50:
32:
456:, which lists "masterpiece" as a synonym, but it would be excessive to expect that most editors would make such a link. Accordingly, I will strikeover my "Oppose" vote and cast a "Support" vote. Perhaps the finer distinctions between the two terms may be touched upon at some point in the
261:. Not the same meaning. A writer, painter or sculptor may produce several masterpieces during a lifetime of creative endeavor. The choice, however, of a single one of such works as the creator's magnum opus, meaning chief work or greatest work, may not be amenable to consensus.
327:
As you point out, there are nuances. Both "masterpiece" and "magnum opus" may be "considered the greatest work of a person's career", but these terms are not synonymous and must be taken in context. Numerous examples may be presented — no one will argue that
334:
is Proust's magnum opus and his masterpiece. However, when the names of other creative geniuses are invoked, the choices become less clear. Two of the most obvious examples, da Vinci and
Michelangelo, created a number of masterpieces, but is
369:
are his secondary masterpieces? Does the term "magnum opus" permit the inclusion of more than a single work and wouldn't such an inclusion contradict its very meaning? All of these indeterminacies need to be examined before arriving at a
399:'s magnum opus is, thankfully, not our job. What's important here is what's good for the encyclopedia. When an article links to the phrase "magnum opus" (and there are
412:
188:
76:
534:
72:
57:
37:
242:
123:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
343:
298:(emphasis mine). I believe this accurately represents the way the word "masterpiece" is used: "That building was her masterpiece." —
353:
142:
445:
158:
506:
166:
114:
62:
246:
516:
124:
492:
465:
375:
365:
266:
348:
330:
407:), or should the link go directly to that article, thereby saving editors' time and energy? Or should
403:), should the link go to this dab page and then have to be disambiguated (most likely with a pipe to
359:
173:, as the primary topic. The more minor uses of the term should remain listed at the dab page. Then a
139:
225:
488:
461:
424:
386:
371:
303:
281:
262:
200:
177:
496:
469:
428:
379:
307:
270:
250:
229:
204:
147:
136:
453:
17:
221:
528:
435:
420:
322:
299:
196:
440:
I appreciate the encyclopedic Wiki-dilemma you have delineated — there are separate
392:
457:
449:
441:
416:
408:
404:
287:
217:
213:
184:
170:
162:
154:
515:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
337:
411:
be a stand-alone article? That was tried in the past, but the article was
396:
294:
especially one that is considered the greatest work of a person's career
452:. Ideally, the term "Magnum opus" should then be expected to rely upon
49:
31:
191:
that resulted in the reverse move; however, the issue there was an
216:
is clearly the article for the primary meaning of the term and
286:
There are nuances of meaning, yes. But the first sentence of
241:
is a masterpiece and there's clearly a primary topic here.
292:...a creation that has been given much critical praise,
400:
67:
65:
pages on
Knowledge (XXG). If you wish to help, you can
75:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
505:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
127:. No further edits should be made to this section.
519:. No further edits should be made to this section.
347:is a masterpiece, but not his magnum opus? Is the
55:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
8:
61:, an attempt to structure and organize all
113:The following is a closed discussion of a
85:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Disambiguation
26:
71:attached to this talk page, or visit the
415:partly because it was too repetitive of
28:
291:
195:on "magnum opus", not the dab page. —
7:
132:The result of the move request was:
88:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
351:Michelangelo's magnum opus, while
25:
535:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
48:
30:
448:pages, but an article only for
391:Deciding which masterpiece is
341:da Vinci's magnum opus, while
106:Requested move 30 October 2016
1:
497:22:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
470:22:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
446:Masterpiece (disambiguation)
429:20:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
380:06:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
308:17:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
271:07:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
251:20:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
230:09:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
205:21:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
183:hatnote should be placed at
159:Magnum opus (disambiguation)
148:18:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
551:
58:WikiProject Disambiguation
454:its Wiktionary definition
43:
512:Please do not modify it.
120:Please do not modify it.
18:Talk:Magnum Opus (album)
220:should redirect there.
91:Disambiguation articles
349:Sistine Chapel ceiling
331:In Search of Lost Time
273:
167:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT
495:
468:
378:
354:The Last Judgment
290:explicitly says:
269:
256:
145:
103:
102:
99:
98:
16:(Redirected from
542:
514:
493:(talk)(contribs)
491:
466:(talk)(contribs)
464:
439:
390:
376:(talk)(contribs)
374:
326:
285:
267:(talk)(contribs)
265:
182:
176:
143:
122:
93:
92:
89:
86:
83:
70:
52:
45:
44:
34:
27:
21:
550:
549:
545:
544:
543:
541:
540:
539:
525:
524:
523:
510:
487:per nomination.
433:
384:
344:The Last Supper
320:
279:
243:207.161.217.209
187:. There was an
180:
174:
118:
108:
90:
87:
84:
81:
80:
66:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
548:
546:
538:
537:
527:
526:
522:
521:
507:requested move
501:
500:
499:
489:—Roman Spinner
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
462:—Roman Spinner
372:—Roman Spinner
313:
312:
311:
310:
263:—Roman Spinner
254:
253:
232:
153:
151:
130:
129:
115:requested move
109:
107:
104:
101:
100:
97:
96:
94:
82:Disambiguation
63:disambiguation
53:
41:
40:
38:Disambiguation
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
547:
536:
533:
532:
530:
520:
518:
513:
508:
503:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
437:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
388:
387:Roman Spinner
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
368:
367:
362:
361:
356:
355:
350:
346:
345:
340:
339:
333:
332:
324:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
297:
295:
289:
283:
282:Roman Spinner
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
179:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
150:
149:
146:
140:
138:
135:
128:
126:
121:
116:
111:
110:
105:
95:
78:
74:
69:
68:edit the page
64:
60:
59:
54:
51:
47:
46:
42:
39:
36:
33:
29:
19:
511:
504:
484:
401:many that do
393:Michelangelo
364:
358:
352:
342:
336:
329:
293:
258:
255:
238:
234:
210:
192:
165:should be a
152:
133:
131:
119:
112:
73:project page
56:
517:move review
458:Masterpiece
450:Masterpiece
442:Magnum opus
417:masterpiece
409:magnum opus
405:masterpiece
288:masterpiece
239:magnum opus
218:Magnum opus
214:Masterpiece
185:Masterpiece
171:Masterpiece
163:Magnum opus
161:– The page
155:Magnum opus
125:move review
370:consensus.
137:CĂşchullain
77:discussion
338:Mona Lisa
222:MrStoofer
529:Category
460:article.
436:Gorthian
421:Gorthian
397:Da Vinci
323:Gorthian
300:Gorthian
197:Gorthian
178:redirect
485:Support
413:deleted
235:Support
211:Support
193:article
395:'s or
259:Oppose
366:PietĂ
360:David
134:Move.
444:and
425:talk
419:. —
363:and
304:talk
247:talk
237:– A
226:talk
201:talk
509:.
296:...
189:AFD
169:to
531::
427:)
357:,
306:)
249:)
228:)
203:)
181:}}
175:{{
157:→
117:.
438::
434:@
423:(
389::
385:@
325::
321:@
302:(
284::
280:@
257:*
245:(
224:(
199:(
144:c
141:/
79:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
