their
1388:dubai
1380:Egypt
1321:|talk
1318:BozMo
1122:Done
428:Lists
387:Lists
228:Other
214:Stubs
155:purge
150:watch
3253:talk
3233:talk
2949:talk
2926:talk
2912:talk
2880:talk
2865:talk
2846:talk
2836:and
2818:talk
2779:talk
2762:talk
2747:talk
2722:talk
2700:talk
2696:Geke
2672:talk
2657:talk
2642:talk
2625:talk
2604:talk
2589:talk
2535:talk
2476:talk
2453:talk
2430:talk
2409:talk
2378:talk
2358:talk
2338:talk
2323:talk
2297:talk
2243:talk
2223:talk
2196:talk
2175:talk
2160:talk
2145:talk
2124:talk
2103:talk
2088:talk
2060:talk
2056:Mft1
2045:talk
2041:Deet
2025:talk
2021:Mft1
1927:talk
1923:Deet
1908:talk
1873:talk
1869:Deet
1847:The
1827:talk
1809:talk
1805:Deet
1794:talk
1772:talk
1741:talk
1710:talk
1706:Mm11
1685:talk
1671:Iran
1598:talk
1558:talk
1456:talk
1441:talk
1407:talk
1370:talk
1346:talk
1282:talk
1246:talk
1185:talk
1161:talk
1128:talk
1114:talk
1100:talk
1086:talk
1069:talk
1055:talk
1040:talk
1005:talk
716:and
518:and
244:talk
232:add
140:edit
3183:$ {
3174:log
3099:let
3087:!==
3081:'%'
2904:NOT
2374:JHP
2156:JHP
1400:--
940:Low
835:Low
746:Low
653:Low
548:Low
447:Low
354:Mid
242:to
3267::
3255:)
3235:)
3165:})
3096:){
3021:if
3003:).
2951:)
2928:)
2914:)
2882:)
2874:--
2867:)
2848:)
2820:)
2781:)
2764:)
2749:)
2724:)
2702:)
2674:)
2659:)
2644:)
2627:)
2606:)
2591:)
2537:)
2478:)
2455:)
2447:--
2432:)
2415:)
2411:•
2380:)
2360:)
2340:)
2325:)
2299:)
2259:HE
2245:)
2198:)
2177:)
2162:)
2147:)
2126:)
2105:)
2090:)
2062:)
2047:)
2031:)
2027:•
1929:)
1910:)
1875:)
1829:)
1811:)
1796:)
1778:)
1774:•
1747:)
1743:•
1716:)
1712:•
1687:)
1600:)
1574:!
1564:)
1560:•
1517:HE
1458:)
1443:)
1419:--
1372:)
1352:)
1348:•
1284:)
1252:)
1248:•
1187:)
1163:)
1130:)
1116:)
1102:)
1088:)
1071:)
1057:)
1042:)
1007:)
514:,
240:}}
234:{{
3251:(
3231:(
3201:)
3198:`
3195:}
3189:/
3177:(
3171:.
3162:}
3159:1
3156:+
3150:=
3141:+
3135:=
3129:)
3123:.
3117:.
3111:(
3105:=
3093:1
3090:-
3084:)
3078:(
3072:.
3066:.
3060:.
3048:.
3042:.
3030:.
3024:(
3018:{
3009:(
2997:(
2991:.
2947:(
2924:(
2910:(
2878:(
2863:(
2844:(
2816:(
2777:(
2760:(
2745:(
2720:(
2698:(
2670:(
2655:(
2640:(
2623:(
2602:(
2587:(
2533:(
2474:(
2451:(
2428:(
2407:(
2376:(
2356:(
2336:(
2321:(
2295:(
2265:I
2261:F
2257:T
2241:(
2194:(
2173:(
2158:(
2143:(
2122:(
2101:(
2086:(
2058:(
2043:(
2023:(
1995:(
1952:(
1925:(
1906:(
1871:(
1825:(
1807:(
1792:(
1770:(
1739:(
1720:.
1708:(
1683:(
1596:(
1556:(
1523:I
1519:F
1515:T
1454:(
1439:(
1405:|
1368:(
1344:(
1280:(
1244:(
1183:(
1159:(
1126:(
1112:(
1098:(
1084:(
1067:(
1053:(
1038:(
1003:(
952:.
847:.
758:.
665:.
560:.
459:.
425:.
366:.
250:.
230::
223:.
217::
197::
182::
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.