Talk:List of municipalities in Ontario

700:

the accuracy of the information. Readers should verify the information before acting on it by contacting municipalities directly to confirm official municipal names. Although the list has been carefully prepared, the Ministry does not accept any legal responsibility for the contents of the list or for any consequences, including direct or indirect liability, arising from its use. This is the disclamer on the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs. They created them and even THEY don't know for sure what has been accumulated of the years in the close to 500 municipalities in Ontario they created...Says a lot about Ontario's Municipal Affairs, hey?. As far as AMO is concerned I would not trust a word they say or publish as an association. It's basically a group of Publicly Employed Gangsters. Ask the Mayor of Toronto David Miller even he said so. Its a self-serving club of corrupt bureaucrats and the politicians that bend over to serve them.

1281:

whitespace between the section heading and the beginning of the table. I just noticed that despite repeated comments about these formatting problems the images are present not because they are felt to improve this particular article but because, quote, "a FL must have images and other media, hence these photos", and since the article passed FL review with several pages' worth of whitespace (or with reviewers whose screens were wide enough to not notice the issue), that's not seen as an issue in need of a fix. I disagree with this fixation on the FL review; that should not stand in the way of improving the list. Apparently the style of gallery I had chosen, which displayed the captions only if one hovers the cursor over the images, was a little too fancy; I'll choose a different style of gallery. If there is some genuine benefit to the whitespace layout, I'd ask those reverting me to please explain it to me.

954:(statutes, bylaws etc) are made, federally, provincially (or what ever the divison), and municipaly (all levels) that often include the water ways. The provinces, do not end at the shore line of a lake/river/etc, their jurisdiction is over their whole territory (yes given their "powers" vs "federal"), for example provincial authorities enforce blood alcohol boating laws, etc. Cities often have bylaws concerning swiming hours, for example, does their authority to enforce end at the shoreline? As a general comparaison of territories (country, province, territory, county, city) we usually use the whole area under the autthority we are talking about. As a comparaison, when someone says "average", it usually refers to the mean, not the mode or median. There are many different ways to compare "largest" "territory", this is the most common, most understood, most expected. 1722:, "regional municipality" is defined as "... an upper-tier municipality that was a regional or district municipality or the County of Oxford on December 31, 2002". It is my understanding that on December 31, 2002, Muskoka was a district municipality, and Oxford was a county. Despite their official legal names respectively remaining as the District Municipality of Muskoka and the County of Oxford to this day, based on the above definition, they are officially regarded as regional municipalities under the 1222:, which would have been inclusive of any single tier municipalities and Indian reserves enclaved by the upper tier municipalities. This is something that should be audited and corrected accordingly with accompanying notes that explain why the population counts are no longer consistent with the sourced census division populations. There is at least one eager editor watching this page in addition to me that could pull this off in due course if you don't have the time to undertake yourself. Cheers, 198: 320: 982:

disconnect and the article no longer meets featured list criteria. I think it's just easier to keep it consistent with land area. In fact, if you insist, you would have to change the tables for all 13 provinces and territories (several thousand municipalities, or days of work), as well as the leads from all provinces. The lead must reflect the table, so either you change both or none. Frankly, it's a monumental task for such a small change.

21: 264: 122: 366: 348: 58: 458: 440: 276: 188: 153: 1562:

2001 defines these three terms: "regional municipality", "county" and "local municipality". The official names of these three upper-tier municipalities begin with "United Counties of", and their census division type is "United counties". However, Muskoka and Oxford do not have names beginning with "Regional Municipality of", and do not have the census division type "Regional municipality".

300: 376: 1708:, "local municipality" is an umbrella term used to inclusively describe municipalities that are either single-tier or lower-tier municipalities. "Local municipality" is therefore not a municipal sub-type. Rather, it is a grouping of two municipal types. This article accurately reflects the definition and its relationship to the two municipal types. The resulting 1123:. This page layout issue affects at least the B.C. and Quebec municipalities list too; I suspect it affects all of them. Failing a good solution, I'm with Secondarywaltz here – it is probably better if the images get tossed (or at least hidden for now as 'comment code') so that they don't "break" the table layout on certain computer displays. -- 1969: 1616:

apprarently here at the census division level (with unified counties actually potentially being counties and others). The municipal sub-type columns are intended to achieve consistency between the two tables and to overcome StatCan's errors where present, which is why the columns aren't titled as "Census (sub)division types".

584:

Regional Government and you are perpetuating the propaganda by confusion out Municipal Master create in Ontario to keep everyone confused. We have a confused municipal structure on purpose because it facilitates corruption in our municipal government levels by our non-elected senior administrators in power for life.

1846:

excludes the geographic area of the former Regional Municipality of Sudbury - now the City of Greater Sudbury. The census division "Muskoka" has the type "District municipality" but not "District". There is a census subdivision for each lower-tier municipality of the upper-tier municipality of Muskoka.

1939:

my suggestion would be abandoning the current source for the Census division column and replacing with the sources I link in reply to the anon's first post under this thread. I think having both Census division and Geographic area columns would be too confusing and would clutter. It is already a very

1853:. The article for Kenora District says it has a district seat. Both the articles for the District of Algoma and the District of Kenora give websites of a DSSAB. Notice there are actually two DSSAB districts in the territorial district of Algoma. I have posted on the talk pages of both these articles. 1561:

If "Regional municipality" is given as a municipal sub-type for Muskoka and Oxford, "County" should be given for the three former unions of counties. The table currently gives "United counties" for the three former unions of counties. In addition to defining the municipal statuses, the Municipal Act,

1238:

By quick review, Bruce, Dufferin, Durham, Grey, Haliburton, Halton, Huron, Lambton, Lennox and Addington, Muskoka, Niagara, Northumberland, Oxford, Prescott and Russell, Waterloo, and York don't appear to have single tiers and thus should have accurate populations, unless there are Indian reserves in

981:

I have read your argument, and it makes sense for many contexts, but not for these particular lists. For featured lists, the lead is a summary and reflection of the list itself, which uses land area. Unless you want to change all 444 municipalities of Ontario to land area + water area then there is a

937:

I've noticed some back and forth editing regarding the area statistic in the lead. I think it's important to remain consistent with our list which features land area for each municipality (the amount of lake is irrelevant for the purpose of this article, people generally don't live on water, and this

1677:

I was thinking that the three former unions of counties fell under the definition of "county". The structure of Ontario is confusing. Subsections 455 (1), (2) and (3) of Municipal Act, 2001 assign new statuses to Ontario's municipalities. Subsections 455 (4) and (5) state that unions of counties and

1569:

Although the names of the single-tier municipalities of Brant, Haldimand County, Norfolk County and Prince Edward are respectively County of Brant, Haldimand County, Norfolk County and County of Prince Edward, their census subdivision types are all "City". The table of local municipalities does give

699:

At the bottom of the MAH link is this Disclaimer... The information is provided as a public service and is not an official list of municipal names. Although we endeavor to ensure that the information is as current and accurate as possible, errors do occasionally occur. Therefore, we cannot guarantee

1137:

They were present when we brought up to featured status, and they add nicely to the otherwise very long table, so they should stay. The question is how do we better format the table so they fit along the right side on certain screens. I've tried the other provinces on several screens and Ontario is

1087:

Is there any way to force the table to conform to a certain width that allows the images to be on the right side of the table? Although my screen has the images on the right side, I tried another and found them all stacked above the table with lots of white space. This isn't a problem for the other

786:

First off, it is incorrect to speak of being found in "census divisions" because that would imply that the counties and RMs are not census divisions themselves, and they are. And secondly, why do you keep insisting on reiterating the same information in your edits? The fact that districts are not

533:

To GaryWill's edits: District in some places is synonymous with Region. The term needs to be clarified because Ontario's municipal structure is all ready screwed up and confusing enough without using terms people can misconstrue. This is a big problem with Ontario government propaganda. Wiki is not

1280:

I had turned the images in the "List of local municipalities" section into a gallery at the top of the list because in the current style, if the browser window (or the screen) isn't wide enough, images and table get stacked above each other instead of side-by-side, leading to a few pages' worth of

1195:

The population numbers for Stormont, Dundas & Glengarry are way off. The census division for this area is 111,164. Then you have to subtract Cornwall from that, because it's not part of the upper tier government, which has a population of around 47,000 and then you have to subtract Akwesasne

1152:

PS to IJBall, yes I read our exchange before, your issue stems from reading off a very small screen. There is happily a very easy solution for your case. If you are using chrome you can just zoom out 10% and it should fix the issue, also it will make browsing easier as well (my personal preference

568:

This is the municipal structure of Ontario with the Single and Double Tier municipalities categorized. Ontario has a very complicated patched up network of different structures not found in many other places of the world. I initially refered to it as the "unique structure of Ontario" and this has

1772:

For the single-tier municipalities of Haldimand County and Norfolk County, two inexistent census divisions are given by the table of local municipalities. Haldimand and Norfolk are actually within the single census division Haldimand-Norfolk with the generic type "Census division". Similarly, the

594:

WikiWoo: the list CLEARLY states what is a single tier and what is dual tier in the first-rank headings. You don't need to reiterate that in the second-rank headings. If you want to make things clearer, what you should be doing is writing a blurb about each type under the heading. That way the

1647:

Local municipalities are no longer "Cities", "Towns", "Villages" or "Townships". Similarly, Muskoka is no longer a District municipality. In most cases census subdivision types match official name prefixes. I don't think StatCan made an error when assigning types to the Muskoka and Oxford census

619:

Ok the way you have it now is less ambigious. I am not sure about the part that none of the ones you have listed as found in districts where never double tiers. There was a lot of activity with municipalities going single tier that were under other tiers over the last 10 years and the list keeps

953:

When we compare provinces, territories, countries, for the purpose of government entities, we normally include all the area that is under the jurisdiction of thes entities. People live, work, play, hunt, fish, drink, use vehicles, build, etc on every part of the territory, land and water. Laws

882:

of municipal restructuring content because its placement at the end of the first paragraph in the lead interrupted the flow and the two references provided didn't support the content (the first of the two was a deadlink though). I do however think it would be great to have this type of content,

1010:

topic is "land area" in both prose and in the tables themselves. Cherry-picking "total area" (land + freshwater) for the benefit of Ontario in prose is inconsistent among all lists within the topic and incongruent internally with the "land area" columns in the tables within the article. (It is

1845:

This means the area municipalities of Sudbury Region geographically overlapped both the Regional Municipality of Sudbury and the Territorial District of Sudbury. Three layers could not "fit" into the two layer system of census divisions and subdivisions. As a census division, Sudbury District

583:

To OsgoodeLawyer: I had all Single-Tier together in one list. You kept saying they are not all single tier. I prooved you wrong. So now you want to confuse which is single tier and which is within or (under as some people might read it) a district. In the US and other places District are like

842:

The City of Toronto is not subject to the Municipal Act, 2001 (see s. 7.1 of the Act), but rather is unique in Ontario in that it has its own complete governing statute (City of Toronto Act, 2006) (there are are municipalities with their own statutes in Ontario, but none of them displace the

1615:

Re: census division types, StatCan has a history of making errors in assigning proper census subdivision types. It has happened (and been corrected by StatCan) in Alberta (Wood Buffalo and non-existent county status) and is still present in at least one instance in BC (Northern Rockies) and

1637:

I'm not sure if you understand the point I was trying to make. I was thinking "local municipality" as a municipal sub-type for all local municipalities would be consistent although redundant if "regional municipality" is used as municipal sub-type for Muskoka and Oxford. "City" is a census

1909:

Nice catch on Greater Sudbury's census division as well. Not sure I am seeing any further action necessary as it relates to Muskoka, but if I am missing something, please advise. If you are requesting action on how districts are presented on this article, please advise as well.

1018:

There is no compelling reason provided above to justify why the province's "total area" must be front and centre in the opening sentence of an article when all areas in the balance of the article (8 in prose, 440 municipality entries and 4 summed areas) are "land areas".

843:

Municipal Act as is the case with Toronto). I don't care how this information is presented in the article (so feel free to revise my edit), but I thought it was sufficiently important to mention (given how the Municipal Act was described in the first few paragraphs). --

1638:

subdivision type. "City of" is a name prefix of many local municipalities. "District municipality" is the census division type for the District Municipality of Muskoka. "Regional municipality", "local municipality" and "county" are defined in Municipal Act, 2001.

1565:

The table of local municipalities gives the census subdivision type under "Municipal sub-type". If this list gives the census subdivision type, the table of regional municipalities and counties should give the census division type under "Municipal sub-type".

1604:

Re: unions of counties, are there sources that can be provided that confirm each were simply "counties" and that they were "united counties" in name only (branding purposes only)? If so, we can note them as "counties" in that column rather than "united

1257:

Fixed. The IP editor was correct, Cornwall is not part of that Upper Tier Municipality. I've made the changes, but the Akwesasne figures have already been removed so no change was needed there. I also fixed the percent change and area/density figures.

718: 678: 551: 1840:

I believe the creation of the Regional Municipality of Sudbury did not create a hole in the Territorial District of Sudbury. I believe the Territorial District of Muskoka was never dissolved when the District Municipality of Muskoka was created.

938:

is about government and it's relation to human geography, not physical geography). I will revert this edit assuming good faith, and await any compelling reason to go against the purpose of this article and include water area in the lead.

100: 35: 1726:. This is why they are presented as regional municipalities under the "Municipal sub-type" column rather than district municipality and county respectively (which is what StatCan classifies them as in the census division realm). 1827: 620:

getting longer as more of them go Single-Tier. Where did you get the part about each of those never being under another tier? Muskoka for one had separation that I recall. I can't find the source of you info for your list.

754:

This link goes to a page which is a recreation of one which was recently deleted through AfD. It has a slightly different name, but it is clearly the same article. As such, it will be deleted. In addition, if anything

1780:. On this government web page, the column "Geographic Area" was mistaken for a column of census divisions. The entities given in the column "Geographic Area" are the geographic areas defined in Schedules 1 and 2 of 1732:

defines "county" as "... an upper-tier municipality that was a county, including the Frontenac Management Board, on the day before this Act came into force". Do we have reliable and verifiable sources that confirm:

1196:

for the same reason, with a population of around 10,000. The upper tier municipality is only responsible for a population of just over 50,000. I wonder how many other population mistakes there are in this table.

1065:, a FL must have images and other media, hence these photos. Inclusion of these types of photos and formatting oddities due to different screen resolution choices have not been issues that prevented successful 809:

There are now 444 municipalities in Ontario (as of 2009), I will change this number on the main page but I can't find which ones amalgamated. So there is one municipality on this list that no longer exists.

1832:

In provincial law, the City of Greater Sudbury and the District Municipality of Muskoka are respectively within the Territorial District of Sudbury and the Territorial District of Muskoka. In Schedule 2 of

2071: 1809: 1806: 1857: 1788: 1619:

Re: single-tier municipalities, it appears you are just making a comment, agreeing that the municipal sub-types in that table are correct since I am not seeing any "county" entries in that column.

1574: 1683: 1658: 2066: 599:

you can get your point across that districts are not counties. (Although this is already stated in one of the paragraphs--how many times do you intend to state the same thing in your work?)

1712:, where single-tiers and lower-tiers are presented, has had its "Municipal sub-type" column renamed as "Census subdivision type" to address that municipal sub-types technically don't exist. 1570:

the correct census subdivision type under "municipal sub-type" for these four single-tier municipalities. "County" is not census subdivision type, but it is however a census division type.

1803: 2111: 2040: 2101: 1802:

Correct. Nice catch. We have two options. First is to change the column title to "Geographic area". Second is to correct the census division for the two entries and source to

1704:

It appears you are aware that there are only three municipal status types in Ontario as of January 1, 2003 – upper-tier, single-tier, and lower-tier municipalities. In the

2081: 244: 64: 2106: 2096: 1503: 1499: 1485: 1393: 1389: 1375: 1837:, "Sudbury" is the name of a geographic area defined therein. As I stated above, geographic areas defined in this regulation were mistaken for census divisions. 2121: 1748:

Hopefully this helps, and thank you for your patience. Admittedly I am having difficulty understanding what your thought process is trying to convey. Cheers,

1718:, before we consider renaming the "Municipal sub-type" column and/or revising the column's content, we need to flesh this out a little further. First, in the 759:

be done to save that page (but seeing as it's a recreation of a deleted page, it should be speedied), it would be adding information which would be better on

665:

list these as municipalities: Akron, Wawa, Shedden, Searchmont -- all in Algoma District. Do we have better information that says they are municipalities? --

787:

municipalities is already clearly stated in the article. We don't need to keep saying the same thing over and over. I assure you that people can read.

329: 171: 2136: 2091: 2076: 1471: 502: 309: 167: 2007: 1773:

County of Brant and the City of Brantford are single-tier municipalities within a single census division with the generic type "Census division".

1610:“regional municipality” means an upper-tier municipality that was a regional or district municipality or the County of Oxford on December 31, 2002 1608:

Re: Muskoka and Oxford, even though they retained district and county in their names, they were/are still regional municipalities. The Act states

1301: 254: 2033: 902:

Does anyone know how to format the second table so that the images can be on the right of the table instead of on top with a lot of white space?

1218:

I believe your observation is correct. When the upper tier municipality table was built, it was probably built using the populations of them as

545: 508: 2126: 2116: 1849:

It looks like there is some confusion between territorial districts and DSSAB districts. The districts for the ten DSSAB's are defined in

2141: 2003: 970: 1861: 1792: 1578: 2086: 1687: 1662: 1138:

the only one that caused a problem, and then only on one of the many screens I tried (a small laptop screen). It works fine on mine.

1715: 1709: 1481:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1455: 1371:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1331: 1203: 406: 220: 737:

I've taken the four off the list, and that gives us 445 municipalities, which is how many the government and AMO say there are. --

478: 1046:

especially when they disrupt the prime purpose of the article - which is to the list of details about Ontario's municipalities.

2131: 1361: 826: 1889:

This is a lot to sort and digest, especially at this late hour. Will circle back on the weekend to respond/address. Cheers,

1588:

This is a lot to sort and digest, especially at this late hour. Will circle back on the weekend to respond/address. Cheers,

1842: 1679: 289: 163: 2048: 1546: 1436: 389: 353: 211: 158: 133: 1871:

Would an easy fix simply be renaming this column "Geographic Area", and provide the source you gave in the references?

569:

been evolving from there. The Census Divisions as a list is something different and it lacks any informative structure.

474: 470: 465: 445: 40: 1069:

reviews for this list and subsequent nominations for the equivalent lists for four provinces and three territories.

1472:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160130070116/http://www.leedsgrenville.com/en/invest/profile/membermunicipalities.asp

1502:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1392:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2015: 1107: 1051: 30: 2029:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

1728:

If there is no disputing this, then second, it looks like we are down to "united counties" vs. "county". The

1305: 2044: 1826:

Furthermore, the local municipality table gives "Sudbury" as the name of Greater Sudbury's census division.

1537: 1463: 1427: 1339: 966: 793: 769: 635: 605: 121: 20: 1475: 1207: 1459: 57: 1521:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1509: 1411:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1399: 848: 725: 685: 558: 139: 44: 1462:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1338:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1199: 958: 814: 675:

I know for a fact that Wawa is in Michipicoten Township. I think the others are also in townships. --

1308:). Similarly East Ferris and Strathroy-Caradoc have both changed from "township" to "municipality". 2011: 1876: 1263: 1180: 1158: 1143: 1120: 1103: 1093: 1047: 1043: 992: 943: 907: 822: 883:

properly referenced, added to the article within a new "Municipal restructuring" section. Cheers,

405:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

219:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1743:

on December 31, 2002, the United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry held "county" status?

1355: 1349: 962: 764: 630: 600: 2052: 2019: 1985: 1949: 1919: 1898: 1880: 1865: 1820: 1796: 1757: 1691: 1666: 1628: 1597: 1582: 1551: 1506:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1441: 1396:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

1317: 1290: 1267: 1248: 1231: 1211: 1184: 1162: 1147: 1132: 1111: 1097: 1078: 1055: 1028: 996: 974: 947: 926: 911: 892: 867: 852: 830: 799: 776: 741: 728: 704: 688: 669: 642: 624: 612: 588: 573: 561: 538: 1522: 1412: 48: 717: 677: 660: 550: 1362:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160202093525/http://www.countyofperth.on.ca/about_perth_county

1128: 844: 721: 681: 554: 402: 1828:

Greater Sudbury is actually within a census division of the generic type "Census division".

1740:

on December 31, 2002, the United Counties of Prescott and Russell held "county" status; and

1529: 1419: 1981: 1945: 1915: 1894: 1816: 1753: 1624: 1593: 1313: 1244: 1227: 1219: 1074: 1024: 1006:

To paraphrase what I posted on my talk page, the standard among all lists within Canada's

922: 888: 863: 319: 1011:

recognized that Ontario's rank as second-largest in total area is valid, which is why I

1934: 1872: 1488:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1378:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1286: 1259: 1176: 1154: 1139: 1089: 1062: 988: 939: 903: 818: 281: 1737:

on December 31, 2002, the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville held "county" status;

1528:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1418:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

2060: 2025:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

1066: 738: 666: 381: 203: 1365: 2008:

Talk:List_of_census_divisions_of_Ontario#Definition_of_"Single-tier_municipalities"

1976:

hearing nothing, I have implemented what I suggested on December 17, 2018. Cheers,

1102:

Throw them out! They serve no purpose and disrupt the viewing of the list content.

701: 621: 585: 570: 535: 263: 1850: 1834: 1781: 1495: 1385: 1124: 595:

headings, which are already unambigous, despite what you claim, can stay simple

365: 347: 1977: 1941: 1911: 1890: 1812: 1749: 1620: 1589: 1494:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1384:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1309: 1240: 1223: 1070: 1020: 918: 884: 859: 371: 271: 193: 187: 152: 1282: 1061:

I understand where you are coming from, but this list is a FL. Per #5(b) at

663: 457: 439: 2002:

The definition of "single-tier municipalities" here contradicts the one at

1304:

changed its status from "town" to "municipality" on February 1, 2011 (see

1777: 1476:

http://www.leedsgrenville.com/en/invest/profile/membermunicipalities.asp

299: 1648:

divisions. Their types match the name prefixes of Muskoka and Oxford.

216: 1088:

lists. Any formatting ideas to keep the table and images in place?

985:

Also note, that we are consistent with statistics Canada usage see

398: 394: 1356:

http://www.brockville.com/economicdevelopment/index.cfm?ID=260

115: 1678:

unions of townships discontinue to be as such. Section 4 of

544:

What's the point of this list? It's pretty much the same as

318: 298: 262: 1466:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1342:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1044:

A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article

1042:

and there is no need for any of those superfluous photos.

477:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 715:

Don't be foolish. Wawa has never been a municipality. --

2072:

Featured lists that have appeared on the main page once

1335: 1012: 879: 93: 858:

Thanks Skeezix1000. Definitely important to mention.

393:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 215:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1498:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1388:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2067:Featured lists that have appeared on the main page 507:This article has not yet received a rating on the 63:This article appeared on Knowledge's Main Page as 1366:http://www.countyofperth.on.ca/about_perth_county 1776:The reference for the census division column is 2039:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1484:This message was posted before February 2018. 1374:This message was posted before February 2018. 1038:This "List of municipalities in Ontario" is a 2112:High-importance Canadian communities articles 8: 2102:High-importance Geography of Canada articles 469:, an attempt to structure and organize all 1998:Definition of "Single-tier municipalities" 1612:. See the note associated with each entry. 1454:I have just modified one external link on 1330:I have just modified one external link on 1197: 534:part of the Government Propaganda Machine. 434: 342: 147: 72: 15: 1843:Territorial Division Act, RSO 1980, c 497 1680:Territorial Division Act, RSO 1980, c 497 1557:Inconsistency under "Municipal sub-type" 473:. If you wish to help, please visit the 2082:High-importance Canada-related articles 1858:2607:FEA8:7A1F:F41F:5D18:AB8C:E3F2:58E7 1789:2607:FEA8:7A1F:F41F:5D18:AB8C:E3F2:58E7 1575:2607:FEA8:7A1F:F41F:5D18:AB8C:E3F2:58E7 1447:External links modified (February 2018) 1302:Northeastern Manitoulin and the Islands 436: 344: 149: 2107:FL-Class Canadian communities articles 1684:2607:FEA8:7A1F:F41F:897:70E3:1EFD:FB18 1659:2607:FEA8:7A1F:F41F:897:70E3:1EFD:FB18 917:Try adjusting your screen resolution. 546:List of census subdivisions in Ontario 2097:FL-Class Geography of Canada articles 1119:It is a problem on other lists, as I 1015:. Not sure if this edit was noticed.) 119: 7: 2122:FL-Class WikiProject Cities articles 1940:wide table to begin with. Thoughts? 629:Muskoka is not in Northern Ontario. 463:This article is within the scope of 387:This article is within the scope of 209:This article is within the scope of 2004:List of census divisions of Ontario 138:It is of interest to the following 47:. If you can update or improve it, 2034:Centre Block - Parliament Hill.jpg 14: 1716:list of upper-tier municipalities 1458:. Please take a moment to review 1456:List of municipalities in Ontario 1334:. Please take a moment to review 1332:List of municipalities in Ontario 27:List of municipalities in Ontario 2137:Unknown-importance List articles 2092:High-importance Ontario articles 2077:FL-Class Canada-related articles 1967: 716: 676: 549: 456: 438: 374: 364: 346: 330:WikiProject Canadian communities 274: 196: 186: 151: 120: 56: 19: 1682:is about unions of counties. -- 310:WikiProject Geography of Canada 249:This article has been rated as 1778:List of Ontario Municipalities 750:Recently deleted See also link 1: 2020:14:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC) 1986:08:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC) 1950:07:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC) 1920:07:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC) 1899:04:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 1881:03:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 1866:03:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 1821:07:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC) 1797:02:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 1758:07:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC) 1692:03:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC) 1667:03:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC) 1629:06:58, 17 December 2018 (UTC) 1598:04:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 1583:02:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC) 1552:15:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC) 1318:05:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC) 1121:discussed with you previously 1029:08:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC) 997:13:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC) 975:04:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC) 948:02:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC) 409:and see a list of open tasks. 327:This article is supported by 307:This article is supported by 287:This article is supported by 223:and see a list of open tasks. 2127:All WikiProject Cities pages 2117:All WikiProject Canada pages 2053:05:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC) 1710:list of local municipalities 1291:23:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC) 1268:16:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 1249:03:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC) 1232:03:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC) 1212:02:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC) 1008:List of municipalities in... 893:05:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 831:16:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) 659:Neither the government site 415:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities 229:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada 1442:19:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 868:20:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 853:15:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC) 800:13:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 487:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists 421:WikiProject Cities articles 418:Template:WikiProject Cities 232:Template:WikiProject Canada 2158: 2142:WikiProject Lists articles 1768:Incorrect census divisions 1515:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1451:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1405:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1327:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1163:02:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 1148:02:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 1133:02:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 1112:00:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 1098:13:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 927:06:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 509:project's importance scale 490:Template:WikiProject Lists 255:project's importance scale 33:, which means it has been 2087:FL-Class Ontario articles 1185:15:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC) 1079:22:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 1056:19:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 912:23:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC) 777:15:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 742:14:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 729:05:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 705:05:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 689:04:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 670:04:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 655:Are these municipalities? 643:18:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 625:23:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 613:22:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 589:22:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 574:21:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 562:21:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 539:21:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 506: 451: 359: 326: 306: 270: 248: 181: 146: 75: 71: 1323:External links modified 1239:some of these. Cheers, 874:Municipal restructuring 471:list pages on Knowledge 235:Canada-related articles 101:Featured list candidate 2132:FL-Class List articles 323: 303: 267: 128:This article is rated 322: 302: 266: 65:Today's featured list 1496:regular verification 1386:regular verification 1191:Incorrect population 1486:After February 2018 1376:After February 2018 290:WikiProject Ontario 45:Knowledge community 39:as one of the best 2045:Community Tech bot 2010:for discussion. - 1540:InternetArchiveBot 1491:InternetArchiveBot 1430:InternetArchiveBot 1381:InternetArchiveBot 1013:embedded this note 401:and various other 390:WikiProject Cities 324: 304: 268: 212:WikiProject Canada 134:content assessment 76:Article milestones 67:on March 27, 2020. 1516: 1406: 1214: 1202:comment added by 978: 961:comment added by 834: 817:comment added by 782:"found within..." 523: 522: 519: 518: 515: 514: 466:WikiProject Lists 433: 432: 429: 428: 341: 340: 337: 336: 114: 113: 110: 109: 2149: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1938: 1550: 1541: 1514: 1513: 1492: 1440: 1431: 1404: 1403: 1382: 1353: 1220:census divisions 977: 955: 878:I reverted this 833: 811: 805:New amalgamation 773: 720: 680: 639: 609: 553: 495: 494: 491: 488: 485: 460: 453: 452: 442: 435: 423: 422: 419: 416: 413: 384: 379: 378: 377: 368: 361: 360: 350: 343: 284: 279: 278: 277: 237: 236: 233: 230: 227: 206: 201: 200: 199: 190: 183: 182: 177: 174: 155: 148: 131: 125: 124: 116: 96: 73: 60: 43:produced by the 23: 16: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2057: 2056: 2041:nomination page 2027: 2000: 1968: 1966: 1932: 1770: 1559: 1544: 1539: 1507: 1500:have permission 1490: 1464:this simple FaQ 1449: 1434: 1429: 1397: 1390:have permission 1380: 1347: 1340:this simple FaQ 1325: 1298: 1278: 1193: 1036: 1034:Pretty pictures 956: 935: 900: 876: 840: 812: 807: 796: 790: 784: 771: 752: 657: 637: 607: 531: 492: 489: 486: 483: 482: 420: 417: 414: 411: 410: 380: 375: 373: 280: 275: 273: 251:High-importance 234: 231: 228: 225: 224: 202: 197: 195: 176:High‑importance 175: 161: 132:on Knowledge's 129: 92: 12: 11: 5: 2155: 2153: 2145: 2144: 2139: 2134: 2129: 2124: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2099: 2094: 2089: 2084: 2079: 2074: 2069: 2059: 2058: 2037: 2036: 2026: 2023: 2012:Themightyquill 1999: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1884: 1883: 1851:O. Reg. 278/98 1835:O. Reg. 180/03 1824: 1823: 1782:O. Reg. 180/03 1769: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1727: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1632: 1631: 1617: 1613: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1558: 1555: 1534: 1533: 1526: 1479: 1478: 1470:Added archive 1448: 1445: 1424: 1423: 1416: 1369: 1368: 1360:Added archive 1358: 1324: 1321: 1297: 1296:Status changes 1294: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1252: 1251: 1235: 1234: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1114: 1104:Secondarywaltz 1082: 1081: 1048:Secondarywaltz 1035: 1032: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 934: 931: 930: 929: 899: 896: 875: 872: 871: 870: 839: 836: 806: 803: 794: 788: 783: 780: 751: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 732: 731: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 692: 691: 656: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 530: 527: 525: 521: 520: 517: 516: 513: 512: 505: 499: 498: 496: 461: 449: 448: 443: 431: 430: 427: 426: 424: 407:the discussion 386: 385: 369: 357: 356: 351: 339: 338: 335: 334: 325: 315: 314: 305: 295: 294: 286: 285: 282:Ontario portal 269: 259: 258: 247: 241: 240: 238: 221:the discussion 208: 207: 191: 179: 178: 156: 144: 143: 137: 126: 112: 111: 108: 107: 104: 97: 94:August 9, 2012 89: 88: 85: 82: 78: 77: 69: 68: 61: 53: 52: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2154: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2123: 2120: 2118: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2098: 2095: 2093: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2083: 2080: 2078: 2075: 2073: 2070: 2068: 2065: 2064: 2062: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2024: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2006:. Please see 2005: 1997: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1974: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1936: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1854: 1852: 1847: 1844: 1838: 1836: 1830: 1829: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1783: 1779: 1774: 1767: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1731: 1730:Municipal Act 1725: 1724:Municipal Act 1721: 1720:Municipal Act 1717: 1711: 1707: 1706:Municipal Act 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1542: 1531: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1511: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1487: 1482: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1446: 1444: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1421: 1417: 1414: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1401: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1357: 1351: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1328: 1322: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1295: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1275: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1033: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1016: 1014: 1009: 998: 994: 990: 986: 984: 983: 980: 979: 976: 972: 968: 964: 963:NotWillyWonka 960: 952: 951: 950: 949: 945: 941: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 915: 914: 913: 909: 905: 897: 895: 894: 890: 886: 881: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 856: 855: 854: 850: 846: 837: 835: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 804: 802: 801: 798: 797: 781: 779: 778: 775: 774: 768: 767: 762: 758: 749: 743: 740: 736: 735: 734: 733: 730: 727: 723: 719: 714: 713: 706: 703: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 690: 687: 683: 679: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 661: 654: 644: 641: 640: 634: 633: 628: 627: 626: 623: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 611: 610: 604: 603: 598: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 575: 572: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 560: 556: 552: 547: 543: 542: 541: 540: 537: 528: 526: 510: 504: 501: 500: 497: 493:List articles 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 462: 459: 455: 454: 450: 447: 444: 441: 437: 425: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 391: 383: 382:Cities portal 372: 370: 367: 363: 362: 358: 355: 352: 349: 345: 332: 331: 321: 317: 316: 312: 311: 301: 297: 296: 292: 291: 283: 272: 265: 261: 260: 256: 252: 246: 243: 242: 239: 222: 218: 214: 213: 205: 204:Canada portal 194: 192: 189: 185: 184: 180: 173: 169: 165: 160: 157: 154: 150: 145: 141: 135: 127: 123: 118: 117: 105: 103: 102: 98: 95: 91: 90: 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 70: 66: 62: 59: 55: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 37: 32: 31:featured list 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 2038: 2028: 2001: 1972: 1855: 1848: 1839: 1831: 1825: 1786: 1775: 1771: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1705: 1609: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1538: 1535: 1510:source check 1489: 1483: 1480: 1453: 1450: 1428: 1425: 1400:source check 1379: 1373: 1370: 1329: 1326: 1299: 1279: 1198:— Preceding 1194: 1116: 1039: 1037: 1017: 1007: 1005: 957:— Preceding 936: 933:Area reverts 901: 877: 841: 808: 792: 785: 770: 765: 760: 756: 753: 658: 636: 631: 606: 601: 596: 582: 532: 524: 475:project page 464: 388: 328: 308: 288: 250: 210: 140:WikiProjects 99: 49:please do so 34: 26: 1204:65.92.19.52 845:Skeezix1000 813:—Preceding 722:Earl Andrew 682:Earl Andrew 555:Earl Andrew 403:settlements 172:Communities 2061:Categories 1605:counties". 1547:Report bug 1437:Report bug 1300:Note that 898:Formatting 479:discussion 36:identified 1935:Mattximus 1873:Mattximus 1530:this tool 1523:this tool 1420:this tool 1413:this tool 1350:dead link 1260:Mattximus 1177:Mattximus 1155:Mattximus 1153:anyway). 1140:Mattximus 1090:Mattximus 989:Mattximus 940:Mattximus 904:Mattximus 819:Mattximus 739:Gary Will 667:Gary Will 168:Geography 1536:Cheers.— 1426:Cheers.— 1200:unsigned 1117:Comment: 971:contribs 959:unsigned 880:addition 827:contribs 815:unsigned 662:nor AMO 529:Untitled 130:FL-class 106:Promoted 1714:In the 1460:my edit 1354:tag to 1336:my edit 1175:Fixed. 1063:WP:FLCR 838:Toronto 702:WikiWoo 622:WikiWoo 586:WikiWoo 571:WikiWoo 536:WikiWoo 253:on the 164:Ontario 84:Process 1346:Added 1276:Images 1125:IJBall 1067:WP:FLC 772:Lawyer 763:page. 638:Lawyer 608:Lawyer 412:Cities 395:cities 354:Cities 226:Canada 217:Canada 159:Canada 136:scale. 87:Result 1978:Hwy43 1973:Done: 1942:Hwy43 1912:Hwy43 1891:Hwy43 1813:Hwy43 1750:Hwy43 1621:Hwy43 1590:Hwy43 1310:Hwy43 1241:Hwy43 1224:Hwy43 1071:Hwy43 1021:Hwy43 919:Hwy43 885:Hwy43 860:Hwy43 757:could 484:Lists 446:Lists 399:towns 41:lists 29:is a 2049:talk 2016:talk 1982:talk 1946:talk 1916:talk 1895:talk 1877:talk 1862:talk 1817:talk 1808:and 1793:talk 1754:talk 1688:talk 1663:talk 1625:talk 1594:talk 1579:talk 1314:talk 1306:here 1287:talk 1283:Huon 1264:talk 1245:talk 1228:talk 1208:talk 1181:talk 1159:talk 1144:talk 1129:talk 1108:talk 1094:talk 1075:talk 1052:talk 1040:list 1025:talk 993:talk 967:talk 944:talk 923:talk 908:talk 889:talk 864:talk 849:talk 823:talk 795:talk 761:this 726:talk 686:talk 559:talk 548:. -- 245:High 81:Date 2043:. — 1504:RfC 1474:to 1394:RfC 1364:to 597:and 503:??? 2063:: 2051:) 2018:) 1984:) 1948:) 1918:) 1897:) 1879:) 1864:) 1856:-- 1819:) 1811:. 1805:, 1795:) 1787:-- 1784:. 1756:) 1690:) 1665:) 1657:-- 1627:) 1596:) 1581:) 1573:-- 1517:. 1512:}} 1508:{{ 1407:. 1402:}} 1398:{{ 1352:}} 1348:{{ 1316:) 1289:) 1266:) 1247:) 1230:) 1210:) 1183:) 1161:) 1146:) 1131:) 1110:) 1096:) 1077:) 1054:) 1027:) 995:) 987:] 973:) 969:• 946:) 925:) 910:) 891:) 866:) 851:) 829:) 825:• 791:/ 766:Oz 724:- 684:- 632:Oz 602:Oz 557:- 397:, 170:/ 166:/ 162:: 2047:( 2014:( 1980:( 1944:( 1937:: 1933:@ 1914:( 1893:( 1875:( 1860:( 1815:( 1791:( 1752:( 1686:( 1661:( 1623:( 1592:( 1577:( 1549:) 1545:( 1532:. 1525:. 1439:) 1435:( 1422:. 1415:. 1312:( 1285:( 1262:( 1243:( 1226:( 1206:( 1179:( 1157:( 1142:( 1127:( 1106:( 1092:( 1073:( 1050:( 1023:( 991:( 965:( 942:( 921:( 906:( 887:( 862:( 847:( 821:( 789:└ 511:. 481:. 333:. 313:. 293:. 257:. 142:: 51:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index